Module 4 Exercise 1.3
Module 4 Exercise 1.3
GED102-B11
State A B C D E Total
Population 23,403 33,870 28,677 12,900 42, 909 118, 356
Solution:
118 , 356
SD=
32
SD=3,698.625
States A B C D E Total
Population 23,403 33,870 28,677 12,900 42,909 118, 356
SQ=G/SD 6.33 9.16 7.75 3.49 11.60
Lower Quota 6 9 7 3 11 36
Final 5 8 7 2 10 32
Apportionment
A 32
SD 3,698.625
Solution:
States A B C D E Total
Population 23,403 33,870 28,677 12,900 42,909 118, 356
SQ=G/SD 6.33 9.16 7.76 3.60 12
Lower Quota 6 9 7 3 12
Final 6 9 7 3 12 37
Apportionment
A 32
SD 3,697
*Violates the quota rule
3. Use the Webster method for apportionment to answer Problem 1.
States A B C D E Total
Population 23,403 33,870 28,677 12,900 42,909 118, 356
SQ=G/SD 6.5 9.41 7.97 3.58 11.92
Lower Quota 7 9 8 4 12
Final 7 9 8 4 12 40
Apportionment
A 32
SD 3,600
LAMBOJO, ANDREA RHEI M.
GED102-B11
4. If one seat will be added, which state should receive the additional seat based on
the Huntington-Hill number?
Solution:
2
G
The formula: H=
A( A +1)
2 2
23,403 33,870
H A= =518,655.69 HB= =1,086,341.76
32( 32+ 1) 32(32+1)
2 2
2 8,677 12,900
H C= =778,759.78 H D= =157,585.23
32(32+1) 32(32+1)
2
42,909
H E= =1,743,543.83
32(32+1)
∴The State E has the greatest Huntington-Hill number. Thus, the additional seat should be
given to State E.
5. What causes an apportion paradox? How can a paradox be avoided?
Apportion paradox happens when there is a change in the size of the group, the
required number of the allocation, and number of groups. By using other apportionment
methods such as Jefferson, Webster, and Huntington-Hill methods, this can be avoided.
Solution:
9. If one board of director is added, which building will be entitled for the additional
director using the Huntington-Hill number in Problem 6?
Solution:
2
G
H=
A( A +1)
2 2
345 2 48
H EB= =112.71 H NB= =5 8.24
32(32+1) 32(32+1)
LAMBOJO, ANDREA RHEI M.
GED102-B11