Reliability Improvement With Optimal Placement of Distributed Generation in Distribution System
Reliability Improvement With Optimal Placement of Distributed Generation in Distribution System
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(10) 2013 1308 ISNI:0000000091950263
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Vol:7, No:10, 2013
ASUI = 1 − ASAI =
∑Ui Ni (5)
∑ Ni × 8760
Energy not supplied index (ENS)
AENS =
∑ La(i)Ui
Fig. 1 Search direction of Tabu search (7)
∑ Ni
where
λi = failure rate of contingency i
Ni =
Open Science Index, Electrical and Computer Engineering Vol:7, No:10, 2013 waset.org/Publication/17067
where
System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) La (i ) = average load connected to load point i
ASAI =
∑ Ni × 8760 − ∑Ui Ni (4)
NB
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(10) 2013 1309 ISNI:0000000091950263
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Vol:7, No:10, 2013
2) Voltage of each bus k must be within specified limits: iteration and iteration index m=1.
Vk min ≤ Vk ≤ Vk max (11) Step 2: Let the initial solution obtained in step 1 be the
current solution and the best solution: Sbest = S0, and
3) Current transfer capability of feeders l : Scurrent = S0.
Step 3: Perform a power flow analysis to determine whether the
Il ≤ Ilmax ; l ∈ {1, 2,..., Nl } (12) current solution satisfies the constraints defined in (9)
and (10). A penalty factor is applied for constraint
4) Maximum number of DGs (nDG ) to be installed: violation.
NB Step 4: Calculate ECOST using (8) with consideration of load
point restoration.
∑ e jk ≤ nDG j ∈ {1, 2,..., NC } (13)
Step 5: Calculate the aspiration level of Sbest : fbest = f(Sbest).
k =1
The aspiration level is the sum of ECOST and a
5) Maximum installed capacity of DGs: penalty function.
N B NC Step 6: Generate a set of solutions in the neighborhood of
∑ ∑ C j ⋅ e jk ≤G (14) Scurrent. This set of solutions is designated as Sneighbor.
k =1 j =1 Step7: Calculate the aspiration level for each member of
6) Decision variables for the installation of a DG: Sneighbor , and choose the one that has the highest
aspiration level, Sneighbor_best.
⎧⎪ 0 if the DG is not installed at bus k ⎫⎪⎪
Open Science Index, Electrical and Computer Engineering Vol:7, No:10, 2013 waset.org/Publication/17067
V. SOLUTION ALGORITHM
The solution algorithm for the problem is described step by
step as follows:
Step 1: Randomly select a feasible solution from the search
space: S0 ∈ Ω. Set the size of a Tabu list, maximum
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(10) 2013 1310 ISNI:0000000091950263
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Vol:7, No:10, 2013
TABLE I
CASE STUDY FOR RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
Maximum number Total installed capacity,
Case
of DGs, nDG (unit) G (kW)
1 - -
2 1 ≤ 1000
3 3 ≤ 2000
4 3 ≤ 3000
5 4 ≤ 4000
TABLE II
OPTIMAL PLACEMENT AND SIZING OF DGS
Location of DG Capacity of DG installed Total capacity
Case
(bus) (kW) of DG (kW)
1 - - -
2 5 500 0500
3 3, 5, 11 100, 500, 500 1100
4 10, 11, 15 1000, 600, 1200 2800
5 5, 10, 12, 15 600, 1200, 200, 1200 3200
Open Science Index, Electrical and Computer Engineering Vol:7, No:10, 2013 waset.org/Publication/17067
All the cases have the same SAIFI because this index
depends only on the reliability of components (e.g., lines,
transformers) and is not affected distributed generations to be
installed. We can see that the overall reliability indices of
cases 2 to 5 in Table III are improved compared with that of
case 1 (base case). In cases 2, 3, 4 and 5, where the number of
DGs is limited at 1, 2, 3 and 4 unit respectively, see reductions
in the system ECOST.
TABLE III
RESULT OF CASE STUDY FOR RELIABILITY INDICES
Fig. 3 Flowchart for solution algorithm
Cases
Reliability indices
1 2 3 4 5
SAIFI
0.2482 0.2482 0.2482 0.2482 0.2482
(interruptions/customer yr)
SAIDI
3.7321 3.7290 3.7261 3.7253 3.7251
(hours/customer yr)
CAIDI
(hours/customer 15.036 15.024 15.012 15.009 15.008
interruption)
ASAI 0.9996 0.9996 0.9996 0.9996 0.9996
ASUI 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004
ENS (kWh/year) 40,775.30 40,509.70 40,256.00 39,455.40 39,443.60
AENS
21.37 21.23 21.10 20.68 20.67
(kWh/customer/year)
ECOST ($/year) 49,922.30 47,552.80 45,288.70 43,262.90 43,157.60
ECOST reduction (%) - 4.75 9.28 13.34 13.55
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(10) 2013 1311 ISNI:0000000091950263
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Vol:7, No:10, 2013
VII. CONCLUSION
The search for the best compromise among the objectives is
achieved by Tabu search technique for optimal placement and
sizing of distributed generation in distribution systems.
Employing DG in a distribution system results in several benefits
such as increased overall system efficiency. The effectiveness of
the proposed method was demonstrated by a case study of a
distribution network of RBTS bus 2. It can be seen from the
case study that distributed generation can reduce the customer
interruption cost and therefore improve the reliability of the
system. It is expected that our proposed method will be
utilized effectively for distribution system operator.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to express his gratitude to
Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon,
Thailand for support.
REFERENCES
[1] D. T. Wang, L. F. Ochoa, and G. P. Harrison, “DG impact on investment
deferral: network planning and security of supply,” IEEE Trans. Power
System, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1134-1141, May 2010.
[2] J. Zhang, H. Cheng, and C. Wang, “Technical and economic impacts of
active management on distribution network,” Electrical Power and
Energy Systems, vol. 31, pp. 130-138, 2009.
[3] J. Mutale, “Benefits of active management of distribution networks with
distributed generation,” in Proc. Power System Conf. and Exposition.
pp. 601 – 606, 2006.
[4] L. F. Ochoa, A. P. Feltrin, and G. P. Harrison, “Evaluating distributed time-
varying generation through a multiobjective index,” IEEE Trans. Power
Delivery, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1132-1138, April 2008.
[5] R. Billinton, and R. N. Allan, “Reliability evaluation of power systems,”
pitman advanced publishing program, 1984.
[6] D. Bernaand, and A. Cigdem, “Simulation optimization using tabu
search,” in Proc. Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 805-810. 2000.
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(10) 2013 1312 ISNI:0000000091950263