RENDER: Should Christians pay taxes?

The Bible says this:· “Tell us therefore, what thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto
Caesar, or not?” But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, “Why tempt ye me, ye
hypocrites? Shew me the tribute money”. And they brought unto him a penny. And he saith
unto them, “Whose is this image and superscription?” They say unto him, “Caesar’s”. Then
saith he unto them, “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God
the things that are God’s.” When they had heard these words, they marveled, and left him, and
went their way.[1]o The coin ‘penny’ was not a penny but a denarius which had the Emperor
Tiberius Caesar image on it. He ruled 14 AD to 37 AD The inscription on the obverse reads
Tiberivs Caesar Divi Avgvsti Filivs Avgvstvs (“Caesar Augustus Tiberius, son of
the Divine Augustus”).
What exist that does not belong to God? Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For
there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever, therefore,
resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to
themselves damnation. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then
not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For
he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he
beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon
him that doeth evil. Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for
conscience sake. For this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God’s ministers, attending
continually upon this very thing. Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is
due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour. Owe no man any
thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
[2]This is a classic statement whenever you talk to Christians, especially Clergy, who are not
lawyers nor have they studied the “laws” concerning taxes, however, it is taken out of context.
The first thing you have to understand is that Caesar does not rule us. Caesar is dead.
Furthermore, “for rulers are not a terror to good works”, So, Christ was not on a Cross dying for
our sins? Christ was evil? This would appear to be a passage to remind the people, to respect
those that can kill you for your beliefs.
We, the people, have a unique form of government. Of the People, by the People and for the
People: A democracy: Mammonism. However, I believe: Of God, By God, and For God: A
Republican form of Government: Common Law, Supreme law of the land. Rome was an Empire.
An Empire is a group of States, of Countries, ruled by Kings. Thus, an Emperor is actually King of
Kings. This is different than the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom includes England,
Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, of which no longer have their own Kings, as where in an
Empire, the emperor rules over the Kings within their Kingdom. The Divine right of Kings:
1Samuel 8:11-18 This will be the manner of the king that shall reign over you: He will take your
sons, and appoint them for himself, for his chariots, and to be his horsemen; and some shall run
before his chariots. And he will appoint him captains over thousands, and captains over fifties;
1
and will set them to ear his ground, and to reap his harvest, and to make his instruments of
war, and instruments of his chariots. And he will take your daughters to be confectionaries, and
to be cooks, and to be bakers. And he will take your fields, and your vineyards, and your olive
yards, even the best of them, and give them to his servants. And he will take the tenth of your
seed, and of your vineyards, and give to his officers, and to his servants. And he will take your
menservants, and your maidservants, and your goodliest young men, and your asses, and put
them to his work. He will take the tenth of your sheep: and ye shall be his servants. And ye shall
cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not
hear you in that day.
The Roman Empire developed the Law of Nations due to conflicts between different people and
established Roman Law. The importance of this is to establish their kind of
government. Remember, God never wanted a Man to be King. 1Samuel 8:4-8 Then all the
elders of Israel gathered themselves together, and came to Samuel unto Ramah, and said unto
him, Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us
like all the nations. But the thing displeased Samuel, when they said, give us a king to judge us.
And Samuel prayed unto the LORD. And the LORD said unto Samuel, hearken unto the voice of
the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have
rejected me, that I should not reign over them. Why is it more condemnation if you resist that
which God never wanted verses accepting God as your King? [1]Matthew 22:17-22 [2]Romans
13:1-8

So we are back to obey the government. The patriots of 1770's did they obey the king? They
were patriots because they believed in freedom, no oppression and rejected laws that took
their property, wealth, and freedom. They were patriots not because they obeyed the
government but because they obeyed God in spite of a rightful king. So let us obey our
government: 1930 the Oregon Supreme Court (Redfield vs. Fisher, Or. Sup.Ct. 292 at 813, 817,
819) stated " The Individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of
existing". A corporation does work by selling its services or product and makes profit. A
corporation is not a person and therefore should be taxed on its income. A person on the other
hand, exercising his God given right to exist and receive compensation for work in order to live,
is being taxed by this system as a corporation. “The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot
be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity which owes its
existence and charter powers to the state; but the individuals’ Right to live and own property
are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an excise cannot be imposed.” Corn v. Fort, 95
S.W.2d 620 (1936)

Title 15 §17 The labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce.

