Lec06
Lec06
1
2 THE QUOTIENT TOPOLOGY
So in this case, each fiber is an equivalence class. Note that the “quotient by a map”
description and the “quotient by an equivalence relation” description are equivalent:
Given any equivalence relation description, we have a natural projection map as shown
above; conversely given any quotient map f : X → Y , we can define an equivalence
relation by x ∼ y ⇐⇒ f (x) = f (y) and thus get an equivalence relation description of
the same quotient space.
Example 1.2 (The circle). One can regard the circle S 1 as a quotient space via
(1) S 1 = [0, 1]/{0, 1}: in other words, the only equivalence is 0 ∼ 1.
(2) S 1 = R/Z: in other words, we used the equivalence relation
x ∼ y ⇐⇒ x − y ∈ Z.
Example 1.3. Define an equivalence relation ∼ on R by
x ∼ y ⇐⇒ x − y ∈ Q.
Then what is the quotient topology on X = R/ ∼? Let U ⊂ X be an open set. Then
p−1 (U ) is open in R. In particular, there is an interval (a, b) ⊂ U . Since any real
number x ∈ R is equivalent to some number in (a, b), we must have p−1 (U ) = R. So
the quotient topology on X is the trivial topology.
¶ Universality.
According to the universality of the co-induced topology, namely Proposition 2.8
in Lecture 5 (whose proof is in your PSet), we have
Theorem 1.4 (Universality of quotient topology). Let X, Y, Z be topological spaces,
p : X → Y be a quotient map, and f : Y → Z be a map. Then f is continuous if
and only if g = f ◦ p is continuous. Moreover, the quotient topology on Y is the only
topology satisfying this property.
As a consequence, we have
Corollary 1.5. If p : X → Y is a quotient map, f : X → Z is a continuous map such
that f is constant on each fiber. Then the naturally induced map
f¯ : Y → Z, f¯(y) := f (p−1 (y))
is continuous.
As one can see, there is a “self-intersection” in the picture. However, the intersec-
tion should not exist in a real “picture” of RP2 . In fact, there is no way to embed RP2
into R3 . It can only be embedded into R4 . Moreover, just like the Möbius band, RPn
is not orientable for any even number n.
Remark 1.7. Similarly, one can define a topology on the space of complex lines in Cn+1
(the complex projective space CPn ). More generally, one can define a topology on the
space of k-dimensional vector subspaces of a vector space V (the Grassmannian mani-
fold Gr(k, V )2). Note that RPn is just a special Grassmannian : RPn = Gr(1, Rn+1 ).
1
Here, we endow with Rn+1 − {0} the standard Euclidean topology.
2However, for k > 1, Gr(k, V ) can not be realized as a quotient space of V . Instead it can be
realized as a quotient space of a much larger space, e.g. GL(V ).
4 THE QUOTIENT TOPOLOGY
It turns out that any (compact) surface can be constructed by starting at a suitably-
chosen polygon and attaching its boundary edges in suitable way. Here is a more
complicated one:
At the end of this semester, we will use such polygonal presentation to prove the
classification theorem of compact surfaces.
Figure 7. S 1 ∨ S 1 Figure 8. S 1 ∨ S 1 ∨ S 1 ∨ S 1 ∨ S 1
Remark 1.8. When talking about wedge sum, we are really working on “pointed
space” (X, x0 ), namely a space with a point x0 chosen. The wedge sum of (X, y0 )
and (Y, y0 ) is again a pointed space (X ∨ Y, {x0 }). By this way, when studying
the wedge sum of many spaces, we are always attaching the marked points into
one point.
(2) (The connected sum) Given two geometric objects A and B that are locally
Euclidian (“manifolds”), the connected sum A#B is constructed as follows:
one can remove a small ball (disk) from each, and then glue the boundary
spheres (circles) so that they are “connected together”. 4
In other words,
A#B = (A − D1 ) ∪f (B − D2 ),
where D1 , D2 are small disks on A and B respectively, and f is the attaching
map that identify ∂D1 with ∂D2 as shown in the picture.
(3) More generally, given topological spaces X and Y , the join of X and Y , some-
times denoted by X ? Y , is defined as X ? Y = X × Y × I/ ∼, where ∼ is given
by
(x, y1 , 0) ∼ (x, y2 , 0), (x1 , y, 1) ∼ (x2 , y, 1), ∀x, x1 , x2 ∈ X; y, y1 , y2 ∈ Y.
Note that for any element f ∈ Hom(X), we may say f “acts” on the space X by
sending an element x ∈ X to its image f (x) ∈ X.
Note that we may (and will always) assume τ is injective. Otherwise we can always
replace G by G/ker(τ ), which acts on X in the obvious way. Such an action is called
a faithful action.
We will see many examples below where the orbit is very simple. Here we give an
example where the orbit is very complicated:
Example 2.6. Consider S 1 acts on S 1 × S 1 by
√
eiα · (eiθ1 , eiθ2 ) := (ei(θ+α) , ei(θ+ 2α)
).
Then the orbit is a “dense curve” on the torus S 1 × S 1 .
So by definition, the orbit space is “the space of orbits”, endowed with the quotient
topology.
Example 2.8. Consider the R>0 (as a multiplicative group) action on R by multiplica-
tion, i.e.
a · x := ax.
Then there are three orbits: R>0 , {0}, R<0 . As a result, the orbit space consists of
three elements, {+, 0, −}, and the topology on the orbit space is
{∅, {+}, {−}, {+, −}, {+, 0, −}}.
¶ Examples.
We list several simple examples of orbit spaces which we will use when we study
covering spaces later this semester.
Example 2.9 (S 1 again). G = Z acts on X = R via
τ (n)(x) = n + x. (translation)
R/Z ' S 1 .
12 THE QUOTIENT TOPOLOGY