Software Testing Interview Questions and Answers
Software Testing Interview Questions and Answers
com
+918130877931
Software Testing
Interview
Questions and
Answers
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
1. What is a Bug?
When actual result deviates from the expected result while testing a software
application or product then it results into a defect. Hence, any deviation from the
specification mentioned in the product functional specification document is a
defect. In different organizations it’s called a Bug.
2. What is a Defect?
3. What is CMM?
The Capability Maturity Model for Software (CMM or SW-CMM) is a model for
judging the maturity of the software processes of an organization and for
identifying the key practices that are required to increase the maturity of these
processes.
An approach to integration testing where the lowest level components are tested
first, then used to facilitate the testing of higher level components. The process is
repeated until the component at the top of the hierarchy is tested.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Test which focus on the boundary or limit conditions of the software being tested.
(Some of these tests are stress tests).
Testing of all branches in the program source code is called Branch Testing.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
A testing phase where the tester tries to 'break' the system by randomly trying the
system's functionality is called Ad Hoc testing. This can include negative testing
also.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
The use of software tools, such as automated testing tools, to improve software
quality is called Automated Software Quality (ASQ).
Testing employing software tools which execute tests without manual intervention
is called Automated Testing. Can be applied in GUI, performance, API, etc. testing.
The use of software to control the execution of tests, the comparison of actual
outcomes to predicted outcomes, the setting up of test preconditions, and other
test control and test reporting functions.
A white box test case design technique that uses the algorithmic flow of the
program to design tests.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
The point at which some deliverable produced during the software engineering
process is put under formal change control.
Few things that you should be doing on the first day of your job are
A test suite that exercises the full functionality of a product but does not test
features in detail is called Breadth Testing.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
A test tool that records test input as it is sent to the software under test. The input
cases stored can then be used to reproduce the test at a later time. Most
commonly applied to GUI test tools.
An analysis method that determines which parts of the software have been
executed (covered) by the test case suite and which parts have not been
executed and therefore may require additional attention.
A formal testing technique where the programmer reviews source code with a
group who ask questions analyzing the program logic, analyzing the code with
respect to a checklist of historically common programming errors, and analyzing
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
its compliance with coding standards. Know more about the Inspection in
software testing.
A formal testing technique where source code is traced by a group with a small
set of test cases, while the state of program variables is manually monitored, to
analyze the programmer's logic and assumptions. Know more about Walkthrough
in software testing.
Multi-user testing geared towards determining the effects of accessing the same
application code, module or database records. Identifies and measures the level
of locking, deadlocking and use of single-threaded code and locking
semaphores.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Testing of programs or procedures used to convert data from existing systems for
use in replacement systems.
A database that contains definitions of all data items defined during analysis.
The process of finding and removing the causes of software failures is called
Debugging.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
When actual result deviates from the expected result while testing a software
application or product then it results into a defect.
A test that exercises a feature of a product in full detail is called Depth testing.
Testing software through executing it is called Dynamic testing. Also know about
Static Testing.
A device, computer program, or system that accepts the same inputs and
produces the same outputs in a given system is called Emulator.
Checks for memory leaks or other problems that may occur with prolonged
execution.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
A test case design technique for a component in which test cases are designed to
execute representatives from equivalence classes.
Testing which covers all combinations of input values and preconditions for an
element of the software under test.
A document that describes in detail the characteristics of the product with regard
to its intended features is called Functional Specification.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
A combination of Black Box and White Box testing methodologies is called Gray
box testing. Testing a piece of software against its specification but using some
knowledge of its internal workings.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
A group review quality improvement process for written material. It consists of two
aspects; product (document itself) improvement and process improvement (of
both document production and inspection).
Installation testing is a kind of quality assurance work in the software industry that
focuses on what customers will need to do to install and set up the new software
successfully. The testing process may involve full, partial or upgrades
install/uninstall processes.
This term refers to making software specifically designed for a specific locality.
A white box testing technique that exercises program loops in order to validate
them.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Testing a system or an Application on the fly, i.e just few tests here and there to
ensure the system or an application does not crash out.
Testing aimed at showing software does not work. This is also known as "test to
fail". See also Positive Testing.
Testing in which all paths are in the program source code are tested at least
once.