Title 26 § 6012- Persons required to make returns of income(a) General rule; Returns with

2
respect to income taxes under subtitle A shall be made by the following:(1) (A) Every individual
having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption
amount, except that a return shall not be required of an individual— (i) who is not married, is
not a surviving spouse, is not a head of a household (ii) who is a head of a household (iii) who is
a surviving spouse (iv) who is entitled to make a joint return (Married)

In the above title 26: these are non-corporate position or status. A corporation can merge, but
cannot marry or divorce. CEO's Presidents and other corporate members may die, but is never
called a surviving spouse. As a corporation has a headquarters but not a house. The corporation
may own a house but can never be head or not head of spouse, as it is in paper only.

All Three branches of government are a part of you not paying taxes- you are exempt from
taxes.
Who or what Legal authority told you, you had to pay? Your boss? Media? Family? Friends?
Parents? Which one of these has a law degree?
The income tax came out during WWII, to help pay for the war. Then slowly it became ingrained
into our way of life. To pay for the War, to pay for the Cold War, to pay for other wars, to pay
the Federal Reserve. You never received a formal letter from the IRS to pay for taxes based on...
Now they call it voluntary compliance. This is the military idea. We have an all voluntary military
and when you join, you are subject to the orders, even bad ones. So by your words and actions,
you volunteered to have the IRS take from you that which is yours. You gave up your rights and
immunities. Now you have duties and obligations.

I studied ministries: In the IRS publication 557 states, that you do not have to register with the
IRS, and that a church/ministry is “exempt automatically”. Therefore, if a church or ministry
forms a 501(c)(3) corporation with the state, they “sign away” in a “legal contract” the rights of
their organization under the constitution. A church or ministry does not have to apply for an
exemption. They are already exempt by its very definition. There is no law that requires a
church or ministry to apply for exemption. What is Gods, is Gods. In other words, a 503(c)(3)
Church has chosen a new master to do its work under. Therefore, we see from the above
information, that the church exists as an exempt organization under the laws of the United
States of America; that is, the church and its auxiliaries; and not the people, persons,
individuals, men and/or women who establish it. Under the no law concept of the First Article
of the Constitution for the United States of America, is there any requirement, by law, for the
church/ministry to make application for recognition of Exempt Status? Under Title 26 § 508(a) it
states: “New organizations must notify the secretary that they are applying for recognition of
501(c)(3) status except as provided in Subsection (c). Found in Code 508(c)(1), “Exceptions
- mandatory exceptions- subsection (a), shall not apply to- (A) Churches, their integrated
auxiliaries, and conventions or associations of churches.” Therefore, even the “Code” provides
3
that the “Churches and their auxiliaries” do not have to notify the secretary that they are
applying for recognition of exempt status! What are auxiliaries? Ministries, Kings, Priests,
Ambassadors, Disciples, Saints, Children of God, those in the Kingdom of Heaven, any
gatherings in the name of the Lord, and anything relating to religion, any religion. So like
people, churches are also exempt. but wait, churches pay taxes- why? According to Norton v.
Shelby Co., a 501(c)(3) organization/corporation is a “creature” of the legislature, created by
the state and therefore controlled by the state. It has no constitutional rights except for a
limited first amendment right to advertise; (Va. State Board of Pharmacy v. Va. Citizen’s
Councilor the “Ashwander Doctrine”). In other words, this fictional “person” has no rights. It
only has privileges - which can be taken away at anytime by the state. In fact, all statutory
organizations, (created by legislature) and known as “public entities” are controlled by the
state. Which are you? Have you joined as a creature of the State? Or are you a gathering of
people under Christ? When every other organization and private person is allegedly required to
file an annual tax return, does the church also have to file? The problem lies upon the so called
“advice” the IRS presents to an organization informing them that they may want to be
recognized as a tax-exempt organization in order for donors to have a tax deductibility. After
applying for an EIN number on the SS4 form, the IRS will send you a letter to which they inform
you, in form 557, that you can file a 1023 form to be recognized. Applying for an EIN number in
and of itself does not make a church or ministry a corporation, nor does it give the state any
control. The only reason to apply for an EIN number is for a checking account -- and that is all!
Therefore, it becomes a choice. What is created by the state is controlled and “owned” by the
state. Therefore, Corporations are not necessarily tax-exempt. “For a charitable corporation to
receive ‘tax-exempt’ status as a 501(c)(3) corporation, it must meet the requirements of the
IRS, as well as the requirements of the state. This is one area where federal law can control a
corporation even though there is no corporate federal law!” An example of this was the
Independent Christian Church in Philadelphia. On the eve of the 1992 Presidential election, the
Church took out a full-page ad in USA TODAY. The ad urged Christians to vote for the person
running against “Slick Willie” because it was alleged that he was a known womanizer and a
suspected drug dealer. After the election, the IRS investigated this independent 501(c)(3)
Church, took them to court, dissolved their corporation, and distributed the Church
assets/funds according to the good pleasure of the IRS.
The following is a story about what happened to a “501(c)(3) Church” a few years ago: “There
was a small Baptist Church in Nebraska. The pastor's name was Louis Sullivan. The Church
decided they would start a Church School. They wanted to educate their children in their brand
of religion and therefore wanted to choose their own teachers. Therefore, they hired teachers
who were not licensed as teachers and opened the Church School. It was not long until the
state found out about it and told the pastor to cease and desist operating a school or get
teachers who were licensed. This Church did neither. One morning as the students were coming
to Church to attend School, the doors of the Church were chained shut. Later in court, after the
Attorney General for Nebraska gave his opening remarks, the judge turned to the pastor and

