Sample Linked Lists Chapter (Data Structure and Algorithmic Thinking With Python)

Data Structure and Algorithmic Thinking with Python Linked Lists
Chapter
Linked Lists 3
3.1 What is a Linked List?
A linked list is a data structure used for storing collections of data. A linked list has the following properties.
Successive elements are connected by pointers
The last element points to NULL
Can grow or shrink in size during execution of a program
Can be made just as long as required (until systems memory exhausts)
Does not waste memory space (but takes some extra memory for pointers)
4 15 7 40 NULL
Head
3.2 Linked Lists ADT

The following operations make linked lists an ADT:
Main Linked Lists Operations
Insert: inserts an element into the list
Delete: removes and returns the specified position element from the list
Auxiliary Linked Lists Operations
Delete List: removes all elements of the list (dispose of the list)
Count: returns the number of elements in the list
Find node from the end of the list
3.3 Why Linked Lists?

There are many other data structures that do the same thing as linked lists. Before discussing linked lists it is
important to understand the difference between linked lists and arrays. Both linked lists and arrays are used to
store collections of data, and since both are used for the same purpose, we need to differentiate their usage.
That means in which cases are suitable and in which cases are suitable.
3.4 Arrays Overview

One memory block is allocated for the entire array to hold the elements of the array. The array elements can be
accessed in constant time by using the index of the particular element as the subscript.
3.1 What is a Linked List? 48

3 2 1 2 2 3
Index 0 1 2 3 4 5
Why Constant Time for Accessing Array Elements?

To access an array element, the address of an element is computed as an offset from the base address of the
array and one multiplication is needed to compute what is supposed to be added to the base address to get the
memory address of the element. First the size of an element of that data type is calculated and then it is
multiplied with the index of the element to get the value to be added to the base address.
This process takes one multiplication and one addition. Since these two operations take constant time, we can
say the array access can be performed in constant time.
Advantages of Arrays
Simple and easy to use
Faster access to the elements (constant access)
Disadvantages of Arrays
Fixed size: The size of the array is static (specify the array size before using it).
One block allocation: To allocate the array itself at the beginning, sometimes it may not be possible to
get the memory for the complete array (if the array size is big).
Complex position-based insertion: To insert an element at a given position, we may need to shift the
existing elements. This will create a position for us to insert the new element at the desired position. If
the position at which we want to add an element is at the beginning, then the shifting operation is more
expensive.
Dynamic Arrays
Dynamic array (also called , , , or ) is a random access,
variable-size list data structure that allows elements to be added or removed.
One simple way of implementing dynamic arrays is to initially start with some fixed size array. As soon as that
array becomes full, create the new array double the size of the original array. Similarly, reduce the array size to
half if the elements in the array are less than half.
Note: We will see the implementation for in the , and chapters.
Advantages of Linked Lists

Linked lists have both advantages and disadvantages. The advantage of linked lists is that they can be
in constant time. To create an array, we must allocate memory for a certain number of elements. To add more
elements to the array, we must create a new array and copy the old array into the new array. This can take a lot
of time.
We can prevent this by allocating lots of space initially but then we might allocate more than we need and waste
memory. With a linked list, we can start with space for just one allocated element and on new elements
easily without the need to do any copying and reallocating.
Issues with Linked Lists (Disadvantages)

There are a number of issues with linked lists. The main disadvantage of linked lists is to individual
elements. Array is random-access, which means it takes O(1) to access any element in the array. Linked lists
take O() for access to an element in the list in the worst case. Another advantage of arrays in access time is
in memory. Arrays are defined as contiguous blocks of memory, and so any array element will be
physically near its neighbors. This greatly benefits from modern CPU caching methods.
Although the dynamic allocation of storage is a great advantage, the with storing and retrieving data
can make a big difference. Sometimes linked lists are to . If the last item is deleted, the last but
one must then have its pointer changed to hold a NULL reference. This requires that the list is traversed to find
the last but one link, and its pointer set to a NULL reference.
Finally, linked lists waste memory in terms of extra reference points.
3.4 Arrays Overview 49

3.5 Comparison of Linked Lists with Arrays and Dynamic Arrays

Parameter Linked list Array Dynamic array
Indexing O() O(1) O(1)
O(), if array is not full (for
Insertion/deletion at beginning O(1) O()
shifting the elements)
O(1), if array is not full
Insertion at ending O() O(1), if array is not full
O(), if array is full
Deletion at ending O() O(1) O()
Insertion in middle O() O()
Deletion in middle O() O()
Wasted space O() 0 O()
3.6 Singly Linked Lists

Generally "linked list" means a singly linked list. This list consists of a number of nodes in which each node has
a pointer to the following element. The link of the last node in the list is NULL, which indicates the end of
the list.
4 15 7 40 NULL
Head
Following is a type declaration for a linked list of integers:
#Node of a Singly Linked List
class Node:
#constructor
def __init__(self):
self.data = None
self.next = None
#method for setting the data field of the node
def setData(self,data):
self.data = data
#method for getting the data field of the node
def getData(self):
return self.data
#method for setting the next field of the node
def setNext(self,next):
self.next = next
#method for getting the next field of the node
def getNext(self):
return self.next
#returns true if the node points to another node
def hasNext(self):
return self.next != None
Basic Operations on a List

Traversing the list
Inserting an item in the list
Deleting an item from the list
Traversing the Linked List

Let us assume that the points to the first node of the list. To traverse the list we do the following.
Follow the pointers.
3.5 Comparison of Linked Lists with Arrays and Dynamic Arrays 50

Display the contents of the nodes (or count) as they are traversed.
Stop when the next pointer points to NULL.
5 1 17 4 NULL
Head
The ListLength() function takes a linked list as input and counts the number of nodes in the list. The function
given below can be used for printing the list data with extra print function.
def listLength(self):
current = self.head
count = 0
while current != None:
count = count + 1
current = current.getNext()
return count
Time Complexity: O(), for scanning the list of size .
Space Complexity: O(1), for creating a temporary variable.
Singly Linked List Insertion

Insertion into a singly-linked list has three cases:
Inserting a new node before the head (at the beginning)
Inserting a new node after the tail (at the end of the list)
Inserting a new node at the middle of the list (random location)
Note: To insert an element in the linked list at some position , assume that after inserting the element the
position of this new node is .
Inserting a Node in Singly Linked List at the Beginning

In this case, a new node is inserted before the current head node. needs to be modified (new
nodes next pointer) and it can be done in two steps:
Update the next pointer of new node, to point to the current head.
New node
data 15 7 40 NULL
head
Update head pointer to point to the new node.
New node
data 15 7 40 NULL
Head
#method for inserting a new node at the beginning of the Linked List (at the head)
def insertAtBeginning(self,data):
newNode = Node()
newNode.setData(data)
if self.length == 0:
3.6 Singly Linked Lists 51

self.head = newNode
else:
newNode.setNext(self.head)
self.head = newNode
self.length += 1
Inserting a Node in Singly Linked List at the Ending

In this case, we need to modify (last nodes next pointer and new nodes next pointer).
New nodes next pointer points to NULL.
NULL
New node
4 15 7 0 data NULL
Head
Last nodes next pointer points to the new node.

New node
4 15 7 40 NULL
Head
#method for inserting a new node at the end of a Linked List

def insertAtEnd(self,data):
newNode = Node()
current = self.head
while current.getNext() != None:
current.setNext(newNode)
self.length += 1
Inserting a Node in Singly Linked List at the Middle

Let us assume that we are given a position where we want to insert the new node. In this case also, we need to
modify two next pointers.
If we want to add an element at position 3 then we stop at position 2. That means we traverse 2 nodes
and insert the new node. For simplicity let us assume that the second node is called node. The
new node points to the next node of the position where we want to add this node.
Position node
4 15 7 40 NULL
Head
data
New node
Position nodes next pointer now points to the new node.

Position node
4 15 7 40 NULL
Head data
New node
Let us write the code for all three cases. We must update the first element pointer in the calling function, not
just in the called function. For this reason we need to send a double pointer. The following code inserts a node
in the singly linked list.
#Method for inserting a new node at any position in a Linked List
def insertAtPos(self,pos,data):
if pos > self.length or pos < 0:
return None
else:
if pos == 0:
self.insertAtBeg(data)
else:
if pos == self.length:
self.insertAtEnd(data)
else:
newNode = Node()
count = 0
current = self.head
while count < pos-1:
count += 1
newNode.setNext(current.getNext())
self.length += 1
Note: We can implement the three variations of the operation separately.
Time Complexity: O(), since, in the worst case, we may need to insert the node at the end of the list.
Space Complexity: O(1), for creating one temporary variable.
Singly Linked List Deletion

Similar to insertion, here we also have three cases.
Deleting the first node
Deleting the last node
Deleting an intermediate node.
Deleting the First Node in Singly Linked List

First node (current head node) is removed from the list. It can be done in two steps:
Create a temporary node which will point to the same node as that of head.
4 15 7 40 NULL
Head Temp
Now, move the head nodes pointer to the next node and dispose of the temporary node.

4 15 7 40 NULL
Temp Head
#method to delete the first node of the linked list
def deleteFromBeginning(self):
print "The list is empty"
else:
self.head = self.head.getNext()
self.length -= 1
Deleting the Last Node in Singly Linked List

In this case, the last node is removed from the list. This operation is a bit trickier than removing the first node,
because the algorithm should find a node, which is previous to the tail. It can be done in three steps:
Traverse the list and while traversing maintain the previous node address also. By the time we reach the
end of the list, we will have two pointers, one pointing to the node and the other pointing to the node
the tail node.
4 15 7 40 NULL
Node previous to tail Tail

Head
Update previous nodes next pointer with NULL.
NULL
4 15 7 40 NULL

Head
Dispose of the tail node.

