Analytic functions

----->Introduction:-

The main goal of this topic is to define and give some of the important properties of
complex analytic functions. A function f (z) is analytic if it has a complex derivative f 0 (z).
In general, the rules for computing derivatives will be familiar to you from single variable
calculus. However, a much richer set of conclusions can be drawn about a complex analytic
function than is generally true about real differentiable functions.

----->The derivative: preliminaries:-

In calculus we defined the derivative as a limit. In complex analysis we will do the same.

∆f f (z + ∆z) − f (z)
f 0 (z) = lim = lim .
∆z→0 ∆z ∆z→0 ∆z
Before giving the derivative our full attention we are going to have to spend some time
exploring and understanding limits. To motivate this we’ll first look at two simple examples
– one positive and one negative.
Example :- Find the derivative of f (z) = z 2 .
Solution: We compute using the definition of the derivative as a limit.

(z + ∆z)2 − z 2 z 2 + 2z∆z + (∆z)2 − z 2

lim = lim = lim 2z + ∆z = 2z.
∆z→0 ∆z ∆z→0 ∆z ∆z→0

That was a positive example. Here’s a negative one which shows that we need a careful
understanding of limits.
Example :- Let f (z) = z. Show that the limit for f 0 (0) does not converge.
Solution: Let’s try to compute f 0 (0) using a limit:

f (∆z) − f (0) ∆z ∆x − i∆y

f 0 (0) = lim = lim = .
∆z→0 ∆z ∆z→0 ∆z ∆x + i∆y
Here we used ∆z = ∆x + i∆y.
Now, ∆z → 0 means both ∆x and ∆y have to go to 0. There are lots of ways to do this.
For example, if we let ∆z go to 0 along the x-axis then, ∆y = 0 while ∆x goes to 0. In this
case, we would have
∆x
f 0 (0) = lim = 1.
∆x→0 ∆x

On the other hand, if we let ∆z go to 0 along the positive y-axis then

−i∆y
f 0 (0) = lim = −1.
∆y→0 i∆y
The limits don’t agree! The problem is that the limit depends on how ∆z approaches 0. If
we came from other directions we’d get other values. There’s nothing to do, but agree that
the limit does not exist.
Well, there is something we can do: explore and understand limits. Let’s do that now.

------>Open disks, open deleted disks, open regions:-

Definition. The open disk of radius r around z0 is the set of points z with |z − z0 | < r,
i.e. all points within distance r of z0 .
The open deleted disk of radius r around z0 is the set of points z with 0 < |z −z0 | < r. That
is, we remove the center z0 from the open disk. A deleted disk is also called a punctured
disk.

r r
z0 z0

Left: an open disk around z0 ; right: a deleted open disk around z0

Definition. An open region in the complex plane is a set A with the property that every
point in A can be be surrounded by an open disk that lies entirely in A. We will often drop
the word open and simply call A a region.
In the figure below, the set A on the left is an open region because for every point in A we
can draw a little circle around the point that is completely in A. (The dashed boundary
line indicates that the boundary of A is not part of A.) In contrast, the set B is not an
open region. Notice the point z shown is on the boundary, so every disk around z contains
points outside B.

Left: an open region A; right: B is not an open region

------>Limits and continuous functions:-

Definition. If f (z) is defined on a punctured disk around z0 then we say

lim f (z) = w0
z→z0

if f (z) goes to w0 no matter what direction z approaches z0 .

The figure below shows several sequences of points that approach z0 . If lim f (z) = w0 then
z→z0
f (z) must go to w0 along each of these sequences.
 Sequences going to z0 are mapped to sequences going to w0 .
Example :- Many functions have obvious limits. For example:

lim z 2 = 4
z→2

and
lim (z 2 + 2)/(z 3 + 1) = 6/9.
z→2
Here is an example where the limit doesn’t exist because different sequences give different
limits.
Example :- (No limit) Show that
z x + iy
lim = lim
z→0 z z→0 x − iy

does not exist.

Solution: On the real axis we have
z x
= = 1,
z x
so the limit as z → 0 along the real axis is 1.
By contrast, on the imaginary axis we have
z iy
= = −1,
z −iy
so the limit as z → 0 along the imaginary axis is -1. Since the two limits do not agree the
limit as z → 0 does not exist!

-------->Properties of limits:-

We have the usual properties of limits. Suppose

lim f (z) = w1 and lim g(z) = w2

z→z0 z→z0

then

• lim f (z) + g(z) = w1 + w2 .

z→z0

• lim f (z)g(z) = w1 · w2 .
z→z0
 • If w2 6= 0 then lim f (z)/g(z) = w1 /w2
z→z0

• If h(z) is continuous and defined on a neighborhood of w1 then lim h(f (z)) = h(w1 )
z→z0
(Note: we will give the official definition of continuity in the next section.)

We won’t give a proof of these properties. As a challenge, you can try to supply it using
the formal definition of limits given in the appendix.

We can restate the definition of limit in terms of functions of (x, y). To this end, let’s write

f (z) = f (x + iy) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y)

and abbreviate
P = (x, y), P0 = (x0 , y0 ), w0 = u0 + iv0 .
Then (
limP →P0 u(x, y) = u0
lim f (z) = w0 iff
z→z0 limP →P0 v(x, y) = v0 .
Note. The term ‘iff’ stands for ‘if and only if’ which is another way of saying ‘is equivalent
to’.

-------->Continuous functions:-

A function is continuous if it doesn’t have any sudden jumps. This is the gist of the following
definition.
Definition. If the function f (z) is defined on an open disk around z0 and lim f (z) = f (z0 )
z→z0
then we say f is continuous at z0 . If f is defined on an open region A then the phrase ‘f is
continuous on A’ means that f is continuous at every point in A.
As usual, we can rephrase this in terms of functions of (x, y):
Fact. f (z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) is continuous iff u(x, y) and v(x, y) are continuous as
functions of two variables.
Example :- (Some continuous functions)
(i) A polynomial
P (z) = a0 + a1 z + a2 z 2 + . . . + an z n
is continuous on the entire plane. Reason: it is clear that each power (x + iy)k is continuous
as a function of (x, y).
(ii) The exponential function is continuous on the entire plane. Reason:

ez = ex+iy = ex cos(y) + iex sin(y).

So the both the real and imaginary parts are clearly continuous as a function of (x, y).
(iii) The principal branch Arg(z) is continuous on the plane minus the non-positive real
axis. Reason: this is clear and is the reason we defined branch cuts for arg. We have to
remove the negative real axis because Arg(z) jumps by 2π when you cross it. We also have
to remove z = 0 because Arg(z) is not even defined at 0.
(iv) The principal branch of the function log(z) is continuous on the plane minus the non-
positive real axis. Reason: the principal branch of log has

log(z) = log(r) + i Arg(z).

So the continuity of log(z) follows from the continuity of Arg(z).

------->Properties of continuous functions:-

Since continuity is defined in terms of limits, we have the following properties of continuous
functions.
Suppose f (z) and g(z) are continuous on a region A. Then

• f (z) + g(z) is continuous on A.

• f (z)g(z) is continuous on A.

• f (z)/g(z) is continuous on A except (possibly) at points where g(z) = 0.

• If h is continuous on f (A) then h(f (z)) is continuous on A.

Using these properties we can claim continuity for each of the following functions:
2
• ez

• cos(z) = (eiz + e−iz )/2

• If P (z) and Q(z) are polynomials then P (z)/Q(z) is continuous except at roots of
Q(z).

------>The point at infinity:-

By definition the extended complex plane = C∪{∞}. That is, we have one point at infinity
to be thought of in a limiting sense described as follows.
A sequence of points {zn } goes to infinity if |zn | goes to infinity. This “point at infinity”
is approached in any direction we go. All of the sequences shown in the figure below are
growing, so they all go to the (same) “point at infinity”.

Various sequences all going to infinity.

If we draw a large circle around 0 in the plane, then we call the region outside this circle
a neighborhood of infinity.
Im(z)

R
Re(z)

The shaded region outside the circle of radius R is a neighborhood of infinity.

-------->Limits involving infinity:-

The key idea is 1/∞ = 0. By this we mean

1
lim =0
z→∞ z
We then have the following facts:

• lim f (z) = ∞ ⇔ lim 1/f (z) = 0

z→z0 z→z0

• lim f (z) = w0 ⇔ lim f (1/z) = w0

z→∞ z→0

1
• lim f (z) = ∞ ⇔ lim =0
z→∞ z→0 f (1/z)

Example :- lim ez is not defined because it has different values if we go to infinity in

z→∞
different directions, e.g. we have ez = ex eiy and

lim ex eiy = 0
x→−∞
lim ex eiy = ∞
x→+∞
lim ex eiy is not defined, since x is constant, so ex eiy loops in a circle indefinitely.
y→+∞

Example :- Show lim z n = ∞ (for n a positive integer).

z→∞

Solution: We need to show that |z n | gets large as |z| gets large. Write z = Reiθ , then

|z n | = |Rn einθ | = Rn = |z|n

-------->Stereographic projection from the Riemann sphere:-

One way to visualize the point at ∞ is by using a (unit) Riemann sphere and the associated
stereographic projection. The figure below shows a sphere whose equator is the unit circle
in the complex plane.

Stereographic projection from the sphere to the plane.

Stereographic projection from the sphere to the plane is accomplished by drawing the secant
line from the north pole N through a point on the sphere and seeing where it intersects the
plane. This gives a 1-1 correspondence between a point on the sphere P and a point in the
complex plane z. It is easy to see show that the formula for stereographic projection is
a b
P = (a, b, c) 7→ z = +i .
1−c 1−c
The point N = (0, 0, 1) is special, the secant lines from N through P become tangent lines
to the sphere at N which never intersect the plane. We consider N the point at infinity.
In the figure above, the region outside the large circle through the point z is a neighborhood
of infinity. It corresponds to the small circular cap around N on the sphere. That is, the
small cap around N is a neighborhood of the point at infinity on the sphere!
The figure below shows another common version of stereographic projection. In this figure
the sphere sits with its south pole at the origin. We still project using secant lines from the
north pole.

------>Derivatives:-

The definition of the complex derivative of a complex function is similar to that of a real
derivative of a real function: For a function f (z) the derivative f at z0 is defined as

f (z) − f (z0 )
f 0 (z0 ) = lim
z→z0 z − z0

Provided, of course, that the limit exists. If the limit exists we say f is analytic at z0 or f
is differentiable at z0 .
Remember: The limit has to exist and be the same no matter how you approach z0 !
If f is analytic at all the points in an open region A then we say f is analytic on A.
As usual with derivatives there are several alternative notations. For example, if w = f (z)
we can write 
0 dw  f (z) − f (z0 ) ∆w
f (z0 ) = = lim = lim
dz z0 z→z0
 z − z0 ∆z→0 ∆z

Challenge. Use polar coordinates to show the limit in the previous example can be any
value with modulus 1 depending on the angle at which z approaches z0 .

------->Derivative rules:-

It wouldn’t be much fun to compute every derivative using limits. Fortunately, we have the
same differentiation formulas as for real-valued functions. That is, assuming f and g are
differentiable we have:
d
• Sum rule: (f (z) + g(z)) = f 0 + g 0
dz
d
• Product rule: (f (z)g(z)) = f 0 g + f g 0
dz
d f 0g − f g0
• Quotient rule: (f (z)/g(z)) =
dz g2
d
• Chain rule: g(f (z)) = g 0 (f (z))f 0 (z)
dz
df −1 (z) 1
• Inverse rule: = 0 −1
dz f (f (z))

To give you the flavor of these arguments we’ll prove the product rule.
d f (z)g(z) − f (z0 )g(z0 )
(f (z)g(z)) = lim
dz z→z0 z − z0
(f (z) − f (z0 ))g(z) + f (z0 )(g(z) − g(z0 ))
= lim
z→z0 z − z0
f (z) − f (z0 ) (g(z) − g(z0 ))
= lim g(z) + f (z0 )
z→z0 z − z0 z − z0
0 0
= f (z0 )g(z0 ) + f (z0 )g (z0 )

Here is an important fact that you would have guessed. We will prove it in the next section.
Theorem. If f (z) is defined and differentiable on an open disk and f 0 (z) = 0 on the disk
then f (z) is constant.
-------->Cauchy-Riemann equations:-

The Cauchy-Riemann equations are our first consequence of the fact that the limit defining
f (z) must be the same no matter which direction you approach z from. The Cauchy-
Riemann equations will be one of the most important tools in our toolbox.

--------->Partial derivatives as limits:-

Before getting to the Cauchy-Riemann equations we remind you about partial derivatives.
If u(x, y) is a function of two variables then the partial derivatives of u are defined as
∂u u(x + ∆x, y) − u(x, y)
(x, y) = lim ,
∂x ∆x→0 ∆x
i.e. the derivative of u holding y constant.
∂u u(x, y + ∆y) − u(x, y)
(x, y) = lim ,
∂y ∆y→0 ∆y
i.e. the derivative of u holding x constant.

---------->The Cauchy-Riemann equations:-

The Cauchy-Riemann equations use the partial derivatives of u and v to allow us to do two
things: first, to check if f has a complex derivative and second, to compute that derivative.
We start by stating the equations as a theorem.
Theorem :- (Cauchy-Riemann equations) If f (z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) is analytic (com-
plex differentiable) then
∂u ∂v ∂v ∂u
f 0 (z) = +i = −i
∂x ∂x ∂y ∂y
In particular,
∂u ∂v ∂u ∂v
= and =− .
∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x
This last set of partial differential equations is what is usually meant by the Cauchy-Riemann
equations.
Here is the short form of the Cauchy-Riemann equations:

ux = vy
uy = −vx

Proof. Let’s suppose that f (z) is differentiable in some region A and

f (z) = f (x + iy) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y).

We’ll compute f 0 (z) by approaching z first from the horizontal direction and then from the
vertical direction. We’ll use the formula
f (z + ∆z) − f (z)
f 0 (z) = lim ,
∆z→0 ∆z
where ∆z = ∆x + i∆y.
Horizontal direction: ∆y = 0, ∆z = ∆x
f (z + ∆z) − f (z)
f 0 (z) = lim
∆z→0 ∆z
f (x + ∆x + iy) − f (x + iy)
= lim
∆x→0 ∆x
(u(x + ∆x, y) + iv(x + ∆x, y)) − (u(x, y) + iv(x, y))
= lim
∆x→0 ∆x
u(x + ∆x, y) − u(x, y) v(x + ∆x, y) − v(x, y)
= lim +i
∆x→0 ∆x ∆x
∂u ∂v
= (x, y) + i (x, y)
∂x ∂x

Vertical direction: ∆x = 0, ∆z = i∆y (We’ll do this one a little faster.)

f (z + ∆z) − f (z)
f 0 (z) = lim
∆z→0 ∆z
(u(x, y + ∆y) + iv(x, y + ∆y)) − (u(x, y) + iv(x, y))
= lim
∆y→0 i∆y
u(x, y + ∆y) − u(x, y) v(x, y + ∆y) − v(x, y)
= lim +i
∆y→0 i∆y i∆y
1 ∂u ∂v
= (x, y) + (x, y)
i ∂y ∂y
∂v ∂u
= (x, y) − i (x, y)
∂y ∂y

We have found two different representations of f 0 (z) in terms of the partials of u and v. If
put them together we have the Cauchy-Riemann equations:
∂u ∂v ∂v ∂u ∂u ∂v ∂u ∂v
f 0 (z) = +i = −i ⇒ = , and − = .
∂x ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x
It turns out that the converse is true and will be very useful to us.
Theorem. Consider the function f (z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) defined on a region A. If u
and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations and have continuous partials then f (z) is
differentiable on A.
The proof of this is a tricky exercise in analysis. It is somewhat beyond the scope of this
class, so we will skip it. If you’re interested, with a little effort you should be able to grasp
it.

-------->Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations:-

The Cauchy-Riemann equations provide us with a direct way of checking that a function is
differentiable and computing its derivative.
Example :- Use the Cauchy-Riemann equations to show that ez is differentiable and
z
its derivative is e .
Solution: We write ez = ex+iy = ex cos(y) + iex sin(y). So

u(x, y) = ex cos(y) and v(x, y) = ex sin(y).

Computing partial derivatives we have

ux = ex cos(y), uy = −ex sin(y)

vx = ex sin(y), vy = ex cos(y)

We see that ux = vy and uy = −vx , so the Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied. Thus,
ez is differentiable and
d z
e = ux + ivx = ex cos(y) + iex sin(y) = ez .
dz
Example :- Use the Cauchy-Riemann equations to show that f (z) = z is not differen-
tiable.
Solution: f (x + iy) = x − iy, so u(x, y) = x, v(x, y) = −y. Taking partial derivatives

ux = 1, uy = 0, vx = 0, vy = −1

Since ux 6= vy the Cauchy-Riemann equations are not satisfied and therefore f is not
differentiable.
Theorem. If f (z) is differentiable on a disk and f 0 (z) = 0 on the disk then f (z) is constant.
Proof. Since f is differentiable and f 0 (z) ≡ 0, the Cauchy-Riemann equations show that

ux (x, y) = uy (x, y) = vx (x, y) = vy (x, y) = 0

We know from multivariable calculus that a function of (x, y) with both partials identically
zero is constant. Thus u and v are constant, and therefore so is f .

-------->f 0 (z) as a 2 × 2 matrix:-

Recall that we could represent a complex number a + ib as a 2 × 2 matrix

 
a −b
a + ib ↔ .
b a

Now if we write f (z) in terms of (x, y) we have

f (z) = f (x + iy) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) ↔ f (x, y) = (u(x, y), v(x, y)).

We have
f 0 (z) = ux + ivx ,
so we can represent f 0 (z) as  
ux −vx
.
vx ux
Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations we can replace −vx by uy and ux by vy which gives
us the representation  
0 ux uy
f (z) ↔ ,
vx vy
i.e, f 0 (z) is just the Jacobian of f (x, y).
For me, it is easier to remember the Jacobian than the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Since
f 0 (z) is a complex number I can use the matrix representation in Equation 1 to remember
the Cauchy-Riemann equations!

------->Cauchy-Riemann all the way down:-

We’ve defined an analytic function as one having a complex derivative. The following
theorem shows that if f is analytic then so is f 0 . Thus, there are derivatives all the way
down!
Theorem :- Assume the second order partials of u and v exist and are continuous. If
f (z) = u + iv is analytic, then so is f 0 (z).
Proof. To show this we have to prove that f 0 (z) satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations.
If f = u + iv we know

ux = vy , uy = −vx , f 0 = ux + ivx .

Let’s write
f 0 = U + iV,
so, by Cauchy-Riemann,
U = ux = vy , V = vx = −uy .
We want to show that Ux = Vy and Uy = −Vx . We do them one at a time.
To prove Ux = Vy , we use Equation ?? to see that

Ux = vyx and Vy = vxy .

Since vxy = vyx , we have Ux = Vy .

Similarly, to show Uy = −Vx , we compute

Uy = uxy and Vx = −uyx .

So, Uy = −Vx . QED.

Technical point. We’ve assumed as many partials as we need. So far we can’t guarantee
that all the partials exist. Soon we will have a theorem which says that an analytic function
has derivatives of all order. We’ll just assume that for now. In any case, in most examples
this will be obvious.

------->Gallery of functions:-

In this section we’ll look at many of the functions you know and love as functions of z. For
each one we’ll have to do three things.
 1. Define how to compute it.

2. Specify a branch (if necessary) giving its range.

3. Specify a domain (with branch cut if necessary) where it is analytic.

4. Compute its derivative.

Most often, we can compute the derivatives of a function using the algebraic rules like the
quotient rule. If necessary we can use the Cauchy-Riemann equations or, as a last resort,
even the definition of the derivative as a limit.
Before we start on the gallery we define the term “entire function”.
Definition. A function that is analytic at every point in the complex plane is called an
entire function. We will see that ez , z n , sin(z) are all entire functions.

--------->Gallery of functions, derivatives and properties:-

The following is a concise list of a number of functions and their complex derivatives. None
of the derivatives will surprise you. We also give important properties for some of the
functions. The proofs for each follow below.

1. f (z) = ez = ex cos(y) + iex sin(y).

Domain = all of C (f is entire).
f 0 (z) = ez .

2. f (z) ≡ c (constant)
Domain = all of C (f is entire).
f 0 (z) = 0.

3. f (z) = z n (n an integer ≥ 0)
Domain = all of C (f is entire).
f 0 (z) = nz n−1 .

4. P (z) (polynomial)
A polynomial has the form P (z) = an z n + an−1 z n−1 + . . . + a0 .
Domain = all of C (P (z) is entire).
P 0 (z) = nan z n−1 + (n − 1)an−1 z n−1 + . . . + 2a2 z + a1 .

5. f (z) = 1/z
Domain = C − {0} (the punctured plane).
f 0 (z) = −1/z 2 .

6. f (z) = P (z)/Q(z) (rational function).

When P and Q are polynomials P (z)/Q(z) is called a rational function.
 If we assume that P and Q have no common roots, then:
Domain = C − {roots of Q}
P 0 Q − P Q0
f 0 (z) = .
Q2
7. sin(z), cos(z)
eiz + e−iz eiz − e−iz
Definition. cos(z) = , sin(z) =
2 2i
(By Euler’s formula we know this is consistent with cos(x) and sin(x) when z = x is
real.)
Domain: these functions are entire.
d cos(z) d sin(z)
= − sin(z), = cos(z).
dz dz

Other key properties of sin and cos:

- cos2 (z) + sin2 (z) = 1

- ez = cos(z) + i sin(z)
- Periodic in x with period 2π, e.g. sin(x + 2π + iy) = sin(x + iy).
- They are not bounded!
- In the form f (z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) we have

cos(z) = cos(x) cosh(y) − i sin(x) sinh(y)

sin(z) = sin(x) cosh(y) + i cos(x) sinh(y)

(cosh and sinh are defined below.)

- The zeros of sin(z) are z = nπ for n any integer.
The zeros of cos(z) are z = π/2 + nπ for n any integer.
(That is, they have only real zeros that you learned about in your trig. class.)

8. Other trig functions cot(z), sec(z) etc.

Definition. The same as for the real versions of these function, e.g. cot(z) =
cos(z)/ sin(z), sec(z) = 1/ cos(z).
Domain: The entire plane minus the zeros of the denominator.
Derivative: Compute using the quotient rule, e.g.

cos(z) cos(z) − sin(z)(− sin(z))

 
d tan(z) d sin(z) 1
= = = = sec2 z
dz dz cos(z) cos2 (z) cos2 (z)

(No surprises there!)

9. sinh(z), cosh(z) (hyperbolic sine and cosine)

Definition.
ez + e−z ez − e−z
cosh(z) = , sinh(z) =
2 2
 Domain: these functions are entire.
d cosh(z) d sinh(z)
= sinh(z), = cosh(z)
dz dz
Other key properties of cosh and sinh:

- cosh2 (z) − sinh2 (z) = 1

- For real x, cosh(x) is real and positive, sinh(x) is real.
- cosh(iz) = cos(z), sinh(z) = −i sin(iz).

10. log(z) (See Topic 1.)

Definition. log(z) = log(|z|) + i arg(z).
Branch: Any branch of arg(z).
Domain: C minus a branch cut where the chosen branch of arg(z) is discontinuous.

d 1
log(z) =
dz z

11. z a (any complex a) (See Topic 1.)

Definition. z a = ea log(z) .
Branch: Any branch of log(z).
Domain: Generally the domain is C minus a branch cut of log. If a is an integer ≥ 0
then z a is entire. If a is a negative integer then z a is defined and analytic on C − {0}.

dz a
= az a−1 .
dz

12. sin−1 (z)

√
Definition. sin−1 (z) = −i log(iz + 1 − z 2 ).
The definition is chosen so that sin(sin−1 (z)) = z. The derivation of the formula is as
follows. Let w = sin−1 (z), so z = sin(w). Then,

eiw − e−iw
z= ⇒ e2iw − 2izeiw − 1 = 0
2i
Solving the quadratic in eiw gives
√
iw 2iz + −4z 2 + 4 p
e = = iz + 1 − z 2 .
2
Taking the log gives
p p
iw = log(iz + 1 − z 2 ) ⇔ w = −i log(iz + 1 − z 2 ).

From the definition we can compute the derivative:

d 1
sin−1 (z) = √ .
dz 1 − z2
 Choosing a branch is tricky because both the square root and the log require choices.
We will look at this more carefully in the future.
For now, the following discussion and figure are for your amusement.
Sine (likewise cosine) is not a 1-1 function, so if we want sin−1 (z) to be single-valued
then we have to choose a region where sin(z) is 1-1. (This will be a branch of sin−1 (z),
i.e. a range for the image,) The figure below shows a domain where sin(z) is 1-1. The
domain consists of the vertical strip z = x + iy with −π/2 < x < π/2 together with
the two rays on boundary where y ≥ 0 (shown as red lines). The figure indicates how
the regions making up the domain in the z-plane are mapped to the quadrants in the
w-plane.

A domain where z 7→ w = sin(z) is one-to-one

------>A few proofs:-

Here we prove at least some of the facts stated in the list just above.

1. f (z) = ez . This was done in Example 2.11 using the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

2. f (z) ≡ c (constant). This case is trivial.

3. f (z) = z n (n an integer ≥ 0): show f 0 (z) = nz n−1

It’s probably easiest to use the definition of derivative directly. Before doing that we
note the factorization

z n − z0n = (z − z0 )(z n−1 + z n−2 z0 + z n−3 z02 + . . . + z 2 z0n−3 + zz0n−2 + z0n−1 )

Now
f (z) − f (z0 ) z n − z0n
f 0 (z0 ) = lim = lim
z→z0 z − z0 z→z0 z − z0

= lim (z n−1
+z n−2
z0 + z n−3 z02 + . . . + z 2 z0n−3 + zz0n−2 + z0n−1 )
z→z0
= nz0n−1 .

Since we showed directly that the derivative exists for all z, the function must be
entire.
 4. P (z) (polynomial). Since a polynomial is a sum of monomials, the formula for the
derivative follows from the derivative rule for sums and the case f (z) = z n . Likewise
the fact the P (z) is entire.
5. f (z) = 1/z. This follows from the quotient rule.
6. f (z) = P (z)/Q(z). This also follows from the quotient rule.
7. sin(z), cos(z). All the facts about sin(z) and cos(z) follow from their definition in
terms of exponentials.
8. Other trig functions cot(z), sec(z) etc. Since these are all defined in terms of cos and
sin, all the facts about these functions follow from the derivative rules.
9. sinh(z), cosh(z). All the facts about sinh(z) and cosh(z) follow from their definition
in terms of exponentials.
10. log(z). The derivative of log(z) can be found by differentiating the relation elog(z) = z
using the chain rule. Let w = log(z), so ew = z and
d w dz dew dw dw dw 1
e = =1 ⇒ =1 ⇒ ew =1 ⇒ = w
dz dz dw dz dz dz e
Using w = log(z) we get
d log(z) 1
= .
dz z
11. z a (any complex a). The derivative for this follows from the formula
dz a a az a
z a = ea log(z) ⇒ = ea log(z) · = = az a−1
dz z z

------>Branch cuts and function composition:-

We often compose functions, i.e. f (g(z)). In general in this case we have the chain rule to
compute the derivative. However we need to specify the domain for z where the function is
analytic. And when branches and branch cuts are involved we need to take care.
2 2
Example :- Let f (z) = ez . Since ez and z 2 are both entire functions, so is f (z) = ez .
The chain rule gives us
2
f 0 (z) = ez (2z).

Example :- Let f (z) = ez and g(z) = 1/z. f (z) is entire and g(z) is analytic everywhere
but 0. So f (g(z)) is analytic except at 0 and
df (g(z)) −1
= f 0 (g(z))g 0 (z) = e1/z · 2 .
dz z

Example :- Let h(z) = 1/(ez − 1). Clearly h is entire except where the denominator is
0. The denominator is 0 when ez − 1 = 0. That is, when z = 2πni for any integer n. Thus,
h(z) is analytic on the set
C − {2πni, where n is any integer}
The quotient rule gives h0 (z) = −ez /(ez − 1)2 . A little more formally: h(z) = f (g(z)).
where f (w) = 1/w and w = g(z) = ez − 1. We know that g(z) is entire and f (w) is analytic
everywhere except w = 0. Therefore, f (g(z)) is analytic everywhere except where g(z) = 0.
Example :- It can happen that the derivative has a larger domain where it is analytic
than the original function. The main example is f (z) = log(z). This is analytic on C minus
a branch cut. However
d 1
log(z) =
dz z
is analytic on C − {0}. The converse can’t happen.
√
Example :- Define a region where 1 − z is analytic.
√
Solution: Choosing the principal branch of argument, we have w is analytic on
C − {x ≤ 0, y = 0}, (see figure below.).
√
So 1 − z is analytic except where w = 1 − z is on the branch cut, i.e. where w = 1 − z is
real and ≤ 0. It’s easy to see that
w = 1 − z is real and ≤ 0 ⇔ z is real and ≥ 1.
√
So 1 − z is analytic on the region (see figure below)
C − {x ≥ 1, y = 0}
√ √
Note. A different branch choice for w would lead to a different region where 1 − z is
analytic.
The figure below shows the domains with branch cuts for this example.
Im(w) Im(z)

Re(w) Re(z)
1

√ √
domain for w domain for 1−z
√
Example :- Define a region where f (z) = 1 + ez is analytic.
√
Solution: Again, let’s take w to be analytic on the region
C − {x ≤ 0, y = 0}
So, f (z) is analytic except where 1 + ez is real and ≤ 0. That is, except where ez is real
and ≤ −1. Now, ez = ex eiy is real only when y is a multiple of π. It is negative only when
y is an odd mutltiple of π. It has magnitude greater than 1 only when x > 0. Therefore
f (z) is analytic on the region
C − {x ≥ 0, y = odd multiple of π}
The figure below shows the domains with branch cuts for this example.
Im(w) Im(z)

3πi

πi
Re(w) Re(z)
−πi

−3πi

√ √
domain for w domain for ez + 1

------->Appendix: Limits:-

The intuitive idea behind limits is relatively simple. Still, in the 19th century mathemati-
cians were troubled by the lack of rigor, so they set about putting limits and analysis on
a firm footing with careful definitions and proofs. In this appendix we give you the formal
definition and connect it to the intuitive idea. In 18.04 we will not need this level of for-
mality. Still, it’s nice to know the foundations are solid, and some students may find this
interesting.

-------->Limits of sequences:-

Intuitively, we say a sequence of complex numbers z1 , z2 , . . . converges to a if for large n, zn

is really close to a. To be a little more precise, if we put a small circle of radius  around a
then eventually the sequence should stay inside the circle. Let’s refer to this as the sequence
being captured by the circle. This has to be true for any circle no matter how small, though
it may take longer for the sequence to be ‘captured’ by a smaller circle.
This is illustrated in the figure below. The sequence is strung along the curve shown heading
towards a. The bigger circle of radius 2 captures the sequence by the time n = 47, the
smaller circle doesn’t capture it till n = 59. Note that z25 is inside the larger circle, but
since later points are outside the circle we don’t say the sequence is captured at n = 25
 A sequence of points converging to a
Definition. The sequence z1 , z2 , z3 , . . . converges to the value a if for every  > 0 there is
a number N such that |zn − a| <  for all n > N . We write this as
lim zn = a.
n→∞

Again, the definition just says that eventually the sequence is within  of a, no matter how
small you choose .
Example 2.20. Show that the sequence zn = (1/n + i)2 has limit -1.
Solution: This is clear because 1/n → 0. For practice, let’s phrase it in terms of epsilons:
given  > 0 we have to choose N such that
|zn − (−1)| <  for all n > N
One strategy is to look at |zn + 1| and see what N should be. We have
 2   
 1  1 2i  1 2
|zn − (−1)| =  + i + 1 =  2 +  < 2 +
  
 n  n n n n

So all we have to do is pick N large enough that

1 2
+ <
N2 N
Since this can clearly be done we have proved that zn → i.
This was clearly more work than we want to do for every limit. Fortunately, most of the
time we can apply general rules to determine a limit without resorting to epsilons!
Remarks.

1. In 18.04 we will be able to spot the limit of most concrete examples of sequences. The
formal definition is needed when dealing abstractly with sequences.
2. To mathematicians  is one of the go-to symbols for a small number. The prominent
and rather eccentric mathematician Paul Erdos used to refer to children as epsilons,
as in ‘How are the epsilons doing?’
3. The term ‘captured by the circle’ is not in common usage, but it does capture what
is happening.
 lim f (z)
z→z0

Sometimes we need limits of the form lim f (z) = a. Again, the intuitive meaning is clear:
z→z0
as z gets close to z0 we should see f (z) get close to a. Here is the technical definition
Definition. Suppose f (z) is defined on a punctured disk 0 < |z − z0 | < r around z0 . We
say lim f (z) = a if for every  > 0 there is a δ such that
z→z0

|f (z) − a| <  whenever 0 < |z − z0 | < δ

This says exactly that as z gets closer (within δ) to z0 we have f (z) is close (within ) to a.
Since  can be made as small as we want, f (z) must go to a.
Remarks.

1. Using the punctured disk (also called a deleted neighborhood) means that f (z) does
not have to be defined at z0 and, if it is then f (z0 ) does not necessarily equal a. If
f (z0 ) = a then we say the f is continuous at z0 .

2. Ask any mathematician to complete the phrase “For every ” and the odds are that
they will respond “there is a δ . . . ”

-------->Connection between limits of sequences and limits of functions:-

Here’s an equivalent way to define limits of functions: the limit lim f (z) = a if, for every
z→z0
sequence of points {zn } with limit z0 the sequence {f (zn )} has limit a.