Critical Decision Making For Providers
Critical Decision Making For Providers
Name
Institution
Course
Instructor
Date
CRITICAL DECISION MAKING FOR PROVIDERS 2
Healthcare providers have a responsibility to their patients and their employers, and in
some cases, conflicts in the two may happen, affecting a provider's decision given the impact
of the outcomes. When faced with a dilemma, healthcare providers experience significant
distress when deciding, especially when varying reasons support the two options. However,
as noted by De Kok et al. (2018), ethical behavior is critical and will always guide a
healthcare provider in making rational decisions when faced with a dilemma relating to
commitment to patients and achieving targets. In exploring the decision-making process for
providers and the factors that drive them to make such decisions and the associated
consequences, a review of Mike's case scenario defines the dilemma and decision options
Case Description
another party to the decision. In the case presented, Mike, a father, and a husband are lab
technicians who have had issues with coming late at work, which the supervisor has noted
and given a warning. Mike is committed to not repeating the mistake. Today, Mike left home
20 minutes before the usual time he leaves, but there was an accident resulting in a delay on
the way to work. However, he arrived in the building at the right time but saw a safety hazard
spill. Stopping to clean up the fall would mean that Mike would be late in clocking, violating
an agreement with the supervisor on lateness. Ignoring the spill will imply that other
Presented with the case, Mike has two major decision choices: ignore the problem or
report it. WHO (2018) described that slips and trips are the major causes of falls within
CRITICAL DECISION MAKING FOR PROVIDERS 3
healthcare settings, resulting in significant suffering and loss of human resources during
emergency cases. Understanding key risk factors for such falls is important, and healthcare
providers should work with other staff to address these issues. Mike's decision to report and
stop first to address the issue is guided by this understanding of safety hazards and the need
to prevent suffering and unnecessary resource utilization. While stopping to address the issue
might have resulted in Mie losing his job, the action and decision taken were ethical, well-
received, and appreciated by Mike's supervisor. The adverse outcomes of the spill and the
risk of losing his job were averted when Mike made a call to report the issue.
Mike might have also been compelled to ignore the issue based on the supervisor's
waring due to lateness in previous cases. Mike has a wife and child and is financially striving
to provide for his family, meaning that losing his job is not an option. O'Donovan, De Brún,
and McAuliffe (2021) noted that healthcare providers could engage in avoidance behaviors
such as silence to prevent interpersonal risks. Ignoring the issue would have enabled Mike to
clock in time but would have resulted in significant physical harm to the patient. If such an
event happens in a facility, there is a high chance that healthcare providers would prefer to
address the issue that ignores it as safety has empathized as a fundamental aspect of practice
in the facility. Environmental safety is important in protecting providers' and patients' safety
Transcultural
relationships, which are the foundation for patient-centered care. In this case, the patient
cannot speak English but has a family member to help in addressing the communication
barrier. Patient education ensures that the patient has adequate discharge information to
enhance medication management and self-care practices. While the family member helps
CRITICAL DECISION MAKING FOR PROVIDERS 4
interpretation and calm the patient down. As described by Purnell and Fenkl (2020),
language, gestures, and eye movement may enhance a positive communication outcome
when communicating with a person from a person different culture. In providing education
for the patient, the initial thing is to make the patient relax using a slow and even tone which
may help calm the patient. Maintaining calmness and slow speaking is important as the
patient is already anxious and restless due to prolonged discharge. Using translation services
of the family member would be important in meeting the patient's informational needs.
and visual material to emphasize ideas would be important for this patient.
It is important to ensure that the patient fully understands the discharge information.
However, with communication barriers, this would be challenging. For this patient, asking
questions on specific areas of the discharge information through the interpreter is essential.
As Squires (2018) recommended, observing how the patient responds to the interpreter
through body language is important. Further, an analysis of eth level of relaxation in the
The current patient's status needs a sensitive approach to enhance patient outcomes
communication, avoiding conflict, and being clear and specific to the content improves
outcomes. However, if a provider focuses on providing information without the care of the
CRITICAL DECISION MAKING FOR PROVIDERS 5
patient's feelings, there is a likelihood that the information will not be understood, leading to
issues while promoting ethical behavior in patient care. One ethical issue is that the
professional did not observe the value of accountability, which directs one to do what is right
and take responsibility for actions. Taking responsibility would involve telling the patient that
the accident was due to the provider's inaction. Maintaining truthfulness or veracity is another
value that was not evident and which should have been as it ensures that the patient
understands the problem, the cause, and how to handle the issue.
Conclusion
presented in the case of Mike, an organization's policies may inhibit a provider from doing
what is right, but it is the provider's responsibility to determine the best cause of action to
prevent adverse patient outcomes. Reporting the issue was the most ethical course of action
for Mike. Ignoring the issue led to prolonged hospitalization and suffering of a patient.
References
De Kok, B. C., Widdicombe, S., Pilnick, A., & Laurier, E. (2018). Doing patient-
dilemmas in ART adherence support. Social Science & Medicine, 205, 17-25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.030
O'Donovan, R., De Brún, A., & McAuliffe, E. (2021). Healthcare professionals experience
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626689
Purnell, L. D., & Fenkl, E. A. (Eds.). (2020). Textbook for transcultural health care: A
Nature.
10.5772/intechopen.74995