Fractional-Order and Power-Law Shelving Filters Analysis and Design Examples
Fractional-Order and Power-Law Shelving Filters Analysis and Design Examples
Fractional-Order and Power-Law Shelving Filters Analysis and Design Examples
November 2, 2021.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3122238
ABSTRACT Low-pass and high-pass non-integer order shelving filter designs, which are suitable for
acoustic applications, are presented in this work. A first design is based on a standard fractional-order bilinear
transfer function, while a second one is based on the transposition of the integer-order transfer function into
its power-law counterpart. Both transfer functions are approximated using the Oustaloup approximation
tool, while the implementation in the case of the power-law filters is performed through the employment
of the concept of driving-point impedance synthesis. An attractive benefit is the extra degree of freedom,
resulting from the variable order of both fractional-order and power-law filters, which allows improved
design flexibility compared to the case of integer-order filters. From the implementation point of view, only
one building block is required to realize both filter types, thanks to the employment of the Voltage Conveyor.
INDEX TERMS Fractional-order filters, power-law filters, shelving filters, acoustic filters, fractional-order
impedance, Oustaloup approximation, voltage conveyor.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
VOLUME 9, 2021 145977
S. Kapoulea et al.: Fractional-Order and Power-Law Shelving Filters: Analysis and Design Examples
Setting sα = ωα · cos( απ απ
Although this scheme offers electronic tunability and versatil- 2 ) + j sin( 2 ) in (1), the derived
ity, as both low-pass and high-pass filters are implementable expressions for the magnitude and phase responses are
by the same core, it suffers from the large active component
count. | HFO (ω) |
p
In the present work, two different methods are followed for = GL GH
the implementation of non-integer shelving filter functions. √ #1/2
(ωτ0 )2α + 2 G (ωτ0 )α cos απ
"
2 +G
The first one is based on the substitution of the capaci- · √ , (3)
G (ωτ0 )2α + 2 G (ωτ0 )α cos απ
tors in the conventional (i.e., integer-order) shelving filter 2 +1
structures by fractional-order ones and their approximation 6 HFO (ω)
(ωτ0 )α sin απ
" #
by suitable RC networks. The second one is related to the
−1 2
implementation of power-law shelving filters and is based on = tan √
G + (ωτ0 )α cos απ
the approximation of a transfer function formed as a ratio of 2
" √
G (ωτ0 )α sin απ
#
a power-law impedance and an integer-order impedance. The
− tan −1
√ 2
. (4)
overall power-law impedance is approximated and this is the 1 + G (ωτ0 )α cos απ 2
main difference compared to fractional-order filters, where
√
only the impedance of the corresponding fractional-order The gain at the frequency ω0 is equal to GL GH and is
capacitor is approximated. This leads to the reduction of the the (geometric) mean of the characteristic gains of the filter.
circuit complexity in terms of passive component count. The Considering (2), it is derived that the pole and zero loca-
performed comparison shows that the power-law shelving tions are adjustable through the order of the filter. This
filter function is the most advantageous solution with regards is not the √ case for integer-order filters (α = 1), where
√
to the spread of the values of passive elements, without ωP = ω0 / G, ωZ = ω0 G, and the position of the pole
losing the extra degree of freedom, which is offered by the and zero is fixed through G and ω0 . Owing to the fact that the
variable order of the filter. Another important point is that pole and zero locations determine the location of the low (ωL )
the implementation of both filters is performed using only and high (ωH ) cutoff frequencies (they are not the same in
one active element, which is the Voltage Conveyor (VCII) the case of fractional-order filters), the slope of the transition
[19]–[22]. between the two bands can be adjusted through the order of
The paper is organized as follows: the effect of the order on the filter, assuming that the shelving gain (G) and the center
the frequency characteristics of both types of filters is studied frequency (ω0 ) are predefined. The slope of the gain through
in Section II, where the findings are supported by MAT- the transition from the passband to the stopband is calculated
LAB results. The proposed fractional-order and power-law through the following expression
filters implementations are introduced in Section III, and the
verification of their behavior is performed using the TSMC 20 log(G)
slope = (dB/dec). (5)
log ωωHL
0.18 µm CMOS process technology file in Section IV.