4
said, “Pastor, do you have anything you want to say?” The pastor stood up and said, “Yes, your
Honor. The U.S. Constitution gives my Church the right to freedom of religious speech, religious
assembly and worship”. The judge looked at him and said, “Pastor Sullivan, is your Church
incorporated?” Pastor Sullivan said, “Yes your Honor, it is”. The judge said, “Pastor Sullivan, sit
down and be quiet. You mention the constitution one more time in my court and I will hold you
in contempt. When your organization incorporated as a 501(c)(3) organization, it contracted
away every constitutional right you thought it had”. The first clue to the above proceedings
should have been the heading of the lawsuit. It read, “The State of Nebraska, a corporation
verses Faith Baptist Church, ‘Incorporated’”. This was one corporation suing another
corporation, in civil law, guilty unless proven innocent. In addition, because it is a corporation
suing a corporation, there are no constitutional rights. It was a commercial case. The only law
that applies is, Corporate Law. The duty of the government is to regulate commerce involved
internationally for profit.
There is another, a Florida case, of an independent Seventh-day Adventist Church Pastor, by the
name of Raphael Perez, who was being sued by the General Conference of Seventh-day
Adventists for infringing upon their trademark. The only issue before the court was the right to
use the name “SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST” or “SDA” for the Church. Since the Church was not
related by contract with the General Conference SDA Church, and since the General Conference
SDA Church had a trademark on this name, the General Conference SDA Church sued the pastor
of the independent Church for using the name “SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST” or “SDA” without a
license to do so. As a side bar, it may be interesting to note here, that an attorney met with
Pastor Perez prior to the hearing of this suit and informed him that he would probably lose the
case since the Church was a 501(c)(3) corporation. It was too bad, he was either naive or
arrogant and would not listen to what was told to him. While it is written: Luke 11:52: Woe
unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves,
and them that were entering in ye hindered. In this case 1Samuel 2:3 Talk no more so
exceeding proudly; let not arrogancy come out of your mouth: for the LORD isa God of
knowledge, and by him actions are weighed. Proverbs 11:2 When pride cometh, then cometh
shame: but with the lowly is wisdom. Sure enough, on April 27, 2000, Pastor Perez lost the case.
He had been told that he should get out of the 501(c)(3) corporation and let one who knew
how to construct a non-501(c)(3) church organization to which the General Conference of the
SDA Church could do nothing. His words fell on deaf ears, just like many other people, pastors,
ministers, and leaders of other churches and ministries. An attorney who knew about 501(c) (3)
corporation contacted Reverend Dixon’s Indianapolis Baptist Temple, in regards to a legal battle
with the IRS over a 6 million dollar lien the IRS filed against them because they refused to be a
tax collector. Reverend Dixon said that they did not need any help from this attorney because
they “had faith” (more like presumption), that they were going to win the battle: pride and
arrogance. He went on to tell me that they “had been a 501(c)(3) corporation”, but they had
never changed their paper work and just informed the IRS that they were not going to function
as a 501(c)(3) corporation any more. The IRS filed the lien after Reverend Dixon kept ignoring

