0% found this document useful (0 votes)
316 views4 pages

Performance Task in Statistics and Probability

This document summarizes a performance task involving hypothesis testing using ANOVA to analyze the hours spent playing online games by three sections: Alcaraz, Tesla, and Zara. The null hypothesis is that the means of hours spent for each section are equal, while the alternative hypothesis is that they are not equal. The critical F-value is calculated and compared to the computed F-value from the data. Since the computed F-value is greater than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected, meaning there is a significant difference between the sections in hours spent playing online games.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
316 views4 pages

Performance Task in Statistics and Probability

This document summarizes a performance task involving hypothesis testing using ANOVA to analyze the hours spent playing online games by three sections: Alcaraz, Tesla, and Zara. The null hypothesis is that the means of hours spent for each section are equal, while the alternative hypothesis is that they are not equal. The critical F-value is calculated and compared to the computed F-value from the data. Since the computed F-value is greater than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected, meaning there is a significant difference between the sections in hours spent playing online games.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 4

Performance Task in

Statistics and Probability

Topic: Hours spent in playing online games.


Hypothesis Testing Method: ANOVA
Given the hours spent in playing online games of the three (3) section, Alcaraz, Tesla,
and Zara, is there a significant difference between the performance of the three section?

Section of Alcaraz (1) Section of Tesla (2) Section of Zara (3)


2 4 4
2 4 4
2 4 3
1 5 2
3 3 2

Step by step process:

1. Formulate the hypothesis

H0: μ1 = μ2 = μ3

μ1 = S1
μ2 = S2
μ3 = S3

2. Determine the Alpha

α = 0.05

3. Finding the Critical F-Value

Fcrit = 3.89
α dfbet dfw/n
dfbetween = k - 1
0.05 dfwithin = N - k
k = number of columns N = total number of observations
k=3 N = 15
dfbet = 3-1 dfw/n = 15-3
dfbet = 2 dfw/n = 12

4. Compute for the Computed F-Value

Fcomp = 7.5
(x - x̿) ²  (xn - x̅n) ² 
Section of Alcaraz (1)
2 1 0
2 1 0
2 1 0
1 4 1
3 0 1
x̅a = 2
Section of Tesla (2)
4 1 0
4 1 0
4 1 0
5 4 1
3 0 1
x̅t = 4
Section of Zara (3)
4 1 1
4 1 1
3 0 0
2 1 1
2 1 1
x̅z = 3
GRAND MEAN SStotal = 18
x̿ = 3

dfbet = 2 SSbet = 10 MSbet = 10/2 = 5


dfw/n = 12 SSw/n = 8 MSw/n = 8/12 = 2/3 or 0.66666666667
SStotal = 18
Fcomp = 5/0.66666666667 = 7.5

5. Compare Fcrit-value and Fcomp-value

Fcrit Fcomp
3.89 < 7.5

6. Conclusion

Accept the alternative hypothesis and reject the null hypothesis.

There is no significant difference in the performance of the 3 sections.

You might also like