Testing aimed at showing software works. This is also known as "test to pass".
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
The operational techniques and the activities used to fulfil and verify
requirements of quality.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
A pre-release version, which contains the desired functionality of the final version,
but which needs to be tested for bugs (which ideally should be removed before
the final version is released).
Testing which confirms that the program can restrict access to authorized
personnel and that the authorized personnel can access the functions available
to their security level.
In Software testing context, smoke testing refers to testing the basic functionality
of the build.
Running a system at high load for a prolonged period of time is called Soak
testing. For example; run several times more transactions in an entire day (or
night) than would be expected in a busy day, to identify the performance
problems that appear after a large number of transactions have been executed.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
A deliverable that describes all data, functional and behavioural requirements, all
constraints, and all validation requirements for software/
Testing that verifies the program under test stores data files in the correct
directories and that it reserves sufficient space to prevent unexpected
termination resulting from lack of space. This is external storage as opposed to
internal storage.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Testing that attempts to discover defects that are properties of the entire system
rather than of its individual components is called System testing.
Quality assurance involves the entire software development process and testing
involves operation of a system or application to evaluate the results under certain
conditions. QA is oriented to prevention and Testing is oriented to detection.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Memory leaks means incomplete de-allocation - are bugs that happen very
often. Buffer overflow means data sent as input to the server that overflows the
boundaries of the input area, thus causing the server to misbehave.
108. What are the major differences between stress testing, load testing,
Volume testing?
Stress testing means increasing the load and checking the performance at each
level. Load testing means at a time giving more load by the expectation and
checking the performance at that level.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Testing which covers all combinations of input values and preconditions for an
element of the software under test.
A document that describes in detail the characteristics of the product with regard
to its intended features is called Functional Specification.
Test Case is a commonly used term for a specific test. This is usually the smallest
unit of testing. A Test Case will consist of information such as requirements
testing, test steps, verification steps, prerequisites, outputs, test environment, etc.
A set of inputs, execution preconditions, and expected outcomes developed for a
particular objective, such as to exercise a particular program path or to verify
compliance with a specific requirement. Test Driven Development? Testing
methodology associated with Agile Programming in which every chunk of code is
covered by unit tests, which must all pass all the time, in an effort to eliminate
unit-level and regression bugs during development.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Practitioners of TDD write a lot of tests, i.e. an equal number of lines of test code to
the size of the production code.
A program or test tool used to execute a test. Also known as a Test Harness.
The hardware and software environment in which tests will be run, and any other
software with which the software under test interacts when under test including
stubs and test drivers.
A program or test tool used to execute tests. Also known as a Test Driver.
A document providing detailed instructions for the execution of one or more test
cases is called test Procedure.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Test script is commonly used to refer to the instructions for a particular test that
will be carried out by an automated test tool.
Computer programs used for the testing of a system, a component of the system,
or its documentation is called a test tool.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
being simulated by stubs. Tested components are then used to test lower level
components. The process is repeated until the lowest level components have
been tested.
Testing the ease with which users can learn and use a product.
Use case is the specification of tests that are conducted from the end-user
perspective. Use cases tend to focus on operating software as an end-user would
conduct their day-to-day activities.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
The process of determining whether or not the products of a given phase of the
software development cycle meet the implementation steps and can be traced
to the incoming objectives established during the previous phase.
One of the most common, but unfortunate misuse of terminology is treating “load
testing” and “stress testing” as synonymous. The consequence of this ignorant
semantic abuse is usually that the system is neither properly “load tested” nor
subjected to a meaningful stress test. Stress testing is subjecting a system to an
unreasonable load while denying it the resources (e.g., RAM, disc, mips, interrupts,
etc.) needed to process that load. The idea is to stress a system to the breaking
point in order to find bugs that will make that break potentially harmful. The
system is not expected to process the overload without adequate resources, but
to behave (e.g., fail) in a decent manner (e.g., not corrupting or losing data). Bugs
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
and failure modes discovered under stress testing may or may not be repaired
depending on the application, the failure mode, consequences, etc. The load
(incoming transaction stream) in stress testing is often deliberately distorted so
as to force the system into resource depletion. Load testing is subjecting a system
to a statistically representative (usually) load. The two main reasons for using
such loads is in support of software reliability testing and in performance testing.
