RAJIV GANDHI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

OF LAW

FAMILY LAW PROJECT

TOPIC: FEASIBILITY OF UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IN INDIA

SUBMITTED BY: SUBMITTED TO:

DEVANSHI GUPTA DR. KAMALJIT KAUR

ROLL NO. ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF LAW

18192

GROUP NO.

31

1
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

S.NO TOPIC PAGE

2. HISTORY 4

3. SECULARISM, CONSTITUTION AND UNIFORM CIVIL 5

4. UCC AND ROLE OF JUDICIARY 6

5. NEED OF UCC IN INDIA 8

6. CONCLUSION 11

2
INTRODUCTION

Uniform Civil Code, a common code that connotes the idea of similar set of civil rules
regardless of their religion, caste, sex etc. has now-a-days propounded a high-powered
controversy in India. Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is the manifestation of contemporary
progressive nation, which shows that the nation has been elevated from religion, race, caste,
and sex and birth discrimination. UCC entreats to replace the personal laws based on customs
of each religion with a common set governing each citizen. Such laws address four broad
areas: Marriage, Divorce, and Maintenance & Succession. If implemented in true spirit, then
these three words are sufficient enough to divide the country politically, religiously and
socially. In India even after 69 years of independence people are still being dominated by the
personal laws of their respective communities. The framers of the constitution with a view to
achieve uniformity of law incorporated Article 44 that runs as follows: “The State shall
endeavor to secure for all citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.” 1
Uniform Civil Code is a term which has its roots from the concept of Civil Law Code. 2 The
purpose concealed in the uniform civil code is to eliminate the contradictions based on
religious ideologies and promote the concept of national integration. All communities in the
country would then be judged on a similar platform in civil matters and would not be
governed by diverse personal laws.

Though Article 37 of the Constitution provides that directive principles of state policy are not
enforceable by the Court of Law. But it does not reduce the importance of the directive
principles. Just after Independence it was not feasible to impose a Uniform Civil Code on the
citizens as per the circumstances. So this was the reason that the code has been covered under
the directive principle of state policy.

Also the preamble of Indian constitution is the mirror of constitutional spirit. It emphasizes to
constitute India as a Sovereign, Secular, Democratic, Republic nation. It contains those
elements which are the soul of the Constitution. It ensures Justice, liberty, and equality to the
citizens and thereby promote solidarity while assuring dignity of the individual and unity and
integrity of the nation.

1
V.N. Shukla, The Constitution of India, 308 (2001)
2
A civil code is a systematic collection of laws designed to comprehensively deal with the core areas of private
law such as for dealing with business and negligence lawsuits and practices.

3
So, in this context the importance of uniform civil code can be visualized. The makers of the
Indian Constitution were convinced that certain amount of modernization is required before
uniform civil code is imposed upon the citizens.
HISTORY

After India became independent Uniform Civil Code was a highly debated issue in the
Parliament of India in the year 1948. On one side great personalities like Dr. B.R. Ambedkar,
supported by other eminent nationalists like Gopal Swamy Iyenger, Anantasayam Iyengar,
KM Munshiji and others were in favour of the Uniform Civil Code whereas it was strongly
opposed by Muslim fundamentalists like Poker Sahib and people from other religions. The
argument on UCC was heated when Constituent Assembly raised the idea of Uniform Civil
Code in 1947 and was incorporated as one of the directive principles of the State policy by
the sub-committee on Fundamental Rights and Clause 39 of the draft directive principles of
the state policy provided that the State shall endeavour to secure for the citizen a Uniform
Civil Code. The feud was that the different personal laws of communities based on religion,
kept India back from advancing to nationhood and the Uniform Civil Code should be
guaranteed to Indian people. The Chairman of the drafting committee of the Constitution, Dr.
B.R. Ambedkar, said that, “We have in this country uniform code of laws covering almost
every aspect of human relationship. We have a uniform and complete criminal code operating
throughout the country which is contained in the Indian Penal Code and the Criminal
Procedure Code. The only province the civil law has not been able to invade so far as the
marriage and succession … and it is the intention of those who desire to have Article 35 as a
part of Constitution so as to bring about the change.” 3 Earlier, during the rule of Congress
party, it had assured Muslims to practice their Islamic personal Laws and thus the architects
of the Constitution, compromised by including the enactment of a Uniform Civil Code under
the Directive Principles of State Policy in Article-44 of the Constitution, i.e. it will be binding
on the State to adopt the Uniform Civil Code system rather it will only act as persuasive legal
provision. Nehru said in 1954 in the Parliament, “I do not think at the present time the time is
ripe for me to try to push it (Uniform Civil Code) through.”4

