ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALANCES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

0.000 - 1.499 Poor
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding
 Appendix D.1

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III ( Proficient )
Name of Employee: MARIA ALOHA R. DAEL Name of Rater: ROLAND S. CAPALAR, PH.D.
Position: SST I Position: SCHOOL PRINCIPAL II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: AUPAGAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: 8-Apr-19
Rating Period: S.Y. 2018-2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight per Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
Objective Very Satisfactory Results
QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied June 2018 - Quality Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of No acceptable Showed
knowledge of
content and its content and its content and its content and its evidence was
Education Knowledge knowledge of March 2019 integration within and integration within and integration within and integration within and shown
content and its
integration within
Services and across subject areas as across subject areas as across subject areas as across subject areas as and across
content within and shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a subject areas as
Pedagogy across curriculum rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6
(22.5%) teaching areas.
4 3 3.500 0.263
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
lessons using MOV 1 using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and given MOV evidence was
and supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of shown
of the other given MOV the other given MOV the other given MOV

Timeliness

Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 - Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
Education teaching strategies March 2019 strategies that promote strategies that promote strategies that promote strategies that promote shown
Services reading, writing and/or reading, writing and/or reading, writing and/or reading, writing and/or
that enhance numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
learner shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
achievement in rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

literacy and
numeracy skills. 3 3 3.000 0.225
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner - Submitted 2 learner - Submitted 1 learner - No acceptable
learner - centered centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lesson as evidence was
lessons as evidently evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in evidently shown in any shown
shown in MOV 1 and 1 and supported by any MOV 1 and supported of the given MOV
supported by any 1 of 1 of the other MOV by any 1 of the other
the other MOV given given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range Quality Used different teaching
strategies that develop
Used different teaching
strategies that develop
Used different teaching
strategies that develop
Used different teaching No acceptable
strategies that develop evidence was
Education of teaching critical and creative critical and creative critical and creative critical and creative shown
Services thinking and/or other thinking and/or other thinking and/or other thinking and/or other
strategies to HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in
develop critical and MOV 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a rating of 4
creative thinking, 7 5

as well as other
higher - order 4 5 4.500 0.3375
7.5%
thinking skills.
Basic 3. Applied a range
Education of teaching
Services
strategies to
develop critical and Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per Actual
MFOs KRAs creative thinking,
Objectives Timeline Score
Objective Very Satisfactory Results
as well as other QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T Ave
higher - order 4 5 4.500 0.3375
7.5%
thinking skills. Efficiency Submitted at least 4
lessons as evidenced
Submitted 3 lessons as
evidenced by MOV 1
Submitted 2 lessons as Submitted 1 lesson as
evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by any 1 of
No acceptable
evidence was
by MOV 1 and and supported by any 1 and supported by any 1 the other given MOV shown
supported by any 1 of of the other given MOV of the other given MOV
the other given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Environment management strategies management strategies management strategies management strategies evidence was
Education structure to engage that engage learners in that engage learners in that engage learners in that engage learners in shown
Services and Diversity learners, individually or activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
of Learners
in groups, in shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
(22.5%) rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
meaningful
exploration, discovery
and hands-on activities
within a range of 5 5 5.000 0.375
physical learning 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
environments. lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of the evidence was
MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the other and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV shown
the other acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed June 2018 - Quality Applied teacher
management strategies
Applied teacher
management strategies
Applied teacher
management strategies
Applied teacher No acceptable
management strategies evidence was
Education learner behavior March 2019 of learner behavior that of learner behavior that of learner behavior that of learner behavior that shown
Services promote positive and promote positive and promote positive and promote positive and
constructively by non-violent discipline non-violent discipline as non-violent discipline as non-violent discipline as
applying positive as shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
and non-violent submitted with a rating submitted with a rating submitted with a rating submitted with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
discipline to ensure
learning- focused 4 5 4.500 0.3375
environments. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least 4 of Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
the given strategies as the given strategies as the given strategies as given strategies as evidence was
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 lessons observed in 2 lessons observed in only 1 shown
lessons lesson

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used Quality Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated No acceptable
teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to evidence
Education differentiated, address learner address learner address learner address learner shown
Services diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in
developmentally MOV 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a rating of 4
appropriate 7 5
learning
experiences to
address learners’
gender, needs, 4 5 4.500 0.3375
7.5%
strengths, interests
and experiences.
Basic 6. Used
Education differentiated,
Services
developmentally Performance Indicators Rating
appropriate Weight per Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
learning Objective Very Satisfactory Results
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T Ave
experiences to (4)
address learners’ Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
gender, needs, differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching evidence 4 5 4.500 0.3375
7.5% strategies in at least 2 strategies in at least 2 strategies in 2 lessons strategy in only 1 lesson shown
strengths, interests lessons as evidenced lessons as evidenced as evidenced by MOV 1 as evidently shown in
and experiences. by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and and supported by any 1 any 1 of the acceptable
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of of the other acceptable MOV
the other acceptable the other acceptable MOV
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Planned, June 2018 - Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Education Curriculum managed and March 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
Services and sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
implemented and learning process and learning process as and learning process as and learning process as
Planning developmentally Quality
as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
(22.5%) sequenced with a rating of 7 rating 6 rating 5 rating 4

teaching and
learning processes
to meet curriculum
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.3375
7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
requirements and sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown
and learning process and learning process as and learning process as and learning process as
varied teaching as evidently shown in evidently shown in MOV evidently shown in evidently shown in any
contexts. MOV 1 and supported 1 and supported by any MOV 1 and supported 1 of the given MOV
by any 1 of the other 1 of the other given by any 1 of the other
given MOV MOV given MOV

