2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT)

Modelling and Control of Ball and Beam

System using PID Controller
1
P.V. Mani Maalini, 2G.Prabhakar, 3S.Selvaperumal
1
PG scholar, 2Assistant Professor, 3Professor,
1,2,3
Department of Electrical and Electronics engineering,
Syed Ammal Engineering College,
Ramanathapuram, India.
1
maalinidhanam@gmail.com, 2gprabhakar2488@gmail.com, 3perumal.om@gmail.com

Abstract: The ball and beam is a basic reference point the ball role along the beam and also finds position and
system with high nonlinearity and unstable system in its locates one side of the beam. An actuator acquires the
dynamics. Many simple and present day control methods beam at a desired angle, by sending a torque at the end
have been used to balance the ball and beam system. The of the beam.
goal of this project is to model and control the ball and
beam system. Here considering the beam angle of servo
motor and designing controllers to control the ball
position. Lagrange approach is used to find the ball
position of the system. It is based on energy balance of the
system. Based on the transfer function and state space
model, open loop system and closed loop system are
designed. The system is designed by using two Degrees-of-
Freedom. The nonlinear characteristic of the second order
system is regulated by using PID controller. The controller
controls the ball position in moving the beam using the
motor and beaten the disturbances. The parameters of the
PID are tuned using PID tuning Algorithm. In order to
analyse the accomplishment of PID to learn the effect of
simplifying expectation, two control methods are designed
and implemented using Proportional Derivative Integral
(PID) as non-model based control method, Proportional
Derivative and Proportional integral combination of model
based and non-model based control methods.

Keywords- PI control; PD control; PID control.

I.INTRODUCTION x (mb) mass of the ball

x (Rb) radius of the ball
The ball and beam system is one of the most prominent x (d) lever arm offset
and crucial reference point systems. The ball and beam x (g) gravitational acceleration
system is an ambiguous fundamental system. Adaptive x (LB) length of the beam
dynamic surface controller is used to achieve the ball x (Jb) ball's moment of inertia
positioning. Most contemporary and current methods x (rb) ball position coordinate
have been used to balance the ball and beam system [1]- x (_1) beam angle coordinate
[2]. The design of a fuzzy logic controller for the ball x ( _2 ) servo gear angle
and beam system using a modified Ant Colony
Optimization (ACO) method is used to optimize the The ball position is balanced by the controller in
type of membership functions, the membership function moving the beam using the motor and also beaten the
parameters and the fuzzy rules [3]. The hierarchical fair disruption. The ball position can be changed without
competition-based genetic algorithm (HFCGA) is to ceiling for beam angle fixed input. This property has
introduce the fuzzy cascade controller scheme which made system. A convenient device is used to test
consists of the outer controller and the inner controller contrasting control approaches. The ball and beam
in a cascaded architecture [4]. The tracking and almost system contain two Degrees-of-Freedom (DOFs). The
disturbance decoupling problem of nonlinear AMIRAs ball is simulated to have rotary movement of inertia
ball and beam system based on the feedback friction during moving on the beam. However, some of
linearization approach and fuzzy logic control [5]. The the properties were erased in the most research work
State Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) technique for concerning the balland beam mechanism in order to
a ball and beam system, which is inherently nonlinear simplify the dynamic equation of the system. The ball
and unstable system [6]. In this paper, the sensor finds and beam system is popular and valuable laboratory

ISBN No.978-1-4673-9545-8 322

 2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT)

