Incorporating Finite Element Analysis Based Projects in Teaching Machine Component Design
Incorporating Finite Element Analysis Based Projects in Teaching Machine Component Design
Abstract
Finite element analysis (FEA) has wide applications in industries as a powerful tool for
engineering modelling and simulation during the product development process. FEA has also
been adopted in the teaching of various mechanical engineering courses. Integrating FEA into
the machine design course provides students with a visual insight into the concepts covered in
class discussions, and an opportunity to learn the capabilities and limitations of FEA.
This paper documents an effort to integrate FEA into the machine design course at the
Purdue University Northwest. Students learn to build various FE models in the assigned class
projects. The FEA visual features enable students to visualize the resulting stress and strain
distributions, enhancing their comprehension and retention of lecture materials. These FEA-
based projects also help students understand the capabilities of FEA and how beneficial FEA can
be in the machine design and optimization process.
1 Introduction
Hand-on testing is recognized as an irreplaceable learning experience in the engineering
education, but it is often subject to limited availability because of scarce funding for purchasing,
maintaining and updating instruments and software. Increasing enrollment of students makes it
more difficult to run these tests efficiently. Computer simulation has a variety of benefits when
being applied in engineering education [Clark and DiBiasio, 2007]. With increasing
sophistication and visual enhancements, computer simulation provides an alternative to some lab
experiments which are traditionally performed by hand-on testing. One of the most attractive
characteristics in using computer simulations is that students can vary design variables and
observe corresponding effects on the results.
FEA theories rely upon rigorous mathematics and FEA courses are usually offered as upper-
level elective courses in the mechanical engineering curriculum [Chapra, 2014]. To be
competitive in the professional field, however, mechanical engineering students should learn the
FEA fundamental aspects and be cognizant of the capabilities of FEA. There are a number of
commercial FEA software packages (ANSYS, for example) which make the learning process
relatively easy.
There have been many publications on the integration of FEA into the machine design course
[Richard, 2015]. Moazed etc. [2010] introduces the concepts of FEA to students in the strength
of material course during the sophomore year and again in the machine design course during the
junior year, addressing the issues relevant to the practice and use of FEA. Six universities
collaborated and developed finite element learning models for different undergraduate
engineering courses using commercial software [Brown, etc, 2008]. These learning modules
provide undergraduate engineering students with new visually oriented insight into the
theoretical concepts, basic knowledge in finite element theory, and the ability to apply
commercial finite element software to typical engineering problems. Wendy [2018] develops
five FEA modules in the teaching of machine design course to expose students to interpretation
of FEA results. It is concluded that the FEA activities helped students understand the machine
design content much better than just performing book problems.
This paper documents an effort to integrate a series of FEA learning modules in the machine
design course. A loaded 2D truss has been simulated for learning the FEA fundamentals. The
FE model of a cantilever help students investigate the effects of changes in the cross-sectional
dimensions on the maximum stress and deflection of the cantilever. FE simulation of a plate
with a central hole allows students to visualize the stress concentration due to changes in
geometry. FE modelling of an automobile frame exposes students to real world engineering
problems. Students learn how to improve frame architecture for stress and deflection reduction.
These FEA-based projects are expected to prepare students better for professional engineering
careers.
2 FEA-Based Projects
2.1 Rod Finite Element Model of a 2D Truss
A truss is a structure composed of slender members joined together at their end points. There
are two assumptions adopted in the design and analysis of trusses. One assumption is that all
loadings are applied at the joints and the other one is that all members are joined together by
smooth pins. Because of these two assumptions, each truss member will act as a two-force
member, and therefore the force acting at each end of a member will be directed along the
longitudinal direction of the member. The force in a member is defined to be tensile force if it
tends to elongate the member. Otherwise, it is a compressive force. Figure 1 shows the
configurations of the truss assigned in this project.
Figure 1. Configurations of a simply supported plane truss. A force of 1000 lb is applied at node
G. Material properties and cross-sectional dimensions are defined by students.
Students conduct hand calculations first for the reactions at each support and the internal
force in each member. This analytical analysis is based on the joint method and the analysis
procedure is as follows:
Drawing the free-body diagram of the entire truss, building equilibrium equations and
solving these equations for the external reactions at all supports.
Drawing the free-body diagram of a joint having at least one known force and at most
two unknown forces, resolving each force acting on the joint into x and y components,
building the two force equilibrium equations ΣFx=0 and ΣFy=0, and solving equations
for the unknown member forces.
Continuing to analyze each of the remaining joints for other unknown member forces.
Students then build FE model of this truss by using rod elements (link180 in ANSYS).
Students are expected to learn the following fundamental aspects of FEA through this project:
Using consistent units.
Building geometric models.
Selecting proper element types.
Defining material properties, real constants and cross section properties.
Meshing the geometric model.
Applying constraints and loads.
Solving the FE model.
Post-processing the FE results.
Students compare their FE results to those derived from hand calculations, as shown in Table
1. The FE and analytical values agree well. This project helps students realize that FEA is an
efficient analysis method and has been a powerful tool in machine design.
