Rubrics For IPCRF For Teachers

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Negros Island Region
DIVISION OF NEGROS OCCIDENTAL
Cottage Road, Bacolod City

RUBRICS FOR RATING INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT OF TEACHERS

Performance Indicators Rubrics Final Output


Key Result Areas Wt. R Efficiency Effectiveness Time
1. Instructional
Competence (65 %)
1.1 Planning and Evaluation(15%)

DLL prepared
1.1.1 Prepared and 100% of required weekly /LPs daily
implemented the required LPs/daily logs prepared LPs/daily logs prepared are an afternoon
numbers of daily logs/LPs for (a)complete,(b)there is
and taught. before scheduled
the subject taught-( 5 %0 alignment of all parts, viz-a – time of delivery
vi(c)z CG/PELC, within the
(d)Budget Outlay, Summary of Daily
(e)contextualized/ localized logs checked by
5 when necessary School Head

DLL prepared
90-99% of required weekly /LPs daily
LPs/daily logs prepared 2 hours before
and taught. scheduled time of
delivery
4 Presence of 4 indicators

DLL prepared
80-89% of required weekly /LPs daily
LPs/daily logs prepared one time before
and taught. scheduled date of
delivery
3 Presence of 3 indicators

DLL prepared
70-79% of required weekly /LPs daily
LPs/daily logs prepared 30 minutes
and taught. before scheduled
date of delivery

2 Presence of 2 indicators

DLL prepared
69% and below of weekly /LPs daily
required LPs/daily logs on scheduled time
prepared and taught. of delivery
1 Presence of 1 indicators

At least 4 materials for aligned with the (a) prepared 2 days


1.1.2 Prepared ,developed and every lesson objective,(b) appropriate before Summary of
utilized support instructional (c),cost effective,(d) Materials developed
materials for instruction(10%) 5 contextualized and samples

At least 3 materials for prepared 1 days


every lesson before
4 3 indicators present

At least 2 materials for prepared 6 hours


every lesson before
3 2 indicators present
At least 1 material for prepared 3 hours
every lesson before
2 1 indicator present

no material prepared one hour


prepared/developed before the lesson
1 no indicator present
1.2 Assessing and Reporting Pupils' Progress(10%)

records were (a) complete,


1.2.1 Maintained (b) accurate, ( c) up to date,
Updated School (d) no erasures, ( e ) filed 5 working days
Records of pupils
100 % of requred school properly for easy access days after the
5% 5 records quarterly exam

6 working days
a. SF 1,SF2,SF3 90-99 % % of requred Presence of 4 indicators after the quarterly
4 school records exam
b. SF 5, Class
7 workingdays
record, Test 80-89% of requred school after the quarterly
notebook 3 records presence of 3 indicators exam
c. Card,Form
8 working days
137,anecdotal 70-79 % of requred after the quarterly
record 2 school records presence of 2 indicators exam

9 working days
60% and below of after the quarterly
1 requred school records presence of 1 indicators exam

Class Records/Record
At least 5 PTA Book/Report
meetings/dialogues/conf
Updated parents on Card/Permanent
erences to report pupils Records/Anecdotal
children’s progress progress
and problems through Resulted to 100 % resolution Records
dialogues, conferences of problems/concerns in Conducted as
and PTA meetings 5% 5 pupils rating, behavior, etc. scheduled

At least 4 PTA
meetings/dialogues/conf Resulted to 90-99 %
erences to report pupils resolution of
progress problems/concerns in pupils Conducted one
4 rating, behavior, etc. day after schedule

At least 3 PTA
meetings/dialogues/conf Resulted to 80-89 %
erences to report pupils resolution of
progress problems/concerns in pupils Conducted 2 days
3 rating, behavior, etc. after schedule

At least 2 PTA
meetings/dialogues/conf Resulted to 70-79 %
erences to report pupils resolution of
progress problems/concerns in pupils Conducted 3 days
2 rating, behavior, etc. after schedule

At least 1 PTA
meetings/dialogues/conf Resulted to 60-69 %
erences to report pupils resolution of
progress problems/concerns in pupils Conducted 4 days
1 rating, behavior, etc. after schedule