II. NON-INTEGER SHELVING FILTERS In order to have a better sense of the effect of the pole
A. FRACTIONAL-ORDER SHELVING FILTERS and zero location on the cutoff frequencies and, consequently,
The transfer function of a fractional-order (0 < α < 1) on the slope, let us consider the case of a filter with a given
shelving filter, is given by (1) set of {ω0 , G, GL(H ) } and with pole and zero frequencies far
√ apart from each other. As a result, the low and high cutoff
p (τ0 s)α + G frequencies will be determined according to the following
HFO (s) = GL GH · √ , (1)
G (τ0 s)α + 1 expressions [11]
απ απ 1/α
where the shelving gain G is defined as G ≡ GL /GH , with
r
ωL,FO = ωP · 1 + cos 2 − cos ,
GL and GH being the asymptotic low and high frequency 2 2
gains, respectively [18]. In the case that GL > GH , the filter r απ απ 1/α
performs as low-pass filter, while for GL < GH it behaves ωH ,FO = ωZ · 1 + cos2 + cos ,
as a high-pass filter. The time constant is τ0 = 1/ω0 , and the 2 2
pole and zero frequencies are equally spaced (in logarithmic (6)
scale) around the characteristic frequency ω0 according to (2) or, using (2)
1 1
ωP = ω0 G− 2α , ωZ = ω0 G 2α . (2) 1
r απ απ 1/α
ωL,FO = ω0 G − 2α
· 1 + cos 2 − cos ,
2 2
Therefore, the characteristic frequency will be the r απ απ 1/α
(geometric) mean of the pole and zero frequencies, i.e., ω0 = ωH ,FO = ω0 G 2α
1
· 1 + cos2 + cos .
√
ωP · ωZ , and it will be referred to as center frequency 2 2
hereinafter. (7)
TABLE
1. Frequency response characteristics of fractional-order filters for
α = 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and their integer-order counterpart.
TABLE
2. Frequency response characteristics of power-law filters for
α = 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and their integer-order counterpart.
Considering the model in Fig. 7, the design equations become Bn sn + Bn−1 sn−1 + . . . + B1 s + B0
Z (s) = , (18)
R2 //rX R1 //R2 //rX An sn + An−1 sn−1 + . . . + A1 s + A0
GL = , GH = ,
R3 + rY R3 + rY with Ai and Bi (i = 0 . . . n) being positive and real coeffi-
R2 //rX cients. The required number of capacitors and resistors is
G= , equal to n and n + 4, respectively. The design equations of
1 + R1 //R2 //rX
i1 the Foster type-I network in Fig. 10 are summarized in (19)
α
hp
τ0 = R1 [R1 + (R2 //rX )]C1α , (16)
ri 1
R3 //rX R3 //rX R0 = k, Ri = , Ci = (i = 1, 2 . . . n), (19)
GL = , GH = , |pi | ri
R2 + rY (R1 //R2 ) + rY
(R1 //R2 ) + rY where ri , pi , k are the residues, poles and gain of (18) [24].
G= ,
R2 + rY
i1 B. IMPLEMENTATION OF POWER-LAW SHELVING FILTERS
α
hp
τ0 = R1 [R1 + (R2 + rY )]C1α . (17) The implementation of the power-law shelving filters will
be performed by the topologies in Figs. 11–12, where
Therefore, the parasitics affect both the shelving gain, as Zeq is considered as a driving-point impedance [25], given
well as the characteristic frequency of the filter. by (20)–(21), in the case of low-pass and high-pass
filters, respectively.
1
!α
p τ0 s + G 2a
Zeq,PL−LP (s) = R3 GL GH · 1
, (20)
G 2a τ0 s + 1
1
!α
R3 G 2a τ0 s + 1
Zeq,PL−HP (s) = √ · 1
. (21)
GL GH τ0 s + G 2a the Foster type-I network in Fig. 10, calculated using the
The approximation of the impedances in Figs. 11–12 can expressions in (19) and rounded to the standard electronic
be performed using the Oustaloup approximation [26], with component values conforming to the E96 series defined in
the resulting rational polynomial transfer function having the IEC 60063, are summarized in Table 3.
form of (18) and, consequently, being implementable by the MOS transistors provided by the TSMC 0.18 µm CMOS
RC network in Fig. 10 using the design equations of (19). process are used in the simulations of the VCII topology
The required number of capacitors is the same as in the case shown in Fig. 13 [27]. Considering that VDD = −VSS =
of fractional-order filters, but the number of resistors is now 0.9 V and IB1 = IB2 = 30 µA, the nMOS transistors’ aspect
reduced by three, becoming equal to n + 1. ratio is chosen as 13.5 µm / 0.54 µm, while for the pMOS
Considering the effect of parasitic resistances of the VCII transistors as 40 µm / 0.54 µm. The bulk terminals of the
in both types of filters in Figs. 11–12, the derived transfer pMOS transistors are connected to the source terminals of
functions are modified to (22)–(23) the relevant transistors, while the bulk terminals of the nMOS
transistors are connected to the negative DC supply voltage.
