0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views8 pages

Bounded Linear Operators On Function Spaces and Sequences Spaces

This document discusses bounded linear operators on function and sequence spaces. It begins by defining vector spaces, normed spaces, and linear operators. It then proves that sequence spaces lp(R) with p≠2 and function spaces C[a,b] are not inner product spaces using properties of parallelograms. The document defines bounded linear operators and proves some properties, including that the left shift operator on lp(R) is bounded. It provides an example that the right shift operator on l2(R) is linear and bounded. In summary, the document analyzes linear operators on function and sequence spaces and proves some of their properties.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views8 pages

Bounded Linear Operators On Function Spaces and Sequences Spaces

This document discusses bounded linear operators on function and sequence spaces. It begins by defining vector spaces, normed spaces, and linear operators. It then proves that sequence spaces lp(R) with p≠2 and function spaces C[a,b] are not inner product spaces using properties of parallelograms. The document defines bounded linear operators and proves some properties, including that the left shift operator on lp(R) is bounded. It provides an example that the right shift operator on l2(R) is linear and bounded. In summary, the document analyzes linear operators on function and sequence spaces and proves some of their properties.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 8

Volume 8, Issue 2, February – 2023 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165

Bounded Linear Operators on Function Spaces


and Sequences Spaces
Muhammad Zakir1
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences,
Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
AMS subject classification: 11R52, 42C40.

Abstract. This paper will analyse the existence of sequence operator and prove its properties and give some examples
space and function space.It will be proved that these two related to the problem.
spaces form a normed space in general and an inner
product space in particular.Similarly, the space of linear Keywords:- Linear operators, bounded operators, sequence
operators will be introduced. Next, we will define the finite spaces, integrable function spaces.

I. INTRODUCTION

Vector space is the most important part of Functional Analysis.In this paper the vector space is clearly defined [1, 6].
Furthermore, a vector space that has a norm function in it is called a norm space [2,5,7]. As for the clearly defined finite linear
operator [3,4,5].

 Definition 1.1 [1]Suppose 𝑉be a vector space over the field F. Define a real function as follows :

‖ .‖ ∶ 𝑉 × 𝑉 ⟶ ℝ

Who fulfils :

‖𝑥‖ ≥ 0

‖𝑥‖ = 0 ⟺ 𝑥 = 0

‖𝛼 𝑥‖ = |𝛼|‖𝑥‖

‖𝑥 + 𝑦 ‖ ≤ ‖𝑥‖ + ‖𝑦 ‖

Shared vector space with norms function‖ . ‖is called a normed space denoted by(𝑉, ‖ . ‖).

 Definition 1.2: [5]Suppose 𝑉 and 𝑊be are vector spaces a mapping 𝑇 from the vector space 𝑉 to the vector space 𝑌
satisfies𝑇 (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 𝑇(𝑥) + 𝑇(𝑦)and𝑇(𝛼𝑥) = 𝛼𝑇(𝑥)for each𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉and𝛼 ∈ 𝐹. 𝑇 is called a linear operator.

 Definition 1.2 [1]Suppose 𝑉 and 𝑊be are vector spaces. A mapping 𝑇 from the norm space 𝑉 to the vector space 𝑌 is called a
bounded linear mapping if there exists 𝑐 ∈ 𝐹 such that it satisfies‖𝑇(𝑥)‖ ≤ 𝑐‖𝑥‖for each𝑥 ∈ 𝑉

 Definition 1.3 [5]Suppose 𝑉 and 𝑊be are vector spaces.

 DefineΒ(𝑈, 𝑉) = {𝑇 | 𝑇 ∶ 𝑈 ⟶ 𝑉, 𝑇 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟}. Further it can be proved that 𝐵(𝑈, 𝑉) is a vector space. Further it can be
proved that 𝐵(𝑈, 𝑉) is a vector space.

 Definition 1.4 [2,6]Suppose (𝑥𝑛 )be a sequence on the space ofℝ.

