Robert 2010
Robert 2010
Original article
Encapsulation of polyphenols and anthocyanins from pomegranate
(Punica granatum) by spray drying
Paz Robert,1* Tamara Gorena,2 Nalda Romero,1 Elena Sepulveda,2 Jorge Chavez3 & Carmen Saenz2
1 Depto. Ciencia de los Alimentos y Tecnologı́a Quı́mica, Facultad de Ciencias Quı́micas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 133,
Santiago, Chile
2 Depto. Agroindustria y Enologı́a, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 1004, Santiago, Chile
3 Depto. Tecnologı́a Farmacéutica. Facultad de Ciencias Quı́micas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 133, Santiago, Chile
(Received 9 January 2010; Accepted in revised form 18 March 2010)
Summary Pomegranate (Punica granatum) bioactive compounds (polyphenols and anthocyanins) of juice (PJ) and
ethanolic extracts (PE) were encapsulated with maltodextrin (MD) or soybean protein isolates (SPI) by spray
drying using a 22 statistical factorial design for each systems studied (PJ–MD, PJ–SPI, PE–MD and PE–SPI)
considering the proportion of coating material and the inlet temperature as independent variables. The
stability of the bioactive compounds microcapsules powders obtained under optimal conditions for each
system was studied at 60 C in oven for 56 days. The polyphenols encapsulating efficiency was significantly
better in SPI matrix whereas for anthocyanins was in MD matrix. By the other hand, during the storage, the
MD microcapsules provided a significant greater protective effect on the polyphenols and anthocyanins than
SPI, as was shown by the lower degradation rate constants. When the microcapsules were added to yogurt
the stability of the bioactive compounds followed a similar behaviour to those without encapsulation, except
for PE–MD.
Keywords Anthocyanin, antioxidant activity, microcapsules, phenolic compounds, pomegranate.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02270.x
2010 Institute of Food Science and Technology
Encapsulation of polyphenols and anthocyanins P. Robert et al. 1387
2010 Institute of Food Science and Technology International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2010, 45, 1386–1394
1388 Encapsulation of polyphenols and anthocyanins P. Robert et al.
were solvent A [formic acid:water (10:90 v ⁄ v)] and using EDS 7424 software (Oxford Instruments, Oxford,
solvent B (methanol) according to a program described UK).
by Prieto et al. (2005).
The antioxidant activity was evaluated in accordance
Accelerated storage stability test
with the radical scavenging DPPH method (Gil et al.,
2000). All the analyses were carried out in duplicate and Microcapsules of pomegranate (juice or ethanol extract)
averaged. obtained under optimal conditions for each studied
system (PJ–MD, PJ–SPI, PE–MD and PE–SPI) were
stored at 60 C in a forced-air oven (Memmert model
Microcapsule powder analysis
BE 500, Schwabach, Germany) with controlled temper-
Total bioactive compounds ature and in absence of light for 56 days. Samples of
The coating material structure of the microcapsule was 0.2 g of each powder were transferred to 100 · 150 mm
completely destructed by the following procedure: for clear glass vials. For determination of bioactive com-
MD, 200 mg of the microcapsules were accurately pounds (polyphenols and anthocyanins), duplicate vials
weighed and 2 mL of methanol:acetic acid:water were removed every 7 days. Pomegranate juice without
(50:8:42 v ⁄ v ⁄ v) was added. This dispersion was agitated encapsulation was used as a control.
using a Vortex (1 min) and then an ultrasonicator twice
for 20 min. The supernatant was centrifuged at
Addition of microcapsules to a yogurt
112 000 g for 5 min and then filtered. For SPI, 200 mg
of the microcapsules were accurately weighed, and 1 mL Glass jars containing 50 g of natural yogurt Next were
of acetonitrile and 1 mL of methanol:acetic acid:water added with 0.5 g of pomegranate encapsulated powders
(50:8:42 v ⁄ v ⁄ v) were added, and then the same proce- (obtained under optimal conditions) and storage at
dure described for MD was carried out. The amounts of 5 ± 1 C during 30 days in the absence of light. A
phenolic and anthocyanin compounds were quantified control was prepared with concentrated PJ (60 Brix).
as described above. Samples were removed once a week for the determina-
tion of bioactive compounds according to Coisson et al.
Surface bioactive compounds (2005). The yogurt assay was performed by triplicate.
For the determination of surface anthocyanin and
phenolic compounds, 200 mg of microcapsules were
Statistical design
treated with 2 mL of a mixture of ethanol and methanol
(1:1). These dispersions were agitated in a Vortex at The experiments were performed with a 22 central
room temperature for 1 min and then filtered (0.45 lm composed experimental design constituted by ten exper-
Millipore filter). The amounts of phenolic and anthocy- iments for each encapsulating agent. The independent
anin compounds were quantified as described above. The variables considered were the temperature of drying
surface bioactive compound percentage (polyphenols or (140–160 and 100–140 C for MD and SPI, respectively)
anthocyanins) and the microencapsulation efficiency and the coating material (10–40% and 3–12% for MD
(ME) of microencapsulated bioactive compounds were and SPI, respectively). The dependent variables were
calculated according to eqns 1 and 2, respectively. ME of microencapsulated anthocyanins and polyphe-
nols. Response surface methodology was applied to
surface bioactive compounds optimise the ME of the bioactive compounds using
SBð%Þ ¼ 100 Statgraphics software version 7.0 (Manugistics Inc.,
theoretical total bioactive compounds
Statistical Graphics Corporation, Rockville, MA,
ð1Þ USA).
International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2010, 45, 1386–1394 2010 Institute of Food Science and Technology
Encapsulation of polyphenols and anthocyanins P. Robert et al. 1389
Table 1 Physical and chemical characteristics of PJ and PE from 2003) and lower than in a sweet juice from Spanish
pomegranate pomegranate cv. Mollar (2750 mg GAE L)1) (Pérez-
Vicente et al., 2004). Using other phenolic standard, Gil
PJ PE
et al. (2000) reported a phenolic content of 2117
Total soluble solids (Brix) 15.97 ± 0.06 13.80 ± 0.00 (mg L)1 p-cumaric acid) from a fresh the juice from
Total sugars (%) 17.72 ± 0.22 10.52 ± 0.31 arils cv. Wonderful of California and Yunfeng et al.
pH 3.15 ± 0.07 3.03 ± 0.01 (2006) reported a value of 24.4 mg tannic acid g)1 for
Acidity (% citric acid) 2.79 ± 0.13 1.02 ± 0.07 the phenolic content of pomegranate pulp.
Total phenolics compounds 2128.6 ± 0.01 1717.9 ± 5.05 The PJ total anthocyanin content (882.3 mg malvidin-
(mg GAE L)1)
3-glucoside L)1) was higher than that reported by
Total anthocyanins (mg malvidin 882.3 ± 0.01 552.1 ± 6.12
Tzulker et al. (2007), which was between 100 and
3-glucoside L)1)
Antioxidant activity 2.12 1.73
300 mg of malvidin-3-glucoside L)1 for juices prepared
DPPH (IC50 mg)1 mL)1) from the arils of twenty-nine Israeli pomegranate
accessions. Other authors have reported that the antho-
PJ, pomegranate juice; PE, pomegranate ethanolic extract; GAE, gallic cyanin content of pomegranates juices expressed as the
acid equivalent. sum of the individual anthocyanin contents, reached
values of 6–120 mg cyanidin-3-glucoside L)1 in juices
from Tunisian pomegranates (Gil et al., 1995b) and of
(2007) (11 Brix) and lower than Gil et al. (1995a) 162–387 mg cyanidin-3-glucoside L)1 in juices from
(18.25 Brix). The PE-soluble solids and total sugars fresh and frozen arils, and commercial juices from
contents were lower than those found for PJ due to a Californian pomegranates (Gil et al., 2000).