1 The parasitic resistances of Y, X, and Z terminal of VCII were
HPL−LP (s) = · HPL (s), (22)
calculated as 49.3 Ω, 16.33 M Ω and 52.76 Ω, respectively.
rY Zeq
1+ R3 · 1+ rX
It should be noted that the parasitic output resistance of the
1 X terminal has been increased thanks to the cascode stage.
HPL−HP (s) = · HPL (s), (23)
1 + RrX3 · 1 + rY
Zeq
The dimensions of the derived layout design of VCII, given
in Fig. 13, are 40.78 µm × 37.55 µm, while the total power
with HPL (s) being the transfer function in (9). consumption is equal to 380.6 µW .
According to (9) and (22)–(23), the presence of parasitics The obtained post-layout magnitude and phase responses
affects only the gain of the realized transfer function. of the fractional-order filters in the acoustic band
(20 Hz − 20 kHz) are depicted in Fig. 14 (solid lines),
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS along with the corresponding ones derived by the Oustaloup
A. FRACTIONAL-ORDER FILTERS approximation of the transfer functions, marked by dashes.
The performance of the proposed shelving filter topologies The most important characteristics of their frequency behav-
in Figs. 8–9 and 11–12 will be evaluated considering fil- ior are summarized in Table 4, where the values that cor-
ter functions with {GL , GH } equal to {10,1} (low-pass) or respond to the Oustaloup approximation are given between
{1,10} (high-pass) and center frequency f0 = 1 kHz. Assum- parentheses.
ing that R3 = 20 k, in the case of low-pass fractional-order The sensitivity of the filter, with regards to the effects of
filter functions, the values of R1 , R2 , calculated from (14) MOS transistor mismatching and process parameters varia-
or (15), are 22.1 k and 200 k, respectively, while the tions as well as of passive elements’ values variations, has
values of the pseudo-capacitance C1α for orders 0.7, 0.8, been evaluated through the utilization of the Monte-Carlo
0.9 are 31.319 nF/s0.3 , 13.061 nF/s0.2 and 5.47 nF/s0.1 . analysis tool offered by the Analog Design Environment for
Accordingly, in the case of high-pass filters, R1 = 2.21 k, N = 100 runs. The obtained statistical plots of the gain and
R2 = 20 k and the pseudo-capacitances are 31.319 nF/s0.3 , phase at the center frequency of a high-pass shelving filter
13.061 nF/s0.2 and 54.47 nF/s0.1 . Considering a 5th -order with α = 0.8 are demonstrated in Figs. 15–16, where the
Oustaloup approximation, the values of passive elements of values of the standard deviation were 0.133 dB and 0.085◦
FIGURE 13. Modified VCII topology and the corresponding layout design employed in simulations [27].
V. CONCLUSION
Two types of shelving filters, a conventional fractional-order
one and a power-law one, both derived from an integer-order
based function, were designed in this work. It was partic-
ularly shown that, for fulfilling the design specifications,
the required order of the power-law filter is smaller than that
of the corresponding fractional-order filter and this stems
from the fact that the location of the cutoff frequencies is
different for filters of the same order. Both filters are real-
ized using appropriately configured RC networks intended
to approximate the fractional-order capacitor, in the case
of fractional-order filters, and the driving-point impedance,
in the case of power-law filters. The design procedure is
straightforward and the resulting structures are constructed
FIGURE 19. Monte-Carlo analysis results of the gain at the center from just one active element. This is not the case in the topolo-
frequency f0 = 1 kHz of a high-pass power-law (α = 0.506) shelving
filter.
gies presented in [18], where OTAs have been used as active
elements and the increased circuit complexity and compli-
cated design procedure were the price paid for the offered
design flexibility and versatility. The realized filter functions
have been obtained using a 5th -order Oustaloup approxima-
tion and the provided post-layout simulation results of the
designed acoustic filter functions verify the behavior of the
presented structures in terms of accuracy and robustness.