Since the Uniform Civil Code was a politically sensitive issue, the founding fathers of the
Constitution arrived at an honorable compromise by placing it under Article 44 as a directive
principle of state.
3
Lok Sabha Secretariat, Constituent Assembly Debates Vol. III, 551, 23 Nov. 1948.
4
Virendra Kumar, “Towards a Uniform Civil Code: Judicial Vicissitudes [from Sarla Mudgal (1995) to Lily
Thomas (2000)]” 42 JILI 315 (2000)

4
In the year 1955 Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru thought of codifying personal laws but it
was obstructed by the orthodox elements, as it promoted monogamy, divorce and equal
division of property between son, daughter and widow, adoption, maintenance to wife etc.
but later Nehru was convinced and brought in the Hindu Code Bill in the same year. The
major criticisms to the Code were that it did not touch upon the Muslim community and it
was here that Nehru’s idea of secularism suffered a certain extent of lacuna. Therefore, a
lesser version of Hindu Code was passed after a long opposition in the parliament between
1955-56 sessions. The BJP was the first party to promise the UCC if elected into power.
Presently Goa is the only state, which has the UCC. Goa’s uniform civil code happily
coexists with a variety of personal codes available to followers of particular faiths. Goa is the
only state to have implemented the directive principle on the Uniform Civil Code and
converted it into a law called the Goa Civil Code or the Goa Family Law. It is the set of civil
laws that governs all the residents of Goa irrespective of the religion or the ethnicity to which
they belong. But it makes available an option and underlines the point that a uniform civil
code and personal laws do not represent an either/or choice and that the one does not mandate
the obliteration of the other.

SECULARISM, CONSTITUTION AND UNIFORM CIVIL CODE

The spine of controversy revolving around UCC has been secularism and the freedom of
religion enumerated in the Constitution of India under Article 25 & 26 . J. Reddy stated that
the religion is the matter of individual faith and cannot be mixed with secular activities as
secular activities can be regulated by the State. 5 UCC is not opposed to secularism or will not
violate Article 25 and 26. Article 44 is based on the concept that there is no necessary
connection between religion and personal law in a civilized society.

The conflict between secular and religious authorities over the issue of UCC eventually
decreased, until the Shah Bano case, where then the Chief Justice of India J. Y.V.
Chandrachud observed that ‘A common civil code will help the cause of national integration
by removing disparate loyalties to law which have conflicting ideologies’6

The preamble of the Constitution states that India is a "secular democratic republic". A
secular State does not discriminate against anyone on the ground of religion, it is only
concerned with the relation between man and man and not with the relation of man with God.

5
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, (1994)3 SCC 1
6
Mohammad Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, AIR 1985 SC 945

5
In India, positive secularism distinguishes spiritualism with individual faith. Positive
secularism is a common doctrine of secularism accepted by America and some European
states i.e. there is a wall of separation between religion and State. The reason is that America
and the European countries went through the stages of renaissance, reformation and
enlightenment and thus they can enact a law stating that State shall not interfere with religion.

