3performance Contract - Basic Schools - 2024
3performance Contract - Basic Schools - 2024
PREAMBLE
This Performance Contract is meant to deliver the key outcomes of these objectives as
indicated in the key performance indicators under specific outputs or deliverables of
this contract.
3. SPECIFIC OUTPUTS/DELIVERABLES
1
NAME OF SCHOOL: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS -2024
2
in English in (2022) Campaign
NST.
Number of SMC
meetings organised
Number of times of
NER at KG embarking on right-
aged enrolment
campaign
3
3.2 Output/Deliverable by SISOs
The SISOs shall be expected to monitor and ensure that the schools in their circuits
are delivering the Key Performance Indicators /Targets by the Headteachers listed in
the table at Clause 3.1 of this contract.
5. OBLIGATIONS:
5.1 Headteacher
The Headteacher accepts responsibility for the overall performance of the school. Any
constraints in achieving the outputs/deliverables of the school should be made known
to SISOs on regular basis.
5.2 SISOs
The SISO accepts responsibility for the overall performance of the schools in their
circuits. Any constraints in achieving the outputs/deliverables of the schools in their
circuits should be made known to District Directors
6.1 By SISOs: Performance of the Headteacher will be monitored throughout the year
and evaluated at the end of September and December. Headteachers whose output
achievement rates are high will be considered for Merit Awards. Low performance
achievers will either be sanctioned or given a remedial support.
6.2 By District Directors: Performance of the SISOs will be monitored throughout the
year and evaluated at the end of September and December. SISOs whose output
achievement rates are high will be considered for Merit Awards. Low performance
achievers will either be sanctioned or given a remedial support.
6.3 Reporting: The Headteacher is expected to submit quarterly reports on work progress
on the Key Performance Indicators / Targets to the District Director of Education three
days after the end of each quarter.
The following criteria and scores will be used to evaluate the performance of
managers of education:
4
c. Work improvement initiatives ------ 10%
d. Management of physical environment ----- 5%
e. Management/Staff/Students engagement ----- 5%
Officer has fully met the agreed targets and timelines and has produced results of
excellent quality. The Officer is a model of excellence in terms of the results achieved
and the means by which they were achieved.
Officer has achieved most of the agreed targets and indicators and has produced
results of good quality within agreed timelines.
Officer has achieved the average number of agreed targets and provided adequate
supporting rationale/reasons for not achieving all the specified targets.
Officer has achieved the minimum number of agreed targets and provided adequate
supporting rationale/reasons for not achieving all the specified targets.
Officer’s performance has not met the expected minimum standard for the job.
5
8. ENDORSEMENT OF CONTRACT
ABDUL-RAZAK MOHAMMED
a) …………………………………………………………………………………
Name of Headteacher
………………………………………………………………………………….
Signature
………………………………………………………………………………….
Date
AMADU TAIBU
b) ………………………………………………………………………………….
Name of SISO
BAU
………………………………………………………………………………….
Name of Circuit
………………………………………………………………………………….
Signature
………………………………………………………………………………….
Date
…………………………………………………………………………………....
Signature