It must be mentioned at this point that the approximation of
the power-law shelving filters can be also performed using
curve-fitting-based tools, as in [23], [29], but in this work the
Oustaloup approximation tool has been utilized in order to
perform a fair comparison between the presented structures.
The proposed concept can be also applied in the area of
control systems, because shelving filters are the equivalents
of the lead-lag compensators and this exploitation is a subject
of ongoing research [30]–[33].
FIGURE 20. Monte-Carlo analysis results of the phase at the center
frequency f0 = 1 kHz of a high-pass power-law (α = 0.506) shelving filter. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The publication of this article has been financed by the
Research Committee of the University of Patras.
REFERENCES
[1] J. Corey, Audio Production and Critical Listening: Technical Ear Training.
London, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, 2016.
[2] R. Izhaki, Mixing Audio: Concepts, Practices, and Tools. Evanston, IL,
USA: Routledge, 2017.
[3] F. Fontana and M. Karjalainen, ‘‘Magnitude-complementary filters for
dynamic equalization,’’ in Proc. Conf. Digit. Audio Effects (DAFX),
Limerick, Ireland, 2001, pp. 160–164.
[4] F. Keiler and U. Zolzer, ‘‘Parametric second- and fourth-order shelving
filters for audio applications,’’ in Proc. IEEE 6th Workshop Multimedia
Signal Process., Sep. 2004, pp. 231–234.
[5] M. Holters and U. Zölzer, ‘‘Parametric higher-order shelving filters,’’ in
Proc. 14th Eur. Signal Process. Conf., 2006, pp. 1–4.
[6] A. Fernandez-Vazquez, R. Rosas-Romero, and J. Rodriguez-Asomoza,
‘‘A new method for designing flat shelving and peaking filters based
on allpass filters,’’ in Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Electron., Commun. Comput.
(CONIELECOMP), Feb. 2007, p. 10.
[7] S. Sarkka and A. Huovilainen, ‘‘Accurate discretization of analog audio
FIGURE 21. Input and output waveforms of a high-pass filter power-law filters with application to parametric equalizer design,’’ IEEE Trans. Audio,
shelving filter (α = 0.506), for a 10 mV , 1 kHz input signal. Speech, Langauge Process., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2486–2493, Nov. 2011.
[8] V. Välimäki and J. Reiss, ‘‘All about audio equalization: Solutions and
frontiers,’’ Appl. Sci., vol. 6, no. 5, p. 129, May 2016.
the gain and phase were 9.6 dB and 39.6◦ , confirming also its [9] L. Fierro, J. Rämö, and V. Välimäki, ‘‘Adaptive loudness compensation in
accuracy in the time domain. music listening,’’ in Proc. Sound Music Comput. Conf., 2019, pp. 135–142.
[10] Acoustics–Normal Equal-Loudness Level Contours, Standard I. 226:2003, [32] A. A. Dastjerdi, N. Saikumar, and S. H. HosseinNia, ‘‘Tuning guide-
International Standards Organization (ISO), 1987. lines for fractional order PID controllers: Rules of thumb,’’ Mechatronics,
[11] G. Tsirimokou, C. Psychalinos, and A. Elwakil, Design of CMOS Analog vol. 56, pp. 26–36, Dec. 2018.
Integrated Fractional-Order Circuits: Applications in Medicine and Biol- [33] S. H. HosseinNia and N. Saikumar, ‘‘Fractional-order precision motion
ogy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017. control for mechatronic applications,’’ in Handbook of Fractional Calculus
[12] G. A. Haidar, R. A. Z. Daou, and X. Moreau, ‘‘Synthesis of a fractional With Applications, vol. 6. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH,
order audio boost filter,’’ in Proc. 29th Int. Conf. Microelectron. (ICM), 2019, pp. 339–356.
Dec. 2017, pp. 1–5.
[13] G. Tsirimokou, C. Psychalinos, A. S. Elwakil, and K. N. Salama, ‘‘Elec-
tronically tunable fully integrated fractional-order resonator,’’ IEEE Trans.
Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 166–170, Feb. 2017.
