Lectures On Computational Fluid Dynamics PDF
Lectures On Computational Fluid Dynamics PDF
dynamics
Applications to human thermodynamics
Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Nikolai Kornev; Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Irina
Cherunova
2
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics: Applications to human thermodynamics
1st edition
© 2015 Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Nikolai Kornev & Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Irina Cherunova &
bookboon.com
ISBN 978-87-403-0815-0
3
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Contents
Contents
List of Tables 10
List of Figures 11
Preface 15
www.sylvania.com
We do not reinvent
the wheel we reinvent
light.
Fascinating lighting offers an infinite spectrum of
possibilities: Innovative technologies and new
markets provide both opportunities and challenges.
An environment in which your expertise is in high
demand. Enjoy the supportive working atmosphere
within our global group and benefit from international
career paths. Implement sustainable ideas in close
cooperation with other specialists and contribute to
influencing our future. Come and join us in reinventing
light every day.
Light is OSRAM
.
4.7 Solution of the Poisson equation (4.6) 47
4.8 Update the velocity field 47
4.9
4.10
Boundary conditions for the velocities
Calculation of the vorticity thinking 48
48
360°
thinking . 360°
thinking .
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers Dis
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers © Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Do you like cars? Would you like to be a part of a successful brand? Send us your CV on
We will appreciate and reward both your enthusiasm and talent. www.employerforlife.com
Send us your CV. You will be surprised where it can take you.
8 Computational grids 74
8.1 Grid types 74
8.2 Overset or Chimera grids 75
8.3 Morphing grids 75
9 Physics of turbulence 78
9.1 Definition of the turbulence 78
9.2 Vortex dynamics 78
9.3 Experimental observations 86
�e Graduate Programme
I joined MITAS because for Engineers and Geoscientists
I wanted real responsibili� www.discovermitas.com
Maersk.com/Mitas �e G
I joined MITAS because for Engine
I wanted real responsibili� Ma
Month 16
I was a construction Mo
supervisor ina const
I was
the North Sea super
advising and the No
Real work he
helping foremen advis
International
al opportunities
Internationa
�ree wo
work
or placements ssolve problems
Real work he
helping fo
International
Internationaal opportunities
�ree wo
work
or placements ssolve pr
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
8
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Contents
19 CFD application for design of cloth for protection from low temperatures
under wind conditions. Influence of the wind on the cloth deformation
and heat transfer from the body 190
19.1 Wind tunnel measurements of pressure distribution 190
19.2 Numerical simulations of pressure distribution and comparison
with measurements 191
19.3 Comparison of CFD results withmeasurements 192
19.4 Change of thermal conductivity caused by wind induced pressures 193
Bibliography 199
Index 203
9
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics List of Tables
List of Tables
4.1 Limiters function for TVD schemes 40
6.1 nE uE and ui at different sides. x-equation 57
6.2 Velocities at different sides. x-equation 58
6.3 Convection flux. x-equation 58
6.4 nE uE and ui at different sides. y-equation 58
6.5 Velocities at different sides. y-equation 58
6.6 Convection flux. y-equation 59
15.1 Properties of large and small scale motions 149
15.2 Advantages and disadvantages of the Smagorinsky model 152
16.1 Results of the resistance prediction using different methods. CR is the resistance
coefficient, CP is the pressure resistance and CF is the friction resistance 170
17.1 Sizes of the body used in simulations 175
17.2 Radii of the elliptical cross sections used in simulations 177
17.3 Radii of layers used in simulations in fraction of the skin thickness 178
17.4 Thermodynamic coefficients of the body layers used in simulations 181
17.5 Coefficient K depending on the test person feelings and energy expenditure
E = M/A .(W/m2). A is the body surface (m2) and M is the work (W) 185
18.1 Heat flux from the diver depending on the cloth contamination 188
19.1 Thermal conductivity factor f (z) integrated in circumferential direction 195
20.1 Boundary conditions 198
10
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics List of Figures
List of Figures
1.1 Body and surface forces acting on the liquid element 18
1.2 Forces acting on the liquid element 19
1.3 Stresses acting on the liquid cube with sizes a 21
2.1 One dimensional case 27
2.2 A sample of non uniform grid around the profile 30
4.1 Sample of the collocated grid 42
4.2 Checkerboard pressure solution on the collocated grid 42
4.3 Grid points of staggered grid 43
6.1 Staggered arrangement of finite volumes 55
6.2 SIMPLE algorithm 65
6.3 Control volume used for the pressure correction equation 68
8.1 Samples of a) structured grid for an airfoil, b) block structured grid for
cylinder in channel and c) unstructured grid for an airfoil 74
8.2 Illustration of structured grid disadvantage 74
9.1 Vorticity and vortices 80
9.2 Tornado 81
9.3 Vortices in two-dimensional and three dimensional cases 81
9.4 Velocities induced by vortices. Three dimensional curvilinear vortices
induce self induced velocities 82
9.5 Illustration of the vortex folding 83
9.6 Scenario of vortex amplication 84
9.7 Scenario of vortex reconnection 84
9.8 Sample of the vortex reconnection of tip vortices behind an airplane 86
9.9 Most outstanding results in turbulence research according to [1] 87
9.10 Sketch of the Reynolds experiment 88
9.11 Development of instability during the laminar- turbulent transition in the
circular pipe (taken from [1]) 88
9.12 Development of instability in the jet (taken from [1]) 90
9.13 Development of instability in the free jet 90
9.14 Development of instability in the free jet 90
9.15 Vortex structures in a free jet in a far field 91
9.16 Vortex structures in a free jet with acoustic impact 91
9.17 Vortex structures in a confined jet mixer flow 92
9.18 Fine vortex structures in a confined jet mixer flow. PLIF measurements by
Valery Zhdanov (LTT Rostock). Spatial resolution is 31m 93
9.19 Scenario of laminar turbulent transition in the boundary layer on a flat plate 94
11
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics List of Figures
9.20 Streaks visualized by hydrogen bubbles in the boundary layer on a flat plate 94
9.21 Conceptual model of the organization of the turbulence close to the wall
proposed by Adrian et al. (2000) 95
9.22 Vertical distribution of the velocity ux at three dierent time instants in
boundary layer 95
9.23 Illustration of the Prandtl derivation 97
9.24 Structure of the velocity distribution in the turbulent boundary layer.
U C D ux =u 98
10.1 Autocorrelation function coecient for scalar fluctuation at three different
points A, B and C across the jet mixer 101
10.2 Distribution of the integral length of the scalar field along the jet
mixer centerline 103
10.3 Autocorrelation functions in free jet flow 104
10.4 Illustrations of velocities used in calculations of the longitudinal
f and transversal g autocorrelations 105
10.5 Illustration of the autocorrelation functions f and g and Taylor microscales 106
10.6 Kurtosis of the structure function for the concentration of the scalar field
obtained in the jet mixer 110
11.1 Andrey Kolmogorov was a mathematician, preeminent in the 20th century,
who advanced various scientific fields (among them probability theory, topology,
intuitionistic logic, turbulence, classical mechanics and computational
complexity) 115
11.2 Illustration of the vortex cascado 116
11.3 Turbulent vortices revealed in DNS calculations performed by
Isazawa et al. (2007) 116
11.4 Distribution of the Kolmogorov scale along the centerline of the jet mixer
and free jet. The dissipation rate " is calculated from the k " model and
the experimental estimatin of Miller and Dimotakis (1991)
" D 48.Ud3 =d /..x x0 /=d /4 119
11.5 Three typical scale ranges in the turbulent flow at high Reynolds numbers 120
11.6 Three typical ranges of the energy density spectrum in the turbulent flow at
high Reynolds number. 1- energy containing range, 2- inertial subrange, 3-
dissipation range 121
11.7 Experimental confirmation of the Kolmogorov law. The compensated energy
spectrum for different flows. 122
11.8 Experimental confirmation of the Kolmogorov law for the concentration
fluctuations in the jet mixer. Measurements of the LTT Rostock 122
11.9 Three main methods of turbulent flows modelling 123
11.10 Vortex structures resolved by different models 124
12
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics List of Figures
13
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics List of Figures
14
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Preface
Preface
The present book is used for lecture courses Computational heat and mass
transfer, Mathematical models of turbulence and Design of special cloth given
by the authors at the University of Rostock, Germany and Don State Tech-
nical University, Russia. Each of lecture courses contains about 14 lectures.
The lecture course Compuational heat and mass transfer was written pro-
ceeding from the idea to present the complex material as easy as possible.
We considered derivation of numerical methods, particularly of the finite vol-
ume method, in details up to final expressions which can be programmed.
Turbulence is a big and a very complicated topic which is difficult to cover
within 14 lectures. We selected the material combining the main physi-
cal concepts of the turbulence with basic mathematical models necessary to
solve practical engineering problems. The course Design of special cloth uses
the material of two parts of this book partially. The material for the third
part was gathered from research projects done by the authors of this book
within some industrial projects and research works supported by different
foundations. We express our gratitude to Andreas Gross, Gunnar Jacobi
and Stefan Knochenhauer who carried out CFD calculations for the third
part of this book.
Introduction into
computational methods for
solution of transport equations
16
15
Main equations of the Computational
Chapter 1
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Heat and Mass Transfer
Chapter
Chapter 1
1
Main equations of the
Main
Main equations
Computational of
of the
equations Heat
theand Mass
Computational
Computational Heat
Transfer Heat and
and Mass
Mass
Transfer
Transfer
1.1 Fluid mechanics equations
1.1
1.1.1 Fluid mechanics
Continuity equationequations
1.1 Fluid mechanics equations
We consider
1.1.1 the case of uniform
Continuity equation density distribution D const. The con-
1.1.1 equation
tinuity Continuity equation
has the following physical meaning: The amount of liquid
We consider
flowing thevolume
into the case ofUuniform
with thedensity
surfacedistribution D const.
S is equal to the amountThe con-
of liquid
We consider the
tinuity equation
flowing case of uniform
has the following
out. Mathematically density
it can physical distribution
meaning:
be expressed D const. The
The amount of liquid
in form: con-
tinuity equation
flowing has theUfollowing
into the volume with the physical meaning: The amount of liquid
Z surface S is equal to the amount of liquid
flowing
flowing out. Mathematically it can surface
into the volume U with the S is equal
be expressed to the amount of liquid
in form:
uE nE ds D 0
flowing out. Mathematically it can be expressed in form: (1.1)
Z
Z
S
uE nE ds D 0 (1.1)
uE nE ds D components
Expressing the scalar product uE nE through 0 (1.1)
S
Z S
Expressing the scalar product uE nE through components
ux cos.nx/
Expressing the scalar Cu
product throughCcomponents
uEynE cos.ny/ uz cos.nz/ ds D 0:
Z
Z
S
u cos.nx/ C u cos.ny/ C u cos.nz/ds D 0:
x y z
and using the Gauss theorem
ux cos.nx/ Cwe get
uy cos.ny/ C uz cos.nz/ ds D 0:
S
S Z
and using the Gauss theorem
@ux we get
@uy @uz
and using the Gauss theorem C get C
we dU D 0
Z @x @y @z
Z @ux C @uy C @uz d U D 0
U
@xxUCis@u
@u @yy @uz
Since the integration volume C @z the
arbitrary, D 0 is zero only if
d Uintegral
U @x @y @z
U
@uxU is@u
Since the integration volume @uz the integral is zero only if
C arbitrary,
y
17
C D0 (1.2)
Since the integration volume
@xU is @y
arbitrary,
@z the integral is zero only if
17
In the tensor form the continuity equation reads:
17
@ui
D0 (1.3)
@xi
17
1.1.2 Classification of forces acting in a fluid
The inner forces acting in a fluid are subdivided into the
Mainbody forces
equations andComputational
of the
Lectures
surfaceonforces
computational fluid dynamics
(Fig. 1.1). Heat and Mass Transfer
Figure 1.1: Body and surface forces acting on the liquid element.
Let fE be a total body force acting on the volume U . Let us introduce
the strength of the body force as limit of the ratio of the force to the volume:
fE
FE D lim (1.4)
U !0 U
D ms 218
3
which has the unit kgs 2m m 1
kg m3
. Typical body forces are gravitational,
electrostatic or electromagnetic forces. For instance, we have the following
relations for the gravitational forces:
where fE is the gravitational force acting on a particle with volume U . The
strength of the gravitational force is equal to the gravitational acceleration:
gU kE
FE D lim . / D g kE (1.6)
U !0 U
The body forces are acting at each point of fluid in the whole domain.
PEn
pEn D lim (1.7)
S !0 S
Z
RE D pEn dS
Z
S
(1.8)
E D
M .Er pEn /dS
S
d uE
U D U FE C pEn S pEx Sx pEy Sy pEz Sz (1.9)
dt
19
Dividing r.h.s and l.h.s. by the surface of inclined face S results in:
U d uE Sx Sy Sz
FE D pEn pEx pEy pEz (1.10)
S dt S S S
Let us find
Download freethe limitat of
eBooks (1.10) at S ! 0:
bookboon.com
U S19x
lim D 0; lim D cos.nx/; (1.11)
S !0 S S !0 S
Sy Sz
lim D cos.ny/; lim D cos.nz/ (1.12)
Main equations of the Computational
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
Figure 1.2: Forces acting on the liquid element. Heat and Mass Transfer
Dividing r.h.s and l.h.s. by the surface of inclined face S results in:
U d uE Sx Sy Sz
FE D pEn pEx pEy pEz (1.10)
S dt S S S
Let us find the limit of (1.10) at S ! 0:
U Sx
lim D 0; lim D cos.nx/; (1.11)
S !0 S S !0 S
Sy Sz
lim D cos.ny/; lim D cos.nz/ (1.12)
S !0 S S !0 S
Substitution of (1.11) and (1.12) into (1.10) results in the following relation
between pEn and pEx , pEy , pEz :
E xz
pEx D Eipxx C jExy C k
E yz
pEy D Eiyx C jEpyy C k
E zz
pEz D Eizx C jEzy C kp
20
Here ij are shear stress (for instance 12 D xy ), whereas pi i are normal
stress (for instance p11 D pxx ). From moment equations (see Fig. 1.3) one
can obtain the symmetry condition for shear stresses: zy a yz a D 0 )
zy D yz and generally:
ij D j i (1.14)
The property of the surface force can be rewritten with the Gauss theorem
in the following form:
Z Z
pEn dS D pEx cos.nx/ C21pEy cos.ny/ C pEz cos.nz/ dS
Z
S S
@pEx @pEy @pEz
D C C dU
@x @y @z
U
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
The second law (1.16) takes the form: 21
Z Z Z
d uE @pEx @pEy @pEz
d U D FE d U C C C dU
dt @x @y @z
pEn dS D pEx cos.nx/ C pEy cos.ny/ C pEz cos.nz/ dS
Z
S S
@pEx @pEy @pEz Main equations of the Computational
D fluid dynamics
Lectures on computational C C dU Heat and Mass Transfer
@x @y @z
U
Z Z Z
d uE E @pEx @pEy @pEz
d U D F d U C C C dU
dt @x @y @z
Z
U U U
d uE @ E
p @ E
p @ E
p
FE
x y z
C C dU D 0
dt @x @y @z
U
Since the volume d U is arbitrary, the l.h.s. in the last formulae is zero only
if:
d uE 1 @ E
p @ E
p @ E
p
D FE C
x y z
C C (1.17)
dt @x @y @z
The stresses in (1.17) are not known. They can be found from the generalized
Newton hypothesis
0 1 0 1
pxx xy xz p 0 0
@ xy pyy yz A D @ 0 p 0 A C 2Sij (1.18)
xz yz pzz 0 0 p
@ux 1 @ux @uy 1 @ux @uz
S11 D Sxx D I S12 D Sxy D C I S13 D Sxz D C
@x 2 @y @x 2 @z @x
@uy 1 @uy @uz
S21 D S12 ; S22 D Syy D ; S23 D Syz D C
@y 2 @z @y
@uz
S31 D S13 ; S32 D S23 ; S33 D Szz D
@z
The liquids obeying (1.18) are referred to as the Newtonian liquids.
The normal stresses can be expressed through the pressure p:
22
@ux @uy @uz
pxx D p C 2 ; pyy D p C 2 ; pzz D p C 2
@x @y @z
The sum of three normal stresses doesn’t depend on the choice of the coor-
dinate system and is equal to the pressure taken with sign minus:
22
dux @ @ux @ @uy @ux
D Fx C p C 2 C C
dt @x @x @y @x @y
The sum of three normal stresses doesn’t depend on the choice of the coor-
dinate system and is equal to the pressure taken with sign minus:
Main equations of the Computational
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
pxx C pyy C pzz Heat and Mass Transfer
D p (1.19)
3
The last expression is the definition of the pressure in the viscous flow: The
pressure is the sum of three normal stresses taken with the sign minus. Sub-
stitution of the Newton hypothesis (1.18) into (1.17) gives (using the first
equation as a sample):
dux @ @ux @ @uy @ux
D Fx C p C 2 C C
dt @x @x @y @x @y
@ @ux @uz
C C D
@z @z @x
2
@p @ ux @2 ux @2 ux
D Fx C C C C
@x @x 2 @y 2 @z 2
@ @ux @uy @uz
C C C
@x @x @y @z
The last term in the last formula is zero because of the continuity equation.
Doing similar transformation with resting two equations in y and z direc-
tions, one can obtain the following equation, referred to as the Navier-Stokes
equation:
d uE 1
D FE rp C E
u (1.20)
dt
The full or material substantial derivative of the velocity vector ddtuE is the
Excellent Economics and Business programmes at:
acceleration of the fluid particle. It consists of two parts: local acceleration
and convective acceleration:
d uE @E
u @E
u @E
u @E
u
D C ux C uy C uz
dt „ƒ‚…
@t
„
@x
ƒ‚
@y @z
…
local acceleration convective acceleration
23
“The perfect start
of a successful,
international career.”
CLICK HERE
to discover why both socially
and academically the University
of Groningen is one of the best
places for a student to be
www.rug.nl/feb/education
The full or material substantial derivative of the velocity vector ddtuE is the
acceleration of the fluid particle. It consists of two parts: local acceleration
and convective acceleration:
d uE @E
u @E
u @E
u @E
u
D C ux C uy C uz
dt „ƒ‚…
@t
„
@x
ƒ‚
@y @z
…
local acceleration convective acceleration
The boundary conditions are enforced for velocity components and pressure
at the boundary of the computational domain. The no slip condition ux D
uy D uz D 0 is enforced at the solid body boundary. The boundary condition
for the pressure at the body surface can directly be derived from the Navier
Stokes equation. For instance, if y D 0 corresponds to the wall, the Navier
Stokes Equation takes the form at the boundary:
@p @ 2 ux
D Fx C 2
@x @y
@p @2 uy
D Fy C 2
@y @y
@p @2 uz
D Fz C 2
@z @y
Very often the last term in the last formulae is neglected because second
spatial derivatives of the velocity are not known at the wall boundary.
Till now, the existence of the solution of Navier Stokes has been not proven by
mathematicians. Also, it is not clear whether the solution is smooth or allows
singularity.
Download free The Clay
eBooks Mathematics Institute has called the Navier–Stokes
at bookboon.com
existence and smoothness problems one of the seven most important open
24
24
@x @y
@p @2 uy
D Fy C 2
@y @y
Main equations of the Computational
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
@p @2 uz Heat and Mass Transfer
D Fz C 2
@z @y
Very often the last term in the last formulae is neglected because second
spatial derivatives of the velocity are not known at the wall boundary.
Till now, the existence of the solution of Navier Stokes has been not proven by
mathematicians. Also, it is not clear whether the solution is smooth or allows
singularity. The Clay Mathematics Institute has called the Navier–Stokes
existence and smoothness problems one of the seven most important open
problems in mathematics and has offered one million dollar prize for its
solution. 24
From
R the other side the change of the inner energy in the volume U is equal
to U cp @t@ T .x; t/d U , where T is the temperature, cp is the specific heat
capacity and is the density. Equating this change to (1.26) we get:
Z Z Z
@
cp T .x; t/d U D r q.x; t/d U C f .x; t/d U (1.27)
U @t U U
Z Z
@
cp T .x; t/ r .rT .x; t// d U D f .x; t/d U (1.29)
! @t U
Neumann condition:
Dirichlet condition:
26
Sweden
www.teknat.umu.se/english
Chapter
Chapter 2
2
Finite difference method
Finite
Finite difference
difference method
method
2.1 One dimensional case
2.1 One dimensional
Let us consider the finite difference case
method for the one dimensional case.
2.1
Let '.x/One dimensional
is the function defined in thecase
range Œ0; a along the x axis. The
section Œ0; a is subdivided in a set of points xifor
Let us consider the finite difference method . Forthethe
one dimensionaldistri-
homogeneous case.
Chapter 2
Let us
Let '.x/
bution
Let '.x/
consider
xi is
D the
is the
the finite
.i function
function
difference
1/I i Ddefined
defined in
method
1; N , inD the range
a=.N
the
for
1/Œ0;
range Œ0;
the one
a Fig.
(see
a along
dimensional
the x axis. case.
along2.1).
the x axis.
The
The
section Œ0; a is subdivided in a set of points xi . For the homogeneous distri-
section xŒ0;
bution a is subdivided in a set of points xi . For
i D .i 1/I i D 1; N , D a=.N 1/ (see the
Fig.homogeneous
2.1). distri-
bution xi D .i 1/I i D 1; N , D a=.N 1/ (see Fig. 2.1).
Finite difference method
'.x/ D ax 2 C bx C c
within the section Œxi 1 ; xi C1 .
Without loss of generality we assume xi 1 D 0. The coefficient c can be
obtained from the condition:
'.0/ D 'i 1 D c
Other two coefficients a and b are determined from the conditions:
@' 1 3
D 2'i C1 C 3'i 6'i 1 C 'i 2 C O x (2.7)
@x 6x
Download free ieBooks at bookboon.com
for the Backward Difference Scheme,
28
@' 1 3
D 'i C2 C 6'i C1 3'i 2'i 1 C O x (2.8)
@x i 6x
If the polynomial of the 3rd order '.x/ D ax 3 C bx 2 C cx C d is applied, we
get:
Lectures on@' 1 fluid dynamics
computational 3 Finite dierence method
D 2'i C1 C 3'i 6'i 1 C 'i 2 C O x (2.7)
@x i 6x
for the Backward Difference Scheme,
@' 1 3
D 'i C2 C 6'i C1 3'i 2'i 1 C O x (2.8)
@x i 6x
for the Forward Difference Scheme and
@' 1 4
D 'i C2 C 8'i C1 8'i 1 C 'i 2 C O x (2.9)
@x i 12x
for the Central Difference Scheme. As seen the accuracy order is sufficiently
improved by consideration of more adjacent points.
The second derivatives are:
2
@ ' 1 2
D 'i C1 2'i C 'i 1 C O x (2.10)
@x 2 i x 2
for the polynomial of the second order and
@2 ' 1 4
D 'i C2 C 16'i C1 30'i C 16'i 1 'i 2 C O x
@x 2 i 12x 2
(2.11)
29
American online
LIGS University
is currently enrolling in the
Interactive Online BBA, MBA, MSc,
DBA and PhD programs:
for the polynomial of the fourth order. The formula (2.10) can also be ob-
tained using consequently CDS
2
@ ' 1 @' @'
D (2.12)
@x 2 i x @x i C1=2 @x i 1=2
where i C 1=2 and i 1=2 are intermediate points (see Fig. 2.1). Using again
the CDS for the derivatives at intermediate points:
@' 'i C1 'i
D (2.13)
@x i C1=2 x
@' 'i 'i 1
D (2.14)
@x i 1=2 x
we obtain (2.10).
The function ' at a point .xi ; yj / is 'ij . The CDS approximation of the
derivative on x at this point is:
@' 'i C1j 'i 1j
D 30
@x ij 2x
whereas on y is:
@' 'ij C1 'ij 1
D
@y ij
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com 2y
30
2.3 Time derivatives. Explicit versus implicit
Let the unsteady partial differential equation is written in the form:
@'
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics 'i C1j 'i 1j Finite dierence method
D
@x ij 2x
whereas on y is:
@' 'ij C1 'ij 1
D
@y ij 2y
@g
D G.g; t/ (2.15)
@t
The solution is known at the time instant n. The task is to find the solution
at n C 1 time instant. Using forward difference scheme we get:
2.4 Exercises
1. Using the CDS find the derivative
@ @'
.x/ D ::: (2.19)
@x @x i
@'
.x D 0/ D C1
@x
'.x D 0/ D C2
@' @2 '
˛ C 2 D f .x; t/
@t @x
with the following boundary conditions:
@'
.x D 0/ D C1
@x
'.x D 0/ D C2
32
Chapter
Chapter 3
Stability 3and artificial viscosity
Stability
of and
numerical
Stability artificial
artificial viscosity
and methods viscosity
of
of numerical
numerical methods
methods
3.1 Artificial viscosity
3.1us consider
Let Artificial
the genericviscosity
linear equation:
3.1 Artificial viscosity
Let us consider the generic linear @ equation: @
Let us consider the generic linear C u D0
@t equation: @x
@ @
@ C u @ D 0
@t C u @x D 0
The numerical upwind scheme @t (UDS) @x is:
8̂ u n u n
i xscheme
The numerical<upwind i1
(UDS)u > 0is:
TheinC1
numerical
in upwind scheme (UDS) is:
D 8̂ u n u n
t
8̂
:̂
< u
in
n u
uiC1
i1
n n u>0
i u
x i1 i
inC1 in < x u> <0
n D
x
inC1
ti
We consider
t :̂ the
Donly n
uiC1 case
uinu > 0:
:̂ uiC1 n
uin u<0
nC1x x n
u<0
We consider only the i i u > 0:u in u in1
case
We consider only thet case uD > 0: x
u>0 (3.1)
nC1 n
Taylor expansionsinC1 of the function
in inn t/uin time
u .x; n
in1 and space gives
i D u u u>0 (3.1)
t i D ˇ i x i 1 ˇ u>0 (3.1)
t ˇn x
@ .x; @ 2
t 2 ˇn
Taylor expansions of nC1 the function
n
Dfunction
i C .x; ˇ t C t/ in time andˇ Cspace gives
Taylor expansions of i the ˇ
@t ˇin t/ in@ttime
2 ˇ :::
2 ˇin space gives
and (3.2)
ˇ@ ˇˇ @2 t 2 ˇˇ
n ˇˇn t C 2 ˇn 2 ˇˇn C
inC1 ˇ @ ˇt ˇˇ 2 :::
n
D C
n nC1nD in C ˇ@t ˇˇ t C @t 2 ˇ 2 x
@ @ (3.2)
i D i i 1 C ˇi x C @x i CC
2 ˇi2
::: ::: (3.2)
@x ˇˇ@t @t 22 ˇˇin1
i (3.3)
in1i
@ ˇˇˇn @22 ˇˇˇn x 22
n
in Dand n
i 1 C @into ˇ x Cresults @ ˇ in x C :::
C @x ˇˇˇi 1(3.1) x C @x 22 ˇˇˇi 1
Substitution of (3.2) (3.3)
i D in1(3.3) 2 C ::: (3.3)
@xˇn i 1 ˇ @x i 1 2
@ ˇˇ ˇˇ t
n
@233
ˇ C D
@t i @t 2 ˇi 2
ˇ 33 ˇn
u @ ˇˇn 33 @2 ˇˇ x 2
D C x C
@x ˇi 1 @x 2 ˇi 1 2
(3.4)
x
ˇ ˇ ˇn ˇn
@ ˇˇn @ ˇˇn @2 ˇˇ @3 ˇˇ x 2
D x C :::;
@x ˇi 1 @x ˇi @x 2 ˇi @x 3 ˇi 2
ˇn ˇn ˇn (3.5)
@2 ˇˇat bookboon.com
Download free eBooks @2 ˇˇ @3 ˇˇ
D x :::
@x 2 ˇ @x 2 ˇ
i 1 @x 3 ˇ
i i 33
ˇ ˇ ˇn ˇn
@ ˇˇn @ ˇˇn @2 ˇˇ @3 ˇˇ x 2
D x C :::;
@x ˇi1 @x ˇi @x 2 ˇi @x 3 ˇi 2
ˇn ˇn ˇn (3.5)
@2 ˇˇ @2 ˇˇ @3 ˇˇ
D x :::
@x 2 ˇi1 @x 2 ˇi @x 3 ˇi
ˇ ˇn 2 ˇn ˇn 2
u @ ˇˇn @2 ˇˇ @ ˇˇ @3 ˇˇ x
D x x C C ::: (3.6)
@x ˇi @x 2 ˇi @x 2 ˇi @x 3 ˇi
x
x 2
Finally we have:
ˇ ˇn
@ ˇˇn @2 ˇˇ t
C 2ˇ D
@t ˇi @t i 2
ˇ ˇn
u @ ˇˇn @2 ˇˇ x 2
D C :::
@x ˇi @x 2 ˇi 2
x (3.7)
x
Compare noweBooks
Download free with the original equation:
Compare now with atthe
bookboon.com
original equation:
@ @34
@ D u @
@t D u @x
@t @x
The additional term
The additional term
!
!
@ @ ux ut @2
@t
D u @x C 2
1 x @x 2
C :::
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Stability and articial viscosity of numerical methods
Compare now with the original equation:
@ @
D u
@t @x
The additional term
!
ux ut @2
2
1 x @x 2
where is the diffusion coefficient. Therefore, the error term can be in-
terpreted as the numerical or artificial diffusion with the diffusion coeffi-
cient ux
2
.1 ut
x
/ caused by errors of equation approximation. The pres-
ence of the artificial diffusion is a serious drawback of numerical methods. It
could be minimised by increase of the resolution x ! 0.
@ @
Cu D0 (3.11)
@t @x
35
Maastricht
University is
the best specialist
university in the
Visit us and find out why we are the best! Netherlands
(Elsevier)
Master’s Open Day: 22 February 2014
www.mastersopenday.nl
u t n
inC1 in D . in1 /
x i
u t u t n
inC1 D in .1 /C
x x i 1
ut
Let us introduce the Courant Friedrich Levy parameter c D x
:
in D "
time instant n C 1:
time instant n C 2:
time instant n C 3:
time instant n C N :
36
.inCN
CN / D cN "
::::::::::::::::::
.inCN
CN / D c "
N
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Stability and articial viscosity of numerical methods
::::::::::::::::::
c<1 (3.14)
The condition (3.14) is the Courant Friedrich Levy criterion of the stability
of explicit numerical schemes. If the velocity is changed within the compu-
tational domain, the maximum velocity umax is taken instead of u in for-
mula (3.14). Physically the condition umax
x
t
< 1 means that the maximum
displacement of the fluid particle within the time step Œt; t C t does not
exceed the cell size x. The CFL parameter c can be reduced by decrease
of t (not by increase of x!).