models for teaching control systems. However, the behaviour of the system is sensed and then feed back to
motion of the ball and the motor angle communicate in the controller and mixed with the citation or desired
the real system. The ball has a poor value during the state of the system to modify the system to its desired
slow movement of the angular velocity of the beam. state. The goal of the control system is to estimate
Therefore, this specification was neglected in modeling solutions for the proper corrective action to the system
of the ball and beam system. so that it can hold the set point (reference) and not
fluctuate around it.
However, when the ball is away from the familiar
point, the beam should rotate with noticeable velocity in
association to the alternative parameters. In addition, the II. MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
carioles acceleration term straightly relates to the beam
angle. In order to acquire ball and beam system
dynamic equation, Lagrange approach is used to find
Due to the complexity and the nonlinearity of the the ball position of the system. It is based on energy
administrative dynamics, some research workers used balance of the system. The Lagrange approach is used to
non-model based control strategies such as Fuzzy Logic, acquire the motion equations for the ball and beam
Neural Network and PID to command the ball position system. The ball and beam system is the greatest model
and beam angle. The non-model based approach does based research work.
not require mathematical operation to acquire the
dynamic equations and to employ linearization. The mechanism of the ball and beam system
However, these approaches are mainly knowledge- contains two DOFs. Initially the Euler-Lagrange
based and cannot guarantee the stability of the system, equation is used to define the kinetic energy (1) and
which May aspect challenge to control the unstable ball potential energy (2) for the system.
and beam system. 1 1 r' 1 1
K mB r '2  J B ( )2  ( J B  mB r '2 )D '2  J bD '2 (1)
The current research has focus on three main 2 2 Rb 2 2
issues: comparing the performances of model based and 1
non-model based control strategies, learning the P mb g sin D  mB gr sin D (2)
coupling effect in the dynamic equations and designing 2
an optimal control approach seeing the system dynamic The parameters m is ball mass, m is beam
B b
requirements (i.e. the moment of inertia of the beam and mass, J is the beam moment of inertia and R is radius of
ball, and beam angular velocity). the ball, and also g is the gravity acceleration and l is
the length of the beam; variable is the linear movement
Model-Based Design (MBD) is a mathematical and
of the ball and beam and another variable is beam
visual method of addressing problems it combines with
angle.
creating complex control, communication systems and
signal processing. It is used in different movement The Lagrange function is the dissimilarity between
controls, aerospace, industrial equipment and kinetic energy and potential energy, which is defined by
automotive applications. Model-based design is a L equation,
technique applied in designing embedded software.
 (3)
Then an Open-loop system, also reference to as
without feedback system, is a type of continuous control The dynamic equation (4) representing the
system in which the output has no power or effect on variation effect of system variable. Equation (4),
the control action of the input signal. In other words, in equation (5) and (6) show the dynamic equation for two
an open-loop control system the output is neither DOFs of the ball and beam system.
calculated nor fed back for comparison with the input. J
Therefore, an open-loop system is predictable to firmly 0 ( 2
 mb )rbcc  mb g sin D  mb rbD ' 2 (4)
follow its input command or set point indifferent of the Rb
final result. In an open-loop system, it has no
information of the output condition so it cannot rectify d wL wL
any errors it could make when the present value drifts, ( ) Q (5)
dt wq ' wq
even if this results in large deviations from the present
value. Another drawback of open-loop systems is that
they are poorly equipped to handle disturbances or J
changes in the conditions which may decrease its ( 2
 mb )rbcc mb gD (6)
perform to complete the desired task. Rb
where is the torque produced by the motor
Closed loop control systems are those that applied on the end of the beam.
supply the feedback of the actual state of the system and d
compare it to the desired state of the system in order to D T (7)
L
change the system. It supplies the desired output. The J d
closed loop control system is a system where the actual ( 2
 mb )r cc mb g (T ) (8)
Rb LB

323
 2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT)

By taking the Laplace transform of the

previous equation, now we get the following equation is
J d
( 2
 mb ) R( s) s 2 mb g (T ( s)) (9)
Rb LB
Rearranging the equation (9), we can find the
transfer function from the gear angleto the ball
position
d J
P( S ) mb g ( 2  mb ) / s 2 (10)
LB Rb Figure 3.2 Simulink of Sub System
This is the final open loop system function of
ball and beam system. The reference point ball and
beam system set up consists of a long. A servo motor is
attached to the other end of the beam. The ball is
moving placed on the long beam.

III.SIMULATION RESULT

In this project, open loop system and closed

loop system are present. In the open loop system, the
output response is not controllable. After that, the closed
loop system of PID controller is modelled then tuning
the PID controller for getting the controlled output
response.

A. OPEN LOOP SYSTEM Figure 3.3 Response of open loop system

This diagram represents full view of the Simulink Ball and Beam is modelled by calculating mathematical
model of open loop system for ball and beam. Ball and modelling which is implemented by matlab Simulink.
Beam is modelled by calculating mathematical The step input value 5 is given to the summer then to
modelling which is implemented by MATLAB get the output of transfer function. Summer send to the
Simulink. In the Ball and Beam Open Loop System, the proportional Integral controller which is to eliminate
step input value is 5 and the system has Lagrange steady state error but yield the poor transient response.
function. The transfer function has the Lagrange equation. The
proportional controller response does not reach the
target for that reason we go to the PI controller.

