Mean Value Theorem

MIT OpenCourseWare
http://ocw.mit.edu
18.01 Single Variable Calculus

Fall 2006
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.
Lecture 14 18.01 Fall 2006
Lecture 14: Mean Value Theorem and Inequalities
Mean-Value Theorem
The Mean-Value Theorem (MVT) is the underpinning of calculus. It says:
If f is differentiable on a < x < b, and continuous on a ≤ x ≤ b, then

f (b) − f (a)
= f � (c) (for some c, a < c < b)
b−a
f (b) − f (a)
Here, is the slope of a secant line, while f � (c) is the slope of a tangent line.
b−a
secant line
slope
f’(c)
b
a c
Figure 1: Illustration of the Mean Value Theorem.
Geometric Proof: Take (dotted) lines parallel to the secant line, as in Fig. 1 and shift them up
from below the graph until one of them first touches the graph. Alternatively, one may have to start
with a dotted line above the graph and move it down until it touches.
If the function isn’t differentiable, this approach goes wrong. For instance, it breaks down for
the function f (x) = |x|. The dotted line always touches the graph first at x = 0, no matter what its
slope is, and f � (0) is undefined (see Fig. 2).
1
Figure 2: Graph of y = |x|, with secant line. (MVT goes wrong.)
Interpretation of the Mean Value Theorem
You travel from Boston to Chicago (which we’ll assume is a 1,000 mile trip) in exactly 3 hours. At
1000
some time in between the two cities, you must have been going at exactly mph.
3
f (t) = position, measured as the distance from Boston.
f (3) = 1000, f (0) = 0, a = 0, and b = 3.

1000 f (b) − f (a)
= = f � (c)
3 3
where f � (c) is your speed at some time, c.
Versions of the Mean Value Theorem
There is a second way of writing the MVT:
f (b) − f (a) = f � (c)(b − a)

f (b) = f (a) + f � (c)(b − a) (for some c, a < c < b)
There is also a third way of writing the MVT: change the name of b to x.
f (x) = f (a) + f � (c)(x − a) for some c, a < c < x
The theorem does not say what c is. It depends on f , a, and x.

This version of the MVT should be compared with linear approximation (see Fig. 3).
f (x) ≈ f (a) + f � (a)(x − a) x near a
2
The tangent line in the linear approximation has a definite slope f � (a). by contrast formula is an
exact formula. It conceals its lack of specificity in the slope f � (c), which could be the slope of f at
any point between a and x.
(x,f(x))
error
(a,f(a))
y=f(a) + f’(a)(x-a)
Figure 3: MVT vs. Linear Approximation.
Uses of the Mean Value Theorem.
Key conclusions: (The conclusions from the MVT are theoretical)
1. If f � (x) > 0, then f is increasing.

2. If f � (x) < 0, then f is decreasing.
3. If f � (x) = 0 all x, then f is constant.
Definition of increasing/decreasing:
Increasing means a < b ⇒ f (a) < f (b). Decreasing means a < b =⇒ f (a) < f (b).
Proofs:
Proof of 1:
a < b
f (b) = f (a) + f � (c)(b − a)
Because f � (c) and (b − a) are both positive,
f (b) = f (a) + f � (c)(b − a) > f (a)
(The proof of 2 is omitted because it is similar to the proof of 1)
Proof of 3:
f (b) = f (a) + f � (c)(b − a) = f (a) + 0(b − a) = f (a)
Conclusions 1,2, and 3 seem obvious, but let me persuade you that they are not. Think back to the
definition of the derivative. It involves infinitesimals. It’s not a sure thing that these infinitesimals
have anything to do with the non-infinitesimal behavior of the function.
3
Inequalities
The fundamental property f � > 0 =⇒ f is increasing can be used to deduce many other inequali
ties.
Example. ex
1. ex > 0
2. ex > 1 for x > 0
3. ex > 1 + x
Proofs. We will take property 1 (ex > 0) for granted. Proofs of the other two properties follow:
Proof of 2: Define f1 (x) = ex − 1. Then, f1 (0) = e0 − 1 = 0, and f1� (x) = ex > 0. (This last assertion
is from step 1). Hence, f1 (x) is increasing, so f (x) > f (0) for x > 0. That is:
ex > 1 for x > 0
.
Proof of 3: Let f2 (x) = ex − (1 + x).
f2� (x) = ex − 1 = f1 (x) > 0 (if x > 0).

Hence, f2 (x) > 0 for x > 0. In other words,
ex > 1 + x
x2 x2
Similarly, ex > 1 + x + (proved using f3 (x) = ex − (1 + x + )). One can keep on going:
2 2
x2 x3
ex > 1 + x + + for x > 0. Eventually, it turns out that
2 3!
x2 x3
ex = 1 + x + + + ··· (an infinite sum)
2 3!
We will be discussing this when we get to Taylor series near the end of the course.

Mean Value Theorem

Uploaded by

Mean Value Theorem

Uploaded by

MIT OpenCourseWare

18.01 Single Variable Calculus

Lecture 14: Mean Value Theorem and Inequalities

The Mean-Value Theorem (MVT) is the underpinning of calculus. It says:

If f is diﬀerentiable on a < x < b, and continuous on a ≤ x ≤ b, then

Figure 1: Illustration of the Mean Value Theorem.

Figure 2: Graph of y = |x|, with secant line. (MVT goes wrong.)

Interpretation of the Mean Value Theorem

f (t) = position, measured as the distance from Boston.

f (3) = 1000, f (0) = 0, a = 0, and b = 3.

Versions of the Mean Value Theorem

There is a second way of writing the MVT:

f (b) − f (a) = f � (c)(b − a)

f (x) = f (a) + f � (c)(x − a) for some c, a < c < x

The theorem does not say what c is. It depends on f , a, and x.

f (x) ≈ f (a) + f � (a)(x − a) x near a

Figure 3: MVT vs. Linear Approximation.

Uses of the Mean Value Theorem.

Key conclusions: (The conclusions from the MVT are theoretical)

1. If f � (x) > 0, then f is increasing.

f (b) = f (a) + f � (c)(b − a) = f (a) + 0(b − a) = f (a)

ex > 1 for x > 0

f2� (x) = ex − 1 = f1 (x) > 0 (if x > 0).

You might also like