3.3 Exercise
The field of the velocity component ux is given as ux;ij D exp...ix
0:5/2 C .jy 0:5/2 /.
Calculate uy;ij from continuity equation (1.3) and the t satisfying the CFL
criterion.
Chapter
Chapter 4
4
Simple explicit time advance
Simple
Simple explicit
scheme time
for solution
explicit advance
timeof the
advance
scheme
Navier for
for solution
scheme Stokes of
of the
Equation
solution the
Navier
Navier Stokes
Stokes Equation
Equation
4.1 Theory
4.1unsteady
The Theory
term of the Navier Stokes Equation
4.1 Theory
The unsteady term of@uthe i @ui uStokes
Navier j 1 @p Equation@ @ui
The unsteady term of@tthe Navier D C (4.1)
@xj Stokes @x Equation
i @xj @xj
@ui @ui uj 1 @p @ @ui
is written in explicit @u form:D @u u 1 @p C @ @x @ui (4.1)
@ti D @xi j j @xi C @x j j (4.1)
@t j n n @xi
@x n @xj @xj n
is written in explicitnC1 form: n
ıui uj 1 ıp ı ıui
u
is written in explicit form:
i D u i C t C (4.2)
ıx nj n
@xi
n
ıxj ıxj
n
ı u nC1
D u n
C t ıuin ujn 1 ıp n C @
ı ıui
(4.2)
where ıxj is thenC1 i approximation
i
n
ıu
of theıx
u
i derivative
j 1
ıp
@x ı ıu
. ıx
Let usniapply the diver-
ıx
ui ı D ui C t j i C
@xj j j (4.2)
gence operator : ıxj @xi ıxj ıxj
ı ıxi @
where ıxj is the approximation of the derivative @xj . Let us apply the diver-
where ıxıj isıuthe
nC1approximation
ı
ıu n
ıof theıu derivative
n n
u 1
@
@xjn
ıp . Let usı apply
ıuni the diver-
gence operator i ıxi : i i j
ıD C t C (4.3)
gence operator ıxi ıxi : ıxi ıxi ıx j @x i ıxj ıxj
ıunC1
inC1 ıuni ı ıuni ujn n 1 ıp n ı ıuni
ıuıx D ıu n C t ı n ıu n
ıui uj i D1 ıp n C ı ıuis n (4.3)
Let uni is the i divergence
i D ıxii Cfree field,
t ıx i.e. 0. The task
i ıxj ıxi @xi C ıxj ıxji
to find(4.3)
the
velocity fieldıx ati the time ıxi moment ıxi n C 1ıxwhich j n is
@xalso
i divergence
ıxj ıxj free
ıui
Let uni is the divergence free field, i.e. ıu n
ıxii
D 0. The task is to find the
Let uni isfield
velocity theatdivergence
the time moment ıunnC1
free field, i Ci.e.1 which
ıxi
Dis 0.
also The task
divergence is to
freefind the
velocity field at the time moment n C 1 Dwhich
0 is also divergence free (4.4)
ıxi
ıunC1inC1
Substituting (4.4) into (4.3) one ıu obtains: D0 (4.4)
ıx i i
D 0 (4.4)
n n ıx i n n
Substituting (4.4) into ıu
ı (4.3)i one u 1 ıp
j obtains: 39 C ı ıui D 0
Substituting (4.4) ıx into
(4.3) one obtains: (4.5)
i ıxj @xi ıxj ıxj
Expressing (4.5) with respect to the pressure 39 results in the Poisson equation:
39
" #
ı2pn ı 2 uni ujn ı 2 ıuni
D C (4.6)
@xi2 ıxj ıxi ıxi ıxj ıxj
The algorithm for time-advancing is as follows:
iii) Calculation
Download free eBooksof
at the pressure
bookboon.com p n from the Poisson equation (4.6)
In the following sections we consider the algorithm in details for the two
ıxi ıxj @xi ıxj ıxj
Expressing (4.5) with respect to the pressure results in the Poisson equation:
" # explicit time advance scheme for
Simple
2 n 2 n n 2 n
ı p
Lectures on computational fluid D
dynamics
ı u i uj ı ıu i solution of the Navier Stokes Equation
C (4.6)
@xi2 ıxj ıxi ıxi ıxj ıxj
The algorithm for time-advancing is as follows:
In the following sections we consider the algorithm in details for the two
dimensional case.
@' @'
Cu D0 (4.7)
@t @x
with u > 0. A simple explicit, forward time, central difference scheme for
this equation may be written as
1 1
'inC1 D 'in c.Œ'in C .'inC1 'in /
Œ'in1 C .'in 'in1 /
/ D
2 2
1 n 1
D 'in c.Œ'in 'in1
C Œ'iC1 'in
Œ'in 'in1
/ (4.8)
2 2
where c D utx
is the CFL parameter.40The term cŒ'in 'in1 is the diffusive
1st order upwind contribution. The term c. 12 Œ'inC1 'in 12 Œ'in 'in1 / is the
anti-diffusive component. With TVD (total variation diminishing) schemes
the anti-diffusive component is limited in order to avoid instabilities and
maintain boundness 0 < ' < 1:
1 1
'inC1 D 'in c.Œ'in 'in1 C Œ'inC1 'in east
n
Œ'in 'in1 west
n
/ (4.9)
2 2
where are limiters. Limiters functions for TVD schemes are given in ta-
ble 4.1.
central 1
upwind 0
1 1
'inC1 D 'in c.Œ'in 'in1 C Œ'inC1 'in east
n
Œ'in 'in1 west
n
/ (4.9)
2 2
Simple explicit
where are limiters. Limiters functions for TVD schemes timein
are given advance
ta- scheme for
Lectures
ble 4.1.on computational fluid dynamics solution of the Navier Stokes Equation
central 1
upwind 0
Roe minimod D max.0; mi n.r; 1//
Roe superbee D max.0; mi n.2r; 1/; mi n.r; 2//
rCmod.r/
Van Leer D 1Cmod.r/
Branley and Jones D max.0; mi n.2r; 1//
'n ' n
Here r D . @' /n =. @'
@x west
/n , . @'
@x east
/n D xiC1
@x east
i
iC1 xi
. The mixed upwind and cen-
tral difference scheme are used in Sec. 4.4 for approximation of the convective
terms with the limiter (4.14).
41
n n
. @p / . @p
n n
. @p / . @p
@x E
/
@x W @y N
/
@y S
n
Tx;E n
Tx;W n
Ty;N n
Ty;S
C D C
2x 2y 2x 2y
or
N pP pSS
n n n n
n
pEE pP
n n
pP pW
n pN pP
2x
2x
W
2y
2y
n
Tx;E n
Tx;W n
Ty;N n
Ty;S
C D C D QPH
2x 2y 2x 2y
where
This equation (4.11) has involves nodes which are 2 apart (see also [3])!
It is a discretized Poisson equation on a grid twice as coarse as the basic
one but the
Download freeequations split into four unconnected systems, one with i and j
eBooks at bookboon.com
both even, one with i even and j odd, one 41 with i odd and j even, and
one with both odd. Each of these systems gives a different solution. For
a flow with a uniform pressure field, the checkerboard pressure distribution
shown in Fig. 4.2 satisfies these equations and could be produced. However,
l
where
This equation (4.11) has involves nodes which are 2 apart (see also [3])!
It is a discretized Poisson equation on a grid twice as coarse as the basic
one but the equations split into four unconnected systems, one with i and j
both even, one with i even and j odd, one with i odd and j even, and
one with both odd. Each of these systems gives a different solution. For
a flow with a uniform pressure field, the checkerboard pressure distribution
shown in Fig. 4.2 satisfies these equations and could be produced. However,
the pressure gradient is not affected and the velocity field may be smooth.
42
42
dissertation?
@u
D
@u u
1 @p
y
C
@ @u
y j y
(4.13)
@t @xj @y @xj @xj
Get in-depth feedback & advice from experts in your
topic area.grid
The staggered Find is
oututilized
what youbelow.
can do to improve
the quality of your dissertation!
ıuni ujn
4.4 Approximation
Get Help Now of ıxj
The approximation of the convective term is a very critical point. For faster
flows or larger time steps, the discretization shall be closer to an upwinding
approach [4]. Following to [4] we implement a smooth transition between
centered differencing and upwinding using a parameter 2 Œ0; 1. It is defined
Go to www.helpmyassignment.co.uk for more info
as
ıuni ujn
4.4 Approximation of ıxj
The approximation of the convective term is a very critical point. For faster
flows or larger time steps, the discretization shall be closer to an upwinding
approach [4]. Following to [4] we implement a smooth transition between
centered differencing and upwinding using a parameter 2 Œ0; 1. It is defined
as
The value of gamma is the maximum fraction of a cells which information can
travel in one time step, multiplied by 1:2, and capped by 1. The factor of 1:2
is taken from the experience that often times tending a bit more towards
upwinding can be advantageous for accuracy [5].
D 0 corresponds to the central difference scheme (CDS) whereas D 1
results in the upwind difference scheme (UDS).
@ux ux @ux uy
4.4.1 Approximation of 44@x
@y
D ux @u
@x
x
uy @u
@y
x
46
ı ıunni
4.5
4.5 Approximation
Approximation of
ıof iıx
ıu n ı ıui
ıxj
4.5 Approximation of ıxj ıxj ıxjj ıxj
The second derivative is calculated using the Central Difference Scheme
The second
The secondderivative
derivative is calculated
is calculated using using the Central
the Central DifferenceDifference
Scheme Scheme
(CDS):
(CDS):
(CDS):
C 1;
ux .i 1; / j / x .i;
2u .i;
C uj / C u .i u1; j /j Cu1/ .i; j xC.i;1/
j / 2u
uxxx.i;.i; j / C u .i; j 1/
.i;jj/ /DDuxu.ixC
Dxx.i; .i Cj1; / 2ujxx/.i;
j 2u jx/.iCu1;xx j.i/ C
1; 2u
j / C uxx .i;
x .i; j C 1/ C2u .i;j j/1/C uxx .i; j 1/
Dx .i; j / D
D
2x
2 C y2 y22
2x x y
.iy C
uyu .i 1; / j 2u
Cj1; /y .i; C uj /.iCu1; j.i/ u1;
2ujy/.i; j /j Cu1/
y .i; 2u
.i; j C.i;1/ C2u
j / j j/1/
u .i;.i; C u .i; j 1/
D .i;jj/ /DD uy .i C 1; j / 2u
Dyy.i; 2 y 2
.i; jy/ C uyy .i C 1; j / C uyy .i; j yC21/ 2uyyy .i; j / C uyy .i; j 1/
Dy .i; j / D x C y 2
2xx yy2
4.6 Calculation of the r.h.s. for the Poisson
4.6 Calculation
4.6 equation
Calculation of the r.h.s. for the Poisson
(4.6) of the r.h.s. for the Poisson
equation (4.6)
The r.h.s. equation
of (4.6) is (4.6)
The r.h.s. ıof2 u(4.6)
n n is 2
The r.h.s. of (4.6)
i uj is ı ıuni @Hx @Hy @Dx @Dy
C D C C C
ıxıj 2ıx n
ui u n ıxi ıxj ıx
2 j @x
n @y @x @y
ı 2 uni ujn ı2 ıuni @Hx @Hy @Dx @Dy
at ithej point
The derivatives
ı ıu
C (i,j) of the ipressure
D x C @H
y C x C@H y @D @D
ıxj ıxi C ıx i ıxj ıxj
D @xstorage
C @y(designated
C @x C as X in
@y
ıxj ıxi usingıxCDS
Fig. 4.3) are calculated i ıxj ıxj @x @y @x @y
The derivatives at the point (i,j) of the pressure storage (designated as X in
The derivatives at the point (i,j) of the pressure storage (designated as X in
Fig.@H4.3) areHcalculated using CDS
x .i; j / Hx .i 1; j / @Dx Dx .i; j / Dx .i 1; j /
Fig. 4.3)
x
jij are
D calculated using CDS ; jij D ;
@x x @x x
@Hyx
@H HH x .i;
y .i; j /Hy .i;
j/ Hjx .i 1;@Djy/ @DxDy .i; j /D
1/ xD
.i; j /j
y .i; D1/x .i 1; j /
@HxjijjijDD H x .i; j / Hx .i ;1; j /j;ij@D
D x jij D Dx .i; j / Dx .i 1; j / ;
@y j
@x ij D y x @y ; j
@x ij D y x ;
@x x @x x
Hy .i; j / Hy .i; j 1/ @Dy Dy .i; j / Dy .i; j 1/
4.7 @H
@HyySolution j / the
jij D Hy .i; of j 1/ ; @Dequation
Poisson
Hy .i; j / Dy .i; j 1/
y jij D Dy .i; (4.6)
j
@y ij D y ; j
@y ij D y
@y y @y y
The numerical solution of the Poisson equation is discussed in [3].
4.7 Solution
4.7 Update
Solution of the
the Poisson equation
equation (4.6)
4.8 the of Poisson
velocity field (4.6)
The numerical solution of the Poisson equation is discussed in [3].
Thevelocity
The numerical
field solution
is updatedofaccording
the Poisson equation is discussed in [3].
to formula
4.8
4.8
unC1
x
Update
Update the
the velocity
velocity field
field
.i; j / D unx .i; j /C t .Hxn .i; j /CDxn .i; j /.p n .i C1; j /p n .i; j //=x /
nC1
u
The
y .i; j / D uynfield
velocity .i; j / C n
isupdated C Dyn .i; j /
t .Hy .i; j /according
n
.i; j C 1/ p n .i; j //=y /
to.pformula
The velocity field is updated according to formula
47
unC1 .i; j / D unnx .i; j /C t .Hxnn .i; j /CDxnn .i; j /.p nn .i C1; j /p nn .i; j //=x /
unC1
x
x .i; j / D ux .i; j /C t .Hx .i; j /CDx .i; j /.p .i C1; j /p .i; j //=x /
uynC1 .i; j / D un .i; j / C .H n .i; j / C D n .i; j / .p n .i; j C 1/ p n .i; j //= /
uynC1 .i; j / D uyyn .i; j / C tt .Hyyn .i; j / C Dyyn .i; j / .p n .i; j C 1/ p n .i; j //=yy /
47
47
47
Simple explicit time advance scheme for
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics solution of the Navier Stokes Equation
1 1
uxx.i.i 1=2;
u 1=2;j jCC D D.ux.u
1=2/
1=2/ / Cj /uxC
.i;xj.i; C 1/
.i;ujx .i; C u1/x .iCu1;
jC j /C1;
x .i uxj.i/ C uxj.iC1//;
1; 1; j C 1//;
4 4
1
uxx.i.i 1=2;
u 1=2;j j1=2/ D D.u1x.u
.i; j / C ux .i 1; j / C ux .i; j 1/ C ux .i 1; j 1//;
1=2/ 4 4 x .i; j / C ux .i 1; j / C ux .i; j 1/ C ux .i 1; j 1//;
1
uy .i C 1=2; j 1=2/ D .u1y .i; j / C uy .i C 1; j / C uy .i; j 1/ C uy .i C 1; j 1//;
uy .i C 1=2; j 1=2/ D 4 .uy .i; j / C uy .i C 1; j / C uy .i; j 1/ C uy .i C 1; j 1//;
1 4
uy .i 1=2; j 1=2/ D .u1y .i; j / C uy .i 1; j / C uy .i; j 1/ C uy .i 1; j 1//;
uy .i 1=2; j 1=2/ D 4 .uy .i; j / C uy .i 1; j / C uy .i; j 1/ C uy .i 1; j 1//;
ux .i 1=2; j C41=2/ ux .i 1=2; j 1=2/
!z .i; j / D u .i 1=2; j C 1=2/ u .i 1=2; j 1=2/
x y x
!z .i; j / D
uy .i C 1=2; j 1=2/ uy .i 1=2; yj 1=2/
uy .i C 1=2; j 1=2/x uy .i 1=2; j 1=2/
x
48
48
48
Splitting schemes for solution of
Chapter 5
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics multidimensional problems
Chapter
Chapter 5
Splitting 5schemes for solution
Splitting
of schemes
schemes for
multidimensional
Splitting solution
forproblems
solution
of
of multidimensional
multidimensional problems
problems
5.1 Splitting in spatial directions. Alternat-
5.1 ing direction
Splitting implicit
in spatial (ADI) approach
directions. Alternat-
5.1 Splitting in spatial directions. Alternat-
ing direction
Let us consider implicit
the two dimensional unsteady(ADI) approach
heat conduction equation:
ing direction implicit 2 (ADI)
2
approach
@
Let us consider the two dimensional
@unsteady @ heat conduction equation:
Let us consider the two dimensional D unsteady C 2heat conduction equation: (5.1)
@t @x 2 @y
@ @2
Crank @2
We use implicit scheme proposed @ D by
2 C and 2 Nicolson and CDS for spatial (5.1)
derivatives: @t D @@x2 C @@y2 (5.1)
We use implicit scheme proposed @t @x 2 and
by Crank @y 2 Nicolson and CDS for spatial
We use implicit schemeproposed by Crank
derivatives: and Nicolson and CDS for spatial
nC1 n 2 n 2 n 2 nC1 2 nC1
derivatives: @ @ @ @
D C C C (5.2)
t 2 @x 2 @y 2
@x 2 @y 2
nC1 n @2 n @2 n @2 nC1 @2 nC1
nC1 n D 2 n C 2 n n C 2 nC1 C (5.2)
t 2 @n 2 @@y
iC1;j
2 2@i;jn 2 n
@xC i 1;j @2@y
nC1
2
D 2@ @x 2 C C C (5.2)
t 2 @x 2@x D @y 2 @x 2 @y 2 (5.3)
2 n i;j n
.x/ n
2
ı2 n inC1;j 2i;j
n
C in1;j
D (5.5)
ıx 2 .x/2
n n n
ı2 n i;j C1 2i;j C i;j 1
D (5.6)
ıy 2 .y/2
t ı 2 t ı 2 nC1 t ı 2 t ı 2
1 1 D 1C 1C nC
2 ıx 2 2 ıy 2 2 ıx 2 2 ıy 2
.t /2 ı 2 ı 2 nC1 n
C
4 ıx 2 ıy 2
(5.7)
It can be shown that the resulting method is of the second order of accuracy
and unconditionally stable.
@u 50
D C u C Du C P (5.10)
@t
Here
1 nC1 D 1 C (5.9)
2 ıy 2 2 ıx 2
It can be shown that the resulting method is of the second order of accuracy
Splitting schemes for solution of
Lectures on computationalstable.
and unconditionally fluid dynamics multidimensional problems
@u
D C u C Du C P (5.10)
@t
Here
solving sequentially. The sense of this splitting is that the numerical solution
of partial problems (*)-(***) is simpler and more stable than that of the
whole problem. The disadvantage of this procedure is that it is applicable to
only unsteady problem formulation. Another disadvantage is the low order
of accuracy with respect to time derivative approximation. The order of time
derivative approximations can be derived using the sample with two physical
processes described by operators L1 and L2 :
@u
D L1 .u/ C L2 .u/ (5.13)
@t
The splitting of (5.10) results in two steps procedure:
@u
D L1 .u /; u j t Dtn D un
@t (5.14)
@unC1
D L2 .unC1 /; unC1 j t Dtn D u
@t
where
The accuracy of the final solution unC1 is of the first order in time.
Very often the diffusion step is treated implicitly. This is done to diminish
51 process. Otherwise, the stability
the time step restriction for the diffusion
requires t to be proportional to the spacial discretization squared, if a pure
explicit scheme is applied. The semi implicit scheme for the two dimensional
Navier Stokes equation reads:
The solutions ux;y are used then for the diffusion process which is
treated implicitly:
2
u
x ux ı ux ı 2 u
x
D C (5.18)
t ıx 2 ıy 2
uy uy ı 2 uy ı 2 uy
D C (5.19)
t ıx 2 ıy 2
ıunC1
x
ıuynC1
C D0 (5.22)
ıx ıy
Applying the operator r to the equations (5.20) and (5.21) we get the Poisson
equation for the pressure:
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
ı 2 p nC1 ı 2 p nC1 1 52ıu
x
ıuy Click on(5.23)
the ad to read more
C D C
ıx 2 ıy 2 t ıx ıy
52
ux unx ıun un ıux uy
D x x (5.16)
t ıx ıy
uy uyn ıuyn unx ıuyn uyn Splitting schemes for solution of
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics D multidimensional
(5.17) problems
t ıx ıy
The solutions ux;y are used then for the diffusion process which is
treated implicitly:
2
u
x ux ı ux ı 2 u
x
D C (5.18)
t ıx 2 ıy 2
uy uy ı 2 uy ı 2 uy
D C (5.19)
t ıx 2 ıy 2
ıunC1
x
ıuynC1
C D0 (5.22)
ıx ıy
Applying the operator r to the equations (5.20) and (5.21) we get the Poisson
equation for the pressure:
ı 2 p nC1 ı 2 p nC1 1 ıu
x
ıuy
C D C (5.23)
ıx 2 ıy 2 t ıx ıy
@u @F .u/
C D0 (5.24)
@t @x
We introduce the following designations:
@F
AD
@u
2
u.t C / D u.t/ C u t .t/ C u t t .t/ C O. 3 /
2 (5.26)
2
D u.t/ Fx .t/ C .A.t/Fx .t//x C O. 3 /
2
A difficulty arising in the LW approach is the computation of the operator A.
One can easy derive that the Lax Wendroff scheme results in the solution of
the equation:
unC1 un @F n @ n @F
n
C D A
@x 2 @x @x
53
RUN FASTER.
RUN LONGER.. READ MORE & PRE-ORDER TODAY
RUN EASIER… WWW.GAITEYE.COM
Chapter 6
Chapter 6
Finite Volume Method
Finite Volume Method
Finite Volume Method
6.1 Transformation of the Navier-Stokes Equa-
6.1 tions in the Finite
Transformation Volume
of the Method Equa-
Navier-Stokes
6.1 Transformation of the Navier-Stokes Equa-
tions
The Navier Stokesin the Finite Volume Method
equation
tions in the Finite Volume Method
The Navier Stokes @ui equation
@.ui uj / 1 @p @ @
The Navier Stokes C D Fi C ui (6.1)
@t equation@xj @xi @xj @xj
@ui @.ui uj / 1 @p @ @
@u
is fulfilled within@teach C @.u
mesh u / D Fi 1 @p C @j U)@x
@in uthe
i (6.1)
i @xi j j element (finite
@x volume
@x integral sense.
C D Fi i C j ui (6.1)
For that it is integrated
@t over
@xj the volume U
@xi : @xj @xj
is fulfilled within each mesh element (finite volume U) in the integral sense.
is fulfilled
For within each mesh element (finite
U : volume U) in the integral sense.
Zthat
it is integrated over the Z volume
For that@u it iis integrated
@.ui uj / over the volume1 U@p : @ @
C dU D Fi C ui d U (6.2)
Z @t @xj Z @xi @xj @xj
Z @ui C @.ui uj / d U D Z Fi 1 @p C @ @ ui d U
U U
@u (6.2)
@t i C @.u @xi u
jj
/
dU
1 @pi
Fi @x
D U results
@ @
C @xj @xj ui d U (6.2)
Application
U @t of the
@xj Gauss theorem in
@xi @xj @xj
U U
Application
Z of the
Z Gauss theorem Z results Zin Z
Application
@ of the Gauss theorem results1 in
ui d U C ui uE nE dS D Fi d U p eEi nE dS C grad ui nE dS (6.3)
@t Z Z Z Z Z
@ UZ S U 1
Z ui uE nE dS D Z Fi d U Z p eEi nE dS C Z grad ui nE dS
S S
@ u i d U C 1 (6.3)
@t U C S ui uEapplied
ui d procedure nE dS D Uto F S p eEequation
E dS C gives
grad ui nE dS (6.3)
The Usame idU
the continuity in S
@t
Z
U S U S S
The same procedure applied to the continuity equation gives
The same procedure applied to theuE ncontinuity
E dS D 0 equation gives (6.4)
Z
Z uE nE dS D 0
S
(6.4)
S
uE nE dS D 0 (6.4)
55
S
55
55
6.2 Sample
Let us consider the two dimensional transport equation without the diffusion
term
8̂
@ui @ui uj @p
ˆ
< @t C @x D @x
j i
(6.5)
ˆ @uj
:̂ D0
@xj
In the integral form this equation reads
Z Z Z
@
ui d U C ui uE nE dS D p eEi nE dS (6.6)
@t
U S S
We use the staggered grid (Fig. 13.2). The pressure is stored at the volume
centers. The ux velocity is stored at the centers of vertical faces, whereas
the velocity uy component at centers of horizontal faces. The x- equation
is satisfied for volumes displaced in x-direction, whereas the y-equation for
these displaced in y-direction.
Below we consider approximations of different terms:
Z
Q2p D p eE2 nE dS pn Sn ps Ss D pij C1 pij (6.9)
S
57
58
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Finite Volume Method
.uxij C uxiC1j /2 .uxij C uxi 1j /2 C
4 4
.uxij C uxij C1 /.uyij C uyiC1j / .uxij C uxij 1 /.uyij 1 C uyi C1j 1 /
4 4
C piC1j pij D 0
2
unC1 n
xij uxij
C
t
n
.u C unxiC1j /2 .unxij C unxi 1j /2 C
4 xij 4
n
.u C unxij C1 /.uyij
n n
C uyiC1j / .unxij C unxij 1 /.uyij
n n
1 C uyi C1j 1 /
4 xij 4
n n
C pi C1j 59pij D 0 (6.11)
nC1 n
2
uyij uyij
C
t
n n n
.uyij C uyiC1j /.unxij C unxij C1 / .uyij n
C uyi n n
1j /.uxi 1j C uxi 1j C1 /C
4 4
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
n n 2 n n 2
.uyij C uyij C1 / .uyij C uyij 1 / C
4 4 59
n n
C pij C1 pij D 0 (6.12)
nC1 n
2
uyij uyij
C
t
Lectures
non computational fluid dynamics n Finite Volume Method
n n n n n n
.uyij C uyi C1j /.uxij C uxij C1 / .uyij C uyi 1j /.uxi 1j C uxi 1j C1 /C
4 4
n n 2 n n 2
.uyij C uyij C1 / .u C uyij 1 / C
4 4 yij
n n
C pij C1 pij D 0 (6.12)
The Poisson equation for pressure is derived in the same manner as above
for finite difference method. For that the equations (6.11) is differentiated
on x, whereas the equation (6.12) is differentiated on y. Then both results
are summed under assumptions that both unC1 ij and unij are divergence free:
ıunC1
xij
nC1
ıuyij ıunxij n
ıuyij
C D 0; C D0
ıx ıy ıx ıy
This equation is coupled with equations (6.11) and (6.12). The explicit
scheme has advantage that the solution at the time instant n C 1 is ex-
plicitly expressed through the solution at time instant n. The solution of
linear algebraic equations which is the most laborious numerical procedure
is necessary only for the solution of the Poisson equation. The momentum
equations (6.11) and (6.12) are solved explicitly. Velocities unC1 nC1
xij and uyij
are computed then from simple algebraic formula (6.11) and (6.12). The big
disadvantage of the explicit method is the limitation forced by the Courant
Friedrich Levy criterion. The time step t should be very small to secure the
numerical stability. This disadvantage can be overcome within the implicit
schemes.
2
unC1 We do not reinvent
n
xij uxij
C
t the wheel we reinvent
nC1
.u C unC1 2
xi C1j / .unC1 C ulight.
nC1 2
xi 1j / C
4 xij 4 xij
Fascinating lighting offers an infinite spectrum of
60 possibilities: Innovative technologies and new
markets provide both opportunities and challenges.
An environment in which your expertise is in high
demand. Enjoy the supportive working atmosphere
within our global group and benefit from international
career paths. Implement sustainable ideas in close
cooperation with other specialists and contribute to
influencing our future. Come and join us in reinventing
light every day.
Light is OSRAM
2
unC1 n
xij uxij
C
t
nC1 nC1
.uxij C unC1 2
xiC1j / .u C unC1 2
xi 1j / C
4 4 xij
nC1 60 .unC1 C unC1 /.unC1 C unC1
.uxij C unC1 nC1 nC1
xij C1 /.uyij C uyi C1j / xij 1 yij 1 yi C1j 1 /
4 4 xij
nC1 nC1
C pi C1j pij D0 (6.13)
nC1 n
2
uyij uyij
C
t
nC1 nC1 nC1 nC1 nC1 nC1 nC1 nC1
.uyij C uyi C1j /.uxij C uxij C1 / .u C uyi 1j /.uxi 1j C uxi 1j C1 /C
4 4 yij
nC1 nC1 2 nC1 nC1 2
.uyij C uyij C1 / .u C uyij 1 / C
4 4 yij
nC1 nC1
C pij C1 pij D0 (6.14)
The Poisson equation for pressure is derived in the same manner as above
for finite difference method. For that the equations (6.13) is differentiated
on x, whereas the equation (6.14) is differentiated on y. Then both results
are summed under assumptions that both unC1 ij and unij are divergence free:
ıunC1
xij
nC1
ıuyij ıunxij n
ıuyij
C D 0; C D0
ıx ıy ıx ıy
The resulting Poisson equation can not be solved because both the r.h.s.
(velocities) and the l.h.s (pressure) depend on n C 1. The term on r.h.s.
cannot be computed until the computation of velocity field at time n C 1
is completed and vice versa. Other problem is that the equations (6.13)
and (6.14) are non linear.
