100% found this document useful (1 vote)

1K views

Tutorial Fluent (Dados NETO)

ANSYS, ANSYS Workbench, ANsoft, AUTODYN, EKM, Engineering Knowledge Manager, CFX, FLUENT, HFSS are registered trademarks or trademarks. All other brand, product, service and feature names or trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ANSYS software products and documentation include trade secrets and are confidential and proprietary products.

Uploaded by

Suellen Freire Rigatto

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

100% found this document useful (1 vote)

1K views

Tutorial Fluent (Dados NETO)

Uploaded by

Suellen Freire Rigatto

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 216

ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual

ANSYS, Inc. Southpointe 275 Technology Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317 ansysinfo@ansys.com http://www.ansys.com (T) 724-746-3304 (F) 724-514-9494

Release 14.5 October 2012

ANSYS, Inc. is certified to ISO 9001:2008.

Copyright and Trademark Information

2012 SAS IP, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use, distribution or duplication is prohibited. ANSYS, ANSYS Workbench, Ansoft, AUTODYN, EKM, Engineering Knowledge Manager, CFX, FLUENT, HFSS and any and all ANSYS, Inc. brand, product, service and feature names, logos and slogans are registered trademarks or trademarks of ANSYS, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States or other countries. ICEM CFD is a trademark used by ANSYS, Inc. under license. CFX is a trademark of Sony Corporation in Japan. All other brand, product, service and feature names or trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Disclaimer Notice
THIS ANSYS SOFTWARE PRODUCT AND PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION INCLUDE TRADE SECRETS AND ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY PRODUCTS OF ANSYS, INC., ITS SUBSIDIARIES, OR LICENSORS. The software products and documentation are furnished by ANSYS, Inc., its subsidiaries, or affiliates under a software license agreement that contains provisions concerning non-disclosure, copying, length and nature of use, compliance with exporting laws, warranties, disclaimers, limitations of liability, and remedies, and other provisions. The software products and documentation may be used, disclosed, transferred, or copied only in accordance with the terms and conditions of that software license agreement. ANSYS, Inc. is certified to ISO 9001:2008.

U.S. Government Rights

For U.S. Government users, except as specifically granted by the ANSYS, Inc. software license agreement, the use, duplication, or disclosure by the United States Government is subject to restrictions stated in the ANSYS, Inc. software license agreement and FAR 12.212 (for non-DOD licenses).

Third-Party Software
See the legal information in the product help files for the complete Legal Notice for ANSYS proprietary software and third-party software. If you are unable to access the Legal Notice, please contact ANSYS, Inc. Published in the U.S.A.

Table of Contents
I. Verification Test Case Descriptions .......................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Expected Results ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.2. References .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3. Using the Verification Manual and Test Cases ............................................................................... 4 1.4. Quality Assurance Services .......................................................................................................... 5 1.5. Index of ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Test cases ................................................................................... 5 01. VMFL001: Flow Between Rotating and Stationary Concentric Cylinders ............................................... 9 02. VMFL002: Laminar Flow Through a Pipe with Uniform Heat Flux ........................................................ 11 03. VMFL003: Pressure Drop in Turbulent Flow through a Pipe ................................................................ 13 04. VMFL004: Plain Couette Flow with Pressure Gradient ........................................................................ 15 05. VMFL005: Poiseuille Flow in a Pipe .................................................................................................... 19 06. VMFL006: Multicomponent Species Transport in Pipe Flow ............................................................... 21 07. VMFL007: Non-Newtonian Flow in a Pipe .......................................................................................... 23 08. VMFL008: Flow Inside a Rotating Cavity ............................................................................................ 25 09. VMFL009: Natural Convection in a Concentric Annulus ..................................................................... 29 10. VMFL010: Laminar Flow in a 90 Tee-Junction. .................................................................................. 33 11. VMFL011: Laminar flow in a Triangular Cavity .................................................................................... 37 12. VMFL012: Turbulent Flow in a Wavy Channel .................................................................................... 41 13. VMFL013: Turbulent Flow with Heat Transfer in a Backward-Facing Step ............................................ 45 14. VMFL014: Species Mixing in Co-axial Turbulent Jets .......................................................................... 47 15. VMFL015: Flow Through an Engine Inlet Valve ................................................................................... 51 16. VMFL016: Turbulent Flow in a Transition Duct ................................................................................... 55 17. VMFL017: Transonic Flow over an RAE 2822 Airfoil ............................................................................ 59 18. VMFL018: Shock Reflection in Supersonic Flow ................................................................................. 61 19. VMFL019: Transient Flow near a Wall Set in Motion ........................................................................... 65 20. VMFL020: Adiabatic Compression of Air in Cylinder by a Reciprocating Piston ................................... 67 21. VMFL021: Cavitation over a Sharp-Edged Orifice Case A: High Inlet Pressure ...................................... 71 22. VMFL022: Cavitation over a Sharp-Edged Orifice Case B: Low Inlet Pressure ....................................... 75 23. VMFL023: Oscillating Laminar Flow Around a Circular Cylinder .......................................................... 79 24. VMFL024: Interface of Two Immiscible Liquids in a Rotating Cylinder ................................................. 81 25. VMFL025: Turbulent Non-Premixed Methane Combustion with Swirling Air ....................................... 83 26. VMFL026: Supersonic Flow with Real Gas Effects inside a Shock Tube ................................................ 91 27. VMFL027: Turbulent Flow over a Backward-Facing Step ..................................................................... 95 28. VMFL028: Turbulent Heat Transfer in a Pipe Expansion ...................................................................... 99 29. VMFL029: Anisotropic Conduction Heat Transfer ............................................................................. 101 30. VMFL030: Turbulent Flow in a 90 Pipe-Bend ................................................................................... 103 31. VMFL031: Turbulent Flow Behind an Open-Slit V Gutter ................................................................... 105 32. VMFL032: Turbulent Flow with Separation Along an Axisymmetric Afterbody .................................. 109 33. VMFL033: Viscous Heating in an Annulus ........................................................................................ 113 34. VMFL034: Particle Aggregation inside a Turbulent Stirred Tank ........................................................ 117 35. VMFL035: 3-Dimensional Single-Stage Axial Compressor ................................................................ 119 36. VMFL036: Turbulent Round Jet ....................................................................................................... 121 37. VMFL037: Turbulent Flow over a Forward Facing Step ..................................................................... 125 38. VMFL038: Falling Film over an Inclined Plane .................................................................................. 129 39. VMFL039: Boiling in a Pipe with Heated Wall ................................................................................... 131 40. VMFL040: Separated Turbulent Flow in Diffuser .............................................................................. 135 41. VMFL041: Transonic Flow Over an Airfoil ......................................................................................... 139 42. VMFL042: Turbulent Mixing of Two Streams with Different Density .................................................. 143 43. VMFL043: Laminar to Turbulent Transition of Boundary Layer over a Flat Plate ................................. 147
Release 14.5 - SAS IP, Inc. All rights reserved. - Contains proprietary and confidential information of ANSYS, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates.

iii

Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual 44. VMFL044: Supersonic Nozzle Flow .................................................................................................. 149 45. VMFL045: Oblique Shock over an Inclined Ramp ............................................................................. 151 46. VMFL046: Supersonic Flow with Normal Shock in a Converging Diverging Nozzle ............................ 153 47. VMFL047: Turbulent Flow with Separation in an Asymmetric Diffuser .............................................. 155 48. VMFL048: Turbulent flow in a 180 Pipe Bend ................................................................................. 157 49. VMFL049: Combustion in an Axisymmetric Natural Gas Furnace ...................................................... 161 50. VMFL050: Transient Heat Conduction in a Semi-Infinite Slab ............................................................ 165 51. VMFL051: Isentropic Expansion of Supersonic Flow over a Convex Corner ....................................... 167 52. VMFL052: Turbulent Natural Convection inside a Tall Cavity ............................................................. 169 38. VMFL053: Compressible Turbulent Mixing Layer ............................................................................. 173 38. VMFL054: Laminar flow in a Trapezoidal Cavity ............................................................................... 175 55. VMFL055: Transitional Recirculatory Flow inside a Ventilation Enclosure .......................................... 179 56. VMFL056: Combined Conduction and Radiation in a Square Cavity ................................................. 181 57. VMFL057: Radiation and Conduction in Composite Solid Layers ...................................................... 183 58. VMFL058: Turbulent Flow in an Axisymmetric Diffuser ..................................................................... 185 59. VMFL059: Conduction in a Composite Solid Block .......................................................................... 187 60. VMFL060: Transitional Supersonic Flow over a Rearward Facing Step ............................................... 189 61. VMFL061: Surface to Surface Radiative Heat Transfer between Two Concentric Cylinders ................ 191 62. VMFL062: Fully Developed Turbulent Flow Over a Hill ................................................................... 195 63. VMFL063: Separated Laminar Flow over a Blunt Plate ...................................................................... 197 64. VMFL064: Low Reynolds Number Flow in a Channel with Sudden Asymmetric Expansion ................ 199 65. VMFL065: Swirling Turbulent Flow Inside a Diffuser ......................................................................... 201 66. VMFL066: Radiative Heat Transfer in a Rectangular Enclosure with Participating Medium ................. 203 67. VMFL067: Boiling in a Pipe-Critical Heat Flux .................................................................................. 205 68. VMFL068: Axial Flow in an Eccentric Annulus ................................................................................. 207 69. VMFL069: Two Phase Poiseulle Flow ............................................................................................... 209 70. VMFL070: Radiation Between Two Parallel Surfaces ......................................................................... 211

Part I: Verification Test Case Descriptions

Chapter 1: Introduction
The Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual presents a collection of test cases that demonstrate a representative set of the capabilities of the ANSYS Fluid Dynamics product suite. The primary purpose of this manual is to demonstrate a wide range of capabilities in straightforward problems that have "classical" or readily-obtainable theoretical solutions and in some cases have experimental data for comparison. The close agreement of the ANSYS solutions to the theoretical or experimental results in this manual is intended to provide user confidence in the ANSYS solutions. These problems may then serve as the basis for your additional validation and qualification of ANSYS capabilities for specific applications that may be of interest to you. This manual represents a small subset of the Quality Assurance test case library that is used in full when testing new versions of ANSYS FLUENT and ANSYS CFX. This test library and the test cases in this manual represent comparisons of ANSYS solutions with known theoretical solutions, experimental results, or other independently calculated solutions. Because ANSYS FLUENT and ANSYS CFX are programs capable of solving very complicated practical engineering problems having no closed-form theoretical solutions, the relatively simple problems solved in this manual do not illustrate the full capability of these ANSYS programs. The ANSYS software suite is continually being verified by the developers at ANSYS as new capabilities are added to the software. Verification of ANSYS products is conducted in accordance with written procedures that form a part of an overall Quality Assurance program at ANSYS, Inc.

Note
In order to solve test cases, you will require product licenses: ANSYS CFD, ANSYS FLUENT, or ANSYS CFX.

1.1. Expected Results

The test cases in this manual have been modeled to give reasonably accurate comparisons with a low number of elements and iterations. In some cases, even fewer elements and/or iterations will still yield an acceptable accuracy. The test cases employ a balance between accuracy and solution time. An attempt has been made to present a test case and results that are grid-independent. If test results are not gridindependent, it is due to the need to limit the run time for the test to be in the manual. Improved results can be obtained in some cases by refining the mesh, but this requires longer solution times. The ANSYS solutions in this manual are compared with solutions or experimental data from textbooks or technical publications. In some cases, the target (theoretical) answers reported in this manual may differ from those shown in the reference. In several fluid flow simulation problems where experimental results are available in the form of plots of the relevant parameters, the simulation results are also presented as plots so that the corresponding values can be compared on the same graph. Many of the fluid-dynamics simulation methods have to make use of data available from experimental measurements for their verification primarily because closed-form theoretical solutions are not available for modeling the related phenomena. In this manual several test cases for ANSYS FLUENT and ANSYS

Introduction CFX make use of experimental data published in reputed journals or conference proceedings for verification of the computational results. The experimental measurements for fluid-flow systems are often presented in the form of plots of the relevant parameters. Hence the published experimental data for those cases and the corresponding simulation results are presented in graphical format to facilitate comparison. Experimental data represent the "real world" physics reproduced in a controlled manner and provides more complex details of the flow field than theoretical solutions. The test cases in this manual have been modeled to give reasonably accurate comparisons with experimental data wherever applicable, with a low number of elements and iterations. Different computers and operating systems may yield slightly different results for some of the test cases in this manual due to numerical precision variation from machine to machine. Solutions that are nonlinear, iterative, or have convergence options activated are among the most likely to exhibit machinedependent numerical differences. Because of this, an effort has been made to report an appropriate and consistent number of significant digits in both the target and the ANSYS solution. If you run these test cases on your own computer hardware, be advised that an ANSYS result reported in this manual as 0.01234 may very well show up in your printout as 0.012335271.

1.2. References
The goal for the test cases contained in this manual was to have results accuracy within 3% of the target solution. The solutions for the test cases have been verified; however, certain differences may exist with regard to the references. These differences have been examined and are considered acceptable. It should be noted that only those items corresponding to the given theoretical solution values are reported for each problem. In most cases the same solution also contains a considerable amount of other useful numerical solution data. Different computers and different operating systems may yield slightly different results for some of the test cases in this manual, since numerical precision varies from machine to machine. Because of this, an effort has been made to report an appropriate and consistent number of significant digits in both the target and the ANSYS solution. These results reported in this manual are from runs on an Intel Xeon processor using Microsoft Windows XP Professional. Slightly different results may be obtained when different processor types or operating systems are used.

1.3. Using the Verification Manual and Test Cases

You are encouraged to use these tests as starting points when exploring features in these products. Geometries, material properties, loads, and output results can easily be changed and the solution repeated. As a result, the tests offer a quick introduction to new features with which you may be unfamiliar. The test cases in this manual are primarily intended for verification of the ANSYS programs. An attempt has been made to include most significant analysis capabilities of the ANSYS products in this manual. Although they are valuable as demonstration problems, the test cases are not presented as step-bystep examples with lengthy data input instructions and printouts. The reader should refer to the online help for complete input data instructions. Users desiring more detailed instructions for solving problems or in-depth treatment of specific topics should refer to the ANSYS FLUENT documentation. ANSYS FLUENT tutorials and ANSYS CFX tutorials are also available for various specific topics. These publications focus on particular features or program

Index of ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Test cases areas, supplementing other ANSYS reference documents with theory, procedures, guidelines, examples, and references.

1.4. Quality Assurance Services

For customers who may have further need for formal verification of the ANSYS products on their computers, ANSYS, Inc. offers the Quality Assurance Testing Agreement. You are provided with input data, output data, comparator software, and software tools for automating the testing and reporting process. If you are interested in contracting for such services, contact the ANSYS, Inc. Quality Assurance Group.

1.5. Index of ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Test cases

Dimensionality Column Key: 2: 2D 3: 3D A: 2D Axisymmetric

VMFL001 VMFL002 VMFL003 VMFL004 VMFL005 VMFL006 VMFL007 VMFL008 VMFL009 VMFL010 VMFL011 VMFL012 VMFL013 VMFL014 VMFL015 VMFL016 VMFL017 VMFL018 VMFL019 VMFL020

2 A A 2 A A A A 2 2 2 2 2 A 3 3 2 2 2 2 X X X X
5

X X

X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Introduction

VMFL021 VMFL022 VMFL023 VMFL024 VMFL025 VMFL026 VMFL027 VMFL028 VMFL029 VMFL030 VMFL031 VMFL032 VMFL033 VMFL034 VMFL035 VMFL036 VMFL037 VMFL038 VMFL039 VMFL040 VMFL041 VMFL042 VMFL043 VMFL044 VMFL045 VMFL046 VMFL047 VMFL048 VMFL049 VMFL050 VMFL051 VMFL052 VMFL053 VMFL054

A A 2 A A 3 2 A 2 3 2 A 2 2 3 A 2 2 A A 2 2 2 A 2 2 2 3 A 2 2 2 2 2 X X X X X

X X

X X X

X X X X X X X X X

X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Index of ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Test cases

VMFL055 VMFL056 VMFL057 VMFL058 VMFL059 VMFL060 VMFL061 VMFL062 VMFL063 VMFL064 VMFL065 VMFL066

2 2 2 A 2 2 2 2 2 2 A 2

X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X

X X X

VMFL001: Flow Between Rotating and Stationary Concentric Cylinders

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input Files F. M. White. Viscous Fluid Flow . Section 3-2.3. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.. New York, NY. 1991. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Laminar flow, rotating wall rot_conc_cyl.cas for ANSYS FLUENT rotating_cylinder.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Steady laminar flow between two concentric cylinders is modeled. The flow is induced by rotation of the inner cylinder with a constant angular velocity, while the outer cylinder is held stationary. Due to periodicity only a section of the domain needs to be modeled. In the present simulation a 180 segment (half of the domain shown in Figure 01.1: Flow Domain (p. 9)) is modeled. The sketch is not to scale. Figure 01.1: Flow Domain

y Outer Cylinder r2 r1 Inner Cylinder x

Material Properties Density = 1 kg/m3 Viscosity = 0.0002 kg/m-s

Geometry Radius of the Inner Cylinder = 17.8 mm Radius of the outer Cylinder = 46.8 mm

Boundary Conditions Angular velocity of the inner wall = 1 rad/s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. The tangential velocity at various sections can be calculated using analytical equations for laminar flow. These values are used for comparison with simulation results.