Define the sequence space:



𝒑 (ℝ) ∑|𝑥𝑛 |𝑝 < ∞}
𝓵 = {(𝑥𝑛 ) ⊆ ℝ|
𝑛=1

Furthermore, it can be proven that𝓵𝒑 (ℝ)is a vector space. Apart from that, the norm can also be defined:
1
∞ 𝑝
‖𝑥‖𝓵𝒑 = (∑|𝑥𝑛 |𝑝 )
𝑛=1

IJISRT23FEB1245 www.ijisrt.com 1985


Volume 8, Issue 2, February – 2023 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
More specific to𝒑 = 2, maka ruang 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ)is an inner product space with inner product defined :

〈𝑥𝑛 , 𝑦𝑛 〉 = ∑|𝑥𝑛 𝑦𝑛 |2
𝑛=1

Theorem 1.1[5]Any space𝓵𝒑 (ℝ)with𝑝 ≠ 2 , is not an inner product space.

Proof. Using the properties of parallelograms, select𝑥 = (1,1,0,0,0 … , ) ∈ 𝓵𝒑 (ℝ)and𝑦 = (1, −1, 0, 0, 0, … , ) ∈ 𝓵𝒑 (ℝ)then
obtained:
1
‖𝑥‖ = ‖𝑦 ‖ = 2𝑝 𝑑𝑎𝑛 ‖𝑥 + 𝑦 ‖ = ‖𝑥 − 𝑦 ‖ = 2

It appears that the equation holds𝑝 = 2∎

Theorem 1.2 [5]Any space𝑪[𝒂, 𝒃]is not an inner product space.

Proof. Suppose‖𝑥‖ = max |𝑥(𝑡)|is the norm on the space𝑪[𝒂, 𝒃]. This theorem can be proved using parallelogram theory.
𝑡 ∈[𝑎,𝑏]
𝑡−𝑎
Suppose it is determined that𝑥(𝑡) = 1, 𝑦(𝑡) = 𝑏−𝑎then‖𝑥‖ = 1and‖𝑦 ‖ = 1so that it is obtained:

𝑡−𝑎
𝒙(𝑡) + 𝑦(𝑡) = 1 +
𝑏−𝑎
𝑡−𝑎
𝒙(𝑡) − 𝑦(𝑡) = 1 −
𝑏−𝑎
so that it is obtained:
‖𝑥 + 𝑦 ‖ = 2 , ‖𝑥 − 𝑦 ‖ = 1and‖𝑥 + 𝑦 ‖2 + ‖𝑥 − 𝑦 ‖2 = 5even though2(‖𝑥‖2 + ‖𝑦‖2 ) = 4.

∎ Definition 1.5 [3,7]Suppose [𝑎, 𝑏] ⊆ ℝand𝑓 ∶ [𝑎, 𝑏] ⟶ ℝ is a real function onℝ .Defined
𝑏

𝑳𝒑 ([𝑎, 𝑏]) = { 𝑓 | ∫|𝑓(𝑥)|𝑝 𝑑𝑥 < ∞ }


𝑎

Furthermore, it can be proven that𝑳𝒑 ([𝑎, 𝑏])is a norm space, with norm:
1
𝑏 𝑝

‖𝑓‖𝑳𝒑 = (∫|𝑓(𝑥)|𝑝 𝑑𝑥 )
𝑎

More specific to𝒑 = 2, then the space𝑳𝟐 (ℝ)is an inner product space with inner product defined :
1
𝑏 2

〈𝑓(𝑥), 𝑔(𝑥)〉 = (∫ 𝑓(𝑥)𝑔(𝑥) 𝑑𝑥 )


𝑎

II. RESULTS

In this section, the results of this research will be described, namely by proving some properties of finite linear mappings on
a normed space and on the inner product space..

Theorem 2.1. Suppuse𝓵𝒑 (ℝ)beis a normed space with norm defined as follows:

‖𝑥‖ = ∑|𝑥𝑛 |𝑝
𝑛=1

Then there is a linear mapping shift left𝑓which is bounded.

Proof. Suppose𝑓 ∶ 𝓵𝒑 (ℝ) ⟶ 𝓵𝒑 (ℝ), bewith the linkage defined:

IJISRT23FEB1245 www.ijisrt.com 1986


Volume 8, Issue 2, February – 2023 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , … ) ↦ 𝑓(𝑥) = (𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , 𝑥5 , … ).It will be shown that 𝑓 is a linear mapping.Let's take an arbitrary𝑥, 𝑦 ∈
𝓵𝒑 (ℝ)and𝛼, 𝛽 ∈ ℝ, write down𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , … )and𝑦 = (𝑦1, 𝑦2, 𝑦3 , 𝑦4 , … )notice that:

𝑓(𝛼𝑥 + 𝛽𝑦) = 𝑓(𝛼𝑥1 + 𝛽𝑦1 ), (𝛼𝑥2 + 𝛽𝑦2), … ) = (0, 𝛼𝑥2 , 𝛼𝑥3 , … ) + (0, 𝛽𝑦2 , 𝛽𝑦3, … )
𝛼𝑓(𝑥) + 𝛽𝑓(𝑦)

Means 𝑓 is linear.