[14] F. Schultz, N. Hahn, and S. Spors, ‘‘Shelving filter cascade with adjustable
STAVROULA KAPOULEA (Student Member,
transition slope and bandwidth,’’ in Audio Engineering Society Convention,
IEEE) received the B.Sc. degree in physics and
vol. 148. New York, NY, USA: Audio Engineering Society, 2020.
the M.Sc. degree in electronics from the University
[15] A. S. Mohapatra and K. Biswas, ‘‘A fractional order notch filter to com-
pensate the attenuation-loss due to change in order of the circuit,’’ IEEE
of Patras, Greece, in 2016 and 2018, respectively.
Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 655–666, Feb. 2020. She is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree with
[16] O. Sladok, J. Koton, D. Kubanek, J. Dvorak, and C. Psychalinos, ‘‘Pseudo- the Analog Integrated Circuits Design Research
differential (2 + α)-order Butterworth frequency filter,’’ IEEE Access, Group, Electronics Laboratory, Department of
vol. 9, pp. 92178–92188, 2021. Physics, University of Patras, Greece. Her main
[17] D. Lin, X. Liao, L. Dong, R. Yang, S. S. Yu, H. Ho-Ching Iu, T. Fernando, research interests include the design and applica-
and Z. Li, ‘‘Experimental study of fractional-order RC circuit model using tions of fractional-order circuits.
the caputo and caputo-fabrizio derivatives,’’ IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I,
Reg. Papers, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1034–1044, Mar. 2021.
[18] S. Kapoulea, C. Psychalinos, and A. S. Elwakil, ‘‘Fractional-order shelving
filter designs for acoustic applications,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits
Syst. (ISCAS), Oct. 2020, pp. 1–5. ABDULLAH YESIL (Member, IEEE) received
[19] L. Safari, G. Barile, V. Stornelli, and G. Ferri, ‘‘An overview on the second the B.Sc., M.Sc., and Ph.D. degrees in elec-
generation voltage conveyor: Features, design and applications,’’ IEEE trical and electronics engineering from Istanbul
Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 547–551, Apr. 2018. University, in 2009, 2011, and 2016, respec-
[20] G. Barile, V. Stornelli, G. Ferri, L. Safari, and E. D’Amico, ‘‘A new rail- tively. He is currently an Associate Professor
to-rail second generation voltage conveyor,’’ Electronics, vol. 8, no. 11,
with the Department of Electrical and Electronics
p. 1292, Nov. 2019.
Engineering, Bandirma Onyedi Eylül University,
[21] L. Safari, G. Barile, G. Ferri, and V. Stornelli, ‘‘Traditional op-amp and new
Balikesir, Turkey. He has more than 60 publica-
VCII: A comparison on analog circuits applications,’’ AEU-Int. J. Electron.
tions in scientific journals, book chapters, or con-
Commun., vol. 110, Oct. 2019, Art. no. 152845.
ference proceedings. His main research interests
[22] A. Yesil and S. Minaei, ‘‘New simple transistor realizations of second-
include active network synthesis, current-mode circuit designs, low-noise
generation voltage conveyor,’’ Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl., vol. 48, no. 11,
pp. 2023–2038, Nov. 2020. implementation of continuous time filters, MOS-only filter designs, mem-
[23] S. Kapoulea, C. Psychalinos, and A. S. Elwakil, ‘‘Power law filters: A new
ristor emulators, and electronic circuits for computer-aided design.
class of fractional-order filters without a fractional-order Laplacian opera-
tor,’’ AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun., vol. 129, Feb. 2021, Art. no. 153537.
[24] G. Tsirimokou, ‘‘A systematic procedure for deriving RC networks of
fractional-order elements emulators using Matlab,’’ AEU-Int. J. Electron.
Commun., vol. 78, pp. 7–14, Aug. 2017. COSTAS PSYCHALINOS (Senior Member, IEEE)
[25] S. Kapoulea, C. Psychalinos, and A. S. Elwakil, ‘‘Simple implementations received the B.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in physics
of fractional-order driving-point impedances: Application to biological and electronics from the University of Patras,
tissue models,’’ AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun., vol. 137, Jul. 2021, Greece, in 1986 and 1991, respectively. From
Art. no. 153784. 1993 to 1995, he worked as a Postdoctoral
[26] A. Oustaloup, F. Levron, B. Mathieu, and F. M. Nanot, ‘‘Frequency-band Researcher with the VLSI Design Laboratory, Uni-
complex noninteger differentiator: Characterization and synthesis,’’ IEEE versity of Patras. From 1996 to 2000, he was an
Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Fundam. Theory Appl., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 25–39, Adjunct Lecturer at the Department of Computer
Jan. 2000. Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras.