VMFL001

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 01.1: Comparison of Tangential Velocity in the Annulus at Various Radial Locations Tangential Velocity at r = 20 mm r = 25 mm r = 30 mm r = 35 mm Target Calculation, m/s 0.0151 0.0105 0.0072 0.0046 ANSYS FLUENT, m/s 0.0151 0.0105 0.0072 0.0045 0.999 0.996 0.990 0.979 Ratio

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 01.2: Comparison of Tangential Velocity in the Annulus at Various Radial Locations Location r = 20 mm r = 25 mm r = 30 mm r = 35 mm Target Calculation, m/s 0.0151 0.0105 0.0072 0.0046 ANSYS CFX, m/s 0.0150 0.0105 0.0071 0.0045 0.991 0.998 0.988 0.976 Ratio

VMFL002: Laminar Flow Through a Pipe with Uniform Heat Flux

Overview
Reference F. M. White. Fluid Mechanics . 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co.. New York, NY. 1994. F. P. Incropera and D. P. DeWitt. Fundamentals of Heat Transfer . John Wiley & Sons. 1981. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Laminar flow with heat transfer laminar-pipe-hotflow.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL002B_VV002CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Laminar flow of Mercury through a circular pipe is modeled, with uniform heat flux across the wall. A fully developed laminar velocity profile is prescribed at the inlet. The resulting pressure drop and exit temperature are compared with analytical calculations for Laminar flow. Only half of the 2D domain is modeled due to symmetry. Figure 02.1: Flow Domain

r=R r Pi Vx (r)
Material Properties Fluid: Mercury Density = 13529 kg/m
3

w (r)
Po

Geometry Length of the pipe = 0.1 m Radius of the pipe = 0.0025 m

Boundary Conditions Fully developed velocity profile at inlet. Inlet temperature = 300 K Heat Flux across wall = 5000 W/m2

Viscosity = 0.001523 kg/m-s Specific Heat = 139.3 J/kg-K Thermal Conductivity = 8.54 W/m-K

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady and incompressible. Pressure drop can be calculated from the theoretical expression for laminar flow given in Ref. 1. Correlations for temperature calculations are given in Ref. 2.

VMFL002

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 02.1: Comparison of Pressure Drop and Outlet Temperature Target Calculation Pressure Drop Centerline Temperature at the Outlet 1.000 Pa 341.00 K ANSYS FLUENT 0.999 Pa 340.50 K Ratio 0.999 0.999

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 02.2: Comparison of Pressure Drop and Outlet Temperature Target Calculation Pressure Drop Centerline Temperature at the Outlet 1.000 Pa 341.00 K ANSYS CFX 1.019 Pa 340.8 K Ratio 1.019 0.9994

VMFL003: Pressure Drop in Turbulent Flow through a Pipe

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File F. M. White. Fluid Mechanics . 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill Co.. New York, NY. 1994. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent flow, standard k- Model turb_pipe_flow.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL003B_VV003CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Air flows through a horizontal pipe with smooth walls. The flow Reynolds number is 1.37 X 104. Only half of the axisymmetrical domain is modeled. Figure 03.1: Flow Domain

P1 v Inlet

P2 Outlet

The figure is not to scale. Material Properties Density = 1.225 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1.7894 X 10-5 kg/m-s Geometry Length of the pipe = 2m Radius of the pipe = 0.002 m Boundary Conditions Inlet velocity = 50 m/s Outlet pressure = 0 Pa

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Pressure drop can be calculated from analytical formula using friction factor f which can be determined for the given Reynolds number from Moody chart. The calculated pressure drop is compared with the simulation results (pressure difference between inlet and outlet).

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 03.1: Comparison of Pressure Drop in the Pipe Target Calculation Pressure Drop 21789 Pa ANSYS FLUENT 21480 Pa Ratio 0.988

VMFL003

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 03.2: Comparison of Pressure Drop in the Pipe Target Calculation Pressure Drop 21789 Pa ANSYS CFX 21740 Pa Ratio 0.9975

VMFL004: Plain Couette Flow with Pressure Gradient

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input Files Munon, Young, Okiishi. Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics . 5th Edition. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Laminar flow, moving wall, periodic boundaries couette_flow.cas for ANSYS FLUENT Couette_Flow.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Viscous flow between two parallel plates is modeled. The top plate moves with a uniform velocity while the lower plate is fixed. A pressure gradient is imposed in a direction parallel to the plates. Figure 04.1: Flow Domain

Moving Wall Periodic Boundaries

Stationary Wall

Material Properties Density = 1 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1 kg/m-s

Geometry Length of the domain = 1.5 m Width of the domain = 1 m

Boundary Conditions Velocity of the moving wall = 3 m/s in X-direction For ANSYS FLUENT, pressure gradient across periodic boundaries = -12 Pa/m For ANSYS CFX, pressure gradient across periodic boundaries = -12 Pa/m (pressure change = 18 Pa)

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady and laminar. Periodic conditions with specified pressure drop are applied across the flux boundaries.
Release 14.5 - SAS IP, Inc. All rights reserved. - Contains proprietary and confidential information of ANSYS, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates. 15

VMFL004

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 04.2: Comparison of X-Velocity (m/s) at a Section Where X = 0.75 m

VMFL004

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 04.3: Comparison of X-Velocity (m/s) at a Section Where X = 0.75 m

VMFL005: Poiseuille Flow in a Pipe

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File F. M. White. Fluid Mechanics . 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co.. New York, NY. 1994. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Steady laminar flow poiseuille-flow.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL005B_VV005CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Fully developed laminar flow in a circular tube is modeled. Reynolds number based on the tube diameter is 500. Only half of the axisymmetric domain is modeled. Figure 05.1: Flow Domain
Pipe Wall Outlet

Inlet

Axis

Material Properties Density = 1 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1e-5 kg/m-s

Geometry Length of the pipe = 0.1 m Radius of the pipe = 0.00125 m

Boundary Conditions Fully developed laminar velocity profile at inlet with an average velocity of 2.00 m/s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. A fully developed laminar velocity profile is prescribed at the inlet. Hagen-Poiseuille equation is used to determine the pressure drop analytically.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 05.1: Comparison of Pressure Drop in the Pipe Target Calculation Pressure Drop 10. 24 Pa ANSYS FLUENT 10.22 Pa Ratio 0.998

VMFL005

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 05.2: Comparison of Pressure Drop in the Pipe Target Calculation Pressure Drop 10. 24 Pa ANSYS CFX 10.49 Pa Ratio 1.024

VMFL006: Multicomponent Species Transport in Pipe Flow

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File W. M. Kays and M. E. Crawford. Convective Heat and Mass Transfer . 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.. New York, NY. 126-134. 1993. ANSYS FLUENT (ANSYS CFX simulation is not available for this case) Steady laminar flow, species transport Species-diffusion.cas

Test Case
Fully developed laminar flow in a circular tube, with two species is modeled. Species A enters at the inlet and species B enters from the wall. Uniform and dissimilar mass fractions are specified at the pipe inlet and wall. Fluid properties are assumed to be the same for both species, so that computed results can be compared with analytical solution. Figure 06.1: Flow Domain
Inlet Axis Pipe Wall Outlet

Material Properties Species A Density = 1 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1.0 x 10 Pa-s Diffusivity m2/s Species B Density = 1 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1.0 x 10 Pa-s Diffusivity m2/s
AB -5 BA -5

Geometry Length of the pipe = 0.1 m Radius of the pipe = 0.0025 m

Boundary Conditions Fully developed laminar velocity profile at inlet with an average velocity of 1 m/s Mass fraction of species A at pipe inlet = 1.0 Mass fraction of species B at pipe inlet = 0.0 Mass fraction of species A at pipe wall = 0.0 Mass fraction of species B at pipe wall = 1.0

= 1.43 x 105

= 1.43 x 10-5

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. A fully developed laminar velocity profile is prescribed at the inlet. Species transport model is used.
Release 14.5 - SAS IP, Inc. All rights reserved. - Contains proprietary and confidential information of ANSYS, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates. 21

VMFL006

Results Comparison
Table 06.1: Comparison of Mass Fraction of Species A Along the Axis Axial location (m) 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 Target Calculation 0.8225 0.7308 0.6593 0.5992 0.5469 0.5006 0.4589 0.4212 0.3869 0.3555 ANSYS FLUENT 0.8223 0.7307 0.6592 0.5991 0.5469 0.5006 0.4591 0.4214 0.3871 0.3558 Ratio 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.001 1.001

VMFL007: Non-Newtonian Flow in a Pipe

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File W. F. Hughes and J. A. Brighton. Schaum's Outline of Theory and Problems of Fluid Dynamics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.. New York, NY. 1991. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Steady laminar flow, power law for viscosity powerlaw-visc.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL007B_vv007CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Flow of a non-Newtonian fluid in a circular pipe is modeled. Viscosity is specified by power law equation. Figure 07.1: Flow Domain
Inlet Axis Pipe Wall Outlet

Material Properties Density = 1000 kg/m3 Viscosity: Power law Parameters: k = 10 n = 0.4

Geometry Pipe length = 0.1 m Pipe diameter = 0.0025 m

Boundary Conditions Fully developed velocity profile at inlet with an average velocity of 2 m/s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Viscosity is specified using non-Newtonian power law equation.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 07.1: Comparison of Pressure Drop in the Pipe Target Calculation Pressure Drop 60.52 kPa ANSYS FLUENT 60.37 kPa Ratio 0.998

VMFL007

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 07.2: Comparison of Pressure Drop in the Pipe Target Calculation Pressure Drop 60.52 kPa ANSYS CFX 61.52 kPa Ratio 1.0165

VMFL008: Flow Inside a Rotating Cavity

Overview
Reference J. A. Michelsen. Modeling of Laminar Incompressible Rotating Fluid Flow . AFM 8605., Ph.D. thesis. Department of Fluid Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark. 1986. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Laminar flow, Rotating reference frame rotcv_RRF.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL008B_rot_cyl.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Flow in a cylindrical cavity enclosed with a lid that spins at = 1.0 rad/s. The flow field is 2D axisymmetric, so only the region bounded by the dashed lines in Figure 08.1: Flow Domain (p. 25)needs to be modeled. The Reynolds number of the flow based on the cavity radius R and the tip-speed of the disk is 1800. Figure 08.1: Flow Domain
Rotating Cover

L = 1.0 m R = 1.0 m = 1.0 rad/s

Region to be modeled

x y R

Material Properties Density = 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 0.000556 kg/ms

Geometry Height of the cavity = 1m Radius of cavity = 1m

Boundary Conditions Speed of rotation of the moving wall = 1rad/s Rotational velocity for cell zone = -1rad/s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is laminar. The problem is solved using rotating reference frame.

VMFL008

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 08.2: Comparison of Distribution of Radial Velocity Along a Section at X= 0.6 m

VMFL008 Figure 08.3: Comparison of Distribution of Swirl Velocity Along a Section at X= 0.6 m

VMFL008

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 08.4: Comparison of Distribution of Radial Velocity Along a Section at X= 0.6 m

Figure 08.5: Comparison of Distribution of Swirl Velocity Along a Section at X= 0.6 m

VMFL009: Natural Convection in a Concentric Annulus

Overview
Reference Kuehn, T.H. and Goldstein, R.J., An Experimental Study of Natural Convection Heat Transfer in Concentric and Eccentric Horizontal Cylindrical Annuli, Journal of Heat Transfer, 100:635-640, 1978. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Heat transfer, natural convection, laminar flow concn.cas for ANSYS FLUENT ecc_cfx.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input Files

Test Case
Natural convection inside a concentric annular domain. The inner wall is maintained at a higher temperature than the outer wall, thereby causing buoyancy induced circulation. Figure 09.1: Flow Domain

Top Plane of Symmetry Bottom Plane of Symmetry

Only half of the domain is modeled due to symmetry. Material Properties Density: Incompressible ideal gas Viscosity: 2.081 X 10 kg/m-s
-5

Geometry Radius of outer cylinder = 46.25 mm Radius of inner cylinder = 17.8 mm

Boundary Conditions Inner wall temperature = 373 K Outer wall temperature = 327 K

Specific Heat: 1008 J/kg-K

VMFL009 Material Properties Thermal Conductivity: 0.02967 W/m-K Geometry Boundary Conditions

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is symmetric and only half of the domain is modeled. Density is calculated based on incompressible ideal gas assumption. The flow is laminar.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 09.2: Comparison of Static Temperature Distribution on the Bottom Wall of Symmetry

VMFL009 Figure 09.3: Comparison of Static Temperature Distribution on the Top Wall of Symmetry

VMFL009

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 09.4: Comparison of Static Temperature Distribution on the Bottom Wall of Symmetry

VMFL010: Laminar Flow in a 90 Tee-Junction.

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File R.E. Hayes, K. Nandkumar, and H. Nasr-El-Din. Steady Laminar Flow in a 90 Degree Planar Branch . Computers and Fluids, 17(4). 537-553. 1989. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Laminar flow plarb_r4.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL010B_plarb.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
The purpose of this test is to compare prediction of the fractional flow in a dividing tee-junction with experimental results. The fluid enters through the bottom branch and divides into the two channels whose exit planes are held at the same static pressure.

VMFL010 Figure 10.1: Flow Domain P s= 0

L w P s= 0

2/3 L

v Table 10.1: Comparison of Flow Split from Tee Material Properties Fluid: Air Density : 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 0.003333 kg/m-s Geometry L=3.0 m W=1.0 m Boundary Conditions

Fully developed inlet velocity profile for: where is the inlet centerline velocity.
=

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady and incompressible. Pressure based solver is used. It is seen that with increasing flow rate in the main channel, less fluid escapes through the secondary (right) branch. For analysis of results, we calculate and compare the fractional flow in the upper branch.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 10.2: Comparison of Flow Split from Tee Target Flow split
34

ANSYS FLUENT 0.884

Ratio 0.997

0.887

VMFL010

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 10.3: Comparison of Flow Split from Tee Target Flow split 0.887 ANSYS CFX 0.8837 Ratio 0.9962

VMFL011: Laminar flow in a Triangular Cavity

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input Files R. Jyotsna and S.P. Vanka. Multigrid Calculation of Steady, Viscous Flow in a Triangular Cavity . J. Comp. Phys., 122. 107-117. 1995. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Viscous flow, driven by a moving wall driv.cas for FLUENT driven_cavity.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Laminar flow induced by the motion of the top wall of a triangular cavity (Figure 11.1: Flow Domain (p. 37)). The side walls are stationary. Figure 11.1: Flow Domain

U wall = 2 m/s

h=4m

Material Properties Density = 1 kg/m

Geometry Height of the triangular cavity =4m Width of the base = 2 m

Boundary Conditions Velocity of the top (base) wall = 2 m/s Other walls are stationary

Viscosity = 0.01 kg/m-s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Pressure based solver is used. A hybrid mesh with triangular and quadrilateral cells is used to discretize the domain.

VMFL011

Results Comparison for FLUENT

Figure 11.2: Comparison of Distribution of Normalized X-Velocity Along a Vertical Line that Bisects the Base of the Cavity

In this figure, X-velocity is normalized by the velocity of the moving wall.

