Scribd
Upload
215 views5 pages

Correlation Design

The document reports the results of correlation analyses between materialism and life satisfaction (top), and between gratitude and life satisfaction (bottom). For both analyses, there is a weak positive correlation between the variables. The correlation between materialism and life satisfaction is statistically significant, while the correlation between gratitude and life satisfaction is not statistically significant.

Uploaded by

Bernadeth Tenorio
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
215 views5 pages

Correlation Design

The document reports the results of correlation analyses between materialism and life satisfaction (top), and between gratitude and life satisfaction (bottom). For both analyses, there is a weak positive correlation between the variables. The correlation between materialism and life satisfaction is statistically significant, while the correlation between gratitude and life satisfaction is not statistically significant.

Uploaded by

Bernadeth Tenorio
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 5

x- cause; y- effect

x- cause; y- effect
y- criterion ; x- predictor

spearman's rho- ordinal- theres order

kind of relationshi and strength- correlation coefficient


negative- inverse, indirect relationship
curvilinear-

Materialism gratitude lifesatisfaction


-0.75274725275 29 31 spi lifesat
-1.02747252747 35 28 spi 1
-1.63186813187 35 29 lifesat 0.275506777 1
-2.85164835165 40 32
-0.28021978022 29 24 SUMMARY OUTPUT
-1.03296703297 40 27
-0.86813186813 39 27 Regression Statistics
-0.60989010989 30 20 Multiple R 0.275506777 same as correlation coefficient
-1.01098901099 33 22 R Square 0.075903984 effect size of ttest and analysis of
-2.06043956044 41 17 Adjusted R Square 0.066474433
-2.03296703297 41 30 Standard Error 4.454980118
-1.3021978022 35 20 Observations 100
-0.13736263736 28 30
-0.02747252747 29 20 ANOVA
-0.62087912088 34 30 df SS
-2.08791208791 42 26 Regression 1 159.7589105382
-0.10989010989 29 26 Residual 98 1944.9910894618
-2.31868131868 40 26 Total 99 2104.75
-0.9010989011 37 27
-1.05494505495 38 27 Coefficients Standard Error
-0.75274725275 39 29 Intercept 19.08099085 2.1849978952315
-1.55494505495 33 26 spi 0.079541404 0.0280353820783
-2.62087912088 39 26
-1.53846153846 40 24 SEATWORK
-0.15384615385 32 26 GRATITUDE AND LIFE SATISFACTION
-1.23626373626 42 31
-0.28021978022 26 23 gratitude lifesatisfaction
-2.07692307692 36 32 gratitude 1
-0.35164835165 36 28 lifesatisfaction 0.110838697 1
-0.85164835165 25 27
-2.39010989011 37 25 SUMMARY OUTPUT
-0.89010989011 36 20
-2.70879120879 42 24 Regression Statistics
-1.42307692308 40 21 Multiple R 0.110838697
-0.60989010989 30 20 R Square 0.012285217
-1.31868131868 37 22 Adjusted R Square 0.002206494
-1 39 27 Standard Error 4.605777971
-1.49450549451 28 24 Observations 100
-0.5 32 22
-1.92857142857 42 30 ANOVA
-0.7967032967 38 29 df SS
-1.54945054945 36 20 Regression 1 25.857309731333
-0.72527472527 34 24 Residual 98 2078.8926902687
-0.61538461538 42 17 Total 99 2104.75
-1.68131868132 38 29
-0.31318681319 29 24 Coefficients Standard Error
-0.7032967033 17 34 Intercept 21.75745799 3.1071418405754
-0.46153846154 41 29 gratitude 0.09839159 0.08911879511
-0.64285714286 39 24
-0.59340659341 33 30
-1.85714285714 42 25
-1.0989010989 35 16
-0.69230769231 42 26
-1.23626373626 40 19
-1.12637362637 29 25
-1.58241758242 27 24
-0.95604395604 38 30
-0.69230769231 30 29
-1.08241758242 18 24
-0.80769230769 39 21
-2.20879120879 39 28
-0.72527472527 31 14
-0.39010989011 40 23
-1.56593406593 32 28
-1.34065934066 37 28
-0.91758241758 30 26
-1.08241758242 33 22
-1.03846153846 33 20
-1.28021978022 31 23
-0.58241758242 40 31
-1.23626373626 39 25
-1.71428571429 37 20
-0.93956043956 30 13
-0.99450549451 29 23
-1.08241758242 33 26
-0.76923076923 30 25
-0.07142857143 38 25
-2.48901098901 34 25
-1.79120879121 38 29
-0.63186813187 34 21
-0.60989010989 28 22
-0.84615384615 30 27
-0.87362637363 35 18
-0.53846153846 31 22
-1.01098901099 31 30
-0.15934065934 37 29
-1.03846153846 27 19
-0.3021978022 33 28
-0.70879120879 36 31
-0.93956043956 37 33
-0.78021978022 35 33
-0.27472527473 32 26
-0.63736263736 23 21
-0.54395604396 39 25
-0.95604395604 33 10
-0.10989010989 36 25
-0.02747252747 30 31
-0.47802197802 32 24
-1.23626373626 37 31
-0.97802197802 36 30
df= N-2 100-2 =98
s correlation coefficient
ize of ttest and analysis of varian; square of multiple r R(98)=0.28- MULTIPLE R

7.5% FROM RSQUARE decision rule


reject ho if pvalue is greater than .05

MS F Significance F
159.7589 8.049586 0.01 pvalue bivariate multiple r
19.84685

t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
8.732727 0.00 14.74493364 23.417048063 14.74493364 23.417048063
2.837179 0.01 0.023906101 0.1351767076 0.023906101 0.1351767076
MS F Significance F
25.85731 1.218926 0.27
21.21319

t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
7.002403 0.00 15.59143613 27.923479852 15.59143613 27.923479852
1.10405 0.27 -0.07846176 0.275244938 -0.07846176 0.275244938

You might also like