The term 'load testing' by itself is too vague and imprecise to warrant use. For
example, do you mean representative load,' 'overload,' 'high load,' etc. In
performance testing, load is varied from a minimum (zero) to the maximum level
the system can sustain without running out of resources or having, transactions
>suffer (application-specific) excessive delay. A third use of the term is as a test
whose objective is to determine the maximum sustainable load the system can
handle. In this usage, 'load testing' is merely testing at the highest transaction
arrival rate in performance testing.
QA is more a preventive thing, ensuring quality in the company and therefore the
product rather than just testing the product for software bugs? TESTING means
'quality control' QUALITY CONTROL measures the quality of a product QUALITY
ASSURANCE measures the quality of processes used to create a quality product.
Tester : developer ratios range from 10:1 to 1:10. There's no simple answer. It
depends on so many things, Amount of reused code, number and type of
interfaces, platform, quality goals, etc. It also can depend on the development
model. The more specs, the less testers. The roles can play a big part also. Does
QA own beta? Do you include process auditors or planning activities? These
figures can all vary very widely depending on how you define 'tester' and
'developer'. In some organizations, a 'tester' is anyone who happens to be testing
software at the time -- such as their own. In other organizations, a 'tester' is only a
member of an independent test group. It is better to ask about the test labour
content than it is to ask about the tester/developer ratio. The test labour content,
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
- A lot depends on the size of the organization and the risks involved. For large
organizations with high-risk (in terms of lives or property) projects, serious
management buy-in is required and a formalized QA process is necessary. -
Where the risk is lower, management and organizational buy-in and QA
implementation may be a slower, step-at-a-time process. QA processes should
be balanced with productivity so as to keep bureaucracy from getting out of
hand. - For small groups or projects, a more ad-hoc process may be appropriate,
depending on the type of customers and projects. A lot will depend on team leads
or managers, feedback to developers, and ensuring adequate communications
among customers, managers, developers, and testers. - In all cases the most
value for effort will be in requirements management processes, with a goal of
clear, complete, testable requirement specifications or expectations.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
'Good code' is a code that works, is bug free, and is readable and maintainable.
Some organizations have coding 'standards' that all developers are supposed to
adhere to, but everyone has different ideas about what's best, or what is too many
or too few rules. There are also various theories and metrics, such as McCabe
Complexity metrics. It should be kept in mind that excessive use of standards and
rules can stifle productivity and creativity. 'Peer reviews', 'buddy checks' code
analysis tools, etc. can be used to check for problems and enforce standards. For
C and C++ coding, here are some typical ideas to consider in setting
rules/standards; these may or may not apply to a particular situation: - minimize
or eliminate use of global variables. - use descriptive function and method names
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
- use both upper and lower case, avoid abbreviations, use as many
characters as necessary to be adequately descriptive (use of more than 20
characters is not out of line); be consistent in naming conventions. - use
descriptive variable names - use both upper and lower case, avoid abbreviations,
use as many characters as necessary to be adequately descriptive (use of more
than 20 characters is not out of line); be consistent in naming conventions. -
function and method sizes should be minimized; less than 100 lines of code is
good, less than 50 lines is preferable. - function descriptions should be clearly
spelled out in comments preceding a function's code.- organize code for
readability.
'Design' could refer to many things, but often refers to 'functional design' or
'internal design'. Good internal design is indicated by software code whose overall
structure is clear, understandable, easily modifiable, and maintainable; is robust
with sufficient error-handling and status logging capability; and works correctly
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
A good test engineer has a 'test to break' attitude, an ability to take the point of
view of the customer, a strong desire for quality, and an attention to detail. Tact
and diplomacy are useful in maintaining a cooperative relationship with
developers, and an ability to communicate with both technical (developers) and
non-technical (customers, management) people is useful. Previous software
development experience can be helpful as it provides a deeper understanding of
the software development process, gives the tester an appreciation for the
developers' point of view, and reduce the learning curve in automated test tool
programming. Judgment skills are needed to assess high- risk areas of an
application on which to focus testing efforts when time is limited.
The same qualities a good tester has are useful for a QA engineer. Additionally,
they must be able to understand the entire software development process and
how it can fit into the business approach and goals of the organization.