VMFL011

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 11.3: Comparison of Distribution of Normalized X-Velocity Along a Vertical Line that Bisects the Base of the Cavity

In this figure also the X-velocity is normalized by the velocity of the moving wall.

VMFL012: Turbulent Flow in a Wavy Channel

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File J.D. Kuzan. Velocity Measurements for Turbulent Separated and Near-Separated Flows Over Solid Waves . Ph.D. thesis. Dept. Chem. Eng., Univ. Illinois. Urbana, IL. 1986. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent internal flow with separation and recirculation, periodic boundaries wavy.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL012B_VV012.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
A periodic flow domain bounded on one side by a sinusoidal wavy wall and with a straight wall on the other side. Due to periodicity only a part of the channel needs to modeled. Figure 12.1: Flow Domain (p. 41) depicts the channel geometry. Flow direction is from left to right. Figure 12.1: Flow Domain

Periodic Boundaries D=1m h = 0.9 m H = 1.1 m

0.25 m 0.75 m
Material Properties Density = 1 kg/m3 Viscosity = 0.0001 kg/m-s Geometry Amplitude of the sinusoidal wave = 0. 1m Wave length = 1 m Length of the periodic segment = 1 m Pressure Gradient = 0.01687141 Pa/m Boundary Conditions Periodic Conditions: Mass flow rate = 0.816 kg/S

VMFL012

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Pressure based solver is used. Periodic boundaries are used. For analysis of results, velocity in the x direction is normalized by the mean mainstream velocity, U = 0.816 m/s, at mean channel height.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 12.2: Comparison of Distribution of Normalized X-Velocity along Transverse Direction at the Wave Crest

VMFL012 Figure 12.3: Comparison of Predicted Normalized X-Velocity along Transverse Direction at the Wave Trough

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 12.4: Comparison of Distribution of Normalized X-Velocity along Transverse Direction at the Wave Crest

VMFL012 Figure 12.5: Comparison of Predicted Normalized X-Velocity along Transverse Direction at the Wave Trough

VMFL013: Turbulent Flow with Heat Transfer in a Backward-Facing Step

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File J.C.Vogel and J.K. Eaton. Combined Heat Transfer and Fluid Dynamic Measurements Downstream of a Backward-Facing Step . J. Heat Transfer. Vol. 107. 922-929. 1985. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Incompressible, turbulent flow with heat convection and reattachment. step_ve.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL013B_vv013.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
The fluid flow and convective heat transfer over a 2D backward-facing step is modeled. A constant heat-flux surface behind the sudden expansion leads to a separated and reattaching boundary layer that disturbs local heat transfer. Measured values of the distribution of the local Nusselt number along the heated wall are used to validate the CFD simulation. Figure 13.1: Flow Domain

adiabatic walls

Q (heated wall) H

3.8 H

30 H

Material Properties for Dry Air Density = 1 kg/m3 Viscosity = 0.0001 kg/m-s H=1m

Geometry

Boundary Conditions Velocity profile at inlet corresponding to ReH = 28,000 Wall heat transfer, Q = 1,000 W/m2

Conductivity = 1.408 W/m-K Specific Heat = 10,000 J/kgK

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

A Cartesian non-uniform 121 x 61 mesh is used. The flow is steady and incompressible. Fluid properties are considered constant. Pressure based solver is used. The inlet boundary conditions are specified using the fully-developed profiles for the U-velocity, k, and epsilon. The incoming boundary layer thickness is 1.1 H. Under the given pressure conditions, the Reynolds number, ReH is about 28,000 The RNG k- model with standard wall functions is used for accounting turbulence.

VMFL013

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 13.2: Comparison of Predicted Local Nusselt Number Distribution Along the Heated Wall with Experimental Data

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 13.3: Comparison of Predicted Local Nusselt Number Distribution Along the Heated Wall with Experimental Data

VMFL014: Species Mixing in Co-axial Turbulent Jets

Overview
Reference R.W. Schefer and R.W. Dibble. Simultaneous Measurements of Velocity and Density in a Turbulent Non-premixed Flame . AIAA Journal, 23. 10701078. 1985. R.W. Schefer. Data Base for a Turbulent, Nonpremixed, Nonreacting PropaneJet Flow . http://www.sandia.gov/TNF/DataArch/ProJet.html ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Multi-Species flow, turbulent , jet mixing san_jet.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL014B_san_jet.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
A propane jet issues into a co-axial stream of air. There is turbulent mixing between the species in the axisymmetric tunnel. Only half of the domain is considered due to axial symmetry. Figure 14.1: Flow Domain

D = 0.3 m

L=2m

C3 H8 air air d o = 11 mm d i = 5.2 mm

Material Properties Density: Incompressible ideal gas law

Geometry Tunnel length = 2 m

Boundary Conditions Inlet velocity of air = 9.2 m/s

VMFL014 Material Properties Viscosity: 1.72X105 kg/m-s Geometry Tunnel diameter = 0.3 m Propane jet tube: Inner diameter = 5.2 mm Outer diameter = 11 mm Boundary Conditions Inlet velocity of Propane Specified as fully developed profile Inlet temperature (both streams) = 300 K Temperature at the wall = 300 K

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Species mixing is modeled with the three species; propane, oxygen, and nitrogen. There is no reaction.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 14.2: Comparison of Distribution of Propane Along Axis of the Jets

VMFL014 Figure 14.3: Comparison of Distribution of X-Velocity Along Axis of the Jets

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 14.4: Comparison of Distribution of Propane Along Axis of the Jets

VMFL014 Figure 14.5: Comparison of Distribution of X-Velocity Along Axis of the Jets

VMFL015: Flow Through an Engine Inlet Valve

Overview
Reference A. Chen, K.C. Lee, M. Yianneskis, and G. Ganti. Velocity Characteristics of Steady Flow Through a Straight Generic Inlet Port . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 21. 571-590. 1995. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX 3D turbulent flow valve10.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL017B_VV017.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Flow in an idealized engine cylinder with a straight inlet port and a valve lift of 10 mm (the distance from the top of the cylinder to the bottom of the valve). The configuration of the inlet port, valve, and cylinder is shown in Figure 15.1: Flow Domain (p. 51). Figure 15.1: Flow Domain
flow inlet 1.379 kg/s

39.5

10 43.0

562

93.65
flow exit

VMFL015 Material Properties Density : 894 kg/m3 Viscosity: 0.001529 kg/m-s Geometry All dimensions shown in Figure 15.1: Flow Domain (p. 51) are in mm. Boundary Conditions Inlet velocity = 0.9282 m/s Inlet turbulent intensity = 10% Inlet turbulent length scale = 0.046m Outlet gauge pressure = 0 Pa

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady, isothermal and incompressible. The standard k- model with standard wall functions is used. The length of the cylinder is chosen to be large enough that it will not affect the flow in the cylinder.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 15.2: Z-Velocity Component at Z= -5mm (p. 52) and Figure 15.3: Z-Velocity Component at Z = +10mm (p. 53) compare ANSYS FLUENT's results with the experimental data (z-component of velocity at different heights). Figure 15.2: Z-Velocity Component at Z= -5mm

VMFL015 Figure 15.3: Z-Velocity Component at Z = +10mm

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 15.4: Z-Velocity Component at Z= -5mm

VMFL015 Figure 15.5: Z-Velocity Component at Z = +10mm

VMFL016: Turbulent Flow in a Transition Duct

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input Files D.O. Davis and F.B. Gessner. Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Flow Through a Circular-to-Rectangular Transition Duct . AIAA Journal, 30(2). 367-375. 1992. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX 3D Turbulent flow with separation, Reynolds stress model tranduct-rsm-1.cas for ANSYS FLUENT transition_duct.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Turbulent flow through a circular-to-rectangular transition duct having the same inlet and outlet crosssectional areas is modeled. The curvature of the duct walls induces a strong pressure-driven cross-flow that develops into a counter-rotating vortex pair near the short side walls of the duct. Due to symmetry of the flow field, only one fourth of the duct is modeled (as shown in Figure 16.1: Flow Domain (p. 55)). Station 5 is located 23 m downstream of the inlet. Figure 16.1: Flow Domain
Station 5

Inlet

Outlet

Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 5.13X106 kg/m-s

Geometry Inlet radius = 1 m Length of duct = 35 m

Boundary Conditions Inlet velocity: 1 m/s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) is used to model turbulence.

VMFL016

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 16.2: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient at Station 5

VMFL016 Figure 16.3: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient Along Centerline of the Duct

VMFL016

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 16.4: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient Along Centerline of the Duct

VMFL017: Transonic Flow over an RAE 2822 Airfoil

Overview
Reference P.H. Cook, M.A. McDonald, and M.C.P. Firmin. AEROFOIL RAE 2822 Pressure Distribution and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements . AGARD Advisory Report. No. 138. 1979. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Compressible, turbulent flow r2822.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL017B_VV017.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Flow over an RAE 2822 airfoil at a free-stream Mach number of 0.73. The angle of attack is 2.79. The flow field is 2D, compressible (transonic), and turbulent. The geometry of the RAE 2822 airfoil is shown in Figure 17.1: Geometry of the RAE 2822 Airfoil (p. 59). It is a thick airfoil with a chord length, c, of 1.00 m and a maximum thickness, d, of 0.121 m. The domain extends 55c from the airfoil, so that the presence of the airfoil is not felt at the outer boundary. Figure 17.1: Geometry of the RAE 2822 Airfoil
x

0.121 m

1.00 m Mach Number = 0.73 Re = 6.5 x 10^6 Angle of Attack = 2.79 degrees Static Pressure = 43765 Inlet Temperature = 300 K Turbulent Intensity =0.05% Turbulent Viscosity Ratio = 10

Material Properties Fluid: Air Density: Ideal Gas Viscosity: 1.983x10-5 kg/m-s Thermal conductivity: 0.0242 W/m-K Molecular Weight: 28.966 Specific Heat: 1006.43 J/kg-K

Geometry Chord length = 1 m Maximum thickness = 0.121 m

Boundary Conditions The inlet conditions are: Mach number = 0.73 Re = 6.5 x 106 Static pressure = 43765 Pa Inlet temperature = 300 K

VMFL017 Material Properties Geometry Boundary Conditions Turbulent intensity = 0.05 % Turbulent viscosity ratio = 10

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The implicit formulation of the density-based solver is used. The SST k- turbulence model is used to account for turbulence effects. The problem is solved in steady state mode.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 17.1: Comparison of Coefficients Coefficients Drag Lift Target 0.0168 0.803 ANSYS FLUENT 0.0165 0.783 Ratio 0.982 0.975

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 17.2: Comparison of Coefficients Coefficients Drag Lift Target 0.0168 0.803 ANSYS CFX 0.0165 0.7825 Ratio 0.982 0.974

VMFL018: Shock Reflection in Supersonic Flow

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File H. B. Hopkins, W. Konopka, and J. Leng. Validation of scramjet exhaust simulation technique at Mach 6. NASA Contractor Report 3003. 1979. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Reflecting shocks in supersonic flow; Compressible turbulent flow scram-nozzle-flow.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL018B_VV018.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Supersonic flow from a nozzle that represents the exhaust nozzle of a supersonic combustion ramjet (SCRAMJET) is modeled. Jet from the nozzle is issued into a domain which is bounded on one side by an afterbody wall which is parallel to the centerline of the nozzle. Shocks propagating from the nozzle exit reflect from the afterbody. Measured values of (i) the distribution of wall pressure and (ii) heat transfer rate along the afterbody are used to validate the CFD simulation. Figure 18.1: Flow Domain

cowl wall

D=1.524 cm

M=1.66 P=Pe To=477.8 K Tw=328 K

afterbody

Material Properties Density: Ideal Gas Molecular Weight: 113.2 Viscosity: 1.7894 X 10-5 kg/m-s Thermal Conductivity: 0.0242 w/m-K Specific Heat: Temperature Dependent

Geometry D = 1.524 cm Length of cowl = 3.5 D

Boundary Conditions Inlet Total Pressure (gauge) = 551600 Pa Inlet Static Pressure (gauge) = 127100 Pa Inlet Total Temperature = 477.8 K Inlet Turbulent Intensity = 2 % Wall temperature = 328 K Outlet Pressure (gauge) = 2780 Pa

VMFL018

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Specific heat is defined as a linear function of temperature. Density based solver is used. Under the given pressure conditions, the inlet Mach number is about 1.66.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 18.2: Comparison of Predicted Static Pressure Distribution on the Afterbody with Experimental Data

VMFL018 Figure 18.3: Comparison of Predicted Total Heat Flux Along the Afterbody with Experimental Data

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 18.4: Comparison of Predicted Static Pressure Distribution on the Afterbody with Experimental Data

VMFL018 Figure 18.5: Comparison of Predicted Total Heat Flux Along the Afterbody with Experimental Data

VMFL019: Transient Flow near a Wall Set in Motion

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File Boundary Layer Theory, H. Schlichting & K. Gersten, 8th Edition, 1999; Page 126-127. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Unsteady flow, moving wall VMFL019_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL019_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Flow near a wall suddenly set into motion is modeled. The start up flow is modeled as a transient problem with a constant wall-velocity at t (time) > 0. The flow is highly viscous and the velocity is 0 at t= 0. Figure 19.1: Flow Domain

Fixed Wall

Inlet

Outlet

Moving Wall

Material Properties Density = 1000 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1 kg/m-s

Geometry Dimensions of the domain: 0.75 m X 0.3 m

Boundary Conditions Velocity of the moving wall = 0.02 m/s Gauge Pressure at Inlet = 0 N/m2 Gauge Pressure at Outlet = 0 N/m2

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The pressure based solver is used in ANSYS FLUENT. Pressure boundaries are specified to model the driving head in the direction of flow. The fluid is at rest initially (t = 0). The similarity parameter is defined as: (

)
Release 14.5 - SAS IP, Inc. All rights reserved. - Contains proprietary and confidential information of ANSYS, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates. 65

VMFL019 Where is the kinematic viscosity.

Results Comparison using ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 19.2: Comparison of Velocity Profile Near the Wall at Outlet

Results Comparison using ANSYS CFX

Figure 19.3: Comparison of Velocity Profile Near the Wall at Outlet

VMFL020: Adiabatic Compression of Air in Cylinder by a Reciprocating Piston

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File L. D. Russell and G. A. Adebiyi. Classical Thermodynamics . Saunders College Publishing. Philadelphia, PA (Now Oxford University Press). 1993. ANSYS FLUENT (ANSYS CFX simulation is not available for this case) Dynamic Mesh, Transient flow with ideal gas effects box2d_remesh.cas

Test Case
Air undergoes adiabatic compression due to the movement of a piston inside a rectangular box, representing a cylinder geometry in 2D as shown in Figure 20.1: In-Cylinder Piston Description (p. 67). The Top Dead Center (TDC) corresponds to a crank angle of 360. The piston moves back after reaching TDC. Figure 20.1: In-Cylinder Piston Description

crank angle

VMFL020 Figure 20.2: Flow Domain

TDC

10 m

BDC

PISTON
Material Properties Ideal gas law for density Viscosity = 1.7894 X 105 kg/m-s Geometry Length of the block = 10 m Width of the block = 8m Boundary Conditions Movement of the piston modeled using deforming mesh

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The compression within the cylinder is assumed to be adiabatic. The Spring-based smoothing method with local remeshing is used for modeling the dynamic mesh motion.

VMFL020

Results Comparison
Figure 20.3: Comparison of Static Temperature Variation with Time

Figure 20.4: Comparison of Static Pressure Variation with Time

VMFL021: Cavitation over a Sharp-Edged Orifice Case A: High Inlet Pressure

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File W.H. Nurick. Orifice Cavitation and Its Effects on Spray Mixing . Journal of Fluids Eng.. Vol.98. 681-687. 1976. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent multiphase flow with cavitation and phase change cav_orifice_HP.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL021B_VV021.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
A steady, axisymmetric, multiphase (water/steam) flow, with phase change taking place. Due to sudden contraction a low pressure region occurs near the sharp edge which results in cavitation. Figure 21.1: Flow Domain (p. 71)depicts the orifice geometry. Flow direction is from left to right. Figure 21.1: Flow Domain
L1 L2

vapor liquid jet P2 r2

Material Properties Liquid: Water Density : 1000 kg/m3 Viscosity: 0.001 kg/m-s Gas: Water-Vapor Density: 0.02558 kg/m3

Geometry L1 = 1.60 cm L2 = 3.20 cm r1 = 1.15 cm

Boundary Conditions P1 = 250,000,000 Pa P2 = 95,000 Pa T = 300 K Pvapor = 3,540 Pa

VMFL021 Material Properties Viscosity: 1.26x10-6 kg/m-s Geometry r2 = 0.40 cm Boundary Conditions

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady and incompressible. Pressure based solver is used. Standard k- model with standard wall functions is used for turbulence. The Zwart-Gerber-Belamri cavitation model is applied together with mixture multiphase model. For analysis of results, we calculate and compare the discharge coefficient with the experimental data. The coefficient of discharge, , is the ratio of the mass flow rate through the nozzle to the theoretical maximum mass flow rate:

=

In the above equation, is the mass flow rate as calculated by the CFD solver.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 21.1: Comparison of Discharge Coefficient Target Coefficient of Discharge 0.620 ANSYS FLUENT 0.631 Ratio 1.018

VMFL021 Figure 21.2: Contours of Liquid (Water) Volume Fraction

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 21.2: Comparison of Discharge Coefficient Target Coefficient of Discharge 0.620 ANSYS CFX 0.6429 Ratio 1.037

VMFL022: Cavitation over a Sharp-Edged Orifice Case B: Low Inlet Pressure

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File W.H. Nurick. Orifice Cavitation and Its Effects on Spray Mixing . Journal of Fluids Eng.. Vol.98. 681-687. 1976. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent multiphase flow with cavitation and phase change cav_orifice_LP.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL022B_VV022.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
A steady, axisymmetric, multiphase (water/steam) flow, with phase change taking place. Due to sudden contraction a low pressure region occurs near the sharp edge which results in a weak cavitation. Figure 22.1: Flow Domain (p. 75) depicts the orifice geometry. Flow direction is from left to right. Figure 22.1: Flow Domain
L1 L2

vapor liquid jet P2 r2

Material Properties Liquid: Water Density: 1000 kg/m3 Viscosity: 0.001 kg/m-s Gas: Water-Vapor Density: 0.02558 kg/m3

Geometry L1 = 1.60 cm L2 = 3.20 cm r1 = 1.15 cm

Boundary Conditions P1 = 250,000 Pa P2 = 95,000 Pa T = 300 K Pvapor = 3,540 Pa

VMFL022 Material Properties Viscosity: 1.26x10-6 kg/m-s Geometry r2 = 0.40 cm Boundary Conditions

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

=

In the above equation, is the mass flow rate as calculated by the CFD solver.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 22.1: Comparison of Discharge Coefficient Target Coefficient of Discharge 0.780 ANSYS FLUENT 0.777 Ratio 0.996

VMFL022 Figure 22.2: Contours of Liquid (Water) Volume Fraction

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 22.2: Comparison of Discharge Coefficient Target Coefficient of Discharge 0.780 ANSYS CFX 0.8051 Ratio 1.032

VMFL023: Oscillating Laminar Flow Around a Circular Cylinder

Overview
Reference F. M. White. Fluid Mechanics . 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co.. New York, NY. 1994. S.J. Kim and C.M. Lee. Numerical Investigation of Cross-Flow Around a Circular Cylinder at a Low-Reynolds Number Flow Under an Electromagnetic Force . KSME International Journal. Vol 16. No. 3. 363-375. 2002. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Laminar, transient flow cyl_2d.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL023B_osc_cyl.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
The purpose of this case is to validate the ability of ANSYS FLUENT and ANSYS CFX to predict the flow structure as well as the reattachment length and Strouhal number against experimental results. The present calculations are confined to the low-Reynolds-number regime (Re = 100), which encompasses unsteady asymmetric flow. Figure 23.1: Flow Domain

D Flow U = 1 m/s 10D 20D

Table 23.1: Materials, Geometry, and Boundary Conditions Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m
3

Geometry Diameter of the cylinder =2m

Boundary Conditions U

= 1 m/s

Viscosity: 0.02 kg/m-s

VMFL023

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is laminar, and unsteady. An FFT analysis of the lift coefficient on the cylinder wall is presented to determine the frequency of oscillations. The Strouhal number corresponding to the maximum magnitude of oscillations is presented in the Table below.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

The formula for the Strouhal number is S = (N * D)/U, where N is the frequency, D is the diameter of the cylinder, and U is the freestream velocity. Table 23.2: Predicted Strouhal Number for Re = 100 Target Strouhal Number 0.165 ANSYS FLUENT 0.173 Ratio 1.048

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 23.3: Predicted Strouhal Number for Re = 100 Target Strouhal Number 0.165 ANSYS CFX 0.172 Ratio 1.040

VMFL024: Interface of Two Immiscible Liquids in a Rotating Cylinder

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File T. Sugimoto and M. Iguchi. Behavior of Immiscible Two Liquid Layers Contained in Cylindrical Vessel Suddenly Set in Rotation . ISIJ Int., 42. 338-343. 2002. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Multiphase (Volume of Fluid), transient flow, body force rot-cyl_2liq_vof.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL024B_rot_cyl.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Laminar interface between two immiscible liquids, water and silicon oil, inside a vertical cylinder which is set in rotation starting from a state of rest. The silicone oil layer rests on top of the water due to its lower density. The cylinder is sealed at the top. The vessel is set to rotate with a constant angular velocity. Figure 24.1: Flow Domain

Hso

Silicone Oil

120 mm

Water

46 mm

Table 24.1: Materials, Geometry, and Boundary Conditions Material Properties Water : Geometry Diameter of the cylinder = 46mm Boundary Conditions All walls are set up at rotational speed of 2.39577 rad/s

VMFL024 Material Properties Density: 1030 kg/m

Geometry Height of the cylinder = 120 mm

Boundary Conditions

Viscosity: 0.00103 kg/m-s Silicon Oil: Density: 935 kg/m3 Viscosity: 0.0103 kg/m-s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is laminar, unsteady and axisymmetric. Non-dimensionalized swirl velocity, defined as Swirl velocity / (Rotational speed X Cylinder radius) is used to validate the results.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 24.2: Comparison of the Non-Dimensional Swirl Velocity at Various Radial Locations (for a Given Axial Location, X = 20mm) at Time t = 80 s Radial locations (at x = 20 mm) 4.83 mm 9.43 mm 14.26 mm Target 0.21 0.41 0.62 ANSYS FLUENT 0.2093 0.4109 0.6221 Ratio 0.997 1.002 1.003

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 24.3: Comparison of the Non-Dimensional Swirl Velocity at Various Radial Locations (for a Given Axial Location, X = 20mm) at Time t = 80 s Radial locations (at x = 20 mm) 4.83 mm 9.43 mm 14.26 mm Target 0.21 0.41 0.62 ANSYS CFX 0.2093 0.4109 0.6221 Ratio 0.997 1.002 1.003

VMFL025: Turbulent Non-Premixed Methane Combustion with Swirling Air

Overview
Reference P.A.M. Kalt, Y.M. Al-Abdeli, A.R. Masri, and R.S. Barlow . Swirling turbulent non-premixed flames of methane: Flow field and compositional structure . Proc. Combust. Inst., 29. 1913-1919. 2002. Y.M. Al-Abdeli and A.R. Masri. Stability Characteristics and Flow Fields of Turbulent Swirling Jet Flows . Combust. Theory and Modeling, 7. 731-766. 2003. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent swirling flow with reaction, non-premixed combustion model, Radiation heat transfer, Discrete ordinates method non-premix_17k-final.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL025B_CFX for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Air and Methane enter as separate streams into an annular chamber. Air issues as a swirling jet and also as a separate co-flowing stream with axial velocity. Both the air streams are free of methane. Species mixing and combustion take place in the axisymmetric chamber. Radiative heat transfer is taken into account. Figure 25.1: Flow Domain
co-flowing air inlet swirling air inlet outlet

axis

methane inlet

Material Properties Species mixture properties specified through PDF file Viscosity: 1.72 x 10 kg/m-s
-05

Geometry The fuel (methane only) inlet has a diameter of 3.6 mm. The air inlet for the annular shroud has an inner diameter of 50mm and an outer diameter of 60 mm. Co-flowi ng air inlet has an outer diameter of 310 mm.

Boundary Conditions Methane inlet velocity: 32.7 m/s Axial velocity of swirling air: 38.2 m/s Swirl velocity of air: 19.1 m/s Co-flowing air velocity: 20 m/s

Refractive Index = 1

VMFL025 Material Properties Geometry Boundary Conditions Walls are adiabatic

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Realizable k- is used to model turbulence. Discrete ordinates method used to model radiation. The walls are treated as adiabatic. Non-premixed combustion model is used to model reactions.

Results Comparison ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 25.2: Comparison of Axial Velocity at X = 40mm

VMFL025 Figure 25.3: Comparison of Swirl Velocity at X = 40mm

VMFL025 Figure 25.4: Comparison of Temperature at X = 40mm

VMFL025 Figure 25.5: Comparison of Mass Fraction of CO at X = 40mm

VMFL025

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 25.6: Comparison of Axial Velocity at X = 40mm

Figure 25.7: Comparison of Swirl Velocity at X = 40mm

VMFL025 Figure 25.8: Comparison of Temperature at X = 40mm

Figure 25.9: Comparison of Mass Fraction of CO at X = 40mm

VMFL026: Supersonic Flow with Real Gas Effects inside a Shock Tube

Overview
Reference K. Mohamed and M. Paraschivoiu. Real Gas Numerical Simulation of Hydrogen Flow . 2nd International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference. Providence, Rhode Island. Aug. 16-19, 2004. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Transient Compressible flow, Real Gas effects, Shock realgas_shock-tube.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL026B_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Transient flow inside a hydrogen filled shock tube is modeled. A diaphragm separating regions of high and low pressures ruptures at t = 0 thereby creating a shock wave in the tube. Figure 26.1: Flow Domain

L = 1.0 m 2 Area = 0.01 m

Table 26.1: Materials, Geometry, and Boundary Conditions Material Properties Density is specified using the Aungier-Redlich-Kwong real gas model Geometry Length of the tube = 1 m Area of cross section = 0.01 m2 Boundary Conditions Cell zone conditions are specified with high pressure and low pressure properties of hydrogen

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is compressible and unsteady by nature. Real gas effects are significant in the pressure range considered here.
Release 14.5 - SAS IP, Inc. All rights reserved. - Contains proprietary and confidential information of ANSYS, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates. 91

VMFL026

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 26.2: Comparison of Static Temperature Along Centerline of the Tube

Figure 26.3: Comparison of Static Pressure Along Centerline of the Tube

VMFL026

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 26.4: Comparison of Static Temperature Along Centerline of the Tube

Figure 26.5: Comparison of Static Pressure Along Centerline of the Tube

VMFL027: Turbulent Flow over a Backward-Facing Step

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File D.M. Driver and H.L. Seegmiller. "Features of a Reattaching Turbulent Shear Layer in Divergent Channel Flow". AIAA Journal. Vol. 23, No. 2. 163-171. Feb. 1985. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX 2-D turbulent flow with separation and reattachment, realizable k- model drivseeg-rke-neqwf.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL027B_step.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Turbulent flow over a backward facing step is modeled. The flow separates at the step and reattaches on the wall downstream, enclosing a region of recirculation. The inlet is at 4 H upstream and the outlet at 30 H downstream from the location of the step, where H is the step height. Reynolds number based on the step-height is about 28,000. Figure 27.1: Flow Domain

Inlet

Outlet

Step

Table 27.1: Materials, Geometry, and Boundary Conditions Material Properties Density : 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 0.0001 kg/m-s Geometry Step height = 1m Total length of the channel = 34 m Height of the channel = 9 m Boundary Conditions Inlet velocity specified as fully developed turbulent velocity profile

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Realizable k- model was used to model turbulence.

VMFL027

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 27.2: Comparison of Skin Friction Coefficient Along the Wall

VMFL027

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 27.3: Comparison of Skin Friction Coefficient Along the Wall

VMFL028: Turbulent Heat Transfer in a Pipe Expansion

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File Baughn et al.. Local Heat Transfer Downstream of an Abrupt Expansion in a Circular Channel With Constant Wall Heat Flux . Journal of Heat Transfer, 106. 789-796. 1984. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Heat transfer, turbulent flow with recirculation and reattachment bghnexp.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL028B_pipe_expansion.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Fully developed turbulent flow through an axisymmetric pipe expansion is modeled. The flow reattaches to the pipe wall downstream of the expansion, enclosing a zone of recirculation. The pipe wall downstream of the expansion is heated at a constant rate. Inlet to the computational domain is placed at 1 step height upstream of the expansion and the outlet at 40 step-heights downstream. Figure 28.1: Flow Domain
q = 0 W/m 2 q = 0.3 W/m 2

H=1m R velocity inlet H x r axis

pressure outlet

40 H

Material Properties Density: 1.225 kg/m3 Viscosity: 1.68318e-5kg/m-s Specific Heat: 1006.43 J/kg-K Thermal Conductivity: 0.0242 W/m-K

Geometry Pipe radius before expansion = 0.667 m Pipe radius after expansion = 1.6667 m

Boundary Conditions Inlet velocity: Specified by fully developed turbulent velocity profile Inlet temperature = 273 K Heat flux across the wall after expansion = 0.3 W/m2

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Steady flow in axisymmetric domain. The wall upstream of expansion is adiabatic.

VMFL028

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 28.2: Nusselts Number Variation along the Heat Wall

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 28.3: Nusselts Number Variation along the Heat Wall

100

VMFL029: Anisotropic Conduction Heat Transfer

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File ANSYS FLUENT (ANSYS CFX simulation is not available for this case) Heat conduction, anisotropic conductivity aniso.cas

Test Case
Heat conduction in a solid with anisotropic thermal conductivity is modeled. A square domain is considered. Two opposite walls are maintained at uniform temperatures. Conductivity of the solid material is specified using matrix components to account for the anisotropy. The simulation results are compared with analytical solution for temperature distribution. Figure 29.1: Domain

Material Properties Density of solid = 2719 kg/m

Geometry Dimensions of the domain: 1m X 1 m

Boundary Conditions Fixed wall temperatures = 100 K and 200K respectively User-defined profile for temperature distribution on the other two walls

Specific heat = 871 J/kg-K Thermal conductivity: Anisotropic

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Steady state conduction. Anisotropic conductivity modeled by specified matrix components for the solid conductivity.

101

VMFL029

Results Comparison
Figure 29.2: Comparison of Temperature Distribution at X = 0.5 m

102

VMFL030: Turbulent Flow in a 90 Pipe-Bend

Overview
Reference M. M. Enayet, M. M. Gibson, A. M. K. P. Taylor, and M. Yianneskis. Laser-Doppler Measurements of Laminar and Turbulent Flow in a Pipe Bend . Znt. J. Heat & Fluid Flow. Vol. 3. 213-219. 1982. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX 3D Turbulent flow with separation, RNG k- model with non-equilibrium wall functions pipebnd-rng-noneq.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL030B_vv030.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Turbulent flow through a 90 circular pipe bend is modeled. The flow separates and reattaches around the bend. Due to symmetry of the flow field only half of the domain is modeled. Velocity profile at an angle of 75 (as measured from the inlet) is used to validate the simulation. Figure 30.1: Flow Domain
plane at 75 deg symmetry plane outlet

inlet

Y X

Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 2.3256 x 10-05 kg/m-s

Geometry Radius of the pipe = 0.5 m

Boundary Conditions Inlet velocity: Fully developed turbulent profile for z-velocity. Non components in other directions

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. RNG k- is used to model turbulence along with non-equilibrium wall functions.