5
IRS’s demands. Dixon said that his lawyers were handling the case and they were sure they
were going to win. Well, they did not. The judge ruled for the IRS. Later, the IRS confiscated the
Church and it is assets. In the September 2001 issue of Christian Times, it was reported that the
judge ordered Reverend Dixon to pay $136,610.04 from his own assets. Dixon said that he was
broke, and that he had now retired and was living in a mobile home. He needed to properly
inform the IRS that the 501(c)(3) corporation had ended. It should be pointed out that if you do
not properly undo a 501(c)(3) corporation that you may wind up with this type of trouble too.
Even if you want to keep the 501(c)(3) corporation, you must be able to show paper work that
proves that you are only using it for advertising and other related business. All other work must
be done through the Self-Supported Ministry/non-501(c)(3) church organization and must have
the proper paper work, which provides the evidence necessary to stay lawful. Even though I
could write pages on this issue, my bottom line answer comes in the form of a question. What
does God require? Jesus said, “Give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” but most importantly – “and
unto God, what is God’s”. This just about raps it up. Did not Christ require us to bare our own
cross? Should not everything you have and do belong to God? Do not we belong to God? Are
we citizens of the Kingdom of Heaven, or are we citizens of the United States? Chose one
master and live it. The truth will set you free! Therefore, the solution lies in to undoing what
you did. And the first thing to realize is that voluntary means choice, elect. You have officially
elected to be a part of the US Citizenship. Since the IRS claims congress passed the laws on
taxes and their limited authority is DC and its territories, that is to say, residents of DC, only if
you elect to be treated as if you were a resident, are you subject to the tax, by your will, of
which are your actions, desires, by claiming to be a US Resident or filing taxes. Title 26 §
2001(a): Imposition: A tax is hereby imposed on the transfer of the taxable estate of
every decedent who is a citizen or resident of the United States.”· Every decedent who is a
US Citizen. Decedents are generally thought of as dead, Therefore, US Citizens are dead,

Residents of Washington DC are dead, The dead can be taxed, Commerce is taxed, The use of
money is commerce, All crimes are commercial; 27 CFR 72.11,o You cannot serve God and
Wealth; Luke 16:13,o You cannot serve two masters; Matthew 6:24, o Malum in se, are
crimes, are sins, and the wages of sin is death; Romans 6:23.o The Congressional Record, June
13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646 – “A ‘citizen of the United States’ is a civilly dead entity operating as
a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc.
under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4."Title
26 Section 6331(a) Authority of Secretary: If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses
to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to
collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by
levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section
6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the
payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any
officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any
agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of
6
levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected
official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and
demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or
refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day
period provided in this section. So you officially made an election when you sent in your tax
return- I want IN! I don't want freedom! I renounce God! Deception is so much better then
lying. Title 26 § 6013(f)(4); (g)(4)(A)); or Joint returns of income tax by husband and wife Pub.
L. 113-15. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.) (f)Joint return where individual is in
missing status (4) Making of election; revocation an election described in this subsection with
respect to any taxable year may be made by filing a joint return in accordance with subsection
(a) and under such regulations as may be prescribed by the Secretary. Such an election may
be revoked by either spouse on or before the due date (including extensions) for such taxable
year, and, in the case of an executor or administrator, may be revoked by disaffirming as
provided in the last sentence of subsection (a)(3). (g)Election to treat nonresident alien
individual as resident of the United States (4) Termination of election An election under this
subsection shall terminate at the earliest of the following times: (A) Revocation by taxpayers If
either taxpayer revokes the election, as of the first taxable year for which the last day
prescribed by law for filing the return of tax under chapter 1 has not yet occurred. So you made
an election, choice, volunteered, under the Tax Laws- now, its time to undo Revocation of
Election- UNVOLUNTEER- Change your mind.26 CFR § 1.871-10 (d)(2)(iii)(d) Manner of making
or revoking an election—(2) Revocation, or election, with consent of Commissioner (iii) Written
request required. A request to revoke an election made under this section when such
revocation requires the consent of the Commissioner, or to make a new election when such
election requires the consent of the Commissioner, shall be made in writing and shall be
addressed to the Director of International Operations, Internal Revenue Service, Washington,
DC 20225. The request shall include the name and address of the taxpayer and shall be signed
by the taxpayer or his duly authorized representative. It must specify the taxable year for which
the revocation or new election is to be effective and shall be filed within 75 days after the close
of the first taxable year for which it is desired to make the change. The request must specify the
grounds which are considered to justify the revocation or new election. The Director of
International Operations may require such other information as may be necessary in order to
determine whether the proposed change will be permitted. A copy of the consent by the
Director of International Operations shall be attached to the taxpayer's return required under
section 6012 and the regulations thereunder for the taxable year for which the revocation or
new election is effective. A copy of such consent may not be filed with any return under section
6851 and the regulations there under. So did you ever receive a formal letter from the
commissioner on his accepting your election? Why not? Because everyone would know and
stop. So do you need consent to revoke? Depends, Your volunteering- making an election is
contractual- what do we need to know about contracts? Contracts have to knowing, willingly,
intentionally and voluntary with full disclosures. What destroys a contract is hiding information
necessary to make an informed decision, Threats, duress or coercion. The bible says to love God
7
with all your heart, mind, body and soul. So it is, Heart, intention; mind, knowingly; body,
willingly; soul, voluntary. All factors or it is invalid. fraud, n.1. A knowing misrepresentation of
the truth or concealment of a material fact to induce another to act to his or her detriment. •
Fraud is usually a tort, but in some cases (esp. when the conduct is willful) it may be a crime. —
Also termed intentional fraud. [Cases: Fraud 1, 3, 16.] 2. A misrepresentation made recklessly
without belief in its truth to induce another person to act. [Cases: Fraud 31.] 3. A tort arising
from a knowing misrepresentation, concealment of material fact, or reckless misrepresentation
made to induce another to act to his or her detriment. [Cases: Fraud 13(3).] 4. Unconscionable
dealing; esp., in contract law, the unfair use of the power arising out of the parties' relative
positions and resulting in an unconscionable bargain. But, you came to the IRS with a form-
they didn't say squat. They are held harmless, how are they suppose to know that was not your
intention? So the IRS acts in good faith, if you fail to do your duty, they will take, because you
agreed. Revocating the Election Sir, regarding Elections: As John Doe has never been notified by