@ui uj @u.m/
i uj
.m1/
D (6.15)
@xj @xj
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
The velocity uj is taken from the previous iteration .m1/. The system (6.11)
61
and (6.12) is rewritten in the form
61
iterative procedure. Let m be an iteration number. The nonlinear term is
represented in form:
@ui uj
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
@u.m/
i uj
.m1/
Finite Volume Method
D (6.15)
@xj @xj
The velocity uj is taken from the previous iteration .m1/. The system (6.11)
and (6.12) is rewritten in the form
2
u.m/ unxij
xij 61
C
t
.m/ .m/
.uxij C u.m/ .m1/
xi C1j /.uxij C u.m1/
xi C1j / .u C u.m/ .m1/
xi 1j /.uxij C u.m1/
xi 1j /C
4 4 xij
.m/ .m/
.uxij C u.m/ .m1/
xij C1 /.uyij
.m1/
C uyi C1j / .u C u.m/ .m1/ .m1/
xij 1 /.uyij 1 C uyi C1j 1 /
4 4 xij
.m/ .m/
C pi C1j pij D 0
.m/ n
2
uyij uyij
C
t
.m/ .m/ .m1/ .m/
.uyij C uyi C1j /.uxij C u.m1/
xij C1 /
.m/
.uyij C uyi .m1/ .m1/
1j /.uxi 1j C uxi 1j C1 /C
4 4
.m/ .m/ .m1/ .m1/ .m/ .m/ .m1/ .m1/
.uyij C uyij C1 /.uyij C uyij C1 / .uyij C uyij 1 /.uyij C uyij 1 /C
4 4
.m/ .m/
C pij C1 pij D 0
or
C pi.m/
C1j pij.m/ D rxij
.m/ .m/
C pij C1 pij D ryij
where
62
62
.m/ .m/ .m/ .m/ .m/
qyi 1j uyi1j Cqyij uyij Cqyi C1j uyi C1j Cqyij 1 uyij 1 Cqyij C1 uyij C1 C (6.17)
Lectures on computational fluidC .m/
dynamics .m/ Finite Volume Method
pij C1 pij D ryij
where
.m1/
qxij D 2 =t C
Œ.u C u.m1/
xi C1j / .uxij
.m1/
C u.m1/
xi 1j /C
4 xij62
.m1/ .m1/ .m1/ .m1/
C .uyij C uyi C1j / .uyij 1 C uyi C1j 1 /
.m1/
qxi C1j D .u.m1/
xij C u.m1/
xi C1j /; qxi 1j D .uxi 1j C uxij
.m1/
/;
4 4
.m1/ .m1/ .m1/ .m1/
qxij C1 D .uyij C uyi C1j /; qxij 1 D .uyij 1 C uyi C1j 1 /
4 4
2 .m1/ .m1/ .m1/ .m1/
qyij D C uyij C uyij C1 u yij C u yij 1 C
t 4
.m1/ .m1/
C uxij C u.m1/ xij C1 u .m1/
xi 1j C u xi 1j C1
.m1/
qyi 1j D uxi 1j C u.m1/
xi 1j C1 ; qyi C1j D u.m1/
xij C u.m1/
xij C1
4 4
.m1/ .m1/
360°
.m1/ .m1/
qyij 1 D uyij C uyij 1 ; qyij C1 D uyij C uyij C1
4 4
.
n n
uxij uyij
rxij D 2 ; ryij D 2
thinking
t t
C pi.m/
C1j pij.m/ =qxij D Rxij
360°
ayi 1j u
thinking
.m/
Cu Ca
yi 1j
.m/
yij
. .m/
yi C1j uyi C1j
360°
.m/
C ayij 1 uyij .m/
1 C ayij C1 uyij C1 C (6.19)
.m/ .m/
thinking
C pij C1 pij =qyij D Ryij .
where ax;ykl D qx;ykl =qx;yij and Rx;ykl D rx;ykl =qx;yij . In what follows we
use the operator form of equations (6.18) and (6.19):
uDiscover
D Au C Bpthe
C Ctruth at www.deloitte.ca/careers
(6.20) Dis
63
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers © Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
.m/ .m/
C pi C1j pij =qxij D Rxij
.m/ .m/
C pij C1 pij =qyij D Ryij
where ax;ykl D qx;ykl =qx;yij and Rx;ykl D rx;ykl =qx;yij . In what follows we
use the operator form of equations (6.18) and (6.19):
u D Au C Bp C C (6.20)
The iterative scheme consists of following steps. First, the intermediate so-
lution is calculated with pressure taken from the previous iteration:
u0 D Au0 C Bp 0 (6.24)
The velocity at the iteration .m/ is
ru.mC1/ D 0 (6.26)
what results in
64
The equation (6.28) is the Poisson equation for the pressure correction p 0 .
The solution algorithm is summarized in Fig. 6.2. Let the solution is known
at time slice n, the solution at the next time instant n C 1 is seeking. In the
first iteration all quantities are taken from the previous time instant
u.mD1/ n .mD1/
x;yij D ux;yij ; pij D pijn
At each time instant the inner loop iterations are performed until residuals
are getting smaller than some threshold
maxju.m/ .m1/
x;yij ux;yij j < "u ; maxjpijm.m/ pij.m1/ j < "p
As soon as the inner loop iterations are converged the solution at time in-
stant n C 1 is equaling to the solution from the last iteration and the next
time instant
Download freeis computed.
eBooks The structure of the inner loop is shown in Fig. 6.2.
at bookboon.com
65
6.7.1 Pressure correction equation
Let us consider the pressure correction equation (6.28) in details.This equa-
tion is solved for the control volume shown in Fig. 6.3. The divergency
maxju.m/ .m1/
x;yij ux;yij j < "u ; maxjpijm.m/ pij.m1/ j < "p
As soon as the inner loop iterations are converged the solution at time in-
stant n C 1 is equaling to the solution from the last iteration and the next
Lectures on computational
time instant fluid dynamics
is computed. Finite
The structure of the inner loop is shown in Fig. Volume Method
6.2.
.Bp 0 /xij D pi0 C1j pij0 =qxij ; .Bp 0 /xi 1j D pij0 pi0 1j =qxi 1j
.Bp /yij D pij C1 pij =qyij ; .Bp /yij 1 D pij pij 1 =qyij 1 :
0 0 0 0 0 0
.Bp 0 /yij D pij0 C1 pij0 =qyij ; .Bp 0 /yij 1 D pij0 pij0 1 =qyij 1 :
(6.31)
Substitution of (6.30) and (6.31) into (6.28) results in (6.31)
Substitution of (6.30) and (6.31) into (6.28) results in
pi0 C1j pij0 =qxij pij0 pi0 1j =qxi 1j C pij0 C1 pij0 =qyij
pi0 C1j pij0 =qxij pij0 pi0 1j =qxi 1j C pij0 C1 pij0 =qyij
Wewill
pij0 turn
pij0 1 your
=qyij 1CV into
D .u
xij uxi 1j C uyij uyij 1 / (6.32)
anopportunity
pij pij 1 =qyijof
0 0
1 a
D lifetime
.uxij uxi 1j C uyij uyij 1 / (6.32)
or
or
ˇi C1j pi0 C1j C ˇij pij0 C ˇi 1j pi0 1j C ˇij C1 pij0 C1 C ˇij 1 pij0 1 D cij (6.33)
ˇi C1j pi0 C1j C ˇij pij0 C ˇi 1j pi0 1j C ˇij C1 pij0 C1 C ˇij 1 pij0 1 D cij (6.33)
where
where
1 1 1 1
cij D .uxij uxi 1j Cuyij uyij 1 /; ˇij D
C C C ;
1
qxij qxi11j qyij
1 qyij1 1
cij D .uxij uxi 1j Cuyij uyij 1 /; ˇij D C C C ;
qxij qxi 1j qyij qyij 1
1 1 1 1
Do you like cars?D
ˇi C1j Would you i 1jtoD
; ˇlike be a part of; ˇ
a ij C1 D brand?
successful ; ˇij 1 D : us your CV on
Send
We will appreciate and 1
qxijreward both your 1
qxienthusiasm
1j 1
qyij
and talent. qyij1 1www.employerforlife.com
ˇ
Send us youri C1j D ; ˇ 1j D
CV. Youqwill be isurprised
; ˇ ij C1 D ; ˇij 1 D :
xij qwhere
xi 1j
it can take you.
qyij qyij 1
66
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com 66
0
.Bpon
Lectures /yij D pij0 C1
computational pij0dynamics
fluid =qyij ; .Bp 0 /yij 1 D pij0 pij0 1 1 : Volume Method
=qyijFinite
(6.31)
Substitution of (6.30) and (6.31) into (6.28) results in
pi0 C1j pij0 =qxij pij0 pi0 1j =qxi 1j C pij0 C1 pij0 =qyij
pij0 pij0 1 =qyij 1 D .uxij uxi 1j C uyij
uyij 1 / (6.32)
or
ˇi C1j pi0 C1j C ˇij pij0 C ˇi 1j pi0 1j C ˇij C1 pij0 C1 C ˇij 1 pij0 1 D cij (6.33)
where
1 1 1 1
cij D .uxij uxi 1j
Cuyij
uyij 1 /; ˇij D C C C ;
qxij qxi 1j qyij qyij 1
1 1 1 1
ˇi C1j D ; ˇi 1j D ; ˇij C1 D ; ˇij 1 D :
qxij qxi 1j qyij qyij 1
˛ D .i 1/Ny C j
Let the solution at the time instant n be known. The task is to find the
solution at the time n C 1. At each time instant the guess solution is taken
from the previous time instant:
u.1/ n .1/ n
x;y˛ D ux;y˛ ; p˛ D p˛
ii) Calculation
Download free eBooksof the pressure
at bookboon.com correction p˛0 from the system of linear
algebraic equations: 67
0
ˇ˛CNy p˛CNy
C ˇ˛ p˛0 C ˇ˛Ny p˛N
0
y
0
C ˇ˛C1 p˛C1 0
C ˇ˛1 p˛1 D c˛
0
tems of linear algebraic equations:
ii) Calculation of the pressure correction p˛0 from the system of linear
algebraic equations:
0
ˇ˛CNy p˛CNy
C ˇ˛ p˛0 C ˇ˛Ny p˛N
0
y
0
C ˇ˛C1 p˛C1 0
C ˇ˛1 p˛1 D c˛
0 0
uy˛ D p˛C1 p˛0 =qy˛
67
Figure 6.3: Control volume used for the pressure correction equation.
maxju.m/ .m1/
x;y˛ ux;y˛ j < "u ; maxjp˛.m/ p˛.m1/ j < "p
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
If these conditions are not fulfilled then
68
u.m1/
x;y˛ D u.m/ .m1/
x;y˛ ; p˛ D p˛.m/
and go to the step i). Otherwise the calculation at the time moment
Lectures
Figureon6.3:
computational fluid dynamics
Control volume used for the pressure correction equation.Finite Volume Method
maxju.m/ .m1/
x;y˛ ux;y˛ j < "u ; maxjp˛.m/ p˛.m1/ j < "p
and go to the step i). Otherwise the calculation at the time moment
n C 1 is completed
68
�e Graduate Programme
I joined MITAS because for Engineers and Geoscientists
I wanted real responsibili� www.discovermitas.com
Maersk.com/Mitas �e G
I joined MITAS because for Engine
I wanted real responsibili� Ma
Month 16
I was a construction Mo
supervisor ina const
I was
the North Sea super
advising and the No
Real work he
helping foremen advis
International
al opportunities
Internationa
�ree wo
work
or placements ssolve problems
Real work he
helping fo
International
Internationaal opportunities
�ree wo
work
or placements ssolve pr
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
Chapter
Chapter 7
Overview7 of pressure correction
Overview
Overview of
methods of pressure
pressure correction
correction
methods
methods
7.1 SIMPLE algorithm
7.1linearized
The SIMPLE algorithm
Navier Stokes equation written in operator form is
7.1 SIMPLE algorithm
The linearized Navier Stokesuequation
D Au Cwritten
Bp C Cin operator form is (7.1)
The linearized Navier Stokes equation written in operator form is
Within the SIMPLE algorithm u Dthe
Ausolution
C Bp C is
C seeking at each time step in
(7.1)
form of the loop: u D Au C Bp C C (7.1)
Within the SIMPLE algorithm the solution is seeking at each time step in
Within
form of the SIMPLE algorithm the solution is seeking at each time step in
the loop:
form of the loop: of the auxiliary velocity
Calculation
u D Au
Calculation of the auxiliary
C Bp .m1/ C C
velocity (7.2)
Calculation of the auxiliary velocity
u D Au C Bp .m1/ C C (7.2)
Calculation of the pressure
u D correction
Au C Bp .m1/ C C (7.2)
rBp 0 D ru
Calculation of the pressure correction (7.3)
Calculation of the pressure correction
rBp 0 D ru (7.3)
Calculation of the velocity correction
rBp 0 D ru (7.3)
u0 D Bp 0
Calculation of the velocity correction (7.4)
Calculation of the velocity correction
u0 D Bp 0 (7.4)
Correction u0 D Bp 0 (7.4)
u D u C u0 ; p .m/ D p .m1/ C p 0
.m/
(7.5)
Correction
Correction u.m/ D u C u690
; p .m/ D p .m1/ C p 0 (7.5)
7.2 PISO algorithm u D u C u ; p .m/ D p .m1/ C p 0
.m/ 0
(7.5)
In the SIMPLE algorithm we neglected 69 the term rAu0 (see 6.25). In PISO
69
algorithm this term is taken into account. Actually the term rAu0 can not
be calculated before the velocity correction is computed. Therefore, the term
is taken into account in an iterative way.
u0 D Bp 0 (7.7)
7.2.1 First iteration
The term Au0 is neglected, i.e. Au0 D 0. The pressure correction is found
from the Poisson equation
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Overview of pressure correction methods
0
rBp D ru (7.6)
The velocity correction is then
u0 D Bp 0 (7.7)
7.2.3 Correction
Corrected velocities and pressure are
it is easy to prove that the velocity u.m/ satisfies the continuity equation.
Now we prove the equation u.m/ D Au.m/ C Bp .m/ C C :
Since 70
u D Au C Bp .m1/
C C; u0 D Bp 0 ; u00 D Au0 C Bp 00
the equation (7.11) is not satisfied. The residual is Au00 . The residual can be
reduced within next iterations. However, usually, PISO algorithm uses only
two iterations.
7.2.4 Summary
The PISO algorithm can be summarized as follows:
Correction
Correction
Correction
0 00 0 00
u.m/
u D u C u C u ;p
.m/
Dp
.m1/
.m/ D u C u0 C u00 ; p .m/ D p .m1/ C p 0 C p 00
Cp Cp (7.17)
(7.17)
u.m/ D u C u0 C u00 ; p .m/ D p .m1/ C p 0 C p 00 (7.17)
Both
Both algorithms
algorithms PISO
PISO and
and SIMPLE
SIMPLE are
are widely
widely used
used in
in CFD
CFD codes.
codes.
Both algorithms PISO and SIMPLE are widely used in CFD codes.
71
71
71
X
N X
N
Aˇ u0ˇ u0˛ Aˇ (7.18)
ˇ D1 ˇ D1
where ˇ is the number of adjacent control volumes around the control volume
with the number ˛.
PN 0
ˇ D1 Aˇ uˇ
u0˛ PN (7.19)
ˇ D1 Aˇ
u0 D Au0 C Bp 0 (7.20)
or
X
N
u0˛ D Aˇ u0ˇ C Bp 0 (7.21)
ˇ D1
X
N
u0˛ D u0˛ Aˇ C Bp 0 (7.22)
ˇ D1
and
Bp 0
u0˛ D PN (7.23)
1 ˇ D1 Aˇ
0 Bp 0
rBp D ru rA PN
1 ˇ D1 Aˇ
or
B
r B CA PN72 p 0 D ru (7.24)
1 ˇ D1 Aˇ
The computational steps are the same as these in SIMPLE algorithm with
only difference that the equation (7.24) is solved instead of (7.3).
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
73
Chapter 8
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Computational grids
Chapter
Chapter 8
8
Computational grids
Computational
Computational grids
grids
8.1 Grid types
8.1computational
The Grid types grids are subdivided into:
8.1 Grid types
The computational
structured grids (seeare
grids Fig. 8.1a), into:
subdivided
The computational grids are subdivided into:
block structured
structured gridsFig.
grids (see (see8.1a),
Fig. 8.1b),
structured grids (see Fig. 8.1a),
unstructured
block structured grids (see(see
grids Fig.Fig.
8.1c).
8.1b),
block structured grids (see Fig. 8.1b),
Disadvantage of thegrids
unstructured structured grid
(see Fig. is shown in Fig. 8.2. Refinement of the
8.1c).
gridclose to the wallgrids
unstructured results inFig.
(see the refinement
8.1c). in areas where this refinement is
Disadvantage
not necessary. of thedisadvantage
This structured gridcanisbeshown in Fig.
overcome 8.2. ofRefinement
by use of the
block-structured
Disadvantage
grid
(Fig. close toand
8.1b) ofwall
the the results
structured
unstructured grid
in grid
the is shown
8.1c).ininareas
refinement
(Fig. Fig. where
8.2. Refinement of the
this refinement is
grid close to the wall results in the refinement in areas where this
not necessary. This disadvantage can be overcome by use of block-structured refinement is
not necessary.
(Fig. 8.1b) andThis disadvantage
unstructured gridcan be 8.1c).
(Fig. overcome by use of block-structured
(Fig. 8.1b) and unstructured grid (Fig. 8.1c).
should be smooth especially at the border between different grid blocks. The
grid resolution should be high especially in areas of boundary layers and close
to the free surface. For this sake the special refinement is used in these areas.
To increase the accuracy of the computations in boundary layers one uses
special grid boundary layers close to walls.
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
If moving grids are used the Navier Stokes should be transformed to take the
velocity of grid faces UEg into account,
u n
@E o 1
C uE UEg r uE D fE rp C E
u (8.1)
@t
Thomas and Lombard have shown that the function UEg can not be arbi-
trary rather than they have to be found from the Geometric Conservation
Law
Z Z
@
d U UEg nE dS D 0 (8.2)
@t
U S
Where U and S are respectively volume and surface of cells. The equa-
tion (8.2) is derived from the condition that the computation of the control
volumes or of the grid velocities must be performed in a such a way that
the resulting numerical scheme preserves the state of the uniform flow, in-
dependently of theatdeformation
Download free eBooks bookboon.com of the grid. The equation (8.2) is satisfied
automatically if the control volumes don’t change their shape. The Geomet-
75
ric conservation law (8.2) should solve coupled with other fluid flow equations
using the same discretizations schemes.
More detailed information about grid generation can be found in [3], [7]
trary rather than they have to be found from the Geometric Conservation
Law
Z Z
@
d U UEg nE dS D 0
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Computational
(8.2) grids
@t
U S
Where U and S are respectively volume and surface of cells. The equa-
tion (8.2) is derived from the condition that the computation of the control
volumes or of the grid velocities must be performed in a such a way that
the resulting numerical scheme preserves the state of the uniform flow, in-
dependently of the deformation of the grid. The equation (8.2) is satisfied
automatically if the control volumes don’t change their shape. The Geomet-
ric conservation law (8.2) should solve coupled with other fluid flow equations
using the same discretizations schemes.
More detailed information about grid generation can be found in [3], [7]
and [8].
77
Mathematical modelling of
turbulent flows
77
79
Chapter 9
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Physics of turbulence
Chapter
Chapter 9
9 turbulence
Physics of
Physics
Physics of
of turbulence
turbulence
9.1 Definition of the turbulence
9.1 Definition
Flow motions are subdividedof the turbulence
into laminar flows and turbulent ones. The
9.1 Definition
word ” Laminar” in Greek ofmeans
thelayer.
turbulence
The fluid particles move orderly
Flow
in motions
layers are intense
without subdivided intomixing.
lateral laminarThe flows and turbulent
disruption betweenones. The
layers is
Flow
word motions
” are
Laminar” subdivided
in Greek into
means laminar
layer. Theflows and
fluid turbulent
particles ones.
move
absent. On the contrary the turbulent flow is very chaotic with strong eddies The
orderly
word ” Laminar”
in layers
and without
intense inacross
Greek
mixingintense themeans
lateral layer. The
mixing.
flow. The disruption
fluid particles movelayers
between orderly
is
in layers
absent. without
On the intense
contrary lateral
the mixing.
turbulent flow The
is disruption
very chaotic
Turbulent motion is the three dimensional unsteady flow motion with between
with layers
strong is
eddies
absent. On the contrary the turbulent
and intense mixing across the flow. flow is very chaotic with strong eddies
and intense
Turbulent mixing
motion
chaotical isacross the
the three
trajectories flow.
dimensional
of fluid particles,unsteady flow motion with
Turbulent motion is the three dimensional unsteady flow motion with
fluctuations of the velocity
chaotical trajectories and
of fluid particles,
chaotical trajectories of fluid particles,
strong mixing
fluctuations of the velocity and
fluctuations of the velocity and
strong
arisen mixing
at large Re numbers due to unstable vortex dynamics.
strong mixing
arisen at large Re numbers due to unstable vortex dynamics.
9.2 atVortex
arisen dynamics
large Re numbers due to unstable vortex dynamics.
9.2vortex
The Vortex
dynamics dynamics
is the key to understand what happens in the turbulent
9.2
flow. Vortex dynamics
The vortex dynamics is the key to understand what happens in the turbulent
The
flow.vortex dynamics is the key to understand what happens in the turbulent
9.2.1
flow. Vorticity transport equation
The vectorVorticity
9.2.1 calculus relation reads: equation
transport
9.2.1 Vorticity transport equation
The vector calculus 1relation reads:
r.A A/ D A .r A/ C .Ar/A (9.1)
The vector calculus 2relation reads:
1
Taking u D A we get:12 r.A A/ D A 81 .r A/ C .Ar/A (9.1)
r.A A/ D A .r A/ C .Ar/A (9.1)
2
1
r.u u/ D u81 ! C .ur/u (9.2)
2 81
where ! D r u is the vorticity.
Application of the curl operator to (9.2) results in
@u 1
r . C .ur/u/ D r . rp C u/ (9.5)
Application of the curl operator to (9.2) results in
@u 1
r . C .ur/u/ D r . rp C u/ (9.5)
@t
@!
C r ..ur/u/ D .r u/ D ! (9.6)
@t
Substituting (9.4) into (9.6) results in
@!
C .ur/! D .!r/u C ! (9.7)
@t
D!
D .!r/u C ! (9.8)
Dt
The equation (9.8) is the vorticity transport equation.
82
“The perfect start
of a successful,
international career.”
CLICK HERE
to discover why both socially
and academically the University
of Groningen is one of the best
places for a student to be
www.rug.nl/feb/education
r! D r.r u/ D 0 (9.9)
The consequence of the condition (9.9) is:
All vortex lines, defined as the lines which are tangential to the vorticity
vector ! d l D 0, are closed in the three dimensional case (Fig. 9.3).
83
The reason for that can be explained by analysis of the vorticity transport
equation
D!
D .!r/u C ! (9.11)
Dt
The r.h.s. of (9.11) contains two terms. The first term .!r/u is responsible
for the rotation of the vorticity vector ! and enlargement or reduction of its
magnitude j!j. The second diffusion term results in spreading of the vortic-
ity in the space. The term .!r/u is responsible for the amplification of the
vorticity.
81
84
The r.h.s. of (9.11) contains two terms. The first term .!r/u is responsible
for the rotation of the vorticity vector ! and enlargement or reduction of its
magnitude j!j. The second diffusion term results in spreading of the vortic-
ity in the space. The term .!r/u is responsible for the amplification of the
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Physics of turbulence
vorticity.
84
– International
As shown Bachelor’s
by Chorin [10] programme
and [11] the in Life Science
folding is necessary mechanism pre-
– Master’s programme in Chemistry
venting the exponential growth of vorticity. If the amplification is too strong,
– Master’s
the vorticity goesprogramme
to infinity andin Molecular
the Biology
energy is not kept constant. Chorin [10]
notes that ”as the vortices stretch, their cross-section decreases and the en-
ergy associated with them would increase unless they arranged themselves in
such a way that their velocity canceled. The foldings achieves such cancela-
tion”. This could be easily explained using a simple sample. If we have just
one straight infinite vortex it induces the velocity in the plane perpendicular
to its axis. If this vortex is tangled the vortex pieces with different vorticity
direction are approaching close each to other canceling their induction (see
Fig. 9.5).
Chorin [11] explicitly specifies typical scales of folding: ” the inertial range 1
properties are due Sweden
to the appearance of folded vortex tubes, which behave on
www.teknat.umu.se/english
large scales as self-avoiding walks, and on small scales contain a large num-
1
this termfree
Download willeBooks
be introduced in the next chapter
at bookboon.com
As shown by Chorin [10] and [11] the folding is necessary mechanism pre-
venting the exponential growth of vorticity. If the amplification is too strong,
the vorticity goes to infinity and the energy is not kept constant. Chorin [10]
notes that ”as the vortices stretch, their cross-section decreases and the en-
ergy associated with them would increase unless they arranged themselves in
such a way that their velocity canceled. The foldings achieves such cancela-
tion”. This could be easily explained using a simple sample. If we have just
one straight infinite vortex it induces the velocity in the plane perpendicular
to its axis. If this vortex is tangled the vortex pieces with different vorticity
direction are approaching close each to other canceling their induction (see
Figure
Fig. 9.5).9.4: Velocities induced by vortices. Three dimensional curvilinear
vortices
Chorin [11]induce self induced
explicitly velocities.
specifies typical scales of folding: ” the inertial range 1
properties are due to the appearance of folded vortex tubes, which behave on
of vortons
large scalesstructures can increase
as self-avoiding exponentially
walks, and up tocontain
on small scales the infinity without
a large num-
viscosity
1
effects. The vorticity growth caused by inviscid amplification term
this term will be introduced in the next chapter
is counterbalanced by the diffusion term. Two terms on r.h.s. of (9.11) com-
pete with each other.R In the inviscid fluid the circulation of the vortex core
is constant D S !x dS D const . Increase 85 of !x results in the decrease of
the cross section S . The vortex becomes thinner. The diffusion acts against
and makes the vortex thicker. In some flow regions the amplification can be
stronger that diffusion. The thin vortex losses the stability and is folded.
As shown by Chorin [10] and [11] the folding is necessary mechanism pre-
venting the exponential growth of vorticity. If the amplification is too strong,
the vorticity goes to infinity and the energy is not kept constant. Chorin [10]
notes that ”as theFigure 9.5: stretch,
vortices Illustration
theirofcross-section
the vortex folding.
decreases and the en-
ergy associated with them would increase unless they arranged themselves in
such
ber ofa folds
way that their velocity
(=hairpins) that arecanceled.
neededThe foldings
to satisfy theachieves suchofcancela-
constraint energy
tion”. This could be easily explained using a simple sample. If we have just
conservation”.
one straight infinite vortex it induces the velocity in the plane perpendicular
to its axis. If this
Summarizing vortexmentioned
all effects is tangled above
the vortex pieces
one can with different
imagine vorticity
the following sce-
direction are approaching close each to other canceling their induction
nario (see Fig. 9.6). Let the vorticity at a certain point of the flow grows. (see
Fig. 9.5).
In the real physical process folding prevents the growth of the kinetic energy
Chorin [11] explicitly
and increases specifieseffect
the canceling typical scales of folding:
of viscosity. ” the
Then the inertial
vortex range 1
structures
properties
breaks down areinto
duesmall
to thestructures
appearance of to
due folded vortex tubes,
reconnection which behave
mechanism on
described
large
in thescales as self-avoiding walks, and on small scales contain a large num-
next subsection.
1
this term will be introduced in the next chapter
86
induction two opposite sides of the ring are merged. As soon as two elements
with opposite vorticity sign are approaching each to other, they start to
cancel each other by mutual diffusion. The vortices disappear in the area of
the contact. Two small vortices are created from one big vortex. Each small
vortex ring breaks then down into smaller vortices and so on. The energy
of small vortices is equal to the energy of the big vortex with a small loss
caused by the dissipation. This fact is formulated in the sentence, which is
common in the turbulence theory: The energy is transferred from large scale
vortices to small scales vortices. The reconnection process can be observed
on macroscales. The decay, break up of tip vortices behind the airplane
proceeds according to the same scenario (see Fig. 9.8). The reconnection
process
Downloadis, perhaps,
free eBooks atthe main mechanism of vortex cascade in the turbulent
bookboon.com
flows, i.e. transformation of big vortices into small ones. The reconnection
84
can also lead to enlargement of small vortices if two rings approach each to
other as shown in Fig. 9.7 (see red circle). In this case the energy of small
vortices turns into the energy of the big vortex. This process is referred to
as the energy back scattering. Statistically, the direct energy flux sufficiently
Lectures on computational
Figurefluid dynamics
9.7: Scenario of vortex reconnection. Physics of turbulence
induction two opposite sides of the ring are merged. As soon as two elements
with opposite vorticity sign are approaching each to other, they start to
cancel each other by mutual diffusion. The vortices disappear in the area of
the contact. Two small vortices are created from one big vortex. Each small
vortex ring breaks then down into smaller vortices and so on. The energy
of small vortices is equal to the energy of the big vortex with a small loss
caused by the dissipation. This fact is formulated in the sentence, which is
common in the turbulence theory: The energy is transferred from large scale
vortices to small scales vortices. The reconnection process can be observed
on macroscales. The decay, break up of tip vortices behind the airplane
proceeds according to the same scenario (see Fig. 9.8). The reconnection
process is, perhaps, the main mechanism of vortex cascade in the turbulent
flows, i.e. transformation of big vortices into small ones. The reconnection
can also lead to enlargement of small vortices if two rings approach each to
other as shown in Fig. 9.7 (see red circle). In this case the energy of small
vortices turns into the energy of the big vortex. This process is referred to
as the energy back scattering. Statistically, the direct energy flux sufficiently
surpasses the backward one.
AmericanBigonline
whorls have little whorls,
LIGS University87
is currently enrolling in the
Interactive Online BBA, MBA, MSc,
DBA and PhD programs:
87
Figure 9.8: Sample of the vortex reconnection of tip vortices behind an air-
Figure
plane. 9.8: Sample of the vortex reconnection of tip vortices behind an air-
plane.
Figure 9.8: Sample of the vortex reconnection of tip vortices behind an air-
plane.
Which feed on their velocity;
AndWhich feed onhave
little whorls theirlessor
velocity;
whorls,
And Which
little feed
whorlson their
have velocity;
lessor whorls,
And so on to viscosity (in the molecular sense).
And
And so on little whorls (in
to viscosity havethe
lessor whorls,sense).
molecular
And so on to viscosity (in the molecular sense).
9.2.6 Summary
9.2.6 Summary
9.2.6 Summary
Vortex arise in the fluid due to viscosity effects. They experience instability
Vortex arise in the fluid
and amplification. due to
Diffusion viscosity effects.
counteracts They experience
the amplification. If theinstability
Reynolds
and amplification.
