Lab Report
Lab Report
EXPERIMENT NAME:
RESIDENCE TIME DISTRIBUTION MEASURMENT IN CONTNOUS STIRRED
TANK RECATOR
2) THEORY:
The time the atoms have spent in the reactor is called the residence time and
the distribution of the various atoms coming out the reactor with respect to
time is called the residence time distribution. RTD can be determined
experimentally by injecting an inert chemical, molecule, or atom, called tracer,
into the reactor at some time t=0 and then measuring the tracer concentration
‘C’ in the exit stream as a function of time. Pulse and step inputs are the two
commonly used methods of injection.
If the tank is in fact well mixed, the relationship between tracer concentration
and time can be found from a material balance on the tracer in the tank over a
time period Δ t.
In an ideal CSTR (or mixed reactor), the contents are well-stirred and
uniform throughout; the exit stream has the same composition as the
fluid within the vessel. However, real reactors never fully follow these
ideal flow patterns. In this experiment, we will quantify the deviation of
the Armfield CSTR from ideality using the residence time distribution
(RTD) approach. To characterize the extent of the nonideal flow, the
system will be disturbed by quickly injecting a pulse of inert tracer
(sodium hydroxide) into the CSTR. Measurements of the tracer
concentration in the reactor effluent will then be obtained from the
conductivity readings recorded by the computer.
d C (t )
V = − v C (t ), t > 0
dt
or
d C (t )
t = − C (t ) (1)
dt
V
t = (2)
v
represents the average length of time that a “batch” of fluid spends in the
vessel.
By solving the differential equation (1) with boundary condition C (0) ≡ C0
= N 0 / V , we obtain
⎛ t⎞
C (t ) = C0 exp ⎜ − ⎟ (3)
⎝ t⎠
C (t )
E (t ) = (4)
Q
with
∞
Q ≡ ∫ C (t ) dt
0
∫ E (t ) dt = 1
0
t1
∫ E (t ) dt
0
∞ t1
∫ E (t ) dt = 1 − ∫ E (t ) dt
t1 0
or
M
t ≈ ∑ ti E (ti ) Δ t (6)
i =1
if the mean residence time is to be approximated from M measurements of
the tracer exit concentration collected at regular intervals of Δ t time
units.
t N −1 exp (− N t / t )
E (t ) = (7)
( N − 1)! ( t / N ) N
(t )2
N = (8)
σ2
∞ ∞
σ2 = ∫ (t − t ) 2 E (t ) dt = ∫t
2
E (t ) dt − ( t ) 2
0 0
M
≈ ∑ ti2 E (ti ) Δ t − ( t ) 2
i =1
i) Turn on the power switch of the chemical reactor service unit. Turn on
the computer.
ii) Double-click the CSTR icon on the Windows desktop. Familiarize yourself
with the basic features of the Armsoft package, especially the mimic
diagram, graph and data table.
iii) If necessary, fill the reagent vessels with de-ionized water and set the feed
pumps and agitator for manual operation.
iv) Gradually increase the speed of feed pump by rotating the speed dial
clockwise until 45cm3/min.
v) Allow the water level in the CSTR to build until it reaches the top of the
standpipe and effluent starts flowing to drain.
vi) Select the “View Data in Graph Format” tab and trend “Run #1 Measured
Conductivity (mS)” on the primary y-axis. Return to the “View Diagram”
tab, left-click the “Configure” button and fix the sampling interval at 2
seconds. Click “OK” to close this dialog box then “Start Sample”.
vii) Make up 2 ml of tracer solution by dissolving approx. 4M of sodium
hydroxide pellets in de-ionized water.
viii) Fill a 2ml syringe with the tracer solution. Lower a piece of flexible tubing
through the conductivity gland until it nearly touches the bottom of the
reactor and insert the syringe. Quickly inject the solution and withdraw
the flexible tubing.
ix) Observe the conductivity readings as they are plotted in real time on the
computer.
x) When the measured conductivity has returned to its initial value (when
the conductivity values become steady), turn off the agitator and repeat
steps viii) and ix) with different flow rate (75cm3/min).
xi) When the experiment is complete, stop the data collection by clicking the
“Stop Sample” button. Save your results in Formula One and Excel
formats.
xii) Set all controls on the reactor service unit to minimum/off and turn off
the unit. Drain the contents of the CSTR.
5) DATA
We measured the conductivity Collected at 250c with stirrer speed at 52% for
45cm3/min and 75cm3/min hydroxide flow rate.
6) DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The data obtained was for two different hydroxide flow rate at 25oC.
Hence, it took a bit greater time 16min for the slower flow rate (45cm3/min)
than the higher flow rate (75cm3/min) which is 13min as we can see from the
data.
The mixing is fast with the higher flow rate as shown in the plot.
The graph was done by using excel for the data which is collected within 2 sec
variation by using computer interface.
The deviations from ideal reactor conditions pose several problems in the
design and analysis of reactors.Short Circuiting or By-Pass – Reactant flows
into the tank through the inlet and then directly goes out through the outlet
without reacting if the inlet and outlet are close by or if there exists an easy
route between the two.
As we can see from the plot there is three points. These are because of the
mixing until distribution of the tracer becomes uniform. Otherwise the result
that we obtained is very good and similar with the theoretical expected one.