CSD 205-Design and Analysis of Algorithms-Spring2018 PDF
CSD 205-Design and Analysis of Algorithms-Spring2018 PDF
The minimum pass marks for each course shall be 50%. Students obtaining less than 50% marks in
any course shall be deemed to have failed in that course. The correspondence between letter grades ,
credit points, and percentage marks at CIIT shall be as follows:
Grades Letter Grade Credit Points Percentage Marks
A ( Excellent) 4.0 90and above
A- 3.7 85-89
B+ 3.3 80-84
B (Good) 3.0 75-79
B- 2.7 70-74
C+ 2.3 65-69
C (Average) 2.0 60-64
C- 1.7 55-59
D (Minimum passing) 1.3 50-54
F (Failing) 0.0 Less than 50
Note: The marks to be assigned to students shall be in whole numbers and are not same as followed
in the annual system of Lancaster University.
15 Assessment Schedule
Week 3 Quiz 01, Assignment 01
Week 5 Quiz 02, Assignment 02
Week 7 Sessional-I
Week 10 Quiz 03, Assignment 03
Week 13 Sessional-II
Week 15 Quiz 04. Assignment 04
Week 18-19 Terminal Examination
16. Format of Assignment
This course indoctrinates the following format for all its assignments:
1. Paper Size: A4
2. Left Margin: 2 Inches
3. Right Margin: 1 Inch
4. Top Margin: 0.5 Inch
5. Bottom Margin: 0.5 Inch
6. Font: Times New Roman
7. Font Size:
a. Main Heading 14
b. Sub Heading 12
c. Text 12
d. Titles 16
8. Font Color: Black
9. Line Spacing: 1.5
10. Diagrams & Charts: Need not be colored
11. Title page must be designed as guided by resource person in class
12. Number of Pages: No Limit
13. Reference Style: APA (If applicable)
17. Text Book i. T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, and R. L. Rivest
(2009),Introduction to Algorithms, (3rd Ed.) MIT Press,
McGraw-Hill, New York.
18. Reference Books I. Algorithms, Robert Sedgewick, Edition 2nd,
II. Compared to What? An Introduction to the Analysis of
Algorithms, by G.J.E Rawlins
III. The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms, by
Alfred V. Aho
19. Plagiarism
Plagiarism involves the unacknowledged use of someone else’s work, usually in coursework, and passing it
off as if it were one’s own. Many students who submit apparently plagiarised work probably do so
inadvertently without realising it because of poorly developed study skills, including note taking,
referencing and citations; this is poor academic practice rather than malpractice. Some students,
particularly those from different cultures and educational systems, find UK academic
referencing/acknowledgement systems and conventions awkward, and proof-reading is not always easy
for dyslexic students and some visually-impaired students. Study skills education within programmes of
study should minimise the number of students submitting poorly referenced work. However, some
students plagiarise deliberately, with the intent to deceive. This intentional malpractice is a conscious, pre-
mediated form of cheating and is regarded as a particularly serious breach of the core values of academic
integrity. The Dual Degree Prorgamme has zero tolerance for intentional plagiarism.
Plagiarism can include the following:
1. collusion, where a piece of work prepared by a group is represented as if it were the student’s
own;
2. commission or use of work by the student which is not his/her own and representing it as if it
were, e.g.:
a. purchase of a paper from a commercial service, including internet sites, whether pre-
written or specially prepared for the student concerned
b. submission of a paper written by another person, either by a fellow student or a person
who is not a member of the university;
3. duplication (of one’s own work) of the same or almost identical work for more than one module;
4. the act of copying or paraphrasing a paper from a source text, whether in manuscript, printed or
electronic form, without appropriate acknowledgement (this includes quoting directly from
another source with a reference but without quotation marks);
5. submission of another student’s work, whether with or without that student’s knowledge or
consent;
6. Directly quoting from model solutions/answers made available in previous years;
7. cheating in class tests, e.g.
a. when a candidate communicates, or attempts to communicate, with a fellow candidate or
individual who is neither an invigilator or member of staff
b. copies, or attempts to copy from a fellow candidate
c. attempts to introduce or consult during the examination any unauthorised printed or written
material, or electronic calculating, information storage device, mobile phones or other
communication device
d. personates or allows himself or herself to be impersonated.
8. Fabrication of results occurs when a student claims to have carried out tests, experiments or
observations that have not taken place or presents results not supported by the evidence with the
object of obtaining an unfair advantage.
These definitions apply to work in whatever format it is presented, including written work, online
submissions, groupwork and oral presentations.
20. Attendance Policy
Every student must attend 80% of the lectures/seminars delivered in this course and 80% of the
practical/laboratory work prescribed for the respective courses. The students falling short of required
percentage of attendance of lectures/seminars/practical/laboratory work, etc., shall not be allowed to
appear in the terminal examination of this course and shall be treated as having failed this course.