Whereas, India has not experienced such stages and thus there is interference of State in the
matters of religion so as to remove the impediments in the governance of the State. The right
to freedom of religion is guaranteed under Articles 25 and 26 of the Indian Constitution.
Article 25 provides every person the freedom of conscience and the right to profess practice
and propagate religion. It envisages power to the State to regulate or restrict any economic,
financial, political or other secular activity, which may be linked with religious practice and
also to provide for social welfare and reforms. The protection of Articles 25 and 26 extends
to acts done in pursuance of religion and, therefore, contains a guarantee for ritual and
observations, ceremonies and modes of worship, which are the integral parts of religion.
Uniform Civil Code is not against secularism nor does it violate Article 25 and 26 of the
Constitution. It is just that the Article 44 is based on the concept that there is no obvious link
between religion and personal law in a civilized society. Marriage, succession etc. are matters
of a secular nature and, therefore they cannot be chained down by the laws.

No religion permits deliberate distortion. Implementation of Uniform Civil Code will not and
shall not result in interference of one’s religious beliefs relating, mainly to maintenance,
succession and inheritance. The debate for the UCC, with its diverse implications and
concerning secularism in the country, leads to one of the most controversial issues in 21st
century.

UCC AND ROLE OF JUDICIARY

In the post-colonial India, the role of Judiciary in the implementation of uniform civil code is
very appreciable. In fact it is the judiciary, which through its interpretations paved the way
towards uniform civil code. For the very first time in the case of Mohd Ahmed Khan vs.
Shah Bano Begum7 pertaining to the liability of a Muslim husband to maintain his divorced
wife beyond iddat period, who is not able to maintain herself, the Supreme Court held that
Section 125 Cr. P. C which imposes such obligation on all the husbands is secular in
character and is applicable to all religions.

7
AIR 1985 SC 945

6
In Ms. Jordan Deigndeh vs. S.S. Chopra8 , D Chinappa Reddy, J. speaking for the court
referred to the observations of Chandrachud, C.J. in Shah Bano’s case and observed as under:
“The present case is yet another event which focuses on the immediate and compulsive need
for a uniform civil code. The totally unsatisfactory state of affairs consequent on the lack of
uniform civil code is exposed by the facts of the present case.

In the case of Mrs. Zohra Khatoon v. Mohd. Ibrahim 9, A substantial question of law was
raised and the High Court of Allahabad which cancelled the orders of the maintenance
allowance passed by the Magistrate on the grounds the when the divorced proceedings start
from the female side under the dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act 1939, in those cases wife
cannot claim maintenance from her former husband neither under the Muslim law nor under
Sec. 125 of Cr.P.C. Ultimately the Supreme Court overruled the decision of the High court on
the ground that it is based on the wrong interpretation of the Clause1(b) of the explanation to
section 125 under this clause the wife continues to be wife even though she has been divorced
her husband or has otherwise obtained divorce and has not remarried.

Similarly in the case of Sarla Mudgil v. Union of India10, J. Kuldip Singh also put emphasis
on the need of uniform civil code and judgment delivered by him is again a step towards
uniform civil code. In this case the Supreme Court held that conversion of a Hindu male to
Islam only for the purpose Of contracting bigamous circumvents Section 494 of Indian Penal
Code. Such marriages have been declared as bigamous and void by the court. The court after
referring to various precedents on the point, categorically held that till uniform civil code is
achieved for all the Indian Citizens, there would be an inducement to a Hindu husband who
wants to enter in to second marriage while the first marriage is subsisting to become a
Muslim. Here the Court was pointing out the injustice done to the first wife, legally wedded.

The Judges of various High Courts and Supreme Court became the main instrument for
bringing important gradual legal developments which also put its impact on the question Of
uniform civil code.

