Acetabular Fracture
Acetabular Fracture
Chairman: Dr D R Kale
Presenter: Dr Sidharth Baheti
Introduction
• Pelvic fractures are potentially life threatening
injuries with an increased incidence due to
high velocity RTAs.
- Earle's sign:
- a bony prominence or large hematoma
as well as tenderness on rectal examination;
Moral Lavale Lesion
Destot Sign
Palpation
• Post---Haematoma/defect---SIJ or post #
• ASIS: Pushed towards- IR stability, Apart- ER
stabiity
• Lower extremity pushed for vertical stability
Imaging Pelvic Fractures
• Plain Radiographs- AP view
Imaging Pelvic Fractures
• Plain Radiographs- AP view
Pubic Rami #
Symphyseal Displacement
SIJ and Sacrum
Illiac #
L5 transverse process
Asso acet/proximal femur
2. Plain Radiographs- Inlet view
Anterior/posterior Displacement
of Sacrum, SIJ, Illium, symphysis
Rotational deformities of illium
Impacted sacral fractures
3. Plain Radiography Outlet view
CT scan
Gold standard for pelvic fractures. Detailed
information about anterior and posterior ring
MRI
Limited role.
GU and Vascular structures
CLASSIFICATION of pelvic fractures
Young and Burgess Classification
Most common classification used
Based on the mechanism of injury
Tile/AO Classification
Tile/AO Classification
Type A: STABLE
Tile/AO Classification
Type B: Rotationally unstable, Vertically
stable
Tile/AO Classification
Type C: Rotation and vertically
unstable
Sacral Fracture-Denis Classification
Miscellaneous Fractures
MALGAIGNE’s # STRADDLE #
Principles of Initial Management
• Suspect if high velocity RTA(car vs pedestrian;
Motorcycle) or a fall from height(usually
>15feet)
• Pelvis has no inherent stability and relies on
ligamentous supports.
• Vascular structures are intimately associated
with ligaments and are often injured.
German registry
reported a drop
in mortality from
11% to 6% after a
protocol was
established.
Circumferential Pelvic wrapping
• First patient; teague 1993,CA
• CORR 1995
• ATLS provider manual in 1997
• Can be done with a bedsheet or a Pelvic
binder.
• Where to wrap??
At the level of the Greater Trochanters
• Contraindications
– ilium fracture that precludes safe application
– acetabular fracture
Technique
– theoretically works by decreasing pelvic volume
– stability of bleeding bone surfaces and venous
plexus in order to form clot
– pins inserted into ilium
• single pin in column of supracetabular bone from AIIS
towards PSIS
– obturator outlet or "teepee" view to visualize this column of
bone
– AIIS pins can place the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve at risk
• multiple half pins in the superior iliac crest
– place in thickest portion of anterior ilium, gluteus medius
tubercle or gluteal pillar
– should be placed before emergent laparotomy
Angiography / Embolization
• Indications
– controversial and based on multiple variables
including:
– protocol of institution, stability of patient,
proximity of angiography suite , availability and
experience of staff
– CT angiography useful for determining presence or
absence of ongoing arterial hemorrhage (98-100%
negative predictive value)
Non-Operative Management
• Lateral impaction type injuries with minimal
(< 1.5 cm) displacement
• Pubic rami fractures with no posterior
displacement
• Minimal gapping of pubic symphysis
– Without associated SI injury
– 2.5 cm or less, assuming no motion with stress or
mobilization
– This number is not absolute, so other evidence of
instability (like SI injury) must be ruled out
Non-Operative Management
• X-rays are static picture of dynamic situation
– It may be that the deformity is worse than seen on
X-rays taken
– Stress radiographs may be helpful
– Other evidence of instability should be sought
• Lumbar transverse process fractures
• Avulsions of sacrotuberous/sacrospinous ligaments
Non-Operative Treatment
• Tile A (stable) injuries can generally bear
weight as tolerated
• Walker/crutches/cane often helpful in early
mobilization
• Serial radiographs followed during healing
• Displacement requires reassessment of
stability and consideration given to operative
treatment
Non-Operative Treatment
• Tile B (partially stable) injuries can be treated
non-operatively if deformity is minimal
• Weight bearing should be restricted (toe-
touch only) on side of posterior ring injury
• Serial radiographs followed during healing
• Displacement requires reassessment of
stability and consideration given to operative
treatment
Principles of Operative Treatment
• Posterior ring structure is important
Plate fixation
Spinal-Pelvic fixation
• Anterior column
fracture displacements
• Posterior wall
fragments and their
displacement
Plain Radiographs
3 - The iliac oblique view
• Posterior column #
• Anterior wall #
CT Scan
• 3 mm interval axial cuts
• Include the entire pelvis to
avoid missing a portion of
the fracture
• Compare with opposite hip
Watch for
Anterior and posterior wall fragments, marginal
impaction, retained bone fragments in the joint,
comminution, presence or absence of a dislocations
and any sacroiliac joint pathology.
Management
• Initial treatment – follow ATLS protocols
• Operative treatment of acetabular fractures
are usually not performed as an emergency
• Normally, a closed reduction Skeletal
traction
Operative Surgical anatomy
• Posterior wall fragments
– vary in the size and degree of comminution
– Well appreciated in a CT scan.
– Unrecognized fracture lines maybe detected at
surgery
– So the posterior wall fracture should never be
fixed with lag screw alone.
– The posterior wall fragment receives its blood
supply from the capsule avoid detaching the
capsule from its blood supply.
Operative Surgical anatomy
• Posterior Column fractures
– Can occur anywhere along the posterior column
from the ischial spine to the sciatic notch.
– Typically, the column fragment rotates.
– It is necessary to derotate the fragment and check
the reduction.
Operative Surgical anatomy
• Anterior Column fractures
– Occur at various levels along the anterior column.
– Although the pubic ramus is part of the anterior
column, ramus fracture usually indicates the
presence of a pelvic fracture rather than an
acetabular fracture.
Operative Surgical anatomy
• Transverse fractures
– Run across the acetabulum.
– transtectal: fracture courses through the weight-bearing
dome (WBD);
– juxtatectal: fracture courses above the cotyloid fossa, so
that a significant portion of the wt bearing dome is left
intact;
– infratectal: fracture courses below the wt bearing dome.
• T-type fractures
– Transverse fracture with a fracture line seperating the
anterior column from the posterior column
Operative Surgical anatomy
• Anterior and posterior hemi-transverse
fractures
– This is an anterior column fracture with and
additional fracture line that runs transversely
across the posterior column.
– Here, the displacement is usually anterior and the
posterior column not significantly disturbed.
– Thus reducing the anterior column usually reduces
the posterior column.
Operative Surgical anatomy
• Both column fractures
– Entire acetabulum is separated from the axial skeleton.
– Sometimes, it is called as a floating acetabulum.
– Since the entire acetabulum is separated from the ilium,
the actual joint can appear congruent.
– This radiographic appearance is called the secondary
congruence.
– Spur sign
Spur sign
• Pathognomonic of both
column fratures. see in
obturator oblique view
Surgical Approaches
• Iliofemoral
• Ilioinguinal
• Kocher Langenbeck
• Triradiate transtrochanteric
• Extended iliofemoral
• Combined anterior and posterior approach
Kocher – Langenbeck approach
• The Kocher-Langenbeck
approach is a
nonextensile approach to
the posterior acetabular
column
Outline all bony landmarks
with a sterile marking pen:
(1) posterior superior iliac
spine
(2) greater trochanter
(3) shaft of femur