Energy Efficient Scheduling in Iot Network: Department of Computer Science Lahore College For Women University Lahore

Energy Efficient Scheduling in IoT Network
Presented by:
Iram Fatima (1825210020)
Supervisor
Ms. Humaira Kausar
Co. Supervisor
Dr. Maria Anjum
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

LAHORE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN UNIVERSITY LAHORE
Free SlideSalad Google Slides Template Copyright (C) SlideSalad.com All rights reserved.
Introduction 01
Proposed Solution 02
Evaluation
03
Conclusion
04
Presentation Outlines
Future Work
05
Introduction
01 02 03 04
Background Supporting Literature Goals & Objectives

 Challenges Gap Analysis
 Problem Statement
 Applications
 IoT  Imbalance Energy in  Research Objectives
 Key components of Energy
 WSN Heterogeneous network
Efficiency
 Energy Consumption  CH challenge
Internet of Things (IoT)
• IoT is used in almost every application
of our life.
• Some predictions point out by the end

of 2030 range of IoT devices can be
increased by 75 billion .
Extent of international video investigation market between 2016
Free SlideSalad Google Slides Template IoT devices growth between

Copyright 2015 and 2025
(C) SlideSalad.com All[1]rights reserved.
Wireless Sensor Network (WSN)
• Sensor nodes have limited processing,
wireless communication and power
resource capabilities.
• To save the power of the network we used

the scheduling technique with WSN to
increase the life of the network.
WSN communicate with each other [2]

WSN
• The large-scale deployment leads to a higher energy
demand due to the increased communication volume. And
thereby, the lifetime of IoT devices is reduced.
• It is very important to classify energy-saving techniques

to optimum utilization.
• we explore various energy-efficient techniques proposed

recently for green IoT-based wireless systems.
• More specifically, IoT-based WSN, which is at the heart

of IoT technology.
WSN devices send data 2010and 2025 [3]

Types of WSN
Wireless Sensor Network (WSN)
Homogeneous WSN Heterogeneous WSN
Heterogeneous and Homogenous network [4]
Energy Consumption Issue
The network lifetime of WSN is one of the most challenging issues for any network protocol.
1. Collision
2. Idle Listening
3.Over Hearing
4.Traffic Fluctuation
5.Unstable behavior of nodes in Clustering
Energy Scheduling
Energy scheduling is essential process for
developing get better life of IoT devices in which
energy become efficient and with save time so the
network becomes more efficient and flexible.
Energy scheduling is used for efficiency with the

algorithms to enhance the throughput for the IoT
devices.
Free SlideSalad Google Slides Template Energy efficient

Copyrightrouting protocols [7]All rights reserved.
(C) SlideSalad.com
Challenges:
The network lifetime of WSN is one of the most challenging issues for any network protocol.
Connectivity and
Energy utilization
Coverage
Node Deployment
Fault Tolerance
and Transmission
Problem Statement
In IoT network energy efficiency is a challenging issue. Several
energy efficient methods were proposed at sensor node to get
energy efficient environment in sensor network.
The aim of these algorithms is to decrease the energy

consumption by using different protocols but still there is a
problem of energy consumption at node level.
An energy efficiency scheduling technique will be proposed

using SEP heterogeneous routing protocol.
Energy Computation Sensor nodes[8]

Key Components of SEP protocol System
The WSN also faces some issues which are topology maintenance, coverage and connectivity,
data duplication, security, communication failure, energy and hardware constraint clustering
process in WSN.
Behavior of such sensor networks becomes very unstable once the first node dies, especially in
the presence of node heterogeneity.
Fig 5: Key components of ReID system
Energy Efficient Scheduling Approaches Used to Address in SEP heterogeneous
two level approach in SEP

01
Three Level approach in SEP

02
03 Multi level Approaches in SEP
SEP Heterogeneous Techniques
Stable Elected Protocol [9] Threshold Sensitive Stable Zone Stable Elected
Elected Protocol [10] Protocol [11]
SEP VS Proposed SEP
SEP Proposed SEP
Single hop selected Single and multi level selected hop
Normal Nodes and advance nodes

Normal Nodes and advance nodes
Initial Energy Same Initial energy same
Distance based CH formation Distance and Weight based CH formation
Many nodes are dead Few nodes are dead
SEP heterogeneous
Protocol
The larger the stable region and the smaller
the unstable region are, the better the
reliability of the clustering process of the
sensor network is.
On the other hand, there is a tradeoff
between reliability and the lifetime of the
system. Until the death of the last node we
can still have some feedback about the
sensor field even though this feedback may
not be reliable.
Free SlideSalad Google Slides Template Copyright