NEED FOR UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IN INDIA

The need for uniform civil code has been felt for more than a century. India as a country has
already suffered a lot in the absence of a Uniform Civil Code .The society has been
fragmented in the name of religions, sects and sex. Even at present, in India, there are
8
1985 AIR 935, 1985 SCR Supl. (1) 704
9
AIR 1981 SC 1243
10
(1995) 3 SCC 635

7
different laws governing rights related to personal matters or laws like marriage, divorce,
maintenance, adoption and inheritance for different communities. The laws governing
inheritance or divorce among Hindus are thus, very different from those pertaining to
Muslims or Christians and so on. In India, most family law is determined by the religion of
the parties concerned Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists come under Hindu law, whereas
Muslims and Christians have their own laws. Muslim law is based on the Shariat; in all other
communities, laws are codified by an Act of the Indian parliament. There are other sets of
laws to deal with criminal and civil cases, such as the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973and the
Indian Penal Code, 1862. The multifarious castes and creeds and their sets of beliefs or
practices are bewilderingly confusing and nowhere is a scenario like in India, of various
personal laws jostling together is allowed.11

The demand for a uniform civil code essentially means unifying all these personal laws to
have one set of secular laws dealing with these aspects that will apply to all citizens of India
irrespective of the community they belong to. Though the exact contours of such a uniform
code have not been spelt out, it should presumably incorporate the most modern and
progressive aspects of all existing personal laws while discarding those which are retrograde.

India has set before itself the ideal of a secular society and in that context achievement of a
uniform civil code becomes more desirable. Such a code will do away with diversity in
matrimonial laws, simplify the Indian legal system and make Indian society more
homogeneous. It will de-link law from religion which is a very desirable objective to achieve
in a secular and socialist pattern of society. It will create a national identity and will help in
containing fissiparous tendencies in the country .The uniform civil code will contain uniform
provisions applicable to everyone and based on social justice and gender equality in family
matters.

According to the Committee on the Status of Women in India, "The continuance of various
personal laws which accept discrimination between men and women violate the fundamental
rights and the Preamble to the Constitution which promises to secure to all citizens "equality
of status, and is against the spirit of natural integration". The Committee recommended
expeditious implementation of the constitutional directive in Article 44 by adopting a
Uniform Civil Code.12
11
Available at http://www.ijesls.com/Need%20for%20Uniform%20Civil%20Code-%20Milind%20Gaur.pdf,
(last visited on 7th July, 2016)
12
Towards equality: Report of the Committee on the status of Women in India(New Delhi: Government of
India, Ministry of Social and Educational Welfare, Department of Social Welfare, 1974)

8
Goa has shown the way and there is absolutely no reason for delay. A secular India needs a
uniform civil code. To mark time is to march with the communalists.

CODIFICATION

The biggest and the most prominent obstacle in implementing the UCC, apart from obtaining
a consensus, is the drafting. There is a lot of literature churned out on UCC but there is no
model law drafted. General view of the people is that under the guise of UCC, the Hindu law
will be imposed on all. And by far the possibility of UCC being only a repackaged Hindu law
was ruled out by Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee(Prime Minister at that time) when he said that
there will be a new code based on gender equality and comprising the best elements in all the
personal laws. The UCC should carve a balance between protection of fundamental rights and
religious dogmas of individuals. It should be a code, which is just and proper according to a
man of ordinary prudence, without any bias with regards to religious or political
considerations.
A Bill on voluntary Uniform Civil Code is almost ready for introduction in the session of
Parliament. A voluntary uniform civil code is a contradiction in terms. The moment it is
made optional it ceased to be uniform. Any attempt to make the code voluntary or optional
must be opposed. Instead of framing such optional civil code, the government would do well
to take immediate steps to codify each set of personal laws incorporating therein the requisite
reforms making them uniformly applicable to all the members of the concerned community.

There is a great possibility of the UCC being abused, but this should not eschew the
Parliament from enacting the UCC; the social welfare and benefits resulting from the
implementation of UCC are far greater.13

UCC: GENDER JUSTICE

Women empowerment in the major areas like social status, gender bias, health, security and
empowerment are of urgent necessity. The Indian state has in fact encouraged codifying tribal
customary laws. Article 44 expects from the State to secure a Uniform Civil Code for all
citizens of India. There is no Uniform Civil Code in India but a Uniform Criminal Code
exists. The Criminal law is equally applicable to all citizens irrespective of their religious
affiliation. However in the case of civil law particularly in the matter of personal laws there is
no uniformity. In Mohammad Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, popularly known as
13
Available at http://www.ijesls.com/Need%20for%20Uniform%20Civil%20Code-%20Milind%20Gaur.pdf ,
(last visited on 11th July, 2016)

