Lecture 4 (EC4 Version)
Lecture 4 (EC4 Version)
Chiew Sing-Ping S h l of School f Ci Civil il and d Environmental E i t l Engineering E i i Nanyang Technological University
Scope of Lecture 4
General Local buckling of steel element Simplified calculation method Axial compression Resistance to compression and bending moment Worked example
Composite column
Composite columns often offer significant economic advantages over either structural steel or reinforced concrete alternatives. High load carrying capacities and high flexural rigidities with smaller sizes at reduced costs. Excellent inherent fire resistances. Can be very strong - range of capacities for the same external dimensions resulting in same column size externally in all floors of a building.
Concrete in in-filled filled composite section Circular steel hollow section Rectangular steel hollow section
a) Full encased
b) partially encased
Local buckling
Fully encased steel sections
The effects of local buckling b ckling ma may be neglected if:
The concrete cover thickness is not less than the lager of the two following 40mm b/6
cy bc b cy cz tw h tf cz hc
max (d / t ) = 90
235 fy
zzz y z
z b
max (h / t ) = 52
235 fy
tf
max (b / tf ) = 44
235 fy
10
Calculation method
Two methods for calculating the resistance of composite columns:
General Method
Second Second-order order effects and imperfections taken into account in calculation Can be used for asymmetric sections Needs suitable numerical software
Simplified Method
Full interaction between the steel and concrete sections until failure Geometric imperfections p and residual stresses taken into account in calculation, usually using European buckling curves Plane sections remain plane
11
12
N pl,Rd = Aa f yd + Ac c f cd + As f sd
c takes as 1 1.0 0 for concrete filled cross cross-sections sections 0.85 0 85 for fully or partially concrete encased steel cross-sections
0.85 f cd f yd f sd
N pl,Rd
13
N pl , Rd
t fy = a Aa f yd + Ac f cd 1 + c d f + As f sd ck
t d
Use in design if: Relative slenderness 0.5 e/d < 0.1, where e =MEd/NEd
14
a = ao + (1 + ao )(10e/d ) c = co (1 - 10e/d )
For e = 0:
t d
a = ao = 0.25 3 + 2
1 .0
2
c = co = 4.9 - 18.5 + 17
For e/d > 0.1:
a = 1
c = 0
15
Relative slenderness
The relative slenderness is needed to check that the composite column is within the limits of applicability of the simplified method.
=
Npl,Rk
N pl, l Rk k N cr
N pl, pl Rk = Aa f y + 0.85 Ac f ck + As f sk
N pl,Rk = Aa f y + Ac f ck + As f sk
for fully or partially concrete encased steel section for concrete filled section
Ncr
N cr =
2 (EI )eff
L2
16
(EI )eff ff
= Ea I a + Es I s + K e Ecm I c
Ke = 0.6 Reinforcement Concrete Ecm, secant t modulus d l of concrete EC2
17
(EI )eff
= Ea I a + Es I s + K e Ec,eff I c
Ke = 0.6
1 + (N G, Ed / N Ed ) t
EC2
t creep coefficient
NEd the total design load NG,Ed permanent part of axial design load
18
N Ed 1.0 N pl,Rd
+ 2 -
1.0
= 0 .5 1 + - 0 .2 +
=
N pl,Rk N cr
19
a b
0.0
1.0
2.0
20
s 3% 3% < s 6%
21
22
fcd
fyd
Point B
hn
fcd +
fyd -
fsd Mpl,Rd
No axial force
23
fcd +
fyd + fyd -
fsd Mc = Mpl,Rd pl Rd
Point D
hn
fcd d -
Npm,Rd = fcdAc
24
M max,i,Rd = Wp,i f id
Point D
fcd d fyd fsd d Mmax,Rd ND