SEP Heterogeneous WSN (C) SlideSalad.com
Clustering All rights reserved.
Distribution[12]
The Problem We Will Solve
Current Situation
Problem
The main objective of the SEP The CH will consume much Significance
is to minimize the energy more energy to receive and The significant. improvement
dissipation of each sensor transmit data than the other has been using SEP in
node and reduces the energy nodes. comparison with proposed
dissipation for the whole If nodes with little residual SEP in terms of energy
network. energy have been elected as consumption, data
cluster heads, it will affect the transmission and network
efficiency of the network due lifetime to Base station.
to its early death.
Proposed Solution
Outline
Proposed Solution
 Nodes types selection
 Weight Based CH selection

 Threshold value
Proposed SEP
• The clustering techniques acts as an effective approach for improving
energy efficiency and the overall network performance.
• The proposed approach uses the heterogeneous network model in which the
nodes are equipped with dissimilar levels of energy.
• The most important and critical part of the clustering procedure in the
proposed approach is the CH election process.
• In SEP protocol two types nodes Super and Ordinary nodes. Super nodes
additional energy than Ordinary nodes.
Total Energy
Super nodes energy is α=1, and ordinary node has energy level less than of
super nodes. So that, ordinary nodes µ= α/2 .
Super nodes energy=E0(1+α)
Ordinary nodes energy=E0 (1+µ)
Total energy=n.E0 (m + m*α+ µ+1)
Normal Nodes CH selection
• A node assumes a random number between 0 and 1 and a node is elected as CH, if the
selected random number is less than the threshold.
• As SEP uses the heterogeneous network, threshold values are different for Super nodes
and ordinary nodes. The threshold value for ordinary nodes is given by
Pop=Kop/N
/
Pord = P o p ( 1 + µ ) (m + m*α+µ+1)
T (sord) = { *(1-Erem) *E (total) /Ein if S
0 Otherwise
Super node CH selection
•The threshold value for Super nodes is given by
Pop=K op /N
/
Psup = P o p ( 1 + α ) (m + m*α+µ+1)
T (ssup) = { *(1 - Erem)*E(total)/Ein if S
0 Otherwise
Proposed Solution
CH selection Weight
Feature Extraction based
Metric Learning < T(n)
CH send to BS
Level 1 Level 2
Evaluation
Outline
Evaluation
 α=1, µ=α/2
 m=0.1
 Experiments
 Analysis and results
Data sets
Parameters Values
Super node α=1
Ordinary node µ=α/2

Percentage of nodes than are super m=0.1
Evaluation Results
Evaluation Proposed SEP Technique SEP
parameters
Number of alive 96 70
nodes
Energy consumed 50(nJ/bit) 60(nJ/bit)

Packet send to BS 2.5 2.4
Number of round 1500 1000
Average Energy consumed
Average Energy Consumed During the CH communication[13]

Dead Nodes
Dead Nodes after 1000 round During the CH communication[13]

Packets send CH to BS
Packet Send CH to BS[14]

Conclusions / Findings
 Proposed Solution  Evaluation

Weight probability (SEP protocol) Proposed solution is evaluated by
experimenting with processed data.
Weight Probability based selected CH
and then send data to BS
Future Directions
Recommendation 1
Training with More two level
Recommendation 2
The CH selection among sensor nodes are not dynamic which

