Introduction of The Consumer Protection Act
Introduction of The Consumer Protection Act
Consumer protection was not necessary when the world was younger and
communities smaller. In the lifestyle of those times unfair trade was almost
impossible. The industrial revolution and a shift of population from rural areas to
towns and anonymity of urban living gave plenty of scope for malpractices.
In our country, buyers have a very weak bargaining power and cannot assert their
right being heard. Consequently, manufacturers and traders are tempted to follow
diverse practices which turn out to be unfair to consumers. To check the onslaught on
consumers, a host of legislations were enacted. These include Sale of Goods Act,
1930; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954;
Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities
Act, 1980; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1956; Agricultural Products and
Grading and Marketing Act (AGMARK), 1937; Indian Standards Bureau Certification
Act, 1952; MRTP Act, 1969 etc.
Besides the applicability of the above legislations, the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
was enacted which was substantially amended by the Consumer Protection
(Amendment) Act, 1993 i.e. 18th June, 1993.
2. Consumer wants protection against deceptive and unfair trade and market
practices.
3. Consumers protection is needed against all types of pollution so that they can
enjoy a healthy environment-free from water, air and food pollution.
On the one hand consumers, particularly in India, are unorganized, illiterate and
ignorant, poor and backward, relatively uninformed and above all they still have the
traditional outlook and attitude to suffer in silence. On the other side, businessmen
and traders are organized, well-informed, intelligent and competent sellers. The
negative sides of our life have enabled unscrupulous businessmen to exploit
consumers in India. Consumers in modern markets are amateurs whereas the persons
confronting them are professional sellers. The consumer choice is influenced by mass
advertising and other promotional devices which make people want things which
neither they really need nor they can afford.
5. Right to Get Redress: There should be prompt settlement of complaints and claims
lodged by aggrieved customers. This will ensure consumer confidence and provide
justice to buyers. Incidentally, it will also enhance seller’s goodwill and reputation. For
this purpose a number of consumer courts and agencies have been specifically set up.
6. Right to Receive After-Sale Service: It is essential in costly and durable goods i.e.,
mechanical and electrical/electronic appliances.
2. Business, by self-regulation and by giving a fair deal to the retailers and consumers.
Self policing is far more superior to state policing in the field of marketing. It is in the
self-interest of the business itself. Government intervention takes place only to
protect the weaker party in the market (consumers) and to prevent its exploitation by
the stronger party (businessmen). “Absence of voluntary business correctives leads to
consumer legislation.” To provide simple, speedy and inexpensive redressed of
consumer grievances, the Act envisages three-tier quasi-judicial machinery at the
district, state and national levels. At the district level these are to be district fore as
the redressed for. The state government may, if it deems fit, establish more than one
district forum for a district. At the state level, there are to be similar redressed
commissions to be known as State Commissions and at the national level, there is a
National Consumer Disputes Redressed Commission to be known as National
Commission.
If these correctives are actively adopted by all groups, it would indeed be a giant step
for consumers and the appropriate response to the phenomenon known as
consumerism.
2. The role of government which can enact laws for the protection of consumers and
make arrangements for their enforcement.
2. They have been pressing for proper labeling of the products with maximum price to
be charged, the contents of the product, especially drugs, side effects if any, of the
product etc.
3. Organizing movements against the malpractices of manufacturers and traders of
the products.
In Delhi, Mumbai and other important cities voluntary consumer organizations came
into existence in sixties and seventies when prices of goods rose very high to resist
the hike in prices by traders arbitrarily. The idea of Super Bazaar on cooperative
principles emerged from this price resistance movements of consumers. Besides, an
organization named ‘Common Cause’ established by late. Mr. H.D. Shourie and based
in Delhi did a very useful work in protecting the rights of consumers. Consumer
cooperative movement also started to protect the consumers against the
malpractices and traders of goods. A consumer cooperative is a voluntary association
of consumers formed to promote their interests. The consumers enhance their
bargaining power as against traders and manufacturers.
2. Secondly, the consumers themselves control the cooperatives. They are therefore
assured of standard quality and unadulterated goods.
3. Correct weights and measures are used by the cooperative societies and therefore
consumers are saved from any deception in this regard.
(9) Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Essential Commodities Act, and
Above all, in 1986, the Indian government passed Consumer Protection Act. Under it
the consumers have the right to approach appropriate consumer forum or
commission set up under the Act to get their complaints redressed. In what follows
we will explain the provisions of Consumer Protection Act 1986.
In C. P. Moosa vs. Chowgle Industries Ltd. the appellant had purchased EPBAX system
for his hotel with warranty and annual maintenance contract. There was a deficiency
of service during the warranty period and AMC period. The National Commission held
that case falls under Section 2(1)(d)(ii) and appellant entitled to compensation.
In the matter of Dr. Vijai Prakash Goyal vs. the Network Limited the National
Commission held that purchaser of a machine would be a consumer if the defect in
machine develops within warranty period even though the machine was purchased
for the commercial purpose.
3. Unfair Trade Practices The Act introduces a specific broad definition of Unfair
Trade Practices, which also includes sharing of personal information given by
the consumer in confidence, unless such disclosure is made in accordance with
the provisions of any other law. Misleading advertisements are also under the
ambit of ‘Unfair Trade Practices’ in the new act.
7. Provision for Mediation If the consumers wish to resolve the dispute outside
the court, there is a provision for Mediation as well. The dispute can be
referred to Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Redressed Mechanism. There is
also a provision for setting up of Consumer Mediation Cell. This provision would
ease the existing burden of zillions of cases on courts and enable quicker
disposal of cases at hand.
8. Revised Pecuniary Jurisdiction The new Act has enhanced the pecuniary
jurisdiction of Consumer Courts at various levels. The District Commission shall
now entertain with cases where value of goods and services paid are up to 1
crores, State Commission with cases up to 10 crores and National Commission
with cases exceeding the value of 10 crores.
CONCLUSION
The law of Consumer Protection is intricate, spans various
jurisdictions, and can be constantly changing. Despite all this, a law
student or new attorney can better understand the field by following
the tips identified in this Research Guide. When researching in this
field, remember the value of beginning research online for free. If no
valuable search results are returned, then only some time has been
lost. If, however, a researcher quickly identifies the applicable
statute or regulation through the online search, time and cost can be
saved. Likewise, secondary sources (specifically, on-point treatises)
are critical to navigating the large amount of authority in this area of
the law; these should be consulted. Follow up with traditional
methods of legal research to see how the identified statute or
regulation has been construed by courts of the applicable jurisdiction.