Lesson 1: Philosophical and Sociological Perspectives of Education
Lesson 1: Philosophical and Sociological Perspectives of Education
OVERVIEW
COURSE OUTCOME
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Before reading the underpinnings of the lesson, you are encouraged to answer these
questions and revisit them later once you are done with the required reading tasks.
After answering these questions, you are advised to collaborate with two of your
classmates via phone call or social media and share among yourselves your answers.
Write down their names and sharing for every question. Your outputs will be evaluated
1
using these criteria: (1) The relevance of responses to questions – 20 points, (2)
substance- 20 points, and evidence of collaboration – 10 points. For these tasks, the
guide questions are as follows:
Question #1:
First is to improve the quality of education. Second, To Give Back to Your Community. Third, To
Change the Lives of Students. Because becoming a teacher lets you impart life lessons that they
will never forget and puts you in a position to influence their decisions, behaviors, strengths,
weaknesses and imaginations. Essentially, becoming a teacher lets you take part in shaping the
next generation.
Question #2
I believe that Teachers do more than teach, and their impact extends far beyond the classroom. As
a teacher, you are more than just an educator: you are a mentor, a confidant and a friend.
Question # 3
When we know when to listen to students and when to ignore them. Also, by learning have a
positive attitude. When you also know how to take risks and when we enjoy our work.
Question #4
First, know your subject. Manage your behaviour. Be patient and fair at all times.
Collaboration Worksheet
Questions Names of Shared Answers to Questions
2
Collaborators
Q#1
Q#2
Q#3
Q#4
Your
responses to
the questions
Compariso
n
Their
responses to
the questions
3
On Philosophical Orientations
A study was written and published by Gilbert C. Magulod Jr. of Cagayan State University. This
paper was titled “Educational Philosophies Adhered by Filipino Preservice Teachers: Basis for
Proposing Initiatives for 21st Century Teacher Education Preparation Program.” Its purpose
was to ascertain the educational philosophies adhered to by Filipino preservice teachers. This
survey research was conducted to 76 pre-service teachers. Results showed that the “Filipino
preservice teachers espoused a very high adherence to progressivism educational philosophy
and high orientation to existentialism and reconstructionism. They also showed a moderate
adherence to perennialism and existentialism philosophies” (Magulod, 2017, p. 1). These results
indicated that the pre-service teachers have espoused a high student-centered teaching belief
with partial acceptance to teacher-centered teaching beliefs.
2. Perennialism is another philosophical orientation. Its aim for education is to ensure that
learners acquire an understanding of the great ideas from Western culture and civilization. As a
focus, these ideas are believed to solve problems. These ideas are everlasting, unchanging so
human nature and the world the people live. Normally, the curriculum focuses on cultural
literacy and learners’ growth in enduring areas of studies. Its curriculum is centered on arts,
literature, laws, and principles of science. They inform us that humans are rational individuals.
Like essentialism, its priority is the cultivation of the intellect for a meaningful education. Both
the essentialism and perennialism are teacher-centered and sometimes considered as subjects-
centered. Thus, education is a mere transfer of knowledge and is limited in independent
learning.
3. Progressivism is shifting the focus of education to the learner instead of the teacher and
the subject. This orientation focuses on the whole child. The learners are the ones who would
test the ideas through experimentation if they work or not. Learning depends on experience and
the questions that the learners pose to themselves or by the teachers. Thus, the teachers should
provide a relevant and meaningful experience to learners. They should ask the right questions
that would guide learning. Explicitly, the learners are active agents of learning and they are not
mere recipients of knowledge.
4
main aim of education. Just like progressivism, it capitalizes on the learners’ experiences and
actions that address social problems. Its strategies in dealing with social issues include inquiry,
dialogue,
Note: For more details, you can look for other readings related to this topic.
5
Synthesis and Self-Assessment Worksheet
1. Essentialism
2. Perennialism
6
Sociological Perspectives of Education
Ballantine and Hammack (2012) wrote about three major sociological perspectives on
education. The table below illustrates the viewpoints of these perspectives.
Perspectives Assumptions
1. Functionalism In this perspective, education has several functions in society.
These functions include socialization, social integration, social
placement, and social and cultural innovation. All of these are
intended functions/purposes of education. In contrast, there are
also latent functions of education and these are unintended (e.g.
to marry while in schooling). Furthermore, education is seen as a
system where there are subsystems that function according to
the same purpose. So, if one subsystem does not work
accordingly, this can cause problems in other subsystems and to
education at large.