NULL
4 15 7 40 NULL

Head
#Method to delete the last node of the linked list

def deleteLastNodeFromSinglyLinkedList(self):
print "The list is empty"
else:
currentnode = self.head
previousnode = self.head
while currentnode.getNext() != None:
previousnode = currentnode
currentnode = currentnode.getNext()
previousnode.seNext(None)
self.length -= 1

Deleting an Intermediate Node in Singly Linked List

In this case, the node to be removed is two nodes. Head and tail links are not updated in
this case. Such a removal can be done in two steps:
Similar to the previous case, maintain the previous node while traversing the list. Once we find the node
to be deleted, change the previous nodes next pointer to the next pointer of the node to be deleted.
4 15 7 40 NULL
Head Previous node Node to be deleted
Dispose of the current node to be deleted.
4 15 7 40 NULL

#Delete with node from linked list
def deleteFromLinkedListWithNode(self, node):
raise ValueError("List is empty")
else:
current = self.head
previous = None
found = False
while not found:
if current == node:
found = True
elif current is None:
raise ValueError("Node not in Linked List")
else:
previous = current
if previous is None:
self.head = current.getNext()
else:
previous.seNext(current.getNext())
self.length -= 1
#Delete with data from linked list
def deleteValue(self,value):
while currentnode.next != None or currentnode.value != value:
if currentnode.value == value:
previousnode.next = currentnode.next
self.length -= 1
return
else:
currentnode = currentnode.next
print "The value provided is not present"
#Method to delete a node at a particular position
def deleteAtPosition(self,pos):
count = 0

if pos > self.length or pos < 0:
print "The position does not exist. Please enter a valid position"
else:
while currentnode.next != None or count < pos:
count = count + 1
if count == pos:
previousnode.next = currentnode.next
self.length -= 1
return
else:
currentnode = currentnode.next
Time Complexity: O(). In the worst case, we may need to delete the node at the end of the list.
Space Complexity: O(1), for one temporary variable.
Deleting Singly Linked List

Python is garbage-collected, so if you reduce the size of your list, it will reclaim memory.
def clear( self ) :
self.head = None
Time Complexity: O(1). Space Complexity: O(1)
3.7 Doubly Linked Lists

The of a doubly linked list (also called ) is that given a node in the list, we can
navigate in both directions. A node in a singly linked list cannot be removed unless we have the pointer to its
predecessor. But in a doubly linked list, we can delete a node even if we dont have the previous nodes address
(since each node has a left pointer pointing to the previous node and can move backward).
The primary of doubly linked lists are:
Each node requires an extra pointer, requiring more space.
The insertion or deletion of a node takes a bit longer (more pointer operations).
Similar to a singly linked list, let us implement the operations of a doubly linked list. If you understand the
singly linked list operations, then doubly linked list operations are obvious. Following is a type declaration for a
doubly linked list of integers:
class Node:
# If data is not given by user,its taken as None
def __init__(self, data=None, next=None, prev=None):
self.data = data
self.next = next
self.prev = prev
self.data = data
def getData(self):
return self.data
self.next = next
def getNext(self):
return self.next
def hasNext(self):
3.7 Doubly Linked Lists 56


def setPrev(self,prev):
self.prev = prev
def getPrev(self):
return self.prev
def hasPrev(self):
return self.prev != None
# __str__ returns string equivalent of Object
def __str__(self):
return "Node[Data = %s]" % (self.data,)
Doubly Linked List Insertion

Insertion into a doubly-linked list has three cases (same as a singly linked list):
Inserting a new node before the head.
Inserting a new node after the tail (at the end of the list).
Inserting a new node at the middle of the list.
Inserting a Node in Doubly Linked List at the Beginning

In this case, new node is inserted before the head node. Previous and next pointers need to be modified and it
can be done in two steps:
Update the right pointer of the new node to point to the current head node (dotted link in below figure)
and also make left pointer of new node as NULL.
Head
New node
data 15 7 40 NULL
NULL NULL
Update head nodes left pointer to point to the new node and make new node as head.
Head
data 15 7 40 NULL
NULL
def insertAtBeginning(self, data):

newNode = Node(data, None, None)
if (self.head == None): # To imply that if head == None
self.head = self.tail = newNode
else:
newNode.setPrev(None)
self.head.setPrev(newNode)
self.head = newNode
Inserting a Node in Doubly Linked List at the Ending

In this case, traverse the list till the end and insert the new node.
New node right pointer points to NULL and left pointer points to the end of the list.

Head List end node New node
4 15 7 data
NULL NULL NULL
Update right pointer of last node to point to new node.
Head List end node New node
4 15 7 data
NULL NULL
def insertAtEnd(self, data):
if (self.head == None): # To imply that if head == None
self.head = Node(data)
self.tail = self.head
else:
current = self.head
while(current.getNext() != None):
current.setNext(Node(data, None, current))
self.tail = current.getNext()
Inserting a Node in Doubly Linked List at the Middle

As discussed in singly linked lists, traverse the list to the position node and insert the new node.
right pointer points to the next node of the where we want to insert the new
node. Also, left pointer points to the node.
NULL Position node
4 15 7 40 NULL
Head
data
New node
Position node right pointer points to the new node and the of position node left pointer points
to new node.
NULL Position node
4 15 7 40 NULL
Head data
New node
Now, let us write the code for all of these three cases. We must update the first element pointer in the calling
function, not just in the called function. For this reason we need to send a double pointer. The following code
inserts a node in the doubly linked list.

def getNode(self, index):

currentNode = self.head
if currentNode == None:
return None
i=0
while i < index and currentNode.getNext() is not None::
currentNode = currentNode.getNext()
break
i += 1
return currentNode
def insertAtGivenPosition(self, index, data):
newNode = Node(data)
if self.head == None or index == 0:
self.insertAtBeginning(data)
elif index > 0:
temp = self.getNode(index)
if temp == None or temp.getNext() == None:
self.insert(data)
else:
newNode.setNext(temp.getNext())
newNode.setPrev(temp)
temp.getNext().setPrev(newNode)
temp.setNext(newNode)
Time Complexity: O(). In the worst case, we may need to insert the node at the end of the list.
Space Complexity: O(1), for a temporary variable.
Doubly Linked List Deletion

Similar to singly linked list deletion, here we have three cases:
Deleting the first node
Deleting the last node
Deleting an intermediate node
Deleting the First Node in Doubly Linked List

In this case, the first node (current head node) is removed from the list. It can be done in two steps:
Create a temporary node which will point to the same node as that of head.
NULL
4 15 7 40 NULL
Head Temp
Now, move the head nodes pointer to the next node and change the heads left pointer to NULL. Then,
dispose of the temporary node.
NULL
4 15 7 40 NULL
NULL
Temp Head

Deleting the Last Node in Doubly Linked List

This operation is a bit trickier, than removing the first node, because the algorithm should find a node, which is
previous to the tail first. This can be done in three steps:
Traverse the list and while traversing maintain the previous node address also. By the time we reach the
end of the list, we will have two pointers, one pointing to the tail and the other pointing to the node
before the tail.
NULL
4 15 7 40 NULL
Previous node to Tail Tail

Head
Update the next pointer of previous node to the tail node with NULL.
NULL
NULL
4 15 7 40 NULL

Head

NULL
4 15 7 40 NULL

Head
Deleting an Intermediate Node in Doubly Linked List

In this case, the node to be removed is two nodes, and the head and tail links are not
updated. The removal can be done in two steps:
Similar to the previous case, maintain the previous node while also traversing the list. Upon locating the
node to be deleted, change the previous nodes next pointer to the next node of the node to be deleted.
4 15 7 40 NULL
Dispose of the current node to be deleted.

4 15 7 40 NULL
#Deleting element at given position

def getNode(self, index):
return None
i=0
while i <= index:
break
i += 1
return currentNode
def delteAtGivenPosition(self, index):
temp = self.getNode(index)
if temp:
temp.getPrev.setNext(temp.getNext())
if temp.getNext():
temp.getNext().setPrev(temp.getPrev())
temp.setPrev(None)
temp.setNext(None)
temp.setData(None)
#Deleting with given data
def deleteWithData(self, data):
temp = self.head
while temp is not None:
if temp.getData() == data:
# if it's not the first element
if temp.getNext() is not None:
temp.getNext().setNext(temp.getNext())
temp.getNext().setPrev(temp.getPrev())
else:
# otherwise we have no prev (it's None), head is the next one, and prev becomes None
self.head = temp.getNext()
temp.getNext().setPrev(None)
temp = temp.getNext()
Time Complexity: O(), for scanning the complete list of size .
Space Complexity: O(1), for creating one temporary variable.
3.8 Circular Linked Lists

In singly linked lists and doubly linked lists, the end of lists are indicated with NULL value. But circular linked
lists do not have ends. While traversing the circular linked lists we should be careful; otherwise we will be
traversing the list infinitely. In circular linked lists, each node has a successor. Note that unlike singly linked
lists, there is no node with NULL pointer in a circularly linked list. In some situations, circular linked lists are
useful. There is no difference in the node declaration of circular linked lists compared to singly linked lists.
For example, when several processes are using the same computer resource (CPU) for the same amount of time,
we have to assure that no process accesses the resource before all other processes do (round robin algorithm).
The following is a type declaration for a circular linked list:
#Node of a Circular Linked List
class Node:
#constructor
def __init__(self):
3.8 Circular Linked Lists 61

self.data = None
self.next = None
self.data = data
def getData(self):
return self.data
self.next = next
def getNext(self):
return self.next
def hasNext(self):
In a circular linked list, we access the elements using the node (similar to node in singly linked list
and doubly linked lists).
Counting Nodes in a Circular List
4 15 7 40
Head
The circular list is accessible through the node marked . To count the nodes, the list has to be traversed
from the node marked , with the help of a dummy node , and stop the counting when reaches
the starting node . If the list is empty, will be NULL, and in that case set = 0. Otherwise, set the
current pointer to the first node, and keep on counting till the current pointer reaches the starting node.
#This method would be a member of other class (say, CircularList)
def circularListLength(self):
return 0
count = 1
while currentNode != self.head:
count = count + 1
retur count
Time Complexity: O(), for scanning the complete list of size . Space Complexity: O(1), for temporary variable.
Printing the Contents of a Circular List
4 15 7 40
Head
We assume here that the list is being accessed by its node. Since all the nodes are arranged in a circular
fashion, the node of the list will be the node previous to the node. Let us assume we want to print the

contents of the nodes starting with the node. Print its contents, move to the next node and continue
printing till we reach the node again.
def printCircularList(self):
if currentNode == None: return 0
print (currentNode.getData())
while currentNode != self.head:
print (currentNode.getData())
Inserting a Node at the End of a Circular Linked List