smaller extraction of those components during the The PE showed a lower total phenolic content
extract preparation. (1717.9 mg of EAG g)1) and total anthocyanins
Several organic acids such as citric, malic, oxalic, (552.1 mg of malvidin-3-glucoside L)1) compared with
acetic, fumaric, lactic and tartaric acids have been found the PJ, suggesting an incomplete extraction due to tissue
in pomegranate fruit, being citric acid the main. The PJ complexity and the different polarity and ⁄ or solubility
acidity was higher than to those informed by other of the polyphenols in ethanol.
authors, who reported to be 0.045–0.414% (Alighourchi The anthocyanins identified in JP and PE were
et al., 2008) and 0.46–1.73% (Poyrazoglu et al., 2002) delphinidin-3,5-diglucoside, cyanidin-3,5-diglucoside,
expressed as citric acid. The pH was reported to be 3.04– delphinidin-3-glucoside, pelargonidin-3,5-glucoside and
4.07 (Alighourchi et al., 2008) and 3.29–3.93 (Poyrazo- cyanidin-3-glucoside as can be seen in Fig. 1A,B. These
glu et al., 2002), similar to the value found in this study results showed the same anthocyanin profile as those
for PJ. reported by Miguel et al. (2004) for ‘Assaria’ pome-
The PJ total phenolic content reached values of 2128.6 granate, by Gil et al. (2000) for ‘Wonderful’ pomegran-
(mg GAE L)1), higher than the value reported in PJ cv. ate, and by Noda et al. (2002) who reported that
Suruc of Turkey (1564 mg L)1) (Vardin & Fenercioglu, delphinidin-3,5-diglucoside was a major anthocyanin
(A) (B)
ab a
b
Figure 1 Chromatograms of pomegranate ju-
ice (A) and ethanolic extract (B), determined cd c d
by HPLC. (a) Delphinidin-3,5-diglucoside; (b)
cyanidin-3,5-diglucoside+delphinidin-3-glu-
coside; (c) pelargonidin-3,5-glucoside and (d)
cyanidin-3-glucoside.
2010 Institute of Food Science and Technology International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2010, 45, 1386–1394
1390 Encapsulation of polyphenols and anthocyanins P. Robert et al.
in juices from Californian pomegranates. In a recent 96.7–100%, respectively. In general, the encapsulation
paper, Alighourchi et al. (2008) in fifteen Iranian efficiency reached higher values for anthocyanin than
pomegranate varieties reported the presence of pelarg- polyphenol, showing the ability of MD and SPI to bind
onidin-3-glucoside too. A reduction in the cyanidin-3,5- anthocyanins. Thus, the flavylium cation could be
diglucoside+delphinidin-3-glucoside peak was observed related with the better polymer–anthocyanin interac-
in PE according with the lower anthocyanins content tion. By the other hand, Ersus & Yurdagel (2007)
observed in PE than PJ. studied the microencapsulation of anthocyanins pig-
The antioxidant activity (diphenylpicryl-hydrazyl ments of black carrot by spray drying using MD with
(DPPH)) of PJ and PE expressed as IC50 values were different DE and found that the greatest pigment
2.12 and 1.73 mg mL)1, respectively. Ricci et al. (2006) retention was when used 20–23 DE.
reported IC50 values for PJ (1.777 mg mL)1) and The response surface methodology was applied to
aqueous extract (2.511 mg mL)1, expressed as dry optimise the encapsulation efficiency of polyphenols and
weight). The greater PE antioxidant activity could be anthocyanins considering the linear, quadratic and
attributed to other compounds extracted simultaneously cross-product forms for the independent variables stud-
(i.e. tocopherols) with ethanol and that would be ied (encapsulating agent and temperature) at P £ 0.05
playing an antioxidant function too. levels, for each system. In the case of polyphenols
encapsulation, the encapsulating agent (A) linear form
was significant in all the systems studied and their
Pomegranate bioactive compounds microencapsulation
quadratic form (A2) had significant effect for PJ–SPI
The ME of polyphenols in PJ–SPI, PJ–MD, PE–SPI and PJ–MD. The temperature (B) linear form had a
and PE–MD microcapsules were in the range of 36.6– significant effect for PJ–MD and PE–SPI and their
62.8%, 51.4–82.8%, 52–81.5% and 52.9–82.8%, respec- quadratic form (B2) for PJ–MD. The cross-product
tively. Similar polyphenols encapsulation efficiency has form (AB) was only significant for PJ–SPI.
been reported by our group in previous studies about For anthocyanins encapsulation, the linear form (A)
microencapsulated cactus pear juice with MD (10 DE) was significant for PJ–SPI and the quadratic form (A2)
(39.41–74.78%) (Sáenz et al., 2009). Wu et al. (2008) for PJ–SPI, PE–SPI and PE–MD. The temperature
using other encapsulation method (nano-precipitation linear form (B) was only significant for PJ–SPI and their
technique), reported an efficiency over 94% in micro- quadratic form (B2) did not have effect as well as the
encapsulated quercetin using Eudragit and polyvinyl crossproduct form (AB). Therefore, the encapsulating
alcohol as carriers. Other researchers reported for load agent was the most important variable for the polyphe-
ME values of 48.5–87.1% in microencapsulated po- nols encapsulation whereas for the anthocyanin encap-
lyphenols from Illex paraguariensis, with calcium algi- sulation a smaller effect was observed according to its
nate and calcium alginate–chitosan (Deladino et al., high ME.
2008). Figure 2a–d shows the graphs obtained with the
The encapsulation efficiency of anthocyanins in PJ– response surface methodology for the PJ–SPI, PJ–MD,
SPI, PJ–MD, PE–SPI and PE–MD microcapsules were PE–SPI and PE–MD designs, respectively. The effect of
in the range of 35.8–100%, 89.4–100%, 73–98.9% and the temperature and the encapsulating agent on the
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2010, 45, 1386–1394 2010 Institute of Food Science and Technology
Encapsulation of polyphenols and anthocyanins P. Robert et al. 1391
encapsulation efficiency (expressed as desirability) is allowing a greater bioactive compounds trapping than
shown. in PJ–SPI system. A higher core material to coating
material ratio (3:1) for encapsulated cactus pear juice and
ethanolic extract using MD (12–20 DE) was reported
Microcapsule powder obtained under optimal conditions
previously (Saénz et al., 2009). In that research, the
Table 2 contains the concentration values of polyphe- core ⁄ coating ⁄ water ratio and interaction between bioac-
nols and anthocyanins in the formulation and in the tive compounds and the coating material were discussed
spray-dried powder obtained under optimal conditions as parameters affecting encapsulation efficiency.
from the encapsulated juice and ethanolic extract. The The polyphenols encapsulating efficiency was signifi-
recovery percentages of bioactive compounds (polyphe- cantly better in SPI matrix whereas for anthocyanins
nols and anthocyanins) in all systems studied (PJ–SPI, was in MD matrix. This behaviour could be related with
PE–SPI, PJ–MD and PE–MD) were above 90%, the bioactive compounds nature (i.e. charge: negative
showing that the drying temperature did not affect the for polyphenols and positive for anthocyanins) and with
recovery of the bioactive compound. The recovery of polyelectrolyte structure (type and density charge),
polyphenols over 100% could be a consequence of the being SPI a poli(aminoacid) and MD a poli(glucosac-
hydrolysis of pomegranate polyphenols conjugated charide)), conditioning the bioactive–polymer interac-
during the preparation of the samples or during the tion. Kim & Morr (1996) determined that SPI shows the
drying process (Turkmen et al., 2005). In the b-carotene better encapsulating efficiency of orange oil, respect to
encapsulation with 25 DE MD, losses of 11% were whey protein isolate, arabic gum and sodium caseinate
obtained (Desobry et al., 1997). as encapsulating agents.
Table 3 shows the optimal conditions (percentage of Figure 3a–d presents SEM photographs of micro-
encapsulating agent and inlet temperature) and the ME capsules for the PJ–SPI, PJ–MD, PE–SPI and PE–MD
of the pomegranate bioactive compound microcapsules systems, respectively. The morphology of microcapsules
for PJ–SPI, PE–SPI, PJ–MD and PE–MD systems. The with both encapsulating agents was irregularly spherical
core material to coating material ratio was 1:1 for PJ– in shape with an extensively dented surface, attributed
SPI, PJ–MD and PE–MD systems and 2:1 for PE–SPI to the shrinkage of the particles during the drying
system. These results suggests that the interaction process. Similar morphology was observed in micro-
between the bioactive compounds and the coating capsules with different DE MDs (Dı́az et al., 2006;
material could be more important in the PE–SPI system Cai & Corke, 2000).
Table 2 Bioactive compounds before and after the encapsulation of the juice and ethanolic extract of pomegranate in SPI or MD
Polyphenols Anthocyanins
PJ, pomegranate juice; PE, pomegranate ethanolic extract; SPI, soybean protein isolates; MD, maltodextrin; GAE, gallic acid equivalent.
Table 3 Optimal conditions and ME of the pomegranate bioactive compounds microcapsules using SPI or MD
Polyphenols Antocyanins
Core ⁄ coating encapsulated encapsulated
System Temperature (°C) EA (%) material (% ME) (% ME)
PJ, pomegranate juice; PE, pomegranate ethanolic extract; SPI, soybean protein isolates; MD, maltodextrin; EA, encapsulating agent; ME,
microencapsulation efficiency.
Different letters show significant differences between systems (by column) (P < 0.05).
2010 Institute of Food Science and Technology International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2010, 45, 1386–1394
1392 Encapsulation of polyphenols and anthocyanins P. Robert et al.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2010, 45, 1386–1394 2010 Institute of Food Science and Technology
Encapsulation of polyphenols and anthocyanins P. Robert et al. 1393
80
80
40 40
0 0
0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60
Time (days) Time (days)
(c) (d)
80 80
Figure 4 Evolution of the polyphenol and
anthocyanins retention of microcapsules 40 40
obtained under optimal conditions during
storage at 60 C. (a, c) Juice systems and (b, 0 0
0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60
d) extract systems. PJ–MD (d), PJ–SPI ( ),
control ()), PE–MD (s) and PE–SPI (4). Time (days) Time (days)
Table 4 First-order degradation rate constant (k) of polyphenols and anthocyanins from pomegranate microcapsules obtained under optimal
conditions stored at 60 C and added to yogurt
PJ, pomegranate juice; PE, pomegranate ethanolic extract; SPI, soybean protein isolates; MD, maltodextrin GAE, gallic acid equivalent,
SD, standard deviation. Different letters show significant differences (P < 0.05).
2010 Institute of Food Science and Technology International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2010, 45, 1386–1394
1394 Encapsulation of polyphenols and anthocyanins P. Robert et al.
Coisson, J., Travaglia, F., Piana, G., Capasso, M. & Arlorio, M. Nawwar, M.A.M., Hussein, S.A.H. & Merfort, I. (1994). NMR
(2005). Euterpe oleracea juice as a functional pigment for yogurt. spectral analysis of polyphenols from Punica granatum. Phytochem-
Food Research International, 38, 893–897. istry, 36, 793–798.
Deladino, L., Anbinder, P.S., Navarro, A.S. & Martino, M.N. (2008). Noda, Y., Kanyuka, T., Mori, A. & Packer, L. (2002). Antioxidant
Encapsulation of natural antioxidants extracted from Ilex paragu- activity of pomegranate fruit extract and its anthocyanidins:
ariensis. Carbohydrate Polymer, 71, 126–134. delphinidin, cyanidin, and pelargonidin. Journal of Agricultural
Desai, K.G.H. & Park, H. J. (2005). Recent development in microen- and Food Chemistry, 50, 166–171.
capsulation of foods ingredients. Drying Technology, 23, 1361–1394. Opara, L.U., Al-Ani, M.R. & Al-Shuaibi, Y.S. (2009). Physico-
Desobry, S., Netto, F. & Labuza, T. (1997). Comparison of chemical properties, vitamin C content and antimicrobial properties
spray-drying, drum-drying and freeze-drying for b-carotene encap- of pomegranate fruit (Punica granatum L.). Food Bioprocess
sulation and preservation. Journal of Food Science, 62, 1158–1162. Technology, 2, 315–321.
Dı́az, F., Santos, E., Kerstupp, S.F., Villagómez, R. & Scheinvar, L. Osborne, D.R. & Voogt, P. (1986) Análisis de los nutrientes de los
(2006). Colorant extract from red prickly pear (Opuntia lasiacantha) alimentos. Pp. 136–137. Zaragoza: Ed. Acribia.
for food application. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricul- Pérez-Vicente, A., Serrano, P., Abellan, P. & Garcı́a-Viguera, C.
tural and Food Chemistry, 5, 1330–1337. (2004). Influence of packaging material on pomegranate juice colour
Ersus, S. & Yurdagel, U. (2007). Microencapsulation of anthocyanin and bioactive compounds, during storage. Journal of Agricultural
pigments of black carrot (Daucus carota L.) by spray drier. Journal and Food Chemistry, 84, 639–644.
of Food Engineering, 80, 805–812. Poyrazoglu, E., Gökmen, V. & Artik, N. (2002). Organic acids and
Gharsallaoui, A., Roudaut, G., Chambin, O., Voilley, A. & Saurel, R. phenolic compounds in pomegranates (Punica granatum L.)
(2007). Applications of spray-drying in microencapsulation of foods grown in turkey. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 15,
ingredients: an overview. Food Research International, 40, 1107– 567–575.
1121. Pretuccelli, S. & Añón, M.C. (1996). pH-induced modifications in the
Gil, M., Garcı́a-Viguera, C., Artés, F. & Tomás-Barberán, F. (1995a). thermal stability of soybean protein isolates. Journal of Agricultural
Changes in pomegranate juice pigmentation during ripening. Jour- and Food Chemistry, 44, 3005–3009.
nal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 68, 77–81. Prieto, M., Bartolomé, B. & Gómez-Cordovés, C. (2005). Anthocyanin
Gil, M.I., Cherif, J., Ayed, N., Artés, F. & Tomás-Barberán, F. composition, colour, and antioxidant capacity of a red wine aged in
(1995b). Influence of cultivar, maturity stage and geographical barrels or macerated with oak chips. In: Advances in Enological
location on the juice pigmentation of Tunisian pomegranates. Sciences and Technologies-1. Pp. 249–250. Palencia: University of
Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung A, 201, Valladolid.
361–364. Ricci, L., Giamperi, A., Bucchini, D. & Fraternale, D. (2006).
Gil, M. I., Tomás-Barberán, F.A., Hess-Pierce, B., Holcroft, D.M. & Antioxidant activity of Punica granatum fruits. Fitoterapia, 77,
Kader, A. (2000). Antioxidant activity of pomegranate juice and its 310–312.
relationship with phenolic composition and processing. Journal of Sáenz, C., Tapia, S., Chávez, J. & Robert, P. (2009). Microencapsu-
Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48, 4581–4589. lation by spray drying of bioactive compounds from cactus pear
Giusti, M.M. & Wrolstad, R.E. (2001). Anthocyanins. Characteriza- (Opuntia ficus-indica). Food Chemistry, 114, 616–622.
tion and measurement with UV–visible spectroscopy. In: Current Seeram, N.P., Schulman, R.N. & Herber, D. (2006). Pomegranate:
Protocols in Food Analytic Chemistry (edited by R.E. Wrolstad). Pp. Ancient Roots to Modern Medicine. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and
137–139. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Francis ⁄ CRC Press.