results that far away from powerful nodes will die
Recommendation 3
Soft and Hard based data send to threshold
References
1. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Volume 2017, Article ID 6457942, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6457942
2. Georgios Smaragdakis Ibrahim Matta Azer Bestavros SEP: A Stable Election Protocol for clustered
heterogeneous wireless sensor networks
3. Manju Bala, Lalit Awasthi Proficient D-SEP Protocol with Heterogeneity for Maximizing the Lifetime
of Wireless Sensor Networks
4. S. Faisal, N. Javaid, A. Javaid, M. A. Khan, S. H. Bouk, Z. A. Khan Z-SEP: Zonal-Stable Election
Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,
5. Said Benkirane M.Lahcen HasnaouiAbderrahim Benihssane Mohamed Laghdir Distance-based Stable
Election Protocol (DBSEP) for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network( 58– No.16, N
References
6 Y. Mishra, A. Singhadia, and R. Pandey, “Energy Level Based Stable Election Protocol in Wireless Sensor Network,” vol.
17, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2014.
7 G. Arya, “Modified Stable Election Protocol ( M-SEP ) for Hierarchical WSN,” vol. 79, no. 16, pp. 35–39, 2013.
8 L. J. Naik, K. V Ramanaiah, and K. S. Rajan, “Performance Evaluation of MCHSEP and SEP protocol for Wireless Sensor
Networks,” no. 6, pp. 308–311, 2019.
9 O. Rehman, N. Javaid, B. Manzoor, A. Hafeez, A. Iqbal, and M. Ishfaq, “Energy Consumption Rate based Stable Election
Protocol ( ECRSEP ) for WSNs,” Procedia - Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 19, pp. 932–937, 2013.
10 S. Kumar, S. K. Verma, and A. Kumar, “Enhanced Threshold Sensitive Stable Election Protocol for Heterogeneous
Wireless Sensor Network,” Wirel. Pers. Commun., vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 2643–2656, 2015.
11 M. L. Hasnaoui, M. Laghdir, T. Multidisciplinary, and F. El, “Distance-based Stable Election Protocol ( DB-SEP ) for
Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network,” no. October, 2012.
References
12. J. Yanfei, C. Guangda, and Z. Liquan, “Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol Based on Zone for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks,” vol.
2021, 2021.
13 . F. A. Aderohunmu and J. D. Deng, “An Enhanced Stable Election Protocol ( SEP ) for Clustered Heterogeneous An Enhanced Stable Election
Protocol ( SEP ) for Clustered Heterogeneous WSN .,” no. January 2009, 2017.
14 D. Li and S. Wei, “Improvement of the SEP protocol based on community structure of node degree,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1839, no. May, 2017.
15 “SEP: A Stable Election Protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks,” pp. 1–11
16 S. Iqbal and S. B. Shagrithaya, “Performance Analysis of Stable Election Protocol and its Extensions in WSN,” no. 978, pp. 744–748, 2014.
17 S. Ahirwar and P. Tanwar, “Unequal Clustering Energy Efficient Stable Election Protocol in Wireless Sensor Network,” vol. 3, no. 11, 2013.
18 G. Arya, “Modified Stable Election Protocol ( M-SEP ) for Hierarchical WSN,” vol. 79, no. 16, pp. 35–39, 2013.
19 L. J. Naik, K. V Ramanaiah, and K. S. Rajan, “Performance Evaluation of MCHSEP and SEP protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” no. 6,
pp. 308–311, 2019.
20 S. Verma, “Energy Efficient Stable Election Protocol Scheme for Extend the Lifetime of WSN with Isolated Nodes,” vol. 180, no. 45, pp. 1–5,
2018.
QUESTIONS
THANK YOU !
REAL-WORLD PERSON RE-IDENTIFICATION
MODELING USING DEEP LEARNING
Presented By
Nida Fatima Abdul Malik (1825210030 )
Supervisor
Dr. Maria Anjum ( Assistant Professor )

Energy Efficient Scheduling in Iot Network: Department of Computer Science Lahore College For Women University Lahore

Uploaded by

Energy Efficient Scheduling in Iot Network: Department of Computer Science Lahore College For Women University Lahore

Uploaded by

Energy Efficient Scheduling in IoT Network

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

Background Supporting Literature Goals & Objectives

• Some predictions point out by the end

Extent of international video investigation market between 2016

Free SlideSalad Google Slides Template IoT devices growth between

• To save the power of the network we used

WSN communicate with each other [2]

• It is very important to classify energy-saving techniques

• we explore various energy-efficient techniques proposed

• More specifically, IoT-based WSN, which is at the heart

WSN devices send data 2010and 2025 [3]

Wireless Sensor Network (WSN)

Homogeneous WSN Heterogeneous WSN

Heterogeneous and Homogenous network [4]

Energy scheduling is used for efficiency with the

Free SlideSalad Google Slides Template Energy efficient

The aim of these algorithms is to decrease the energy

An energy efficiency scheduling technique will be proposed

Energy Computation Sensor nodes[8]

Fig 5: Key components of ReID system

two level approach in SEP

Three Level approach in SEP

03 Multi level Approaches in SEP

SEP Proposed SEP

Single hop selected Single and multi level selected hop

Normal Nodes and advance nodes

Initial Energy Same Initial energy same

Distance based CH formation Distance and Weight based CH formation

Many nodes are dead Few nodes are dead

Free SlideSalad Google Slides Template Copyright

 Nodes types selection

 Weight Based CH selection

T (sord) = { *(1-Erem) *E (total) /Ein if S

T (ssup) = { *(1 - Erem)*E(total)/Ein if S

Metric Learning < T(n)

Ordinary node µ=α/2

Energy consumed 50(nJ/bit) 60(nJ/bit)

Average Energy Consumed During the CH communication[13]

Dead Nodes after 1000 round During the CH communication[13]

Packet Send CH to BS[14]

 Proposed Solution  Evaluation

Training with More two level

The CH selection among sensor nodes are not dynamic which

Soft and Hard based data send to threshold

You might also like

T (sord) = { (1-Erem) E (total) /Ein if S

T (ssup) = { (1 - Erem)E(total)/Ein if S