Let us add a node containing , at the end of a list (circular list) headed by . The new node will be placed
just after the tail node (which is the last node of the list), which means it will have to be inserted in between the
tail node and the first node.
Create a new node and initially keep its next pointer pointing to itself.
4 15 7 40
data
Head
New node
Update the next pointer of the new node with the head node and also traverse the list to the tail. That
means in a circular list we should stop at the node whose next node is head.
Previous node of head
4 15 7 40
data
Head
New node
Update the next pointer of the previous node to point to the new node and we get the list as shown
below.
4 15 17 40 data
Head
def insertAtEndInCLL (self, data):
current = self.head
newNode = Node()
while current.getNext != self.head:
newNode.setNext(newNode)
if self.head == None:
self.head = newNode;
else:

Inserting a Node at the Front of a Circular Linked List

The only difference between inserting a node at the beginning and at the end is that, after inserting the new
node, we just need to update the pointer. The steps for doing this are given below:
Create a new node and initially keep its next pointer pointing to itself.
4 15 7 40
data
New node
Head
Update the next pointer of the new node with the head node and also traverse the list until the tail. That
means in a circular list we should stop at the node which is its previous node in the list.
4 15 7 40
Head data New node
Update the previous head node in the list to point to the new node.
4 15 7 40
Head data
New node
Make the new node as the head.
data 4 15 7 40
Head
def insertAtBeginInCLL (self, data):
current = self.head
newNode = Node()
while current.getNext != self.head:
newNode.setNext(newNode)
self.head = newNode;
else:

self.head = newNode
Deleting the Last Node in a Circular List

The list has to be traversed to reach the last but one node. This has to be named as the tail node, and its next
field has to point to the first node. Consider the following list. To delete the last node 40, the list has to be
traversed till you reach 7. The next field of 7 has to be changed to point to 60, and this node must be renamed
.
Traverse the list and find the tail node and its previous node.
60 4 15 7 40
Previous node to Node to be

deleting node deleted
Head
Update the tail nodes previous node pointer to point to head.
60 4 15 7 40

Head
60 4 15 7 40

Head
def deleteLastNodeFromCLL (self):
temp = self.head
current = self.head
print ("List Empty")
return
while current.getNext() != self.head:
temp = current;
temp.setNext(current.getNext())
return
Time Complexity: O(), for scanning the complete list of size . Space Complexity: O(1)
Deleting the First Node in a Circular List

The first node can be deleted by simply replacing the next field of the tail node with the next field of the first
node.
Find the tail node of the linked list by traversing the list. Tail node is the previous node to the head node
which we want to delete.

60 4 15 7 40
Node to be Previous node to

deleted deleting node
Head
Create a temporary node which will point to the head. Also, update the tail nodes next pointer to point
to next node of head (as shown below).
Temp
60 4 15 7 40
Previous node to
Node to be
deleting node
deleted
Head
Now, move the head pointer to next node. Create a temporary node which will point to head. Also,
update the tail nodes next pointer to point to next node of head (as shown below).
Temp
60 4 15 7 40
Node to be Previous node to

deleted deleting node
Head
def deleteFrontNodeFromCLL (self):

current = self.head
print ("List Empty")
return
while current.getNext() != self.head:
current.setNext(self.head.getNext())
self.head = self.head.getNext()
return
Time Complexity: O(), for scanning the complete list of size . Space Complexity: O(1)
Applications of Circular List

Circular linked lists are used in managing the computing resources of a computer. We can use circular lists for
implementing stacks and queues.
3.9 A Memory-efficient Doubly Linked List

In conventional implementation, we need to keep a forward pointer to the next item on the list and a backward
pointer to the previous item. That means elements in doubly linked list implementations consist of data, a
pointer to the next node and a pointer to the previous node in the list as shown below.
Conventional Node Definition
class Node:
#constructor
def __init__(self):
self.data = None
3.9 A Memory-efficient Doubly Linked List 66
self.next = None
self.data = data
def getData(self):
return self.data
self.next = next
def getNext(self):
return self.next
def hasNext(self):
Recently a journal (Sinha) presented an alternative implementation of the doubly linked list ADT, with insertion,
traversal and deletion operations. This implementation is based on pointer difference. Each node uses only one
pointer field to traverse the list back and forth.
New Node Definition
class Node:
#constructor
def __init__(self):
self.data = None
self.ptrdiff = None
self.data = data
def getData(self):
return self.data
#method for setting the pointer difference field of the node
def setPtrDiff(self, prev, next):
self.ptrdiff = prev ^ next
def getPtrDiff(self):
return self.ptrdiff
A B C D NULL
Head
Pointer differences
The pointer field contains the difference between the pointer to the next node and the pointer to the
previous node. The pointer difference is calculated by using exclusive-or () operation.
= .
The of the start node (head node) is the of NULL and node (next node to head). Similarly, the
of end node is the of node (previous to end node) and NULL. As an example, consider the
following linked list.
In the example above,
The next pointer of A is: NULL B
The next pointer of B is: A C
The next pointer of C is: B D
The next pointer of D is: C NULL
Why does it work?

To find the answer to this question let us consider the properties of :
3.9 A Memory-efficient Doubly Linked List 67

XX=0
X0=X
X Y = Y X (symmetric)
(X Y) Z = X (Y Z) (transitive)
For the example above, let us assume that we are at C node and want to move to B. We know that Cs is
defined as B D. If we want to move to B, performing on Cs with D would give B. This is due to the
fact that
(B D) D = B (since, D D=0)
Similarly, if we want to move to D, then we have to apply to Cs with B to give D.
(B D) B = D (since, B B=0)
From the above discussion we can see that just by using a single pointer, we can move back and forth. A
memory-efficient implementation of a doubly linked list is possible with minimal compromising of timing
efficiency.
3.10 Unrolled Linked Lists

One of the biggest advantages of linked lists over arrays is that inserting an element at any location takes only
O(1) time. However, it takes O() to search for an element in a linked list. There is a simple variation of the singly
linked list called . An unrolled linked list stores multiple elements in each node (let us call it
a block for our convenience). In each block, a circular linked list is used to connect all nodes.
List Head
blockHead blockHead blockHead
10 1 30 6 70 3 45 2 91 19 4 17 /
Assume that there will be no more than elements in the unrolled linked list at any time. To simplify this
problem, all blocks, except the last one, should contain exactly elements. Thus, there will be no more than
blocks at any time.
Searching for an element in Unrolled Linked Lists

List Head
10 1 30 6 70 3 45 2 91 19 4 17 /
In unrolled linked lists, we can find the element in O():

1. Traverse the to the one that contains the node, i.e., the th block. It takes O() since
we may find it by going through no more than blocks.
2. Find the ( mod )th node in the circular linked list of this block. It also takes O() since there are no
more than nodes in a single block.
Inserting an element in Unrolled Linked Lists

When inserting a node, we have to re-arrange the nodes in the unrolled linked list to maintain the properties
previously mentioned, that each block contains nodes. Suppose that we insert a node after the node,
and should be placed in the block. Nodes in the block and in the blocks after the block have to be
shifted toward the tail of the list so that each of them still have nodes. In addition, a new block needs to be
added to the tail if the last block of the list is out of space, i.e., it has more than nodes.
3.10 Unrolled Linked Lists 68

List Head
10 1 22 30 6 70 3 45 2 19 4 17 /
List Head Shifting element Shifting element
10 1 22 30 6 70 3 45 2 19 4 17 /
Performing Shift Operation

Note that each operation, which includes removing a node from the tail of the circular linked list in a block
and inserting a node to the head of the circular linked list in the block after, takes only O(1). The total time
complexity of an insertion operation for unrolled linked lists is therefore O(); there are at most O() blocks
and therefore at most O() shift operations.
1. A temporary pointer is needed to store the tail of .
temp
A B
70 3 45 19 4 17
2. In block , move the next pointer of the head node to point to the second-to-last node, so that the
tail node of can be removed.
temp
A B
70 3 45 19 4 17
3. Let the next pointer of the node, which will be shifted (the tail node of ), point to the tail node of .
A B
70 3 19 4 17
45
temp
4. Let the next pointer of the head node of point to the node temp points to.
A B
70 3 19 4 17
45
temp
5. Finally, set the head pointer of to point to the node points to. Now the node temp points to
becomes the new head node of .
A B
70 3 45 19 4 17
temp

6. pointer can be thrown away. We have completed the shift operation to move the original tail
node of to become the new head node of .
A B
70 3 45 19 4 17
Performance
With unrolled linked lists, there are a couple of advantages, one in speed and one in space. First, if the number
of elements in each block is appropriately sized (e.g., at most the size of one cache line), we get noticeably better
cache performance from the improved memory locality. Second, since we have O(/) links, where is the
number of elements in the unrolled linked list and is the number of elements we can store in any block, we
can also save an appreciable amount of space, which is particularly noticeable if each element is small.
Comparing Doubly Linked Lists and Unrolled Linked Lists