Vortex arise in the Diffusion
fluid due counteracts
to viscosity the amplification.
effects. They If the
experience
number is large, the vortex structures are strong and concentrated. Reynolds
instability
The
number
and is large,
amplification. the vortex
Diffusion structures
counteracts are
the strong and concentrated.
amplification.
amplification can dominate at some fluid region over the diffusion. If the The
Reynolds
The
amplification
number can the
is large,
vortex instability isdominate
vortex
not dampedat some
structuresfluid
are region
by viscosity. Theover
strong flow the
and diffusion.
concentrated.
becomes The
stochastic
vortex instability
amplification
due to mutual can isdominate
not damped
interaction by viscosity.
at some
of unstable The
fluid region
vortices. flow
Theover becomes
the stochastic
diffusion.
big vortices break The
down
due to
vortex mutual
instabilityinteraction
is not of
dampedunstable
by vortices.
viscosity. The
The big
flow vortices
becomes
into small ones by means of vortex reconnection. The vortex instability break down
stochastic
into
due small
to
process mutualonesinteraction
by as
is identified means
the ofofunstable
vortex reconnection.
turbulence. vortices. The bigThe vortexbreak
vortices instability
down
process is identified as the turbulence.
into small ones by means of vortex reconnection. The vortex instability
process is identified as the turbulence.
9.3 Experimental observations
9.3 Experimental observations
9.3
DifferentExperimental observations
regimes of the fluid motion were revealed very early, perhaps, in
Different regimes
antique times. of the
Much fluid
later, motion da
Leonardo were revealed
Vinci very early,
recognized perhaps,
two states in
of the
antique
Differenttimes.
regimes
fluid motion Much
and of later,
the Leonardo
fluid
introduced termda
motion
the wereVinci
”la recognized
revealed two states
very early,
turbolenza”. Arkady of the
perhaps,
Tsinoberin
fluid
antiquemotion
times. and introduced
Much later, the term
Leonardo da”la turbolenza”.
Vinci recognized Arkady
two
in his book ”An informal introduction to turbulence” [1] presented most Tsinober
states of the
in hismotion
fluid book results
outstanding ”An
and informal
introduced introduction
in turbulencethe researchtointurbulence”
term ”la turbolenza”. [1]Arkady
chronological presented
order most
Tsinober
(Fig. 9.9).
outstanding
in results in turbulence research in chronological order
his book ”An informal introduction to turbulence” [1] presented most
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
(Fig. 9.9).
outstanding results in turbulence research 88 in chronological order (Fig. 9.9).
88 86
88
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Physics of turbulence
89
87
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Physics of turbulence
UK. The experiments done nowadays shown that the laminar- turbulent tran-
sition Reynolds number is less than that documented originally by Reynolds.
The reason is, presumably, the building vibration and noise caused by traffic
which was not in time of Reynolds. If the perturbations are eliminated the
transition can be delayed up to Re 40000:::50000.
90
9.3.2 Laminar - turbulent transition and turbulence in
jets
The jet flows experiences also laminar turbulent transition shown in Fig. 9.12.
Download free
Obviously, eBooks
the flowatcan
bookboon.com
be fully or only partially turbulent. Close to the noz-
zle the flow is laminar. The instability is developed
88 downstream. The shear
flow at the jet boundary is the area of rapid velocity change from the jet
velocity to zero outside of the jet. The shear flow experiences the so called
Kelvin Helmholtz instability (Fig. 9.13) resulting in formation of concen-
Lectures on computational
transition fluid dynamics
can be delayed up to Re 40000:::50000. Physics of turbulence
The Kelvin Helmholtz vortices experience then the pairing (see Fig. 9.14).
One vortex overtakes the neighbor vortex creating a pair. This process
has an inviscid convective nature and can be explained thinking back to
the famous leapfrog motion of two vortex rings. In the inviscid flow the
leapfrog motion is running as long as the convective instability destroys
the vortices. One vortex runs the next down, its radius decreases whereas
the speed increases. The radius of the next vortex increases, the speed
decreases. The first ring moves through the second one. The process is
then repeated. The movie illustrating this process can be downloaded from
http://www.lemos.uni-rostock.de/en/gallery/.
The paired vortices experience the azimuthal instability and takes the crude
ring form. Later they are destroyed downstream in the region 1 < x=D < 6.
In far field at large x=D the vortex structures look like a tree with branches
oriented against the main flow direction (see Fig. 9.15).
91
The paired vortices experience the azimuthal instability and takes the crude
ring form. Later they are destroyed downstream in the region 1 < x=D < 6.
In far field at large x=D the vortex structures look like a tree with branches
oriented against the main flow direction (see Fig. 9.15).
91
Creation of vortex rings is the reason for the jet noise. The noise produced,
for instance, by jet propulsors of airplanes is the action of these vortices.
The vortices play a significant positive role in jet mixers widely used in food
industry, chemical engineering, etc. That is why, one of the most perspective
way to reduce the noise or to increase mixing is the manipulation of vor-
tices arising behind the jet nozzle. To increase the mixing it is necessary to
Download free
strengthen eBooks
the at bookboon.com
Kelvin Helmholtz vortices. To decrease the noise the vortices
should be broken down into small ones. Fig. 90 9.16 shows the effect of the
acoustic impact on jet. The original vortices (lower picture) are split into
small ones (upper picture).
High resolution laser diagnostics methods LIF and PIV allow to get a deep
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Physics of turbulence
Figure 9.14: Development of instability in the free jet.
Creation of vortex rings is the reason for the jet noise. The noise produced,
for instance, by jet propulsors of airplanes is the action of these vortices.
The vortices play a significant positive role in jet mixers widely used in food
industry, chemical engineering, etc. That is why, one of the most perspective
way to reduce the noise or to increase mixing is the manipulation of vor-
tices arising behind the jet nozzle. To increase the mixing it is necessary to
strengthen the Kelvin Helmholtz vortices. To decrease the noise the vortices
should be broken down into small ones. Fig. 9.16 shows the effect of the
acoustic impact on jet. The original vortices (lower picture) are split into
small ones (upper picture).
High resolution laser diagnostics methods LIF and PIV allow to get a deep
inside into the structure of the turbulent flow. Fig. 9.17 shows the structure
of the confined jet mixer flow displayed by Planar Laser Induced Fluores-
cence (PLIF) Method. The macrostructure obtained with low resolution is
shown in the upper Figure. A small window with sizes 2:08mm 2:72mm
92
Figure
Download free 9.16:
eBooksVortex in a free jet with acoustic impact.[46].
structures
at bookboon.com
Figure 9.16: Vortex structures in a free jet with acoustic impact.
Figure 9.16: Vortex structures in a free jet with acoustic impact.
91
was selected for high resolution PLIF measurements. The vortex microstruc-
was selected for high resolution PLIF measurements. The vortex microstruc-
was
turesselected for highinresolution
are presented the lowerPLIF measurements.
Figure. The vortex
A very important microstruc-
observation is the
tures are presented in the lower Figure. A very important observation is the
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Physics of turbulence
94
92
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Physics of turbulence
Figure 9.18: Fine vortex structures in a confined jet mixer flow. PLIF mea-
surements by Valery Zhdanov (LTT Rostock). Spatial resolution is 31m.
The stress in wall turbulence flow can be considered as the sum of the laminar
and turbulent stresses: Maastricht
University is
the best specialist
D l C t university in the
(9.12)
Visit us and find out why we are the best! Netherlands
(Elsevier)
Master’s Open Day: 22 February
95 2014
www.mastersopenday.nl
Lectures on computational
structures fluidshown
schematically dynamics
in Fig. 9.21. Physics of turbulence
yC D u y
is the dimensionless wall distance.
The stress in wall turbulence flow can be considered as the sum of the laminar
and turbulent stresses:
D l C t (9.12)
95
Close to the wall the turbulent fluctuations are weak. The laminar stress
l dominates
Download over the turbulent one t , i.e. l . We consider the thin
free eBooks at bookboon.com
boundary layer, i.e. the stress is approximately equal to the wall stress w :
94
w (9.13)
Applying the Newton hypothesis (1.18) to the two dimensional wall bounded
Figure 9.20: Streaks visualized by hydrogen bubbles in the boundary layer
Lectures
on a flaton plate.
computational fluid dynamics Physics of turbulence
Close to the wall the turbulent fluctuations are weak. The laminar stress
l dominates over the turbulent one t , i.e. l . We consider the thin
boundary layer, i.e. the stress is approximately equal to the wall stress w :
w (9.13)
Applying the Newton hypothesis (1.18) to the two dimensional wall bounded
flow, one gets from (9.13)
dux
w D (9.14)
dy
or
ux
D yC C C (9.15)
u
From the condition at the wall ux D 0 the unknown constant C is zero, i.e.
96
Figure 9.22:
Download Vertical
free eBooks distribution of the velocity ux at three different time
at bookboon.com
Figure 9.22: Vertical distribution of the velocity ux at three different time
instants in boundary layer.
instants in boundary layer. 95
ux C
ux D y C (9.16)
u D y (9.16)
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Physics of turbulence
Figure 9.22: Vertical distribution of the velocity ux at three different time
instants in boundary layer.
Figure 9.22: Vertical distribution of the velocity ux at three different time
instants in boundary layer.
ux
D yC (9.16)
u
ux C
Close to the wall the velocity increases Dy linearly ux y. This law confirmed(9.16)
u C
in measurements is valid in the range 0 < y < 5. This region is reffered to
Close
as the to the wall
viscous the velocity increases linearly ux y. This law confirmed
sublayer.
C
in
Farmeasurements
from the wallisthe valid in the stresses
laminar range 0 are < 5. This
< ysmaller than region is reffered
the turbulent to
ones
as the viscous sublayer.
t . The turbulent stress t can be found from the Prandtl mixing length
Far fromThe
model. theinstantaneous
wall the laminar stresses
velocities areare smaller as
presented than
the the
sumturbulent
of averagedonesu
fluctuation
and 0
t . The turbulent stress t can be97found from the Prandtl mixing length
u parts:
ux D ux C ux ;97
0 0
uy D uy ; uy D 0 (9.17)
The averaged velocities are defined as
ZT
ux D lim ux .t/dt (9.18)
T !1
0
Prandtl proposed in 1925 a very simple algebraic relation for u0x uy0 using
ideas from the kinetic gas theory developed by Boltzmann. Let us consider
- © Photononstop
the fluid particle at the distance y from the wall. Let the particle velocity
be equal to the averaged velocity at y: ux . Due to some perturbations the
particle jumps from the position y to the position y Clx and attains the fluid
layer with the averaged velocity ux C ddyux
lx . Since the particle has velocity
ux , the velocity at the point y C dy is changed. Obviously, this change is
d ux
axa_ad_grad_prog_170x115.indd
dy x
l , or: 1 19/12/13 16:36
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
q
d ux96 Click on(9.20)
the ad to read more
ux0 2 D lx
dy
98
The turbulent stress 12 D xy according to the definition is
Prandtl proposed in 1925 a very simple algebraic relation for u0x uy0 using
ideas from the kinetic gas theory developed by Boltzmann. Let us consider
the fluid particle at the distance y from the wall. Let the particle velocity
be equal to the averaged velocity at y: ux . Due to some perturbations the
particle jumps from the position y to the position y Clx and attains the fluid
layer with the averaged velocity ux C ddyux
lx . Since the particle has velocity
ux , the velocity at the point y C dy is changed. Obviously, this change is
ddy
ux
lx , or:
q
d ux
ux0 2 D lx (9.20)
dy
98
Root square of the averaged squared pulsation in vertical direction is written
in a similar form: q
d ux
uy0 2 D ly (9.21)
dy
q q
Introducing the correlation coefficient Rxy D u0x uy0 = uy0 2 uy0 2 and using
(9.20) and (9.21) one gets:
2 2
d ux 2 d ux
j12 j D j t j D Rxy lx ly D l (9.22)
dy dy
where l 2 D Rxy lx ly is the mixing length of Prandtl. The mixing length
is determined from empirical data. For instance, the length for the wall
bounded flow is
l D y (9.23)
is the first constant of the turbulence, or the constant of Karman. It is
equal to 0:41. Van Driest proposed the modification of (9.23) to take the
wall damping effect into account:
yu
l D y 1 e A (9.24)
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
where A is the Van Driest constant, which is equal to 26 or 27. In shear flows
97
l D C onst ı.x/, where ı is the shear layer thickness.
We consider again the thin boundary layer, i.e. the stress is approximately
equal to the wall stress w D 12 . Using (9.22) and (9.23) we get
is the first constant of the turbulence, or the constant of Karman. It is
equal to 0:41. Van Driest proposed the modification of (9.23) to take the
wall damping effect into account:
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics yu
Physics of turbulence
l D y 1 e A (9.24)
where A is the Van Driest constant, which is equal to 26 or 27. In shear flows
l D C onst ı.x/, where ı is the shear layer thickness.
We consider again the thin boundary layer, i.e. the stress is approximately
equal to the wall stress w D 12 . Using (9.22) and (9.23) we get
2
2 d ux
w D l (9.25)
dy
r
d ux 1 w u
D D (9.26)
dy l y
The differential equation (9.26) reads
ux 1
D ln y C C C (9.27)
u
The constant C is approximately equal to 5:2. The region (9.27) is referred
to as the logarithmic region which takes place within 30 < y C < 300. The
region 5 < y C < 30 between the viscous and the logarithmic regions is called
the buffer layer. The region at y C > 300 is the wake region. The results of
the analysis are summarized in Fig. 9.24
99
98
Basic denitions of the statistical theory of
Chapter 10
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics turbulence
Chapter
Chapter 10
10
Basic definitions of the
Basic
Basic definitions
statistical theory of
definitions of the
of turbulence
the
statistical
statistical theory
theory of
of turbulence
turbulence
10.1 Reynolds averaging
10.1 Reynolds
Reynolds proposed to representaveraging
any stochastic quantity in turbulent flow as
10.1
the sum of its Reynolds
averaged part and averaging
fluctuation. For instance, this representation
Reynoldsforproposed
applied velocity to represent any
components readsstochastic quantity in turbulent flow as
Reynolds
the sum ofproposed to represent
its averaged any stochastic
part and fluctuation. Forquantity
instance,inthis
turbulent flow as
representation
the sum of its averaged
applied for velocity part
ux D ucomponents0 and fluctuation.
N x C ux I uyreads 0 For instance,
D uN y C uy I uz D uN z C uz Ithis
0 representation
(10.1)
applied for velocity components reads
The Reynolds uaveraged N x Cvelocities
u0x I uy areD uN y C uy0 I uz D uN z C u0z I
x D u (10.1)
ux D uN x C ux I uy D uN y C uy0 I uz D uN z C u0z9I
0
(10.1)
The Reynolds averaged velocities ZT are ZT >
>
>
uy dtI>
1 1
The Reynolds uNaveraged
x D lim
velocities are
ux dt I uN y D lim >
9
>
T !1 T ZT T !1 T ZT >
=
>
9
>
1 ZT 1 ZT >
uy dtI>
0 0
uN x D lim 1 ZT ux dt I uN y D lim 1 >
>
(10.2)
T !1 T
uN x D lim 1 0 ux dt I uN y D lim T !1 T
uy dtI>>
=
>
uN z D Tlim
!1 T T !1 T 0 >
>
=
uz dt >
; (10.2)
T !1 T Z 0T 0 >
>
>
>
(10.2)
uN z D lim 1 Z uz dt
1 T0
>
>
>
The averaged fluctuation !1 T
uN z D Tlim is zero ;
>
>
T !1 T 0
uz dt >
;
0
The averaged fluctuation is zero u0 D0
The averaged fluctuation is zero x;y;z
The root of the averaged square uof0 fluctuations is called root mean square,
x;y;z D 0
or r.m.s.. The quantity averagedu0x;y;z twiceDis0 equal to quantity averaged once
u D u.
The root of the averaged square of fluctuations is called root mean square,
The
orthe
If root
r.m.s.. ofThe
thequantity
turbulence averaged square
process isaveraged oftwice
statisticallyfluctuations istocalled
is equal(for
unsteady rootr.m.s
quantity
instance mean
averaged square,
once
is changed
or
uD
in r.m.s..
u. the definition of the Reynolds averaging (10.2) is not applicableonce
time), The quantity averaged twice is equal to quantity averaged and
u D
If theu.turbulence process is statistically unsteady (for instance r.m.s is changed
If
in the turbulence
time), processofisthe
the definition statistically
Reynolds101unsteady
averaging(for instance
(10.2) is notr.m.s is changed
applicable and
in time), the definition of the Reynolds averaging (10.2) is not applicable and
101
101
u0x;y;z D 0
The root of the averaged square of fluctuations is called root mean square,
or r.m.s.. The quantity averaged twice is equal to quantity averaged once
u D u.
If the turbulence process is statistically unsteady (for instance r.m.s is changed
in time), the definition of the Reynolds averaging (10.2) is not applicable and
should be extended using the concept of ensemble averaging. Within the en-
semble averaging the stochastic process 101 is repeated N times from the initial
state. The turbulent quantity u is measured at a certain time t N times.
The ensemble averaged quantity is then:
1 X
N
u.t / D lim ui .t /
N !1 N
i D1
u02 02 02
x D uy D uz (10.3)
The turbulence parameters are invariant with respect to the rotation of the
reference system. The turbulence is homogeneous in some fluid volume if
all statistical parameters are the same for all points in this volume, i.e.
u02 E D u02
x;y;z .x/ E C rE/. This equality can be written for all statistical
x;y;z .x
moments. The turbulence parameters are invariant with respect to the trans-
lation of the reference system.
u0i .x/u
E 0i .xE C rE/
E rE/ D
i i .x; (10.6)
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com u02 E
i .x/
100
A sample of the autocorrealtion function coefficient for scalar fluctuation f 0
102
E rE/ D ui .x/u
Rij .x; E j .xE C rE/ (10.4)
If i D j the correlation function Ri i is reffered as to the autocorrelation
function. In homogeneous turbulence Ri i depends only on the separation:
Basic denitions of the statistical theory of
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics turbulence
Rij .Er / D u0i .x/u
E j0 .xE C rE/ (10.5)
The coefficient of the autocorrelation function is changed between zero and
one:
u0i .x/u
E 0i .xE C rE/
E rE/ D
i i .x; (10.6)
u02 E
i .x/
102
f 0 .x/f
E 0 .xE C rE/
E rE/ D
f .x; (10.7)
f 02 .x/
E
at three different points A; B and C across the jet mixer is shown in Fig. 10.1.
In measurements presented in Fig. 10.1 the scalar f is the concentration of
the dye injected from the nozzle (see Fig. 10.1, low picture, right). The
change of the function has a certain physical meaning. Let us consider the
autocorrelation function with respect to the point C (blue line):
f 0 .rC /f 0 .rC C r/
f .rC ; r/ D (10.8)
f 02 .rC /
where r is the radial coordinate across the pipe. The f .rC ; rA / is negative. It
means the increase of the quantity f at the point C (f 0 .rC / > 0) is followed
by the decrease of this quantity at the point A (f 0 .rA / < 0) . This is true in
statistical sense, i.e. the most probable consequence of the increase f .rC / is
the decrease of f .rA /.
The correlation function and autocorrelation function can be written not
only for spatial separation but also for separation in time. For example, the
autocorrelation temporal
Download free eBooks function of the ui fluctuation is
at bookboon.com
101
103
where r is the radial coordinate across the pipe. The f .rC ; rA / is negative. It
means the increase of the quantity f at the point C (f 0 .rC / > 0) is followed
by the decrease of this quantity at the point A (f 0 .rABasic denitions
/ < 0) . Thisofisthe statistical
true in theory of
Lectures on computational
statistical fluidmost
sense, i.e. the dynamics
probable consequence of the increase f .rC / is turbulence
the decrease of f .rA /.
The correlation function and autocorrelation function can be written not
only for spatial separation but also for separation in time. For example, the
autocorrelation temporal function of the ui fluctuation is
u0i103
E t/u0i .x;
.x; E t C /
E / D
i i .x; (10.9)
u02 E t/
i .x;
Z1
E D
Lij .x/ E xj /dxj
i i .x; (10.10)
0
is the integral length. The integral lengths are estimations of the size of the
largest vortex in flow. A sample of the integral length of the scalar field f
along the jet mixer centerline (Fig. 10.1, right)
ZD=2
Lf .x/ D f .r/dr (10.11)
D=2
is shown in fig. 10.2, where f is the autocorrelation function across the jet
mixer, d is the nozzle diameter, D is the diameter of the closing pipe. Lf
is the estimation of the largest structure of the scalar field (in this case, the
size of the spot of colored liquid injected from the nozzle).
The integral of the temporal autocorrelation functions
Z1
E D
Ti .x/ E /d
i i .x; (10.12)
Need help with your 0
ZD=2
Basic denitions of the statistical theory of
Lf .x/ D
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics f .r/dr (10.11) turbulence
D=2
is shown in fig. 10.2, where f is the autocorrelation function across the jet
mixer, d is the nozzle diameter, D is the diameter of the closing pipe. Lf
is the estimation of the largest structure of the scalar field (in this case, the
size of the spot of colored liquid injected from the nozzle).
The integral of the temporal autocorrelation functions
Z1
E D
Ti .x/ E /d
i i .x; (10.12)
0
104
Figure 10.2: Distribution of the integral length of the scalar field along the
jet mixer centerline. [47].
103
Basic denitions of the statistical theory of
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics turbulence
u0l 105
.x/u0l .x C r/
f .r/ D ; (10.14)
u0l .x/u0l .x/
is the autocorrelation of the longitudinal velocity calculated in longitudinal
direction. For instance, the autocorrelation function of the ux fluctuation
calculated in x direction,
u0x .x/u0x .x C r/
f .r/ D ; (10.15)
u0x .x/u0x .x/
or the autocorrelation function of the uy fluctuation calculated in y direction:
uy0 .y/uy0 .y C r/
f .r/ D ; (10.16)
uy0 .y/uy0 .y/
The function f .r/ is the same in both cases (10.15) and (10.16). The au-
tocorrelaton function g.r/ is calculated for transversal velocities along any
direction
u0 .x/u0t .x C r/
g.r/ D t (10.17)
u0t .x/u0t .x/
For instance, the autocorrelation function of the ux fluctuation calculated in
y direction,
u0 .y/u0x .y C r/
g.r/ D x ; (10.18)
u0x .y/u0x .y/
or the autocorrelation function of the uy fluctuation calculated in x direction:
uy0 .x/uy0 .x C r/
g.r/ D ; (10.19)
uy0 .x/uy0 .x/
The function g.r/ is the same in both cases (10.18) and (10.19). The ve-
locities components used in the previous definitions are illustrated in Fig.
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
10.4. ui is the velocity pulsation vector, ui l is its projection on the direction
104
connecting two points (i.e. longitudinal direction), ui t is its projection on
the transversal direction. Products like ui t ui t are the correlations between
points 1 and 2.
or the autocorrelation function of the uy fluctuation calculated in x direction:
The function g.r/ is the same in both cases (10.18) and (10.19). The ve-
locities components used in the previous definitions are illustrated in Fig.
10.4. ui is the velocity pulsation vector, ui l is its projection on the direction
connecting two points (i.e. longitudinal direction), ui t is its projection on
the transversal direction. Products like ui t ui t are the correlations between
points 1 and 2.
106
The following relations are valid between g and f in the isotropic homoge-
neous turbulence (see [13]):
1 @f
gDf C r (10.20)
2 @r
Typical form of f and g is shown in Fig. 10.5. The change of the sign of g
function is due to the continuity equation of the velocity field. The integral
length calculated using f is twice as large as that calculated using g.
1 @2 f
f .r/ D 1 C 2
.0/r 2 C O.r 4 / (10.21)
2 @r
The parabola fitted to the curve f .r/ at r D 0 intersects the horizontal axis
at the point:
s
2
f D @2 f (10.22)
@r 2
.0/
Similar relations can be derived for the transversal autocorrelation
s
2
g D @2 g (10.23)
@r 2
.0/
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
Today the Taylor microscale is still in use in turbulent research although
it has no physical meaning. Very popular 106is the Reynolds number based on
the Taylor microscale
Re D u0 = (10.24)
@r 2
Re D u0 = (10.24)
which characterizes the state of the turbulence in the flow.
Z1
f .Er ; t/ D E t/e i kErE d kE
fO.k; (10.25)
1
The new function fO.k;E t/ is then known as the Fourier transform and/or
the frequency spectrum of the function f . The Fourier transform is also a
reversible operation:
Z1
E t/ D 1
fO.k;
E
f .Er ; t/e i k rE d rE (10.26)
8 3
1
The Fourier transformation can be also written for the correlation function:
Z1 Z1
E i kErE E 108
E D 1 E
Rij .Er / D ˚ij .k/e d k; ˚ij .k/ Rij .Er /e i k rE d rE (10.27)
8 3
1 1
Z1 Z1 Z1
1
ij .k1 / D Rij .r1 ; 0; 0/e i k1 r1 dr1 D ˚ij .k1 ; k2 ; k3 /d k2 d k3
2
1 1 1
(10.28)
Proof of the formula (10.28) The inverse Fourier transform of the function
Rij .r1 ; 0; 0/:
Z1
1
ij .k1 ; 0; 0/ D Rij .r1 ; 0; 0/e i k1 r1 dr1 (10.29)
2
1
Z1 Z1 Z1
E
Rij .r1 ; r2 ; r3 / D ˚ij .k1 ; k2 ; k3 /e i k rE d k1 d k2 d k3 (10.31)
1 1 1
Z1 Z1 Z1
Rij .r1 ; 0; 0/ D ˚ij .k1 ; k2 ; k3 /d k2 d k3 e i k1 r1 d k1 (10.32)
1 1 1
Z1 Z1
1 1 E kE D E kE
TKE D Ri i .0/ D ˚i i .k/d ˚i i .k/d (10.35)
2 2
1 0
The quantity
Z
E.k/ D E kE
˚i i .k/d (10.36)
E
jkj
Z1
TKE D E.k/d k (10.37)
0
Z1 Z1
1 1 E kE D E kE
TKE D Ri i .0/ D ˚i i .k/d ˚i i .k/d (10.35)
2 2
1 0
The quantity
Z
E.k/ D E kE
˚i i .k/d (10.36)
E
jkj
Z1
TKE D E.k/d k (10.37)
0
110
109
Basic denitions of the statistical theory of
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics turbulence
Figure 10.6: Kurtosis of the structure function for the concentration of the
scalar field obtained in the jet mixer. [47].
1 .x/2
p:d:f:.x/ D p e 2 2 (10.39)
2
where is the mean value of the stochastic value, the turbulence is Gaussian.
In reality, the most of the turbulence parameters are not Gaussian. The
deviations from the Gaussian turbulence is characterized by the kurtosis
Kurt and skewness S k. The kurtosis
h.u2l u1l /4 i
Kurt D (10.40)
.h.u2l u1l /2 i/2
is three for the Gaussian turbulence. Big values of the kurtosis means that
the p.d.f. distribution of the structure function S1 .l/ D hu2l u1l i is very
flat. The kurtosis is also often called as flatness. If kurtosis for small l 0
is big, it means that the field of the stochastic field is very intermittent. Big
differences are possible even if the separation between two points l is small.
The p.d.f. function has long tails in this case. A sample of kurtosis for the
scalar structure function S.x/ D f .x C r/ f .x/ is given in Fig.10.6.
The skewness
h.u2l u1l /3 i
Sk D 111 (10.41)
.h.u2l u1l /2 i/3=2
is zero for the Gaussian process. For the isotropic turbulence the skewness
of the derivative
l 3
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com h @u
@l
i
Sk D h i (10.42)
l 2 3=2
h @u 110
i
@l
are more probable than positive ones. Please prove that the skewness (10.42)
h.u2l u1l / i
S k D h.u2l u1l2/33 i3=2 (10.41)
S k D .h.u 2l2l
h.u u1l/2/i/i3=2
u1l (10.41)
S k D .h.u2l u1l /2 i/3=2 (10.41)
is zero for the Gaussian process..h.u For u1lisotropic
2l the / i/ turbulence the skewness
is zero for the Gaussian process. For the isotropic turbulence theofskewness
Basic denitions the statistical theory of
of
is the
zero
Lectures
derivative
for the Gaussian process.
on computational fluid dynamics For the isotropic turbulence the skewness turbulence
of the derivative
of the derivative l 3
h @u 3 i
S k D h h @u @ll i
@u
@ll 3i3=2 (10.42)
S k D h h@u@l 2 ii3=2 (10.42)
h
S k D hh @u l
i
2 i
@l i 3=2
@u l (10.42)
@ll 2
h @l i
is equal to 0:5. Physically it means that negative values of the derivative @u l
is equal to 0:5. Physically it means that negative values of the derivative @u @ll
@ll
areequal
is more probable than positive
0:5. Physically ones.that
Please provevalues
that the skewness (10.42)
@u
are moretoprobable it means
than positive ones. Please negative
prove that the of the derivative
skewness (10.42)
@l
is
arethe skewness
more probableof the structure
than positive functions
ones. of the
Please firstthat
prove order
the .l/ D hu2l(10.42)
S1skewness u1l i
is the skewness of the structure functions of the first order S1 .l/ D hu2l u1l i
calculated
is the skewnessat l ! 0. structure functions of the first order S1 .l/ D hu2l u1l i
of the
calculated at l ! 0.
calculated at l ! 0.
Exercise 1.
Exercise 1.
Calculate
Exercise the
1. Reynolds averaged values of the time dependent signals
Calculate the Reynolds averaged values of the time dependent signals
Calculate the Reynolds averaged values of the time dependent signals
u.t/ D cos2 t;
u.t/ D cos22 t;
u.t/ D sin
cos t;t;
t;
u.t/ D sin
1t; t;
u.t/ D sin t 1;
u.t/ D 1 t; t 1;
u.t/ D 1 0; t; ttt > 1;
1:
u.t/ D 0; > 1:
0; t > 1:
Solution:
Solution:
Solution:
1
u.t/ D 1 ;
u.t/ D 21 ;
u.t/ D 2 ;
u.t/ D 0;
2
u.t/ D 0;
u.t/ D 0;
u.t/ D 0:
u.t/ D 0:
u.t/ D 0:
Exercise 2.
Exercise 2.
Find the Reynolds
Exercise 2. stresses for the isotropic turbulence.
Find the Reynolds stresses for the isotropic turbulence.
Find the Reynolds stresses for0
0the
1
isotropic turbulence.
2 r12 r13 1
0 2 r12 r13 1
@
@rr221 rr22 r13 A
12 r23 A
21 r22 r23
@rr31
21
rr32
22
rr33
23
A
r31 r32 r33
r31 r32 r33
Solution: 0 1
Solution: 02 0 01
@202 020 0001
0
Solution:
A
@0 2 0A
@00 02 20A
0 0 2
0 0 2
112
112
112
Exercise 2.
Find the Reynolds stresses for the isotropic turbulence.