[27] L. Safari, E. Yuce, S. Minaei, G. Ferri, and V. Stornelli, ‘‘A second- From 2000 to 2004, he worked as an Assistant
generation voltage conveyor (VCII)–based simulated grounded inductor,’’ Professor at the Electronics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Aristotle
Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1180–1193, Jul. 2020.
University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Since 2004, he has been a Faculty
[28] S. Kapoulea, C. Psychalinos, and A. S. Elwakil, ‘‘Minimization of spread Member at the Electronics Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of
of time-constants and scaling factors in fractional-order differentiator and
Patras, and currently, he is a Full Professor. His research interests include the
integrator realizations,’’ Circuits, Syst., Signal Process., vol. 37, no. 12,
development of CMOS analog integrated circuits, including fractional-order
pp. 5647–5663, Dec. 2018.
circuits and systems, continuous and discrete-time analog filters, amplifiers,
[29] S. Kapoulea, G. Tsirimokou, C. Psychalinos, and A. S. Elwakil, ‘‘Employ-
ment of the Padé approximation for implementing fractional-order lead/lag
and low voltage/low power building blocks for analog signal processing.
compensators,’’ AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun., vol. 120, Jun. 2020, He is a member of the Nonlinear Circuits and Systems Technical Committee
Art. no. 153203. of the IEEE CAS Society. He serves as the Editor-in-Chief for the Circuit and
[30] M. S. Tavazoei and M. Tavakoli-Kakhki, ‘‘Compensation by fractional- Signal Processing Section of the Electronics journal (MDPI). He serves as an
order phase-lead/lag compensators,’’ IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 8, Area Editor for the International Journal of Electronics and Communications
no. 5, pp. 319–329, Mar. 2014. (AEUE) journal and an Editor for the International Journal of Circuit Theory
[31] C. Muñiz-Montero, L. A. Sánchez-Gaspariano, C. Sánchez-López, and Applications. He is an Associate Editor of the Circuits, Systems, and
V. R. González-Díaz, and E. Tlelo-Cuautle, ‘‘On the electronic realiza- Signal Processing Journal and the Journal of Advanced Research. He is
tions of fractional-order phase-lead-lag compensators with OpAmps and a member of the Editorial Board of the Microelectronics Journal, Analog
FPAAs,’’ in Fractional Order Control and Synchronization of Chaotic Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing journal, Fractal and Fractional
Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 131–164. journal, and Journal of Low Power Electronics and Applications.
SHAHRAM MINAEI (Senior Member, IEEE) linear dynamics, chaos theory, and fractional-order circuits and systems with
received the B.Sc. degree in electrical and elec- diverse applications ranging from the modeling of oscillatory networks and
tronics engineering from the Iran University of nonlinear behavior in electronic circuits and plasma physics to modeling
Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran, of energy storage devices, bio-materials, and biological tissues. He has
in 1993, and the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in been a member of the IEEE Technical Committee on Nonlinear Circuits
electronics and communication engineering from and Systems, since 2000. He was a recipient of the Egyptian Government
Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Istanbul, First Class Medal for achievements in engineering sciences, in 2015, and
Turkey, in 1997 and 2001, respectively. He is cur- the UAE President Award (Khalifa Award), in 2020. He is an International
rently a Professor with the Department of Elec- Observer in the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST)
tronics and Communications Engineering, Dogus action on fractional-order system analysis synthesis and their importance
University, Istanbul. He has more than 130 publications in scientific for future design (CA15225) and an Expert with the United Nations Devel-
SCI-indexed journals. His published works have received more than opment Program (UNDP). He was on the Editorial Board of the IEEE
4500 citations and his H-index is 38 in Google Scholar. His research JOURNAL ON EMERGING AND SELECTED TOPICS IN CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS and an
interests include current-mode circuits and analog signal processing. He is Associate Editor for the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS—
the Editor-in-Chief of the AEÜ-International Journal of Electronics and I: REGULAR PAPERS. He serves as the Editor-in-Chief for the International
Communications. Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications (Wiley) and an Associate Edi-
tor for the International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications
(AEUE, Elsevier).