1.3 Teaching- Learning( 40%)

1.3.1 Accounted for Learning


Outcomes and Other
Performance indicators- 40 %
1.3.1 Quarterly
Exam/Periodical report submitted
Test/NAT 75 % and above proficiency after 5 working
level (no of pupils who got 75 days days after
-15% 5 75 % and above MPS % and above mastery the quarterly exam

report submitted
after 6 working
4 70-74 % MPS 70-74 % proficiency level days

report submitted
after 7 working
3 65-69% MPS 65-69 % proficiency level days

report submitted
after 8 working
2 60-64 % MPS 60-64 % proficiency level days

report submitted
59 % and below proficiency after 9 working
1 59 % and below level days
8 school days
61%-64 % MPS 60-64 %pupils got 75 %PL
2 after the exam

9 school days
59 & below pupils got 75 after the exam
1 below 60%MPS %PL

achieved within 6
100 % of students can months PHIL IRI and Other
read with fluency in 100 % reading Reading
1.3.2 Reading Level 10% 5 English and Filipino comprehension Measurement Tool

90-99 % of students can achieved within 7


read with fluency in 90-99 % reading months
4 English and Filipino comprehension

80-89 % of students can achieved within 8


read with fluency in 80-89 % reading months
3 English and Filipino comprehension

70-79% of students can achieved within 9


read with fluency in 70-79 % reading months
2 English and filipino comprehension

60-69% of students can achieved within 10


read with fluency in 60-69 % reading months
1 English and Filipino comprehension

decrease made 6
100 % numerates months after
intervention
at least an average MPS of 85
1.3.3 Numeracy 5% 5 % and above in all operations

7 months after
90-99% numerates
at least an average MPS of 80 intervention
4 % and above in all operations

8 months after
80-89% numerates
at least an average MPS of 75 intervention
3 % and above in all operations
(for elem)
9 months after
70-79% numerates
at least an average MPS of 70 intervention
2 % and above in all operations

69 % and below 10 months after


numerates at least an average MPS of 65 intervention
1 % and above in all operations

decrease made 6
100 % numerates months after
intervention
at least an average MPS of
1.3.3 Numeracy 5% 5 100 % in all operations

7 months after
90-99% numerates
at least an average MPS of 95 intervention
4 % and above in all operations

(for secondary)
8 months after
80-89% numerates
at least an average MPS of 85 intervention
3 % and above in all operations
(for secondary)
9 months after
70-79% numerates
at least an average MPS of 80 intervention
2 % and above in all operations

69 % and below 10 months after


numerates at least an average MPS of 75 intervention
1 % and above in all operations

(a)track pupils at risk every intervention made


rating period,(b) identify 5 days before
gaps, (c )designed and
(d)implemented intervention every rating period

1.3.4 Promotion 5% 5 100 % promotion

intervention made
4 days before
indicators a, c and d every other rating
period
4 90-99%

intervention made
3 days every
rating period
3 80-89% indicators a,b and d

intervention made
2 days before
rating period
2 70-79% indicators a and d

intervention made
a day before every
rating period
1 60% and below indicator a only

submitted 2 days
after last school Summary of Daily
day Attendance by
records are (a) complete,(b)
1.3.5 Average daily accurate, (c ) verified as to Month attached to
percentage of 100% average daily authenticity and (d) duly daily checking of
Attendance 5% 5 attendance attested attendance
submitted 3 days
presence of indicators a,c after last school
4 90-99% and d day

submitted4 days
after last school
3 80-89% indicators a,b and c day

submitted 5 days
after last school
2 69% and below indicators a and b day

submitted 6 days
after last school
1 90-99% indicators a day

5. Pr0fessional Growth and


Development iuncluding
Research -10%

Summary of
professional
5.1 Attended meetings /inset and
professional iother related
meetings, in-service activities attended
trainings and related attached to the
has shown 25 % and above training passbook
activities for self- 100% of all required improvement in the and result of
growth and meetings/inset and other teaching-learning delivery improvement seen Teacher's
advancement. 5% 5 related activities over the baseline result after 6 months Assessment
90-99 % of all required
meetings/inset and other has shown 20 % and above
related activities improvement in the improvement seen
4 teaching-learning activity after 7 months

80-89 % of all required


meetings/inset and other has shown 15 % and above
related activities improvement in the improvement seen
3 teaching-learning activity after 8 months

70-79 % of all required


meetings/inset and other
related activities has shown 10 % and above
improvement in the improvement seen
2 teaching-learning activity after 9 months