0 1
2 r12 r13
@r21 r22 r23 A
r31 r32 r33
Solution: 0 1
2 0 0
@0 2 0A
0 0 2
Exercise 3.
Calculate
Exercise the 112of the isotropic turbulence, if r33 D 1
3. turbulent kinetic energy
Calculate the turbulent kinetic energy of the isotropic turbulence, if r33 D 1
Solution:
Solution: k D 3=2
k D 3=2
Exercise 4.
Relation
Exercisebetween
4. longitudinal autocorrelation function
Relation between longitudinal autocorrelation function
ul .x/ul .x C r/
f .r/ D
.x C r/
u2ll.x/
ul .x/u
f .r/ D
u2l .x/[13]
and energy density E.k/is given by formula
and energy density E.k/is given by formula [13]
Z1
2 sin kr
f .r/ D 2 Z1 E.k/k 2 r 2 . cos kr/d k (10.43)
u2l kr
sin kr
f .r/ D 2 0 E.k/k 2 r 2 . cos kr/d k (10.43)
ul kr
Energy density of the isotropic
0 decaying turbulence is described as E.k/ D
4 2
k ExpŒk . Calculate
Energy density of the isotropic decaying turbulence is described as E.k/ D
k 4 ExpŒk 2 . Calculate
longitudinal autocorrelation function f ,
longitudinal autocorrelation function f ,
integral length and
integral length and
Taylor microscale
Taylor microscale
for the isotropic decaying turbulence.
for the isotropic decaying turbulence.
Solution:
Solution:
Z1
2 sin kr
f .r/ D 2 Z1 E.k/k 2 r 2 . cos kr/d k D (10.44)
u2l 2 2 sin kr
kr
f .r/ D 2 0 E.k/k r . cos kr/d k D (10.44)
ul kr
0
Z1
2 2 2 sin kr 1p
2 ZeBooks at bookboon.com
2
D free
Download 1 ExpŒk k r . cos kr/d k D ExpŒr 2 =4
u2l kr
sin kr 4
1 p
D 0 ExpŒk 2 k 2 r 2 . cos112
kr/d k D ExpŒr 2 =4
u2l kr 4
0
113
113
Solution:
Z1
2 sin kr
f .r/ D 2 E.k/k 2 r 2 . cos Basic kD
kr/ddenitions (10.44)
of the statistical theory of
u kr
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
l
0 turbulence
Z1
2 sin kr 1p
D 2 ExpŒk 2 k 2 r 2 . cos kr/d k D ExpŒr 2 =4
ul kr 4
0
Z1
113
LD f .r/dr D
4
0
4
D
1=4
Exercise 5.
Calculate the probability density function of the time dependent signal
time 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
signal 0 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.05 0.65 0.2 0.78 0.43 0.98 0.67 0.92 0.55
Solution:
Exercise 6.
The velocity u was measured at N points across the pipe: uki , where i D 1; N
and k D 1; K is the time step number. Write a program to calculate the au-
tocorrelation function of u with respect to point N=2.
Solution:
uk;0 k
i D ui ui
1 X k
K
ui D ui
K
kD1
P
K
uk;0 k;0
i uN=2
kD1
R.i; N=2/ D
P
K
uk;02
N=2
kD1
114
113
Chapter 11
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Kolmogorov theory K41
Chapter 11
Chapter 11 theory K41
Kolmogorov
Kolmogorov theory K41
Kolmogorov theory K41
11.1 Physical background
11.1
One of thePhysical background
most outstanding results in turbulence theory was obtained by
11.1 Physical
Kolmogorov (s. Fig. 11.1)background
in 1941. The Kolmogorov theory known as K41
is
Onebased on the
of the mosthypothesis
outstanding of local isotropy
results of the turbulent
in turbulence theory was motion at small
obtained by
One
scales.of
Kolmogorovthe most
The (s. outstanding
physical model
Fig. 11.1) results
in behind
1941. The in turbulence
the Kolmogorov theory
Kolmogorov theory was
theoryknown obtained
is the as by
vortex
K41
Kolmogorov
cascado
is on the(s. hypothesis
based illustrated Fig.in11.1)
Fig. ofin 1941.
11.2.
localBig The Kolmogorov
vortices
isotropy of with theory
scales
the turbulent knownatassmall
(corresponds
L motion K41
to
is based
the
scales. on
waveThe the
numbers hypothesis
physical of local
in the
=Lmodel isotropy
Fourier
behind space)
the of break
the turbulent
Kolmogorov up theory motion
to small theatvortex
is ones, small
which
scales.
in
cascado The
turn split physical
into
illustrated even model
smaller
in Fig. behind
11.2. andBig the Kolmogorov
so vortices
on up towith
the smallestheory
scales is thewith
Lvortices
(corresponds vortex
the
to
cascado
scale
the wave illustrated
. One of the =L
numbers in Fig.
most 11.2.Fourier
important
in the Big vortices
vortex break
space) with scales
up mechanisms
break (corresponds
up to Lsmall isones, to
the vortex
which
theturn
in wavesplit
reconnection numbers
described
into in the and
above.
=Lsmaller
even Fourier
The space)
energy
so on upis tobreak up tofrom
transferred
the smalles small
bigones,
vortices which
vortices
with to
the
in turn
small
scale split
.ones into
Onealmost
of theeven smaller
without
most theand
important so The
on up
loss.vortex to the
massive
break smalles
up dissipation
mechanisms vortices with
"istakes
the the
place
vortex
scale . One
at small
reconnection of
vorticesthereferred
mostabove.
described important
to asThethevortex break
dissipative
energy upthe
or mechanisms
is transferred from bigis vortices
Kolmogorov the vortex
vortices.
to
reconnection
The real
small described
onesturbulent
almost above.
vortices
without are
the The energy
similar
loss. is these
transferred
Thetomassive from by
calculated
dissipation big vortices
Isazawa
" takes to
et
place
small
al.
at smallones
(Fig. almost
11.3).
vortices without
Vortices
referred tothe
are as loss.
displayed The massive
at three
the dissipative dissipation
different
or the " takes
time instants.
Kolmogorov place
The
vortices.
at small
upper
The real vortices
pictures arereferred
turbulent obtained
vorticesto are
as the
from dissipative
the
similar lower ones
to these or by
thefiltering
Kolmogorov
calculated vortices.
outIsazawa
by the hight
et
The(Fig.
al. real 11.3).
frequencies. turbulentseenvortices
As Vortices bigare are similar
vortices at to
are revealed
displayed these
three in calculated
low
different time by
frequency IsazawaThe
simulation.
instants. et
al. the
If
upper(Fig. 11.3). are
resolution
pictures Vortices
is obtainedare displayed
increased, more
from theandat three
more
lower onesdifferent
small scaletime
by filtering instants.
vortex
out the The
filaments
hight
upper
appears pictures
on the are obtained
place of big from
smooththe lower
vortices. ones by
Thus, filtering
frequencies. As seen big vortices are revealed in low frequency simulation. the out
most the hight
important
frequencies.
physical
If As seen
processes
the resolution big vortices
isduring the vortex
increased, morearebreak
revealed
and in
up are:
more low scale
small frequency
vortexsimulation.
filaments
If the resolution
appears is increased,
on the place more and
of big smooth more small
vortices. Thus,scalethe vortex filaments
most important
appears processes
physical on the place of big
during smoothbreak
the vortex vortices.
up are: Thus, the most important
Transfer
physical energy
processes fromthe
during large scales
vortex to small
break up are: ones and
Dissipation
Transfer energy from
of the largeinscales
energy smallto small ones and
vortices.
Transfer energy from large scales to small ones and
Dissipation of the energy in small vortices.
Dissipation of the energy in small vortices.
115
115
115
114
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Kolmogorov theory K41
116
X @u0i @uj0 2
"D C D 2sij sij (11.1)
2 i;j @xj @xi
@u0 @uj0
where sij D 12 . @xji C @xi
/ is the fluctuating rate of strain:
@ui
P D u0i uj0 (11.3)
@xj
Based on the dimension analysis, Prandtl and Kolmogorov proposed the
estimation of the integral length of the turbulent flow
k 3=2
117
L (11.4)
"
The formula (11.4) is valid for very high Reynolds numbers for the turbulence
being in the equilibrium, i.e. the production of the turbulence is compensated
by its dissipation, i.e. P D ".
D ˛ "ˇ ; u D ˛u "ˇ117
u
; D ˛ "ˇ (11.5)
The analysis of dimension allows one to derive the following dependences:
The Kolmogorov first similarity hypothesis reads:
k3=2
" u k1=2 (11.7)
L
some useful estimations can be derived from (11.6):
Very remarkable is the first formula defining the ratio between the smallest
and largest vortices in the flow. If L is, say one meter, and the fluctua-
tion 1m=s, the turbulent Reynolds number in water is Re t D 106 . The
Kolmogorov scale is in this case 32000 as less as the flow macroscale L. Es-
timations of the Kolmogorov scale in the jet mixer with nozzle diameter of
d D 1cm and closing pipe of D D 5cm diameter is shown in Fig. 11.4.
The Kolmogorov second similarity hypothesis reads:
Very remarkable is the first formula defining the ratio between the smallest
and largest vortices in the flow. If L is, say one meter, and the fluctua-
tion 1m=s, the turbulent Reynolds number in water is Re t D 106 . The
Kolmogorov scale is in this case 32000 as less as the flow macroscale L. Es-
timations of the Kolmogorov scale in the jet mixer with nozzle diameter of
d D 1cm and closing pipe of D D 5cm diameter is shown in Fig. 11.4.
The Kolmogorov second similarity hypothesis reads:
119
Figure
Figure11.4:
11.4:Distribution of the
Distribution ofKolmogrov scale along
the Kolmogorov the centerline
scale along theofcenterline
the jet mixer
of
and
the free jet [47].and
jet mixer Thefree
dissipation
jet. The ε is calculated
ratedissipation ratefrom k – ε model
" isthecalculated and the
from the
k " model estimation
experimental of the Miller and
and the experimental Dimotakis
estimatin (1991) εand
of Miller = 48(U 3
/d )((x – x(1991)
Dimotakis
d 0
)/d )–4.
" D 48.Ud3 =d /..x x0 /=d /4 .
k 5=3
E.k/ D ˛"2=3119 (11.10)
where ˛ 1:5 is the constant.
Figure 11.4: Distribution of the Kolmogorov scale along the centerline of
the jet mixer and free jet. The dissipation rate " is calculated from the
k " model and the experimental estimatin of Miller and Dimotakis (1991)
Lectures on computational
3 4
fluid dynamics Kolmogorov theory K41
" D 48.U d =d /..x x0 /=d / .
The inertial subrange and dissipation range belong to the universal equilib-
120
rium range. Three corresponding ranges can be distinguished in the distribu-
tion of the energy density over the wave numbers k Fig. 11.6. The presence
of the inertial and dissipation subranges was confirmed in numerous exper-
imental measurements performed after development of the K41 theory (see
Fig. 11.7, 11.8).
Figure 11.5: Three typical scale ranges in the turbulent flow at high Reynolds
numbers.
120
Figure 11.5: Three typical scale ranges in the turbulent flow at high Reynolds
numbers.
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Kolmogorov theory K41
Figure 11.6: Three typical ranges of the energy density spectrum in the
turbulent flow at high Reynolds number. 1- energy containing range, 2-
inertial subrange, 3- dissipation range.
121
www.sylvania.com
We do not reinvent
the wheel we reinvent
light.
Fascinating lighting offers an infinite spectrum of
possibilities: Innovative technologies and new
markets provide both opportunities and challenges.
An environment in which your expertise is in high
demand. Enjoy the supportive working atmosphere
within our global group and benefit from international
career paths. Implement sustainable ideas in close
cooperation with other specialists and contribute to
influencing our future. Come and join us in reinventing
light every day.
Light is OSRAM
122
Figure 11.8: Experimental confirmation of the Kolmogorov law for the con-
centration fluctuations in the jet mixer. Measurements of the LTT Rostock.[47].
123
123
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Kolmogorov theory K41
Figure 11.9: Three main methods of turbulent flows modelling.
360°
Sq .l/ D h.u2l u1l /q i (11.11)
.
has the following asymptotic behaviour at small l
Fig. 11.11 shows that the predictions of Kolmogorov and Obukhov deviate
thinking
Sq .l/ ."l/q .l/ q (11.12)
from measurement data. The reason of the discrepancy is the physical phe-
124
360°
thinking . 360°
thinking .
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers Dis
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers © Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
After the deviation between the K-41 and measurement was documented,
Kolmogorov tried to improve his theory. New Kolmogorov theory called as
K-62 was published in 1962.
New theory is based on two following assumptions:
Assumption 1:
Sq .l/ D< ılq >< "q=3
l > l q=3 ;
q (11.13)
q D C q=3 < "ql > l q
3
Assumption 2:
.ln"a/2
P ."l / D ce 2 2
l a D lnN"
l2 D A C ln.L= l/
q (11.14)
q D q.1 q/ &q D C q.3 q/ < "2l > l
2 3 18
Unfortunately, various experiments showed later that the second assumption
is proved to be wrong.
11.6.1 Exercises
Exercise 1. Calculate the Reynolds averaged values of the time dependent
signals
u.t/ D cos2 t;
D sin t;
u.t/ 125
1 t; t 1;
u.t/ D
0; t > 1:
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
Solution:
1
u.t/ D ;125
2
u.t/ D 0;
u.t/ D 0:
u.t/ D sin t;
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics 1 t; t 1; Kolmogorov theory K41
u.t/ D
0; t > 1:
Solution:
1
u.t/ D ;
2
u.t/ D 0;
u.t/ D 0:
Solution: 0 1
2 0 0
@0 2 0A
0 0 2
ul .x/ul .x C r/
f .r/ D
u2l .x/
Taylor microscale
Taylor microscale
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Kolmogorov theory K41
for the isotropic decaying turbulence.
Solution:
Z1
2 sin kr
f .r/ D 2 E.k/k 2 r 2 . cos kr/d k D (11.16)
ul kr
0
Z1
2 sin kr 1p
D 2 ExpŒk 2 k 2 r 2 . cos kr/d k D ExpŒr 2 =4
ul kr 4
0
Z1
LD f .r/dr D
4
0
4
D
1=4
time 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
signal 0 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.05 0.65
time 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
signal 0.2 0.78 0.43 0.98 0.67 0.92 0.55
using the increment 0.2.
Solution:
Solution:
127k
uk;0
i D ui ui
1 X k
K
ui D ui
K
kD1
P
K
uk;0 k;0
i uN=2
kD1
R.i; N=2/ D
P
K
uk;02
N=2
kD1
127
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes Equation (RANS)
Chapter 12
Chapter 12
Chapter 12
Reynolds Averaged Navier
Reynolds
Stokes Averaged
Equation Navier
(RANS)
Reynolds Averaged Navier
Stokes Equation (RANS)
Stokes Equation (RANS)
According to the Reynolds averaging each fluctuating quantity is represented
as the sum of the averaged value and its fluctuation:
According to the Reynolds averaging each fluctuating quantity is represented
According
as the sumtoofthe
the Reynolds
averaged averaging eachfluctuation:
fluctuating quantity is represented
ux D uN x C u0xvalue
I u and D uNitsy C uy I
0
uz D uN z C u0z (12.1)
as the sum of the averaged valueyand its fluctuation:
where the averaged
ux D u part
N x Cisu0xdefined
I uy D as:uN y C u0 I uz D uN z C u0 (12.1)
y z
0 0 0
ux D uN x C ux I uy D uN y C uy I uz D uN z C uz (12.1)
where the averaged part is defined as:
where the averaged Z part is defined as:
T ZT Z T
1 1 1
uN x D ux dtI uN y D uy dtI uN z D uz dt (12.2)
T ZT T ZT T ZT
1 Z0T 1 Z0T 1 Z0T
uN x D 1 ux dtI uN y D 1 uy dtI uN z D 1 uz dt (12.2)
uN x D Taveraging
The Reynolds u x dtI has uN the
y D T
followingu y dtI N
u D
properties:
z
T u z dt (12.2)
T 0 T 0 T 0
0 0 0
The Reynolds
averaged averaging
fluctuation is the
has zero:following properties:
The Reynolds averaging has the following properties:
averaged fluctuation is zero: fN 0 D 0 (12.3)
averaged fluctuation is zero:
double averaged quantity is equal fN 0 to
D once
0 averaged one: (12.3)
fN 0 D 0 (12.3)
double averaged quantity is equal N
f D N
to fonce averaged one: (12.4)
double averaged quantity is equal to once averaged one:
averaged sum is equal to the sum fN D of f
N
averaged: (12.4)
N
f D fN (12.4)
averaged sum is equal to the Cg D
f sum of f N C gN
averaged: (12.5)
averaged sum is equal to the sum of averaged:
We will turn
operators your CV
of averaging and into C g D fN C gNcommutate:
fdifferentiation (12.5)
f C g D fN C gN (12.5)
an opportunity
operators of averagingof aand @flifetime
@fN
differentiation @fN
@f commutate:
operators of averaging and D ; D (12.6)
@t differentiation
@tN @x commutate:
@xN
@f @f @f @f
@f D @fN ; @f D @fN (12.6)
@t D @t ; @x D @x (12.6)
129
@t @t @x @x
129
129
Do you like cars? Would you like to be a part of a successful brand? Send us your CV on
We will appreciate and reward both your enthusiasm and talent. www.employerforlife.com
Send us your CV. You will be surprised where it can take you.
fN D fN (12.4)
The starting point of the derivation of the RANS equation is the original
Navier Stokes (NS) equation:
d uN x
u0x uy0 D t (12.21)
dy
The last term in (12.20) is introduced to keep the consistency. Indeed the
sum of three diagonal terms of the Reynolds matrix is equal to the turbulent
kinetic energy k D 12 u0i u0i . Without this term the sum of r.h.s of (12.20)
would result in the sum of the diagonal terms of the strain rate matrix
S11 C S22 C S33 which is zero due to the continuity equation. It would
be wrong result because k ¤ 0. The turbulent closures (12.20) are referred
to as the isotropic because the coefficient t is equal for all matrix elements
Rij .
While the kinematic viscosity depends on the liquid, the turbulent kinematic
viscosity depends on the turbulent state of the flow. According to estimation
of Landau the ratio of the turbulent kinematic viscosity to the kinematic one
is proportional to the ratio of the Reynolds number to that corresponding to
the transition for this type of flow
t = Re=Recri t (12.22)
The URANS closure models are subdivided into algebraic and differential
ones. The most prominent model amount the algebraic models is the Prandtl
model described above. The disadvantages of the algebraic models are:
132
they are good only for the simplest flow,
2
@ @ 1 @ @ Cb2 d d
C uNj D Cb1 Cw1 fw C . C / C
@t @xj d @xk @xk dxk dxk
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
(12.23)
where
132
2
@ @ 1 @ @ Cb2 d d
C uNon
Lectures D Cb1 fluid
j computational Cdynamics
w1 fw C . C /
Reynolds AveragedCNavier Stokes Equation (RANS)
@t @xj d @xk @xk dxk dxk
(12.23)
where
6 1=6
3 1 C Cw3
f1 D 3 3
; f2 D ; fw D g 6 6
;
C C1 1 C f1 g C Cw3 (12.25)
6
D ; g D r C Cw2 .r r/; rD 2 2
k d
p 1 @uN i @uNj
D S C 2 2 f2 ; S D 2˝ij ˝ij ; ˝ij D (12.26)
k d 2 @xj @xi
Within the more advanced k " model the turbulent kinetic energy and the
dissipation rate are calculated from the transport equations:
9
@k @k @ t @k @uN i >
>
C uNj D C 133 C ij " >
=
@t @xj @xj k @xj @xj
(12.27)
@" @" @ t @" C"1 " @uN i C"2 "2 >
>
C uNj D C C ij >
;
@t @xj @xj " @xj k @xj k
If k and " are known the turbulent viscosity t can be found from the di-
mension analysis, applied to the dissipation rate
133
Chapter 13
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
Reynolds Stress Model (RSM)
Chapter 13
Chapter
Reynolds13
Stress Model (RSM)
Reynolds Stress Model (RSM)
Reynolds Stress Model (RSM)
13.1 Derivation of the RSM Equations
13.1
13.1.1 Derivation
Step 1 of the RSM Equations
13.1 Derivation of the RSM Equations
The k t h Step
13.1.1 Navier-Stokes
1 equation
13.1.1 Step 1
@uk
The k t h Navier-Stokes @
equation 1 @p 1 @
C .uj uk / D C j k (13.1)
The k t h Navier-Stokes
@t equation
@x j @xk @xj
@uk @ 1 @p 1 @
is multiplied with @u C @ .ucomponent
thek velocity j uk / D 1 u@p i C 1 @ j k (13.1)
@t C @xj .u u / D @xk C @xj (13.1)
@t @xj
j k
@xk @xj
jk
is multiplied with @uthe
k @
velocity component u i 1 @p 1 @
ui C .uj uk / D ui C j k (13.2)
is multiplied with @tthe velocity
@xj component
ui @xk @xj
@uk @ 1 @p 1 @
ui @u C
The i t h equation is .uj uk /
multiplied
@ D uki th1velocity
with @p @ j k
C 1component: (13.2)
ui @tk @x
C j .uj uk / D ui @x k C @x j (13.2)
@t @xj @xk @xj
jk
The i t h equationi is multiplied with k th velocity component:
@u @ 1 @p 1 @
uk C .uj ui / D uk C j k (13.3)
The i t h equation
@t is multiplied
@xj with k thvelocity
@xi component:
@xj
@ui @ uk 1 @p C 1 @ j k
uk @u (13.2)
Resulting equations C @ and i / D are
.uj u(13.3) then1 sumed:
@p 1 @ (13.3)
uk @t C @xj .uj ui / D uk @xi C @xj j k
i
(13.3)
@t @xj @xi @xj
Resulting equations (13.2) and (13.3) are then sumed:
@.ui uequations
Resulting k/ @.u(13.2)
i uk uj /and (13.3) @p are then @p sumed:@j k @j i
C D ui uk C ui C uk (13.4)
@t @xj @xk @xi @xj @xj
@.ui uk / @.ui uk uj / @p @p @j k @j i
@.u C @.u u u / D ui @p uk @p C ui @ C uk @ (13.4)
@ti uk / of
Substitution C Reynolds
i jk jdecomposition
@x D ui @xk uk @xi C ui @xj C uk @xj
jk ji
(13.4)
@t @xj @xk @xi @xj @xj
Substitution of u Reynolds 0
decomposition 0 0
i D u N i C ui ; p D pN C p ; j i D Nj i C j i (13.5)
Substitution of Reynolds decomposition
into the equation ui (13.4)
D uN i Cresults
u0i ; p inD pN C p 0 ; D N C 0 (13.5)
ji ji ji
ui D uN i C ui ; p D pN C p 0 ; j i D Nj i C j0 i
0
(13.5)
into the equation (13.4) results in 135
into the equation (13.4) results in
135
135
13.1.2 Step 2
The k t h Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes equation
@uN k @ @pN @
C .uNj uN k / D C .Nj k uj0 u0k / (13.7)
@t @xj @xk @xj
is multiplied with the i th component of averaged velocity
@uN k @ @pN @ 0 0
uN i C .uNj uN k / D uN i C .Nj k uj uk / (13.8)
@t @xj @xk @xj
Again the i th Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes equation is multiplied with
the k t h component of averaged velocity
@uN i @ @pN @ 0 0
uN k C .uNj uN i / D uN k C .Nj k uj ui / (13.9)
@t @xj @xi @xj
The sum of two last equations reads
@.uN i uN k / @.uN i uN k uNj / @pN @pN @.Nj k uj0 u0k / @.Nj i uj0 u0i /
C D uN i uN k CuN i CuN k
@t @xj @xk @xi @xj @xj
(13.10)
13.1.3 Step 3
Subtracting the last equation from (13.6) results in
@ 0 0
@ 0 0
@ 0 0 0 0
@p 0 0
@p 0
.u
Download
u /
i free C . N
u j u u
i k /
k eBooks at bookboon.com C .u u u
i j k / D ui u k C
@t @xj @xj @xk @xi
(13.11)
@j0 k @j0 i @uN135
i @uN k
C u0i C u0k uj0 u0k uj0 u0i
@xj @xj @xj @xj
136
@.uN i uN k / @.uN i uN k uNj / @pN @pN @.Nj k uj0 u0k / @.Nj i uj0 u0i /
C D uN i uN k CuN i CuN k
@t @xj @xk @xi @xj @xj
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Reynolds Stress Model (RSM)
(13.10)
13.1.3 Step 3
Subtracting the last equation from (13.6) results in
@ @ @ @p 0 @p 0
.u0i u0k / C .uNj u0i u0k / C .u0i uj0 u0k / D u0i u0k C
@t @xj @xj @xk @xi
(13.11)
@j0 k @j0 i @uN i @uN k
C u0i C u0k uj0 u0k uj0 u0i
@xj @xj @xj @xj
0
@p 0 @p 0 @ui @u0k @ @
u0i 0
uk Dp 0 C ıj k 0 0
.u p / C ıij 0 0
.u p /
@xk @xi @xk @xi @xj i @xj k
(13.12)
@j0 k @j0 i @2 u0k @2 u0i @2 0 0 @u0i @u0k
u0i Cu0k 0
D ui 0
Cuk 2 D 2 ui uk 2 (13.13)
@xj @xj @xj2 @xj @xj @xj @xj
we get the Reynolds stress model equation
@ @ @
.u0i u0k / C .uNj u0i u0k / C .u0i uj0 u0k / D
@t @xj @xj
0
0
@ui @u0k @ 0 0
@ 0 0
p C ıj k .u p / C ıij .u p / C
@xk @xi @xj i @xj k
@2 0 0 @u0i @u0k
C u u 2
@xj2 i k @xj @xj
@uN i @uN k
uj0 u0k
uj0 u0i
@xj @xj
which can be written in a compact form
@ 0 0 @ @
.ui uk / C uNj .u0i u0k / D Di k C Ri k C Pi k "i k (13.14)
@t @xj @xj
The physical meaning of terms on the r.h.s is as follows
@.u0i u0k / 1
Di k D u0i uj0 u0k C .ıj k u0i C ıij u0k /p 0 ! Diffusion (13.15)
@xj
1 @u0i @u0k
Ri k D C p0 ! Re distribution (energy exchange) (13.16)
@xk @xi
@uN i @uN k
Pi k D uj0 u0k uj0 u0i ! Generation (13.17)
@xj @xj
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
@u0i @u0k
"i k D 2 !136
Dissipation (13.18)
@xj @xj
137
1 @u0i @u0k
Ri k D C p0 ! Re distribution (energy exchange) (13.16)
@xk @xi
@uN i
Lectures on computational fluid0 dynamics
0
@uN k Reynolds Stress Model (RSM)
Pi k D uj uk uj0 u0i ! Generation (13.17)
@xj @xj
@u0i @u0k
"i k D 2 ! Dissipation (13.18)
@xj @xj
@.u0i u0k / 1
Di k D u0i uj0 u0k C .ıj k u0i C ıij u0k /p 0 (13.19)
@xj
is due to
@.u0i u0k /
(13.20)
@xj
The two last terms are unclosed. Here we face with the famous problem noted
first by Friedman and Keller (1924): Effort to derive the equations for the
second order moments u0i u0k results in the necessity of determination of new
unclosed terms including third order moments u0i uj0 u0k . Using the method
proposed by Friedman and Keller in 1924 it is possible to derive equations
for moments of arbitrary order. However, the equation for the m th order
will contain unclosed moments of the m C 1 th order. Impossibility of
obtaining of a closed system of equations for a finite number of moments,
known as the Friedman-Keller problem is a direct consequence of the nonlin-
earity of the Navier Stokes equations.
138
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
The two last terms are unclosed. Here we face with the famous problem noted
first by Friedman and Keller (1924): Effort to derive the equations for the
second order moments u0i u0k results in the necessity of determination of new
unclosed terms including third order moments u0i uj0 u0k . Using the method
proposed by Friedman and Keller in 1924 it is possible to derive equations
for moments of arbitrary order. However, the equation for the m th order
will contain unclosed moments of the m C 1 th order. Impossibility of
obtaining of a closed system of equations for a finite number of moments,
known as the Friedman-Keller problem is a direct consequence of the nonlin-
earity of the Navier Stokes equations.
The term
The term
138
@uN i @uN k
Pi k D uj00 u0k0 @uN i
uj00 u0i0 @uN k (13.24)
Pi k D uj uk @xj uj ui @xj (13.24)
@xj @xj
is responsible for the energy generation, i.e. the transport of the energy
is responsible
transfer for the energy
from averaged (mean)generation, i.e. theflow
flow to oscillating transport of the energy
(fluctuations). And,
transfer
finally, from averaged (mean) flow to oscillating flow (fluctuations). And,
finally,
@u0 @u0
"i k D 2 @ui0i @u0kk (13.25)
"i k D 2 @xj @xj (13.25)
@xj @xj
is the dissipation. This unclosed term is responsible for the transformation
is
of the
the dissipation. This energy
turbulent kinetic unclosed intoterm
theisinner
responsible
energy of forthe
theflow.
transformation
of the turbulent kinetic energy into the inner energy
RSM model based on equations (13.14) is used to determine the Reynoldsof the flow.
RSM model
stresses frombased on equations
the transport (13.14) It
equations. is used
is nottobased determine
on thetheBoussinesq
Reynolds
stresses from the transport equations. It is not based
approach and takes the anisotropy of stresses into account. This model is on the Boussinesq
approach
the best oneandamong
takes RANS
the anisotropy
models. of stresses into account. This model is
the best one among RANS models.