M max,Rd = M max,i,Rd
i =1
are the plastic section moduli for the steel section, the reinforcement i f t and d the th concrete t of f the th composite it crosssection respectively (for the calculation of Wpc, the concrete is assumed to be uncracked). uncracked)
25
Point B
hn
fcd d +
fyd -
fsd Mpl,Rd
+ fcd
No axial force
fcd
fcd
hn
M pl.c,Rd
M max.c,Rd
M pl,n.c,Rd
hn
M pl.a,Rd
M max.a,Rd
M pl,n.a,Rd
26
Wpa,Wps, Wpc
hn
27
W ps = Asi [ei ]
W pc
2 ( b - 2t )(h - 2t ) 2 3 2 h = - r - r (4 - ) - t - r - W
i =1
Ac f cd - Asn (2 f sd - f cd ) hn = 2bf cd + 4t (2 f yd - f cd )
W ps ,n = Asn ,i [ez ,i ]
n i =1
ps
For z-axis, the dimensions h and b are g to calculate the to be exchanged related perimeters
28
d3 W pa = - W pc - W ps 6 n W ps = Asi [ei ]
i =1
Ac f cd - Asn (2 f sd - f cd ) hn = 2df cd + 4t (2 f yd - f cd )
W ps ,n = Asn ,i [ez ,i ]
n i =1
W pc
3 ( d - 2t ) = -W
ps
29
30
31
fsd Mpl,Rd
hn
No axial force
32
fyd
hn 2hn hn +
fsd -
Mpl,Rd
Npm,Rd
Fully encased H-section --- Points C NC= Npm,Rd = 0.85fcdAc MC= Mpl,Rd l Rd
33
Mmax,Rd
34
W ps = Asi [ei ]
bh W pc = - W ps - W pa 4
For neutral axis in the web, hn<h/2-tf
i =1 2 c c
W ps ,n = Asn ,i [ez ,i ]
n i =1
Ac c f cd - Asn (2 f sd - c f cd ) hn = 2bc c f cd + 2t w (2 f yd - c f cd )
bc
c = 0.85
ez y
W pan = t h
2 w n
h hc
z 35
hn =
2 W pan = bhn
(b - t w )(h - 2t 2f )
4
bc b
hn =
Ac c f cd - Asn (2 f sd - c f cd ) - Aa (2 f yd - c f cd ) 2bc c f cd
ez y
W p an = W p a
h hc
z 36
W ps = Asi [ei ]
i =1
W ps ,n = Asn ,i e y ,i
i =1
[ ]
bc b
bh W pc = - W ps - W pa 4
For hn tw/2
2 c c
y z
h hc
ey
37
hn =
2hc c f cd + 4t f (2 f yd - c f cd )
2 W pan = 2t f hn
4
bc b
For b/2<hn<bc/2
hn =
Ac c f cd - Asn (2 f sd - c f cd ) - Aa (2 f yd - c f cd ) 2hc c f cd d
y
W p an = W p a
h hc
ey
z 38
cr =
N cr,eff N Ed
10
2 (EI )eff,II
L2
k=
1 - N Ed N cr,eff
1.0
40
rMEd
-1 r 1
41
e0
M Ed.max = k1M Ed + k 2 N Ed e0
NEd
k1, k2 are the factors of second order effects
42
Member M b imperfection L/200 L/150 L/200 L/150 L/300 L/200 L/200 L/200 L/200
43
k1M1,Ed M2,Ed NEde0 (b) First order bending moment double curve M1,Ed
k2NEde0
(d) Imperfection (c) end moment moment increased increased by second order effect by second order effect
44
0
d=M Mpl,N,Rd/Mpl,Rd
1.0
M/Mpl,Rd
45
Mpl,N,Rd the plastic bending resistance =dMpl,Rd M a reduction factor =0.9 for S235 and S335 =0.8 08 f for S420 and d S460 if >1.0 should not be used in practice
46
(1 - ) f yd
with
2Va,Ed = - 1 V pl, a, Rd
47
Va,Ed = VEd
M pl,a,Rd M pl,Rd
48
Mdy
dy 1.0
My/Mpl,y,Rd
0 b) Axis(z-z)
dz 1.0
Mz/Mpl,z,Rd
49
dy
My,Ed Ed/Mpl,y,Rd l Rd
Mdz
dz
Mz,Ed/Mpl,z,Rd c) Biaxial bending resistance
50
M y,Ed
dy M pl, pl y, y Rd
M z,Ed
M, y
M, Mz
dy = d
where
dz M pl,z,Rd M y,Ed
dz = d
M = M, z M = M, y
dy M pl, y,Rd
M z, Ed
dz M pl,z,Rd
1 .0
51
Design procedure
Find NEd and M Ed at both ends of the column Calculate Npl,Rd pl Rd and Ncr Calculate , and then Is NEd Npl,Rd ? Yes Is the column in axial compression only? N No See next page
52
No
Column verified
Yes
Determine Mpl, a, Rd and Mpl, Rd, and hence Va, Ed and Vc, Ed. Is Va, Ed > 0.5Vpl, a, Rd?
No
No
Determine the interaction curve for the cross-section. Find member imperfection, e0.
Yes
Calculate and hence reduced fyd.