To compare the overhead for an unrolled list, elements in doubly linked list implementations consist of data, a
pointer to the next node, and a pointer to the previous node in the list, as shown below.
class Node:
# If data is not given by user,its taken as None
def __init__(self, data=None, next=None, prev=None):
self.data = data
self.next = next
self.prev = prev
Assuming we have 4 byte pointers, each node is going to take 8 bytes. But the allocation overhead for the node
could be anywhere between 8 and 16 bytes. Lets go with the best case and assume it will be 8 bytes. So, if we
want to store 1K items in this list, we are going to have 16KB of overhead.
Now, lets think about an unrolled linked list node (let us call it ). It will look something like this:
class LinkedBlock:
def __init__(self, nextBlock=None, blockHead=None):
self.next = nextBlock
self.head = blockHead
self.nodeCount = 0
Therefore, allocating a single node (12 bytes + 8 bytes of overhead) with an array of 100 elements (400 bytes + 8
bytes of overhead) will now cost 428 bytes, or 4.28 bytes per element. Thinking about our 1K items from above,
it would take about 4.2KB of overhead, which is close to 4x better than our original list. Even if the list becomes
severely fragmented and the item arrays are only 1/2 full on average, this is still an improvement. Also, note
that we can tune the array size to whatever gets us the best overhead for our application.
Implementation
class Node:
#constructor
def __init__(self):
self.value = None
self.next = None
class LinkedBlock:
#constructor
def __init__(self):
self.head = None
self.next = None
nodeCount = 0
blockSize = 2
blockHead = None
#create an empty block

def newLinkedBlock():
block=LinkedBlock()
block.next=None
block.head=None
block.nodeCount=0
return block
#create a node
def newNode(value):
temp=Node()
temp.next=None
temp.value=value
return temp
def searchElements(blockHead, k):
#find the block
j=(k+blockSize-1)//blockSize #k-th node is in the j-th block
p=blockHead
j -= 1
while(j):
p=p.next
j -= 1
fLinkedBlock=p
#find the node
q=p.head
k=k%blockSize
if(k==0):
k=blockSize
k = p.nodeCount+1-k
k -= 1
while (k):
q=q.next
k -= 1
fNode=q
return fLinkedBlock, fNode
#start shift operation from block *p
def shift(A):
B=A
global blockHead
while(A.nodeCount > blockSize): #if this block still have to shift
if(A.next==None): #reach the end. A little different
A.next=newLinkedBlock()
B=A.next
temp=A.head.next
A.head.next=A.head.next.next
B.head=temp
temp.next=temp
A.nodeCount -= 1
B.nodeCount += 1
else:
B=A.next
temp=A.head.next
A.head.next=A.head.next.next
temp.next=B.head.next
B.head.next=temp
B.head=temp
A.nodeCount -= 1
B.nodeCount += 1
A=B
def addElement(k, x):
global blockHead
r = newLinkedBlock()

p = Node()
if(blockHead == None): #initial, first node and block
blockHead=newLinkedBlock()
blockHead.head=newNode(x)
blockHead.head.next=blockHead.head
blockHead.nodeCount += 1
else:
if(k==0): #special case for k=0.
p=blockHead.head
q=p.next
p.next=newNode(x)
p.next.next=q
blockHead.head=p.next
blockHead.nodeCount += 1
shift(blockHead)
else:
r, p = searchElements(blockHead, k)
q=p
while(q.next != p):
q=q.next
q.next=newNode(x)
q.next.next=p
r.nodeCount += 1
shift(r)
return blockHead
def searchElement(blockHead, k):
q, p = searchElements(blockHead, k)
return p.value
blockHead = addElement(0,11)
searchElement(blockHead, 1)
3.11 Skip Lists

Binary trees can be used for representing abstract data types such as dictionaries and ordered lists. They work
well when the elements are inserted in a random order. Some sequences of operations, such as inserting the
elements in order, produce degenerate data structures that give very poor performance. If it were possible to
randomly permute the list of items to be inserted, trees would work well with high probability for any input
sequence. In most cases queries must be answered on-line, so randomly permuting the input is impractical.
Balanced tree algorithms re-arrange the tree as operations are performed to maintain certain balance conditions
and assure good performance.
Skip list is a data structure that can be used as an alternative to balanced binary trees (refer to chapter).
As compared to a binary tree, skip lists allow quick search, insertion and deletion of elements. This is achieved
by using probabilistic balancing rather than strictly enforce balancing. It is basically a linked list with additional
pointers such that intermediate nodes can be skipped. It uses a random number generator to make some
decisions.
In an ordinary sorted linked list, search, insert, and delete are in O() because the list must be scanned node-
by-node from the head to find the relevant node. If somehow we could scan down the list in bigger steps (skip
down, as it were), we would reduce the cost of scanning. This is the fundamental idea behind Skip Lists.
Skip Lists with One Level

3 7 12 19 23 29 43 70
3.11 Skip Lists 72

Skip Lists with Two Levels

3 7 12 19 23 29 43 70
Skip Lists with Three Levels

3 7 12 19 23 29 43 70
This section gives algorithms to search for, insert and delete elements in a dictionary or symbol table. The
Search operation returns the contents of the value associated with the desired key or failure if the key is not
present. The Insert operation associates a specified key with a new value (inserting the key if it had not already
been present). The Delete operation deletes the specified key. It is easy to support additional operations such as
find the minimum key or find the next key.
Each element is represented by a node, the level of which is chosen randomly when the node is inserted without
regard for the number of elements in the data structure. A level i node has i forward pointers, indexed 1 through
i. We do not need to store the level of a node in the node. Levels are capped at some appropriate constant
. The level of a list is the maximum level currently in the list (or 1 if the list is empty). The header of a
list has forward pointers at levels one through MaxLevel. The forward pointers of the header at levels higher
than the current maximum level of the list point to NULL.
Initialization
An element NIL is allocated and given a key greater than any legal key. All levels of all skip lists are terminated
with NIL. A new list is initialized so that the level of the list is equal to 1 and all forward pointers of the lists
header point to NIL.
Search for an element

We search for an element by traversing forward pointers that do not overshoot the node containing the element
being searched for. When no more progress can be made at the current level of forward pointers, the search
moves down to the next level. When we can make no more progress at level 1, we must be immediately in front
of the node that contains the desired element (if it is in the list).
Insertion and Deletion Algorithms

To insert or delete a node, we simply search and splice. A vector update is maintained so that when the search
is complete (and we are ready to perform the splice), update[i] contains a pointer to the rightmost node of level i
or higher that is to the left of the location of the insertion/deletion. If an insertion generates a node with a level
greater than the previous maximum level of the list, we update the maximum level of the list and initialize the
appropriate portions of the update vector. After each deletion, we check if we have deleted the maximum element
of the list and if so, decrease the maximum level of the list.
Choosing a Random Level

Initially, we discussed a probability distribution where half of the nodes that have level i pointers also have level
i+1 pointers. To get away from magic constants, we say that a fraction p of the nodes with level i pointers also
have level i+1 pointers. (for our original discussion, p = 1/2). Levels are generated randomly by an algorithm.
Levels are generated without reference to the number of elements in the list
Performance
In a simple linked list that consists of elements, to perform a search comparisons are required in the worst
case. If a second pointer pointing two nodes ahead is added to every node, the number of comparisons goes
down to /2 + 1 in the worst case. Adding one more pointer to every fourth node and making them point to the
fourth node ahead reduces the number of comparisons to /2 + 2. If this strategy is continued so that every
3.11 Skip Lists 73

node with pointers points to 2 1 nodes ahead, O() performance is obtained and the number of pointers
has only doubled ( + /2 + /4 + /8 + /16 + .... = 2).
The find, insert, and remove operations on ordinary binary search trees are efficient, O(), when the input
data is random; but less efficient, O(), when the input data is ordered. Skip List performance for these same
operations and for any data set is about as good as that of randomly-built binary search trees - namely O().
Comparing Skip Lists and Unrolled Linked Lists

In simple terms, Skip Lists are sorted linked lists with two differences:
The nodes in an ordinary list have one next reference. The nodes in a Skip List have many
references (also called references).
The number of references for a given node is determined probabilistically.
We speak of a Skip List node having levels, one level per forward reference. The number of levels in a node is
called the of the node. In an ordinary sorted list, insert, remove, and find operations require sequential
traversal of the list. This results in O() performance per operation. Skip Lists allow intermediate nodes in the
list to be skipped during a traversal - resulting in an expected performance of O() per operation.
Implementation
import random
import math
class Node(object):
def __init__(self, data, level=0):
self.data = data
self.next = [None] * level
def __str__(self):
return "Node(%s,%s)" % (self.data, len(self.next))
__repr__ = __str__
class SkipList(object):
def __init__(self, max_level=8):
self.max_level = max_level
n = Node(None, max_level)
self.head = n
self.verbose = False
def randomLevel(self, max_level):
num = random.randint(1, 2**max_level - 1)
lognum = math.log(num, 2)
level = int(math.floor(lognum))
return max_level - level
def updateList(self, data):
update = [None] * (self.max_level)
n = self.head
self._n_traverse = 0
level = self.max_level - 1
while level >= 0:
if self.verbose and \
n.next[level] != None and n.next[level].data >= data:
print 'DROP down from level', level + 1
while n.next[level] != None and n.next[level].data < data:
self._n_traverse += 1
if self.verbose:
print 'AT level', level, 'data', n.next[level].data
n = n.next[level]
update[level] = n
level -= 1
return update
def find(self, data, update=None):
if update is None:
update = self.updateList(data)
if len(update) > 0:
3.11 Skip Lists 74

candidate = update[0].next[0]
if candidate != None and candidate.data == data:
return candidate
return None
def insertNode(self, data, level=None):
if level is None:
level = self.randomLevel(self.max_level)
node = Node(data, level)
update = self.updateList(data)
if self.find(data, update) == None:
for i in range(level):
node.next[i] = update[i].next[i]
update[i].next[i] = node
def printLevel(sl, level):
print 'level %d:' % level,
node = sl.head.next[level]
while node:
print node.data, '=>',
node = node.next[level]
print 'END'
x = SkipList(4)
for i in range(0, 20, 2):
x.insertNode(i)
printLevel(x, 0)
printLevel(x, 1)
printLevel(x, 2)
3.12 Linked Lists: Problems & Solutions

Problem-1 Implement Stack using Linked List.
Solution: Refer to chapter.
Problem-2 Find node from the end of a Linked List.
Solution: Brute-Force Method: Start with the first node and count the number of nodes present after that
node. If the number of nodes is < 1 then return saying fewer number of nodes in the list. If the number of
nodes is > 1 then go to next node. Continue this until the numbers of nodes after current node are 1.
Time Complexity: O(2 ), for scanning the remaining list (from current node) for each node.
Space Complexity: O(1).
Problem-3 Can we improve the complexity of Problem-2?
Solution: Yes, using hash table. As an example consider the following list.
5 1 17 4 NULL
Head
In this approach, create a hash table whose entries are < , >. That means, key is the
position of the node in the list and value is the address of that node.
Position in List Address of Node
1 Address of 5 node
2 Address of 1 node
3 Address of 17 node
4 Address of 4 node
By the time we traverse the complete list (for creating the hash table), we can find the list length. Let us say the
list length is . To find from the end of linked list, we can convert this to - + 1 from the beginning.
Since we already know the length of the list, it is just a matter of returning - + 1 key value from the hash
table.
3.12 Linked Lists: Problems & Solutions 75

Time Complexity: Time for creating the hash table, () = O().