For an arbitrary vector𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , … ) ∈ 𝓵𝒑 (ℝ)apply:


‖𝑓(𝑥)‖𝑝 = ‖(𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , 𝑥5 , … )‖𝑝

= ∑|𝑥𝑛 |𝑝
𝑛=1

≤ ∑|𝑥𝑛 |𝑝
𝑛=1

= ‖𝑥‖𝑝

So obtained‖𝑓(𝑥)‖ ≤ ‖𝑥‖ , ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝓵𝒑 (ℝ), means 𝑓 is bounded. Furthermore, without prejudice to the generality of
writing‖𝑓‖ ≤ 1 … … . … … … … … … … …. (1)

Meanwhile, the vectors𝑒 = (0,1,00, … ) ∈ 𝓵𝒑 (ℝ).It is clear that‖𝑒‖ = 1and‖𝑓(𝑒)‖ = ‖(1,0,0,0, … )‖ = 1thus
obtained‖𝑓‖ = 𝑠𝑢𝑝 ‖𝑓(𝑥)‖ ≥ 1…………….………..(2)
‖𝑥‖=1

From equations (1) and (2), it is concluded that‖𝑓‖ = 1∎

Example 2.1. Suppose𝐻 = 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ)be. If 𝑯 is a Hilbert space then the right shift mapping is a linear and bounded mapping.

Proof. Suppose𝑓 ∶ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ) ⟶ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ)with the attribution defined :

𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , … ) ↦ 𝑓(𝑥) = (0, 𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , 𝑥5 , … ). For an arbitrary𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , … ) ∈ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ)apply:


‖𝑓(𝑥)‖2 = ‖(0, 𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , 𝑥5 , … )‖2

= ∑|𝑥𝑛 |2
𝑛=1

≤ ∑|𝑥𝑛 |2
𝑛=1

= ‖𝑥‖2

So it is obtained‖𝑓(𝑥)‖ ≤ ‖𝑥‖ , ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ), means f is bounded.

Example 2.2. Suppose𝐻 = 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ).If 𝐻 is a Hilbert space then the left shift mapping is a linear and bounded mapping.

Proof. It will be shown f is a linear mapping. Take any𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ)and𝛼, 𝛽 ∈ ℝ, write 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , … )and𝑦 =
(𝑦1 , 𝑦2, 𝑦3, 𝑦4 , … )and realise that:

𝑓(𝛼𝑥 + 𝛽𝑦) = 𝑓(𝛼𝑥1 + 𝛽𝑦1 ), (𝛼𝑥2 + 𝛽𝑦2 ), … )

= (0, 𝛼𝑥2 , 𝛼𝑥3 , … ) + (0, 𝛽𝑦2 , 𝛽𝑦3, … )

= 𝛼𝑓(𝑥) + 𝛽𝑓(𝑦)

This proves that 𝑓 is linear. Next suppose𝑓 ∶ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ) ⟶ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ)with the attribution defined :

𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , … ) ↦ 𝑓(𝑥) = (𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , 𝑥5 , … ). For an arbitrary vector𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , … ) ∈ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ)apply:

IJISRT23FEB1245 www.ijisrt.com 1987


Volume 8, Issue 2, February – 2023 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

‖𝑓(𝑥)‖2 = ‖(𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , 𝑥5 , … )‖2


= ∑|𝑥𝑛 |2
𝑛=1


∑|𝑥𝑛 |2 = ‖𝑥‖2
𝑛=1

So it is obtained‖𝑓(𝑥)‖ ≤ ‖𝑥‖ , ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ), means 𝑓 is bounded. Furthermore, without prejudice to the generality of
writing‖𝑓‖ ≤ 1 … … … … … … … … … .. (1)

Meanwhile, the vector𝑒 = (0,1,00, … ) ∈ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ).It is clear that‖𝑒‖ = 1and‖𝑓(𝑒)‖ = ‖(1,0,0,0, … )‖ = 1thus
obtained‖𝑓‖ = 𝑠𝑢𝑝 ‖𝑓(𝑥)‖ ≥ 1 ……………...………..(2)
‖𝑥‖=1

