0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views5 pages

Lecture8 PDF

The document discusses metrics and Riemannian geometry. It provides examples of calculating the metric tensor coefficients in 3D Euclidean space for different coordinate systems like Cartesian, cylindrical polar, and spherical polar coordinates. It also discusses how the metric tensor transforms under coordinate transformations while the underlying geometry remains the same. Further, it describes constructing the metric of a 2D surface like the surface of a sphere embedded in 3D space, which represents a space of constant curvature.

Uploaded by

Shakir Khattak
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views5 pages

Lecture8 PDF

The document discusses metrics and Riemannian geometry. It provides examples of calculating the metric tensor coefficients in 3D Euclidean space for different coordinate systems like Cartesian, cylindrical polar, and spherical polar coordinates. It also discusses how the metric tensor transforms under coordinate transformations while the underlying geometry remains the same. Further, it describes constructing the metric of a 2D surface like the surface of a sphere embedded in 3D space, which represents a space of constant curvature.

Uploaded by

Shakir Khattak
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 5

Lecture 8

Metrics

Objectives:

• More on the metric and how it transforms.

Reading: Hobson, 2.

8.1 Riemannian Geometry

The interval
ds2 = gαβ dxα dxβ ,
is a quadratic function of the coordinate differentials.
This is the definition of Riemannian geometry, or more correctly, pseudo-Riemannian
geometry to allow for ds2 < 0.

Example 8.1 What are the coefficients of the metric tensor in 3D Euclidean
space for Cartesian, cylindrical polar and spherical polar coordinates?

Answer 8.1 The “interval” in Euclidean geometry can be written in Carte-


sian coordinates as Introducing an
2 2 2 2
ds = dx + dy + dz . obvious notation
The metric tensor’s coefficients are therefore given by with x standing
for the x
gxx = gyy = gzz = 1, coordinate index,
etc.
with all others = 0.
In cylindrical polars:
ds2 = dr2 + r2 dφ2 + dz 2 ,

30
LECTURE 8. METRICS 31

so grr = 1, gφφ = r2 , gzz = 1 and all others = 0.


Finally spherical polars:

ds2 = dr2 + r2 dθ2 + r2 sin2 θdφ2 ,

gives grr = 1, gθθ = r2 and gφφ = r2 sin2 θ.

Example 8.2 Calculate the metric tensor in 3D Euclidean space for the
coordinates u = x + 2y, v = x − y, w = z.

Answer 8.2 The inverse transform is easily shown to be x = (u + 2v)/3,


y = (u − v)/3, z = w, so
1 2
dx = du + dv,
3 3
1 1
dy = du − dv,
3 3
dz = dw,

so
µ ¶2 µ ¶2
2 1 2 1 1
ds = du + dv + du − dv + dw2 ,
3 3 3 3
2 2 5 2 2
= du + dv + dudv + dw2 .
9 9 9
We can immediately write guu = 2/9, gvv = 5/9, gww = 1, and guv = gvu =
1/9 since the metric is symmetric. This metric still describes 3D Euclidean
flat geometry, although not obviously.

8.2 Metric transforms

The method of the example is often the easiest way to transform metrics,
however using tensor transformations, we can write more compactly:

∂xγ ∂xδ
gα′ β ′ = gγδ .
∂xα′ ∂xβ ′
This shows how the components of the metric tensor transform under coor-
dinate transformations but the underlying geometry does not change.

Example 8.3 Use the transformation of g to derive the metric components


in cylindrical polars, starting from Cartesian coordinates.
LECTURE 8. METRICS 32

Answer 8.3 We must compute terms like ∂x/∂r, so we need x, y and z in


terms of r, φ, z:

x = r cos φ,
y = r sin φ,
z = z.

Find ∂x/∂r = cos φ, ∂y/∂r = sin φ, ∂z/∂r = 0. Consider the grr component:

∂xi ∂xj
grr = gij ,
∂r ∂r
where i and j represent x, y or z. Since gij = 1 for i = j and 0 otherwise,
and since ∂z/∂r = 0, we are left with:
µ ¶2 µ ¶ 2
∂x ∂y
grr = +
∂r ∂r
2 2
= cos φ + sin φ = 1.

Similarly
µ ¶2 µ ¶2
∂x ∂y
gθθ = + = (−r sin φ)2 + (r cos φ)2 = r2 ,
∂φ ∂φ

and gzz = 1, as expected.

This may seem a very difficult way to deduce a familiar result, but the point is
that it transforms a problem for which one otherwise needs to apply intuition
and 3D visualisation into a mechanical procedure that is not difficult – at
least in principle – and can even be programmed into a computer.

8.3 First curved-space metric

We can now start to look at curved spaces. A very helpful one is the surface
of a sphere.
LECTURE 8. METRICS 33

Figure: Surface of a sphere parameterised by distance r from


a point and azimuthal angle φ
The sketch shows
Two coordinates are needed to label the surface. e.g. the distance from a the surface
point along the surface, r, and the azimuthal angle φ, similar to Euclidean “embedded” in
polar coords. 3D. This is a
priviledged view
The distance AP is given by R sin θ, so a change dφ corresponds to distance that is not always
R sin θ dφ. Thus the metric is possible. You
ds2 = dr2 + R2 sin2 θ dφ2 . need to try to
imagine that you
or since r = Rθ, ³r´ are actually stuck
2 2 2 2 2 in the surface
ds = dr + R sin dφ .
R with no “height”
This is the metric of a 2D space of constant curvature. dimension.
Circumference of circle in this geometry: set dr = 0, integrate over φ
r
C = 2πR sin < 2πr.
R
e.g. On Earth (R = 6370 km), circle with r = 10 km shorter by 2.6 cm than
if Earth was flat.
Exactly the same is possible in 3D. i.e we could find that a circle radius r
has a circumference < 2πr owing to gravitationally induced curvature.

8.4 2D spaces of constant curvature

Can construct metric of the surface of a sphere as follows. First write the
equation of a sphere in Euclidean 3D
x2 + y 2 + z 2 = R 2 .
LECTURE 8. METRICS 34

If we switch to polars (r, θ) in the x–y plane, this becomes

r 2 + z 2 = R2 .

In the same terms the Euclidean metric is

dl2 = dr2 + r2 dθ2 + dz 2 .

But we can use the restriction to a sphere to eliminate dz which implies

2r dr + 2z dz = 0,

and so
r2 dr2
dl2 = dr2 + r2 dθ2 + ,
z2
which reduces to
dr2
dl2 = + r2 dθ2 .
1 − r2 /R2
Defining curvature k = 1/R2 , we have

dr2
dl2 = + r2 dθ2 ,
1 − kr2
the metric of a 2D space of constant curvature. k > 0 can be “embedded”
in 3D as the surface of a sphere; k < 0 cannot, but it is still a perfectly valid
geometry. [A saddle shape has negative curvature over a limited region.]
A very similar procedure can be used to construct the spatial part of the
metric describing the Universe.

You might also like