Space Complexity: Since we need to create a hash table of size , O().
Problem-4 Can we use Problem-3 approach for solving Problem-2 without creating the hash table?
Solution: Yes. If we observe the Problem-3 solution, what we are actually doing is finding the size of the linked
list. That means we are using the hash table to find the size of the linked list. We can find the length of the
linked list just by starting at the head node and traversing the list. So, we can find the length of the list without
creating the hash table. After finding the length, compute + 1 and with one more scan we can get the
+ 1 node from the beginning. This solution needs two scans: one for finding the length of the list and the
other for finding + 1 node from the beginning.
Time Complexity: Time for finding the length + Time for finding the - + 1 node from the beginning.
Therefore, ( = O() + O() O().
Space Complexity: O(1). Hence, no need to create the hash table.
Problem-5 Can we solve Problem-2 in one scan?
Solution: Yes. Efficient Approach: Use two pointers and . Initially, both point to head node of
the list. starts moving only after has made moves. From there both move forward until
reaches the end of the list. As a result points to node from the end of the linked list.
Note: At any point of time both move one node at a time.
def nthNodeFromEnd( self, n ):
if 0 > n:
return None
# count k units from the self.head.
temp = self.head
count = 0
while count < n and None != temp:
temp = temp.next
count += 1
# if the LinkedList does not contain k elements, return None
if count < n or None == temp:
return None
# keeping tab on the nth element from temp, slide temp until
# temp equals self.tail. Then return the nth element.
nth = self.head
while None != temp.next:
temp = temp.next
nth = nth.next
return nth
Time Complexity: O(). Space Complexity: O(1).
Problem-6 Check whether the given linked list is either NULL-terminated or ends in a cycle (cyclic).
Solution: Brute-Force Approach. As an example, consider the following linked list which has a loop in it. The
difference between this list and the regular list is that, in this list, there are two nodes whose next pointers are
the same. In regular singly linked lists (without a loop) each nodes next pointer is unique. That means the
repetition of next pointers indicates the existence of a loop.
One simple and brute force way of solving this is, start with the first node and see whether there is any node
whose next pointer is the current nodes address. If there is a node with the same address then that indicates
that some other node is pointing to the current node and we can say a loop exists.

Continue this process for all the nodes of the linked list.
Does this method work? As per the algorithm, we are checking for the next pointer addresses, but how do we
find the end of the linked list (otherwise we will end up in an infinite loop)?
Note: If we start with a node in a loop, this method may work depending on the size of the loop.
Problem-7 Can we use the hashing technique for solving Problem-6?
Solution: Yes. Using Hash Tables we can solve this problem.
Algorithm:
Traverse the linked list nodes one by one.
Check if the address of the node is available in the hash table or not.
If it is already available in the hash table, that indicates that we are visiting the node that was already
visited. This is possible only if the given linked list has a loop in it.
If the address of the node is not available in the hash table, insert that nodes address into the hash
table.
Continue this process until we reach the end of the linked list we find the loop.
Time Complexity: O() for scanning the linked list. Note that we are doing a scan of only the input.
Space Complexity: O() for hash table.
Problem-8 Can we solve Problem-6 using the sorting technique?
Algorithm:
Traverse the linked list nodes one by one and take all the next pointer values into an array.
Sort the array that has the next node pointers.
If there is a loop in the linked list, definitely two next node pointers will be pointing to the same node.
After sorting if there is a loop in the list, the nodes whose next pointers are the same will end up
adjacent in the sorted list.
If any such pair exists in the sorted list then we say the linked list has a loop in it.
Time Complexity: O() for sorting the next pointers array.
Space Complexity: O() for the next pointers array.
Problem with the above algorithm: The above algorithm works only if we can find the length of the list. But if
the list has a loop then we may end up in an infinite loop. Due to this reason the algorithm fails.
Problem-9 Can we solve the Problem-6 in O()?
Solution: Yes. Efficient Approach (Memoryless Approach): This problem was solved by . The solution is
named the Floyd cycle finding algorithm. It uses pointers moving at different speeds to walk the linked list.
Once they enter the loop they are expected to meet, which denotes that there is a loop. This works because the
only way a faster moving pointer would point to the same location as a slower moving pointer is if somehow the
entire list or a part of it is circular. Think of a tortoise and a hare running on a track. The faster running hare
will catch up with the tortoise if they are running in a loop.
As an example, consider the following example and trace out the Floyd algorithm. From the diagrams below we
can see that after the final step they are meeting at some point in the loop which may not be the starting point
of the loop.
Note: () moves one pointer at a time and () moves two pointers at a time.
slowPtr
fastPtr
slowPtr fastPtr

fastPtr
slowPtr
slowPtr
fastPtr
slowPtr
fastPt
r
fastPtr slowPt
r
slowPtr
fastPt
r
def detectCycle(self):
fastPtr = self.head
slowPtr = self.head
while (fastPtr and slowPtr):
fastPtr = fastPtr.getNext()
if (fastPtr == slowPtr):
return True
if fastPtr == None:
return False
if (fastPtr == slowPtr):
return True
slowPtr = slowPtr.getNext()
Problem-10 We are given a pointer to the first element of a linked list . There are two possibilities for , it
either ends (snake) or its last element points back to one of the earlier elements in the list (snail). Give an
algorithm that tests whether a given list is a snake or a snail.
Solution: It is the same as Problem-6.

Problem-11 Check whether the given linked list is NULL-terminated or not. If there is a cycle find the start
node of the loop.
Solution: The solution is an extension to the solution in Problem-9. After finding the loop in the linked list, we
initialize the to the head of the linked list. From that point onwards both and move only
one node at a time. The point at which they meet is the start of the loop. Generally we use this method for
removing the loops. Let and y be travelers such that y is walking twice as fast as (i.e. = 2). Further, let s
be the place where and first started walking at the same time. Then when x and y meet again, the distance
from to the start of the loop is the exact same distance from the present meeting place of and to the start of
the loop.
def detectCycleStart( self ) :
if None == self.head or None == self.head.next:
return None
# slow and fast both started at head after one step,
# slow is at self.head.next and fast is at self.head.next.next
slow = self.head.next
fast = slow.next
# each keep walking until they meet again.
while slow != fast:
slow = slow.next
try:
fast = fast.next.next
except AttributeError:
return None # no cycle if NoneType reached
# from self.head to beginning of loop is same as from fast to beginning of loop
slow = self.head
while slow != fast:
slow = slow.next
fast = fast.next
return slow # beginning of loop
Problem-12 From the previous discussion and problems we understand that the meeting of tortoise and
hare concludes the existence of the loop, but how does moving the tortoise to the beginning of the linked list
while keeping the hare at the meeting place, followed by moving both one step at a time, make them meet at
the starting point of the cycle?
Solution: This problem is at the heart of number theory. In the Floyd cycle finding algorithm, notice that the
tortoise and the hare will meet when they are , where is the loop length. Furthermore, the tortoise is at
the midpoint between the hare and the beginning of the sequence because of the way they move. Therefore the
tortoise is away from the beginning of the sequence as well.
If we move both one step at a time, from the position of the tortoise and from the start of the sequence, we know
that they will meet as soon as both are in the loop, since they are , a multiple of the loop length, apart.
One of them is already in the loop, so we just move the other one in single step until it enters the loop, keeping
the other away from it at all times.
Problem-13 In Floyd cycle finding algorithm, does it work if we use steps 2 and 3 instead of 1 and 2?
Solution: Yes, but the complexity might be high. Trace out an example.
Problem-14 Check whether the given linked list is NULL-terminated. If there is a cycle, find the length of the
loop.
Solution: This solution is also an extension of the basic cycle detection problem. After finding the loop in the
linked list, keep the as it is. The keeps on moving until it again comes back to . While
moving , use a counter variable which increments at the rate of 1.
def findLoopLength( self ):
if None == self.head or None == self.head.next:
return 0
# slow and fast both started at head after one step,
# slow is at self.head.next and fast is at self.head.next.next
slow = self.head.next
fast = slow.next