103

VMFL030

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 30.2: Comparison of Velocity Magnitude (m/s) at 75 Along the Bend

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 30.3: Comparison of Velocity Magnitude (m/s) at 75 Along the Bend

104

VMFL031: Turbulent Flow Behind an Open-Slit V Gutter

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File J.-T. Yang and G.-L. Tsai. Near-wake flow of a v-gutter with slit bleed . Journal of Fluid Engineering. Vol. 115. 13-20. March, 1993. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent flow spltvee.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL031B_veesplit.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
The near-wake flow structure behind an open-slit V gutter at airflow speed of 20 m/s is modeled. The interaction between the flow penetrating through the open slit and the shear layer results in an asymmetric wake flow structure. The size of the entire recirculation zone shifts toward one of the two wings due to the Coand effect. Figure 31.1: Flow Domain

a H

Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 1.8333 X 10-05 kg/m-s

Geometry L= 40 cm H= 10 cm a= 2 mm

Boundary Conditions uinlet = 20 m/s kinlet = 0.04335 m2/s2 inlet = 0.2119 m2/s3

105

VMFL031 Material Properties Geometry b= 22 mm = 45 Boundary Conditions

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Steady, turbulent, incompressible flow. The standard k- model is used for turbulence.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

The x-velocity at x = 22 mm downstream of the split-V-gutter, is compared with experimental data. Figure 31.2: X-Velocity at x = 22 mm Downstream of the V-Gutter

106

VMFL031 Figure 31.3: The Coand Effect

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 31.4: X-Velocity at x = 22 mm Downstream of the V-Gutter

107

108

VMFL032: Turbulent Flow with Separation Along an Axisymmetric Afterbody

Overview
Reference T.T. Huang and N.C. Groves. Propeller/stern boundary layer interaction on axisymmetric bodies: Theory and experiment . David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center Rep. 76-0113. 1976. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent flow axiaft.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL032B_afterbody.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Flow past an axisymmetric afterbody, representing the hull of ship. The flow separates on the rear face of the body. Figure 32.1: Flow Domain

Inlet

Outlet

Axis Afterbody (wall)

Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m
3

Geometry Length of the afterbody = 1.0 m Maximum radius of the afterbody = 0.04556 m

Boundary Conditions Fully developed turbulent velocity profile on the inlet normal to axis Axial velocity = 5.9 m/s on the inlet parallel to axis

Viscosity: 1 X 106 kg/m-s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The far-field boundary of the domain is set parallel to the axis and is modeled as velocity inlet. Fully developed profile is specified at the transverse velocity inlet.

109

VMFL032

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 32.2: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient Along the Afterbody Wall

Figure 32.3: Comparison of Skin Friction Coefficient Along the Afterbody Wall

110

VMFL032

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 32.4: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient Along the Afterbody Wall

Figure 32.5: Comparison of Skin Friction Coefficient Along the Afterbody Wall

111

112

VMFL033: Viscous Heating in an Annulus

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart, and E. N. Lightfoot. Transport phenomena . John Wiley and Sons. New York. 1960. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Viscous flow and heating driven by a moving wall plate_polar.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL033B_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
In this problem, we model the viscous heating and mass flow in a 2-D annulus induced by the rotation of one of the two walls (Figure 33.1: Geometry (p. 113)). This problem can be solved analytically. Figure 33.1: Geometry

1 2

Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m3 Specific heat: 1 J/kg-K Thermal conductivity: 1 W/m-K Viscosity: 300 kg/m-s

Geometry r1= 1m r2 = 2m

Boundary Conditions 1 = 0.0 rad/s 2 = 0.5 rad/s T1 = 273 K T2 = 274 K

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is laminar and steady. Pressure based solver is used. A 2D mesh with quadrilateral cells is used to discretize the domain.

113

VMFL033

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Normalized velocity and temperature profiles are compared with the analytical solution provided by Bird et al (1960). Figure 33.2: Comparison of Velocity Profile

114

VMFL033 Figure 33.3: Comparison of Temperature Profile

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 33.4: Comparison of Velocity Profile

115

VMFL033 Figure 33.5: Comparison of Temperature Profile

116

VMFL034: Particle Aggregation inside a Turbulent Stirred Tank

Overview
Reference B. Wan, T.A. Ring, K. Dhanasekharan, and J. Sanyal. Comparison of Analytical Solutions for CMSMPR Crystallizer with QMOM Population Balance Modeling in ANSYS FLUENT . China Particuology. Vol. 3(4). 213-218. 2005. ANSYS FLUENT (ANSYS CFX simulation is not available for this case) Multi-phase, Population balance model, turbulent flow agglomeration.cas

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
A 2-D approximation of a stirred tank is simulated in order to verify the population balance model that operates in conjunction with its multiphase calculations to predict the particle size distribution within the flow field. The flow rate at the inlet is equal to that at the outlet, allowing the mean residence time to be calculated from the inlet flow rate (velocity x inlet area) and the volume (box area x unit depth) of the box. To simulate the agitation in the tank the top and bottom walls are assumed to move in the direction of the outlet. The flow is turbulent, steady, and incompressible. Multi-phase, with QMOM population balance model is used for particle aggregation. The standard k- model is used for turbulence. Figure 34.1: Flow Domain

Material Properties Density: 998.2 kg/m

Geometry Square box side = 0.1 m Inlet/Outlet openings = 0.02 m

Boundary Conditions Top wall velocity: 101 m/s Bottom wall velocity: 100 m/s Inlet velocity = 0.005 m/s

Viscosity: 0.00103 kg/m-s

117

VMFL034 Material Properties Geometry Boundary Conditions Outlet gauge pressure = 0 Pa

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The results of the ANSYS FLUENT simulation are compared to steady state analytical solution for the population balance in a stirred tank where aggregation takes place.

Results Comparison
In this table, moment of PBE for ANSYS FLUENT turbulent simulations is compared with analytical solution for aggregation alone at the outlet of the tank. Table 34.1: Comparison of Moment of PBE Moment m0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 Target 0.132 0.225 0.547 1.910 9.073 53.797 ANSYS FLUENT 0.132 0.226 0.548 1.910 9.133 53.816 Ratio 1.000 1.004 1.002 1.000 1.007 1.000

118

VMFL035: 3-Dimensional Single-Stage Axial Compressor

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File Density-based solver (ANSYS FLUENT) ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Compressible (transonic), turbulent flow, moving reference frame axial-compressor.cas

Test Case
A 3-D model of a single-stage axial compressor is simulated. The flow through the rotor blades is computed in a rotating reference frame, while the flow in the stator blades in a stationary frame. The purpose of this case is to validate the performance of the pressure-based coupled solver for a compressible turbomachinery problem with a mixing plane. The flow is compressible, turbulent and steady. Figure 35.1: Flow Domain

Material Properties (for Air) Density = Ideal Gas Molecular weight = 28.966 Specific heat = 1006.43 J/kg-K Viscosity - Sutherlands law

Geometry Geometry is as shown in in Figure 34.1: Flow Domain (p. 117) Number of rotor blades = 16 Number of stator blades = 40

Boundary Conditions Rotational speed = 37,500 rpm For Inlet: Ptotal = 1 atm Ttotal = 288 K

119

VMFL035 Material Properties (for Air) Conductivity - Kinetic theory Geometry Boundary Conditions

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Steady, turbulent, compressible flow. Ideal-gas law is used for density calculations and kinetic theory for fluid viscosity and thermal conductivity. The standard k- model is used for turbulence. Pressurebased coupled solver with a mixing plane at the rotor-outlet/stator-inlet interface.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

The results of the pressure-based ANSYS FLUENT simulation are compared to the steady state solution from the density-based solver. Table 35.1: Comparison of Pressure and Mass Flow Rate Target Pressure at Stator-Outlet (atm) Mass-Flow Rate at Stator-Outlet (kg/s) 1.4725 0.1049 ANSYS FLUENT 1.4822 0.1076 Ratio 1.007 1.026

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 35.2: Comparison of Pressure and Mass Flow Rate Target Pressure at Stator-Outlet (atm) Mass-Flow Rate at Stator-Outlet (kg/s) 1.4725 0.1049 ANSYS CFX 1.4754 0.1078 Ratio 1.0020 1.0276

120

VMFL036: Turbulent Round Jet

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Target File D. C. Wilcox. "Turbulence Modeling for CFD". DCW Industries, Inc.. 1993. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent flow axjet.cas

Test Case
A turbulent round jet is defined by a velocity inlet adjacent to a symmetry boundary, and exhausts into a rectangular domain or plenum. The domain is chosen large enough and the boundary does not interfere with the jet. The flow is turbulent and steady. The purpose of this case is to validate the performance of the Reynolds Stress Model for turbulence. Figure 36.1: Round Jet Geometry

um /2

U0 Shear Layer

Computational Domain

Core
D y x

Material Properties Density = 1 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1e-05 kg/m-s

Geometry D= 1m L= 50 m H= 20 m

Boundary Conditions Inlet: U0 = 1 m/s k= 0.00375 m2/s2 e= 0.00054 m2/s3 Outlet:

121

VMFL036 Material Properties Geometry Boundary Conditions pout = 1 atm

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Steady, turbulent, incompressible flow. The Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) is used for turbulence.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

The jets spreading rate is compared to the Wilcox (1998) data for round jets. The scattering of the data is due to the coarse triangular grid that has been used in this study. A finer grid would have produced a much smoother computational curve. Figure 36.2: Comparison of Results for ANSYS FLUENT

122

VMFL036

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 36.3: Comparison of Results for ANSYS CFX

123

124

VMFL037: Turbulent Flow over a Forward Facing Step

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File S. Baker. Regions of Recirculating Flow Associated with Two-Dimensional Steps . Ph.D. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Surrey. UK. 1977. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX SST model, turbulent flow with separation and reattachment VMFL037_ffstep.cas for ANSYS FLUENT ffstep.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Turbulent flow over a forward facing step is modeled. The flow undergoes separation and reattachment. Figure 37.1: Flow Domain
Free Slip Wall

Pref INLET 5.9H

7.3H y 0

U ref 10H

No Slip Wall

H 14H 19H

Material Properties Density = 1.02 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1.5 X 10-5 kg/m-s

Geometry Step height H = 0.0758 m

Boundary Conditions Inlet Velocity = 9.7 m/s Outer boundary (in transverse direction) is modeled as slip wall

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Pressure coefficient, Cp on the wall is calculated with reference to the pressure at point upstream of the step at coordinates as indicated in Figure 37.1: Flow Domain (p. 125).

125

VMFL037

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 37.2: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient Along the Wall

126

VMFL037

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 37.3: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient Along the Wall

127

128

VMFL038: Falling Film over an Inclined Plane

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File RB Bird. Transport Phenomena . WE Stewart and EN Lightfoot. Pg. 45. 2005 ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Laminar Flow, Coupled solver VMFL038_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL038_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Laminar flow of a fluid over an inclined plane, driven by the pressure difference due to gravity head is modeled. The flow channel is inclined at an angle = 30 with the horizontal direction. Figure 38.1: Flow Domain

X
Sym m
Wa ll

etr

Material Properties Density = 800 kg/m

Geometry Dimensions of the domain: 1 m X 18 m Angle with X-axis = 30

Boundary Conditions Gauge Pressure at Inlet = 0 N/m2 Gauge Pressure at Outlet = -706.32 N/m2

Viscosity = 1 kg/m-s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The density based solver is used in ANSYS FLUENT. Pressure boundaries are specified to model the driving head in the direction of flow.

129

VMFL038

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 38.2: Comparison of Velocity Profile at Outlet

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 38.3: Comparison of Velocity Profile at Outlet

130

VMFL039: Boiling in a Pipe with Heated Wall

Overview
Reference G.G. Bartolomej, V.G. Brantov, Y.S. Molochnikov, Y.V. Kharitonov, V.A. Solodkii, G.N. Batashova, V.N. Mikhailov. An experimental investigation of the true volumetric vapour content with subcooled boiling tubes . Thermal Engineering. Vol. 29, No. 3. 20-22. 1982. ANSYS CFX, ANSYS FLUENT Multiphase flow, phase change, RPI Wall boiling Model wall-boiling.def

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Bubble formation and boiling near the heated wall of a vertical pipe are modeled. Outer wall of the pipe is heated with a constant heat flux. Figure 39.1: Flow Domain

Mass Flow

Material Properties Steam-Water 2-phase Flow: Water: continuous phase

Geometry Radius of the pipe = 7.7 mm Height of the pipe =2m

Boundary Conditions Mass flux at inlet = 900 kg/m2/s Inlet pressure = 4.5 X 106 N/m2

131

VMFL039 Material Properties Water Steam: dispersed bubbles Bubble diameter dependent on fluid temperature Geometry Boundary Conditions Heat transfer at the wall = 570000 W/m2

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. SST model is used for turbulence. RPI model for wall boiling is used with a value of 0.8 for the wall area fraction affected by vapor.

Results Comparison
Figure 39.2: ANSYS FLUENT Comparison of Temperature Along the Pipe Wall

132

VMFL039 Figure 39.3: ANSYS CFX Comparison of Temperature Along the Pipe Wall

133

134

VMFL040: Separated Turbulent Flow in Diffuser

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input Files D.M. Driver. Reynolds shear stress measurements in a separated boundary layer flow . AIAA-91-1787. 1991. ANSYS CFX, ANSYS FLUENT SST model, Adverse pressure gradient, flow separation diffuser-sep.def for ANSYS CFX VMFL040A_diffuser-sep.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Test Case
The test case geometry is shown in Figure 40.1: Sketch of Flow Domain (p. 135). It consists of an axisymmetric diffuser with an internally mounted cylinder along the centre line. The curvature of the diffuser wall results in an adverse pressure gradient. A relatively short separation region was detected in the experiment. Figure 40.1: Sketch of Flow Domain

Diffuser Streamline

y x

0 mm Separation 250 mm 140 mm cylinder

This figure is not to scale. Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 1.5 X 10-5 kg/m-s Geometry Diameter of the cylinder = 140 mm Length of the domain = 1100 mm Boundary Conditions Velocity profile at inlet with average velocity = 29 m/s Outer wall modeled as a slip (inviscid) wall

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. SST model is used for turbulence.

135

VMFL040

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 40.2: Comparison of Skin Friction Coefficient on the Cylinder Wall

136

VMFL040

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 40.3: Comparison of Skin Friction Coefficient on the Cylinder Wall

137

138

VMFL041: Transonic Flow Over an Airfoil

Overview
Reference P.H. Cook, M.A. McDonald, and M.C.P. Firmin. AEROFOIL RAE 2822 - PRESSURE DISTRIBUTIONS, AND BOUNDARY LAYER AND WAKE MEASUREMENTS. AGARD Advisory Report No. 138. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Transonic flow, shock, SST model VMFL041_transonic.cas for ANSYS FLUENT air_foil.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Transoinc flow over air foil RAE 2822 is modeled for an angle of attack of 3.19. The flow domain spans over 100 Chord lengths in both stream-wise and transverse directions. Figure 41.1: Flow Domain

Material Properties Density: Ideal gas law for Air Viscosity: 1.831 X 10-5 kg/m-s

Geometry Chord length of the airfoil =1m

Boundary Conditions Velocity profile at inlet with an average velocity of 218 m/s

139

VMFL041

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. The inlet flow Mach number is close to transonic range. Walls are assumed to be adiabatic.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 41.2: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient on the Airfoil

140

VMFL041

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 41.3: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient on the Airfoil

141

142

VMFL042: Turbulent Mixing of Two Streams with Different Density

Overview
Reference R.E. Uittenbogaard. Stably Stratified Mixing Layer . Data Report for the 14th meeting of the IAHR Working Group on Refined Flow Modeling. 1989. R.E. Uittenbogaard. The Importance of Internal Waves for Mixing in a Stratified Estaurine Tidal Flow . 1995. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX SST model, mixing layer, density difference, buoyancy VMFL042_mixing.cas for ANSYS FLUENT saline-mixing_layer.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Mixing of two turbulent streams of fresh water and saline water is modeled. The two streams are parallel at the inlet and mixing proceeds downstream. Figure 42.1: Flow Domain

Fresh water y x Saline 0.323 m 40 m 0.56 m

Material Properties Density of fresh water: 1015 kg/m3 Density of saline water: 1030 kg/m3 Mixture kinematic diffusivity: 1 X 10-9 m2/s

Geometry Length of the mixing duct = 40 m

Boundary Conditions Fresh water inlet velocity = 0.52 m/s Salt water inlet velocity = 0.32 m/s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. SST model is used. Buoyancy turbulence production option is used.