Communication skills and the ability to understand various sides of issues are
important. In organizations in the early stages of implementing QA processes,
patience and diplomacy are especially needed. An ability to find problems as well
as to see 'what's missing' is important for inspections and reviews.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
efficient way can be a difficult effort; different methods are available depending
on the particular project. Many books are available that describe various
approaches to this task. Care should be taken to involve ALL of a project's
significant 'customers' in the requirements process. 'Customers' could be in-
house personnel or out, and could include end- users, customer acceptance
testers, customer contract officers, customer management, future software
maintenance engineers, salespeople, etc. Anyone who could later derail the
project if their expectations aren't met should be included if possible.
Organizations vary considerably in their handling of requirements specifications.
Ideally, the requirements are spelled out in a document with statements such as
'The product shall '. 'Design' specifications should not be confused with
'requirements'; design specifications should be traceable back to the
requirements. In some organizations requirements may end up in high level
project plans, functional specification documents, in design documents, or in
other documents at various levels of detail. No matter what they are called, some
type of documentation with detailed requirements will be needed by testers in
order to properly plan and execute tests. Without such documentation, there will
be no clear-cut way to determine if a software application is performing correctly.
148. What steps are needed to develop and run software tests?
The following are some of the steps to consider: - Obtain requirements, functional
design, and internal design specifications and other necessary documents -
Obtain budget and schedule requirements - Determine project-related personnel
and their responsibilities, reporting requirements, required standards and
processes (such as release processes, change processes, etc.) - Identify
application's higher-risk aspects, set priorities, and determine scope and
limitations of tests - Determine test approaches and methods - unit, integration,
functional, system, load, usability tests, etc. - Determine test environment
requirements (hardware, software, communications, etc.) -Determine testware
requirements (record/playback tools, coverage analyzers, test tracking,
problem/bug tracking, etc.) - Determine test input data requirements - Identify
tasks, those responsible for tasks, and labor requirements - Set schedule
estimates, timelines, milestones - Determine input equivalence classes, boundary
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
value analyses, error classes - Prepare test plan document and have needed
reviews/approvals - Write test cases - Have needed
reviews/inspections/approvals of test cases - Prepare test environment and
testware, obtain needed user manuals/reference documents/configuration
guides/installation guides, set up test tracking processes, set up logging and
archiving processes, set up or obtain test input data - Obtain and install software
releases – Perform tests - Evaluate and report results - Track problems/bugs and
fixes - Retest as needed - Maintain and update test plans, test cases, test
environment, and testware through life cycle
The best bet in this situation is for the testers to go through the process of
reporting whatever bugs or blocking-type problems initially show up, with the
focus being on critical bugs. Since this type of problem can severely affect
schedules, and indicates deeper problems in the software development process
(such as insufficient unit testing or insufficient integration testing, poor design,
improper build or release procedures, etc.) managers should be notified, and
provided with some documentation as evidence of the problem. Know more
about Severity and Priority
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Use risk analysis to determine where testing should be focused. Since it's rarely
possible to test every possible aspect of an application, every possible
combination of events, every dependency, or everything that could go wrong, risk
analysis is appropriate to most software development projects.
This requires judgement skills, common sense, and experience. (If warranted,
formal methods are also available.) Considerations can include: - Which
functionality is most important to the project's intended purpose? - Which
functionality is most visible to the user? - Which functionality has the largest
safety impact? - Which functionality has the largest financial impact on users? -
Which aspects of the application are most important to the customer? - Which
aspects of the application can be tested early in the development cycle? - Which
parts of the code are most complex, and thus most subject to errors? - Which
parts of the application were developed in rush or panic mode? - Which aspects
of similar/related previous projects caused problems? - Which aspects of
similar/related previous projects had large maintenance expenses? - Which parts
of the requirements and design are unclear or poorly thought out? - What do the
developers think are the highest-risk aspects of the application? - What kinds of
problems would cause the worst publicity? - What kinds of problems would cause
the most customer service complaints?- What kinds of tests could easily cover
multiple functionalities? - Which tests will have the best high-risk-coverage to
time-required ratio?
