0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views2 pages

Uniform Asymptotic Stability of Linear Time-Varying Systems

This document discusses uniform asymptotic stability of linear time-varying systems. It describes how the stability properties of such systems depend not only on the evolution of eigenvalues over time, but also on the evolution of corresponding eigenvectors. It reviews some existing results on stability conditions and identifies opportunities for new contributions, such as developing less conservative stability criteria that explicitly consider eigenvector evolution.

Uploaded by

qiuqiusbx
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views2 pages

Uniform Asymptotic Stability of Linear Time-Varying Systems

This document discusses uniform asymptotic stability of linear time-varying systems. It describes how the stability properties of such systems depend not only on the evolution of eigenvalues over time, but also on the evolution of corresponding eigenvectors. It reviews some existing results on stability conditions and identifies opportunities for new contributions, such as developing less conservative stability criteria that explicitly consider eigenvector evolution.

Uploaded by

qiuqiusbx
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 2

1

Uniform asymptotic stability of linear


time-varying systems
Dirk Aeyels and Joan Peuteman
Universiteit Gent
SYSTeMS
Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 9
9052 Gent
BELGIUM
dirk.aeyels~rug.ac.be
joan.peuteman~rug.ac.be

1 Description of the problem


Let x(t) = A(t)x(t), with x: R --t Rn and A: R --t Rnxn, be a linear time-
varying system. We consider the case where the eigenvalues of the system
matrix as functions of the time t E R may have positive real parts. Con-
sider the following examples: the matrix Al(t) := diag(-l + 2cost, -1 -
2cost) and the matrix A2(t) := diag(-l + max{2cost,-2cost},-1 -
max{2cost,-2cost}). Notice that Al(t) and A2(t) have the same eigen-
values Vt E R. The system x( t) = Al (t )x(t) is uniformly asymptotically
stable and the system ±(t) = A2(t)X(t) is unstable. This illustrates that the
stability properties do not only depend on the evolution of the eigenval-
ues. The evolution of the corresponding eigenvectors will also playa crucial
role.
We are interested in formulating a sufficient condition (preferably easily
verifiable) for asymptotic stability of ±(t) = A(t)x(t). Since this problem
turns out to be non-trivial and since specific versions of this problem are
currently being examined within the framework of complexity theory [9], we
will restrict our attention to a particular class ±(t) = - f(t)m(t)mT(t)x(t)
with m : R -+ R n and f : R --t R taking both negative and positive values.
Even this problem turns out to be non-trivial.

V. Blondel et al. (eds.), Open Problems in Mathematical Systems and Control Theory
© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1999
2 Uniform asymptotic stability of linear time-varying systems

2 Available results and desired extensions


1. A fast time-varying system x(t) = A(o:t)x(t) with 0: sufficiently large
and with the additional properties that A(t) and its derivatives up to
the second order are continuous and bounded, is exponentially sta-
ble when the averaged system x(t) = Ax(t) is exponentially stable
[2, 4, 10]. When the system matrix A(t) is periodic with period T,
then A = ~ JOT A(t)dt.
When the system matrix A(t) is periodic with period T, then the
slowly time-varying system x(t) = A(~)x(t) with 0: sufficiently large
is exponentially stable when the average of the real part of the instan-
taneous eigenvalue Amax(t) is negative Le. ~ J{ Amax(t)dt < 0 [11].
Here, Amax(t) denotes the instantaneous eigenvalue of A(t) with the
largest real part.
The study of the stability of a system x(t) = A(t)x(t) with a system
matrix A(t) which is neither fast time-varying nor slowly time-varying
is an ambitious task. There are some results available in the litera-
ture [16, 6] which will be discussed. New contributions in the field are
welcome.

2. Wazewski has shown that when ¢(t, to, xo) denotes the solution of
x{t) = A(t)x(t) with initial condition Xo at to that 11¢(t, to, xo)11 ::;
Ilxoller(t,to) with r(t, to) := !J t: Amax{a)da. Here Amax(a) is the
largest eigenvalue of A(a)+AT (a). For a proof based on Liapunov the-
ory, we refer the reader to [16]. Notice that the system x = A(t)x(t)
with A(t):= diag(-1 +2cost,-I- 2cost) is exponentially stable
without satisfying the condition of WazewskL This example illus-
trates that it is a sufficient condition which is also for systems with
a symmetric system matrix, rather conservative. Therefore, it would
be useful to obtain a less conservative condition e.g. by an explicit
use of the evolution of the eigenvectors.

3. Consider a class of n-dimensional systems, each system matrix in


companion form with coefficients Pi (t) and with the additional prop-
erty that 'Vt E R : 0 ::; al ::; Pi(t) ::; bi (i = 1, ... , n). A necessary
and sufficient condition that all solutions of an arbitrary equation of
this class of systems is nonoscillatory (every nontrivial solution has
only a finite number of zeros on [to, oo[ ) and tends to zero as t ---+ 00
is that the polynomials un + alun - 1 + b2u n - 2 + a3Un-3 + ... and
un +b1u n - 1 +a2 Un - 2 +b3u n - 3 + ... have only real roots. These roots
are negative since the coefficients of the polynomials are nonnega-
tive. Levin [6] shows that this statement implies that the instanta-
neous eigenvalues of each system matrix are negative and real. The
requirement that the roots are negative is a necessary condition for
asymptotic stability of each system belonging to the class (without

You might also like