143

VMFL042

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 42.2: Comparison of Mass Fraction of Salt Water Across the Mixing Layer at x = 10m

144

VMFL042

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 42.3: Comparison of Mass Fraction of Salt Water Across the Mixing Layer at x = 10m

145

146

VMFL043: Laminar to Turbulent Transition of Boundary Layer over a Flat Plate

Overview
Reference A. M. Savill. Some recent progress in the turbulence modeling of bypass transition . Near-Wall Turbulent Flows (eds. R. M. C. So, C. G. Speziale & B. E. Launder). Elsevier Science Publishers. 829-848. 1993. P.E. Roach, and D.H. Brierley. The influence of a turbulent free stream on zero pressure gradient transitional boundary layer development. Part I: Test Cases T3A and T3B . Numerical Simulation of Unsteady and Transition to Turbulence (eds. Pironneau, Rodi, Ryhming, Savill, and Truong). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 319-347. 1992. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX SST model, transitional flow VMFL043_transition.cas for ANSYS FLUENT bl-transition.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Laminar to turbulent transition of a boundary layer over a flat plate is modeled. The free stream turbulence intensity is 3.3%. Figure 43.1: Flow Domain

Leading edge

Material Properties Density: 1.2 kg/m3 Viscosity: 1.831 X 10-5 kg/m-s

Geometry Length of the flat plate = 2m

Boundary Conditions Inlet Velocity = 5.3 m/s Inlet eddy viscosity ratio = 9.7

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. SST model with Gamma Theta model for transitional turbulence is used. Langry Menter correlation was used for transition onset.

147

VMFL043

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 43.2: Comparison of Skin Friction Coefficient on the Plate

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 43.3: Comparison of Skin Friction Coefficient on the Plate

148

VMFL044: Supersonic Nozzle Flow

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File L.H. Back, P.F. Massier, and H.L. Gier. Convective Heat Transfer in a Convergent-Divergent Nozzle . Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. Vol. 7. 549-568. 1964. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Compressible flow in supersonic regime, SST Model VMFL044_nozzleflow.cas for ANSYS FLUENT supersonic-nozzle.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Supersonic flow in a convergent-divergent nozzle is modeled. The flow is supersonic in the entire divergent section of the nozzle. Figure 44.1: Flow Domain
Outlet Cooled wall Constant wall temperature (~0.5 x Tt )

Nozzle

Cooled-approach section

Material Properties Density: Ideal Gas Viscosity: 1.831 X 10 kg/m-s

-5

Geometry Length of the nozzle = 0.1594 m Exit-to-throat area ratio = 2.68 Half angle of divergence = 15

Boundary Conditions Inlet Relative Pressure = 1 X 106 Pa Inlet Total Temperature = 825 K Wall temperature = 413 K

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. The walls are assumed to be at constant temperature. Only a 3 sector of the domain is modeled due to symmetry.

149

VMFL044

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 44.2: Comparison of Pressure Ratio Along the Nozzle Wall with Experimental Data

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 44.3: Comparison of Pressure Ratio Along the Nozzle Wall with Experimental Data

150

VMFL045: Oblique Shock over an Inclined Ramp

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File F. M. White. Fluid Mechanics . 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co.. New York, NY. 560-567. 1994. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Compressible flow in supersonic regime, Oblique shock VMFL045_obliqueshock.cas for ANSYS FLUENT ramp_supersonic_tet.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Supersonic flow over a 15 ramp is modeled. The ramp leads to the formation of an oblique shock. Inlet Mach number is about 2.5. The flow is laminar. The ANSYS CFX values are taken at a Point 1 (x=0.38 m, y=0.14 m) Figure 45.1: Flow Domain

Outlet

Supersonic Inlet

Ramp

Material Properties Density: Ideal Gas Viscosity: 1 X 10-8 kg/m-s

Geometry Angle of the ramp = 15 Width of the domain (in transverse direction) = 0.3048 m

Boundary Conditions Inlet velocity = 852.68 m/s Inlet Temperature = 289 K Wall: Adiabatic

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady and laminar. The walls are assumed to be adiabatic.

151

VMFL045

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 45.1: Comparison of Properties Downstream of the Oblique Shock Target Mach Number Temperature Density 1.87 382 K 2.279 kg/m3 ANSYS FLUENT 1.9 377.6 K 2.233 kg/m3 Ratio 1.01 0.99 0.98

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 45.2: Comparison of Properties Downstream of the Oblique Shock Target Mach Number Temperature Density 1.87 382 K 2.279 kg/m3 ANSYS CFX 1.88 381.6 K 2.30 kg/m3 Ratio 1.00 0.999 1.01

152

VMFL046: Supersonic Flow with Normal Shock in a Converging Diverging Nozzle

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File F. M. White. Fluid Mechanics . 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co.. New York, NY. 518-531. 1994. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Compressible flow in supersonic regime, Normal shock VMFL046_supersonic.cas for ANSYS FLUENT Supersonic2x.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Supersonic flow in a CD nozzle is modeled. The maximum Mach number is 2.2. A normal shock is formed in the divergent section. Mach number distribution in the nozzle is compared with analytical solution for nozzle flow. Figure 46.1: Flow domain

Material Properties Density: Ideal Gas Viscosity: 1.831 X 10-5 kg/m-s

Geometry Length of the nozzle = 2m Exit-to-throat area ratio = 3

Boundary Conditions Inlet Relative Pressure 200 kPa Inlet Total Temperature = 500 K Wall temperature = 328 K Outlet Relative Pressure (gauge) = 75 kPa

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. The walls are assumed to be adiabatic. The flow is modeled as laminar.

153

VMFL046

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 46.2: Comparison of Mach Number Along Center Line of the Nozzle With Analytical Solution

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 46.3: Comparison of Mach Number Along Center Line of the Nozzle With Analytical Solution

154

VMFL047: Turbulent Flow with Separation in an Asymmetric Diffuser

Overview
Reference C. U. Buice and J. K. Eaton. Experimental Investigation of Flow Through an Asymmetric Plane Diffuser . J. Fluids Engineering. Volume 122 (June 2000): 433435. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent separation, standard k- model in ANSYS FLUENT, and SST model in ANSYS CFX. VMFL047_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL047_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Turbulent flow with gradual separation and reattachment is modeled in an asymmetric 2-D diffuser. The lower wall of the diffuser is divergent with an angle of 10 and expands to about 4.7 times the inlet height. Figure 47.1: Flow Domain

Flow Direction Inlet Outlet

Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 0.0001 kg/m-s

Geometry Inlet height H = 2 M Outlet height = 4.7 H Angle of the divergent section = 10 Length of the straight section after divergence = 21 H

Boundary Conditions Fully developed turbulent profile for velocity at inlet with an average velocity = 0.7041 m/s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Steady turbulent flow.

155

VMFL047

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 47.2: Comparison of X-Velocity at X = 24.4 m

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 47.3: Comparison of X-Velocity at X = 24.4 m

156

VMFL048: Turbulent flow in a 180 Pipe Bend

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File T. Takamasa and A. Tomiyama. Three-dimensional gas-liquid two-phase bubbly flow in a C-shaped tube . NURETH-9. San Francisco, USA. 1-17. 1999. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX SST model, turbulent flow with separation and reattachment VMFL048_pipebend.cas for ANSYS FLUENT 180deg_pipe_bend.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Flow in a 3-D pipe bend as shown in Figure 48.1: Flow Domain (p. 157). Figure 48.1: Flow Domain

Material Properties Density: 997 kg/m

Geometry Radius of the pipe = 14 mm Radius of the pipe bend = 125 mm

Boundary Conditions Velocity profile at inlet with an average velocity of 1.42 m/s

Viscosity: 8.899 X 10-4 kg/m-s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Symmetry condition is applied on one side of the pipe.

157

VMFL048

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 48.2: Comparison of Velocity in the Axial Direction at a Section 1.555 m upstream of the Outlet (after the bend)

158

VMFL048

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 48.3: Comparison of Velocity in the Axial Direction at a Section 1.555 m upstream of the Outlet (after the bend)

159

160

VMFL049: Combustion in an Axisymmetric Natural Gas Furnace

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Target File Westbrook and Dryer (1981), Coffee (1985). ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent non-premixed combustion, Eddy dissipation model, k- model VMFL049_combustion.cas for ANSYS FLUENT ENEL_Furnace.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Non-premixed combustion in a natural gas fired furnace is modeled. The axisymmetric flow field is modeled by a 3 cylindrical domain. Fuel jet consists of natural gas modeled as 93% Methane and 7% Nitrogen by mass. Figure 49.1: Flow Domain

Air Natural Gas Air

Material Properties Properties for the mixture of reactants used

Geometry Inner diameter of air annulus = 60 mm Outer diameter of air annulus = 100 mm Diameter of combustion chamber = 500 mm Length of chamber = 1700 mm

Boundary Conditions Air velocity at inlet = 34 m/s Fuel velocity at inlet = 4 m/s Wall temperature = 120C CH4 Mass fraction at inlet = 0.90

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Reactions modeled using Eddy Dissipation Model. The domain is axisymmetric.

161

VMFL049

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 49.2: Comparison of the Mole Fraction of CH 4 Along the Axis

Figure 49.3: Comparison of Temperature Along the Axis

162

VMFL049

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 49.4: Comparison of the Mole Fraction of CH 4 Along the Axis

163

VMFL049 Figure 49.5: Comparison of Temperature Along the Axis

164

VMFL050: Transient Heat Conduction in a Semi-Infinite Slab

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File F.P. Incropera, D.P. Dewitt, T.L. Bergman, and A.S. Lavine, Introduction to Heat Transfer , 5th Edition, Wiley & Sons, 2007; Page 283. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Transient heat transfer, Conduction VMFL050_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL050_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Unsteady heat conduction in a thick copper plate is modeled. Initially (at t = 0) the plate is at a uniform temperature of 293 K. It is suddenly exposed to a heat transfer at one surface with a constant heat flux of 3 X 105 W/m2. The temperature distribution after 2 minutes is considered for verification. Figure 50.1: Flow Domain

Heat Flux at T>0

Conduction

Material Properties Density = 8995.67 kg/m

Geometry Dimensions of the slab: 750 mm X 300 mm

Boundary Conditions Heat Flux = 3 X 105 W/m2 on one wall. The opposite wall is adiabatic. Lateral boundaries are modeled as planes of symmetry.

Specific Heat = 381 J/kg-K Conductivity = 401 W/m-K

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is transient. The dimensions considered here are adequate for the semi-infinite slab assumption. The domain is initialized with a uniform temperature of 293 K corresponding to the condition at time = 0 sec.

165

VMFL050

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 50.1: Comparison of Temperature after 2 Minutes ANSYS FLUENT Temperature of the wall exposed to heat flux, at t=120 sec Temperature at a point 150 mm from the heat flux wall, at t=120 sec 392.95 K 318.41 K Exact Solution 393 K 318.4 K Ratio 0.9998 1.0000

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 50.2: Comparison of Temperature after 2 Minutes ANSYS CFX Temperature of the wall exposed to heat flux, at t=120 sec Temperature at a point 150 mm from the heat flux wall, at t=120 sec 393 K 318.4 K Exact Solution 393 K 318.4 K Ratio 1.0000 1.0000

166

VMFL051: Isentropic Expansion of Supersonic Flow over a Convex Corner

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File John Anderson. Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective . ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Compressible, inviscid flow VMFL051_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL051_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Centered expansion of inviscid supersonic flow around a corner is modeled. The expansion results in a change in direction of the flow, a drop in static pressure, and increase in Mach number. The approaching flow is supersonic, with a Mach number of 2.5. The expansion process is reversible and adiabatic. Figure 51.1: Flow Domain

Incoming flow, M>1 = 195 Flow after expansion, M>>1

adiabatic wall

Material Properties Density: Ideal Gas law Specific Heat = 1006.43 J/kg-K Molecular weight = 28.966

Geometry Angle round the corner = 195 Inlet:

Boundary Conditions

Pressure = 202636.9 Pa Mach number = 2.5, Static temperature = 300 K (In CFX, the corresponding velocity is specified). Wall is adiabatic.

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady and compressible. Inviscid and incompressible. Analytic expressions for isentropic expansion can be used to calculate the Mach number downstream of the corner.

167

VMFL051

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 51.1: Comparison of Mach Number Downstream of the Corner, after Expansion ANSYS FLUENT Mach number after expansion 3.2316 Analytical Calculation 3.2370 Ratio 0.9980

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 51.2: Comparison of Mach Number Downstream of the Corner, after Expansion ANSYS CFX Mach number after expansion 3.2340 Analytical Calculation 3.2370 Ratio 0.9990

168

VMFL052: Turbulent Natural Convection inside a Tall Cavity

Overview
Reference P.L. Betts and I.H. Bokhari. "Experiments on turbulent natural convection in an enclosed tall cavity". International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 21. 675-683. 2000. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent flow, buoyancy effects, Boussinesq approximation (FLUENT)/Ideal gas (CFX) VMFL052_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL052_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Natural convection in the turbulent flow field of an enclosed cavity with a length-to-width ratio of 28.6 is modeled. The Rayleigh number is in the turbulent range. The two vertical walls are kept at different temperatures, while the horizontal walls are adiabatic. Figure 52.1: Flow Domain (not to scale)

Hot Wall

Cold Wall

g = 9.81m/sec 2

169

VMFL052 Material Properties Density : Boussinesq approximation (FLUENT), Ideal Gas law (CFX) Specific Heat = 1005 J/kg-K Viscosity = 1.81X 10-5 kg/m-sec Molecular weight = 28.966 Geometry Length of the cavity = 2.18 m Width of the cavity = 0.0762 m Boundary Conditions Temperature of Cold wall = 288.25 K Temperature of Hot wall = 307.85 K Top and bottom walls are adiabatic

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady and is induced by natural convective heat transfer.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 52.2: Comparison of Vertical Velocity at Y/h = 0.05

170

VMFL052 Figure 52.3: Comparison of Temperature at Y/h = 0.05

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 52.4: Comparison of Vertical Velocity at Y/h = 0.05

171

VMFL052 Figure 52.5: Comparison of Temperature at Y/h = 0.05

172

VMFL053: Compressible Turbulent Mixing Layer

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File S.G. Goebel and J.C. Dutton. Experimental Study of Compressible Turbulent Mixing Layers . AIAA Journal, 29(4). 538-546. 1991. ANSYS FLUENT Turbulence: RNG k- model, compressible, energy equation VMFL053_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Test Case
Two streams of air are mixed in a rectangular tunnel. The length of the computational domain is chosen such that the local Reynolds number at the exit of the test section, which is based on the velocity difference between the streams and the mixing layer thickness, is greater than 100,000. This is the Reynolds number needed for the complete development of the mixing layer. Figure 38.1: Flow Domain
Inlet U_1 = 616 m/s 72 mm U_2 = 100 m/s Outlet Symmetry Outlet

Symmetry 300 mm

Material Properties Air: Density: Ideal Gas Specific Heat: 1006.43 J/kg-K Thermal Conductivity: 0.0242 W/m-K Viscosity: 1.4399e-05 kg/m-s

Geometry Dimensions of the domain: 300mm X 72 mm

Boundary Conditions Primary Stream (1): Total Pressure = 487 kPa Static Pressure = 36 kPa Total Temperature = 360 K Mach Number = 2.35 Turbulent Kinetic Energy = 74 m2/s2 Turbulent Dissipation Rate = 62,300 m2/s3 Secondary Stream (2): Total Pressure = 37.6 kPa Static Pressure = 36 kPa Total Temperature = 290 K Mach Number = 0.36

173

VMFL053 Material Properties Geometry Boundary Conditions Turbulent Kinetic Energy = 226 m2/s2 Turbulent Dissipation Rate = 332,000 m2/s3

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady, turbulent, and compressible. The RNG k- model is used for turbulence.

Results Comparison
The velocity profiles as the mixing layer evolves are compared with the experimental data. Figure 38.2: X Velocity Profiles at x = 50 mm

174

VMFL054: Laminar flow in a Trapezoidal Cavity

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File J.H. Darr and S.P. Vanka. Separated Flow in a Driven Trapezoidal Cavity . Phys. Fluids A, 3(3):385-392. March 1991. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Viscous flow, driven by a moving walls VMFL054_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL054_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Laminar flow induced by the motion of the top wall of a trapezoidal cavity. The top and bottom walls move but the side walls are stationary. The height of the cavity h is 1 m. The widths of the top and bottom walls are 1 m and 2 m, respectively (Figure 38.1: Flow Domain (p. 175)). Figure 38.1: Flow Domain
1m U wall = 400 m/s

U wall = 400 m/s 2 mm

Material Properties Density = 1 kg/m

Geometry Height of cavity = 1 m Width of the bottom base =2m Width of the top base = 1 m

Boundary Conditions Velocity of the base walls = 400 m/s Other walls are stationary

Viscosity = 1 kg/m-s

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. A pressure based solver is used. A triangular mesh of 4016 cells is used to discretize the domain.