138
Chapter 14
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
Equations of the k – ε Model
Chapter
Chapter 14
Equations14of the k - " Model
Equations
Equations of
of the
the k
k -- "" Model
Model
14.1 Derivation of the k-Equation
14.1 Derivation
According to definitionof the k-Equation
14.1 Derivation of the k-Equation
According to definition k D u0k u0k =2 (14.1)
According to definition
Assuming i D k in the Reynolds stress0 model equations (13.14)
k D uk u0k =2 (14.1)
0 0
k D uk uk =2 (14.1)
Assuming@ i.uD0 uk0 /inCthe
uNj
@
Reynolds @
0 0 stress model equations (13.14)
.ui uk / D Di k C Ri k C Pi k "i k (14.2)
Assuming @t i Di kk in the@x Reynolds
j stress
@xj model equations (13.14)
@ 0 0 @ 0 0
@
ans summing
@ k / C uNj @for.uk=1,2
.ui uequations i uk / Dand ik C
@ 3Dwe Ri k Cthe
obtain "i k
Pi ktransport (14.2)
equations
@t .u0 u0 / C uNj @xj .u0 u0 / D @x j Di k C Ri k C Pi k "i k (14.2)
for the total
@t kinetic
i k energy
@xj k: i k
@xj
ans summing equations for k=1,2 and 3 we obtain the transport equations
ans the
for summing equations
total kinetic @kfor k:
energy @k and @3 we obtain the transport equations
k=1,2
C uNj D Ds C P "S (14.3)
for the total kinetic energy @t k: @xj @xj
@k @k @
where @k C uNj @k D @ Ds C P "S (14.3)
@t C uNj @xj D @xj Ds C P "S (14.3)
@t @xj @xj
where
whereD D @k C 1 ı u0 p 0 u0 k 0 ; k 0 D u0 u0 =2 Diffusion (14.4)
S jk k j k k
@xj
@k 1
DS D @k C 1 ıj k u0k p 0 uj0 k 0 ; k 0 D u0k u0k =2 Diffusion (14.4)
DS D @xj C ıj k u0k p 0 0 uj00 k@0u;N k k 0 D u0k u0k =2 Diffusion (14.4)
@xj P D uj uk Generation (14.5)
@xj
0 0
@uN k
0P D 0 uj uk @u Generation (14.5)
@ukP@uDk u0 u0 @xN jk Generation (14.5)
"S D j Dissipation
k
@xj ( Pseudodissipation) (14.6)
@xj @xj
@u0 @u0k
D @uk0the
The relation"Sbetween @u0true and Dissipation ( Pseudodissipation)
pseudodissipation is (14.6)
"S D @xjk @xjk Dissipation ( Pseudodissipation) (14.6)
@xj @xj0 0 2
The relation between the@u true @u and
j pseudodissipation
141 @ @ is
" D the ktrue
The relation between C and pseudodissipation
"S C isuj0 u0k (14.7)
2 @xj @xk @xj @xk
141
For large Reynolds numbers the true141 dissipation and the pseudodissipation
are equal.
@k 1 0 0 0 0
" "S (14.8)
More precise analysis shows that
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
" "S Re t1 (14.9)
Equations of the k – ε Model
where
p
Re t D kL= (14.10)
Two unknown terms in the diffusion
@k 1
DS D C ıj k u0k p 0 uj0 k 0 (14.11)
@xj
are determined by the gradient assumption
1 t @k
ıj k u0k p 0 uj0 k 0 D (14.12)
k @xj
where k is an empirical constant. Dissipation is determined by the energy
containing motion using the formula of Prandtl- Kolmogorov
@k @k @ t @k @uNj @uN i @uNj k 3=2
C uNj D C C t C CD (14.15)
@t @xj @xj k @xj @xi @xj @xi L
142
CLICK HERE
to discover why both socially
and academically the University
of Groningen is one of the best
places for a student to be
www.rug.nl/feb/education
@k @k @ t @k @uNj @uN i @uNj k 3=2
C uNj D C C t C CD (14.15)
@t @xj @xj k @xj @xi @xj @xi L
142
14.2 Derivation of the "-Equation
The Navier Stokes equation
@ @ui @u0i @ @.uN i C u0i / @u0i @ @u0i @u0i
D D D
@xk @t @xk @t @xk @xk @t @xk @xk
(14.18)
1 @ @u0i @u0i 1 @"s
D D
2 @t @xk @xk 2 @t
@ @ui @u0i @ @uN i @u0i @ 0
@uN i @u0i
uj D uNj C u C
@xk @xj @xk @xk @xj @xk @xk j @xj @xk
(14.19)
@ @u0i @u0i @ 0
@u0i @u0i
C uNj C u
@xk @xj @xk @xk j @xj @xk
@ @u0i @u0i @uNj @u0i @u0i @2 u0i @u0i
uNj D C uNj D
@xk @xj @xk @xk @xj @xk @xj @xk @xk
@uN i @u0i @u0i 1 @ @u0i @u0i
D C uNj D (14.20)
@xk @xj @xk 2 @xj @xk @xk
@uN i @u0i @u0i 1 @
D C uNj "s
@xk @xj @xk 2 @xj
@ 0
@u0i @u0i @uj0 @u0i @u0i @2 u0i @u0i
uj D C uj0 D
@xk @xj @xk @xk @xj @xk @xj @xk @xk
@uj0 @u0i @u0i 1 @ 0 @u0i @u0i
D C u D (14.21)
@xk @xj @xk 2 @xj j @xk @xk
@uj0 @u0
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com @u0i
i 1 @ 0
D C u "s
@xk @xj @xk 2 @xj j
141
143
@uN i @u0i @u0i 1 @ @u0i @u0i
D C uNj D (14.20)
@xk @xj @xk 2 @xj @xk @xk
@uN i @u0i @u0i 1 @
D C uNj "s
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
@xk @xj @xk 2 @xj
Equations of the k – ε Model
@ 0
@u0i @u0i @uj0 @u0i @u0i @2 u0i @u0i
uj D C uj0 D
@xk @xj @xk @xk @xj @xk @xj @xk @xk
@uj0 @u0i @u0i 1 @ 0 @u0i @u0i
D C u D (14.21)
@xk @xj @xk 2 @xj j @xk @xk
@uj0 @u0i @u0i 1 @ 0
D C u "s
@xk @xj @xk 2 @xj j
143
@ 0
@uN i @u0i @uN i @uj0 @u0i @2 uN i 0 @u0i
uj D C u
@xk @xj @xk @xj @xk @xk @xk @xj j @xk
(14.22)
1 @p @u0i 1 @p 0 @u0i
D
% @xi @xk % @xi @xk
0 0
1 @ @ @u 1 @ @ @ui
jN i C j0 i i
D j0 i (14.23)
% @xk @xj @xk % @xk @xj @xk
0
@ 0 @ @ui @uj0 @2 u0i
j i D C D (14.24)
@xj @xj @xj @xi @xj @xj
2 0 0 0 0
1 @ @ 0 @u0i @ @ ui @ui @ @ui @ui
j i D D D
% @xk @xj @xk @xk @xj @xj @xk @xj @xj @xk @xk
@ 1 @ @u0i @u0i @2 u0i @2 u0i
D
@xj 2 @xj @xk @xk @xj @xk @xj @xk
(14.25)
This gives:
@"s @"s @
C uNj D D" C P" "" (14.26)
@t @xj @xj
where
@"s @u0i @p 0
D" D uj0 "0s 2 (14.27)
@xj @xk @xi
0 0
@u0i @2 uN i @ui @uj @uN i @u0i @u0i @uN i
P" D 2uj0 2 C
@xk @xj @xk @xk @xk @xj @xj @xk @xk
(14.28)
@u0i @uj0 @u0i
2
@xj @xk @xk
@ @ T @" C"1 " @uN i C"2 "2
D" D C I P" D ij I "" D (14.30)
@xj @xj " @xj k @xj k
9
@k @k @ t @k @uN i >
>
C uNj D C C ij " >
=
@t @xj @xj k @xj @xj
(14.32)
@" @" @ t @" C"1 " @uN i C"2 "2 >
>
C uNj D C C ij >
;
@t @xj @xj " @xj k @xj k
Under assumption that the generation of the turbulent energy equals to the
its dissipation (the turbulence is in equilibrium, turbulent scales are in the
inertial range) Kolmogorov and Prandtl derived the relation between the
kinetic energy, the dissipation rate and the integral lengths L:
k 3=2
" (14.33)
L
From the dimension analysis
p
Life Science in Umeå – your(14.34)
choice!
t D C kL
follows
• 31 000 students • world class research • top class teachers
• modern campus • ranked p nr 1 by international
k2 students
t D C kL D C (14.35)
"
As soon as k and " are known the turbulent kinematic viscosity t is com-
– International
puted from (14.35) andBachelor’s programme
Reynolds stresses in Life Science
can be calculated from the Boussi-
– Master’s programme in Chemistry
nesq hypothesis and then substituted into the Reynolds averaged Navier
– Master’s
Stokes equations.programme
The problem in Molecular Biology
is mathematically closed.
The k " model is the classical approach, which is very accurate at large Re
numbers. At small Re number, for instance close to the wall, the approxima-
tions used in derivation of k " model equations are not valid. To overcome
this disadvantage various low Reynolds k " models were proposed.
145
Sweden
www.teknat.umu.se/english
p k2
t D C kL D C (14.35)
"
As soon as k and " are known the turbulent kinematic viscosity t is com-
puted from (14.35) and Reynolds stresses can be calculated from the Boussi-
nesq hypothesis and then substituted into the Reynolds averaged Navier
Stokes equations. The problem is mathematically closed.
The k " model is the classical approach, which is very accurate at large Re
numbers. At small Re number, for instance close to the wall, the approxima-
tions used in derivation of k " model equations are not valid. To overcome
this disadvantage various low Reynolds k " models were proposed.
@uN k
P D uj0 u0k D"
@xj
Let us consider two dimensional flow along a plate:
@uN x @uN x 2
P D u0x uy0 D t D" (14.36)
@y @y
@uN x
The derivative @y
can be expressed from the mixing length model of
Prandtl:
2 @uN x @ux
t D l ) D t = l 2 (14.37)
@y @y
From analysis of dimension we obtain
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
t D c k 1=2 L (14.38)
144
Using the Kolmogorov-Prandtl estimation " k 3=2 =L we get
c k 2
t D (14.39)
@uN x
The derivative @y
can be expressed from the mixing length model of
Prandtl:
2 @uNx
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics @ux
t D l ) D t = l 2 (14.37)
Equations of the k – ε Model
@y @y
From analysis of dimension we obtain
t D c k 1=2 L (14.38)
Using the Kolmogorov-Prandtl estimation " k 3=2 =L we get
c k 2
t D (14.39)
"
From (14.36) and (14.37) it follows
t D l 4=3 "1=3
and
@uN x "
w D t D % t 1=2 D
@y c k
c k 2 "
D% D %c1=2 k
" c1=2 k
ux 1
D ln Ey C
u x
x uN xp
u D
ln EypC
r r
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
w w x uN xp (14.41)
D 145 k 1=2 c 1=4
ln EypC
p
% %
%x uN xp kp1=2 c1=4
w D
ln EypC
"p D c3=4 kp3=2 = yp (14.40)
and turbulent kinetic energy
w can be found from the assumption that the first node is in the logarithmic
range:
ux 1
D ln Ey C
u x
x uN xp
u D
ln EypC
r r (14.41)
w w x uN xp
D C
kp1=2 c1=4
% % ln Eyp
%x uN xp kp1=2 c1=4
w D
ln EypC
Values "p (14.40) and w (14.41) are used within finite volume method when
the k " equations are written for the volumes adjacent to the wall. For
instance the generation term is calculated as
Z Z Z
147
@u @u
P dxdy D ij dxdy D w dxdy D w xuxp (14.42)
@y @y
American online
LIGS University
is currently enrolling in the
Interactive Online BBA, MBA, MSc,
DBA and PhD programs:
Chapter
Chapter 15
15 Simulation (LES)
Large Eddy
Large
Large Eddy
Eddy Simulation
Simulation (LES)
(LES)
15.1 LES filtering
Within the LES
15.1 LES all filtering
vortices are subdivided into large resolved vortices and
15.1
fine modelled LES
subgrid filtering
vortices. The border between vortices should lie within
Within
the the range.
inertial LES allThe vortices are subdivided
separation of fine scale intomotions
large resolved vortices
(small fine and
vortices)
Within
fine
from the ones
modelled
large LES isalldone
subgrid vortices
usingare
vortices. The
the subdivided into large
border filtering.
spatial between Letresolved
vortices
' be vortices
should
any and
lie within
stochastic
fine
the modelled
inertial
function which subgrid
range. vortices.
The separation
is represented The border
as theofsum fine of between
scale vortices
motions
filtered part(small should lie within
fine vortices)
and fluctuation:
the inertial
from range.
large ones The separation
is done of fine scale
using the spatial motions
filtering. Let ' (small finestochastic
be any vortices)
from large ones is done using
function which is represented as 'the the spatial
D sum
'Q C ' filtering.
0 Let ' be any
of filtered part and fluctuation: stochastic
function which is represented as the sum of filtered part and fluctuation:
where the filtered part is defined as
' D 'Q C ' 0
Z 1 Z' 1 DZ'Q 1 C '0
where the filtered'. Qpart
E t/isDdefined as
x; '.xE sE; t/F .Es /d sE
where the filtered part is defined Z1 Z as Z1
1
1 1 1
Q x;
Here F(Es ) is the filtering
'. E t/ Dfunction, Z 1 '.xE the
Z 1 Z 1satisfying sE;condition
t/F .Es /d sE
Q x;
'. E t/ D 1 1 1 '.xE sE; t/F .Es /d sE
Here F(Es ) is the filtering function, Z1
1Z11 Zsatisfying
1 1
the condition
Here F(Es ) is the filtering function, satisfying F .Es /d sE the
D 1 condition
Z
1
1 Z1 Z1
1 1
Z1 Z1 Z1 F .Es /d sE D 1
Three different filtering functions shown insEFig.
F .Es /d D 1 1: ideal filter, Gauss filter
1 1 1
and top hat filter. Ideal filter is applied in Fourier space. High frequencies
1 1 1
Three
are cutdifferent
off. Low filtering
frequencies functions shown in
are simulated Fig. 1:The
directly. idealtopfilter, Gauss
hat filter filter
is some
Three
and
kind ofdifferent
top hat filter.
smoothing filtering
Ideal functions
applied filter shown
is applied
in physical in Fourier
in
space. Fig.
The 1: ideal filter,
space.
simplest HighisGauss
case filter
frequencies
smoothing
and top
are cut
over hat filter.
off. neighboring
three Ideal
Low frequencies filter
points is applied in Fourier space. High
are simulated directly. The top hat filter is some frequencies
are cut
kind of off. Low frequencies
smoothing applied inare simulated
physical directly.
space. The topcase
The simplest hat is
filter is some
smoothing
kind of smoothing applied
over three neighboring points in 1
physical space. The simplest case is smoothing
'Qi D .'i 1 C a'i C 'i C1 /
over three neighboring points b
where b D 2 C a. 1
'Qi D 1 .'i 1 C a'i C 'i C1 /
'Qi D b .'i 1 C a'i C 'i C1 /
where b D Properties
2 C a. b
15.1.1 of filtering 149
where b D 2 C a.
The spatial filtering and Reynolds averaging 149 are both filtering operations.
LES spatial filtering has properties which 149 differ from these of Reynolds av-
eraging. First, the spatialy averaged quantity is not zero. Double filtering is
not equal once filtering:
e0 ¤ 0;
' 'QQ ¤ ';
Q
A
e0 D ' 'Q D 'Q 'QQ ¤ 0
'
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
147
Both conditions are compatible because
' A
e0 D ' 'Q D 'Q 'QQ ¤ 0
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Large Eddy Simulation (LES)
f
@'
D
@'Q e
@'
D
@'Q
@t @t @xj @xj
'f D 'f e e e
Q Q C ' Q 0 C ' 0 0
Q 0 C '
In the case of Reynolds averaging only the first and the last terms remain.
The properties of large and small scale motions are shown in the table 15.1.
C
@
@t
.ui / C
@
@xj
.ui uj / D
@
@xj
e
@uj
@xi
C
B E F e e
@ @ @ @ui @p
.ui / C .ui uj / D C gi (15.2)
@t @xj @xj @xj @xi
Introducing the term
e
ijS GS D ui uj uQ i uQj
the equation (15.2) is rewritten in the final form
@ @ @ @uQ i S GS @pQ
.uQ i / C .uQ i uQj / D ij C gi
@t @xj @xj @xj @xi
e
The term ijS GS D ui uj uQ i uQj is the subgrid stress (SGS) which considers
the effect of small fine vortices on large scale motion directly resolved on the
grid.
1
ij kk ıij 2 t SNij ;
3
Smagorinsky introduced the subgrid viscosity S GS instead of the turbulent
kinematic viscosity
1 S GS
ijS GS kk ıij 2S GS SQij ;
3
Expression for the subgrid viscosity was obtained by Smagorinsky with the
use of idea taken from the Prandtl mixing length theory. According to
Prandtl, the turbulent kinematic viscosity is proportional to the mixing
length squared and the velocity gradient
152 close to the wall
d uN x
t D l 2j j
dy
According to Smagorinsky, the subgrid viscosity is proportional to the mag-
Download
nitude offree
theeBooks
strainatrate
bookboon.com
tensor Sij and to a certain length lS squared
150 q
2 Q
S GS D lS jSij j; jSij j D 2SQij SQij
Q
Where
Prandtl, the turbulent kinematic viscosity is proportional to the mixing
length squared and the velocity gradient close to the wall
lS D CS
where CS is the constant of Smagorinsky.
The Smagorinsky constant was estimated first by Lilly. The main assumption
of the Lilly analysis is the balance between generation
SQ 2 7C "2=3 4=3
Substitution of the last formula into (15.3) results in:
Q 2 3=2 1=2
S
lS D 3=4
.7C / SQ 3
3=2
Assuming additionally that SQ 2 SQ 3 , the length lS and the Smagorinsky
constant are expressed through the Kolmogorov constant C D 1:5:
lS 1
CS D D 0:17
.7C /3=4
Advantages Disadvantages
Simple Laminar flow is not modelled
Low computational
Download costs Constant of Smagorinsky is constant in time and
free eBooks at bookboon.com
space
151
Stable Actually, the constant is chosen arbitrarily
depending on the problem under consideration
Good accuracy in ideal Sensible to grid
surements much better if a reduced value of the Smagorinsky constant is
used. Common values are 0:065 and 0:1.
Advantages
Lectures and disdvantages
on computational of the Smagorinsky model are summarized
fluid dynamics in
Large Eddy Simulation (LES)
the table 19.1.
Advantages Disadvantages
Simple Laminar flow is not modelled
Low computational costs Constant of Smagorinsky is constant in time and
space
Stable Actually, the constant is chosen arbitrarily
depending on the problem under consideration
Good accuracy in ideal Sensible to grid
conditions
Purely dissipativ
Damping of pulsation is too strong
the LES models are consistent when the resolution increases, i.e. ! 0.
• 2
nd place: MSc Global Supply Chain Management and
154 Change
Sources: Keuzegids Master ranking 2013; Elsevier ‘Beste Studies’ ranking 2012;
Financial Times Global Masters in Management ranking 2012
Maastricht
University is
the best specialist
university in the
Visit us and find out why we are the best! Netherlands
(Elsevier)
Master’s Open Day: 22 February 2014
www.mastersopenday.nl
e
ijS GS D ui uj uQ i uQj (15.4)
Germano introduces the double filtering or the test filtering designated as
OQ Here the tilde symbol means the first filtering with filter width
u D u.
whereas the hat symbol stands for the second filtering with filter width ∼ 2.
The symbol means the resulting double filtering. Using the definition (15.4)
we can write
_
b
e
Tijt est D ui uj ui uj D ui uj uOQ i uOQj (15.5)
Filtration of (15.4) results in
b
e b
OijS GS D ui uj uQ i uQj (15.6)
Subtracting (15.6) from (15.5) yields
b
Tijt est OijS GS D uQ i uQj uOQ i uOQj (15.7)
We suppose that the double filter width is small. Therefore the Smagorinsky
model is valid for both stresses ijS GS and Tijt est :
1 S GS 2
ijS GS kk ıij D 2 Cs jSQij j SQij D 2C mSijGS ;
3 (15.8)
1 t est 2
Tijt est Tkk ıij D 2 Cs O jSOQij j SOQij D 2C mtijest ;
3
The application of the double filter to ijS GS gives:
1 S GS
OijS GS Okk O SijGS
ıij D 2C m (15.9)
3
where C D CS2 . Here we supposed that the filtered product of the constant
C with mij is equal to the product of filtered mij with the same constant
b
Cm Cm
O
We introduce the tensor Lij which is equal to the difference between test
filter and once filtered original SGS stress:
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
153
b
Lij D Tijt est OijS GS D uQ i uQj uOQ i uOQj (15.10)
155
Oij
Okk ıij D 2C m O ij (15.9)
3
where C D CS2 . Here we supposed that the filtered product of the constant
C with mij is equal to the product of filtered mij with the same constant
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Large Eddy Simulation (LES)
b
Cm Cm
O
We introduce the tensor Lij which is equal to the difference between test
filter and once filtered original SGS stress:
b
Lij D Tijt est OijS GS D uQ i uQj uOQ i uOQj (15.10)
Mij D mtijest m
O SijGS
The system (15.11) is overdefined (six equations for one unknown coefficient
C ). To get an unique solution we multiply both the l.h.s. and r.h.s of (15.11)
with the tensor Sij . The final result for C is
Lij SQij
C D (15.12)
2Mij SQij
Use of (15.14) is problematic since the denumerator Mij SQij can become zero.
To overcome this difficulty Lilly proposed to determine the constant from the
condition of the minimum residual of the equation (15.11):
2
1
Q D Lij Lkk ıij 2CMij ! min (15.13)
3
The minimum is attained at the point with zero derivative of the functional
Q on the parameter C :
@Q 1
D 4Mij Lij Lkk ıij 2CMij D 0 (15.14)
@C 3
It follows directly from (15.14):
@2 Q
D 8Mij Mij > 0 (15.16)
@C 2
Theoretically the constant C can become negative. The case C < 0 and
S GS can be considered as the energy backscattering. However, this leads
to strong numerical instability. That is why the dynamic constant is limited
from below:
Mij Lij
C D max ;0 0 (15.17)
2Mij Mij
S GS D C2 jSQij j 0
Despite the fact that diffusion of the classic Smagorinsky model was sub-
stantially reduced by the dynamic choice of the Smagorinsky constant, the
Dynamic Smagorinsky model remains very diffusive. This disadvantage was
overcome within the similarity models. The main point of the similarity
model is the assumption that the statistical properties of the once filtered
field uQ i are identical to these of the double filtered field uQQ i . It is the case
if the filter width is small. The difference between once and double filtered
velocities is negligible, i.e. different scale motions are similar.
> Apply now
Let us consider uQj as the original (unfiltered) field. uQQj is the filtered field
and uQj uQQj is the pulsation (see Fig. 15.2). Then from the definition of the
subgrid stress one obtains redefine your future
e
ijS GS D uQ i uQj uQQ i uQQj
AxA globAl grAduAte
(15.18)
The formula (15.18) is the scale similarity model progrAm
proposed by Bardina et 2015
al. [16]. As seen the SGS stress can be calculated directly from the resolved
field uQ i .
- © Photononstop
157
Despite the fact that diffusion of the classic Smagorinsky model was sub-
stantially reduced by the dynamic choice of the Smagorinsky constant, the
Dynamic Smagorinsky model remains very diffusive. This disadvantage was
overcome within the similarity models. The main point of the similarity
model is the assumption that the statistical properties of the once filtered
field uQ i are identical to these of the double filtered field uQQ i . It is the case
if the filter width is small. The difference between once and double filtered
velocities is negligible, i.e. different scale motions are similar.
Let us consider uQj as the original (unfiltered) field. uQQj is the filtered field
and uQj uQQj is the pulsation (see Fig. 15.2). Then from the definition of the
subgrid stress one obtains
e
ijS GS D uQ i uQj uQQ i uQQj (15.18)
The formula (15.18) is the scale similarity model proposed by Bardina et
al. [16]. As seen the SGS stress can be calculated directly from the resolved
field uQ i .
157
15.6 Mixed similarity models
The experience shows that diffusion produced by the scale similarity mo-
del (15.18) is too low. The numerical calculations are often unstable using
this model. Taking the fact into account, that the diffusion of the Smagorin-
sky model is too high, it was decided to combine the Samgorinsky and scale
similarity models to get the proper diffusion. The advantages and disadvan-
tages of both models are summarized as follows
The idea combine models to strengthen the advantages and to overcome dis-
advantages of both models. The hybrid model called as the mixed similarity
model is written as
2
e
ijr D uQ i uQj uQQ i uQQj 2 CS jSj
Q SQij (15.19)
The mixed model can be derived in a more formal way. For that the velocity
decomposition into filtered and pulsation parts:
e e e e e e
ui uj D .uQ i C u0i /.uQj C uj0 / D uQ i uQj C u0i uQj C uj0 uQ i C u0i uj0 (15.20)
S GS
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
ij e
D ui uj uQ i uQj (15.21)
156 mixed model:
Finally we have Leonard’s formulation of the
e e
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics
e e e e
ui uj D .uQ i C ui /.uQj C uj / D uQ i uQj C u0i uQj C uj0 uQ i C u0i uj0
0 0 Large Eddy Simulation (LES)
(15.20)
e
ijS GS D ui uj uQ i uQj (15.21)
Finally we have Leonard’s formulation of the mixed model:
The classical definition of the SGS stresses possesses the Galilean invariance.
Indeed, let V be the speed of the reference system. The velocity relative to
the reference system is
WE D uE C VE (15.24)
The SGS stress does not depend on the reference system speed:
A
Wi Wj WQ i WQj D
G GG
D .uQ i C Vi C u0i /.uQj C Vj C uj0 / .uQ i C Vi C u0i /.uQj C Vj C uj0 / D
e CC e
D .uQ i C u0i /.uQj C uj0 / .uQ i C u0i /.uQj C uj0 / D ui uj uQ i uQj
(15.25)
A e
WQ i WQj WQ i WQj D uQ i uQj uQ i uQj Vi uQ0j Vj uQ0 i (15.26)
Germano proposed an alternative formulation
e
L0ij D uQ i uQj uQQ i uQQj is the Leonard stress
Download e e
Cij D uQ i uj C ui uQj uQQ i uQ0j uQ0 i uQQj is the Cross stress
0
0 free eBooks at0 bookboon.com
e
Rij0 D u0i uj0 uQ0 i uQ0j is157
the Reynolds stress
2
Q SQij
Cij0 C Rij0 D 2 CS jSj (15.28)
A e
WQ i WQj WQ i WQj D uQ i uQj uQ i uQj Vi uQ0j Vj uQ0 i (15.26)
Germano proposed an alternative formulation
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Large Eddy Simulation (LES)
ijS GS D L0ij C Cij0 C Rij0 (15.27)
e
L0ij D uQ i uQj uQQ i uQQj is the Leonard stress
0 e e
Cij D uQ i uj C ui uQj uQQ i uQ0j uQ0 i uQQj is the Cross stress
0 0
e
Rij0 D u0i uj0 uQ0 i uQ0j is the Reynolds stress
2
Q SQij
Cij0 C Rij0 D 2 CS jSj (15.28)
Direct test of quality of subgrid stresses is the a-priori test. First, the subgrid
stress is calculated at each time instant from the definition
e
ijS GSdef D ui uj uQi uQj (15.29)
Then the subgrid stress is computed again at each time instant from any
model, say Smagorinsky one
1 S GS mod
ijS GS mod kk ıij D 2.CS /2 jSQij jSQij (15.30)
3
The subgrid stresses ijS GSdef and ijS GS mod averaged in time are compared
each with other. If
161
Chapter
Chapter 16 16
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Hybrid URANS-LES methods
Chapter 16
Chapter
Hybrid 16
Hybrid URANS-LES
URANS-LES methods
methods
Hybrid URANS-LES methods
Hybrid URANS-LES
16.1 Introduction
methods
16.1 Introduction
As
16.1 discussed above, the most promising approach to resolve the flow un-
Introduction
As discussed above, the most promising approach to resolve the flow un-
steadiness is the Large Eddy Simulation (LES), which is already widely used
16.1
steadiness Introduction
is the Large Eddy Simulation (LES), which is already widely used
for research purposes. Typical Reynolds numbers in engineering are very
for research purposes.
As discussed above, theTypical Reynolds approach
most promising numbers in to engineering
resolve the flow are very
un-
large even at model scales. The grid resolution necessary for a pure LES
large even
steadiness at
is themodel
Large scales.
Eddy The grid
Simulation resolution
(LES),
As discussed above, the most promising approach to resolve the flow un- necessary
which is for
already a pure
widely LES
used
is so huge that it makes the direct application of LES impossible (see Sec.
is
for soresearch
huge is
steadiness that itLarge
purposes.
the makes the Simulation
Typical
Eddy direct application
Reynolds numbers
(LES), of LES
which impossible
inisengineering
already widely (see Sec.
are used
very
16.4). A practical solution of this problem is the use of hybrid URANS-LES
16.4).
large A practical
even
for research atpurposes.
model solution
scales. of The
Typical thisReynolds
problem is the use
grid resolution
numbers of engineering
hybrid
necessary
in forURANS-LES
a pure LES
are very
methods, where the near body flow region is treated using URANS and far
methods,
is
large evenwhere
so huge that itthe
at model near
makes body
the
scales. flow
direct
The region
application
grid is treated
resolution using
ofnecessary
LES URANS
impossible
for a pure andLES
(see far
Sec.
flow regions are treated with LES.
flow
is so regions
16.4). huge are it
A practical
that treated
makeswith
solution theof LES.
this problem
direct is theofuse
application LESof hybrid
impossibleURANS-LES
(see Sec.
methods, where the near body flow region is treated
16.4). A practical solution of this problem is the use of hybrid URANS-LES using URANS and far
According
flow regions to Peng [17] the hybrid techniques can be subdivided into flow
methods,
According toare
where Pengtreatednearwith
the [17] body
the LES.flow techniques
hybrid region is treated
can beusing URANSinto
subdivided andflowfar
matching and turbulence matching methods. Within the flow matching
flow regions
matching andareturbulence
treated with LES. methods. Within the flow matching
matching
methods the interface between URANS and LES is explicitly defined. LES
methods
Accordingthe to interface
Peng [17]between the hybrid URANS and LES
techniques canis be
explicitly
subdivided defined.
into LES
flow
filtered equations are solved in the LES region, whereas URANS equations
filtered
matching equations
and are
turbulence solved in the
matching LES region,
methods.
According to Peng [17] the hybrid techniques can be subdivided into flow whereas
Within URANS
the flow equations
matching
are solved in the URANS domain. The flow parameters (velocities, kinetic
are solvedthe
methods
matching in interface
and the URANS
turbulence domain.
between URANS
matching The flow LES
and
methods. parameters (velocities,
is explicitly
Within the defined.
flow kinetic
matchingLES
energy) are matched at the interface between the URANS and the LES re-
energy)
filtered are
thematched
methodsequations are at
interface the interface
solved
between in URANS
the LES between
region,
and thewhereas
LES isURANS anddefined.
