Cammarata - seventh circuit oral argument 9-19-24 - 23-2110 Summary
Cammarata - seventh circuit oral argument 9-19-24 - 23-2110 Summary
If you view the Full Docket you will be charged for 4 Pages $0.40
General Docket
Third Circuit Court of Appeals
https://ecf.ca3.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSummary.jsp&caseNum=23-2110&incOrigDkt=Y&incDktEntries=Y 1/2
11/17/24, 4:46 PM 23-2110 Summary
06/14/2024 49 HARD COPY RECEIVED from Appellant Joseph Cammarata - Reply Brief. Copies: 7. (TMS) [Entered: 06/14/2024
02:42 PM]
07/09/2024 50 Calendared for Friday, 09/20/2024. Calendar Clerk: AR. (AR) [Entered: 07/09/2024 03:32 PM]
07/09/2024 51 ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Peter Goldberger, Esq. for Appellant Joseph
Cammarata. Certificate of Service dated 07/09/2024. Service made by ECF. [23-2110] (PG) [Entered: 07/09/2024
03:48 PM]
07/10/2024 52 ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Paul G. Shapiro, Esq. for Appellee USA.
Certificate of Service dated 07/10/2023. Service made by ECF. [23-2110] (PGS) [Entered: 07/10/2024 10:37 AM]
08/27/2024 53 Oral Argument Notification for Thursday, 09/19/2024. Setting & Time: Maris Courtroom / 9:30am. Location:
Philadelphia, PA. (AR) [Entered: 08/27/2024 11:05 AM]
08/27/2024 54 TEXT ORDER (Clerk) At the direction of the Court, counsel is advised that the panel would like to hear argument on
the forfeiture/restitution issue(s) only. (AR) [Entered: 08/27/2024 11:37 AM]
08/27/2024 55 ECF FILER: SUMMARY OF ORAL ARGUMENT submitted by Attorney Peter Goldberger, Esq. for Appellant Joseph
Cammarata. Case Summary: Restitution to entities that did not suffer 'loss' was unlawful. Criminal forfeiture of house
was barred once govt advised at end of trial that it did not seek any specific property, thereby depriving dft of right to
jury determination under Rule 32.2b5. Post Video: YES. [23-2110] (PG) [Entered: 08/27/2024 04:04 PM]
09/03/2024 56 ECF FILER: SUMMARY OF ORAL ARGUMENT submitted by Attorney Paul G. Shapiro, Esq. for Appellee USA.
Case Summary: Whether the district court properly awarded restitution to claims funds that had paid the defendant's
fraudulent claims. Whether the court properly ordered forfeiture of a house where its connection to the fraud was not
established until after trial.. Post Video: YES. [23-2110] (PGS) [Entered: 09/03/2024 02:35 PM]
09/19/2024 57 COURT MINUTES OF ARGUED/SUBMITTED CASES. [22-2196, 22-2368, 23-2110, 23-2689, 23-2857, 22-1227, 23-
1494, 23-2605, 24-1382] --[Edited 09/20/2024 by AR to edit the attachment] (KY) [Entered: 09/19/2024 09:15 AM]
09/19/2024 58 ARGUED on Thursday, September 19, 2024. Panel: RESTREPO, MCKEE, and SMITH , Circuit Judges. Peter
Goldberger arguing for Appellant Joseph Cammarata; Paul G. Shapiro arguing for Appellee United States of
America. (KY) [Entered: 09/19/2024 12:40 PM]
https://ecf.ca3.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSummary.jsp&caseNum=23-2110&incOrigDkt=Y&incDktEntries=Y 2/2