175

VMFL054

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

The u-velocity profile at the vertical centerline of the cavity and the -velocity profile at the horizontal centerline of the cavity are compared to Darr and Vanka results. Velocity is normalized by velocity of the moving wall. Figure 38.2: Normalized v-Velocity at the Horizontal Centerline of the Cavity

Figure 38.3: Normalized u-Velocity at the Vertical Centerline of the Cavity

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

176

VMFL054 Figure 38.4: Normalized v-Velocity at the Horizontal Centerline of the Cavity

Figure 38.5: Normalized u-Velocity at the Vertical Centerline of the Cavity

177

178

VMFL055: Transitional Recirculatory Flow inside a Ventilation Enclosure

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File A. Restivo. Turbulent Flow in Ventilated Rooms. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, U.K. 1979. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Transitional turbulence modeling (k-kl model for ANSYS FLUENT, BSL Gamma Model for ANSYS CFX) VMFL055_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL055_CFX-BSL-Gamma.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Flow inside an enclosure similar to a ventilated room is modeled. The flow field is transitional and dominated by recirculation. Reynolds number is based on the inlet dimension and is around 5000. Figure 55.1: Flow Domain

Inlet

H = 3m Outlet

Material Properties Density : 1.225 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1.7894 X 10-5 kg/m-sec

Geometry Height of the enclosure (H) = 3m Length of the enclosure = 9 m (3 H) Inlet : 0.056 H Outlet : 0.16 H

Boundary Conditions Inlet velocity = 0.45 m/S

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is modeled using transitional turbulence models.

179

VMFL055

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 55.2: Comparison of X-Velocity Velocity at Y = 2.916 m

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 55.3: Comparison of X-Velocity Velocity at Y = 2.916 m

180

VMFL056: Combined Conduction and Radiation in a Square Cavity

Overview
Reference Daniel R. Rousse, Guillaume Gautier, and Jean-Francois Sacadura. Numerical predictions of two-dimensional conduction, convection, and radiation heat transfer. II. Validation . International Journal of Thermal Sciences. Volume 39, Issue 3 (March 2000). 332-353. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Radiation modeling; discrete ordinate model in ANSYS FLUENT VMFL056_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL056_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Coupled conduction and radiation is modeled in a square enclosure. The material properties are set to model a condition corresponding to the Conduction-Radiation parameter N = 1.0. Scattering coefficient of the medium is 0. Steady state heat transfer is modeled. One wall of the square cavity is kept at a higher temperature than the other 3 walls. Figure 56.1: Flow Domain

Cold Walls

Hot Wall

Material Properties Thermal Conductivity = 1 W/m-K Absorption Coefficient = 0.228/m

Geometry Dimensions of the domain: 1mX1m

Boundary Conditions Temperature of the hot wall = 100 K Temperature of the cold walls = 50 K

181

VMFL056

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The material properties are set to model the desired conduction-radiation fraction. Radiative heat flux is only a small fraction of the total heat flux.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 56.2: Comparison of Non-Dimensional Temperature at X = 0.5 m

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 56.3: Comparison of Non-Dimensional Temperature at X = 0.5 m

182

VMFL057: Radiation and Conduction in Composite Solid Layers

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File C.M. Spuckler and R. Siegel. Two-Flux and Diffusion Methods for Radiative Transfer in Composite Layers . J. Heat Transfer, 118. 218-222. 1996. ANSYS FLUENT Radiation modeling with DO model, participating medium with gray-band absorption VMFL057_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Test Case
Heat transfer by conduction and radiation is modeled in a composite solid domain consisting of two layers. Both the layers participate in radiation. The two layers are separated by a semi-transparent wall. The upstream and downstream sides of the domain are subjected to convective as well as radiative heat transfer. Figure 57.1: Flow Domain

Symmetry

Wall

lid

1 So

lid

Wall

Symmetry

Material Properties Solid 1: Density = 2719 kg/m3 Specific Heat = 871 J/kg-k Thermal Conductivity = 5.67 W/m-K Absorption Coefficient: gray-band Refractive Index = 1.5 Solid 2: Density = 2719 kg/m Specific Heat = 871 J/kg-k
3

Geometry Dimensions of the domain: 2 m X 1 m (the two solid zones are of equal length)

Boundary Conditions Left-most wall: Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient = 56.7 W/m2 K free stream temperature = 1000K Semi-transparent Right-most wall: Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient = 56.7 W/m2 K
183

VMFL057 Material Properties Thermal Conductivity = 5.67 W/m-K Absorption Coefficient: gray-band Refractive Index = 3 Geometry Boundary Conditions free stream temperature = 250K Semi-transparent

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Transverse boundaries of the domain are modeled as planes of symmetry.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 57.2: Comparison temperature distribution along Y = 0.5 m

184

VMFL058: Turbulent Flow in an Axisymmetric Diffuser

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File R. S. Azad and S. Z. Kassab. Turbulent Flow in a Conical Diffuser: Overview and implications . Phys. Fluids A 1, 564. 1989. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Turbulent flow with adverse pressure gradient VMFL058_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL058_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Fully developed turbulent flow is modeled in an axisymmetric diffuser. The flow is fully developed at the inlet to the diffuser. Figure 58.1: Flow Domain

Wall Axis

Material Properties Density = 1 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1.64 X 10-5 kg/m-s section = 8

Geometry Included angle for the divergent

Boundary Conditions Fully developed turbulent profile at inlet with an average velocity = 1 m/s

Length of Inlet section (straight) = 6m Inlet radius = 1m Outlet radius = 2m

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Steady turbulent flow.

185

VMFL058

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 58.2: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient along the Divergent Diffuser Wall

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 58.3: Comparison of Pressure Coefficient along the Divergent Diffuser Wall

186

VMFL059: Conduction in a Composite Solid Block

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File F.P. Incropera and D.P. Dewitt. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer . 5th Edition. Page 117. 2006. ANSYS FLUENT Conduction with heat source VMFL059_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Test Case
Heat conduction in a plane wall formed as composite of two materials is modeled. One of the materials has a uniform volumetric heat generation source while the other material has an outer surface exposed to convective cooling. Figure 59.1: Flow Domain

i ter Ma

al 1

i ter Ma

al 2

Heat Source

Material Properties Material 1: Density = 2719 kg/m Specific Heat = 871 J/kg-k Thermal Conductivity = 75W/m-K Material 2:
3

Geometry Dimensions of the domain: 0.07 m X 0.08 m Thickness of slab 1 (material 1) = 0.05 m

Boundary Conditions Left-most wall: Adiabatic Right-most wall: Convective, with Heat Transfer Coefficient = 1000 W/m2 K and free stream temperature = 303 K Other boundaries are adiabatic walls.

187

VMFL059 Material Properties Density = 8978 kg/m3 Specific Heat = 381 J/kg-k Thermal Conductivity = 150 W/m-K Geometry Boundary Conditions

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Contact resistance between the slabs is neglected.

Results Comparison
Table 59.1: Comparison Temperatures on the Side Walls ANSYS FLUENT Temperature of the cooled wall Temperature of the adiabatic wall on extreme left side 378.16 K 413.12 K Analytical 378 K 413 K Ratio 1.0004 1.0003

188

VMFL060: Transitional Supersonic Flow over a Rearward Facing Step

Overview
Reference Howard E Smith. The Flow Field and Heat Transfer downstream of a Rearward Facing Step in Supersonic Flow . ARL 67-0056, Aerospace Research Laboratories. Ohio, USA. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Compressible Flow, Transitional turbulence modeling (Transition SST model for ANSYS FLUENT, SST Gamma-Theta Model for ANSYS CFX) VMFL060_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL060_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Supersonic flow with an inlet Mach number 2.5 past a backward facing step is modeled. Key features of the flow field include sudden expansion, free shear layer, recirculation zone, and oblique shock. Reynolds number of the flow (based on step height) is in the transitional range. Figure 60.1: Flow Domain

Traverse boundary Supersonic Flow (M = 2.5)

Step (h = 0.443)

Material Properties Density: Ideal gas Viscosity = 1.7894 X 10 kg/m-sec

-5

Geometry Step Height = 0.443 in Inlet: 4 in upstream of the step Outlet: 12 in downstream of the step Transverse (top) boundary: 6.25 in above the step.

Boundary Conditions Total pressure at inlet = 227527 Pa Static Pressure at Inlet = 13316.6 Total temperature at inlet = 344.44 K Transverse boundary modeled as farfield (ANSYS FLUENT)/ Supersonic outlet (ANSYS CFX) Walls are modeled as adiabatic

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is modeled using transitional turbulence models.

189

VMFL060

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 60.2: Comparison of Non-Dimensionalized Static Pressure along the Stepped Wall Downstream of the Corner

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 60.3: Comparison of Non-Dimensionalized Static Pressure along the Stepped Wall Downstream of the Corner

190

VMFL061: Surface to Surface Radiative Heat Transfer between Two Concentric Cylinders

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File F.P. Incropera and D.P. Dewitt. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer . 4th Edition. New York City, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1996. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Radiation Modeling (S2S Model in ANSYS FLUENT, Monte Carlo Method in ANSYS CFX) VMFL061_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL061_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Test Case
Radiative heat transfer between two cylindrical surfaces forming a concentric annulus is modeled. There is no participating medium. Due to symmetry only the shaded portion of the domain in Figure 61.1: Flow Domain (p. 191) is modeled. Figure 61.1: Flow Domain

Cold outer wall

Hot inner wall

Material Properties Material does not participate in the energy transfer.

Geometry Radius of inner wall = 0.04625 m

Boundary Conditions Temperature of inner wall = 700 K

191

VMFL061 Material Properties Geometry Radius of outer wall = 0.0178 m Boundary Conditions Temperature of outer wall = 300 K

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Because there is no flow of mass, only the energy equation is solved. Radiation models are used for the simulation. Heat transfer is purely due to radiation between the two surfaces.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 61.2: Comparison of Temperature Variation along Radius

192

VMFL061

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 61.3: Comparison of Temperature Variation along Radius

193

194

VMFL062: Fully Developed Turbulent Flow Over a Hill

Overview
Reference V. Baskaran, A. J. Smits, and P. N. Joubert. " A turbulent flow over a curved hill Part 1. Growth of an internal boundary layer". Journal of Fluid Mechanics, (1987), 182: 4783. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Low Re k-e Model in ANSYS FLUENT, k-e Model in ANSYS CFX VMFL062_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL062_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Flow over a hill geometry with separation and reattachment is modeled. Fully developed turbulent profile is specified at the inlet. Figure 62.1: Flow Domain

Flow Direction

Hill

Material Properties Density : 1 kg/m3 Viscosity = 7.5188e-07 kg/m-s

Geometry Height of the hill = 20.5 mm

Boundary Conditions Fully developed profiles are specified at the inlet for (i) Velocity, (ii) Turbulent kinetic Energy, and (iii) Eddy dissipation rate. Average velocity at inlet = 1 m/s

195

VMFL062

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 62.2: Comparison of Skin Friction along the Wall

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Figure 62.3: Comparison of Skin Friction along the Wall

196

VMFL063: Separated Laminar Flow over a Blunt Plate

Overview
Reference J.C . Lane and R.I. Loehrke. Leading Edge Separation from a Blunt Plate at Low Reynolds Number . Transactions of ASME, Volume 102 (December 1980): 494496. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS CFX Laminar flow, high resolution numerical models VMFL063_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT VMFL063_CFX.def for ANSYS CFX

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
The flow separation over a blunt leading edge in laminar flow is modeled. The flow separates and reattaches along the plate. The reattachment length predicted by the solvers is validated against experimental results. Due to symmetry, only half of the domain shown in Figure 63.1: Flow Domain (p. 197) is modeled. The Reynolds number based on plate thickness is 227. Figure 63.1: Flow Domain

Flow Direction

Reattachment Plane of Symmetry Blunt plate

Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 1.7894 X 10-5 kg/m-s

Geometry Thickness of the plate, 2t = 90 mm Length of the plate = 1500 mm

Boundary Conditions Velocity at inlet = 0.045133 m/s

197

VMFL063

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 63.1: Comparison of Reattachment Length ANSYS FLUENT Non-dimensionalized Reattachment length (LR/2t) 3.8 Experiment 4.0 Ratio 0.95

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 63.2: Comparison of Reattachment Length ANSYS CFX Non-dimensionalized Reattachment length (LR/2t) 4.37 Experiment 4.0 Ratio 1.093

198

VMFL064: Low Reynolds Number Flow in a Channel with Sudden Asymmetric Expansion

Overview
Reference 1. B. Armaly, F. Durst, J. Pereira, and B. Schnung. Experimental and theoretical investigation of a backward-facing step . J. Fluid Mech. 127 (1983): 473. 2. C.J. Freitas. Perspective: Selected Benchmarks from Commercial CFD Codes . J. Fluids Eng. Volume 117, Issue 2 (June 1995): 208. Solver Physics/Models Input File ANSYS FLUENT Laminar flow, Separation, and Reattachment VMFL064_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Test Case
Laminar flow in a channel with a backward facing step expansion is modeled. The channels section upstream of the expansion is long enough to ensure fully developed laminar profile. The reattachment length predicted by the solvers is validated against experimental results. Reynolds number based on D (equal to twice the channel height at inlet) is 200. The domain extends to about 40 times the stepheight upstream and over 20 times the step-height downstream. Figure 64.1: Flow Domain

Flow Direction

Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 1.5 X 10-5 kg/m-s

Geometry Step height, s = 4.9 mm Channel height at inlet = 5.2 mm Length of inlet section = 200 mm Length downstream of the step = 100 mm

Boundary Conditions Velocity at inlet = 0.288462 m/s No-slip condition at the walls

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is fully developed before the step. Reattachment length is measured from the reversal of the sign of the wall shear along the flow direction.

199

VMFL064

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Table 64.1: Comparison of Reattachment Length ANSYS FLUENT Non-dimensionalized Reattachment length (LR/Step-height) 4.93 Experiment 5.0 Ratio 0.986

Results Comparison for ANSYS CFX

Table 64.2: Comparison of Reattachment Length ANSYS CFX Non-dimensionalized Reattachment length (LR/Step-height) 4.90 Experiment 5.0 Ratio 0.98

200

VMFL065: Swirling Turbulent Flow Inside a Diffuser

Overview
Reference P.D. Clausen, S.G. Koh, and D.H. Wood. Measurements of a Swirling Turbulent Boundary Layer Developing in a Conical Diffuser. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. Volume 6, Issue 1 (January 1993): 39-48. ANSYS FLUENT Turbulent flow, swirl velocity, Reynolds stress model for turbulence VMFL065_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Turbulent flow with a strong swirl component is modeled in an axisysmmetric diffuser. The swirl component of the velocity has a dominant effect on the flow field inside the diffuser. Figure 65.1: Flow Domain

Flow

Material Properties Density: 1 kg/m3 Viscosity: 1.293 X 10-6 kg/m-s

Geometry Length of the straight inlet section = 25 mm Length of the diffuser (divergent section) = 510 mm Inlet Diameter = 260 mm Outlet Diameter = 440 mm

Boundary Conditions Fully developed turbulent profile for velocity, k and at inlet (with average axial inlet velocity = 1 m/s) No-slip condition at the walls

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

RS model is used for turbulence due to the strong swirl component.