Huang, T.H.S., Peng, G., Kota, B.P. et al. (2005). Pomegranate flower Singleton, V.L. & Rossi, J.A. (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics
improves cardiac lipid metabolism in a diabetic rat model: role of with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American
lowering circulating lipids. British Journal of Pharmacology, 145, Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16, 144–158.
767–774. Stewart, A., Bozonnet, S., Mullen, W., Jenkins, G., Michael, E. &
Kim, Y.D. & Morr, C.V. (1996). Microencapsulation properties of Crozier, A. (2000). Occurrence of flavonoids in tomatoes and
gum Arabic and several food proteins: spray-dried orange oil tomato-based products. Journal Agricultural and Food Chemistry,
emulsion particles. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 44, 48, 2663–2669.
1314–1320. Turkmen, N., Sari, F. & Velioglu, Y. (2005). The effect of cooking
Lansky, E.P. & Newman, R.A. (2007). Punica granatum (pomegran- methods on total phenolics and antioxidant activity of selected green
ate) and its potential for prevention and treatment of inflammation vegetables. Food Chemistry, 93, 713–718.
and cancer. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 109, 177–206. Tzulker, R., Glazer, I., Bar-Ilan, I., Holland, D., Aviram, M. & Amir,
Magerranov, M.A., Abdulagatov, A.I., Azizov, N.D. & Abdulagatov, R. (2007). Antioxidant activity, polyphenols content, and related
I.M. (2007). Effect of temperature, concentration, and pressure on compounds in different fruit juices and homogenates prepared from
the viscosity of pomegranate and pear juice concentrate. Journal of 29 different pomegranate accessions. Journal of Agricultural and
Food Engineering, 80, 476–489. Food Chemistry, 55, 9559–9570.
Mars, M., Melgarejo, P., Amorós, A. & Martı́nez, R. (1997). Vardin, H. & Fenercioglu, H. (2003). Study on the development of
Pomegranate descriptors. CIHEAM. Collaborative Working Group pomegranate juice processing technology: clarification of pome-
on Underutilized Fruits Crops in the Mediterranean Region, April, granate juice. Nahrung ⁄ Food, 47, 300–303.
20 pp. CIHEAM.IAMZ, Spain. Wagner, L. & Warthesen, J. (1995). Stability of spray-dried encapsu-
Mertens-Talcott, S.U., Jilma-Stohlawetz, P., Rı́os, J., Hingorani, L. & lated carrot carotenes. Journal of Food Science, 60, 1048–1053.
Derendorf, H. (2006). Absorption, metabolism, and antioxidant Wu, T.-H., Yen, F.-L., Lin, L.-T., Tsai, T.-R., Lin, C.-C. & Cham, T.-
effects on pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) polyphenols after M. (2008). Preparation, physicochemical characterization, and
ingestion of a standardized extract in healthy human volunteers. antioxidant effects of quercetin nanoparticles. International Journal
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54, 8956–8961. of Pharmaceutics, 346, 160–168.
Miguel, G., Fontes, C., Antunes, D., Neves, A. & Martins, D. (2004). Yunfeng, L., Changjiang, G., Yang, J. Wei, J. Xu, J. & Cheng, S.
Anthocyanin concentration of ‘Assaria’ pomegranate fruits during (2006). Evaluation of antioxidant properties of pomegranate peel
different cold storage conditions. Journal of Biomedicine & Biotech- extract in comparison with pomegranate pulp extract. Food Chem-
nology, 5, 338–342. istry, 96, 254–260.
International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2010, 45, 1386–1394 2010 Institute of Food Science and Technology