EE006-3-2-CE Marking Scheme Page 1 of 4

MODULE DESCRIPTOR VERSION: VE1

NO. Course Learning Outcomes Assessments

Analyse control systems using various techniques. (C4, PLO2)
CLO1 Final Exam

Evaluate appropriate solutions for engineering applications based on control-system

CLO2 Group Assignment
knowledge. (C5, PLO3)
Exemplify the ability to work effectively in a group on control engineering design
CLO3 Group Assignment
activities. (A5, PLO9)

No. Group Question vs. Taxonomy

Assignment Cognitive Level Psychomotor Level Affective Level
Task No
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5
CLO2 1,2 50M
POM 100%
CLO3 4,5,6,7 50M
POM 100%

APU Level 2 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation

 EE006-3-2-CE Marking Scheme Page 2 of 4

Impact Pile Vibration Control

Name : _______________________________________________________ TP : _____________________

Criteria Fail Marginal Fail Pass Credit Distinction

0 1-2 3-5 6 -8 9 - 10
Abstract, Introduction,
 Clarified on the
   
General Formatting Clarified on the Clarified on the Clarified on the Clarified on the
introduction,
(10%) introduction, introduction, introduction, introduction,
abstract ad
abstract and
Group

abstract and abstract and abstract and

1 [CLO3 –PLO9-A5] formatting
formatting formatting formatting formatting
including sentence
including sentence including sentence including sentence including sentence
Abstract – 5 structure is very
structure is poor structure is average structure is good structure is
poor or not done
Introduction - 3 excellent
Formatting - 2

0 1-5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20
Development of model,  Displayed on either
transfer function and differential  Displayed the
 Displayed with

block diagram some correct
Displayed on either equations or correct differential
(20 %)  Displayed on only differential transfer function equations derived
attempt to obtain
two components out equations or obtained with no with each step and
[CLO3 –PLO9-A5]
Group

differential equation
2 of three and transfer function errors and most the transfer function
Model dev. & explanation – and transfer
substantial errors with slight errors, parts of block is obtained with no
10 function but more
found in three and about half of diagram are drawn erors. Accurate
than half of the
Diff. equation & components block diagram is correctly. Each block diagram with
block diagram are
explanation – 5 drawn correctly steps in the labels obtained
wrong
Transfer fn. & explanation - modelling is
5 explained

APU Level 2 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation

 EE006-3-2-CE Marking Scheme Page 3 of 4

0 1-5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20
 Displayed with
insufficient  Displayed use of
MATLAB Control  Displayed very little  Displayed on  Displayed on the
MATLAB script
response from
or no response from MATLAB script or correct use if and Simulink
Design and Simulation MATLAB or
Group

MATLAB or Simulink are MATLAB and blocks.

3 Simulink and many
(20%) Simulink and very correct. Each Simulink. Each
little or no result are
of the response are
response is response plot is
 Each response plot
[CLO3 –PLO9-A5] wrong. Very little is explained
Simulation values – 5 presented explained correctly explained correctly
or no result are correctly and
and analyzed
Plot. & formatting - 15 presented analyzed

Criteria Fail Marginal Fail Pass Credit Distinction

0 1-5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20
 Appraised sufficient  Appraised sufficient
 Appraised average discussion with extra discussion with extra
Discussion  Appraised poor and
relevant materials materials presented at
irrelevant discussion discussion and some
(20%) are related and able to presented and able to a level of critical
and not able to relate
[CLO2 –PLO3-C5]  Appraised done is not relate some of the test relate all the test analysis and able to
the test results to the
Individual

Result w/o controller – 10 relevant or not done. results to the design results to the design relate all the test
design specification
Result w controller - 10 specification and specification and results to the design
4 and physical system’s
physical system’s physical system’s specification and
requirements
requirements requirements. Some physical system’s
details missing requirements
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4

APU Level 2 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation

 EE006-3-2-CE Marking Scheme Page 4 of 4

Controller + Actuator 0-3 4-6 7-9 10 - 12 13 - 15

(15%)
[CLO2–PLO3-C5]  Assessed on the  Assessed on the  Assessed on system  Assessed on the
 Assessed on system
system chosen is system chosen is chosen is unique system chosen is
Controller used. – 5 chosen is unique
Individual

not unique and not unique but not and sufficiently unique and clearly
Actuator used. – 5 and justified
5 justified justified justified justified
Results – 5
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
0 1-2 3 4 5
Further improvement  Defended average
 Defended excellent
 Defended irrelevant enhancement is  Defended good
(5%)  Defended Poor enhancement
or no enhancement observed but not enhancement and is
Individual

[CLO2–PLO3-C5] enhancement
logical evident
implemented and is
logical
6
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9 - 10
 Concluded content is  Concluded content is  Concluded content
Conclusion  Concluded content is
very brief in length adequate and has a suitable length
 Concluded content is brief and includes a
(10%) and content is includes a short and includes a short
irrelevant or not done short summary of the
Individual

[CLO2–PLO3-C5] general and mostly

assignment and what
summary of the summary of the
7 irrelevant. assignment and what assignment and what
has been achieved
has been achieved has been achieved
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4

APU Level 2 Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation