INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality
Services Knowledge and knowledge of
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2

learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
develop critical and and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking
creative thinking, as skills and/or other skills and/or other skills and/or other
well as other higher HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in
order thinking skills. MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5

7.5%
 order thinking skills. MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons
lessons as evidenced as evidenced by MOV as evidenced by MOV
by MOV 1 and 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
supported by any 1 of any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
the other given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality
Services Environment and classroom structure
Diversity of to engage learners, Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
Learners individually or in management management management
groups, in meanigful strategies that strategies that strategies that
exploration, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
discovery and activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
hands-on activities shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
within a range of 7.5% a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5
physical learning
Efficiency
environments.
Submitted at least 4
lessons supported by Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons
MOV 1 and any 1 of supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1
the other acceptable and any 1 of the other and any 1 of the other
MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed learner Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher
Services behavior management management management
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that promote behavior that promote behavior that promote
and non-violent positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
discipline to ensure violent discipline as violent discipline as violent discipline as
learning-focused shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
environment submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5

7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4

of the given strategies of the given strategies of the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2
least 4 lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied differentiated Applied differentiated
Services Environment and differentiated, teaching strategies to teaching strategies to
Diversity of developmentally address learner address learner
Applied differentiated
Learners appropriate learning diversity as shown in diversity as shown in
teaching strategies to
experiences to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learner
address learners’ of 7 of 5
diversity as shown in
gender, needs,
MOV 1 with a rating
strengths, interests
of 6
and experiences.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching
7.5% strategies in at least strategies in at least 2 strategies in 2
2 lessons as lessons as evidenced lessons as evidenced
evidenced by MOV 1 by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and
and supported by any supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
1 of the other the other acceptable the other acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
 Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
sequenced teaching and learning process and learning process and learning process
and learning as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
processes to meet with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
and learning process and learning process and learning process
as evidently shown in as evidently shown in as evidently shown in
MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Planning collegial discussions participated in participated in participated in
that use teacher LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/
and learner to discuss to discuss meetings to discuss
feedback to enrich teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
teaching practice. feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
instruction as shown instruction as shown instruction as shown
in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted

7.5%

Efficiency Participated in at least Participated in 3 Participated in 2

4 LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/meetings
LACs/FGDs/meetings as evidently shown in as evidently shown in
as evidently shown in any 1 of the given any 1 of the given
any 1 of the given MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used
Services developed, varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and
organized and used learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
appropriate including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
teaching and address learning address learning address learning
learning resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5
goals.

Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied

7.5% teaching and learning teaching and learning
resources, including resources, including
ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently
 Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied
7.5% teaching and learning teaching and learning
resources, including resources, including
ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently
Submitted at least 4 shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and
varied teaching and supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
learning resources, the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV
including ICT, as
evidently shown in
MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected,
Services and Reporting selected, organized organized and used organized and used organized and used
and used diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative
diagnostic, and summative and summative and summative
formative and assessment assessment assessment
summative strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent
assessment with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum
strategies requirements as requirements as requirements as
consistent with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
curriculum a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5
requirements.

7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied

varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools as
tools as evidently evidently shown in evidently shown in
shown in any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently monitored Occasionally
Services evaluated learner monitored and and evaluated learner monitored and
progress and evaluated learner progress and evaluated learner
achievement using progress and achievement using progress and
learner attainment achievement using learner attainment achievement using
data. learner attainment data as shown in the learner attainment
data as shown in the MOV submitted data as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a
combination of at combination of 2 of
least 4 of the Submitted a the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV combination of 3 of
the acceptable MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2
quarters quarters quarters
 Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica ted Quality Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed
Services and Reporting promptly and clearly prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear
the learners’ needs, communication of the communication of the communication of the
progress and learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
achievement to key progress and progress and progress and
stakeholders, achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
including parents/ stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
guardians. including parents/ including parents/ including parents/
guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted

7.5%

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2
quarters quarters quarters
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently performed Occasionally
Services various related performed various various related performed various
works/activities that related work/activities work/activities that related work/activities
contribute to the that contribute to the contribute to the that contribute to the
teaching-learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
process. process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
10%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 different

different kinds of kinds of acceptable kinds of acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF
below 1.499 Poor Ratee R
MENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
evidence was
Showed knowledge shown
of content and its
integration within
and across subject
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4
Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
the given MOV evidence was
shown

Facilitated using No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

different teaching evidence was
strategies that shown
promote reading
writing and/or
numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
learner-centered evidence was
lessons as shown
evidently shown in
any of the other
given MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Used different No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
teaching strategies evidence was shown
that develop critical
and creative thinking
skills and/or other
HOTS as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4
 MOV 1 with a rating
of 4

Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable

evidenced by any of evidence was shown
the other given MOV

No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

evidence was shown
Used classroom
management
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/tasks as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 4
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
supported by any of evidence was shown
the acceptable MOV

Applied teacher No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

management evidence was shown
strategies of learner
behavior that promote
positive and non-
violent discipline as
shown in MOV
submitted with a
rating of 4

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the given strategies evidence was shown
as observed in only 1
lesson

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Applied differentiated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
teaching strategies to evidence was shown
address learner
diversity as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4

Submitted any 1 No acceptable

differentiated teaching evidence was shown
strategy in only 1
lesson as evidently
shown in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
 Planned and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
implemented evidence was shown
developmentally
sequenced teaching
and learning process
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
developmentally evidence was shown
sequenced teaching
and learning process
as evidently shown in
any 1 of the given
MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely participated in No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
LAC/FGD/ meeting to evidence was shown
discuss
teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
instruction as shown
in the MOV submitted

Participated in 1 No acceptable
LAC/FGD/meeting as evidence was shown
evidently shown in
any 1 of the given
MOV

Developed and used No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

varied teaching and evidence was shown
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address learning
goals as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4

Submitted any No acceptable

teaching and learning evidence was shown
resource, including
ICT, as evidently
 Submitted any No acceptable
teaching and learning evidence was shown
resource, including
ICT, as evidently
shown in any of the
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Designed, selected, No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
organized and used evidence was shown
diagnostic, formative
and summative
assessment
strategies consistent
with curriculum
requirements as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool as evidence was shown
evidently shown in
any of the acceptable
MOV

Rarely monitored and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

evaluated learner evidence was shown
progress and
achievement using
learner attainment
data as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
acceptable MOV evidence was shown

Submitted MOV was No acceptable

completed in only 1 evidence was shown
quarter
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely showed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
prompt and clear evidence was shown
communication of the
learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the given MOV evidence was shown

Submitted MOV was No acceptable

completed in only 1 evidence was shown
quarter
Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
various related evidence was shown
work/activities that
contribute to the
teaching learning
process as shown in
the MOV submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

the acceptable MOV evidence was shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPC
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numerical

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER

Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
ient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FOR

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other
MOV given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action
conduct and application disseminated action research with
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness Presented the Completed the
research report research report
within the rating within the rating
period period

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other
 Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3

more lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom
management of management management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
environments.environm Efficiency
ents. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
lessons supported lessons supported
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
 Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of
the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3
least 4 lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the
differentiated, in the department or
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning process as learning process as
and learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
to meet curriculum with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3
lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3

collaborative collaborative
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the
selection, organization, in the selection, selection,
development and use of organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3

teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools
curriculum as evidently shown as evidently shown
requirements. in any of the in any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data assessment data
support learner as shown in the as shown in the
7.5%
progress and MOV submitted MOV submitted
achievement.
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3
different types of of the same kind of
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently Frequently applied
Services effective communication applied skills in the skills in the
of learner needs, effective effective
progress and communication of communication of
achievement to key learner needs and learner needs and
stakeholders, including progress to progress to
parents/guardians. parents/ guardians parents/ guardians
7.5% as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3

of the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently
Services related works/activities performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently
Services related works/activities performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3
different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER
below 1.499 Poor Ratee
ENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

NNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was
applications of applications of shown
content knowledge content knowledge
within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 6 of 5
Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown
1 from colleagues colleagues and
and supported by supported by any 1
any 1 of the other of the other MOV
MOV given given

Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

research with research with evidence was
colleagues colleagues shown

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV MOV evidence was
shown
Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating shown
period period

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
well as other well as other
 strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
well as other well as other
higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

lessons as as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in in MOV 1 and shown
MOV 1 and supported by any of
supported by any 1 the other MOV
of the other MOV given
given

No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Modeled and Modeled and evidence was
shared effective shared effective shown
classroom classroom
management management
strategies that strategies that
engage learners inengage learners in
activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
done in different done in different
physical learning physical learning
environments as environments as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6with a rating of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted 2
supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported
the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any
MOV
1 of the other
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
and constructive and constructive evidence was
behavior behavior shown
management skills management skills
by applying positive by applying positive
and non-violent and non-violent
discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
 Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable
the given strategies given strategies as evidence was
as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown
lessons lesson

Worked with Worked with No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown
with others with others

Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable

lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was
shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown
and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no
any acceptable evidence of sharing
MOV with others

Developed and Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

applied effective applied effective evidence was
strategies showing strategies showing shown
developmentally- developmentally-
sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the other
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaborative collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidenced by the evidenced by the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher of teacher and shown
and learner learner feedback as
feedback as evidently shown in
evidently shown in any of the
MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV
 Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
in the selection, selection, shown
organization, organization,
development and development and
appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resource shown
as evidenced by at as evidenced by
least 1 of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

reviewed collaboratively evidence was
collaboratively assessment tools shown
assessment tools with colleagues as
with colleagues as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
in any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
colleagues in the the interpretation of shown
interpretation of assessment data
assessment data as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

of the same kind of the MOV evidence was
MOV shown

Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

applied skills in the in the effective evidence was
effective communication of shown
communication of learner needs and
learner needs and progress to
progress to parents/ guardians
parents/ guardians as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1

MOV MOV

Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
tasks and/or assignments as shown
assignments as shown in the MOV
Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
tasks and/or assignments as shown
assignments as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted
Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IP
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teache

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numeric

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER

Ratee Rater
REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority