0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views8 pages

Rhamnous

The document describes the ancient Greek city of Rhamnous in Attica. It was best known for its sanctuary of Nemesis, the goddess of divine retribution. The site contains the remains of two temples, a smaller one from the 6th century BC and a larger one from the 5th century BC, both dedicated to Nemesis.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views8 pages

Rhamnous

The document describes the ancient Greek city of Rhamnous in Attica. It was best known for its sanctuary of Nemesis, the goddess of divine retribution. The site contains the remains of two temples, a smaller one from the 6th century BC and a larger one from the 5th century BC, both dedicated to Nemesis.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 8

Coordinates: 38°13′24″N 24°1′38″E

Rhamnous
Rhamnous (Greek: Ῥαμνοῦς), also Ramnous or Rhamnus, was
an ancient Greek city in Attica situated on the coast, overlooking Rhamnous
the Euboean Strait. Its impressive ruins lie northwest of the Ραμνούς
modern town of Agia Marina in the municipality of Marathon.

The site was best known in antiquity for its sanctuary of


Nemesis,[1] the implacable avenging goddess, her most important
in ancient Greece.

Rhamnous is the best-preserved Attic deme site. It was


strategically significant on the sea routes and was fortified with
an Athenian garrison of ephebes (young men). A fortified View of the site of Rhamnous with
acropolis dominates the two small harbours located on either side Euboea in the background
of it which have silted up extensively since antiquity, and into
which grain was imported for Athens during the Peloponnesian
War.

Contents
History
Monuments
The sanctuary of Nemesis
Small Temple
Large Temple Shown within Greece

Statue of Nemesis Alternative name Ramnous,


Roman Period Rhamnus
Rhamnous deme site Location Agia Marina, Attica,
Greece
Images
Region Attica
See also
Coordinates 38°13′24″N
Notes
24°1′38″E
References
Type Settlement
External links
History
Periods Hellenistic
History Satellite of Athens
Site notes
Rhamnus or Rhamnous (Ancient Greek: Ῥαμνοῦς) or
Rhamnuntus or Rhamnountos (Ῥαμνοῦντος) was a deme of Condition Ruined
ancient Attica, belonging to the tribe Aeantis.[2][3] It derived its Ownership Public
name from a thick prickly shrub, which still grows upon the site.
Management 2nd Ephorate of
The town stood upon the eastern coast of Attica, at the distance
Prehistoric and
of 60 stadia from Marathon, and upon the road leading from the
Classical Antiquities
latter town to Oropus.[1] It is described in the Periplus of Pseudo- Public access Yes
Scylax as a fortified place;[4] and it appears from a decree in Website Ramnous (http://ody
Demosthenes[5] to have been regarded as one of the chief
sseus.culture.gr/h/3/
fortresses in Attica. It was still in existence in the time of Pliny
eh351.jsp?obj_id=2
the Elder.[6]
391)
Rhamnus was the birthplace of the orator Antiphon; but
it was chiefly celebrated in antiquity on account of its
worship of Nemesis, who was hence called by the Latin
poets Rhamnsusia virgo and Rhamnsssia dea.[7] The
temple of the goddess was at a short distance from the
town.[1] It contained a celebrated statue of Nemesis,
which, according to Pausanias, was the work of
Pheidias, and was made by him out of a block of Parian
marble, which the Persians had brought with them for
the construction of a trophy. The statue was of colossal
size, 10 cubits in height,[8] and on its basis were several
figures in relief. Other writers say that the statue was the
work of Agoracritus of Paros, a disciple of
Pheidias.[9][10] It was however a common opinion that
Pheidias was the real author of the statue, but that he
gave up the honour of the work to his favourite
disciple.[11]

Rhamnus stood in a small plain, 3 miles (5 km) in


length, which, like that of Marathon, was shut out from
the rest of Attica by surrounding mountains. The town
itself was situated upon a rocky peninsula, surrounded
by the sea for two-thirds of its circumference, and
connected by a narrow ridge with the mountains, which Map of Rhamnous
closely approach it on the land side.

It was about half a mile in circuit, and its remains are considerable. The principal gate was situated upon the
narrow ridge already mentioned, and is still preserved; and adjoining it is the southern wall, about 20 feet
(6.1 m) in height. At the head of a narrow glen, which leads to the principal gate, stand the ruins of the
temple of Nemesis upon a large artificial platform, supported by a wall of pure white marble. But we find
upon this platform, which formed the temenos (τέμενος) or sacred enclosure, the remains of two temples,
which are almost contiguous, and nearly though not quite parallel to each other. The larger building was a
peripteral hexastyle, 71 feet (22 m) long and 33 feet (10 m) broad, with 12 columns on the side, and with a
pronaus, cella, and posticum in the usual manner. The smaller temple was 31 feet (9.4 m) feet long by 21
feet (6.4 m) feet broad, and consisted only of a cella, with a portico containing two Doric columns in antis.
Among the ruins of the larger temple are some fragments of a colossal statue, corresponding in size with that
of the Rhamnusian Nemesis; but these fragments were made of Attic marble, and not of Parian stone as
stated by Pausanias. It is, however, not improbable, as William Martin Leake, who visited the site in the
early 19th century, has remarked, that the story of the block of stone brought by the Persians was a fable, or
an invention of the priests of Nemesis by which Pausanias was deceived. Among the ruins of the smaller
temple was found a fragment, wanting the head and shoulders, of a statue of the human size in the archaic
style of the Aeginetan school. This statue is now in the British Museum. Judging from this statue, as well as
from the diminutive size and ruder architecture of the smaller temple, the latter appears to have been the
more ancient of the two. Hence it has been inferred that the smaller temple was anterior to the Greco-Persian
War, and was destroyed by the Persians just before the Battle of Marathon; and that the larger temple was
erected in honour of the goddess, who had taken vengeance upon the insolence of the barbarians for
outraging her worship. In front of the smaller temple are two chairs (θρόνοι) of white marble, upon one of
which is the inscription Νεμέσει Σώστρατος ἀνέθηκεν, and upon the other (Θέμιδι Σώστρατος ἀνέθηκεν,
which has led some to suppose that the smaller temple was dedicated to Themis. But it is more probable that
both temples were dedicated to Nemesis, and that the smaller temple was in ruins before the larger was
erected. A difficulty, however, arises about the time of the destruction of the smaller temple, from the fact
that the forms of the letters and the long vowels in the inscriptions upon the chairs clearly show that those
inscriptions belong to an era long subsequent to the battle of Marathon. Christopher Wordsworth considered
it ridiculous to suppose that these chairs were dedicated in this temple after its destruction, and hence
conjectures that the temple was destroyed towards the close of the Peloponnesian War by the Persian allies
of Sparta.[12]

Monuments
Understanding of the history of Rhamnous was greatly improved by the work of Jean Pouilloux,[13] who
studied the fortress and the inscriptions from the site.

The sanctuary of Nemesis

The sanctuary of Nemesis lies on the road between Rhamnous and


Marathon, around 630m south of the later city.

Two temples to Nemesis and Themis can be seen at the site situated
very close together.

In modern times, John Peter Gandy's[14] admirable work to


document the site was the first in 1813. As a pioneer in a discipline
then in its infancy, Gandy recorded in his notes and drawings much View of the 5th BC (L) and Archaic
information which would otherwise be lost, since the temples in the (R) temples looking east.
sanctuary were much better preserved then.

Small Temple

The earliest temple dates from the late 6th century BC, made of Poros stone and known from a few
Laconian roof tiles, which was probably destroyed by the Persians in 480-479 BC.

In the early 5th BC the small temple (6.15 by 9.9m) of a 6 × 12 Doric order was built over the earlier
remains to both the goddesses Themis and Nemesis, indicated by dedicatory inscriptions on two marble
seats of the 4th century BC that were sited on the porch. The former was the personification of Right Order
and the latter the avenger of Order's transgressors.

There are several cuttings on the steps of this temple for the insertion of stelai. The temple was built of local
dark marble and roofed with terracotta tiles. The walls of the cella and the terrace of the sanctuary platform
are built in the Lesbian polygonal style of masonry. This temple probably served later as a treasury of the
large temple for its cult statues.

A statue of Themis and several other dedications, unearthed in the cella, are at the National Archaeological
Museum, Athens.

This structure survived until the 4th century AD.


Large Temple

Construction of the larger temple to Nemesis[15] began around 460-450 BC and


continued until 430–420. It was built as a Doric peripteral temple during the
reign of Pericles when the Parthenon was built in Athens, and on a platform
with a massive polygonal terrace wall. It is believed that it was designed by the
architect Callicrates who designed the Temple of Hephaestus in Athens, the
Poseidon Temple at Cape Sounion and the Ares temple in Acharnes.

The euthynteria and lowest level of the crepidoma were made from local dark
marble, while the rest was constructed of white marble.

The Peloponnesian War must have interrupted the completion from 431 BC and
carving of the column flutes was not done and the stylobate blocks were left
unfinished, retaining the protective excess marble on their easily damaged
corners and upper surfaces. There were no pedimental sculptures, nor were the
metopes decorated with sculpture. The roof was decorated with sculptural Themis of Rhamnous,
acroteria, however. Athens Museum

At some point after the original construction, the Temple of Nemesis was
severely damaged at its eastern end and the upper courses were subsequently
repaired with new blocks. The damage to this and other temples in the region
and the destruction of monuments in Athens is thought to be caused by the
armies of Philip V of Macedon during his raids in 200 BC. The blocks which
were used to repair the Temple of Nemesis are distinct from the original blocks
and the tooling is quite different which suggests that the repairs were made in
the Roman period, when interest in the old Classical temples was renewed. The
central block of the architrave on the east end of the temple bears an inscription
of rededication to the goddess Livia by the Demos, which may be associated Peripteros Plan
with the repairs. This reconstruction must have been costly since it involved
replacing the east end, which required making duplicate blocks for
the frieze, geison, perhaps the tympanon, the raking geison, the
akroteria, and perhaps part of the sima, rooftiles, and ceiling coffers.
Unlike other temples in Attica which had fallen into disrepair, the
Temple of Nemesis was not stripped of useful parts or removed
whole to Athens. Instead, it was restored with pride as an important
local monument.

Statue of Nemesis
Unfinished fluting and carving on the
5th century BC temple.
The cella of the large temple housed the cult figure of Nemesis,
sculpted by Agorakritos, a pupil of Phidias, from the block of Parian
marble alleged to have been brought by the overconfident Persians
for their triumphal stele.[1] This famous statue[16] of the goddess stood within the cella of the temple and
was around 4m high. The Roman historian and connoisseur Varro rated it the finest example of Greek
sculpture.

The badly damaged remains of an over life-size marble head from a cult statue of Nemesis, with
perforations for attaching a gold crown, was discovered by the British architect John Gandy in the early
nineteenth century and is now part of the British Museum's collection.[17] This has a stylistic similarity to
the pediment sculptures of the Parthenon of 440-432 BC.
Many parts of the original statue have been recovered and reconstructed[18][19]
from the hundreds of fragments found scattered about after the destruction of
the cult image by early Christians, and this allowed the identification of a total
of eleven Roman copies on a smaller scale. The base of the statue,
approximately 90 cm high and 240 cm wide, has also been reconstructed; on
three sides of the base, the nearly-in-the-round scene shows the presentation of
Helen to her mother Nemesis by Leda.[20]

Roman Period

In the Roman period c. 46 AD, dedications were made at the sanctuary to the
deified Livia, the wife of Augustus, and to the emperor Claudius. In the 2nd
century AD, Herodes Atticus made dedications of busts of the emperors Nemesis statue, Roman
Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus as well as a statue of his pupil Polydeucion. copy, Prague Kinsky
The cult of Nemesis at Rhamnous came to a formal end with the decree of the
Byzantine emperor Arcadius in 382 AD that ordered the destruction of any
surviving polytheist temples in the countryside.[21]

Rhamnous deme site

The fortified acropolis of Rhamnous occupying a c. 28m high hill of


area approximately 230 by 270m. The fortification walls were
constructed of the local marble from Agia Marina. There were also
significant numbers of buildings outside the walls of the fortified
area.

Many grave monuments have been recovered from burials along the
road between Rhamnous and Marathon.
Southern gate of the fortified site.

Images
Temple of Nemesis Temple of Nemesis General view of Closer view
Rhamnous

Main path

See also
National Archaeological Museum of Athens

Notes
1. Pausanias. Description of Greece (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=paus.+1.33.2
&redirect=true). 1.33.2.
2. Stephanus of Byzantium. Ethnica. s.v.
3. Harpocr., Suid., s. v.
4. Periplus of Pseudo-Scylax, p. 21.
5. Demosthenes, pro Cor. p. 238, ed Reiske.
6. "Rhamnus pagus, locus Marathon," Pliny. Naturalis Historia. 4.7.11.
7. Catull. 66.71; Claud. B. Get. 631; Ovid Met. 3.406, Trist. 5.8.9; Stat. Silv. 3.5.5.
8. Hesych. sub voce; Zenob. Prov. 5.82.
9. Strabo. Geographica. ix. p.396. Page numbers refer to those of Isaac Casaubon's edition.
10. Pliny. Naturalis Historia. 36.5.4-17.
11. Suid. s.v. Zenob. Prov. 5.82; Tzetz. Child. 7.960.
12. William Martin Leake, Demi of Attica, p. 105, et seq., 2nd ed.; Northern Greece, vol. ii. p. 434,
et seq.; Christopher Wordsworth, Athens and Attica, p. 34, et seq.; Unedited Antiquities of
Attica, c. vi. p. 41, et seq.
13. Jean Pouilloux, La Forteresse de Rhamnonte : étude de topographie et d'histoire, Bibliothèque
des Écoles françaises d'Athènes et de Rome, de Boccard, Paris, 1954.
14. "The Unedited Antiquities of Attica", London 1817, and Antiquities of Ionia, Part V (Suppl. to
Part III), W. R. Lethaby,ed., London 1915
15. "Reconstruction of the Temple of Nemesis at Rhamnous", M. Miles, American School of
Classical Studies at Athens, Hesperia Vol. 58, No. 2, https://www.jstor.org/stable/148334
16. Pliny's Natural History Pliny 36.17.
17. British Museum Collection (https://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collectio
n_object_details.aspx?objectId=444386&partId=1&place=34253&plaA=34253-3-1&page=1)
18. "Nemesis" Penn Museum, Expedition Magazine 15.1 (September 1972)
<http://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/?
p=2380>http://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/nemesis/
19. Despinis, G. "Discovery of the Scattered Fragments and Recognition of the Type of
Agorakritos' Statue of Nemesis." AAA 3 (1970), 403-414.
20. Lapatin, K.D.S. "The Reconstruction of the Temple at Rhamnous? Who is who on the Nemesis
Base?", The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Hesperia 61
(1992), 107-119, https://www.jstor.org/stable/148185
21. Si qua in agris templa sunt, sine turba ac tumultu diruantur. His enim deiectis atque sublatis
omnis superstitioni materia consumetur., Codex Theodosianus,Liber XVI,X.16 (https://la.wikiso
urce.org/wiki/Codex_Theodosianus/Liber_XVI#X.16)

This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Smith, William, ed. (1854–
1857). "Rhamnus". Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography. London: John Murray.

References
Despinis, G. "Discovery of the Scattered Fragments and Recognition of the Type of
Agorakritos' Statue of Nemesis." AAA 3 (1970), 403–414.
Dinsmoor, W.B. Jr. "Rhamnountine Fantasies," Hesperia 30 (1961), 179–204.
Edwards, C.M. "Tyche at Corinth," Hesperia 61 (1990), 529–542.
Hodge, A.T. and R.A. Tomlinson. "Some Notes on the Temple of Nemesis at Rhamnous," AJA
73 (1969), 162–185.
Karusu, S. "Ein Akroter klassischer Zeit" AthMitt 77 (1962), 178–190.
Langlotz, E. "Eine Metope des Nemesistempel in Rhamnus" in Scritti in onore di Bartolomeo
Nogara. Vatican City, 1937, 225–230.
Lapatin, K.D.S. "The Reconstruction of the Temple at Rhamnous? Who is who on the Nemesis
Base?" Hesperia 61 (1992), 107–119.
Leake, William Martin. Travels in the Morea vol. II (London 1830) (https://web.archive.org/web/
20091027091524/http://geocities.com/classicalbackpacking/leakerhamnous.html)
Miles, M.M. "The Reconstruction of the Temple of Nemesis at Rhamnous", Hesperia 58 (1989),
134-256. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/148334)
Oetjen, R., Athen im dritten Jahrhundert v. Chr. Politik und Gesellschaft in den
Garnisonsdemen auf der Grundlage der inschriftlichen Überlieferung, Duisburg 2014.
Petrakos, V. Rhamnous. Athens, 1991.
Stillwell, Richard, ed. Princeton Encyclopedia of Classical Sites, 1976: (http://www.perseus.tuft
s.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0006:entry=rhamnous) "Rhamnous, Attica
Greece"
Thompson, H.A. "Athens Faces Adversity." Hesperia 50 (1981), 346–348.
Travlos, J. Bildlexikon zur Topographie des antiken Attika. Tubingin, 1988, 388–403.
de Waele, J.A.K.E. "The Design for the Temple of Nemesis at Rhamnous," in M. Gnade, ed.,
Stips Votive, Papers Presented to C.M. Stibbe. Amsterdam, 1991, 249–264.
Wilhelm, A. "Themis und Nemesis von Rhamnous." OJb 44 (1942), 200–209.

External links
Official website (http://odysseus.culture.gr/h/3/eh351.jsp?obj_id=2391)
Perseus site (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/artifact?name=Rhamnous&object=Site)
ODYSSEUS (Hellenic Ministry of Culture) - Rhamnous (http://odysseus.culture.gr/h/3/gh351.js
p?obj_id=2391)
Classical Backpacking in Greece (https://web.archive.org/web/20091027091311/http://geocitie
s.com/classicalbackpacking/rhamnous.html)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rhamnous&oldid=949431478"

This page was last edited on 6 April 2020, at 12:55 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this
site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

You might also like