69% and below of all


required meetings/inset
and other related
activities has shown 5 % and above
improvement in the improvement seen
1 teaching-learning activity after 10 months
Copy of Conducted
Problems were (a)clearly
Action Research
identified and defined, (b) with the approved
several alternatives were preface,
school wide problem certification when
5.2 Conducted in- proposed and selected(c),
depth studies or findings were reported and and how
action researches on (d) shared. 5 working days results/findings
instructional problems 5% 5 before due date were shared

two or more grade


level
4 working days
4 indicators a, c and d before due date

one grade level


3 working days
3 indicators a, b and c before due date

one class
2 working days
2 indicators a and b before due date

none 1 working day


1 indicators a only before due date

6. School and Community


Involvement-
10%

6.1 Get involved in


school and community
activities and 100 % of the required
school, community and Excellent rating from Summary of
maintained superior, students, co- Activities
harmonious civic organization teachers and local officials Participated with
relationships with activities
superiors, students, the result of
local and public rating submitted evaluation duly
officials and co- to SH 5 w/D before signed by the SH,
teachers . 10% 5 due date pictorial evidences
90-99 % of the required
school, community and
civic organization Very Satisfactory rating from rating submitted
activities superior, students, co- to SH 4 w/D before
4 teachers and local officials due date

80-89 % of the required


school, community and
civic organization
activities Satisfactory rating from rating submitted
superior, students, co- to SH 3 w/D before
3 teachers and local officials due date
70-79 % of the required
school, community and
civic organization Fair rating from superior, rating submitted
activities students, co-teachers and to SH 2 w/D before
2 local officials due date
69 % and below of the
required school,
community and civic Poor rating from superior,
organization activities students, co-teachers and rating submitted
1 local officials to SH on due date

not more than


not more than 3 times 4 times absent except for 5 – Submitted DTR
tardy or under time absences applied in one day after end
during the last 6 months accordance with regulations of the month.

DTR, Summary
Report of
7. Punctuality and Attendance and
Attendance 15% 5 Absences
not more than 5 to 8
4 to 6 times tardy 4 – Two days after.
4 absences
not more than 9 to 12 3 – Three days
3 7 to 10 times tardy absences after.
- not more than 13 to 16
11 to 15 times tardy 2 – Four days after.
2 absences

more than 15 times tardy


1 17 or more times absent 1 – A week after

100 % of targets performed with very high


sense of efficiency and
8. Plus factor 5% 5 effectiveness as planned

(but reduce
punctuality and 90 % of targets
performed with high sense of a week after the
attendance) 4 efficiency and effectiveness planned date

80 % of targets performed with moderate


sense of efficiency and 2 weeks after
3 effectiveness planned date

70 % of targets
performed with minimal 3 weeks after
2 efficiency and effectiveness planned date

60 % of targets
performed with no sense of 4 weeks after
1 efficiency and effectiveness planned date
TOTAL 100%

Core Competencies and Additional Competencies-0%

Manifested the core Checklist of


competencies and 4 out of 6 Core competencies duly
additional competencies and 1 out evaluation accomplished and
competencies within of 3 additional submitted 5 W/D developmental areas
the year. 5 competencies rated 5 or role model before due date with Action Plan

3 out of 6 Core
competencies and 1 out
of 3 additional evaluation
competencies rated as 4 submitted 6 W/D
4 rated as 4 before due date

2 out of 6 Core
competencies and 1 out
of 3 additional evaluation
competencies rated as 4 submitted 7 W/D
3 rated as 3 before due date
1 out of 6 core
competencies an d no
additional competencies evaluation
submitted 8 W/D
2 rated as 2 before due date

1-no manifestation
evaluation
submitted 9 W/D
rated as 1 before due date
TOTAL 100%

Note: If the Teachers have plus factors, may reduce Punctuality and attendance by 5 % and add
another KRA: Plus Factors. Provided there is a target on efficiency, effectiveness
and also prepare the corresponding rubrics.

Summary of Weights
1. Instructional Competence 65%
Lesson Planning 5%
ISM preparation /utilization 10%
Assessing and Reporting Pupils Progress 10%
Accounted for Learning Outcomes 40%
5. Professional Growth and Development with research 10%
6. Community Involvement 10%
7. Punctuality and Attendance 15%
Total 100%

You might also like