Figure 3.1 Simulink Diagram of Open Loop System

This is the subsystem of Ball and Beam, It consist of Figure 3.4 Closed Loop Systems with PI Controller
Multiplexer, Integrator and derivative function.
Multiplexer add multiple inputs and provide single This diagram represents full view of the Simulink model
output. The ball and beam Lagrange function have the of closed loop system for Ball and Beam. Ball and
equation of transfer function. Beam is modelled by calculating mathematical
modelling which is implemented by matlab Simulink.
B. CLOSED LOOP SYSTEM The step input value 5 is given to the summer then to
get the output of transfer function. Summer send to the
This diagram represents full view of the Simulink model proportional Derivative controller which is provide the
of closed loop system for Ball and Beam. good system stability and transient response. It reduces
the overshoot.

324
 2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT)

The step input value 5 is given to the summer then to

get the output of transfer function. Summer send to the
proportional Derivative controller which is provide the
good system stability and transient response. It reduces
the overshoot.

2
Figure 3.5 Responses with PI Controller
1

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Figure 3.9 Responses with PID Controller

This diagram represents full view of the Simulink model

of closed loop system for Ball and Beam. Ball and
Figure 3.6 Closed Loop Systems with PD Controller Beam is modelled by calculating mathematical
modelling which is implemented by matlab Simulink.
The step input value 5 is given to the summer then to
get the output of transfer function. Summer send to the
PID controller which is provide the good system
stability and transient response. It decreases the
overshoot. The transfer function output and disturbance
signal added and send to the scope.

Figure 3.7 Responses with PD Controller Figure 3.10 PID Controller with Disturbance

This diagram represents full view of the Simulink model 6

of closed loop system for Ball and Beam. Ball and
Beam is modelled by calculating mathematical 5

modelling which is implemented by matlab Simulink.

4

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Figure 3.8 Closed Loop Systems with PID Controller Figure 3.11 Regulator response of PID Controller

325
 2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT)

IV.CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK

Thus the project is to model and control the

ball and beam system by considering the beam angle
of servo motor and designing controllers to control
the ball position. Then find the ball position of the
system using Lagrange method. Based on the transfer
function and state space model, open loop system
and closed loop system are designed. The nonlinear
behaviour of the second order system is controlled
using PID controller. The parameters of the PID are
tuned using PID tuning Algorithm. In order to
analyse the accomplishment of PID and learn the
effect of simplifying expectation. Two control
methods are designed and implemented using
Proportional Derivative Integral (PID) as non-model
based control method, Proportional Derivative and
Proportional integral combination of model based
and non-model based control methods.

The closed loop performance of the ball and

beam system will be analysed using fuzzy logic and
also the entire system will be implemented as
hardware prototype. Then the comparison will be
made between the hardware and software results.

REFERENCES

[1] Yeong-Hwa Chang, (2013) T-S Fuzzy Model-Based

Adaptive Dynamic SurfaceControl for Ball and Beam
System , IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol.
60, No. 6. pp.168-180.
[2] Jin-Shiuh Taur, Chia-Wen Chang , Chin-Wang Tao , Hung-
Wei Lin , Jin-Shiuh Taur and Yeong-Hwa Chang, (2012)
Fuzzy sliding-mode control for ball and beam system with
fuzzy ant colony optimization Expert Systems with
Applications Vol.39, No. 9, pp. 36243633.
[3] Oscar Castillo , Evelia Lizarraga , Patricia Melin and Fevrier
Valdez, (2015) New approach using ant colony
optimization with ant set partition for fuzzy control design
applied to the ball and beam system Information Sciences,
Vol.294, No. 4, pp. 203215.
[4] Sung-Kwun Oha, Han-JongJang and WitoldPedrycz , (2009)
The design of a fuzzy cascade controller for ball and beam
system: A study in optimization with the use of parallel
genetic algorithms Engineering Applications of Artificial
Intelligence, Vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 261271.
[5] Ting-Li Chien , Chung-Cheng Chen , Ming-Chun Tsai and
Ying-Chen Chen , (2010) Control of AMIRAs ball and
beam system via improved fuzzy feedback linearization
approach Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 34, No.6,
pp. 379389.
[6] Cloutier J R and Stanspery D T, (2002), The Capabilities
and art of state dependant Riccati equation based design In
proceeding of the American control conference,Vol.180,
No.3, pp. 86-91.

326