the Secretary, minion, or Agent of any valid, statutory, legal, lawful or assumed requirement to
file any kind of return; that the returns that have been filed were for jurisdiction that John
Doe is not in or subject to; that within IRS codes there are indications that John Doe is exempt;
it would appear that the IRS assumes John Doe has made an election. So ask them: Is an
election in place, making John Doe or JOHN DOE SMITH, a taxpayer/tax payer/US Citizen, or
treated as a US citizen, under the Tax codes? Destroy the allege or presumption of a valid
contract. note: Your first and middle name is your name, what your mother or parents named
you- last names are a new creation. Avoid I's me's, you and yours as much as possible- don't be
a pronoun. If yes; then know John-Doe never willingly, intentionally, knowingly, and/or
voluntarily with full disclosure made an election under Title 26 § 6013 or any other part of Title
26.[ 1]More Proof you did not intentionally do this act. Remove alled permissions: They have
forms to voluntary elect. John-Doe has never filed the required forms for an election, to the
best of John Doe knowledge these are Forms 8832, and 2553, nor has John-Doe ever given
anyone power of attorney to do this for John-Doe, nor has warranted any such actions. John-
Doe has never knowingly, willing, intentionally to lead anyone to a wrong conclusion. John-
Doe does not understand how, if such a misconception exists, this could have happened. No
surrogate to John-Doe’s knowledge or belief has been authorized; therefore, it must be
an executor de son tort. Since your dead, all your property is "up for grabs" belongs to the
Government acting as an executor for the estate. Men have higher authority to act as
executors, and if you did not give permission it would be by executor in his own wrong:
Executor de son tort. All actions by an executor de son tort are hereby nullified. John-
Doe revokes that allege, assumed, illegal, or actual, election. [2]To the best of John-
Doe’s knowledge, John-Doe does not need the consent of the commissioner to revoke that
which John-Doe never intended to elect, if such an election exists. Contracts must be made
with full disclosures, willingly, intentionally, knowingly acts. As John-Doe has never been told
and completely unaware and never seen any such copy, there can be no agreement to
treat John-Doe as a US citizen under Title 26. [3]Give valid and undeniable grounds, also set
them up for criminal actions by someone. Grounds for the request: John-
8
Doe constitutional, i.e. God Given and government recognized rights to life, liberty, pursuit of
happiness, privacy, respect, the fruits of John-Doe’s common right labors under common law,
and the right to own and control property (including labor and the fruits of John-Doe ’s labor)
without any interference from government, or requirement to report, account for, such income
or assets on such property. As waivers of Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they
must be knowingly intelligent acts, done with sufficient awareness of the relevant
circumstances and consequences. [4]If any action has taken place, then a crime has been
committed, and any information to have this guilty party arrested would be most appreciated.
Deliberate withholding of information would be aiding and abetting criminal activity, if not
outright conspiracy to deprive John-Doe of John-Doe ’s rights and immunities. Sir, this is by no
means an admission in any way that John-Doe ever made a Election to treat any compensation
for John-Doe ’s labor, allege ‘income’, or assets as effectively connected with a trade or
business in the United States, but instead is submitted to ensure that John-Doe status is
properly reflected in the records and that this Agent does indeed concur with and respect this
notification of request for this Agent’s concurrence. John-Doe does not now nor has John-
Doe ever lived in the ‘United States’ as defined in Title 26 §7701, nor does John-Doe intend to
do so in the future. John-Doe is sorry, please forgive John-Doe, if John-Doe ever gave any
Agent the idea that John-Doe did, for instance, mistakenly filing an IRS form 1040 in the past, or
other returns, which was the incorrect form. Sir, to the best of John-Doe ’s knowledge, and
belief, John-Doe has never been naturalized nor voluntarily ever declare, accepted or
acknowledge any allege/actual allegiance and/or fidelity to any domestic/foreign prince,
potentate, principality, state, flag or sovereignty whatsoever, nor to any subject, citizen, officer,
employee, or elected official, nor any Agency or instrumentality of any Country or Corporation;
Non assumpsit; save First-Middle’s God, King and Master. Let it be known that John-Doe has
not gone before a proper court with the intentions of declaring to become a US Citizen. John-
Doe has never intended as to appear to have rejected or renounce John-Doe ’s God or the
Kingdom of Heaven;[5]and no man can obey two masters,[6], and the law cannot demand the
impossible (i.e. require that we obey two masters), nor can the government impair the
Covenant between God and His people,[7]nor can we be placed in any involuntary servitude
absent of any conviction of intentional crimes. Any action that might appear to be acting in a
fashion other then obedience to John-Doe ’s Master, God, King, and Lord is based upon
deception, or due to Quia Timet.[8]In the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Amen.
[1]Brady v. U.S.,397 U.S. 742, 748 [2]United States Code Title 26 § 6013(f)(4); (g)(4)(A)); or 26
CFR § 1.871-10 (d)(2)(iii). [3]U.S. v. Cruikshank,92 U.S. 542, 23 L.Ed. 588. [4]Brady v. U.S.,397
U.S. 742 at 748 [5]Holy Bible Philippians 3:20 [6]Holy Bible Matthew6:24 [7]United States
Constitution: Article 1: Section. 10. No State shall pass any Law impairing the Obligation of
Contracts; 1st9th& 10thAmendments. [8]Quia Timet: Because he fears.

Revocation of election as you cannot serve 2 masters, love God with all your heart, mind, body
and soul- the truth will set you free