2. Conflict Theory In this perspective, education is seen as something that
promotes inequality. One example of a source of inequality is
the standardized test. Furthermore, schools receive a different
amount of funding and their learning conditions differ as well.
All of these would result in inequalities and disparities in
learning. Consequently, they may result in more serious social
inequality like job opportunities. That’s why some are employed
while others are unemployed and underemployed after
completing their education and training.
3. Symbolic This perspective centers its arguments on the social interaction
Interactionism in schools, particularly in the classrooms, playgrounds, and
other areas in the school where individuals can socialize. It
claims that
social interaction in schools affects the development of gender
roles and that teachers’ expectations of pupils’ intellectual
abilities. It also affects the way the learners learn and their
behaviors. As found, some educational problems are rooted in
social interaction and expectations.
Note: You may have additional readings about this topic.
ASSESSMENT
1. TedTalk
After learning the conceptual and theoretical underpinning of the lesson, it’s time for the
application of your knowledge on the topic. Earlier, you learned different philosophical
orientations. One or two of these may reflect the kind of teacher you want to be and the kind of
teacher you want to have in your journey towards fulfilling your dream. For this, you will be
making a 5-7-minute TedTalk (video). It is similar to a speech usually delivered in class or an
event. On this, you assume you are the guest at a conference. The very purpose of the invitation
7
was to inspire young pre-service teachers by sharing unto them your philosophy in teaching.
Also, you articulate what you believe about teaching and anchor it on a philosophical
orientation that reflects yourself. By this, you would achieve the first learning outcome
“Articulated an understanding of philosophical and sociological perspectives of education,
especially on ensuring a responsive learning environment in the classroom.” With this task, you
need a camera or just a cellphone camera to document yourself while delivering a speech.
Instructions:
Actual Delivery
9. Set up the camera and document your TedTalk.
10. Greet them. Say a short introduction about you and thank them for the opportunity to
inspire them.
11. As you start your formal speech, say something that can hook your audience. Give them
a reason to listen and learn from you.
12. Your TedTalk (video) will be evaluated using these criteria:
12.1 Organization, grammar and effective use language – 20%
12.2 The inspiring element of the message- 30%
12.3 Mastery and spontaneity- 30%
12.4 Total quality of the delivery – 20%
2. Analytical Paper
To achieve the 2nd and 3rd learning outcomes, you are advised to proceed to make an analytical
paper. In some books, it is called an analytical essay. For this task, you are to use the lens of
functionalism in analyzing an issue and problem which are considered dysfunctional in the
system. One assumption of functionalism is that subsystems within a system should work for
the same goals. Everyone with this each subsystem participates not unless they become
dysfunctional. Remember, this perspective has identified two purposes or goals of education
the so-called intended or manifest, and the unintended or the latent. In doing this, please be
guided with these instructions:
1. Consider our educational system in the country, specifically the basic education
managed by the Department of Education. If you are not familiar with the system, you
8
may ask a teacher from DepEd who has been serving the agency for the last 3 years or
so.
2. Identify the dysfunctional components of the basic education system in the country.
These components do not support or contribute to the attainment of the educational
goals of DepEd.
3. Give more details in your talk and explain to the readers why the problem takes place.
4. As a pre-service teacher, you are to propose solutions that address the dysfunctional
components of the educational system.
5. In the last part, challenge the readers to join with you in taking actions in solving the
problems, the dysfunctional part/s of the system.
6. Label your analytical paper with very attractive title- representative of the problem and
the solution.
REFERENCES
[1] Ercan, R. (2014). Eğitimin Felsefi Temelleri. Eğitim Bilimine Giriş. (8. Baskı). In Saylan, N.
(Ed.) Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
[2] Ergün, M. (2009). Eğitimin Felsefi Temelleri. Eğitim Bilimine Giriş. In Demirel, Ö. and Kaya,
Z. (Eds.) (2009). Ankara: PegemA. Yayınları.
[3]Magulod, G. C. (2017). Educational Philosophies Adhered by Filipino Preservice Teachers:
Basis for Proposing Initiatives for 21st Century Teacher Education Preparation Program.
Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 185-192. https://bit.ly/3cYa8mx
9
[4] Reyes, F. C., (2002). Unveiling teaching expertise: a showcase of sixty-nine outstanding teachers in
the Philippines. Manila: De La Salle University Press, Inc.
[5] Uyangör, N., Sahan, H. H., Atıcı, S., & Börekc, C. (2016). An Analysis of Educational
Philosophies and Teacher Competencies. International Journal of Current Research, 8,
(04), 30100-30106.
10