From equations (1) and (2) it can be deduced‖𝑓‖ = 1∎

Example 2.3. Suppose𝐻 = 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ)be,If 𝐻 is a Hilbert space then the right shift mapping is a linear and bounded mapping.
Proof. Suppose𝑓 ∶ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ) ⟶ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ)with the attribution defined:

𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , … ) ↦ 𝑓(𝑥) = (0, 𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , 𝑥5 , … ). For an arbitrary𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , … ) ∈ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ)apply :

‖𝑓(𝑥)‖2 = ‖(0, 𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 , 𝑥4 , 𝑥5 , … )‖2


= ∑|𝑥𝑛 |2
𝑛=1

≤ ∑|𝑥𝑛 |2
𝑛=1

= ‖𝑥‖2

So obtained‖𝑓(𝑥)‖ ≤ ‖𝑥‖ , ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ), means 𝑓 is bounded. Furthermore, without prejudice to the generality of
writing‖𝑓‖ ≤ 1 … … … … … … … … … … … … …. (1)

Meanwhile, the vector𝑒 = (1,0,00, … ) ∈ 𝓵𝟐 (ℝ).It is clear that‖𝑒‖ = 1and‖𝑓(𝑒)‖ = ‖(0, 1,0,0,0, … )‖ = 1so that it is
obtained‖𝑓‖ = 𝑠𝑢𝑝 ‖𝑓(𝑥)‖ ≥ 1 ……..………..(2)
‖𝑥‖=1

From equations (1) and (2) it can be deduced‖𝑓‖ = 1∎

Theorem 2.2. Given two norm spaces(𝑋, ‖ ∙ ‖1 )and(𝑌, ‖ ∙ ‖2 ).Suppose 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵(𝑋, 𝑌) 𝑏𝑒, defined
‖𝑇‖ = 𝑖𝑛𝑓 { 𝑀 ∶ ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2 ≤ 𝑀 ‖𝑥‖1 }then
𝑥 ∈𝑋

‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2
‖𝑇‖ = sup
𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 , 𝑥 ≠0 ‖𝑥‖1

And

‖𝑇‖ = sup ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2


‖𝑥‖1 < 1

Proof. Note that the :


‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2
≤ 𝑀, ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, with 𝑥 ≠ 0
‖𝑥‖1

From the definition obtained :

IJISRT23FEB1245 www.ijisrt.com 1988


Volume 8, Issue 2, February – 2023 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

‖𝑇‖ = 𝑖𝑛𝑓{𝑀 ∶ ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2 ≤ 𝑀 ‖𝑥‖1 }


𝑥∈𝑋
‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2
= sup (1)
𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 , 𝑥 ≠0 ‖𝑥‖1
𝒙
Now suppose that𝑦 = ‖𝒙‖𝟏
for∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑥 ≠ 0its accuracy is obtained𝑦 ∈ 𝑋and‖𝑦 ‖ = 1. From equation (1) is obtained:

‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2
‖𝑇‖ = sup
𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 , 𝑥 ≠0 ‖𝑥‖1

‖𝑥‖1 𝑦
= sup ‖𝑇 ( )‖
‖𝑦‖=1 ‖𝑥‖1
2

= sup ‖𝑇(𝑦)‖2
‖𝑦‖=1

= sup ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2 … … … … … … . . … . (2)


‖𝑥‖=1

From equation (2) is obtained :

‖𝑇‖ = sup ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2


‖𝑥‖1

≤ sup ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2
‖𝑥‖1

‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2
≤ sup
𝑥 ∈𝑋, ‖𝑥‖1 ≤ 1 ‖𝑥‖1

‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2
≤ sup
𝑥∈𝑋, 𝑥 ≠0 ‖𝑥‖1

= ‖𝑇‖

then‖𝑇‖ = sup ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2


‖𝑥‖1 ≤ 1

Furthermore, suppose that, 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∶ ‖𝑥‖1 ≤ 1}and𝐴0 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∶ ‖𝑥‖1 < 1}, because it is recognised
that‖𝑇‖ = sup ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2then there is a sequence(𝑥𝑛 ) ∈ 𝐴so that:
𝑥 ∈𝐴

