Conceptual Design of Truss and Column Solutions

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

SS050a-EN-EU
Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and

column solutions
This document presents different applications of trusses and examples of conceptual
designs of trusses and columns for single storey buildings.
Contents
1. Introduction 2
2. Trusses 2
3. Columns 6
4. Background material 8
This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
Created on Tuesday, December 04, 2007
Page 1

SS050a-EN-EU
1. Introduction
A truss can be defined as a beam with an open web, formed by a triangulated arrangement of
linear elements. A typical arrangement of a truss is shown in Figure 1.1. This arrangement
has parallel ‘chords’ (equivalent to flanges) and the ‘web’ is provided by a mixture of
‘diagonals’ and ‘posts’ or ‘verticals’ (at right angles to the chords). There are many
alternative arrangements of trusses: there are different arrangements of diagonals; sometimes
there are only diagonal web members (no posts); sometimes the chords are not parallel to one
another.
A
B
C
D
Key A – Upper chord, B – Vertical or post, C – Diagonal, D – Lower chord
Figure 1.1 Different parts of a truss

2. Trusses
The truss’ primary advantage towards other solutions is that with a proper design a strong,
stiff and weight-efficient member is achieved. Often, economical aspects determine whether
a truss or a steel beam is chosen for the roof structure and here the span and the magnitude of
load is of importance. The savings in steel weight for a truss compared to a steel beam gets
bigger with larger spans and when the material savings makes up for the higher fabrication
costs the truss is chosen. When choosing between a hinged truss and a hinged hot rolled
beam the truss is normally the best choice for spans exceeding about 15 m.
A roof truss together with pinned columns and a roof sheeting used as both lateral bracing for
the rafters and as a stressed skin diaphragm to transfer the wind forces to the wind bracings is
often the most economical way to stabilise a open plan building. When it is important to keep
the building height to a minimum or difficulties in making room for the vertical wind-bracing,
portal frames can be taken into consideration since they have a lower section height due to a
different bending moment distribution.
Sometimes the great possibility for installing ventilation and service pipes through the web in
a truss is an advantage worth consideration.
2.1 Applications
The main use of trusses is for roof trusses and wind bracings, which here is considered as a
truss, see Figure 2.1. Occasionally it is also advantageous to use trusses for trimmer joists
and columns, i.e. very large columns with dominating bending.
Page 2

SS050a-EN-EU
D B
C B C
D
A B-B
C-C D-D
Key:
A – Horizontal wind bracing for use with pinned columns
B-B – Roof truss
C-C and D-D – Vertical wind bracings
Figure 2.1 Trusses
2.2 Design
The truss should preferably be designed such that loads are applied at the joints to keep the
magnitude of the chord moment to a minimum. This means that purlins are positioned over
the joints in the upper chord and that girders for hoists are hung in the joints in the lower
chord member. In large chord-members minor loads may be applied between the joints.
2.2.1 Roof trusses

The normal span lengths for industrial buildings are 12 – 35 m. The roof trusses are produced
in a workshop and transported to the construction site, if possible in its full length. Longer
components can be divided into two or more parts and jointed together at the site. For wide
buildings and if inner columns are accepted it is favourable to divide the building into two
sections. To avoid an inside gutter, that always comes with a risk for leakage, it is possible to
keep one crest and use two trusses, see Figure 2.2. Since the required free height normally is
at the lowest part of the rafters the available height in the middle of the building is large, this
can be used for a primary truss and every second of the inner columns can be avoided.
Page 3

SS050a-EN-EU
B b
c
h
b b b
a a a a a
B
A B-B
Key
A – Roof truss a – column
B-B – Primary truss b – roof truss
h – Height available for primary truss c – primary truss
Figure 2.2 Roof truss and primary truss

The roof slope is normally chosen to 1:16 or 1:10, depending on type of roofing. A slope less
than 1:16 should be used with caution since the deflection decreases the inclination and if the
actual roof slope becomes too small trouble with water run-off can give problems with water
accumulation (ponding). The smallest possible slope depends on the size of the snow load. A
rough estimate of the section height for a gabled truss is that for roof slope 1:16 H = L/25 –
L/30 and for slope 1:10 H = L/35 to L/40 where H is the depth at the support. For parallel
trusses the relation is approximately, H = L/20.
The truss patterns usually used are shown in Figure 2.3, where (a) is perhaps the most
common truss due to its simple detailing. Figure 2.3(b) is of the same kind but strengthened
with verticals for longer spans. Figure 2.3(c) shows a truss with all the diagonals subjected to
tension and the shorter verticals handling the compressive forces; this makes it possible to use
diagonals with small cross-sections, resulting in an economic design.
(a) (b) ©
Figure 2.3 Typical truss patterns
Because of rational fabrication the most cost effective sections for trusses usually are channel
or angle sections, see Figure 2.4. There are several companies specialised in producing rafters
of this type. An alternative section often used is a rectangular hollow section (RHS). When
the chords are subjected to loads between the truss nodes that give bending moments, an I-
section can be the most favourable section.
Page 4