This is a common problem and a major headache. - Work with the project's
stakeholders early on to understand how requirements might change so that
alternate test plans and strategies can be worked out in advance, if possible. - It's
helpful if the application's initial design allows for some adaptability so that later
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
changes do not require redoing the application from scratch. - If the code is well-
commented and well-documented this makes changes easier for the
developers.- Use rapid prototyping whenever possible to help customers feel sure
of their requirements and minimize changes. - The project's initial schedule
should allow for some extra time commensurate with the possibility of changes.-
Try to move new requirements to a 'Phase 2' version of an application, while using
the original requirements for the 'Phase 1' version. - Negotiate to allow only easily-
implemented new requirements into the project, while moving more difficult new
requirements into future versions of the application. - Be sure that customers and
management understand the scheduling impacts, inherent risks, and costs of
significant requirements changes. Then let management or the customers (not
the developers or testers) decide if the changes are warranted - after all, that's
their job. - Balance the effort put into setting up automated testing with the
expected effort required to re-do them to deal with changes. - Try to design some
flexibility into automated test scripts. - Focus initial automated testing on
application aspects that are most likely to remain unchanged. - Devote
appropriate effort to risk analysis of changes to minimize regression testing
needs. - Design some flexibility into test cases (this is not easily done; the best bet
might be to minimize the detail in the test cases, or set up only higher-level
generic-type test plans) - Focus less on detailed test plans and test cases and
more on ad hoc testing (with an understanding of the added risk that this entails).
154. What if the project isn't big enough to justify extensive testing?
Consider the impact of project errors, not the size of the project. However, if
extensive testing is still not justified, risk analysis is again needed and the same
considerations as described previously in 'What if there isn't enough time for
thorough testing?' apply. The tester might then do ad hoc testing, or write up a
limited test plan based on the risk analysis.
155. What if the application has functionality that wasn't in the requirements?
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Web sites are essentially client/server applications - with web servers and
'browser' clients. Consideration should be given to the interactions between html
pages, TCP/IP communications, Internet connections, firewalls, applications that
run in web pages (such as applets, javascript, plug-in applications), and
applications that run on the server side (such as cgi scripts, database interfaces,
logging applications, dynamic page generators, asp, etc.). Additionally, there are
a wide variety of servers and browsers, various versions of each, small but
sometimes significant differences between them, variations in connection speeds,
rapidly changing technologies, and multiple standards and protocols. The end
result is that testing for web sites can become a major ongoing effort. Other
considerations might include: - What are the expected loads on the server (e.g.,
number of hits per unit time?), and what kind of performance is required under
such loads (such as web server response time, database query response times).
What kinds of tools will be needed for performance testing (such as web testing
tools, other tools already in house that can be adapted, web robot downloading
tools, etc.)? - Who is the target audience? What kind of browsers will they be
using? What kind of connection speed will they by using? Are they intra-
organization (thus with likely high connection speeds and similar browsers) or
Internet-wide (thus with a wide variety of connection speeds and browser types)?
- What kind of performance is expected on the client side (e.g., how fast should
pages appear, how fast should animations, applets, etc. load and run)? - Will
down time for server and content maintenance/upgrades be allowed? How
much? - What kinds of security (firewalls, encryptions, passwords, etc.) will be
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
required and what is it expected to do? How can it be tested? - How reliable are
the site's Internet connections required to be? And how does that affect backup
system or redundant connection requirements and testing? - What processes will
be required to manage updates to the web site's content, and what are the
requirements for maintaining, tracking, and controlling page content, graphics,
links, etc.? - Which HTML specification will be adhered to?