‖𝑇‖ = lim ‖𝑇(𝑥𝑛 )‖2


𝑛→ ∞

1
Note that the sequence(𝑦𝑛 )with𝑦𝑛 = (1 − ) 𝑥𝑛 .It is clear that𝑦𝑛 ∈ 𝐴0 , such that for all𝑛 ∈ ℕapply
2𝑛

1
lim ‖𝑇(𝑥𝑛 )‖2 = lim ‖𝑇 (1 − )𝑥 ‖
𝑛→ ∞ 𝑛→ ∞ 2𝑛 𝑛 2
1
= lim 𝑇 (1 − ) 𝑥 ‖𝑇(𝑥𝑛 )‖2
𝑛→ ∞ 2𝑛 𝑛
1
= lim (1 − ) lim ‖𝑇(𝑥𝑛 )‖2
𝑛→ ∞ 2𝑛 𝑛→ ∞
= ‖𝑇‖

Therefore:

sup ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2 ≥ ‖𝑇‖


𝑥 ∈ 𝐴0

on the other hand sup ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2 ≤ sup ‖𝑇(𝑥)‖2


𝑥 ∈ 𝐴0 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴

IJISRT23FEB1245 www.ijisrt.com 1989


Volume 8, Issue 2, February – 2023 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

= ‖𝑇‖∎

 Exsamle 2.3. Suppose it is known that the space𝑋 = 𝐶[0,1],with the maximum norm. . The integral operator is defined as
follows : 𝜑 ∶ 𝐶[0,1] ⟶ 𝐶[0,1]with :
1

𝜑𝑓(𝑥) = ∫ 𝑓(𝑦) 𝑑𝑦
0

Then 𝜑 is bounded.

Proof. Note that the:


𝑥

‖𝜑 𝑓‖ ≤ max ∫|𝑓(𝑦)| 𝑑𝑦
𝑥 ∈[0,1]
0

≤ ∫|𝑓(𝑦)| 𝑑𝑦
0

≤ ‖𝑓‖

Because‖𝜑‖ ≤ 1, and1 ∈ 𝑋, 𝜑 1 = 𝑥then‖𝜑 1‖ = 1. ∎

Exsamle 2.4.Suppose𝑳2 [0,1], bewith norms‖𝑥‖2 . Define the integral operator:


𝑥
2 [0,1] 2 [0,1]
𝜑 ∶ 𝑳 ⟶ 𝑳 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝜑𝑓(𝑥) = ∫ 𝑓(𝑦) 𝑑𝑦
0
Then 𝜑 is bounded.

Proof.
1 𝑡 2

‖𝜑𝑓‖22 = ∫ |∫ 𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠| 𝑑𝑡
0 0

2
1 𝑡
𝜋𝑠 𝑓(𝑠)
= ∫ ||∫ √cos 𝑑𝑠 || 𝑑𝑡
2 𝜋𝑠
0 0 √cos 2

1 𝑡 𝑡
𝜋𝑠 |𝑓(𝑠)|2
≤ ∫ (∫ cos 𝑑𝑠 ∫ 𝜋𝑠 𝑑𝑠) 𝑑𝑡
2 cos 2
0 0 0

1 𝑡
2 𝜋𝑡 |𝑓(𝑠)|2
= ∫ (∫ sin ∙ 𝜋𝑠 𝑑𝑠) 𝑑𝑡
𝜋 2 cos 2
0 0

1 𝑡
2 𝜋𝑡 |𝑓(𝑠)|2
= ∫ (∫ sin ∙ 𝜋𝑠 𝑑𝑡) 𝑑𝑠
𝜋 2 cos
0 0 2

𝑡 1
2 𝜋𝑡 |𝑓(𝑠)|2
= ∫ (∫ sin 𝑑𝑡 ) 𝜋𝑠 𝑑𝑠
𝜋 2 cos
0 0 2

IJISRT23FEB1245 www.ijisrt.com 1990


Volume 8, Issue 2, February – 2023 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
𝑡
2 2 |𝑓(𝑠)|2
= ( ) ∫ 𝜋𝑠 𝑑𝑠
𝜋 cos
0 2

𝜋𝑠
This is the case when𝑓(𝑠) = cos
2

Theorem 2.5An inner productive space satisfies the Schwarz inequality and the triangle inequality, namely:

|〈𝑥, 𝑦 〉| ≤ ‖𝑥‖‖𝑦 ‖ (Schwarz's inequality)

‖𝑥 + 𝑦 ‖ ≤ ‖𝑥‖ + ‖𝑦 ‖ (triangle inequality)