SS050a-EN-EU
a
A a-a
b
B b-b
Key: A – Truss with U-sections, B – Truss with RHS sections
Figure 2.4 Rafters with different cross-sections
Deflections are usually a minor problem in this type of buildings. Therefore it is often
economical to choose a minimum steel grade of S355. The most common is to use hot rolled
sections, but it is also possible to use cold-formed sections.
2.2.2 Erection
Roof trusses are usually welded at the workshop and transported full size. Where the truss is
larger than can conveniently be transported in one piece, it is fabricated in several parts and
the parts joined together at site. Trusses up to about 20 m long and up to about 3,5 m deep
can be readily transported in most European countries. .
For long span trusses it is important to include a design for the erection stage. For example, if
the truss is lifted in its whole length the truss needs to be designed to carry its self-weight,
unrestrained. The building may also need temporary restraints – see SS048.
2.2.3 Wind-bracings
The horizontal wind bracing in a roof works as a beam with the vertical wind-bracings as
support. In general, purlins are used as chords and the truss is made complete by adding
diagonals.
Vertical wind-bracings are positioned in the column lines and use the columns as chord-
members. To minimise the effects of temperature changes in long buildings the trusses
should be placed as close as possible to the middle of the building. Depending on the design
the diagonals can be subjected to just tension or both tension and compression, see Figure 2.5.
If deformations do not govern, “the tension only” design is more economical. The choice of
Page 5

SS050a-EN-EU
cross-section is made from an economical point of view and for members subjected to tension
only, round bars, L-sections or channels should be used. For members subjected to
compression a rectangular hollow section (RHS) is a good choice. However, sometimes the
choice of an H-section is more economic, because of more easily executed connections or
because of substantial bending moments from cranes. The bracing is usually placed with an
offset from a crane runway girder and the horizontal force from the crane girder causes this
bending moment. Such diagonals are usually braced for buckling in the weak direction, as
shown in Figure 2.5(b).
(a) (c)
1 2 2
1
(b) (d)
Key:
(a) Wind-bracing subjected to compression and tension without crane girder
(b) Wind-bracing subjected to compression and tension with crane girder
(c) Wind-bracing subjected to tension without crane girder
(d) Wind-bracing subjected to tension with crane girder
1 Optional bracing
2 Crane girder
Figure 2.5 Typical wind-bracing arrangements in walls
3. Columns
In addition to the function to carry vertical loads from snow, cranes etcetera, columns in
industrial buildings must be designed to carry the bending caused by wind loads at the
exterior wall structure and horizontal loads from cranes. Since the horizontal loads results in
bending moments in the columns the most common cross-section is the rolled HEA-sections.
Also HEB-, IPE- and RHS-sections are used and, for larger buildings, welded H- or box-
sections and sometimes trusses are selected. Different column types are shown in Figure 3.1.
Page 6

SS050a-EN-EU
A B C D E
Key: C HEA, HEB with support for a crane girder
A RHS D Welded section with support for a crane girder
B HEA, HEB, IPE E Truss with support for a crane girder.
Figure 3.1 Different column-types
3.1 Design
RHS-columns have a large capacity to carry vertical loads but they are less economic to carry
horizontal load. This makes them well suited for inner columns in buildings without cranes.
For outer columns in high buildings with large wind-loads and for inner columns carrying
cranes, a better option would be an H-section for its better bending resistance in relation to the
steel weight. IPE may be used in some applications but they are slender in the weak direction
and require closely spaced lateral bracings.
In larger industrial-buildings with heavy cranes welded profiles of H-section or RHS-section

are used. An unsymmetrical profile can be considered due to eccentric loading. The change
of section can be used to achieve a natural shelf for the crane girder. The truss column shown
in Figure 3.1E is only used in very large buildings with very heavy cranes, for example a steel
mill.
Page 7

SS050a-EN-EU
4. Background material
1 L. Cederfeldt, Hallbyggnader, SBI Publ. 53, Stålbyggnadsinstitutet, Stockholm 1977
Page 8

SS050a-EN-EU
Quality Record
RESOURCE TITLE Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column
solutions
Reference(s)
ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
Name Company Date
Created by Björn Uppfeldt SBI
Technical content checked by Bernt Johansson SBI
Editorial content checked by
Technical content endorsed by the

following STEEL Partners:
1. UK G W Owens SCI 23/5/06
2. France A Bureau CTICM 23/5/06

3. Sweden B Uppfeldt SBI 23/5/06
4. Germany C Müller RWTH 23/5/06
5. Spain J Chica Labein 23/5/06
Resource approved by Technical G W Owens SCI 14/7/06

Coordinator
TRANSLATED DOCUMENT
This Translation made and checked by:
Translated resource approved by:

Page 9

Conceptual Design of Truss and Column Solutions

Uploaded by

Conceptual Design of Truss and Column Solutions

Uploaded by

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

Key A – Upper chord, B – Vertical or post, C – Diagonal, D – Lower chord

Figure 1.1 Different parts of a truss

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

Figure 2.1 Trusses

2.2.1 Roof trusses

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

Figure 2.2 Roof truss and primary truss

Figure 2.3 Typical truss patterns

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

Key: A – Truss with U-sections, B – Truss with RHS sections

Figure 2.4 Rafters with different cross-sections

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

Figure 2.5 Typical wind-bracing arrangements in walls

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

Figure 3.1 Different column-types

In larger industrial-buildings with heavy cranes welded profiles of H-section or RHS-section

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

Scheme Development: Conceptual design of truss and column solutions

Name Company Date

Created by Björn Uppfeldt SBI

Technical content checked by Bernt Johansson SBI

Editorial content checked by

Technical content endorsed by the

1. UK G W Owens SCI 23/5/06

2. France A Bureau CTICM 23/5/06

3. Sweden B Uppfeldt SBI 23/5/06

4. Germany C Müller RWTH 23/5/06

5. Spain J Chica Labein 23/5/06

Resource approved by Technical G W Owens SCI 14/7/06

This Translation made and checked by:

Translated resource approved by:

You might also like