9
Shah Bano’s case, the Supreme Court held that “It is also a matter of regret that Article 44 of
our Constitution has remained a dead letter.” Though this decision was highly criticized by
Muslim Fundamentalists, yet it was considered as a liberal interpretation of law as required
by gender justice. However, in Ahmadabad Women’s Action Group (AWAG) v. Union of
India14, a PIL was filed challenging gender discriminatory provisions in Hindu, Muslim and
Christian statutory and non-statutory law. This time Supreme Court became a bit reserved
and held that the matter of removal of gender discrimination in personal laws “involves issues
of State polices with which the court will not ordinarily have any concern.” The decision was
criticized that the apex court had virtually abdicated its role as a sentinel in protecting the
principles of equality regarding gender related issues of personal laws of various
communities in India.

The Apex Court pursued the same line in Lily Thomas etc. v. Union of India 15 and others
and held, “The desirability of Uniform Civil Code can hardly be doubted. But it can
concretize only when social climate is properly built up by elite of the society, statesmen
amongst leaders who instead of gaining personal mileage rise above and awaken the masses
to accept the change.”

The judiciary in India has taken note of the injustice done to the women in the matters of
many personal laws. It has been voicing its concern through a number of judgments
indicating the necessity to have uniformity in personal matters of all the citizens.

It is in this context that we need to understand the issue of the uniform civil code. The time
has come to place personal laws of all religions under a scanner and reject those laws that
violate the Constitution. Personal laws of all religions discriminate against women on matters
of marriage, divorce, inheritance and so on. There is an urgent need to cull out the just and
equitable laws of all religions and form a blueprint for a uniform civil code based on gender
justice. The Hindu code cannot be applied uniformly to all religions. On the other hand, triple
talaq would have to go, as would polygamy and all the advantages that accrue to Hindu
undivided families in matters of property and inheritance.16

CONCLUSION

A Uniform Civil Code sets the precedent for attaining true equality and egalitarianism. It will
help in integrating India more than it has ever been since independence. Bringing in UCC
14
AIR 1997 SC 3614.
15
AIR 2000 SC 1650, at 668
16
Shabana Azmi, Women, Stand Up For Your Rights, The Times of India, 7 July 2005

10
cannot be a knee-jerk step but implementation of India's secularism could be made by
enacting personal laws outside the purview of religion Different personal laws for various
communities creates unnecessary burden on the legal system. Bringing a Uniform Civil code
would reduce that. It will also address all the loopholes present in different personal laws.
Uniform Civil code is also a major step towards gender justice especially for Muslim women.
Most of the personal laws have bias against rights of women, whereas, bias is not only
against women but also operates against men. If all Indians have same laws governing them,
then the politicians will have no chance of exploiting any community in exchange of their
votes. It will not only raise the bar of the legal system but also help in the progress of India as
a nation.

The UCC is necessary because personal laws are inconsistent with our declaration "To
constitute India into Socialist Secular Democratic Republic" and it is almost impossible to
achieve the golden goals as set out in the Preamble of the Constitution without the UCC. The
Government should draft a Common Civil Code with the opinion of Law Commission,
National Human Right Commission, and National Commission for Women, Former Attorney
Generals, Solicitor Generals and Judges of the Supreme Court and must implement the UCC
in spirit of the Article-44 of the Constitution on priority. While our economic growth has
been the highest in the world, our social growth has not happened at all. Socially and
culturally, we have degraded to a point where we are neither modern nor traditional. Bringing
the UCC would reduce and help in simplifying many technicalities and loopholes, present in
existing personal laws. The concept of one nation, one law is more than a neat hashtag and
goes back to the drafting of the Constitution. Every modern nation has it, and it is time that
we have it too and achieve the grand vision which was envisioned at the time of framing our
constitution.

11