Multiliteracies Reflection
Multiliteracies Reflection
As teachers, we are responsible for teaching students to become functional members of society
in addition to delivering the curriculum content. I have learned that the multiliteracies
pedagogy is extensive, and it contains the tools that teachers need to deliver the curriculum
while simultaneously developing the skills that students need to think critically about the world
around them. I found the topic of digital literacy particularly valuable as this generation of
students has more access and exposure to technology than any cohort before them. I have
utilized technology in practicum as a resource for research, but the Digital Literacy Framework
(n.d.) aims to teach students how to navigate it safely, responsibly and considerately by
focusing on building skills such as Consumer Awareness and Ethics and Empathy. Critical literacy
is another important topic, and I have learned that it teaches students to apply their critical
thinking skills to consider different perspectives. As stated by Lewison, Flint and Sluys (2002),
critical literacy involves understanding experience and texts from our own perspectives and the
viewpoints of others. Lastly, this course has emphasized the importance of my role as a teacher,
as adjusting my teaching practices to match the needs of today’s society could make all the
The concepts that have been discussed throughout the course thus far focus on themes that
are relevant to today’s society. Social media and the use of technology have become a
prominent force in the world that dominates the younger generations. Global perspective is
Rhiannon Lewis
gaining prominence as our society is currently experiencing a push towards greater equality. I
believe that the goal of multiliteracies is to give students the tools they need to properly digest
the information around them and critically consider their role in society. It is my understanding
that the focuses of multiliteracy pedagogy are adaptable to what ever the societal context may
be. As stated by Kalantzis and Cope (2010), the agenda of the new learning is to meet the needs
of the knowledge society in a globalized world. Pedagogy of multiliteracies not only teaches
valuable life skills, but also keeps information relevant and engaging for students in the
classroom. In my teaching experience, I’ve found that students were most engaged when I
utilized content that was current and familiar to them. For example, discussing the impact that
the Australian forest fires had on ecosystem biodiversity. This encourages more discussion
about current subject matters in the context of the curriculum, and urges students to consider
the extent of the “ripple effect” that results from these kinds of events.
Although I find digital literacy extremely important and valuable for students to learn, it is
a concept that I was familiar with coming in to this course. Critical literacy, however, is
teacher candidate planning on teaching science at a secondary level, and there are several
topics in the curriculum that examine socioscientific issues. Discussing topics such as
climate change, GMOs and bioethics from a variety of perspectives encourages a well-
as opposed to falling victim to biases. That being said, being able to analyze these
skill for navigating life and academia. Implementing a multiliterate approach for teaching is
should place greater importance on developing transferable skills with their students.
education system, the shift from passing on knowledge to actively engaging students in
their own learning. The setting where learning is taking place should not affect a teacher’s
As stated by Kalantzis and Cope (2010), both the “new learner” and “new teacher” are
comfortable with technology are usually keener to incorporate it into their practice, but the
current pandemic has forced all teachers to work outside of their comfort zones. This
includes utilizing resources that they may have never considered before. This aligns with
the goals of multiliteracies pedagogy, which encourages both teachers and students to
explore a variety of resources to support their understanding of a given topic. For in-
person instruction, teachers should be mindful of how much time they are spending
lecturing while students sit at their desks silently. Using multiple mediums that encourage
students to interact with the teacher and each other may prove to be a more effective way
to deliver content. For hybrid and online learning, it may be beneficial to allow students to
process the content asynchronously at a rate that works best for them. Then in a
Rhiannon Lewis
stimulating manner.
References
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2010). The Teacher as Designer: Pedagogy in the New Media Age.
E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200–222.
https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.200
Lewison, M., Seely Flint, A., & Van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey
of newcomers and novices. Language Arts, 79(5), 382-392.
USE, UNDERSTAND & CREATE: A Digital Literacy Framework for Canadian Schools –
Overview. (2019, February 22). Retrieved November 14, 2020, from
https://mediasmarts.ca/teacher-resources/digital-literacy-framework/use-
understand-create-digital-literacy-framework-canadian-schools-overview