URANS
explicitly theequations
LESLES re-
gions. Among the most important contributions to the development of flow
gions.
are Among
solved in the
the most
URANS important
domain. contributions
The flow to the
parameters
filtered equations are solved in the LES region, whereas URANS equations development
(velocities, of flow
kinetic
matching methods we mention the works of (Davidson, Dalstroem [18]; Ter-
matching
energy)
are solved methods
areinmatched
the URANSweatmention
thedomain.the works
interface The of (Davidson,
between
flow the URANS
parameters Dalstroem
and the[18];
(velocities, LES Ter-
re-
kinetic
racol [19]; Jakirlic et. al. [20]; Temmerman et. al. [21]) and others. A
racol
gions. [19];
Among Jakirlic
the et.
most al. [20];
important Temmerman
contributions
energy) are matched at the interface between the URANS and the LES re-et.to al.
the [21]) and
development others.
of flow A
serious weakness of this approach is the development of robust procedures to
serious
matching weakness
gions. Among methodstheofmost
thismention
we approach
important theisworks
the development
of (Davidson,
contributions to theof robust
Dalstroem procedures
development [18];
of Ter-
flowto
set the URANS-LES interface for complicated flow geometries. Within the
set
racol the[19];
matching URANS-LES
Jakirlic we
methods et.interface
al. [20];
mention for complicated
theTemmerman flowal.
et.
works of (Davidson, geometries.
[21]) and Within
Dalstroem others. the
[18]; Ter- A
framework of the turbulence matching method an universal transport equa-
framework
serious of
weakness the turbulence
of this matching
approach is the method
developmentan
racol [19]; Jakirlic et. al. [20]; Temmerman et. al. [21]) and others. A universal
of robust transport
procedures equa-to
tion is solved in the whole computational domain. The stress terms in this
tion
set
seriousis solved
the in the
URANS-LES
weakness whole
of this computational
interface
approach foriscomplicateddomain.
the development flow The stress procedures
geometries.
of robust terms
Within in this
the
to
equation are treated in different ways in LES and URANS domains. There
equation
framework are treated in
of the turbulence
set the URANS-LES different
interfacematchingways in LES and
method flow
for complicated URANS
an universal
geometries.domains.
transport
Within There
equa-
the
are various procedures to distinguish between LES and URANS cells. The
are
tion various
is solved
framework procedures
of in the
the wholeto distinguish
turbulence matchingbetween
computational domain.
method LES and stress
The
an universal URANS cells.inequa-
terms
transport The
this
most popular hybrid method is Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) proposed
most ispopular
equation
tion(Spalart hybrid
are treated
solved method
in is Detached
different ways in LES Eddyand Simulation
URANS (DES)
domains. proposed
There
by et in the whole
al.[22]). Thecomputational
original versiondomain. The stress
of this method terms
is based in
on this
the
are various
equation are procedures
treated in to distinguish
different ways between
in LES LES
and and
URANS URANS
domains.cells. The
There
classic Smagorinsky LES model and 163 the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) URANS ap-
most popular hybrid method is Detached
163 Eddy Simulation (DES)cells.
proposed
proach. SA is used close to the wall, between
are various procedures to distinguish whereas LES LES andin theURANS
rest part of The the
most popular
flow. hybrid method
The switching between isthe Detached Eddy Simulation
two techniques is smooth(DES) proposed
and occurs in
163
a ”gray” subdomain. There are two major improvements of DES, devel-
oped recently. The first one, DDES163 (Delayed DES), has been proposed to
detect the boundary layers and to prolong the RANS mode, even if the wall-
parallel grid spacing would normally activate the DES limiter (Spalart [23]).
The second one, IDDES (Improved DDES), allows one to solve the prob-
lems with modelled-stress depletion and log-layer mismatch. For the details
see the review (Spalart [23]). In spite of a wide application area DES has
serious principle limitations thoroughly analyzed by (Menter, Egorov [24]).
Other versions of the turbulence matching methods using different blend-
ing functions to switch the solution between LES and URANS modes were
proposed by (Peng [17]; Davidson, Billson [25]; Abe, Miyata [26]) and others.
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
160
A very critical point of the turbulence matching methods is the transition
from the time (or ensemble) averaged smooth URANS flow to the oscillat-
ing LES flow, see (Menter, Egorov, 2005). The oscillations have to appear
within a short flow domain in a ”gray zone” between LES and URANS. Ex-
see the principle
serious review (Spalart [23]).thoroughly
limitations In spite ofanalyzed
a wide application
by (Menter,area DES[24]).
Egorov has
serious versions
Other principleoflimitations thoroughly
the turbulence analyzed
matching by (Menter,
methods Egorovblend-
using different [24]).
Other
ing versionstoofswitch
functions the turbulence
the solutionmatching
betweenmethods
LES andusing
URANSdifferent
modesblend-
were
ing functions
proposed to switch
by (Peng [17]; the solution
Davidson, between
Billson [25];LES
Abe,and URANS
Miyata [26])modes were
and others.
Lectures
proposedon computational fluid
by (Peng [17]; dynamics Billson [25]; Abe, Miyata [26])Hybrid
Davidson, URANS-LES methods
and others.
A very critical point of the turbulence matching methods is the transition
A very
from thecritical
time (orpoint of the turbulence
ensemble) matching
averaged smooth methods
URANS flowistothe
thetransition
oscillat-
fromLES
ing the flow,
time see
(or (Menter,
ensemble)Egorov,
averaged smooth
2005). TheURANS flow have
oscillations to thetooscillat-
appear
ing LESa short
within flow, see
flow(Menter,
domain in Egorov,
a ”gray2005).
zone” The oscillations
between LES and have to appear
URANS. Ex-
within a short
perience showsflow thatdomain in a ”gray
it is extremely zone” between
difficult to provideLES and URANS.
a smooth Ex-
transition
perience
of shows that
the turbulent it isenergy
kinetic extremely difficult
passing from theto provide
URANSatosmooth transition
LES domain. To
of the turbulent
overcome kinetic (Schlueter
this problem energy passing
et al.from
[27])the
andURANS
(Benerafato LES
et al.domain. To
[28]) used
overcome
an this forcing
additional problemterm (Schlueter et al. [27])
in the Navier Stokesandequation
(Benerafa et al. [28])
artificially used
enhanc-
an additional
ing fluctuationsforcing
in theterm
grayinzone.
the Navier
However, Stokes
the equation
problem of artificially enhanc-
smooth solution
ing fluctuations
transition in the gray
from URANS zone.still
to LES However,
remainsthe asproblem
the mainofchallenge
smooth solution
for the
transition from
turbulence URANS
matching to LES still remains as the main challenge for the
methods.
turbulence matching methods.
2
@Q @Q Q
C vNj D Cb1 SQ Q Cw1 fw C
@t @xj „ ƒ‚ … d
Generation „ ƒ‚ …
Destruction
(16.1)
1 @ @Q Cb2 @Q @Q
C . C /
Q C
@x @xk @xk @xk
„ k ƒ‚ …
Diffusion
where
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
where
3
f1 D 3
; f2 D 1 ;
C C1
3 1 C f1
6 1=6
1 C Cw3
fw D g 6 6
; D =;
Q
g C Cw3
Q
g D r C Cw2 .r 6 r/; r D ;
Q 2d 2
S
Q p
SQ D S C 2 2 f2 ; S D 2˝ij ˝ij ;
d
1 @N i @Nj
˝ij D
2 @xj @xi
165
Here d is the distance from the wall. The physical sense of different terms
is illustrated in (16.1). Far from the wall the generation and the distruction
terms are approaching each to other and the turbulence attains the equilib-
rium state:
2
Q
Cb1 SQ Q Cw1 fw 0
„ ƒ‚ … d
Generation „ ƒ‚ …
Destruction
Cb1 Q 2
Q Sd
Cw1
which is similar to the Smagorinsky one:
q
t D lS2 jSQij j; jSQij j D 2SQij SQij
lS D CS
where CDE S 1:3 is the DES constant. Now the main idea of the DES
becomes obvious:
At small wall distance d < CDE S the Spalart Almaras URANS model is
active
At large wall distance d > CDE S the Spalart Almaras URANS model is
smoothly passed into the Smagorinsky model.
Samples of DES applications are presented in Fig. 16.2 and 16.3.
Despite of the wide application Detached Eddy Simulation technique is not
free of disadvantages. Menter [24] notes: The essential concern with DES
is that it does not continuously change from RANS to LES under grid re-
finement. In order for LES structures to appear, the grid spacing and time
step have to be refined beyond a case-dependent critical limit. In addition, a
sufficiently large instability mechanism has to be present to allow the rapid
formation of turbulent structures in regions where the DES limiter is acti-
vated. If one of the two, or both requirements are violated, the resulting
model is undefined and the outcome is largely unpredictable.
166
163
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Hybrid URANS-LES methods
Figure 16.2: Flow around combat aircraft. (Squires K.D., Detached-eddy simulation:
Figure 16.2: Squires K.D., Detached-eddy simulation: current status and
current status and perspectives)
perspectives.
Figure
Figure16.3:
16.3:Flow around
Squires combat
K.D., aircraft. (Squires
Detached-eddy K.D., Detached-eddy
simulation: simulation:
current status and
current status and perspectives)
perspectives.
167
164
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Hybrid URANS-LES methods
Figure 16.4: The division of the computational domain into the URANS
(dark) and LES (light) regions at one time instant for hybrid calculation of
tanker.
laminar and turbulent stresses respectively. Note that the turbulent stresses
are calculated in different ways in LES and URANS regions.
The computational domain in our model is dynamically (i.e. at each time
step) divided into the LES and URANS regions. A cell of the mesh belongs
to one or the other region depending on the relation between the integral
length scale L and the extended LES filter according to the following rule:
The integral length scale is calculated from the known formula of Kolmogorov
and Prandtl with the correction factor 0:168 taken from [12]
k 3=2
Brain power LDC
"
; By 2020, wind could provide(16.4)
one-tenth of our planet’s
electricity needs. Already today, SKF’s innovative know-
how is crucial to running a large proportion of the
where k is the turbulent kinetic energy and " is theworld’s
dissipation
wind turbines.rate. The
constant C is C 0:168 close to the wall y=ı < 0:2, C to 25 %at
Up 0:35 0:2generating
of the < y=ıcosts < relate to mainte-
nance. These can be reduced dramatically thanks to our
0:7 and C 1:0 in the outer area of the bounder layer y=ıfor>on-line
systems wheremonitoring
0:7,condition ı is and automatic
the boundary layer thickness. L varies from one timelubrication.
step toWeanother,
help make it which
more economical to create
cleaner, cheaper energy out of thin air.
results in varying decomposition of the computational domain into the LES
By sharing our experience, expertise, and creativity,
and URANS regions. The extended LES filter is computed asboost performance beyond expectations.
industries can
q
Therefore we need the best employees who can
meet this challenge!
D dmax 2 C ı2; (16.5)
The Power of Knowledge Engineering
where dmax is the maximal length of the cell edges dmax D max.dx ; dy ; dz /
and ı D .the cell volume/1=3 is the common filter width used in LES. This
choice ensures that very flat cells in the boundary layer (for which ı 0
but dmax > 0) are treated correctly. depends only on the mesh and it is
168
Plug into The Power of Knowledge Engineering.
Visit us at www.skf.com/knowledge
The integral length scale is calculated from the known formula of Kolmogorov
and Prandtl with the correction factor 0:168 taken from [12]
k 3=2
LDC ; (16.4)
"
where k is the turbulent kinetic energy and " is the dissipation rate. The
constant C is C 0:168 close to the wall y=ı < 0:2, C 0:35 at 0:2 < y=ı <
0:7 and C 1:0 in the outer area of the bounder layer y=ı > 0:7, where ı is
the boundary layer thickness. L varies from one time step to another, which
results in varying decomposition of the computational domain into the LES
and URANS regions. The extended LES filter is computed as
q
D dmax 2 C ı2; (16.5)
where dmax is the maximal length of the cell edges dmax D max.dx ; dy ; dz /
and ı D .the cell volume/1=3 is the common filter width used in LES. This
choice ensures that very flat cells in the boundary layer (for which ı 0
but dmax > 0) are treated correctly. depends only on the mesh and it is
precomputed only once before the main computation.
168
As a sample LES and URANS regions are shown in Fig. 16.4 for flow around
a tanker. The URANS region is located close to the ship surface and plays
the role of a dynamic wall function. In areas of bilge vortices formation, the
boundary layer is shedding from the hull and penetrates into the outer flow
part. Since the boundary layer is a fine scale flow the procedure (16.3) recog-
nizes the bilge vortex formation zones as URANS ones. There is a technical
issue concerning the cells which are far from the ship hull and where both
k and " are small, so large numerical errors are introduced into the integral
length scale computed according to Eq. (16.4). To avoid an irregular dis-
tribution of URANS and LES zones, the general rule (16.3) of the domain
decomposition is corrected in such a way that the LES region is switched to
URANS one if k is getting less than some threshold. This procedure has no
influence on the ship flow parameters since it is used far from the area of the
primary interest.
The maximum possible cell size is then max D 2=k . The scales L and
are found from the known expression D . 3 ="/1=4 and Eq. (16.4), where
the kinetic energy k and the dissipation rate " are taken from RANS simula-
tions using k-" linear model. The ratio D max = is then used as the scale
parameter for grid generation. Both lengths vary in space which makes the
grid generation procedure very complicated. To roughly estimate the size of
the grid we assume that is constant. We performed different calculations
determining at the two following points: i) the point where L= is maximal
in the ship boundary layer and ii) the point in the propeller disk where the
vorticity !E is maximal (region of the concentrated vortex structure). The lat-
ter is dictated by the wish to resolve the most intensive vortex flow structures
which have the strongest influence on the propeller operation. Since LES ap-
plication is required in the ship stern area only this part of the computational
volume has been meshed. It covers the boundary layer of the stern region
starting from the end of the parallel midship section. The thickness of the
meshed region has been constant and equal to the maximum boundary layer
thickness at the stern ıBL . The grid for a pure LES is generated using the
following algorithm. The minimum Kolmogorov length min is determined
in the near wall region. The cell sizes in x and z directions along the wall
are calculated by multiplication of min with the scale parameter . These
sizes remain constant for all cells row in y direction which is normal to the
ship surface (see Fig. 16.5). The cells have at least two equal sizes which is
desirable from the point of view of LES accuracy. The choice of the size in y
direction is dictated by proper resolution of the boundary layer. Close to the
wall this size is chosen from the condition w D min.yw ; min /. Since yw is
chosen as the ordinate where y C D 1 the first nodes lay deeply in the viscous
sublayer. The size in y direction at the upper border of the boundary layer
is equal to 1 D ı , where ı is the Kolmogorov scale at y D ıBL . A
simple grading is used in y direction between w and 1 .
Results of the estimations are as follows: the required grid size ranges from
5 M to 25 M for Re D 2:8 106 , and from 7 M to 60 M for
Re D 5:8 106 . The results vary depending on the value of in use, so
they should be considered as very rough estimations. Together with simi-
lar estimations for the nonlinear k-" model these results show that the LES
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
171
168 Click on the ad to read more
wave number k separating the resolved and modeled turbulence is found
from the condition
R1
E.k/d k
Rk
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics 0:2: Hybrid (16.8)
URANS-LES methods
1
0 E.k/d k
The maximum possible cell size is then max D 2=k . The scales L and
are found from the known expression D . 3 ="/1=4 and Eq. (16.4), where
the kinetic energy k and the dissipation rate " are taken from RANS simula-
tions using k-" linear model. The ratio D max = is then used as the scale
parameter for grid generation. Both lengths vary in space which makes the
grid generation procedure very complicated. To roughly estimate the size of
the grid we assume that is constant. We performed different calculations
determining at the two following points: i) the point where L= is maximal
in the ship boundary layer and ii) the point in the propeller disk where the
vorticity !E is maximal (region of the concentrated vortex structure). The lat-
ter is dictated by the wish to resolve the most intensive vortex flow structures
which have the strongest influence on the propeller operation. Since LES ap-
plication is required in the ship stern area only this part of the computational
volume has been meshed. It covers the boundary layer of the stern region
starting from the end of the parallel midship section. The thickness of the
meshed region has been constant and equal to the maximum boundary layer
thickness at the stern ıBL . The grid for a pure LES is generated using the
following algorithm. The minimum Kolmogorov length min is determined
in the near wall region. The cell sizes in x and z directions along the wall
are calculated by multiplication of min with the scale parameter . These
sizes remain constant for all cells row in y direction which is normal to the
ship surface (see Fig. 16.5). The cells have at least two equal sizes which is
desirable from the point of view of LES accuracy. The choice of the size in y
direction is dictated by proper resolution of the boundary layer. Close to the
wall this size is chosen from the condition w D min.yw ; min /. Since yw is
chosen as the ordinate where y C D 1 the first nodes lay deeply in the viscous
sublayer. The size in y direction at the upper border of the boundary layer
is equal to 1 D ı , where ı is the Kolmogorov scale at y D ıBL . A
simple grading is used in y direction between w and 1 .
Results of the estimations are as follows: the required grid size ranges from
5 M to 25 M for Re D 2:8 106 , and from 7 M to 60 M for
Re D 5:8 106 . The results vary depending on the value of in use, so
they should be considered as very rough estimations. Together with simi-
lar estimations for the nonlinear k-" model these results show that the LES
171
169
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Hybrid URANS-LES methods
·min
··
min
·min
=1 min
+
y
··
=11 ·min
++
yy = min
··
z
x z y
z
y
y
x
x
Figure 16.5: The cell parameters.
Figure
Figure 16.5:
16.5: The
The cell
cell parameters.
parameters.
grid should have the order of tens of millions of nodes. Nowadays, the com-
putations with
grid hundred millions andmillions
even with nodes.
a few billions of nodes are
grid should
should have
have the
the order
order ofof tens
tens of
of millions of
of nodes. Nowadays,
Nowadays, the the com-
com-
becoming available
putations in the researchand community. However, a numerical study
putations with
with hundred
hundred millions
millions and even
even with
with aa few
few billions
billions of
of nodes
nodes areare
of engineering
becoming problems
available in implies
the usually
research many computations
community. However, a which havestudy
numerical to be
becoming available in the research community. However, a numerical study
performed within
of a reasonable time with moderate computational have resources.
of engineering
engineering problems
problems implies
implies usually
usually many
many computations
computations which which have to to be
be
In this
performedsense, the
within results
a of
reasonable the present
time withsubsection
moderate clearly demonstrate
computational that
resources.
performed within a reasonable time with moderate computational resources.
the puresense,
In LES is impossible for ship applications so far. To verify that the
In this
this sense, thethe results
results ofof the
the present
present subsection
subsection clearly
clearly demonstrate
demonstrate that that
resolution
the estimation procedure we used gives meaningful results, it has been
the pure LES is impossible for ship applications so far. To verify that the
pure LES is impossible for ship applications so far. To verify that the
applied forestimation
resolution turbulent boundary
procedure layer
we (TBL)
used benchmark.
gives meaningful We foundit from
results, has me-
been
resolution estimation procedure we used gives meaningful results, it has been
thodical calculations
applied that the pure LES with 1M cells isWe quite accurate for
applied for
for turbulent
turbulent boundary
boundary layer
layer (TBL)
(TBL) benchmark.
benchmark. We found found from
from me-me-
prediction of the velocity
thodical distribution, TBL thickness, TBL displacement
thodical calculations
calculations thatthat the
the pure
pure LES
LES with
with 1M1M cells
cells is
is quite
quite accurate
accurate for for
thickness
prediction and
of the
the wall
velocityshear stress.
distribution, The
TBLestimation
thickness, procedure
TBL presented
displacement
prediction of the velocity distribution, TBL thickness, TBL displacement
above predictedthe
thickness the necessary resolution around 0.5M. Therefore,presented
the esti-
thickness and
and the wall wall shear
shear stress.
stress. The
The estimation
estimation procedure
procedure presented
mations presented
above for a ship model are rather lower bound for the resolution
above predicted
predicted the the necessary
necessary resolution
resolution around
around 0.5M.
0.5M. Therefore,
Therefore, the the esti-
esti-
required
mations for a pure
presented LES.
for a ship model are rather lower bound for the resolution
mations presented for a ship model are rather lower bound for the resolution
required
required for
for aa pure
pure LES.
LES.
CR CP CF
3
KRISO Exp. 4:11 10 15% 85%
2 3
RANS k"v f 4:00 10 16% 84%
k-! SST SAS 3:80 103 18% 82%
Underresolved LES 1:70 103 81% 19%
Hybrid RANS LES 4:07 103 17% 83%
Table 16.1: Results of the resistance prediction using different methods. CR is
the resistance coefficient, CP is the pressure resistance and CF is the friction
resistance
172
172
172
170
Part III
171
175
Mathematical model of the ice protection
of a human body at high temperatures
Chapter 17
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics of surrounding medium
Chapter 17
Chapter 17
Mathematical model of the ice
Mathematical
protection of amodel
humanof the ice
Mathematical model ofbody at
the ice
protection
high of a human
temperatures of body at
protection of a human body at
high temperatures
surrounding mediumof
high temperatures of
surrounding medium
surrounding medium
17.1 Designations
17.1 Designations
17.1.1 List of symbols
17.1 Designations
A area (m2 )
17.1.1 List of symbols
c specific
17.1.1 List
p heatofcapacity
symbols (J/(kgK))
2
F area
A (m of) heat release(W=m3 )
density
2
hp area
cA sector(mheight
specific ) capacity
heat (m) (J/(kgK))
cF specific heat capacity 3
(J/(kgK))
Kp density of
correlation heat release(W=m
factor of the rectal) temperature
3
F
h
k density
sector
the of heat release(W=m
heightconductivity
thermal (m) )
(W/(mK))
h
K
M sectordone
work height
correlation by (m)
factor of the
person (W)rectal temperature
k
m correlation
K body
the thermal factor of the rectal
conductivity
mass (kg) temperature
(W/(mK))
k
M the
work thermal
done
P body height (cm)byconductivity
person (W) (W/(mK))
m
Q work done
M internal
body mass by
(kg)
energy person
(J) (W)
QmP body
P heat flux mass
height (kg)
(W)(cm)
R sector radius(cm)
P
Q body
internalheight
energy (m)(J)
P internal
heat fluxenergy
Q temperature
T (W)(deg)(J)
Q P heat flux (W)
sector coordinate
R radial
x radius (m) along the sector (m)
R
T
˛ sector
centralradius
temperature (m)
sector(deg)
angle (deg)
T
x
temperature
radial
skin thickness (deg)
coordinate(m)along the sector (m)
x
˛
radial
thermal coordinate
central sector
diffusivity along
angle 2 the sector (m)
(deg)
(m =s)
˛
central
skin sector (kg=m
massthickness
density angle
(m) (deg)
3
)
skin
initialthickness
thermal (m) (m
diffusivity
temperature 2
(deg) =s)
thermal
mass density (kg=m(m)2 =s)
diffusivity 3
178
3
mass
initial density (kg=m
temperature
17.1.2 Subscripts )
(deg)
initial temperature (deg) 178
core human body core 178
hum human body
i number of human body layer
j number of point on the human body
med surrounding medium
melt melting ice
outer outer boundary of clothes
skin human body skin
17.1.3 Superscripts
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
0 degree of Celsius
172
17.2 Introduction
j number of point on the human body
med surrounding medium
melt melting ice Mathematical model of the ice protection
outer outer boundary of clothes of a human body at high temperatures
Lectures
skin onhuman
computational
bodyfluid
skindynamics of surrounding medium
17.1.3 Superscripts
0 degree of Celsius
17.2 Introduction
The heat transfer inside the human body is an extremely complicated prob-
lem which is difficult to formulate properly. The body generates the heat
within certain organs which is then transferred by the thermal diffusion
through the body substance possessing very non uniform properties. How-
ever, the thermal diffusion being complicated is not the main difficulty of
modeling. A large fraction of the heat generated by internal organs is trans-
ported to the body periphery by a complicated net of blood vessels. This
process has still not been modeled with a desirable accuracy. While a full
detailed model of the human thermodynamics is still remaining the problem
of the future, the practical design of protection clothes demands the reliable
models already now. Such models are necessary to reduce the time and costs
consuming measurements and to avoid dangerous experiments with people
under emergency conditions. The models can be only of a semi empiric char-
acter and must relay on measurements data to diminish the modelling errors.
179
technologically easy and renewable can be used for protection clothes of res-
cue teams working under high temperatures up to 500 and more.
180
radii of each sector R can be found from the table 17.2. The upper elliptical
cylinder is from the neck to the waist, whereas the lower one from the waist
to the thing (Fig. 17.1). The skin thickness is approximately calculated as
the radius R divided by 60:25 [33]. The sizes of different layers inside of the
cross section are presented in the table 17.3. At the high temperatures the
main part of the heat production occurs in certain organs. The knowledge
about the heat distribution inside the body allows one to choose the most
efficient design of the ice protection which typical construction is shown in
Fig. 17.3. In the mathematical model the ice and the clothes layer are mod-
elled by additional layers covering the human body (Fig. 17.2). The human
body model was developed on the base of data taken from [36], [37], [38]
and [39].
@T @T @ @T
dQ1 D k.x C dx/S.x C dx/ k.x/S.x/ dt k.x/S.x/ dt
@x @x @x @x
(17.1)
where T .x; t/ is the temperature, k is the thermal conductivity, S.x/ D ˛xh
is the sector arc length multiplied with its height h and ˛ is the central angle
181
175
Mathematical model of the ice protection
of a human body at high temperatures
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics of surrounding medium
182
176
Mathematical model of the ice protection
of a human body at high temperatures
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics of surrounding medium
Table 17.3: Radii of layers used in simulations in fraction of the skin thickness
EXPERIENCE
of the sector. Within the THE POWER
material OFadditionally the heat release with
we have
the heatFULL
densityENGAGEMENT…
F (heat per unit volume):
of the sector. Within the material we have additionally the heat release with
the heat density F (heat per unit volume):
@T
dQ3 D cp S dxdt (17.3)
@t
where cp is the specific heat capacity and is the mass density of the material.
By conservation of energy
or
@T @ @T
S.x/ D S.x/ C S.x/f .x/ (17.4)
@t @x @x
where .x/ D k=.cp / is the thermal diffusivity and f .x/ D F .x/=.cp /.
The equation (17.4) is solved at the initial condition
The heat transfer process is subdivided into three steps. Within the first
step the ice is warmed up to the melting temperature. The melting process
is followed by the absorption of the heat coming from both the surrounding
medium Qmed
@T
QP med D med Amed (17.8)
@x
and the human body Qhum caused by metabolism
@T
QP hum D ski n Aski n (17.9)
@x
where med is the thermal diffusivity184of the clothing layer adjacent to the
ice layer, Amed is the surface between the ice layer and adjacent clothing
layer in a sector under consideration, ski n is the thermal diffusivity of the
human skin and Aski n is the skin surface in the sector. The second step is the
ice layer melting. The phase transition in matter is described by the Stefan
problem [40]. In this paper we used a simplified approach based on the heat
balance conditions. It is assumed that the water and ice mixture is uniform
with the constant temperature of zero degree of Celsius. The dynamics of
the boundary between the water and ice is not considered. The heat fluxes
(17.8) and (17.9) are constant in time. The second step is finished in time t
once the ice is melted:
The equation (17.4) is solved using the finite differential method on the
uniform grid x D const with the constant time step t D const. The
numerical implementation utilizes the central differential scheme for space
derivatives and Crank Nicolson implicit representation of the unsteady term.
An inhouse code was developed for this purposes.
17.5 Results
17.5.1 Design of the protection clothes
The calculations were performed for five elements of the human body shown
in Fig.17.1. Thermodynamic properties of the body layers are given in the
table 17.4. Usually, the ice protection construction consists of the ice layer
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
separated from the surrounding medium by several layers. In the present
179 with thickness of 0:001m, iso-
work we used three layers: outer clothing layer
lating layer of 0:009m and the air layer of 0:003m. All layers have the initial
temperature Ti0 D 190 . The air gap between the ice and the underwear of
the thickness 0:0025 m was 0:003 m thick. The human body was 180 cm in
uniform grid x D const with the constant time step t D const. The
numerical implementation utilizes the central differential scheme for space
Mathematical model of the ice protection
derivatives and Crank Nicolson implicit representation of of athe unsteady
human body atterm.
high temperatures
An inhouse code was developed for
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics this purposes. of surrounding medium
17.5 Results
17.5.1 Design of the protection clothes
The calculations were performed for five elements of the human body shown
in Fig.17.1. Thermodynamic properties of the body layers are given in the
table 17.4. Usually, the ice protection construction consists of the ice layer
separated from the surrounding medium by several layers. In the present
work we used three layers: outer clothing layer with thickness of 0:001m, iso-
lating layer of 0:009m and the air layer of 0:003m. All layers have the initial
temperature Ti0 D 190 . The air gap between the ice and the underwear of
the thickness 0:0025 m was 0:003 m thick. The human body was 180 cm in
height with the mass of 80 kg. The full description of the input data can be
found in [41]. It was assumed that the test person does the work at a rate of
about M D 420 watts. Additional heat release due to this work was taken
into account during numerical simulations in the heat production rate f .x/
(see Eq. (17.4)).
185
The numerical simulations are used to find the distribution of the ice thick-
ness necessary to keep the body core (both inner an outer) temperature at less
than 36:70 ˙10 within one hour at the temperature of surrounding medium of
500 . The numerical results were utilized to design a special protection jacket
for rescue team working under emergency conditions in the mining industry.
Since the continuous distribution of the ice protection is difficult from the
technology point of view and undesirable from ergonomics considerations the
jacket protection was designed using the discrete distribution of the ice in
form of briquettes embedded into the jacket (see Fig. 17.4). The further
simulations have been performed to prove the ability of the new designed
jacket to satisfy the protection requirements. Fig. 17.5 illustrates the tem-
perature distribution around the human body in centers of the upper and the
lower elliptical cylinders shown in Fig. 17.1. The discrepancy between the
desirable temperature 36:70 corresponding to the continuous ice distribution
and the actual temperature corresponding to the discrete ice distribution can
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
be considered as acceptable. Therefore the jacket designed on the base of
numerical simulations was manufactured and 180 tested in further Click
experimental
on the ad to read more
investigations.
The numerical simulations are used to find the distribution of the ice thick-
ness necessary to keep the body core (both inner an outer) temperature at less
than 36:70 ˙10 within one hour at the temperature of surrounding medium of
500 . The numerical results were utilized to design a special protection jacket
for rescue team working under emergency conditions in the mining industry.
