Scribd
Upload
62 views4 pages

Univariate Analysis of Learning Outcomes

1. A univariate analysis of variance (UNIANOVA) was conducted to examine the effects of class (experimental vs control) and student ability (high vs low) on student learning outcomes. 2. The results indicated significant main effects of class and student ability on learning outcomes, as well as a significant interaction between class and student ability. 3. Estimated marginal means showed that the experimental class had higher learning outcomes than the control class, and high ability students had higher outcomes than low ability students. The effect of class depended on student ability level.

Uploaded by

laela
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
62 views4 pages

Univariate Analysis of Learning Outcomes

1. A univariate analysis of variance (UNIANOVA) was conducted to examine the effects of class (experimental vs control) and student ability (high vs low) on student learning outcomes. 2. The results indicated significant main effects of class and student ability on learning outcomes, as well as a significant interaction between class and student ability. 3. Estimated marginal means showed that the experimental class had higher learning outcomes than the control class, and high ability students had higher outcomes than low ability students. The effect of class depended on student ability level.

Uploaded by

laela
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

UNIANOVA Hasil BY Kelas Kemampuan

/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/POSTHOC=Kelas Kemampuan(TUKEY SCHEFFE)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Kelas)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Kemampuan)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Kelas*Kemampuan)
/PRINT=HOMOGENEITY DESCRIPTIVE
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN=Kelas Kemampuan Kelas*Kemampuan.

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Notes

Output Created 04-OCT-2021 [Link]


Comments
Input Data D:\DATA [Link]
Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data
36
File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated
as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases with
valid data for all variables in the model.
Syntax UNIANOVA Hasil BY Kelas
Kemampuan
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/POSTHOC=Kelas
Kemampuan(TUKEY SCHEFFE)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Kelas)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Kemampuan)

/EMMEANS=TABLES(Kelas*Kemampu
an)
/PRINT=HOMOGENEITY
DESCRIPTIVE
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN=Kelas Kemampuan
Kelas*Kemampuan.
Resources Processor Time [Link],02

Elapsed Time [Link],03

Warnings

Post hoc tests are not performed for Kelas because there are fewer than three groups.
Post hoc tests are not performed for Kemampuan Siswa because there are fewer than
three groups.

Between-Subjects Factors

Value Label N

Kelas 1 Kelas
18
Eksperimen

2 Kelas Kontrol 18
Kemampuan Siswa 1 Tinggi 18

2 Rendah 18

Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable: Hasil Belajar Siswa
Kelas Kemampuan Siswa Mean Std. Deviation N

Kelas Eksperimen Tinggi 90,56 6,346 9

Rendah 70,56 5,270 9

Total 80,56 11,743 18


Kelas Kontrol Tinggi 75,56 5,270 9
Rendah 66,67 3,536 9
Total 71,11 6,314 18
Total Tinggi 83,06 9,570 18

Rendah 68,61 4,791 18

Total 75,83 10,454 36

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa


Dependent Variable: Hasil Belajar Siswa

F df1 df2 Sig.

,794 3 32 ,506

Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of


the dependent variable is equal across groups.a
a. Design: Intercept + Kelas + Kemampuan +
Kelas * Kemampuan

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects


Dependent Variable: Hasil Belajar Siswa

Type III Sum of


Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Corrected Model 2958,333a 3 986,111 36,410 ,000


Intercept 207025,000 1 207025,000 7644,000 ,000
Kelas 802,778 1 802,778 29,641 ,000
Kemampuan 1877,778 1 1877,778 69,333 ,000
Kelas * Kemampuan 277,778 1 277,778 10,256 ,003
Error 866,667 32 27,083
Total 210850,000 36
Corrected Total 3825,000 35

a. R Squared = ,773 (Adjusted R Squared = ,752)


Estimated Marginal Means

1. Kelas
Dependent Variable: Hasil Belajar Siswa

95% Confidence Interval

Kelas Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

Kelas Eksperimen 80,556 1,227 78,057 83,054


Kelas Kontrol 71,111 1,227 68,613 73,610

2. Kemampuan Siswa
Dependent Variable: Hasil Belajar Siswa

95% Confidence Interval

Kemampuan Siswa Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

Tinggi 83,056 1,227 80,557 85,554


Rendah 68,611 1,227 66,113 71,110

3. Kelas * Kemampuan Siswa


Dependent Variable: Hasil Belajar Siswa

95% Confidence Interval

Kelas Kemampuan Siswa Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

Kelas Eksperimen Tinggi 90,556 1,735 87,022 94,089

Rendah 70,556 1,735 67,022 74,089


Kelas Kontrol Tinggi 75,556 1,735 72,022 79,089

Rendah 66,667 1,735 63,133 70,200

You might also like