Lecture 11 Forecasting Methods QM
Lecture 11 Forecasting Methods QM
FORECASTING METHODS
Lecture 11
Learning Objectives
Students should be able to:
Define the concept of a forecast and
forecast error
Calculate different measures of forecast
error
Apply, evaluate and compare different
methods of forecasting in QM based on
time series data.
Introduction to Forecasting
Forecasting Benefits
Forecast Accuracy
Selecting a forecasting method depends on the
accuracy of the method compared to other methods.
Forecasters need to choose methods which generate
the least amount of error - this represents the
methods which are most accurate (better
representation of actual data)
Forecast error is simply the difference between actual
data values or demand and forecast values.
Forecast Error = Actual (A) - Forecast (F).
If an actual demand value was 19 and a
corresponding forecast value in the same period
was 23, the forecast error is - 4.
Forecast error can be converted to an absolute
error which is simply the removal of the negative
sign from the value thus creating an absolute
(non-negative number) which is 4.
This is called absolute error or [error].
1/13/2014
Actual
243
315
286
256
241
298
Forecast
250
320
275
260
250
275
|error|
error2
7
5
49
25
11
4
9
23
121
16
81
529
MAD =
(9.83)
MSE =
(136.8)
Forecasting Methods
There are three categories of forecasting
methods:
Time series methods: Highlight patterns in
historical data and then extrapolate this
pattern into the future.
Causal methods: Focus on the relationships
between variables to forecast future values.
Qualitative methods: Focus on subjective
judgements and expert opinions to develop
relevant forecasts.
Nave Method
Forecast (F)
2000
2001
5
9
2002
2003
12
2004
12
2005
10
2006
10
A.
5
9
6
12
7
10
8
F.
5
9
6
12
7
10
[Error]
[Error]2
MAD
MSE
4 SUM
16
SUM
AND
AND
3 AVERAGE 9 AVERAGE
6
36
5
25
3
9
2
4
3.83
16.5
1/13/2014
2000
2001
5
9
2002
2003
12
(5 + 9 + 6)/3 = 6.67
2004
(9 +6 +12)/3 = 9
2005
10
(6 +12+7)/3 = 8.33
2006
(12+7+10)/3 =9.67
A.
5
9
6
12
7
10
8
F.
6.67
9
8.33
9.67
[Error]
5.33
2
1.67
1.67
2.67
[Error]2
28.44
4
2.78
2.78
9.50
A.
5
9
6
12
7
10
8
F.
7
7.5
9
9.5
8.5
[Error]
1
4.5
2
0.5
0.5
1.70
[Error]2
1
20.25
4
.25
.25
5.15
Exponential Smoothing
Another smoothing method which represents a
weighted average method.
It uses a weighted average of past data values as
a forecast.
Each new forecast is based on the previous
forecast plus a percentage of the difference
between the forecast and the actual value in that
previous period (i.e. percentage of forecast error
not absolute error).
Next Forecast = Previous forecast + (Previous
Actual Previous Forecast), where:
(Actual Forecast) = Error in last period, and is
percentage of error (i.e. smoothing constant).
1/13/2014
Exponential Smoothing
Years
2000
2001
Actual (A)
Demand
(No. of
customer
orders)
Forecast (F)
(0.3 = )
Formula: Next forecast =
Previous forecast + (A F)
5
9
2002
6.2 = 5 + .3 (9 - 5)
2003
12
2004
2005
10
2006
Yrs
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
MAD
MSE
A.
5
9
6
12
7
10
8
F.
5
6.2
6.14
7.9
7.63
8.34
[Error]
4
.2
5.86
0.9
2.37
.34
2.28
[Error]2
16
.04
34.34
.81
5.62
.12
9.49
1/13/2014
Actual
y
5
9
6
12
7
10
8
ty
5
18
18
48
35
60
56
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
t2
1
4
9
16
25
36
49
Actual
y
5
9
6
12
7
10
8
57
28
ty
5
18
18
48
35
60
56
240
t2
1
4
9
16
25
36
49
140
ty
t2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
28
57
282
7 x 140
57
28
.43*
1596
0.43
6.42
784
57
28
.43*
.43
1/13/2014
Actual
y
5
9
6
12
7
10
8
T
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Forecast
Y = a + bt
6.85 = 6.42 + .43(1)
7.28 = 6.42 +.43 (2)
7.71 = 6.42 + .43 (3)
8.14 = 6.42 + .43 (4)
8.57 = 6.42 + .43 (5)
9.00 = 6.42 + .43 (6)
9.43 = 6.42 + .43 (7)
A.
5
F.
6.85
[Error]
1.85
[Error]2
3.42
2001
2002
2003
9
6
12
7.28
7.71
8.14
1.72
1.71
3.86
2.96
2.92
14.90
2004
2005
2006
MAD
MSE
7
10
8
8.57
9.00
9.43
1.57
1
1.43
1.87
2.46
1
2.04
3.52
MAD
MSE
3.83
1.70
16.5
5.15
3 yr MA
Exp. Smoothing (0.3)
Linear Trend
Projection
2.67
2.28
9.50
9.49
1.87
3.52
Lowest
MAD
Lowest
MSE
Final Decision
The measure of forecast accuracy chosen
influences the forecast method selection.
One would use the 2 year MA as the
forecasting method of choice if MAD is the
preferred criterion, or one may use linear trend
method if the MSE is the preferred criterion.
Lets say we used the MAD as the criterion, you
can use the 2 year forecast method to predict for
the next year (in this case, year 2007). To
calculate this forecast for 2007, average the data
values for 2005 and 2006.
If we relied on the MSE as the criterion, you will
use the linear trend equation to predict 2007: =
6.42 + .43(8).
Actual
y
5
9
6
12
7
10
8
?
T
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Forecast
Y = a + bt
6.85 = 6.42 + .43(1)
7.28 = 6.42 +.43 (2)
7.71 = 6.42 + .43 (3)
8.14 = 6.42 + .43 (4)
8.57 = 6.42 + .43 (5)
9.00 = 6.42 + .43 (6)
9.43 = 6.42 + .43 (7)
9.86 = 6.42 + .43 (8)
1/13/2014
Qualitative Forecasting
Delphi Method
interactive group process consisting of obtaining
information from a group of respondents through
questionnaires and surveys
Jury of Executive Opinion
obtains opinions of a small group of high-level
managers in combination with statistical models
Sales Force Composite
allows each sales person to estimate the sales for
his/her region and then compiles the data at a
district or national level
Consumer Market Survey
solicits input from customers or potential
customers regarding their future purchasing plans