How strictly? What variations will be allowed for targeted browsers? - Will there be
any standards or requirements for page appearance and/or graphics throughout
a site or parts of a site?? - How will internal and external links be validated and
updated? how often? - Can testing be done on the production system, or will a
separate test system be required? How are browser caching, variations in browser
option settings, dial-up connection variability, and real-world internet 'traffic
congestion' problems to be accounted for in testing?- How extensive or
customized are the server logging and reporting requirements; are they
considered an integral part of the system and do they require testing?- How are
cgi programs, applets, java scripts, ActiveX components, etc. to be maintained,
tracked, controlled, and tested? - Pages should be 3-5 screens max unless
content is tightly focused on a single topic. If larger, provide internal links within
the page. - The page layouts and design elements should be consistent
throughout a site, so that it's clear to the user that they're still within a site. - Pages
should be as browser-independent as possible, or pages should be provided or
generated based on the browser-type. - All pages should have links external to
the page; there should be no dead-end pages. - The page owner, revision date,
and a link to a contact person or organization should be included on each page.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
- Possibly. For small projects, the time needed to learn and implement them
may not be worth it. For larger projects, or on-going long-term projects they can
be valuable. - A common type of automated tool is the 'record/playback' type. For
example, a tester could click through all combinations of menu choices, dialog
box choices, buttons, etc. in an application GUI and have them 'recorded' and the
results logged by a tool. The 'recording' is typically in the form of text based on a
scripting language that is interpretable by the testing tool. If new buttons are
added, or some underlying code in the application is changed, etc. the
application can then be retested by just 'playing back' the 'recorded' actions, and
comparing the logging results to check effects of the changes. The problem with
such tools is that if there are continual changes to the system being tested, the
'recordings' may have to be changed so much that it becomes very time-
consuming to continuously update the scripts.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
163. What's the difference between black box and white box testing?
Black-box and white-box are test design methods. Black-box test design treats
the system as a “black-box”, so it doesn't explicitly use knowledge of the internal
structure. Black-box test design is usually described as focusing on testing
functional requirements. Synonyms for black-box include: behavioural, functional,
opaque-box, and closed-box. White-box test design allows one to peek inside
the “box”, and it focuses specifically on using internal knowledge of the software
to guide the selection of test data. Synonyms for white-box include: structural,
glass-box and clear-box. While black-box and white-box are terms that are still in
popular use, many people prefer the terms 'behavioural' and 'structural'.
Behavioural test design is slightly different from black-box test design because
the use of internal knowledge isn't strictly forbidden, but it's still discouraged. In
practice, it hasn't proven useful to use a single test design method. One has to use
a mixture of different methods so that they aren't hindered by the limitations of a
particular one. Some call this 'gray-box' or 'translucent-box' test design, but others
wish we'd stop talking about boxes altogether. It is important to understand that
these methods are used during the test design phase, and their influence is hard
to see in the tests once they're implemented. Note that any level of testing (unit
testing, system testing, etc.) can use any test design methods. Unit testing is
usually associated with structural test design, but this is because testers usually
don't have well-defined requirements at the unit level to validate.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Black box testing can be considered which is not based on any knowledge of
internal design or code. Tests are based on requirements and functionality. White
box testing can also be considered which is based on knowledge of the internal
logic of an application's code. Tests are based on coverage of code statements,
branches, paths, conditions. Unit testing - the most 'micro' scale of testing; to test
particular functions or code modules. Unit testing is typically done by the
programmer and not by testers, as it requires detailed knowledge of the internal
program design and code. Not always easily done unless the application has a
well-designed architecture with tight code; may require developing test driver
modules or test harnesses. incremental integration testing - continuous testing of
an application as new functionality is added; requires that various aspects of an
application's functionality be independent enough to work separately before all
parts of the program are completed, or that test drivers be developed as needed;
done by programmers or by testers. integration testing - testing of combined
parts of an application to determine if they function together correctly. The 'parts'
can be code modules, individual applications, client and server applications on a
network, etc. This type of testing is especially relevant to client/server and
distributed systems. functional testing - black-box type testing geared to
functional requirements of an application; this type of testing should be done by
testers. This doesn't mean that the programmers shouldn't check that their code
works before releasing it (which of course applies to any stage of testing.) system
testing - black-box type testing that is based on overall requirements
specifications; covers all combined parts of a system. end-to- end testing -
similar to system testing; the 'macro' end of the test scale; involves testing of a
complete application environment in a situation that mimics real-world use, such
