0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views

Mathematics For Economics: Euncheol Shin

This document discusses properties of sequences and their relationship to real numbers. It contains the following key points: 1. Every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence, as shown by the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem. 2. The proof of this theorem relies on two facts: every real sequence has a monotonic subsequence, and every monotonic bounded sequence is convergent. 3. Not every bounded rational sequence contains a monotonic subsequence, nor is every monotonic rational sequence convergent. Therefore, the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem does not hold for rational numbers.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views

Mathematics For Economics: Euncheol Shin

This document discusses properties of sequences and their relationship to real numbers. It contains the following key points: 1. Every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence, as shown by the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem. 2. The proof of this theorem relies on two facts: every real sequence has a monotonic subsequence, and every monotonic bounded sequence is convergent. 3. Not every bounded rational sequence contains a monotonic subsequence, nor is every monotonic rational sequence convergent. Therefore, the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem does not hold for rational numbers.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 29

Mathematics for Economics

Euncheol Shin

Kyung Hee University


eshin.econ@khu.ac.kr

Lecture 5

1 / 15
Recall

Number systems

Real sequences

2 / 15
Outline: Today’s Goal

Proposition
Every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence.

3 / 15
Outline: Today’s Goal

Proposition
Every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence.

Bounded sequence?

Subsequence?

Proof?

Relationships to other properties of R?

3 / 15
Natural Numbers and Integers

Definition
A sequence (xn )∞
n=1 is said to be bounded if it is bounded above and
below.

That is, there is K ∈ R such that |xn | ≤ K for all n ∈ N

[Figures Here]

4 / 15
Result
Proposition
Every convergent real sequence is bounded.

5 / 15
Result
Proposition
Every convergent real sequence is bounded.

Proof.
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be a convergent sequence

Then, there exist x ∈ R and N ∈ N such that

|xn − x| < 1 for all n ≥ N

5 / 15
Result
Proposition
Every convergent real sequence is bounded.

Proof.
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be a convergent sequence

Then, there exist x ∈ R and N ∈ N such that

|xn − x| < 1 for all n ≥ N

This implies that |xn | ≤ |x| + 1 for all n ≥ N (WHY?)

5 / 15
Result
Proposition
Every convergent real sequence is bounded.

Proof.
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be a convergent sequence

Then, there exist x ∈ R and N ∈ N such that

|xn − x| < 1 for all n ≥ N

This implies that |xn | ≤ |x| + 1 for all n ≥ N (WHY?)

Let K = max{|x1 |, |x2 |, . . . , |xN −1 |, |x| + 1}, and the proof is


done (WHY?)
5 / 15
Converse

Is the converse true?

[Illustration Here]

6 / 15
Monotone Sequences

Definition
A sequence (xn )∞
n=1 is said to be increasing if xn ≤ xn+1 for all
n ∈ N. The sequence is said to be strictly increasing if xn < xn+1 for
all n ∈ N.

Dually, we define (strictly) decreasing sequences

A sequence is said to be monotonic if it is increasing or decreasing

7 / 15
Subsequences
Definition
Every increasing sequence bounded above is convergent.

Proof.
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be an increasing sequence bounded above

Then, by the Completeness Axiom, x := sup{x1 , x2 , . . . } exists

8 / 15
Subsequences
Definition
Every increasing sequence bounded above is convergent.

Proof.
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be an increasing sequence bounded above

Then, by the Completeness Axiom, x := sup{x1 , x2 , . . . } exists

A natural condidate of the limit is x!

Let ε > 0 be given. Then, x − ε cannot be an upper bound of


{x1 , x2 , . . . } (WHY?)

8 / 15
Subsequences
Definition
Every increasing sequence bounded above is convergent.

Proof.
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be an increasing sequence bounded above

Then, by the Completeness Axiom, x := sup{x1 , x2 , . . . } exists

A natural condidate of the limit is x!

Let ε > 0 be given. Then, x − ε cannot be an upper bound of


{x1 , x2 , . . . } (WHY?)

Since the sequence is increasing, xn ∈ (x − ε, x] implies that


xm ∈ (x − ε, x] for all m ≥ n. Thus, the proof is done. (WHY?)
8 / 15
Converse

Is the converse true?

[Illustration Here]

9 / 15
Subsequences

Definition
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be a real sequence. A subsequence of the original
sequence is of the form (xnk )∞
k=1 , where nk is a sequence in N such
that m1 < m2 < m3 < . . . .

10 / 15
Subsequences

Definition
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be a real sequence. A subsequence of the original
sequence is of the form (xnk )∞
k=1 , where nk is a sequence in N such
that m1 < m2 < m3 < . . . .

Example:
Let xn = (−1)n be a sequence.

Let nk = 2k.

Then, the sequence (xnk )∞


k=1 is a subsequence of the original
sequence.

10 / 15
Result

Proposition
Every real sequence has a monotonic subsequence.

Proof.
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be given.

11 / 15
Result

Proposition
Every real sequence has a monotonic subsequence.

Proof.
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be given.

Define S1 = {x1 , x2 , x3 , . . . }

11 / 15
Result

Proposition
Every real sequence has a monotonic subsequence.

Proof.
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be given.

Define S1 = {x1 , x2 , x3 , . . . }

Case 1: S1 contains no maximum element.


Then, we can find a strictly increasing subsequence.

11 / 15
Result

Proposition
Every real sequence has a monotonic subsequence.

Proof.
Let (xn )∞
n=1 be given.

Define S1 = {x1 , x2 , x3 , . . . }

Case 1: S1 contains no maximum element.


Then, we can find a strictly increasing subsequence.

Case 2: S1 contains a maximum element.


Sm = {xm , xm+1 , xm+2 , . . . } contains no maximum element for
some m ∈ N.

11 / 15
Result

Proposition
Every real sequence has a monotonic subsequence.

Proof.
Case 3: Sm = {xm , xm+1 , xm+2 , . . . } contains a maximum
element for all m ∈ N.

12 / 15
Result

Proposition
Every real sequence has a monotonic subsequence.

Proof.
Case 3: Sm = {xm , xm+1 , xm+2 , . . . } contains a maximum
element for all m ∈ N.
Let xn1 := max S1 .
Suppose xnk is given. Let xnk+1 := max Snk +1 .
(xnk )∞
k=1 is recuresively defined.

xnk is decreasing. (WHY?)

Therefore, the proposition is proven.

12 / 15
Real Numbers

Axiom (The Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem)


Every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence.

Proof.

13 / 15
Real Numbers

Axiom (The Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem)


Every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence.

Proof.
Every bounded real sequence contains a monotonic subsequence.

13 / 15
Real Numbers

Axiom (The Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem)


Every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence.

Proof.
Every bounded real sequence contains a monotonic subsequence.

The monotonic subsequence is convergent.

13 / 15
Real Numbers

Axiom (The Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem)


Every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence.

Proof.
Every bounded real sequence contains a monotonic subsequence.

The monotonic subsequence is convergent.

Hence, the bounded real sequence contains a convergent


subsequence.

13 / 15
Questions

Does every bounded reational sequence contain a monotonic


subsequence?

Is every monotonic rational sequence convergent?

Conclusion?

14 / 15
Next Week

Continuous functions

15 / 15

You might also like