# each keep walking until they meet again.

while slow != fast:
slow = slow.next
try:
except AttributeError:
return 0 # no cycle if NoneType reached
loopLength = 0
slow = slow.next
while slow != fast:
slow = slow.next
loopLength = loopLength + 1
return loopLength
Problem-15 Insert a node in a sorted linked list.
Solution: Traverse the list and find a position for the element and insert it.
def orderedInsert(self,item):
current = self.head
previous = None
stop = False
while current != None and not stop:
if current.getData() > item:
stop = True
else:
previous = current
temp = Node(item)
if previous == None:
temp.setNext(self.head)
self.head = temp
else:
temp.setNext(current)
previous.setNext(temp)
Problem-16 Reverse a singly linked list.
Solution: This algorithm reverses this singly linked list in place, in O(). The function uses three pointers to
walk the list and reverse link direction between each pair of nodes.
# Iterative version
def reverseList(self):
last = None
current = self.head
while(current is not None):
nextNode = current.getNext()
current.setNext(last)
last = current
current = nextNode
self.head = last
Recursive version: We can find it easier to start from the bottom up, by asking and answering tiny questions
(this is the approach in The Little Lisper):
What is the reverse of NULL (the empty list)? NULL.
What is the reverse of a one element list? The element itself.
What is the reverse of an element list? The reverse of the second element followed by the first element.
def reverseRecursive( self, n ) :
if None != n:
right = n.getNext()
if self.head != n:
n.setNext(self.head)
self.head = n
else:
n.setNext(None)
self.reverseRecursive( right )
Time Complexity: O(). Space Complexity: O(), for recursive stack.
Problem-17 Suppose there are two singly linked lists both of which intersect at some point and become a
single linked list. The head or start pointers of both the lists are known, but the intersecting node is not
known. Also, the number of nodes in each of the lists before they intersect is unknown and may be different
in each list. 1 may have nodes before it reaches the intersection point, and 2 might have nodes
before it reaches the intersection point where and may be = , < or > . Give an algorithm for
finding the merging point.
NULL
Solution: Brute-Force Approach: One easy solution is to compare every node pointer in the first list with every
other node pointer in the second list by which the matching node pointers will lead us to the intersecting node.
But, the time complexity in this case will be O() which will be high.
Problem-18 Can we solve Problem-17 using the sorting technique?
Solution: No. Consider the following algorithm which is based on sorting and see why this algorithm fails.
Algorithm:
Take first list node pointers and keep them in some array and sort them.
Take second list node pointers and keep them in some array and sort them.
After sorting, use two indexes: one for the first sorted array and the other for the second sorted array.
Start comparing values at the indexes and increment the index according to whichever has the lower
value (increment only if the values are not equal).
At any point, if we are able to find two indexes whose values are the same, then that indicates that
those two nodes are pointing to the same node and we return that node.
Time Complexity: Time for sorting lists + Time for scanning (for comparing)
= O() +O() +O( + ) We need to consider the one that gives the maximum value.
Any problem with the above algorithm? Yes. In the algorithm, we are storing all the node pointers of both the
lists and sorting. But we are forgetting the fact that there can be many repeated elements. This is because after
the merging point, all node pointers are the same for both the lists. The algorithm works fine only in one case
and it is when both lists have the ending node at their merge point.
Problem-19 Can we solve Problem-17 using hash tables?
Solution: Yes.
Algorithm:
Select a list which has less number of nodes (If we do not know the lengths beforehand then select one
list randomly).
Now, traverse the other list and for each node pointer of this list check whether the same node pointer
exists in the hash table.
If there is a merge point for the given lists then we will definitely encounter the node pointer in the hash
table.
def findIntersectingNode( self, list1, list2 ):
intersect = {}
t = list1

while None != t:
intersect[t] = True
t = t.getNext()
# first duplicate is intersection
t = list2
while None != t:
if None != intersect.get( t ):
return t
t = t.getNext()
return None
Time Complexity: Time for creating the hash table + Time for scanning the second list = O() + O() (or O() +
O(), depending on which list we select for creating the hash table. But in both cases the time complexity is the
same.
Space Complexity: O() or O().
Problem-20 Can we use stacks for solving Problem-17?
Solution: Yes.
Algorithm:
Create two stacks: one for the first list and one for the second list.
Traverse the first list and push all the node addresses onto the first stack.
Traverse the second list and push all the node addresses onto the second stack.
Now both stacks contain the node address of the corresponding lists.
Now compare the top node address of both stacks.
If they are the same, take the top elements from both the stacks and keep them in some temporary
variable (since both node addresses are node, it is enough if we use one temporary variable).
Continue this process until the top node addresses of the stacks are not the same.
This point is the one where the lists merge into a single list.
Return the value of the temporary variable.
Time Complexity: O( + ), for scanning both the lists.
Space Complexity: O( + ), for creating two stacks for both the lists.
Problem-21 Is there any other way of solving Problem-17?
Solution: Yes. Using finding the first repeating number approach in an array (for algorithm refer
chapter).
Algorithm:
Create an array and keep all the next pointers of both the lists in the array.
In the array find the first repeating element [Refer to chapter for algorithm].
The first repeating number indicates the merging point of both the lists.
Time Complexity: O( + ). Space Complexity: O( + ).
Problem-22 Can we still think of finding an alternative solution for Problem-17?
Solution: Yes. By combining sorting and search techniques we can reduce the complexity.
Algorithm:
Create an array and keep all the next pointers of the first list in the array.
Sort these array elements.
Then, for each of the second list elements, search in the sorted array (let us assume that we are using
binary search which gives O()).
Since we are scanning the second list one by one, the first repeating element that appears in the array is
nothing but the merging point.
Time Complexity: Time for sorting + Time for searching = O((, )).
Space Complexity: O((, )).
Problem-23 Can we improve the complexity for Problem-17?
Solution: Yes.
Efficient Approach:
Find lengths (L1 and L2) of both lists -- O() + O() = O((, )).
Take the difference of the lengths -- O(1).
Make steps in longer list -- O().

Step in both lists in parallel until links to next node match -- O((, )).
Total time complexity = O((, )).
Space Complexity = O(1).
def getIntersectionNode(self, list1, list2):
currentList1,currentList2 = list1,list2
list1Len,list2Len = 0,0
while currentList1 is not None:
list1Len += 1
currentList1 = currentList1.next
while currentList2 is not None:
list2Len += 1
currentList1,currentList2 = list1,list2
if list1Len > list2Len:
for i in range(list1Len-list2Len):
elif list2Len > list1Len:
for i in range(list2Len-list1Len):
while currentList2 != currentList1:
return currentList1
Problem-24 How will you find the middle of the linked list?
Solution: Brute-Force Approach: For each of the node counts how many nodes are there in the list and see
whether it is the middle.
Time Complexity: O(2 ). Space Complexity: O(1).
Problem-25 Can we improve the complexity of Problem-24?
Solution: Yes.
Algorithm:
Traverse the list and find the length of the list.
After finding the length, again scan the list and locate /2 node from the beginning.
Time Complexity: Time for finding the length of the list + Time for locating middle node = O() + O() O().
Problem-26 Can we use the hash table for solving Problem-24?
Solution: Yes. The reasoning is the same as that of Problem-3.
Time Complexity: Time for creating the hash table. Therefore, () = O().
Space Complexity: O(). Since we need to create a hash table of size .
Problem-27 Can we solve Problem-24 just in one scan?
Solution: Efficient Approach: Use two pointers. Move one pointer at twice the speed of the second. When the
first pointer reaches the end of the list, the second pointer will be pointing to the middle node.
Note: If the list has an even number of nodes, the middle node will be of /2.
def findMiddleNode( self) :
fastPtr = self.head
slowPtr = self.head
while (fastPtr != None):
if (fastPtr == None):
return slowPtr
slowPtr = slowPtr.getNext()
return slowPtr

Problem-28 How will you display a linked list from the end?
Solution: Traverse recursively till the end of the linked list. While coming back, start printing the elements. It is
natural to express many list operations using recursive methods. For example, the following is a recursive
algorithm for printing a list backwards:
1. Separate the list into two pieces: the first node (called the head); and the rest (called the tail).
2. Print the tail backward.
3. Print the head.
Of course, Step 2, the recursive call, assumes that we have a way of printing a list backward.
def printListFromEnd( self, list) :
if list == None:
return
head = list
tail = list.getNext()
self.printListFromEnd(tail)
print head.getData(),
if __name__ == "__main__":
linkedlst = LinkedList()
linkedlst.insertAtEnd(1)
linkedlst.printList()
linkedlst.printListFromEnd(linkedlst.head)
Time Complexity: O(). Space Complexity: O() for Stack.
Problem-29 Check whether the given Linked List length is even or odd?
Solution: Use a 2 pointer. Take a pointer that moves at 2 [two nodes at a time]. At the end, if the length is
even, then the pointer will be NULL; otherwise it will point to the last node.
def isLinkedListLengthEven(self):
current = self.head
while current != None and current.getNext()!= None:
current = current.getNext().getNext()
if current == None:
return 1
return 0
Time Complexity: O(/2) O(). Space Complexity: O(1).
Problem-30 If the head of a linked list is pointing to element, then how will you get the elements before
element?
Solution: Use Memory Efficient Linked Lists [XOR Linked Lists].
Problem-31 Given two sorted Linked Lists, how to merge them into the third list in sorted order?
Solution: Assume the sizes of lists are and .
def mergeTwoLists(self, list1, list2):
temp = Node()
pointer = temp
while list1 !=None and list2 !=None:
if list1.getData()<list2.getData():
pointer.setNext(list1)
list1 = list1.getNext()
else:
pointer = pointer.getNext()
if list1 == None:
else:
return temp.getNext()
Time Complexity: O( + ), where and are lengths of two lists.

