GUIDES To Grenier Model
GUIDES To Grenier Model
9 min read
Growing your company is exciting, stressful, at times tiring, but always fun!
During the growth you’ll encounter numerous crises that will jeopardise the
success. As with most of life’s business problems, there’s a framework to
explain or help map out this scenario…
The graph shows time on the X axis and size of the business on the Y axis,
with both increasing as the company goes through the different phases.
The Delegation phase of growth occurs when key staff members are given
accountability and responsibility to deliver in areas where they are better
equipped to than the manager. At this point in a company life there will be
specialist employees, focused on specific roles.
Delegating jobs to more specialist, skilled employees means you’ll get a better
result, with the added benefit that the executive team have time to focus on
the market data, their strategic decisions, and business planning.
This is now a mature stage of growth, one that focuses on the company core
competencies and all departments working in line with each other to output a
product or service. Growth comes from the whole business being greater than
the sum of its parts.
The final stage of growth is a new one introduced more recently to the curve,
and it focuses on strategic alliances. The idea being that companies may
merge, acquire, partner or work with other companies in order to grow
themselves.
This is a common issue for start-ups and young companies that find
themselves growing via creativity and innovation. Initially with a small and
informal team it’s possible for founders to manage the business in a relaxed
manner, but over time this becomes a challenge.
The crisis around the Delegation phase can be summed up with two factors:
Founders and managers can find it difficult to let go and give others full
control over certain aspects of the business.
Communication may be difficult. At this point in a company’s life there
can be problems between management or employees about what is
trying to be achieved in each job and how to get the best result.
The latter can sometimes be a reason to reinforce the behaviour of the former,
with founders citing concerns that if they do not do something it won’t be done
well. It ultimately will result in a sub-par outcome though, with founders
struggling to ‘do everything’ and teams feeling unmotivated.
Another very relatable crisis within the life of a company is that of 'Red Tape'
or bureaucracy. The addition of extra reports, processes, functions, all of
which contribute to additional work for employees and can risk the wider
culture of the business.
This can slow down decision making, resulting in a less agile company that
cannot respond to market changes while also suffering a wider loss of
efficiency/reduced margins.
Of course, this is a risk at all points in a company life, but it has more chance
of arising when coordination is required and thus processes are needed within
a company.
The final crisis is one of how to grow. In the framework we’ve moved through
each phase, so the company is now successful and mature. The question
becomes how does it continue to grow, given the success?
If you’re in Collaboration, then perhaps Alliances are your way forward. If you
are already developing partnerships then perhaps diversification is the route
to growth? There are lots of potential options here, it’s a good point to
evaluate your industry and develop a new strategy.
It’s simple and in real life the lines blur between phases
Not all companies follow the curve in a linear way
The crises may not always occur in each phase