PHP 9 HC CNE
PHP 9 HC CNE
Must
Prioritize
Highway
Funding
Fuel
Tax
Remains
Most
Effective,
Efficient
Way
to
Fund
Infrastructure
America's
infrastructure
is
showing
signs
of
age,
and
unfortunately,
the
current
18.4
cents-per-gallon
fuel
tax
rate
is
insufficient
to
fund
both
the
repair
and
expansion
of
our
highway
infrastructure.
To
keep
the
U.S.
competitive
and
facilitate
efficient
interstate
commerce,
it
is
imperative
that
the
federal
government
address
the
fuel
tax
issue
and
maintain
its
strong
national
role
in
infrastructure
development
in
the
next
transportation
reauthorization.
Trust
Fund
Out
of
Money:
By
2015,
the
Highway
Trust
Fund
won't
be
able
to
meet
its
obligations,
according
to
a
recent
statement
by
the
Congressional
Budget
Office
(CBO)
to
the
House
Budget
Committee.
Without
addressing
the
issue,
the
report
says
Federal
lawmakers
would
have
to
cut
transportation
spending
by
92
percent
in
order
to
bring
revenue
and
spending
in
line.
The
federal
motor
fuels
tax,
which
is
currently
18.4
cents
per
gallon
for
gasoline
and
24.4
cents
for
diesel,
hasnt
been
increased
since
1993.
In
addition,
Americans
are
driving
more
fuel-efficient
vehicles
and
driving
less.
Congress
should
no
longer
delay
action
on
this
pressing
issue.
The
cost
of
doing
nothing
will
cause
further
decline
in
our
infrastructure,
drastically
increasing
costs,
imperiling
safety,
and
ultimately,
stifling
economic
growth.
Now
is
the
time
to
act.
Fuel
Tax
Still
the
Most
Effective,
Efficient
Solution:
In
recent
years
with
the
prolonged
recession,
Congress
has
been
hesitant
to
consider
an
increase
in
the
fuel
tax.
However,
fuel
taxes
remain
the
most
efficient
and
equitable
method
to
raise
dedicated
highway
funds.
Fuel
taxes
are
the
ultimate
user
fee
or
pay-as-you-go
approach,
which
is
why
they
have
been
used
for
so
many
decades
to
build
and
maintain
our
existing
infrastructure.
Other
funding
solutions,
such
as
tolling,
encounter
significant
public
opposition
and
are
an
extremely
inefficient
means
of
funding
infrastructure.
Nearly
one-third
of
all
tolling
revenue
collected
is
spent
on
toll
collection,
even
with
electronic
collections
systems.
Administering
the
federal
motor
fuels
tax,
by
comparison,
costs
just
0.2
percent
of
the
fees
collected.
Ignoring
the
Issue
Leads
to
Unfavorable
Solutions:
Failing
to
address
the
need
for
increased
highway
funding
at
the
federal
level
encourages
states
to
seek
alternative
funding
solutions
that
are
unfavorable
to
citizens
and
businesses,
such
as
tolling.
Most
notably,
Virginia,
North
Carolina
and
Missouri
have
sought
to
toll
interstates
under
a
Federal
Highway
Administration
pilot
program.
None
of
these
efforts
has
moved
forward,
however,
amid
strong
public
opposition.
Tolls
result
in
double
taxation
on
motorists,
while
threatening
residents
and
businesses
with
economic
hardships,
diversion
of
traffic
to
less-safe
roads,
and
increased
costs
for
shipped
goods.
Desire
to
Adjust
Fuel
Tax
Gaining
Momentum:
The
number
of
states
seeking
to
generate
transportation
revenues
by
increasing
their
state
motor
fuel
taxes
is
growing,
which
could
help
to
generate
the
political
will
to
make
a
change
at
the
federal
level.
Wyoming
was
the
first
state
this
year
to
raise
its
fuel
tax,
raising
its
tax
to
24
cents
per
gallon
from
14
cents.
Proposals
in
Washington,
New
Hampshire,
Michigan,
Pennsylvania,
Nevada
and
Vermont
are
also
under
consideration.
Alternatively,
at
least
18
states
are
considering
proposals
that
move
away
from
a
cents-per-gallon
excise
tax
and
toward
a
percentage-based
sales
tax
collected
at
the
wholesale
level
that
would
keep
up
with
inflation.
Virginias
newly
passed
tax
replaces
the
states
17.5-cents-per-gallon
tax
on
gasoline
with
a
3.5
percent
wholesale
tax
on
motor
fuels
that
will
keep
pace
with
economic
growth
and
inflation.
Maryland
also
recently
reduced
the
states
23.5-cents-per
gallon
gas
tax
by
5
cents
per
gallon
and
replaced
it
with
a
new
3
percent
sales
tax
at
the
wholesale
level,
phased
in
over
two
years.
Action Requested: Leadership will undoubtedly consider major changes to the current system as it begins to negotiate the next highway transportation bill. As the collectors of the nations fuel taxes, fuel retailers are in the best position to provide valuable input into how the system works and whether potential changes to it are viable. We ask to be at the table for these discussions to provide feedback on any changes to the current system that may be considered. NATSO staff contacts: Holly Alfano, halfano@natso.com, (703) 739-8501; Brad Stotler, bstotler@natso.com, (703) 739-8566