Scribd
Upload
3K views1 page

Con Law First Amendment Checklist

Uploaded by

ferndog45
This document provides a 7-step checklist for analyzing restrictions on speech under the First Amendment: 1) Determine if the government is restricting speech; 2) If the restriction is based on content, determine if the speech falls into an unprotected category or is commercial/defamatory speech; 3) Content-based restrictions must pass strict scrutiny unless an exception applies; 4) Content-neutral restrictions are subject to intermediate scrutiny; 5) Consider additional factors like the forum of the speech or if it pertains to minors; 6) Determine if the regulation is vague or overbroad.

Copyright:

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

Available Formats

Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
3K views1 page

Con Law First Amendment Checklist

Uploaded by

ferndog45
This document provides a 7-step checklist for analyzing restrictions on speech under the First Amendment: 1) Determine if the government is restricting speech; 2) If the restriction is based on content, determine if the speech falls into an unprotected category or is commercial/defamatory speech; 3) Content-based restrictions must pass strict scrutiny unless an exception applies; 4) Content-neutral restrictions are subject to intermediate scrutiny; 5) Consider additional factors like the forum of the speech or if it pertains to minors; 6) Determine if the regulation is vague or overbroad.

Copyright:

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

Available Formats

Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

First Amendment Checklist Prof. M.

Strauss
Adapted from Eugene Volokh, The First Amendment (2001)

1. Is the Government restricting Speech?


Government---speech both relevant concepts!
2. Is the restriction based on the CONTENT of the Speech (ie, is the government
restricting speech because of its communicative content—because of the message the
speech communicates to its listeners or because of the consequences that flow from
the message? If so, go to #3. If not, go to # 5
3. If the restriction is based on the content of the speech:
a. Does the speech fall within a category of “unprotected speech?” does the
speech constitute incitement? Obscenity? Fighting words? Threats? Child
pornography? IF THE SPEECH FALLS WITHIN ONE OF THESE
CATEGORIES---FOLLOW THE RULE FOR THE PARTICULAR
CATEGORY
b. Is the speech less protected commercial speech, and thus subject to
intermediate scrutiny (plus)?
c. Is the speech defamatory, and thus subject to the specific rules on libel based
on who the plaintiff is?

4. If the content based regulation does not fall within one of the recognized categories of
unprotected speech, and isn’t commercial speech or libel, then the regulation of the
speech is invalid unless the law passes strict scrutiny? (eg: indecency)
5. If the government is restricting speech for reasons unrelated to its communicative
impact (ie, as a content neutral, time, place and manner regulation) then apply an
intermediate scrutiny test to the law.
6. Are there other aspects of the law that merit attention. Ie, does the law/regulation
focus on the place of speech so that forum analysis is relevant? Does the law pertain
to minors?
7. Is the regulation vague or overbroad?

You might also like