Proof. In part 𝑎) it is easy to prove the bilan vector{𝑥, 𝑦}linearly dependent i.e. suppose𝑦 = 𝑡𝑥means it can be written
as|〈𝑥, 𝑦 〉| ≤

‖𝑥‖‖𝑦 ‖ ⇔ |〈𝑥, 𝑡𝑥〉| ≤ ‖𝑥‖‖𝑡𝑥‖

⇔ |𝑡 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉| ≤ 𝑡‖𝑥‖‖𝑥‖

⇔ |𝑡 |‖𝑥‖2 ≤ 𝑡 ‖𝑥‖2

Furthermore, if{𝑥, 𝑦}is linearly independent then : if𝑦 = 0then0 = |〈𝑥, 0〉| ≤ ‖𝑥‖‖0‖ = 0then it is proven. Now if𝑦 ≠ 0.
Suppose for any scalar𝒕 , note that : 0 ≤ ‖𝑥 − 𝑡𝑦‖2 = 〈𝑥 − 𝑡𝑦, 𝑥 − 𝑡𝑦 〉

= 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉 − 𝑡̅〈𝑥, 𝑦 〉 − 𝑡[〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 − 𝑡̅〈𝑦, 𝑦 〉]


〈𝑦, 𝑥〉
by choosing𝑡̅ =
〈𝑦, 𝑦 〉
then obtained :
〈𝑦, 𝑥〉
0 ≤ 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉 − 〈𝑥, 𝑦 〉
〈𝑦, 𝑦 〉

|〈𝑥, 𝑦 〉|2
= ‖𝑥‖2 −
‖𝑦 ‖2

Because of this〈𝑥, 𝑦 〉 = ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅


〈𝑦, 𝑥〉then by multiplying it with‖𝑦 ‖2then the above equation is proven. ∎

For part 𝑏). Note that:

‖𝑥 + 𝑦 ‖2 = 〈𝑥 + 𝑦, 𝑥 + 𝑦 〉

= ‖𝑥‖2 + 〈𝑥, 𝑦 〉 + 〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 + ‖𝑦 ‖2

From equation 𝑎) is obtained :

|〈𝑥, 𝑦 〉| = |〈𝑦, 𝑥〉| ≤ ‖𝑥‖‖𝑦 ‖

Furthermore, from

‖𝑥 + 𝑦 ‖2 = 〈𝑥 + 𝑦, 𝑥 + 𝑦 〉

= ‖𝑥‖2 + 〈𝑥, 𝑦 〉 + 〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 + ‖𝑦 ‖2

≤ ‖𝑥‖2 + 2|𝑥, 𝑦 | + ‖𝑦 ‖2

= (‖𝑥‖ + ‖𝑦 ‖)2
So it is proven∎

III. CONCLUSION product spaces and satisfy the Schwarz inequality and triangle
inequality.
From the description it can be concluded that in the
space of sequence𝓵𝒑 (ℝ)can be constructed a bounded linear
operator as well as in the space of functions𝑳𝒑 (ℝ). In ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
particular for 𝑝 = 2 it can be shown that both spaces are inner

IJISRT23FEB1245 www.ijisrt.com 1991


Volume 8, Issue 2, February – 2023 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
The author would like to express his gratitude to his [7.] Zakir M, Eridani, and Fatmawati, 2018, Expantion of
colleagues in the Department of Mathematics who are Ceva Theorem in the NormedSpace with the angle of
members of the ANALYSIS Group and Analysis Lab, Wilson, International Journalof Science and Research,
Hasanuddin University. Vol7, No.1, 912–914.

REFERENCES

[1.] Anton H, 2019, Elementary Linear Algebra, 12rd


Edition, John Wiley & Sons.
[2.] Bower A and Kalton N.J, 2014, An Introductory Course
in Fungtional Analysis, Springer-Verlag
[3.] Brown A.L and Page A, 1970, Elements Of Fungtional
Analysis, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company London
[4.] Bottema O, 2008, Topics in Elementary Geometry, 2rd
Edition, Springer ScienceBusines Media, LLC.
[5.] Kreyszig E, 1978, Introductory Fungtional Analysis
With Application, 2rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc
[6.] Roman S, 1992, Advanced Linear Algebra, Springer-
Verlag

IJISRT23FEB1245 www.ijisrt.com 1992

You might also like