201

VMFL065

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 65.2: Comparison of Swirl Velocity at X = 0.175 m

202

VMFL066: Radiative Heat Transfer in a Rectangular Enclosure with Participating Medium

Overview
Reference G.D Raithby and E.H. Chui. A Finite Volume Method for Predicting a Radiant Heat Transfer in Enclosoures with Participating Media . Journal of Heat Transfer. Volume 112 (May 1990): 415-423. ANSYS FLUENT Radiation modeling, discrete Ordinate Model in ANSYS FLUENT VMFL066_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
Two dimensional radiative heat transfer in an enclosure with one hot wall and three cold walls at equal temperature is modeled. The enclosure is a rectangular cavity with a length-to-width ratio of 5. For the problem being considered, sLy = 1.0, where s is the scattering coefficient and Ly is the normal distance between the hot wall and the cold wall opposite to it. Figure 66.1: Flow Domain

Cold Walls

Hot Wall

Material Properties Scattering coefficient = 0.5/m

Geometry Dimensions of the domain: 10 mx2m

Boundary Conditions Temperature of the hot wall = 200 K Temperature of he cold walls = 100 K

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Isotropic scattering and radiative equilibrium are assumed.

203

VMFL066

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 66.2: Comparison of Non-Dimensional Heat Flux along the Hot Wall

204

VMFL067: Boiling in a Pipe-Critical Heat Flux

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File Calculation of Dryout and Post-Dryout Heat Transfer for Tube Geometry . Norbert Hoyer Int. J. Multiphase Flow. Vol.24, No.2, pp. 319-334, 1998. ANSYS FLUENT Multiphase, heat and mass transfer, boiling VMFL067_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Test Case
This test case considers boiling near a heated wall of a vertical pipe. The effects of critical heat flux and post-dryout heat transfer are modeled in a vertical circular pipe. The outer wall of the pipe is heated with a constant heat flux. Figure 67.1: Flow Domain

Material Properties Steam-Water 2-phase Flow: Water: continuous phase Water Steam: dispersed bubbles

Geometry Radius of the pipe = 5 mm Height of the pipe = 7m

Boundary Conditions Mass flux at inlet = 1495 kg/m2/s Heat transfer at the wall = 797000 W/m2

205

VMFL067

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. RNG k-epsilon model is used for turbulence.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 67.2: Comparison of Wall Temperature

206

VMFL068: Axial Flow in an Eccentric Annulus

Overview
Reference Simulated Velocity Profiles for Eccentric Annular Flow with Inner Rotation J.L. Vieira Neto 1, A.L. Martins3 , A. Silveira Neto2, C.H. Atade1, M.A.S. Barrozo1* 1. Federal University of Uberlndia, Chemical Engineering School, Uberlndia, MG, Brazil. 2. Federal University of Uberlndia, Mechanical Engineering School, Uberlndia, MG, Brazil. 3. PETROBRAS/CENPES/TEP, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Solver Physics/Models Input File ANSYS FLUENT Steady flow, periodic, turbulence, RSM VMFL068_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Test Case
This test case considers axial flow in an eccentric annulus without rotation of the inner cylinder. Eccentricity of the channel is 0.5. The Reynolds number is 26,600. Figure 68.1: Flow Domain

Material Properties Density = 896 kg/m3 Viscosity = 0.00146048 kg/m-s

Geometry Diameter, outer cylinder = 40.3 mm Diameter, inner cylinder = 20.1 mm

Boundary Conditions Periodic Boundary is used with a Mass Flow Rate =1.8368 kg/s.

207

VMFL068 Material Properties Geometry Eccentricity = 0.5 Boundary Conditions

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. The velocity profile at the inlet is fully developed.

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 68.2: Comparison of Normalized Axial Velocity at Plane 2

Figure 68.3: Comparison of Normalized Axial Velocity at Plane 3

208

VMFL069: Two Phase Poiseulle Flow

Overview
Reference Marchandise, Emilie and Remacle, Jean-Fancois. A Stabilized Finite Element Method using a Discontinuous Level Set Approach for Solving Two Phase Incompressible Flows. ANSYS FLUENT Steady flow, laminar, two phase, vof VMFL069_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Solver Physics/Models Input File

Test Case
This test case considers the horizontal stratified Poiseulle flow of two fluids between parallel walls. The interface between the two phases is located at half of the height of the channel. Figure 69.1: Flow Domain

Material Properties The two fluids have the same density. Kinematic Viscosity Fluid-1 = 0.1 Fluid-2 = 0.02

Geometry Dimensions of the domain: 2 m X 4 m

Boundary Conditions Periodic Boundary is used with a Pressure Gradient =-0.5 Pa/m.

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

The flow is steady. Deformation of the interface is not modeled.

209

VMFL069

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 69.2: Comparison of Velocity Profile for Two Phase Flow

210

VMFL070: Radiation Between Two Parallel Surfaces

Overview
Reference Solver Physics/Models Input File F.P. Incropera and D.P. Dewitt. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. 4th Edition. New York City, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1996. ANSYS FLUENT Heat Transfer, radiation VMFL070_FLUENT.cas for ANSYS FLUENT

Test Case
This test case considers radiation heat transfer between two parallel surfaces. The surfaces are modeled as a rectangle with a length-to-gap aspect ratio of 5 to minimize the edge effect near the mid span. The gap thickness between the upper and lower surfaces is 0.5 m. Figure 70.1: Flow Domain

Material Properties Material does not participate in the energy transfer.

Geometry Dimensions of the domain: 5 m X 0.5 m

Boundary Conditions Top Wall Temperature = 400K Bottom Wall Temperature = 300K

Analysis Assumptions and Modeling Notes

Because there is no flow of mass, only the energy equation is solved. Heat transfer is purely due to radiation between the two surfaces.

211

VMFL070

Results Comparison for ANSYS FLUENT

Figure 70.2: Comparison of Normalized Temperature with Analytical Result

212

ANSYS Fluent Teory Guide 21R1
40% (5)
ANSYS Fluent Teory Guide 21R1
1,072 pages
Technical Analysis from A to Z, 2nd Edition
From Everand
Technical Analysis from A to Z, 2nd Edition
Steven B. Achelis
4.5/5 (19)
Ansys Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
100% (2)
Ansys Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
226 pages
ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide
67% (3)
ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide
868 pages
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Structural Analysis Guide
No ratings yet
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Structural Analysis Guide
522 pages
SHSG11 - Q1 - M1 - Oral-Comunication - in - Context - Nature - Functions - and - Processes - v3 PDF
81% (52)
SHSG11 - Q1 - M1 - Oral-Comunication - in - Context - Nature - Functions - and - Processes - v3 PDF
53 pages
Mechanical Add-Ons Guide
No ratings yet
Mechanical Add-Ons Guide
168 pages
Ansys Fluent Theory Guide
100% (1)
Ansys Fluent Theory Guide
1,080 pages
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual 18.2
No ratings yet
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual 18.2
252 pages
ANSYS System Coupling Tutorials 181
No ratings yet
ANSYS System Coupling Tutorials 181
114 pages
ANSYS CFX Tutorials 19.2
No ratings yet
ANSYS CFX Tutorials 19.2
910 pages
Housekeeping at Work
No ratings yet
Housekeeping at Work
4 pages
Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual PDF
No ratings yet
Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual PDF
194 pages
Work Bench Verification
0% (1)
Work Bench Verification
220 pages
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
50% (2)
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
202 pages
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
No ratings yet
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
194 pages
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
No ratings yet
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
272 pages
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
No ratings yet
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
252 pages
Ansys Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
No ratings yet
Ansys Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
248 pages
Ansys Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
No ratings yet
Ansys Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
256 pages
ANSYS Workbench Verification Manual
No ratings yet
ANSYS Workbench Verification Manual
236 pages
Ansys_Fluid_Dynamics_Verification_Manual-1
No ratings yet
Ansys_Fluid_Dynamics_Verification_Manual-1
274 pages
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
100% (1)
ANSYS Fluid Dynamics Verification Manual
254 pages
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Fluids Analysis Guide
No ratings yet
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Fluids Analysis Guide
44 pages
Ansys 14 - Tutorial
100% (2)
Ansys 14 - Tutorial
82 pages
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Fluids Analysis Guide PDF
100% (1)
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Fluids Analysis Guide PDF
46 pages
Ansys Icem CFD Users Manual 18.2
No ratings yet
Ansys Icem CFD Users Manual 18.2
60 pages
ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Manual
No ratings yet
ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Manual
62 pages
Ilide - Info Aqwa Theory Manual PR
No ratings yet
Ilide - Info Aqwa Theory Manual PR
168 pages
Ansys Forte Best Practices
No ratings yet
Ansys Forte Best Practices
48 pages
System Coupling Tutorials 182
No ratings yet
System Coupling Tutorials 182
114 pages
AqwaWave Manual
No ratings yet
AqwaWave Manual
44 pages
TG User PDF
No ratings yet
TG User PDF
162 pages
Ansys CFX-Solver Theory Guide
No ratings yet
Ansys CFX-Solver Theory Guide
387 pages
Mechanical Add-Ons Guide
No ratings yet
Mechanical Add-Ons Guide
234 pages
ANSYS Polyflow Tutorial Guide
No ratings yet
ANSYS Polyflow Tutorial Guide
416 pages
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Material Reference
No ratings yet
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Material Reference
330 pages
Ansys_Fluent_Theory_Guide
No ratings yet
Ansys_Fluent_Theory_Guide
1,144 pages
Ansys TurboGrid Users Guide
No ratings yet
Ansys TurboGrid Users Guide
224 pages
Ansys Fluent Battery Module Manualpdf
No ratings yet
Ansys Fluent Battery Module Manualpdf
24 pages
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Fluids Analysis Guide v19.0
No ratings yet
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Fluids Analysis Guide v19.0
44 pages
ANSYS Workbench Verification Manual v18.2
No ratings yet
ANSYS Workbench Verification Manual v18.2
382 pages
SystemCouplingTutorials R180
No ratings yet
SystemCouplingTutorials R180
112 pages
Ai Instl
No ratings yet
Ai Instl
278 pages
Ansys TurboGrid Tutorials 2021 R2
No ratings yet
Ansys TurboGrid Tutorials 2021 R2
69 pages
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Thermal Analysis Guide
No ratings yet
ANSYS Mechanical APDL Thermal Analysis Guide
98 pages
Teardowns: Learn How Electronics Work by Taking Them Apart
From Everand
Teardowns: Learn How Electronics Work by Taking Them Apart
Bryan Bergeron
No ratings yet
Antenna Arraying Techniques in the Deep Space Network
From Everand
Antenna Arraying Techniques in the Deep Space Network
David H. Rogstad
No ratings yet
Web Video Business
From Everand
Web Video Business
MUHAMMAD NUR WAHID ANUAR
No ratings yet
Practical Antenna Handbook 5/e
From Everand
Practical Antenna Handbook 5/e
Joseph J. Carr
5/5 (2)
Programming the Intel Galileo: Getting Started with the Arduino -Compatible Development Board
From Everand
Programming the Intel Galileo: Getting Started with the Arduino -Compatible Development Board
Christopher Rush
5/5 (1)
Financing patterns of European Buy-Outs
From Everand
Financing patterns of European Buy-Outs
Sascha Kaumann
No ratings yet
Electronics from the Ground Up: Learn by Hacking, Designing, and Inventing
From Everand
Electronics from the Ground Up: Learn by Hacking, Designing, and Inventing
Ronald Quan
3.5/5 (2)
Large Antennas of the Deep Space Network
From Everand
Large Antennas of the Deep Space Network
William A. Imbriale
No ratings yet
Signal Theory Methods in Multispectral Remote Sensing
From Everand
Signal Theory Methods in Multispectral Remote Sensing
David A Landgrebe
No ratings yet
Internet Technologies Handbook: Optimizing the IP Network
From Everand
Internet Technologies Handbook: Optimizing the IP Network
Mark A. Miller
No ratings yet
Pollution Prevention: Methodology, Technologies and Practices
From Everand
Pollution Prevention: Methodology, Technologies and Practices
Kenneth L. Mulholland
No ratings yet
Facility Management: Business Process Integration
From Everand
Facility Management: Business Process Integration
Alexander Redlein
No ratings yet
International Workshop on Automotive Engineering
From Everand
International Workshop on Automotive Engineering
Antonio Miravete de Marco
No ratings yet
Collapse analysis of externally prestressed structures
From Everand
Collapse analysis of externally prestressed structures
Jens Tandler
No ratings yet
CNC Machining Handbook: Building, Programming, and Implementation
From Everand
CNC Machining Handbook: Building, Programming, and Implementation
Alan Overby
No ratings yet
Gray Hat Hacking the Ethical Hacker's
From Everand
Gray Hat Hacking the Ethical Hacker's
Çağatay Şanlı
5/5 (1)
Harshit's WLP On Dabur India Ltd. Harshit
No ratings yet
Harshit's WLP On Dabur India Ltd. Harshit
46 pages
NIT Trichy Ans
No ratings yet
NIT Trichy Ans
7 pages
Ventilation for Environmental Tobacco Smoke 1st Edition Brian A Rock - The latest ebook version is now available for instant access
100% (1)
Ventilation for Environmental Tobacco Smoke 1st Edition Brian A Rock - The latest ebook version is now available for instant access
48 pages
Clinical Trial Documents
100% (1)
Clinical Trial Documents
44 pages
Topic 4 - by Mr. Alex Czar Masiglat
No ratings yet
Topic 4 - by Mr. Alex Czar Masiglat
46 pages
FOR FINAL DEFENSE Body Shaming and Coping Mechnism of Grade 12 Students of Brokenshire College
No ratings yet
FOR FINAL DEFENSE Body Shaming and Coping Mechnism of Grade 12 Students of Brokenshire College
74 pages
Law of Conservation of Matter Lab: Teacher Notes
No ratings yet
Law of Conservation of Matter Lab: Teacher Notes
5 pages
Rr720507 Neural Networks
No ratings yet
Rr720507 Neural Networks
5 pages
Critical Path Method
No ratings yet
Critical Path Method
5 pages
Title of The Project:: Kids Corner System
No ratings yet
Title of The Project:: Kids Corner System
31 pages
Bandlaguda
No ratings yet
Bandlaguda
24 pages
What My Family Should Know
No ratings yet
What My Family Should Know
12 pages
Risk Mangement: Student Name: Salem Sobhy Student ID:20182734 Dr. Dina Mahmoud Mansour T.A: Eng. Shrouk Awad
No ratings yet
Risk Mangement: Student Name: Salem Sobhy Student ID:20182734 Dr. Dina Mahmoud Mansour T.A: Eng. Shrouk Awad
6 pages
Alexander Wright - Songwriting - How To Write Lyrics For Beginners (2016)
No ratings yet
Alexander Wright - Songwriting - How To Write Lyrics For Beginners (2016)
30 pages
Programming III - Commands and Basic Motor Control
No ratings yet
Programming III - Commands and Basic Motor Control
31 pages
Anti-Imbalance of The Different Antenna (RAN15.0 - 01)
No ratings yet
Anti-Imbalance of The Different Antenna (RAN15.0 - 01)
18 pages
UNIT INJECTOR Catalog Fast Moving Items 2021 PDF 1640945547
No ratings yet
UNIT INJECTOR Catalog Fast Moving Items 2021 PDF 1640945547
11 pages
Log
No ratings yet
Log
30 pages
Abid CV Document Controller
No ratings yet
Abid CV Document Controller
3 pages
VP Finance CFO Controller in Los Angeles CA Resume Mark Russell
No ratings yet
VP Finance CFO Controller in Los Angeles CA Resume Mark Russell
3 pages
9699 PHE 2016 Complete Immunisation Schedule SUMMER16 A4 16
No ratings yet
9699 PHE 2016 Complete Immunisation Schedule SUMMER16 A4 16
2 pages
Download Complete Wastewater treatment and reuse : theory and design examples. Volume 2, Post-treatment, reuse, and disposal 1st Edition Qasim PDF for All Chapters
100% (1)
Download Complete Wastewater treatment and reuse : theory and design examples. Volume 2, Post-treatment, reuse, and disposal 1st Edition Qasim PDF for All Chapters
55 pages
Midterm Fin Oo4
100% (1)
Midterm Fin Oo4
82 pages
Eng P2 Doc1 Question Paper 1
No ratings yet
Eng P2 Doc1 Question Paper 1
10 pages
Electrical and Optical Properties of Materials
No ratings yet
Electrical and Optical Properties of Materials
18 pages
Amit Surati 29
No ratings yet
Amit Surati 29
3 pages
318 Inter Economics TM
No ratings yet
318 Inter Economics TM
389 pages
EALS (1) (1) (1)
No ratings yet
EALS (1) (1) (1)
28 pages