Scribd
Upload
28 views1 page

Correlation and Regression

The document analyzes the relationship between preference, nutrition, taste, and preservation quality using correlation and regression. It hypothesizes that there is no significant relationship between the variables. The correlations show a significant relationship between all variables. Regression will be used to identify the impact of the independent variables (nutrition value, taste, preservation quality) on the dependent variable (preference).

Uploaded by

Raman Kulkarni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
28 views1 page

Correlation and Regression

The document analyzes the relationship between preference, nutrition, taste, and preservation quality using correlation and regression. It hypothesizes that there is no significant relationship between the variables. The correlations show a significant relationship between all variables. Regression will be used to identify the impact of the independent variables (nutrition value, taste, preservation quality) on the dependent variable (preference).

Uploaded by

Raman Kulkarni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

Correlation and regression

Objective
To identify the relationship between preference and nutrition, preference and taste,preference
and preservation quality.
Justification
All the variable are on interval scale(quantitative), so we will use correlation.
Hypothesis
H0:There is no significant relationship between preference and nutrition, preference and taste,
preference and preservation quality.(r=0)
There is a significant relationship(r≠0)
Correlations

Nutrition Preservation
Preference Value Taste Quality
Preference Pearson Correlation 1 .810(**) .841(**) .888(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 40 40 40 40
Nutrition Value Pearson Correlation .810(**) 1 .759(**) .719(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 40 40 40 40
Taste Pearson Correlation .841(**) .759(**) 1 .818(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 40 40 40 40
Preservation Quality Pearson Correlation .888(**) .719(**) .818(**) 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 40 40 40 40
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Interpretation
Here p<a/2, for all the combinations i.e. preference and preservation quality, so we reject the null
hypothesis. Thereafter we conclude that there is a significant relationship between all the
variables.
Here the correlation between preference and
To identify the impact of independent variable i.e. nutrition value, taste and preservation quality
on dependent variable i.e. preference.
All the variable are on interval scale so we can use regression analysis.

You might also like