Yes
Determine MEd , the maximum firstorder bending moment within the column length. If MEd, 1 = MEd, 2 it is i MEd, max = MEd, 1 + NEde0
N No
Calculate Ncr, eff = 2(EI)eff, II/L2 find for end moments MEd, Ed top t and MEd, bot and hence k (= k1); find k2 for = 1; fi d the find th design d i moment t for f the th column, l MEd, max = k1MEd + k2NEde0
No
Find MEd, max by secondorder analysis of the pin-ended pin ended column length with force NEd and end moments MEd, 1 and MEd, 2.
From NEd and the interaction diagrams, find dy and dz. Check that the cross-section can resist My, Ed, Ed max and Mz, Ed, Ed max.
53
Worked Example
d = 406.4mm t = 12.5mm 160.0mm 138.5mm
80.0mm
Design Data C30/37 concrete S355 steel grade Effective length =3.0 m Es=210 kN/m2 fsk= 460 N/mm2 NEd=4000 kN MEd=50 kNm
12 12 bar
54
Design strength:
f yd = 355 / 1.0 = 355 N/mm 2 f sd = 460 / 1.15 = 400 N/mm 2 f cd = 30.0 / 1.15 = 20 N/mm 2
Ratio of reinforcement:
= As / Ac = 1357 .2 / 112891 .5x100% = 1.2% < 6.0%
55
(235 / 355 )2
= 59 .6
(0.2 0.9)
56
M Moment t of f inertia: i ti
40.644 38.144 Ia = = 30030.7cm 4 64 I s = 2 x1.131x16.02 + 4 x1.131x13.852 + 4 x1.131x8.02 = 1736.4cm 4 (38.14 )4 Ic = 1736.4 = 102134.2cm 4 64
Effective stiffness:
(EI )eff
= Ea I a + Es I s + K e Ecm I c = (210 x 30030.7 + 210 x1736.4 + 0.6 x 32 x102134.2 ) / 100 = 86078.6 kNm 2
57
] [
t fy + N pl, Rd = a Aa f yd + A c f cd 1 c d f ck
58
Interaction Curve
Plastic section moduli: Wpa = 1940cm3
W ps = Asi [ ei ] = 135cm 3
1
12
59
W pc =
( b 2t )( h 2t )
4
2 3 2 (d 2t )3 h r r ( 4 ) t r W ps = W ps 3 2 6
Neutral axis position Assume 2 reinforcements lies within the region 2hn
hn = Ac f cd Asn ( 2 f sd f cd ) f cd + 4t ( (2 f yd f cd ) 2df = 2 406.4 20 + 4 12.5 ( 2 355 20 ) 112891.5 20 113 ( 2 460 20 ) = 42.5mm
60
N pm, Rd = Ac f cd = 2258 kN
Point Bending Moment A M=0 MA= 0 NA= 8403.7 MB= 811 NB= 0 MC= 811 NC= 2258 22 8 MD= 833.8 ND= 1129 kNm kN kNm kN kNm k kN kNm kN Compression force N=Npl,Rd Bending Moment M=Mpl,Rd M=Mpl,Rd
61
Interaction curve
9000 8000 7000 N 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 200 400 M 600 800 C D B 1000 A
62
To check whether second order effects can be neglected, a reduced value of Ncr is required. The effective flexural stiffness is
6 2 ( EI )eff,II = K E I + K E I + E I = 63493 10 kNmm ( ) eff II o a a e,II e II c,eff c eff c s s
2 63493 106
3 10
2 6
= 69628 kN
The result is less than 10NEd for both major axis and minor axis, so the second seco do order de e effects ects must ust be a allowed o ed for. o The bending moment, MEd,top = 150 kNm, MEd,bot = 0 kNm, so r = 0, then, = 0.66.
k=
1 N Ed N cr,eff 1-
63
The bending moment MEd should be modified with the effect of member imperfection. The member imperfection is:
e0 = L /300 = 10 mm
The mid-length bending moments due to NEd are
kimp =
1- N Ed N cr,eff
64
Bending resistance
65
Conclusions
Design of composite column is rational and comprehensive for both concrete encased sections and concrete in-filled hollow sections. Both the strength and the deformation assessments should be carried out carefully. The flexural rigidities are essential in determining the column buckling behavior of composite column. The plastic stress block method is applicable to both steel and composite columns. However, although the design principles are the same, the calculation procedure for composite column is much more involved and complicated.
66
Conclusions
The design methodology for composite columns are as follows: Compression resistance Moment resistance Interaction I t ti b between t compression i and d bending b di moment Euler buckling formulation, column buckling curves, and reduction factors Second order effects and imperfection
4/11/2013
67