Timeliness

8. Participated in June 2018 - Quality Consistently Frequently participated Occasionally Rarely participated in No acceptable
participated in in LACs/FGDs/ participated in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
collegial March 2019 LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss LACs/FGDs/ meetings meeting to discuss shown
discussions that meetings to discuss teacher/learner to discuss teacher/learner
teacher/learner feedback to enrich teacher/learner feedback to enrich
use teacher and feedback to enrich instruction as shown in feedback to enrich instruction as shown in
learner feedback to instruction as shown in the MOV submitted instruction as shown in the MOV submitted
the MOV submitted feedback as evidenced the MOV as evidenced by the
enrich teaching feedback as evidenced by the MOV submitted submittedfeedback as MOV submitted
by the MOV submitted evidenced by the MOV
practice. submitted

5 5 5.000 0.375
7.5%
Efficiency Participated in at least Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable
4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ evidence was
LACs/FGDs/meetings meetings as evidently meetings as evidently meeting as evidently shown
as evidently shown in shown in any 1 of the shown in any 1 of the shown in any 1 of the
any 1 of the given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
Objective Very Satisfactory Results
QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 9. Selected, Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No acceptable
varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and evidence was
Education developed, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, shown
Services including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
organized and address learning goals address learning goals address learning goals address learning goals
used appropriate Quality as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 with
with a rating of 7 a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 a rating of 4
teaching and
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address learning Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any teaching No acceptable 5 5.000 0.375
goals 7.5% varied teaching and teaching and learning teaching and learning and learning resource, evidence was
learning resources, resources, including resources, including including ICT, as shown
including ICT, as ICT, as evidently shown ICT, as evidently shown evidently shown in any
evidently shown in in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and of the acceptable MOV
MOV 1 and supported supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
by any 1 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness `

Basic 4. 10. Designed, June 2018 - Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable
organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
Education Assessmen selected, March 2019 diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative shown
Services t and and summative and summative and summative and summative
organized and assessment strategies assessment strategies assessment strategies assessment strategies
Reporting used diagnostic, consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
(22.5%) formative and curriculum curriculum requirements curriculum curriculum requirements
requirements as shown as shown in MOV 1 with requirements as shown as shown in MOV 1 with
summative in MOV 1 with a rating a rating of 6 in MOV 1 with a rating a rating of 4
of 7 of 5
assessment
strategies 5 5 5.000 0.375
7.5%
consistent with
curriculum Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable
requirements varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as evidence was
tools as evidently evidently shown in any evidently shown in any evidently shown in any shown
shown in any 1 of the 1 of the acceptable 1 of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently monitored Frequently monitored Occasionally monitored Rarely monitored and No acceptable
and evaluated learner and evaluated learner and evaluated learner evaluated learner evidence was
Education evaluated learner progress and progress and progress and progress and shown
Services achievement using achievement using achievement using achievement using
progress and learner attainment data learner attainment data learner attainment data learner attainment data
achievement using as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV
learner attainment submitted submitted submitted submitted

data.

7.5% Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 acceptable No acceptable 3 5 5 4.333 0.325
combination of at least combination of 3 of the combination of 2 of the MOV evidence was
4 of the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown
MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 evidence was
quarters quarters quarters quarter shown
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
Objective Very Satisfactory Results
QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 12. Communicated June 2018 - Quality Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed prompt No acceptable
prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear and clear evidence was
Education promptly and clearly March 2019 communication of the communication of the communication of the communication of the shown
Services the learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
progress and progress and progress and progress and
progress and achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
achievement to key stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including
stakeholders, parents/ guardians as parents/ guardians as parents/ guardians as parents/ guardians as
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
including submitted submitted submitted submitted
parents/guardians

7.5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.375

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
combination of at least combination of 3 of the combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
4 of the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown
MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 evidence was
quarters quarters quarters quarter shown

Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed various June 2018 - Quality Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed Rarely performed No acceptable
various related various related various related various related evidence was
Education Factor (10%) related works/activities March 2019 work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that shown
Services that contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the contribute
teaching-learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning to the teaching learning
process. process as shown in process as shown in the process as shown in process as shown in the
the MOV submitted MOV submitted the MOV submitted MOV submitted

5 5 5.000 0.500
10%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 different Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable
different kinds of kinds of acceptable kinds of acceptable acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV MOV MOV shown

Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL

ACCOMPLISH- MENTS Outstanding 4.538

ROLAND S. CAPALAR MARIA ALOHA R. DAEL SUSAN A. ENCARGUEZ

PRINCIPAL II Grade 11 - Adviser North Butuan District Supervisor
Rater Ratee Approving Authority