Problem-32 Reverse the linked list in pairs. If you have a linked list that holds 1 2 3 4 , then
after the function has been called the linked list would hold 2 1 4 3 .
Solution:
def reverseInPairs( self ) :
temp = self.head
while None != temp and None != temp.getNext():
self.swapData( temp, temp.getNext() )
temp = temp.getNext().getNext()
def swapData( self, a, b ):
tmp = a.getData()
a.setData(b.getData())
b.setData(tmp)
Time Complexity O(). Space Complexity: O(1).
Problem-33 Given a binary tree convert it to doubly linked list.
Solution: Refer chapter.
Problem-34 How do we sort the Linked Lists?
Solution: Refer chapter.
Problem-35 Split a Circular Linked List into two equal parts. If the number of nodes in the list are odd then
make first list one node extra than second list.
Solution:
Algorithm:
Store the mid and last pointers of the linked list using Floyd cycle finding algorithm.
Set head pointers of the two linked lists.
As an example, consider the following linked list.
4 15 7 40
Head
After the split, the above list will look like:
4 15 7 40
Head middle
def splitList(head):
fast = head
slow = head
while fast != None and fast.getNext() != None:
slow = slow.getNext()
fast = fast.getNext()
fast = fast.getNext()
middle = slow.getNext()
slow.setNext(None)
return head, middle
Problem-36 If we want to concatenate two linked lists, which of the following gives O(1) complexity?
1) Singly linked lists
2) Doubly linked lists
3) Circular doubly linked lists

Solution: Circular Doubly Linked Lists. This is because for singly and doubly linked lists, we need to traverse
the first list till the end and append the second list. But in the case of circular doubly linked lists we dont have
to traverse the lists.
Problem-37 How will you check if the linked list is palindrome or not?
Solution:
Algorithm:
1. Get the middle of the linked list.
2. Reverse the second half of the linked list.
3. Compare the first half and second half.
4. Construct the original linked list by reversing the second half again and attaching it back to the first
half.
Problem-38 For a given value ( > 0) reverse blocks of nodes in a list.
Example: Input: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. Output for different values:
For = 2: 2 1 4 3 6 5 8 7 10 9 For = 3: 3 2 1 6 5 4 9 8 7 10 For = 4: 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 9 10
Solution:
Algorithm: This is an extension of swapping nodes in a linked list.
1) Check if remaining list has nodes.
a. If yes get the pointer of + 1 node.
b. Else return.
2) Reverse first nodes.
3) Set next of last node (after reversal) to + 1 node.
4) Move to + 1 node.
5) Go to step 1.
6) 1 node of first nodes becomes the new head if available. Otherwise, we can return the head.
def reverseKBlock(self, head, k):
temp = Node(0);
temp.setNext(head)
previous = temp
while True:
begin = previous.getNext()
end = previous
for i in range(0,k):
end = end.getNext()
if end == None:
nextBlock = end.getNext()
self.reverseList(begin,end)
previous.setNext(end)
begin.setNext(nextBlock)
previous = begin
def reverseList(self, start, end):
alreadyReversed = start
actual = start
nextNode = start.getNext()
while actual != end:
actual = nextNode
nextNode = nextNode.getNext()
actual.setNext(alreadyReversed)
alreadyReversed = actual
Problem-39 Is it possible to get O(1) access time for Linked Lists?
Solution: Yes. Create a linked list and at the same time keep it in a hash table. For elements we have to keep
all the elements in a hash table which gives a preprocessing time of O(). To read any element we require only
constant time O(1) and to read elements we require 1 unit of time = units. Hence by using amortized
analysis we can say that element access can be performed within O(1) time.
Time Complexity O(1) [Amortized]. Space Complexity - O() for Hash Table.

Problem-40 Josephus Circle: Flavius Josephus was a famous Jewish historian of the first century, at the
time of the destruction of the Second Temple. According to legend, during the Jewish-Roman war he was
trapped in a cave with a group of forty soldiers surrounded by Romans. Preferring death to capture, the Jews
decided to form a circle and, proceeding around it, to kill every third person remaining until no one was left.
Josephus found the safe spot in the circle and thus stayed alive. Write a function josephus(n,m) that returns
a list of people, numbered from 0 to 1, in the order in which they are executed, every person in turn,
with the sole survivor as the last person in the list. That mean, find which person will be the last one
remaining (with rank 1).
Solution: Assume the input is a circular linked list with nodes and each node has a number (range 1 to )
associated with it. The head node has number 1 as data.
def getJosephusPosition(n, m):

class Node:
def __init__(self, data = None, next = None):
self.setData(data)
self.setNext(next)
self.data = data
def getData(self):
return self.data
self.next = next
def getNext(self):
return self.next
def hasNext(self):
answer = []
# initialize circular linked list
head = Node(0)
prev = head
for n in range(1, n):
currentNode = Node(n)
prev.setNext(currentNode)
prev = currentNode
prev.setNext(head) # set the last node to point to the front (circular list)
# extract items from linked list in proper order
currentNode = head
counter = 0
while currentNode.getNext() != currentNode:
counter += 1
if counter == m:
counter = 0
prev.setNext(currentNode.next)
answer.append(currentNode.getData())
else:
prev = currentNode
answer.append(currentNode.getData())
return answer
print str(getJosephusPosition(6, 3))
Problem-41 Given a linked list consists of data, a next pointer and also a random pointer which points to a
random node of the list. Give an algorithm for cloning the list.
Solution: We can use a hash table to associate newly created nodes with the instances of node in the given list.

Algorithm:
Scan the original list and for each node , create a new node with data of , then store the pair (, )
in hash table using as a key. Note that during this scan set and to and we
will fix them in the next scan.
Now for each node in the original list we have a copy stored in our hash table. We scan the original
list again and set the pointers building the new list.
class Node:
def __init__(self, data):
self.setData(data)
self.setNext(None)
self.setRand(None)
self.data = data
def getData(self):
return self.data
self.next = next
def setRand(self,rand):
self.rand = rand
def getRand(self):
return self.rand
def getNext(self):
return self.next
def hasNext(self):
def cloneLinkedList(old):
if not old:
return
old_copy = old
root = Node(old.getData())
prev = root
temp = None
old = old.getNext()
mapping = {}
while old:
temp = Node(old.getData())
mapping[old] = temp
prev.setNext(temp)
prev = temp
old = old.getNext()
old = old_copy
temp = root
while old:
temp.setRand(mapping[old.rand])
temp = temp.getNext()
old = old.getNext()
return root
Time Complexity: O(). Space Complexity: O().
Problem-42 Can we solve Problem-41 without any extra space?
Solution: Yes.

# Definition for singly-linked list with a random pointer.

class RandomListNode:
def __init__(self, data):
self.data = data
self.next = None
self.random = None
class Solution:
# @param head, a RandomListNode
# @return a RandomListNode
def copyRandomList(self, head):
if None == head:
return None
save_list = [ ]
p1 = head
while None != p1:
save_list.append(p1)
p1 = p1.next
new_head = RandomListNode(-1)
new_head.next = head
first = new_head
second = head
copyHead = RandomListNode(-1)
copyFirst = copyHead
copySecond = None
while None != first:
copySecond = RandomListNode(second.data) if None != second else None
copyFirst.next = copySecond
copyFirst = copyFirst.next
first = first.next
if None != second:
second = second.next
p1 = head
p1_tail = head.next
p2 = copyHead.next
while None != p1:
p1_tail = p1.next
p1.next = p2
p2.random = p1
p1 = p1_tail
p2 = p2.next
p2 = copyHead.next
while None != p2:
p2.random = p2.random.random.next if None != p2.random.random else None
p2 = p2.next
len_save_list = len(save_list)
for i in range(0, len_save_list - 1):
save_list[i].next = save_list[i + 1]
save_list[len_save_list - 1].next = None
return copyHead.next
Time Complexity: O(3) O(). Space Complexity: O(1).
Problem-43 Given a linked list with even and odd numbers, create an algorithm for making changes to the
list in such a way that all even numbers appear at the beginning.
Solution: To solve this problem, we can use the splitting logic. While traversing the list, split the linked list into
two: one contains all even nodes and the other contains all odd nodes. Now, to get the final list, we can simply
append the odd node linked list after the even node linked list.
To split the linked list, traverse the original linked list and move all odd nodes to a separate linked list of all odd
nodes. At the end of the loop, the original list will have all the even nodes and the odd node list will have all the
odd nodes. To keep the ordering of all nodes the same, we must insert all the odd nodes at the end of the odd
node list.


Problem-44 In a linked list with nodes, the time taken to insert an element after an element pointed by
some pointer is
(A) O(1) (B) O() (C) O() (D) O(1)
Solution: A.
Problem-45 Find modular node: Given a singly linked list, write a function to find the last element from the
beginning whose % == 0, where is the number of elements in the list and is an integer constant. For
example, if = 19 and = 3 then we should return 18 node.
Solution: For this problem the value of is not known in advance.
def modularNodeFromBegin(self, k):
modularNode = None
i=1
if k <= 0:
return None;
while currentNode != None:
if i%k == 0:
modularNode = currentNode
i=i+1
print ( modularNode.getData())
Problem-46 Find modular node from the end: Given a singly linked list, write a function to find the first
from the end whose % == 0, where is the number of elements in the list and is an integer constant.
If = 19 and = 3 then we should return 16 node.
Solution: For this problem the value of is not known in advance and it is the same as finding the element
from the end of the the linked list.
def modularNodeFromEnd(self, k):
modularNode = self.head
i=0
if k <= 0:
return None;
while i < k and currentNode != None:
i=i+1
return
modularNode = modularNode.getNext()
print (modularNode.getData())

Problem-47 Find fractional node: Given a singly linked list, write a function to find the element, where

is the number of elements in the list.
def fractionalNode(self, k):
fractionalNode = None
i=0
if k <= 0:
return None;
if i%k == 0:
if fractionalNode == None:
fractionalNode = self.head
else:
fractionalNode = fractionalNode.getNext()
i=i+1
print (fractionalNode.getData())

Problem-48 Find node: Given a singly linked list, write a function to find the element, where is
the number of elements in the list. Assume the value of is not known in advance.
def sqrtNthNodes(self):
sqrtNode = None
i=j=1
if i == j * j:
if sqrtNode == None:
sqrtNode = self.head
else:
sqrtNode = sqrtNode.getNext()
j=j+1
i=i+1
print (sqrtNode.getData())
Problem-49 Given two lists List1 = {1 , 2 , . . . , } and List2 = {1 , 2 , . . . , } with data (both lists) in
ascending order. Merge them into the third list in ascending order so that the merged list will be:
{1 , 1 , 2, 2 ..... , , +1 .... } if >=
{1 , 1 , 2, 2 ..... , , +1 .... } if >=
Solution:
def mergeTwoSortedLists(self, list1, list2):
temp = Node(0)
pointer = temp
while list1 !=None and list2 !=None:
if list1.getData()<list2.getData():
else:
pointer = pointer.getNext()
if list1 == None:
else:
Time Complexity: The loop takes O((, )) time as it will run for (, ) times. The other steps run in
O(1). Therefore the total time complexity is O((, )).
Problem-50 Median in an infinite series of integers
Solution: Median is the middle number in a sorted list of numbers (if we have an odd number of elements). If we
have an even number of elements, the median is the average of two middle numbers in a sorted list of numbers.
We can solve this problem with linked lists (with both sorted and unsorted linked lists).

