Scribd
Upload
172 views6 pages

Ich Q2B

1. The document discusses validation characteristics that should be evaluated for analytical procedures, including specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision (repeatability and intermediate precision), robustness, and system suitability testing. 2. For linearity, a minimum of 5 concentrations across the range should be used to establish a linear relationship. 3. The ICH guidelines now define reporting and identification thresholds that should be applied instead of quantitation and detection limits.

Uploaded by

magicianchemist
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
172 views6 pages

Ich Q2B

1. The document discusses validation characteristics that should be evaluated for analytical procedures, including specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision (repeatability and intermediate precision), robustness, and system suitability testing. 2. For linearity, a minimum of 5 concentrations across the range should be used to establish a linear relationship. 3. The ICH guidelines now define reporting and identification thresholds that should be applied instead of quantitation and detection limits.

Uploaded by

magicianchemist
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 6

1.

ICH Q2B Guideline Validation of Analytical Procedures Methodology


Comments for its application

ICH Q2B C

71

Introduction
All relevant data collected during validation and formulae used for calculating validation characteristics should be submitted and discussed as appropriate. It is the responsibility of the applicant to choose the validation procedure and protocol most suitable for their product. Well-characterised reference materials, with documented purity, should be used. The degree of purity necessary depends on the intended use. The validation characteristics 1. Specificity 2. Linearity 3. Quantitation limit 4. Detection limit 5. Range 6. Accuracy 7. Precision Repeatability Intermediate Precision Reproducibility

8. Robustness 9. System Suitability Testing

1.
1.1 Identification

Specificity

Discrimination between compounds of closely related structures which are likely to be present.

ICH Q2B C

72

1.2

Assay and Impurity test

For chromatographic procedures, representative chromatogram. Resolution of the two compounds which elute closest together. In case of non specific assay is used, a combination can be applied: Titration for assay, suitable test for impurities. 1.2.1 Impurities are available Assay: Spiking pure substance (drug substance or drug product) with appropriate levels of impurities and/or excipients. Assay result unaffected. Impurity test: spiking drug substance or drug product with appropriate levels of impurities and demonstrating separation

1.2.2 Impurities not available Samples stored under relevant stress conditions - assay: the two results are compared - impurity test: impurity profiles are compared Peak purity test: diode array, mass spectrometry

2.

Linearity

Linearity should be established across the range. Minimum 5 concentrations: dilution standard stock solution separate weighing of synthetic mixtures

Linear relationship, regression analysis correlation coefficient y-intercept slope of regression line residual sum of squares.

ICH Q2B C

73

3. Quantitation limit, 4. Detection limit

The ICH guideline on validation has been succeeded by the ICH guidelines on Impurities in New drug substances and Drug Products. There have been threshold levels defined for Reporting thresholds Identification thresholds

They should be applied instead of quantitation and detection limits.

5. Range

Analytical procedure Assay of drug substance or finished product Impurity (quantification) Assay and impurity

Range 80 - 120 % of test solution Reporting threshold to 120% of acceptance criteria One test with 100 % standard Linearity: Reporting threshold to 120 % assay acceptance criterion

Content uniformity Dissolution testing Drug release testing

70 - 130 % of test concentration 20% over specified range 20% after 1 hour up to 90% after 24 hours 0-110 % of label claim

ICH Q2B C

74

6. Accuracy
Established across the specified range Analytical procedure General Validation procedure 9 determinations over 3 concentrations covering specified range 3 concentrations, 3 replicates reporting - % recovery or - difference between mean and accepted true value - confidence interval

Drug substance

Application of analytical procedure to analyte of known purity ( reference material) Placebo + drug substance adding known quantities of drug substance to drug product

Drug product

Impurities (quantification)

Adding known quantities of impurities to drug product Placebo + impurities The individual or total impurities are determined e.g. weight/weight or area percent, in all cases with respect to the major analyte

ICH Q2B C

75

7.
Analytical procedure Assay and impurity Validation characteristic Repeatability

Precision

Validation procedure 9 determination from accuracy 6 determinations at 100% of test concentration

Intermediate precision

Different days Analysts Equipment Not necessary to study these effects individually 2 x 6 determinations at 100 % of test concentration standard deviation relative standard deviation confidence interval

Recommended data

8.

Robustness

Should be considered during development phase Variations: Stability of analytical solutions different equipment different analysts HPLC: influence of pH in mobile phase variations in mobile phase different column temperature flow rate

9. System Suitability Testing


Integral part of analytical procedures
ICH Q2B C 76

You might also like