7-12-24 Sullivan Federal Lawsuit
7-12-24 Sullivan Federal Lawsuit
MATTHEW SULLIVAN,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 24-cv-4116
v.
Defendants.
COMPLAINT AT LAW
MARSH LLC, and complaining of the Defendants, Knox County employees MELINDA
ALLGEYER and KARLA JOHNSON, and KNOX COUNTY, and states the following:
1. This action arises under the Constitution of the United States, particularly the
Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, under the laws of
the United States, particularly the Civil Rights Act, Title 42 of the United States Code, Sections
1983 and 1988, and under the laws of the State of Illinois.
2. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under the provisions of Title 28 of the
United States Code, 1331 and 1343. Plaintiff also invokes the supplemental jurisdiction of this
1
3. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Title 28 of the United States
Code §§ 1331 and 1367, as Plaintiff asserts claims under federal law and the state law claims arise
out of the same facts as the Federal claims. Venue is proper under Title 28 of the United States
PARTIES
5. Defendant MELINDA ALLGEYER is sued in her individual capacity and was at all
times relevant, a clerk employed by KNOX COUNTY, and was acting within the scope of her
agency, service and/or employment with KNOX COUNTY, and was acting under color of the
6. Defendant KARLA JOHNSON is sued in her individual capacity and was at all
times relevant, an employee of KNOX COUNTY, and was acting within the scope of her agency,
service and/or employment with KNOX COUNTY, and was acting under color of the statutes,
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
8. On or about December 14, 2022, Matthew was in his mother’s house located at 924
N. Farnham Street, Galesburg, IL 61401. He was helping remove items from the house because it
2
9. Matthew requested the help of his friends Emily Philbee and David Lindsey to
10. In the process of moving the items out of the house, Matthew called the Knox
County Courthouse to request information on the return of bond money for a previously dismissed
case. Matthew put his phone on speaker, and Philbee and Lindsey were able to listen to the
conversation.
11. Defendant Allgeyer, the clerk who took his call, informed Matthew that she could
not properly hear him. Philbee advised Matthew to hang up the phone, turn off the generator they
12. Matthew stepped outside the house and called back, putting the phone on speaker
again, and stayed outside, accompanied by Philbee and Lindsey, who could hear the conversation.
13. Matthew inquired about his bond money again, and Defendant Allgeyer indicated
Matthew’s bond money was used to pay outstanding financial obligations as per a judge’s order.
14. Matthew explained to Defendant Allgeyer that the fines had already been sent to
collections and requested his money back. Defendant Allgeyer responded that the Judge had
15. Philbee, who was listening to the conversation, said that “if the case was dismissed
16. Defendant Allgeyer responded that “the judge can do whatever he wants.”
17. Matthew was not satisfied with this answer and said “Well, then I’m going to come
3
18. Defendant Allgeyer scoffed, and said, “Good luck with that. Get an attorney” and
hung up.
19. After the phone call, Defendants Allgeyer and Johnson – who was allegedly listening to the
conversation with Allgeyer – informed Galesburg police that Matthew stated, “I will come down
and shoot up the courthouse and sue you guys, the judge, and the Courthouse for taking my
money”.
20. At or around 11:30 a.m., Galesburg police officers arrived at the house and informed
21. Matthew was charged with Felony Disorderly Conduct for threatening a public
official and for harassment through electronic communications. He spent 10 days in the Knox
22. Philbee and Lindsey both signed affidavits describing the incident and what they
23. On March 8, 2023, the Knox County State’s Attorney’s Office filed a Statement of
Nolle Prosequi, indicating they lacked sufficient evidence to sustain their burden of proof.
24. The case against Matthew was dismissed in a manner in favor of Matthew and
25. Matthew lost his job as a result of his arrest, incarceration, and prosecution.
4
27. Defendants caused Matthew to be arrested without probable cause to believe he had
committed any crime or offense, in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
30. Defendants initiated and continued criminal charges against Matthew without
probable cause and with malice, in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
31. Defendants accused Matthew of criminal activity and exerted influence to initiate,
continue, and perpetuate judicial proceedings against Matthew without any probable cause for
doing so, in violation of his rights secured by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S.
Constitution.
32. The criminal case against Matthew was dismissed on March 8, 2023, in a manner
35. At all relevant times, Defendant Knox County was the indemnitor of Defendants
5
36. Defendants committed the acts alleged above under color of law and in the scope of
37. Illinois law provides that government entities are directed to pay any tort judgment
for any damages for which employees are liable within the scope of their employment activities.
38. Should one or more Defendants be found liable on one or more of the claims set
forth above, Plaintiff demands, pursuant to Illinois law, that their indemnitor, Defendant Knox
County, be found liable for any judgment plaintiff obtains against any of the defendants.
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff Matthew Sullivan prays for judgment against all
defendants in a fair and reasonable amount, including compensatory and punitive damages,
attorney fees and costs, and for any additional relief this Court deems just and proper.
JURY DEMAND
Respectfully submitted,
MATTHEW SULLIVAN