Lecture 1
Lecture 1
LECTURE 1
1 Introduction
1.1 Ressources
Do not hesitate to email me for questions related to the course. I might take a few days
to reply if the term is getting really busy, but I normally make sure to never an email
unanswered. I will keep the example sheets from last year. I will give access on moodle to
the lecture notes of some previous incarnations of this course, by Gabriel Paternain and by
Mihalis Dafermos (typed and extended by Paul Minter). Excellent books are also listed in
the syllabus, you can find them in the library or on libgen.
1
a proof of the “remarkable” theorem of Gauss (“Theorema Egregium”) that states that the
Gaussian curvature is invariant under isometric diffeomorphism.
Chapter 3: Variation Theory.
This chapter studies extremal manifolds for the notion of length or area introduced in
the previous chapter. In dimension 1, it introduces the curves locally minimising length on
a surface, aka geodesics (e.g. straight lines in a plane, great circles on a sphere, etc). In
dimension 2 it introduces surfaces that locally minimise their area under small deformations,
aka minimal surfaces. The highlight of this chapter is a beautiful connexion between minimal
surfaces and the tools you have seen in complex variables last year.
Chapter 4: Global Riemannian Geometry of Surfaces.
The first chapter dealt with “global” qualitative properties and the second and third
chapters dealt with “local” quantitative (metric) properties. This last chapter introduces the
powerful “local-to-global principle” that sometimes allows to connect these two viewpoints.
It is introduced with the Gauss-Bonnet theorem, whose proof is the highlight of the chapter
and of the course. If K is the Gaussian curvature and χ is the Euler characteristic (number
of vertices minus number of edges plus number of faces) of the surface S, then
Z
K = 2πχ.
S
Noting that χ is a topological invariant of the surface and K is a local geometric invariant,
this tells us something very powerful: the topology of the surface S puts restrictions on the
geometry of S, and vice-versa. This formula is known as the Gauss-Bonnet formula. The
proof is based on a “triangulation”, i.e. the decomposition of the surface into many small
geodesic triangles on which one can relate of the sum of angles to the curvature.
To conclude this overview: this is a course dense with deep abstract concepts. Something
that will however help us is the overlap with IB Geometry (curves, surfaces, Gauss map,
geodesics and exponential map. . . ).
2
Now that we have the notion of smoothness on general subsets, we can define the notion
of manifold.
Remark 5. It is standard to slightly abuse notation and write ϕ−1 = (x1 , . . . , xk ), meaning
in fact that each coordinate xi is a function of v ∈ Vx . Note also that the parametrisation is
not unique. In particular, one can always translate U so that ϕ−1 (x) = 0 when convenient.
S1 ⊂ R2 defined by ψ(x) := ( 1 − x2 , x) parametrises the right half circle, etc. This allows
to cover the circle with overlapping charts, which proves the result.
• Let us prove that the sphere S2 = {(x, y, z) ∈ R3 | x2 + y 2 + z 2 = 1} is a smooth
manifold of dimension
√ 2 in R3 . The map ϕ : B(0, 1) ⊂ R2 → S2 ⊂ R3 defined by
ϕ(x, y) := (x, y, 1 − x − xy ) is a diffeomorphism (check it) which parametrises
2
√ the upper
half sphere. Similarly ϕ̃ : B(0, 1) ⊂ R2 → S2 ⊂ R3 defined by ϕ̃(x, y) := (x, y, − 1 − x2 − xy )
parametrises
√ the lower half sphere, ψ : B(0, 1) ⊂ R2 → S2 ⊂ R3 defined by ψ(x, y) :=
(x, 1 − x2 − xy , y) parametrises the eastern half sphere, etc. This allows to cover the sphere
with overlapping charts, which proves the result.
Exercise 7. Extend the previous argument to prove that Sn = {(x1 , . . . , xn+1 ) ∈ Rn+1 | x21 +
x22 + · · · + x2n+1 = 1} is a smooth manifold of dimension n in Rn+1 , for any n ∈ N∗ .