as interacting with a database, using network communications, or interacting
with other hardware, applications, or systems if appropriate. sanity testing or
smoke testing - typically an initial testing effort to determine if a new software
version is performing well enough to accept it for a major testing effort. For
example, if the new software is crashing systems every 5 minutes, bogging down
systems to a crawl, or corrupting databases, the software may not be in a 'sane'
enough condition to warrant further testing in its current state. regression testing
- re-testing after fixes or modifications of the software or its environment. It can
be difficult to determine how much re-testing is needed, especially near the end
of the development cycle. Automated testing tools can be especially useful for
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
User interviews, surveys, video recording of user sessions, and other techniques
can be used. Programmers and testers are usually not appropriate as usability
testers. install/uninstall testing - testing of full, partial, or upgrade install/uninstall
processes. recovery testing - testing how well a system recovers from crashes,
hardware failures, or other catastrophic problems. failover testing - typically used
interchangeably with 'recovery testing' security testing - testing how well the
system protects against unauthorized internal or external access, wilful damage,
etc; may require sophisticated testing techniques. Compatibility testing - testing
how well software performs in a particular hardware/software/operating
system/network/etc. environment. Exploratory testing - often taken to mean a
creative, informal software test that is not based on formal test plans or test
cases; testers may be learning the software as they test it. Ad-hoc testing -
similar to exploratory testing, but often taken to mean that the testers have
significant understanding of the software before testing it. Context-driven testing
- testing driven by an understanding of the environment, culture, and intended
use of software. For example, the testing approach for life-critical medical
equipment software would be completely different than that for a low-cost
computer game. User acceptance testing is done to determine whether the
software is satisfactory to an end-user or customer. Comparison testing is about
comparing software weaknesses and strengths to competing products. Alpha
testing - testing of an application when development is nearing completion;
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
minor design changes may still be made as a result of such testing. Alpha testing
is typically done by end-users or others, not by programmers or testers. Beta
testing - testing when development and testing are essentially completed and
final bugs and problems need to be found before final release. Beta testing is
typically done by end-users or others, not by programmers or testers. mutation
testing - a method for determining if a set of test data or test cases is useful, by
deliberately introducing various code changes ('bugs') and retesting with the
original test data/cases to determine if the 'bugs' are detected. Proper
implementation requires large computational resources.
165. Why is it often hard for management to get serious about quality
assurance?
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
- the end-user may not understand the effects of changes, or may understand
and request them anyway - redesign, rescheduling of engineers, effects on other
projects, work already completed that may have to be redone or thrown out,
hardware requirements that may be affected, etc. If there are many minor
changes or any major changes, known and unknown dependencies among parts
of the project are likely to interact and cause problems, and the complexity of
coordinating changes may result in errors. Enthusiasm of engineering staff may
be affected. In some fast-changing business environments, continuously
modified requirements may be a fact of life. In this case, management must
understand the resulting risks, and QA and test engineers must adapt and plan
for continuous extensive testing to keep the inevitable bugs from running out of
control. 4) Poorly documented code - it's tough to maintain and modify code that
is badly written or poorly documented; the result is bugs. In many organizations
management provides no incentive for programmers to document their code or
write clear, understandable, maintainable code. In fact, it's usually the opposite:
they get points mostly for quickly turning out code, and there's job security if
nobody else can understand it ('if it was hard to write, it should be hard to read').
5) software development tools - visual tools, class libraries, compilers, scripting
tools, etc. often introduce their own bugs or are poorly documented, resulting in
added bugs. Also know about from where do defects and failures in software
testing arise?
A lot depends on the size of the organization and the risks involved. For large
organizations with high- risk (in terms of lives or property) projects, serious
management buy-in is required and a formalized QA process is necessary. Where
the risk is lower, management and organizational buy-in and QA implementation
may be a slower, step-at-a-time process. QA processes should be balanced with
productivity so as to keep bureaucracy from getting out of hand. For small groups
or projects, a more ad-hoc process may be appropriate, depending on the type
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
(c) post-mortems/retrospectives.
To report bugs in excel: S.no, Module Screen/ Section Issue detail, Severity, Priority,
Issue status this is how to report bugs in excel sheet and also set filters on the
Columns attributes. But most of the companies use the share point process of
reporting bugs In this when the project came for testing a module wise detail of
project is inserted to the defect management system they are using. It contains
following field1) Date 2) Issue brief 3) Issue description (used for developer to
regenerate the issue)
4) Issue status (active, resolved, on hold, suspend and not able to regenerate) 5)
Assign to (Names of members allocated to project) 6) Priority (High, medium and
low) 7) severity (Major, medium and low)