FEA (lb) 707 500 500 500 707 1000 500 1000 707 1500 1000
Analytical (lb) 707 500 500 500 707 1000 500 1000 707 1500 1000
In this project students simulate cantilever beams and automobile frame structures by using
beam element-based FE models. The former has analytical solutions and students can compare
their FE results with corresponding analytical ones. The later exposes students to a real-world
engineering design problem which helps students learn how to identify critical locations on the
auto frames for architecture optimization based on resulting Von Mises stress distributions.
In this project students measure the dimensions of a real light-duty truck frame and built
corresponding FE model using finite beam elements, as shown in Figure 2(a). The FE model is
composed of two curved beams with C-shaped cross section along the longitudinal direction and
three cross members along the transverse direction. Cross members help enhance structural
stiffness to avoid excessive deformation under external loads. Students constrain the frame at
the four suspension/frame mount locations. Parallel uniformly distributed loads are applied
vertically on both sides. Based on the resulting Von Mises stress distributions of the frame under
the applied constraints and loadings, students continue to modify the frame architecture by
introducing another cross member at appropriate locations for strength and stiffness
reinforcement, see Figure 2(b).
(a) (b)
Figure 2 (a) FE model of the original light-duty truck frame; (b) FE model of the reinforced truck
frame by introducing more cross members at appropriate locations.
This project challenges students to adopt advanced ANSYS functions in their FE models.
For instance, students have learned to define the orientations of beam elements in the auto frame
models. Beam elements are used to create a mathematical one-dimensional idealization of a 3-D
structure. A beam element is represented as a line in FE models, without inherent orientation of
its cross-sections. Students should specify corresponding orientation for each beam element in
their FE models. Through this project, students understand the capabilities of FEA and how
beneficial FEA can be in the product design and optimization.
Both analytical analysis and FEA analysis are conducted in this project. First, each team
works on the constrained and loaded plate for analytical solutions. Students conduct hand
calculations to determine the stress concentration factor based on predefined dimensions and
calculate corresponding maximum stress at critical locations. Secondly, students build FE model
by using finite plate elements. Figure 3(a) show the plate FE model with the left side constrained
and the right side uniformly loaded. Stress concentration is obvious in the resulting Von Mises
stress distribution as shown in Figure 3(b).
(a) (b)
Figure 3 (a) FE model of a rectangular plate with a central hole; (b) maximum Von Mises
stress in the vicinity of the hole.
3. Student Assessments
Follow-up survey was conducted for assessing the efforts of integrating the FEA-based
projects in the machine design course. The four questions in the survey are as follows:
1) FEA-based projects help me understand the concepts discussed in the machine design
course.
2) FEA-based projects help me improve my critical thinking in machine design
considerations.
3) FEA-based projects help me understand the capabilities and limitations of finite element
method.
4) FEA-based projects improve my techniques and skills of FEA modelling for engineering
practice.
Responses to the first question show that students benefit from these FEA modelling projects,
which provide a new visually oriented insight into the theoretical concepts. The second question
is one of the author’s teaching goals that foster critical thinking and life-long learning to promote
continuing professional development. Responses to the third survey question indicate that there
are approximately one third of students who are not clear about the capabilities and limitations of
FEA. This is mainly because (1) students have no experience in FEA modeling before taking
this course; and (2) students are short of the theoretical background to understand the numerical
results from FEA. The author believes that an brief introduction to the FEA fundamentals and
more real life engineering projects (airplane wings, for example) will be beneficial for students
to realize that FEA is an efficient and powerful tool in machine designs. The last question
measures the contribution of this innovative teaching effort to one of the student outcomes in
ABET Criterion 3 which emphasizes on the ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern
engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.
Figure 4 Student assessments of the FEA-based projects on their learning
4. Conclusion
It is believed that FEA-based computer simulation has a variety of benefits when being
applied in engineering education and research. This paper documents an effort to integrate FEA
modeling into Machine Design course teaching. Students learned to build a series of FE models
in ANSYS and utilize these models to enhance their understandings of the strength and stiffness
analysis discussed in class. Additionally, students are exposed to real-life engineering problems
and learned how to improve structural performance based on FE results. Student feedback to this
effort is positive.
Reference
1. Clark, W. and DiBiasio, D. (2007). Computer simulation of laboratory experiments for
enhanced learning. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Honolulu, Hawaii, June 24-27.
2. Chapra, S. and Canale, R., 2014, Numerical methods for engineers, 6th edition, McGraw-Hill
Higher Education.
3. Richard G Budynas and J Keith Nisbett, 2015, Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design,
10th edition, McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
4. Moazed, A.R., Roberts, R., Le, X. and Duva A., 2010, Teaching finite element analysis in
undergraduate technology curriculum. ASEE Northeast Section Conference, Wentworth
Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, May 7-8
5. Brown, A., Rencis, J.J., Jensen, D., et al, (2008). Finite element learning modules for
undergraduate engineering topics using commercial software. ASEE Annual Conference &
Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA. June 22- 25.
6. Wendy S. Reffeor G, 2018, Using FEA as a Pedagogical Tool for Teaching Machine
Component Design. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT.,
June 24-27.
Biographical Notes
Shengyong Zhang (syzhang@pnw.edu) is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at
the Purdue University Northwest. He has teaching and research interest in the areas of computer
modeling and simulation, vibration and acoustics, system dynamics, and automobile lightweight
design.