Since the continuous distribution of the ice protection is difficult from the
technology point of view and undesirable from ergonomics considerations the
jacket protection was designed using the discrete distribution of the ice in
form of briquettes embedded into the jacket (see Fig. 17.4). The further
simulations have been performed to prove the ability of the new designed
jacket to satisfy the protection requirements. Fig. 17.5 illustrates the tem-
perature distribution around the human body in centers of the upper and the
lower elliptical cylinders shown in Fig. 17.1. The discrepancy between the
desirable temperature 36:70 corresponding to the continuous ice distribution
and the actual temperature corresponding to the discrete ice distribution can
be considered as acceptable. Therefore the jacket designed on the base of
numerical simulations was manufactured and tested in further experimental
investigations.
186
181
Mathematical model of the ice protection
of a human body at high temperatures
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics of surrounding medium
Figure 17.5: Temperature distributions around the body with continuous ice
distribution and with ice briquettes. Results of numerical simulations after
60 minutes.
187
182
Mathematical model of the ice protection
of a human body at high temperatures
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics of surrounding medium
Figure 17.6: Development of the averaged temperature in the air gap between
the underwear and the ice protection on the human chest. Comparison be-
tween the measurement (solid line) and the numerical simulations (dotted
Figure 17.6: Development of the averaged temperature in the air gap between
line).
the underwear and the ice protection on the human chest. Comparison be-
tween the measurement (solid line) and the numerical simulations (dotted
line).
cm in height and normal weight m. The body surface A can be calculated
from the empirical formula A D 0:24m0:425 P 0:4 [41]. The candidates weared
the jackets (see Fig. 17.4)were doing the work at a rate of about M D 420
cm in height and normal weight m. The body surface A can be calculated
watts which corresponds to a hard work typical for the mining industry. The
www.sylvania.com
from the empirical formula A D 0:24m0:425 P 0:4 [41]. 0The candidates weared
temperature of the surrounding medium was T 50 . The temperature has
the jackets (see Fig. 17.4)were doing the work at a rate of about M D 420
been measured in the air gap between the underwear and the ice at seven
watts which corresponds to a hard work typical for the mining industry. The
points around the chest (section 2 in Fig. 17.1). The0 temperature averaged
over these points is presented in Fig. 17.6. The We dotemperature
not reinvent
temperature of the surrounding medium was T 50 . The has
discrepancy between the
been measured in the air gap between the underwear and the ice at seven
thetemperature
wheel we
measurement and the numerical simulations does not exceed 14 percent af-
points around the chest (section 2 in Fig. 17.1). The
ter 60 minutes of the real time. This agreement can be considered as quite
reinvent
averaged
satisfactory taking the simplicity of the used model light.
over these points is presented in Fig. 17.6. The discrepancy between the
and complexity of the
measurement and the numerical simulations does not exceed 14 percent af-
problem into account.
ter 60 minutes of the real time. This agreement can be considered
Fascinating lighting offersas
anquite
infinite spectrum of
possibilities: Innovative technologies and new
satisfactory taking the simplicity of the used model and complexity of the
markets provide both opportunities and challenges.
problem into account. An environment in which your expertise is in high
188
demand. Enjoy the supportive working atmosphere
within our global group and benefit from international
career paths. Implement sustainable ideas in close
188 cooperation with other specialists and contribute to
influencing our future. Come and join us in reinventing
light every day.
Light is OSRAM
188
Figure 17.7: Test person weared overheating protection jacket (left) and
distribution of the temperature sensors on the human body (right).
The task of this study is the determination of the temperature in the body
core. It is a difficult problem since the direct measurement is impossible.
The experience gathered in physiology [42] shows that the core temperature
can reliably be determined if the temperature Tj at five characteristic points
(forehead, chest, hand, thigh and shin) is known (see Fig.17.7). The sensors
were mounted directly on the human skin with the rate of press not exceeding
0:2 0:25 Pa. The accuracy of measurements is estimated as 0:10 C . These
temperatures are summed up with weighting coefficients wj . Each tempera-
ture is nearly constant within a certain area Aj . The weighting coefficients
are calculated as the ratio of Aj to the total body surface A, i.e. wj D Aj =S.
The averaged temperature is calculated then from the formula [41]
The second series of measurements was carried out directly during the work
The second series of measurements was carried out directly during the work
in a cole mine at the temperature not higher than 6000 without fire action.
The
in a second series
cole mine at of
themeasurements was higher
temperature not carriedthan
out directly during
60 without firetheaction.
work
During one year of observations no equipment fault has 0 been documented.
in a cole mine at the temperature not higher than 60 without
During one year of observations no equipment fault has been documented.fire action.
The temperature of workers was kept at a prescribed level during at least
During
The one year ofof observations
temperature workers was no equipment
kept fault has
at a prescribed been
level documented.
during at least
55 60 minutes as predicted both in numerical simulations and thermal
The temperature
55 60 minutes asof workers
predictedwas keptin atnumerical
both a prescribed level during
simulations at least
and thermal
chamber tests.
55 60 minutes
chamber tests. as predicted both in numerical simulations and thermal
chamber tests.
17.6
17.6 Discussion
Discussion
17.6 Discussion
This chapter presents relatively simple and efficient model of the heat trans-
This chapter presents relatively simple and efficient model of the heat trans-
fer within the human body at high temperatures of the surrounding medium.
This chapter
fer within thepresents
human bodyrelatively simple
at high and efficient
temperatures model
of the of the heat
surrounding trans-
medium.
The human body cross section is represented as an ellipse with a few lay-
fer within
The human thebody
human body
cross at high
section is temperatures
represented asofan theellipse
surrounding
with a medium.
few lay-
ers, modelling the internal organs. The heat generation by internal organs
The
ers, modelling the internal organs. The heat generation by internalfew
human body cross section is represented as an ellipse with a lay-
organs
is taken into account. The ice protection and the clothes are modelled as
ers,taken
is modelling the internal
into account. Theorgans. The heat
ice protection andgeneration
the clothes byare
internal organs
modelled as
additional layers covering the human body. Neglecting the heat transfer in
is taken into
additional account.
layers covering Thetheicehuman
protection
body.and the clothes
Neglecting the are
heatmodelled
transfer asin
vertical and circumferential directions the problem is reduced to the solution
additional layers covering the human body. Neglecting the heat
vertical and circumferential directions the problem is reduced to the solution transfer in
of the one dimensional heat conduction equation with variable heat diffu-
vertical
of the oneanddimensional
circumferential
heatdirections
conductionthe equation
problem is reduced
with to the
variable heatsolution
diffu-
sivity. The simulations were performed using the finite differential method.
of the one
sivity. The dimensional heat performed
simulations were conductionusing
equation with differential
the finite variable heat diffu-
method.
Results of simulation were used for calculation of the ice layer thickness nec-
sivity. The simulations were performed using the finite differential
Results of simulation were used for calculation of the ice layer thickness nec- method.
essary to prevent the body overheating and to keep the temperature of the
Results
essary
Downloadtooffree
simulation
prevent
eBooksthe
were
bodyused for calculation
overheating
at bookboon.com and toofkeep
the the
ice layer thicknessofnec-
temperature the
essary to prevent the body overheating and to keep the temperature of the
190 185
190
190
Mathematical model of the ice protection
of a human body at high temperatures
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics of surrounding medium
360°
thinking . 360°
thinking
191
.
191
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers Dis
Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers © Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Chapter 18
Chapter 18
CFD Design of cloth for
CFD Design
protection of of clothatfor
divers low
CFD Design of cloth for
protection of divers
temperatures under at low
current
protection of divers at low
temperatures
conditions under current
temperatures under current
conditions
conditions
Study was performed for the model Tin Man presented in Fig. 18.1. Inner
thermodynamics in the body was not modelled. The temperature of the hu-
Study
man body was was
performed
assumed fortothe
be model
constantTinand Man presented
equal to 330 at in the
Fig.temperature
18.1. Inner
Study was
thermodynamics performed
in thefor the
body of model
was10not Tin Man
modelled. presented in
The temperatureFig. 18.1.theInner
of the surrounding medium degrees of Celsius. 0
Thus, theofDirichlet hu-
thermodynamics
man body was in the body
assumed to be was not modelled.
constant and equal The
to temperature
33 at the of the hu-
temperature
boundary conditions were enforced for the temperature whereas the heat
man body
of was assumed to beofconstant and of equal to 330 Thus,
at the thetemperature
fluxthe
fromsurrounding
the body medium
was calculated.10 degrees
Heat exchange Celsius.
by shivering, Dirichlet
breathing
of the
boundary surrounding
conditions medium of
were enforced10 degrees of
forexchange Celsius.
the temperature Thus, the
whereas Dirichlet
and radiation was neglected. The heat between the body the
and heat
sur-
boundary
flux from conditions
the body were
was enforced for
calculated. Heat the temperature
exchange by whereas breathing
shivering, the heat
rounding medium is mostly determined by the convection due to wind. The
flux radiation
and from the bodyneglected.
was calculated. Heat exchange by shivering,
the bodybreathing
incompressiblewas flow was calculatedThe heat
using exchange between
steady RANS (Reynolds and sur-
Averaged
and radiation
rounding mediumwas neglected.
is mostly usingThe heat
determined exchange
by!the between
convection the body and The
sur-
Navier- Stokes Equations) the k SST model. due to wind.
Temperature was
rounding medium
incompressible is was
mostly determined
usingbysteady
the convection due to wind. The
considered as aflow passive calculated
scalar determined from RANS (Reynolds
the temperature Averaged
transport
incompressible
Navier- flow was calculated using
k steady
SSTRANS (Reynolds Averaged
equation.Stokes Equations)
The framework using the
OpenFOAM was! utilizedmodel.
for the Temperature
numerical solu- was
Navier- Stokes
considered as a Equations)
passive using
scalar the k !from
determined SSTthemodel. Temperature
temperature was
transport
tion of this problem.
considered The
equation. as a passive scalar determined wasfrom the for
temperature transport
First, CFD was framework
validated for OpenFOAM
the case of the utilized
air the numerical
flow. Distribution of the solu-
heat
equation.
tion of thisThe framework
problem. OpenFOAM was utilized for the numerical solu-
transfer coefficient along the Tin Man body is shown in Fig. 18.1, left. The
tion ofCFD
First, this was
problem.
validated for the caseseparation
of the air flow. Distribution
minimal heat flux takes place in the area with reduced of flowtheveloc-
heat
First,
transferCFD was validated for the case of the air flow. Distribution 18.1, left. heat
of the
ities, i.e.coefficient
behind the along
bodythe Tinand
arms Manhead,
bodyasiswellshown in the
as in Fig.stagnation The
area
transfer coefficient
minimal heat flux alongplace
takes the Tin
in Man
the body is area
separation shown in Fig.
with 18.1,flow
reduced left.veloc-
The
in the front part of the body. Figure 18.1 illustrates the integral coefficient
minimal
ities, heat fluxthe
takes place in the separation areaaswith reduced flow veloc-
of thei.e. behind
heat transfer body arms
hc obtained and
by head, as well
integration overinthethe stagnation
whole body area
sur-
ities,
in thei.e. behind
front part the
of body
the arms
body. and
Figure head,
18.1 as well as
illustrates in
the the stagnation
integral area
coefficient
face. Results of authors marked by crosses are compared with experimental
in the front
of part of the body. Figure 18.1 illustratesoverthe
theintegral coefficient
data ofheat transfer
de Dear obtained
et al.hc(triangles) by integration
and different calculations. whole body
Shadowed sur-
grey
of theResults
face. heat transfer obtainedbybycrosses
hc marked
of scattering
authors integration over thewith whole body sur-
area shows the of data otbainedare compared
using experimental
various approaches. Big
face. Results of authors marked by crosses are compared
data of de Dear et al. (triangles) and different calculations. Shadowed grey with experimental
data shows
area of de Dear et al. (triangles)
the scattering of dataand different
otbained calculations.
using Shadowed grey
various approaches. Big
193
area shows the scattering of data otbained using various approaches. Big
193
193
Figure 18.1: Left: Heat transfer coefficient at air speed of 1m=s. Right:
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
Whole body convective heat transfer coefficient hc from various published
187 show results of the present
works. The figure is taken from [2]. Blue crosses
work.
Figure 18.1: Left: Heat transfer coefficient at air speed of 1m=s. Right:
Whole body convective heat transfer coefficient hcc from various published
works. The figure is taken from [2]. Blue crosses show results of the present
work.
188
2:5 5:27 106 4:46
4:5 7:74 106 6:33
6:5 1:01 105 8:08Design of cloth for protection of divers at
CFD
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics low temperatures under current conditions
Table 18.1: Heat flux from the diver depending on the
cloth contamination
195
Do you like cars? Would you like to be a part of a successful brand? Send us your CV on
We will appreciate and reward both your enthusiasm and talent. www.employerforlife.com
Send us your CV. You will be surprised where it can take you.
Figure 19.1: Human body model in wind tunnel of the Rostock university
(left). Positions of measurement points (right).
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
downsizing the real body with the scale factor
190 of 0:39. Within the open test
section the size of the air jet with uniform velocity distribution is estimated
as one meter at least. Since it is one and half times as large as the model
height, the influence of the jet boundaries on flow around the body can be
CFD application for design of cloth for
Figure 19.1: Human body model in wind tunnelprotection of the Rostock university under wind
from low temperatures
Lectures
(left). on computational
Positions fluid dynamicspoints (right). conditions. Infl uence of the wind on the cloth
of measurement
deformation and heat transfer from the body.
downsizing the real body with the scale factor of 0:39. Within the open test
section the size of the air jet with uniform velocity distribution is estimated
as one meter at least. Since it is one and half times as large as the model
height, the influence of the jet boundaries on flow around the body can be
considered as negligible. Two measurement series were performed. In the
first one the pressure was measured at nine points distributed at three cross
sections z D 0:329; 0:418 and 0:476 (see Fig. 19.1 and 19.3) using inclined
manometers which are very accurate for low pressures measurements. Due
to high inertia of inclined manometers the unsteady pressure oscillations
are not captured. Position of measurement points is shown in Fig. 19.1
(points 1; 10 ; 100 , 5; 50 ; 500 and 9; 90 ; 900 ). The measurements were performed
with the air speed of 10m=s at 14 degrees of Celsius. Reynolds number
based on the maximum transversal body size is around 1:33 105 . In the
second series the measurements were performed at nine points 1; :::; 9 shown
in Fig. 19.3(right) only at z D 0:418 (waist). This more detailed investigation
was carried out for two air speeds of 10 and 15 m=s.
199 Month 16
I was a construction Mo
supervisor ina const
I was
the North Sea super
advising and the No
Real work he
helping foremen advis
International
al opportunities
Internationa
�ree wo
work
or placements ssolve problems
Real work he
helping fo
International
Internationaal opportunities
�ree wo
work
or placements ssolve pr
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
199
200
k D 0:22 C c1 p C c2 p 2 (19.1)
where k is the thermal conductivity coefficient in W=mK, C1 D 9:322
104 mKP
W
a
and C2 D 9:775 106 mKPW
a2
. Fig. 19.4 shows distribution of the
thermal conductivity around the body at three sections along the human
body. As seen the conductivity can201 increase in the stagnation area at the
chest up to four and half times for strong wind of 20 m/s. To estimate the
integral wind influence f the thermal conductivity referred to that without
wind was integrated over the body at five sections:
I
f .z/ D k.wi nd ¤ 0/=k.wi nd D 0/r d# (19.2)
where # and r are zylindrical coordinates in a cross section. The results are
summarized in the table 19.1. At strong wind of 20 m/s or 72 km/h the
integral
Downloadincrease of at
free eBooks thermal conductivity can be up to seventy percent in the
bookboon.com
chest cross section. At moderate wind of 10 m/s the maximum influence is
194
less than ten percent.
where # and r are zylindrical coordinates in a cross section. The results are
summarized in the table 19.1. At strong wind of 20 m/s or 72 km/h the
integral increase of thermal conductivity can be up to seventy percent in the
chest cross section. At moderate wind of 10 m/s the maximum influence is
less than ten percent.
202
t t
D (20.1)
cp P rt
The turbulent kinematic viscosity is computed from the URANS closure mod-
els (see Chapters 12, 13 and 14) whereas the turbulent Prandtl number is
assumed to be constant P r t 0:7. The URANS closure model used in this
work is the k ! SST model [45]. Numerical simulations were performed
using the finite volume method (see Chapter 6). Boundary conditions are
given in the table 20.1.
A few selected results of calculations are illustrated in Fig. 20.3. The distri-
butions of air velocity and temperature inside of the car cabin are strongly
inhomogeneous. In regions of strong velocity the convective heat transfer
dominates whereas in stagnation areas 205 the heat exchange is mostly due to
the heat conduction.
Figure 20.2: Grids with 6.5 million of cells generated with snappyHexMesh.
197
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Simulation of human comfort conditions in car cabins
207
198
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Bibliography
Bibliography
Bibliography
[1] Tsinober A. An informal introduction to turbulence. Kluwer Academic
Publisher, 2004.
[1] Tsinober A. An informal introduction to turbulence. Kluwer Academic
[2] Publisher,
Novieto D.2004.
Zhang Y. and Yingchun J. Human envoronmental heat trans-
fer simulation with cfd- the advances and challenges.building simulation
[2] Novieto D. Zhang
2009. pages Y. andEleventh
2162–2168. Yingchun J. Human envoronmental
International heat trans-
IBPSA Conference, Glas-
fer
gow,simulation
Scotland,with
Julycfd- the 2009
27–30, advances
2009.and challenges.building simulation
2009. pages 2162–2168. Eleventh International IBPSA Conference, Glas-
[3] gow, Scotland,
Ferziger J. and July
Peric27–30, 2009 2009.
M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics.
Springer, 2002.
[3] Ferziger J. and Peric M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics.
[4] Springer,
Seibold B.2002.
A compact and fast matlab code solving the incompress-
ible navier-stokes equations on rectangular domains. Applied Mathemat-
[4] ics,
Seibold B. A compact
Massachusetts and offast
Institute matlab code
Technology, solving the incompress-
www-math.mit.edu/ seibold,
ible
2008.navier-stokes equations on rectangular domains. Applied Mathemat-
ics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, www-math.mit.edu/ seibold,
[5] 2008.
Dornseifer T. Griebel M. and Neunhoeffer T. Numerical simulation in
fluid dynamics: A practical introduction. Society for Industrial and
[5] Applied
Dornseifer T. Griebel M.
Mathematics, and Neunhoeffer
Philadelphia, PA, USA,T. 1998.
Numerical simulation in
fluid dynamics: A practical introduction. Society for Industrial and
Applied Mathematics,
[6] Phillips A.B. Turnock Philadelphia,
S.R. and FurlongPA, M.
USA, 1998.simulations of static
Urans
drift and dynamic manouveres of the KVLCC2 tanker. pages F63–F68.
[6] Proceedings
Phillips A.B.ofTurnock S.R. and
the SIMMAN Furlong 2008.
workshop, M. Urans simulations of static
drift and dynamic manouveres of the KVLCC2 tanker. pages F63–F68.
Proceedings
[7] Liseikin of the
V. Grid SIMMAN Methods.
Generation workshop,Springer,
2008. 2010. 390p.
[7] Liseikin
[8] V. Grid
Warsi Z.U.A Generation
Thompson I.F. Methods.
and MastinSpringer, 2010. 390p.grid genera-
C.W. Numerical
tion. Foundations and applications, 1997.
[8] Warsi Z.U.A Thompson I.F. and Mastin C.W. Numerical grid genera-
tion. Foundations
[9] Novikov and applications,
E. Generalized dynamics1997.
of three-dimensional singularities
(vortons). Sov. JETP, 84(3):975 – 981, 1984.
[9] Novikov E. Generalized dynamics of three-dimensional singularities
(vortons).
[10] Chorin Sov. evolution
A. The JETP, 84(3):975 – 981, vortex.
of a turbulent 1984. Comm. in Mathematical
Physics, 83:517 – 535, 1982.
[10] Chorin A. The evolution of a turbulent vortex. Comm. in Mathematical
Physics, 83:517 – 535, 1982.
209
209
[6] Phillips A.B. Turnock S.R. and Furlong M. Urans simulations of static
drift and dynamic manouveres of the KVLCC2 tanker. pages F63–F68.
Proceedings of the SIMMAN workshop, 2008.
[8] Warsi Z.U.A Thompson I.F. and Mastin C.W. Numerical grid genera-
tion. Foundations and applications, 1997.
[15] Below I.A. and Isaev S.A. Modelling of turbulent flows. Saint Petersburg,
(2001).
[17] Peng S. Hybrid rans-les modeling based on zero- and one- equation
models for turbulent flow simulation. pages 1159 – 1164. Proc. of 4th
Int. Symp. Turb. and Shear Flow Phenomena, 2005.
[23] Spalart P.R. Detached-eddy simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 41:181
– 202, 2009.
[24]
[24] Menter
Menter F.
F. and
and Egorov
Egorov J.
J. Turbulence
210
Turbulence models
models based
based on
on the
the length-scale
length-scale
equation.
equation. pages 941 – 946. Proc. of
pages 941 – 946. Proc. of 4th
4th Int. Symp. Turb. and
Int. Symp. Turb. and Shear
Shear
Flow
Flow Phenomena,
Phenomena, 2005.
2005.
[25] Davidson
[25] Davidson L.L. and
and Billson
Billson M.
M. Hybrid
Hybrid les-rans
les-rans using
using synthesized
synthesized turbulent
turbulent
fluctuations
fluctuations for forcing in the interface region. Int. J. of Heat and Fluid,
for forcing in the interface region. Int. J. of Heat and Fluid,
27:1028 – 1042, 2006.
27:1028 – 1042, 2006.
[26]
[26] Abe
Abe K.
K. and
and Miyata
Miyata Y.
Y. An
An investigation
investigation of
of hybrid
hybrid les/rans
les/rans models
models for
for
predicting flow fields with separation. pages 1153 – 1158. Proc. of 4th
predicting flow fields with separation. pages 1153 – 1158. Proc. of 4th
Int.
Int. Symp.
Symp. Turb.
Turb. and
and Shear
Shear Flow
Flow Phenomena,
Phenomena, 2005.
2005.
[27] Pitsch
[27] H. Schlueter
Pitsch H. Schlueter J.
J. U.
U. and
and Moin
Moin P.
P. onsistent
onsistent boundary
boundary conditions
conditions for
for
integrated les/rans simulations: Les outflow conditions. volume
integrated les/rans simulations: Les outflow conditions. volume 3121,3121,
pages
pages 11 –– 8.
8. AIAA,
AIAA, 2002.
2002.
[28]
[28] Ducros
Ducros F.
F. Benerafa
Benerafa Y.
Y. and
and Sagaut
Sagaut P.
P. Rans/les
Rans/les coupling
coupling using
using aa forcing
forcing
term approach.
term approach. pages
pages 1141
1141 –– 1146.
1146. 4th
4th Int.
Int. Symp.
Symp. Turb.
Turb. and
and Shear
Shear Flow
Flow
Phenomena, 2005.
Phenomena, 2005.
[29] Shchukin
[29]
[29] Kornev N.,E.
Shchukin E.Taranov
KornevA.,
Kornev N.,Shchukin
N., TaranovE.,
Taranov A. and
A. and Kleinsorge
and KleinsorgeL.L.
Kleinsorge L.Development
Development
Development of
hybrid
of
of urans-les
hybrid
hybrid methods
urans-les
urans-les for flow
methods
methods forsimulations
for flow in the ship
flow simulations
simulations in area.
in Oceanstern
the ship
the ship Engineering,
stern area.
area.
Ocean Engineering,
38(16):1831–1838,
Ocean Engineering, 38(16):1831 –– 1838,
20111.
38(16):1831 1838, 2011.
2011.
[30]
[30] Durbin
Durbin P.
P. Near-wall
Near-wall turbulence
turbulence closure
closure modeling
modeling without
without damping
damping func-
func-
tions.
tions. J.
J. Theor.
Theor. Comput.
Comput. Fluid
Fluid Dyn,
Dyn, 1991.
1991.
[31]
[31] Werner
Werner H.
H. and
and Wengle
Wengle H.
H. Large-eddy
Large-eddy simulation
simulation of
of turbulent
turbulent flow
flow over
over
and around a cube in a plate channel. 8th Symposium on Turbulent
and around a cube in a plate channel. 8th Symposium on Turbulent
Shear
Shear Flows,
Flows, 1991.
1991.
[32]
[32] Fureby
Fureby C.
C. Huuva
Huuva T.T. Alin
Alin N.,
N., Bensow
Bensow R.
R. and
and Svennberg
Svennberg U.
U. Current
Current
capabilities
capabilities of des and les for
of des and les for submarines
submarines at straight course.
at straight course. J.
J. Ship
Ship
Research,
Research, 54:184
54:184 –196,
–196, 2010.
2010.
[33]
[33] Guminer
Guminer P.K.
P.K. Thermoregulation
Thermoregulation studying
studying in
in hygiene
hygiene and
and work
work physiol-
physiol-
ogy. Medgiz, Moscow, page 147, 1962.
ogy. Medgiz, Moscow, page 147, 1962.
[34]
[34] Novieto
Novieto
Download D.
D. Zhang
Zhang
free eBooks Y.
Y. and
and Yingchun
Yingchun J.
at bookboon.com J. Human
Human environmental
environmental heat
heat trans-
trans-
fer simulation with cfd the advances
fer simulation with cfd the advances and and challenges. pages 2162 – 2168.
201 challenges. pages 2162 – 2168.
Eleventh
Eleventh International
International IBPSA
IBPSA Conference,
Conference, Glasgow,
Glasgow, Scotland,
Scotland, 2009.
2009.
[35]
[35] Cherunova
Cherunova I.V.
I.V. New
New technologies
technologies of
of heat
heat protection
protection wear
wear design,
design, (in
(in
russian).
russian). Technologies
Technologies of
of textile
textile industry,
industry, pages
pages 51
51 –– 54,
54, 2009.
2009.
[32] Fureby C. Huuva T. Alin N., Bensow R. and Svennberg U. Current
capabilities of des and les for submarines at straight course. J. Ship
Research, 54:184 –196, 2010.
[33] Guminer
Lectures P.K. Thermoregulation
on computational fluid dynamics studying in hygiene and work physiol- Bibliography
ogy. Medgiz, Moscow, page 147, 1962.
[35] Cherunova I.V. New technologies of heat protection wear design, (in
russian). Technologies of textile industry, pages 51 – 54, 2009.
[42] Vitte N.K. Thermal exchange and its hygienic value. State medical
publishing, Kiev, page 145, 1956.
[43] www.hohenstein.de.
[45] Menter F.R. Zonal two equation k-! turbulence models for aerody-
namic flows. AIAA 93-2906, 24th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando,
Florida, 1993.
[46] Ginevsky A.S., Vlasov Ye.V., Karavosov R.K., 2004, Acoustic control of turbulent
jets, Springer, 232 p.
[47]
Kornev N., Zhdanov V. and Hassel E. (2008) Study of scalar macro- and
microstructures in a confined jet, Int. Journal Heat and Fluid Flow, vol. 29/3,
665–674.
[48] Frick P., Turbulence, Models and Methods, Lecture course, Perm State University,
Vol.~2, pp.~138, 1999.
Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
202
212
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Index
Index
"-Equation, 141 continuity equation, 17
a-posteriori test, 158 convective acceleration, 24
"-Equation, 143 energy containing range, 120
a-priori test, 158
energycorrelation function, 101
production, 117
a-posteriori
alternating test,implicit,
direction 160 49 Courant Friedrich
ensemble averaged quantity,Levy criterion,
10237
a-priori test,
amplification 160
of the vorticity, 81 Crank-Nicolson
experiment scheme, 89
of Reynolds, 31
alternating
artificial direction
viscosity, 33 implicit, 49 cross
explicit stress, 157,
scheme, 31 158
amplification of the vorticity, 84
autocorrelation function, 101 explicit time advance, 39
artificial viscosity, 33
density, 25
autocorrelation function, 102 Finite Volume Method, 55
backward difference scheme, 27 Detached Eddy Simulation, 161, 163
folding, 85
backward
Biot-Savart law,difference
80 scheme, 28 Direct Numericalscheme,
Simulation,
forward difference 28123
Biot-Savart
block structured law,
grids, 83
74 Dirichlet condition, 26, 48
Fourier law, 25
block structured grids, 75
body forces, 17 dissipation,
fractional step 139methods, 50
body forces, 18
boundary conditions, 24, 26 dissipation
friction velocity, range,
95 120
boundary conditions, 24, 26
Boussinesq hypothesis, 144 Friedman-Keller
dissipation rate,problem,
117 138
Boussinesq hypothesis, 132
buffer
bufferlayer, 98 99
layer, Dynamic Smagorinsky Model, 152
Galilean invariance, 159
energy containing range, 120
central
central difference
difference scheme,
scheme, 28 28 energy production,
heat conduction 117
coefficient, 26
collocated grid, 41 heat conduction
ensemble averaged quantity, 10026
equation, 25,
collocated grid, 41
constant of Karman, 99 heat flux, 25 of Reynolds, 87
constant of Karman, 97 experiment
continuity equation, 17 heat sources, 25
Excellent acceleration,
convective Economics and 23
Business programmes at:
homogeneous turbulence, 102
correlation function, 102 hybrid URANS-LES methods, 163
Courant Friedrich Levy criterion, 37
Crank-Nicolson scheme, 31 implicit scheme, 31
cross stress, 158, 159 inertial subrange, 119, 120
inner energy balance equation, 25
density, 25 integral length, 102
Detached Eddy Simulation, 163, 164 isotropic turbulence, 102
Direct Numerical Simulation, 123
Dirichlet condition, 26, 48
“The perfect start
k - " Model, 141
dissipation, 139
dissipation range, 120
of a successful,
k-Equation, 141
Kelvin Helmholtz instability, 91
dissipation rate, 117
Dynamic Smagorinsky Model, 154
international career.”
Kolmogorov first similarity hypothe-
sis, 118
213
CLICK HERE
to discover why both socially
and academically the University
of Groningen is one of the best
places for a student to be
www.rug.nl/feb/education
implicit scheme, 31
overset or chimera grids, 75
inertial subrange, 119, 120
inner energy balance equation, 25
pairing, 89
integral length, 102
PISO algorithm, 70
isotropic turbulence, 103
Poisson equation, 39
Prandtl mixing length model, 96
k - " Model, 139
pressure, 23
k-Equation, 139
pressure correction method, 64
Kelvin Helmholtz instability, 89
Kolmogorov first similarity hypothesis, 117 probability density function, 109
204
Lectures on computational fluid dynamics Index
205