, let us try with an linked list. In an unsorted linked list, we can insert the element either at the
head or at the tail. The disadvantage with this approach is that finding the median takes O(). Also, the
insertion operation takes O(1).
Now, let us try with a linked list. We can find the median in O(1) time if we keep track of the middle
elements. Insertion to a particular location is also O(1) in any linked list. But, finding the right location to insert
is not O() as in a sorted array, it is instead O() because we cant perform binary search in a linked list even
if it is sorted.
So, using a sorted linked list isnt worth the effort as insertion is O() and finding median is O(1), the same as
the sorted array. In the sorted array the insertion is linear due to shifting, but here its linear because we cant
do a binary search in a linked list.
Note: For an efficient algorithm refer to the chapter.
Problem-51 Given a linked list, how do you modify it such that all the even numbers appear before all the
odd numbers in the modified linked list?
Solution:
def exchangeEvenOddList(head):
# initializing the odd and even list headers
oddList = evenList =None
# creating tail variables for both the list
oddListEnd = evenListEnd = None
itr=head
if( head == None ):
return
else:
while( itr != None ):
if( itr.data % 2 == 0 ):
if( evenList == NULL ):
# first even node
evenList = evenListEnd = itr
else:
# inserting the node at the end of linked list
evenListEnd.next = itr
evenListEnd = itr
else:
if( oddList == NULL ):
# first odd node
oddList = oddListEnd = itr
else:
# inserting the node at the end of linked list
oddListEnd.next = itr
oddListEnd = itr
itr = itr.next
evenListEnd.next = oddList
return head
Problem-52 Given two linked lists, each list node with one integer digit, add these two linked lists. The
result should be stored in the third linked list. Also note that the head node contains the most significant
digit of the number.
Solution: Since the integer addition starts from the least significant digit, we first need to visit the last node of
both lists and add them up, create a new node to store the result, take care of the carry if any, and link the
resulting node to the node which will be added to the second least significant node and continue.
First of all, we need to take into account the difference in the number of digits in the two numbers. So before
starting recursion, we need to do some calculation and move the longer list pointer to the appropriate place so
that we need the last node of both lists at the same time. The other thing we need to take care of is . If two
digits add up to more than 10, we need to forward the to the next node and add it. If the most significant
digit addition results in a , we need to create an extra node to store the carry.

The function below is actually a wrapper function which does all the housekeeping like calculating lengths of
lists, calling recursive implementation, creating an extra node for the in the most significant digit, and
adding any remaining nodes left in the longer list.
class AddingListNumbers:
def addTwoNumbers(self, list1, list2):
if list1 == None:
return list2
if list2 == None:
return list1
len1 = len2 = 0
head = list1
while head != None:
len1 += 1
head = head.next
head = list2
while head != None:
len2 += 1
head = head.next
if len1 >= len2:
longer = list1
shorter = list2
else:
longer = list2;
shorter = list1
sum = None
carry = 0
while shorter != None:
value = longer.data + shorter.data + carry
carry = value / 10
value -= carry * 10
if sum == None:
sum = Node(value)
result = sum
else:
sum.next = Node(value)
sum = sum.next
longer = longer.next
shorter = shorter.next
while longer != None:
value = longer.data + carry
carry = value / 10
value -= carry * 10
sum.next = Node(value)
sum = sum.next
longer = longer.next
if carry != 0:
sum.next = Node(carry)
return result
Time Complexity: O( (1 , 2 )).
Space Complexity: O((1 , 2 )) for recursive stack.
Note:It can also be solved using stacks.
Problem-53 Write code for finding the sum of all data values from linked list with recursion.
Solution: One of the basic operations we perform on linked lists (as we do with lists) is to iterate over them,
processing alst their values. The following function computes the sum of the values in a linked list.
def linkedListSum(lst):
sum = 0
while lst != None:

sum += lst.
lst = lst.getNext()
return sum
Lots of code that traverses (iterates over) linked lists looks similar. In class we will go over (hand simulate) how
this code processes the linked list above, with the call (x) and see exactly how it is that we visit
each node in the linked list and stop processing it at the end.
We can also define linked lists recursively and use such a definition to help us write functions that recursively
process linked lists.
1) None is the smallest linked list: it contains no nodes
2) A list node whose next refers to a linked list is also linked list
So None is a linked list (of 0 values); a list node whose next is is a linked list (of 1 value); a list node whose
next is a list node whose next is is a linked list (of 2 values); etc.
So, we can recursively process a linked list by processing its first node and then recursively processing the (one
smaller) linked list they refer to; recursion ends at None (which is the base case: the smallest linked list). We can
recursively compute the sum of linked list by
def linkedListSum(self, lst):
if lst == None:
return 0
else:
return lst.getData() + linkedListSum(lst.getNext())
An even simpler traversal of linked lists computes their length. Here are the iterative and recursive methods.
def listLength(lst):
count = 0
while lst != None:
count += 1
lst = lst.getNext()
return count
def listLengthRecursive(lst):
if lst == None:
return 0
else:
return 1 + listLengthRecursive(lst.getNext())
These are simpler than the function: rather than adding the value of each list node, these add 1 to
a count for each list node, ultimately computing the number of list nodes in the entire linked list: its length.
Problem-54 Given a sorted linked list, write a program to remove duplicates from it.
Solution: Skip the repeated adjacent elements.
def deleteLinkedListDuplicates(self):
current = self.head;
while current != None and current.next !=None:
if current.getData() == current.getNext().getData():
current.setNext(current.getNext().getNext())
else:
return head
Problem-55 Given a list, List1 = {1 , 2 , . . . 1 , } with data, reorder it to {1 , , 2, 1 ..... } without
using any extra space.
Solution: Split the list, reverse the latter half and merge.
# Definition for singly-linked list.
class Node:
def __init__(self, x):
self.data = x
self.next = None
class reorderLists:
def reverse(self,head):
dummy = prev = Node(0)
while head:

next = head.next
head.next = prev.next
prev.next =head
head = next
return dummy.next
def getMiddleNode(self,head):
slow = fast = head
while fast.next and fast.next.next:
slow = slow.next
head = slow.next
slow.next = None
return head
def reorderList(self, head):
if not head or not head.next:
return head
head2 = self.getMiddleNode(head)
head2 = self.reverse(head2)
p = head
q= head2
while q:
qnext = q.next # store the next node since q will be moved
q.next = p.next
p.next = q
p = q.next
q = qnext
return head
Problem-56 Which sorting algorithm is easily adaptable to singly linked lists?
Solution: Simple Insertion sort is easily adabtable to singly linked lists. To insert an element, the linked list is
traversed until the proper position is found, or until the end of the list is reached. It is inserted into the list by
merely adjusting the pointers without shifting any elements, unlike in the array. This reduces the time required
for insertion but not the time required for searching for the proper position.

Sample Linked Lists Chapter (Data Structure and Algorithmic Thinking With Python)

Uploaded by

Sample Linked Lists Chapter (Data Structure and Algorithmic Thinking With Python)

Uploaded by

Data Structure and Algorithmic Thinking with Python Linked Lists

3.2 Linked Lists ADT

3.3 Why Linked Lists?

3.4 Arrays Overview

3.1 What is a Linked List? 48

Why Constant Time for Accessing Array Elements?

Advantages of Linked Lists

Issues with Linked Lists (Disadvantages)

3.4 Arrays Overview 49

3.5 Comparison of Linked Lists with Arrays and Dynamic Arrays

3.6 Singly Linked Lists

Basic Operations on a List

Traversing the Linked List

3.5 Comparison of Linked Lists with Arrays and Dynamic Arrays 50

Singly Linked List Insertion

Inserting a Node in Singly Linked List at the Beginning

3.6 Singly Linked Lists 51

Inserting a Node in Singly Linked List at the Ending

Last nodes next pointer points to the new node.

#method for inserting a new node at the end of a Linked List

Inserting a Node in Singly Linked List at the Middle

Position nodes next pointer now points to the new node.

3.6 Singly Linked Lists 52

Singly Linked List Deletion

Deleting the First Node in Singly Linked List

3.6 Singly Linked Lists 53

Deleting the Last Node in Singly Linked List

Node previous to tail Tail

Node previous to tail Tail

Dispose of the tail node.

Node previous to tail Tail

#Method to delete the last node of the linked list

3.6 Singly Linked Lists 54

Deleting an Intermediate Node in Singly Linked List

Head Previous node Node to be deleted

Dispose of the current node to be deleted.

Head Previous node Node to be deleted

3.6 Singly Linked Lists 55

Deleting Singly Linked List

Time Complexity: O(1). Space Complexity: O(1)

3.7 Doubly Linked Lists

3.7 Doubly Linked Lists 56

return self.next != None

Doubly Linked List Insertion

Inserting a Node in Doubly Linked List at the Beginning

def insertAtBeginning(self, data):

Inserting a Node in Doubly Linked List at the Ending

3.7 Doubly Linked Lists 57

Head List end node New node

NULL NULL NULL

Update right pointer of last node to point to new node.

Head List end node New node

Inserting a Node in Doubly Linked List at the Middle

NULL Position node

3.7 Doubly Linked Lists 58

def getNode(self, index):

Doubly Linked List Deletion

Deleting the First Node in Doubly Linked List

3.7 Doubly Linked Lists 59

Deleting the Last Node in Doubly Linked List

Previous node to Tail Tail

Previous node to Tail Tail

Dispose of the tail node.

Previous node to Tail Tail

Deleting an Intermediate Node in Doubly Linked List

Head Previous node Node to be deleted

Dispose of the current node to be deleted.

3.7 Doubly Linked Lists 60

Head Previous node Node to be deleted

#Deleting element at given position

3.8 Circular Linked Lists

3.8 Circular Linked Lists 61

Counting Nodes in a Circular List

Printing the Contents of a Circular List

3.8 Circular Linked Lists 62

Inserting a Node at the End of a Circular Linked List