Simple Misconduct
Simple Misconduct
(https://i.gov.ph/policies/signed/memorandum-circular-govmail-service-policy/annex-3b-
administrative-offenses-sanctions-based-csc-uniform-rules-administrative-cases-civil-service/)
SUBJECT: Policy on Undertime
Pursuant to CSC Resolution No. 10-1357* dated July 6, 2010, the Commission resolves that
undertime is not classified as tardiness. However, due to the inimical effect of undertime to
public service, which cannot be countenanced, the following guidelines on Undertime is hereby
promulgated, as follows:
1. Any officer or employee who incurs undertime, regardless of the number of minutes/hours, ten
(10) times a month for at least two months in a semester shall be liable for Simple Misconduct
and or/Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service, as the case may be; and
2. Any officer or employee who incurs undertime, regardless of the number of minutes/hours, ten
(10) times a month for at least two (2) consecutive months during the year shall be liable for
Simple Misconduct and/or Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service, as the case
may be.
Pursuant to CSC Resolution No. 10-1358* dated July 6, 2010, the Commission resolves to
promulgate the following guidelines on Half Day Absence, as follows:
1. Any officer or employee who is absent in the morning is considered to be tardy and is subject
to provisions on Habitual Tardiness; and
2. Any officer or employee who is absent in the afternoon is considered to have incurred
undertime, subject to the provisions on Undertime.
FIO OMB vs. Castillo, G.R. No. 221848, August 30, 2016
There are two (2) types of misconduct, namely: grave misconduct, with which respondent was
charged, and simple misconduct. In grave misconduct, as distinguished from simple misconduct,
the elements of corruption, clear intent to violate the law, or flagrant disregard of an established
rule must be manifest. Without any of these elements, the transgression of an established rule is
properly characterized merely as simple misconduct.
- Section 11. Penalties. - (a) Any public official or employee, regardless of whether or not he
holds office or employment in a casual, temporary, holdover, permanent or regular capacity,
committing any violation of this Act shall be punished with a fine not exceeding the equivalent
of six (6) months' salary or suspension not exceeding one (1) year, or removal depending on the
gravity of the offense after due notice and hearing by the appropriate body or agency. If the
violation is punishable by a heavier penalty under another law, he shall be prosecuted under the
latter statute. Violations of Sections 7, 8 or 9 of this Act shall be punishable with imprisonment
not exceeding five (5) years, or a fine not exceeding five thousand pesos (P5,000), or both, and,
in the discretion of the court of competent jurisdiction, disqualification to hold public office.
(b) Any violation hereof proven in a proper administrative proceeding shall be sufficient
cause for removal or dismissal of a public official or employee, even if no criminal
prosecution is instituted against him.
(d) The official or employee concerned may bring an action against any person who
obtains or uses a report for any purpose prohibited by Section 8 (D) of this Act. The
Court in which such action is brought may assess against such person a penalty in any
amount not to exceed twenty-five thousand pesos (P25,000). If another sanction
hereunder or under any other law is heavier, the latter shall apply.