Deterministic Finite Automata (DFSA) : Often Representing As A Diagram
Deterministic Finite Automata (DFSA) : Often Representing As A Diagram
DFA
Often representing as a diagram:
DFA
Often representing as a diagram:
DFA Minimization
Some states can be redundant:
The following DFA accepts (a|b)+
State s1 is not necessary
DFA Minimization
This is a state-minimized (or just minimized)
DFA
Every remaining state is necessary
DFA Minimization
The task of DFA minimization, then, is to
automatically transform a given DFA into a
state-minimized DFA
Several algorithms and variants are known
Note that this also in effect can minimize an NFA
(since we know algorithm to convert NFA to DFA)
s0
s1
s2
s0 s1 s2
s0
s1 ε
s2 ε
s0 s1 s2
Label pairs with ε where one is a final state and the other is not
Finite Automata
Minimization of DFA
One important result on finite automata, both theoretically and practically, is that for any regular
language there is a unique DFA having the smallest number of states that accepts it. Let M = < Q
, , q0 , , A > be a DFA that accepts a language L. Then the following algorithm produces the
DFA, denote it by M1, that has the smallest number of states amomg the DFAs that accept L.
while ( new )
:= new ;
new := new_partition( )
final := ;
function new_partition( )
for each set S of do
partition S into subsets such that two states p and q of S are in the same subset of S
if and only if for each input symbol, p and q make a transition to (states of) the same set of
.
The subsets thus formed are sets of the output partition in place of S.
If S is not partitioned in this process, S remains in the output partition.
end
Select one state in each set of the partition final as the representative for the set. These
representatives are states of minimum DFA M1.
Let p and q be representatives i.e. states of minimum DFA M1. Let us also denote by p
and q the sets of states of the original DFA M represented by p and q, respectively. Let s
be a state in p and t a state in q. If a transition from s to t on symbol a exists in M, then
the minimum DFA M1 has a transition from p to q on symbol a.
The start state of M1 is the representative which contains the start state of M.
The accepting states of M1 are representatives that are in A.
Note that the sets of final are either a subset of A or disjoint from A.
Remove from M1 the dead states and the states not reachable from the start state, if there are any.
Any transitions to a dead state become undefined.
A state is a dead state if it is not an accepting state and has no out-going transitions except to
itself.
Example 1 :
Let us try to minimize the number of states of the following DFA.
Initially = { { 1 , 5 } , { 2 , 3 , 4 } }.
new_partition is applied to .
Since on b state 2 goes to state 1, state 3 goes to state 4 and 1 and 4 are in different sets in ,
states 2 and 3 are going to be separated from each other in new .
Also since on a sate 4 goes to sate 4, state 3 goes to state 5 and 4 and 5 are in different sets in ,
states 3 and 4 are going to be separated from each other in new.
Further, since on b 2 goes to 1, 4 goes to 4 and 1 and 4 are in different sets in , 2 and 4 are
separated from each other in new.
On the other hand 1 and 5 make the same transitions. So they are not going to be split.
When new_partition is applied to this new , since 1 and 5 do the same transitions, remains
unchanged.
Thus final = { { 1 , 5 } , { 2 } , { 3 } , { 4 ] }.
Select 1 as the representative for { 1 , 5 }. Since the rest are singletons, they have the obvious
representatives.
Note here that state 4 is a dead state because the only transitionout of it is to itself.
Thus the set of states for the minimized DFA is { 1 , 2 , 3 }.
For the transitions, since 1 goes to 3 on a, and to 2 on b in the original DFA, in the minimized
DFA transitions are added from 1 to 3 on a, and 1 to 2 on b. Also since 2 goes to 1 on b, and 3
goes to 1 on a in the original DFA, in the minimized DFA transitions are added from 2 to 1 on b,
and from 3 to 1 on a.
Since the rest of the states are singletons, all transitions between them are inherited for the
minimized DFA.
Example 2 :
Let us try to minimize the number of states of the following DFA.
Initially = { { 3 } , { 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 } }.
By applying new_partition to this , new = { { 3 } , { 1 , 4 , 5 } , { 2 , 6 } } is obtained.
Applyting new_partition to this , new = { { 3 } , { 1 , 4 } , { 5 } , { 2 } , { 6 } } is obtained.
Applyting new_partition again, new = { { 1 } , { 2 } , { 3 } , { 4 } , { 5 } , { 6 } } is obtained.
Thus the number of states of the given DFA is already minimum and it can not be reduced any
further.
Indicate which of the following statements are correct and which are not.
Click True or Fals , then Submit.
Next -- Application of FA