169. What are the tables in test plans and test cases?
Test plan is a document that contains the scope, approach, test design and test
strategies. It includes the following:-1) Test case identifier 2) Scope 3) Features to
be tested 4) Features not to be tested. 5) Test strategy. 6) Test Approach 7) Test
Deliverables 8) Responsibilities. 9) Staffing and Training 10) Risk and
Contingencies 11) Approval While A test case is a noted/documented set of
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
170. What are the table contents in test plans and test cases?
Test Plan is a document which is prepared with the details of the testing priority. A
test Plan generally includes: 1) Objective of Testing 2) Scope of Testing 3) Reason
for testing 4) Timeframe 5) Environment 6) Entry and exit criteria 7) Risk factors
involved 8) Deliverables
Win Runner, Load runner, QTP , Silk Performer, Test director, Rational robot, QA run.
172. Why did you use automating testing tools in your job?
1) Prepare the automation Test plan 2) Identify the scenario 3) Record the
scenario 4) Enhance the scripts by inserting check points and Conditional Loops
5) Incorporated Error Handler 6) Debug the script 7) Fix the issue 8) Rerun the
script and report the result.
Yes, automating a test makes the test process: 1) Fast 2) Reliable 3) Repeatable 4)
Programmable 5) Reusable 6) Comprehensive
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
178. How you will evaluate the tool for test automation?
We need to concentrate on the features of the tools and how this could be
beneficial for our project. The additional new features and the enhancements of
the features will also help.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
1. The choice of automation tool for certain technologies 2. Wrong set of test
automated
Testing activities start from the elaboration phase. The various testing activities
are preparing the test plan, Preparing test cases, Execute the test case, Log the
bug, validate the bug & take appropriate action for the bug, Automate the test
cases.
Automate all the high priority test cases which need to be executed as a part of
regression testing for each build cycle.
The common problems are: 1. Maintenance of the old script when there is a
feature change or enhancement 2. The change in technology of the application
will affect the old scripts
184. What types of scripting techniques for test automation do you know?
5 types of scripting techniques: Linear Structured Shared Data Driven Key Driven
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
As I know it, test case design is about formulating the steps to be carried out to
verify something about the application under test. And this cannot be automated.
However, I agree that the process of putting the test results into the excel sheet.
189. How to find that tools work well with your existing system?
1. Discuss with the support officials 2. Download the trial version of the tool and
evaluate 3. Get suggestions from people who are working on the tool
190. Describe some problem that you had with automating testing tool
1) The inability of win runner to identify the third party control like infragistics
controls 2) The change of the location of the table object will cause object not
found error. 3) The inability of the win runner to execute the script against multiple
languages
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
Testing tools can be used for : Sanity tests(which is repeated on every build),
stress/Load tests(U simulate a large no of users, which is manually impossible) &
Regression tests(which are done after every code change)
193. How to find that tools work well with your existing system?
To find this, select the suite of tests which are most important for your application.
First run them with automated tool. Next subject the same tests to careful manual
testing. If the results are coinciding you can say your testing tool has been
performing.
194. How will you test the field that generates auto numbers of AUT when we
click the button 'NEW" in the application?
We can create a text file in a certain location, and update the auto generated
value each time we run the test and compare the currently generated value with
the previous one will be one solution.
195. How will you evaluate the fields in the application under test using
automation tool?
We can use Verification points (rational Robot) to validate the fields .Ex Using
object data, object data properties VP we can validate fields.
196. Can we perform the test of single application at the same time using
different tools on the same machine?
No. The Testing Tools will be in the ambiguity to determine which browser is
opened by which tool.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
The basic difference in web testing is here we have to test for URL's coverage and
links coverage. Using Win Runner we can conduct web testing. But we have to
make sure that Web test option is selected in "Add in Manager". Using WR we
cannot test XML objects.
199. What are the problems encountered during the testing the application
compatibility on different browsers and on different operating systems?
200. How exactly the testing the application compatibility on different browsers
and on different operating systems is done?
201. How testing is proceeded when SRS or any other document is not given?
If SRS is not there we can perform Exploratory testing. In Exploratory testing the
basic module is executed and depending on its results, the next plan is executed.
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics
kasperanalytics.com
+918130877931
hr@kasperanalytics.com
kasper-analytics