Cultural relativism refers to understanding cultural practices in their own context rather than judging them against one's own standards. It contends that what is considered moral is defined by each society's norms rather than being objectively universal. However, cultural relativism does not mean that all cultural beliefs are valid or harmful practices acceptable. It is an analytical tool in anthropology to investigate cultures without judgment and understand behaviors within their cultural context.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views
Module 3
Cultural relativism refers to understanding cultural practices in their own context rather than judging them against one's own standards. It contends that what is considered moral is defined by each society's norms rather than being objectively universal. However, cultural relativism does not mean that all cultural beliefs are valid or harmful practices acceptable. It is an analytical tool in anthropology to investigate cultures without judgment and understand behaviors within their cultural context.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10
DEFINITION OF CULTURAL RELATIVISM IN THE
PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIOLOGY
WHAT IS CULTURAL RELATIVISM?
ACCORDING TO KHAN ACADEMY (2020), CULTURAL RELATIVISM REFERS TO NOT JUDGING A CULTURE TO OUR OWN STANDARDS OF WHAT IS RIGHT OR WRONG, STRANGE OR NORMAL. INSTEAD, WE SHOULD TRY TO UNDERSTAND CULTURAL PRACTICES OF OTHER GROUPS IN ITS OWN CULTURAL CONTEXT. FOR EXAMPLE, IN THE PHILIPPINES, INSTEAD OF THINKING, “FRIED GRASSHOPPERS (TIPAKLONG) ARE DISGUSTING!” ONE SHOULD INSTEAD ASK, “WHY DO SOME CULTURES EAT FRIED INSECTS?” YOU MAY LEARN THAT FRIED GRASSHOPPERS ARE FULL OF PROTEIN. IN ADDITION, CULTURAL RELATIVISM WRONGLY CLAIMS THAT EACH CULTURE HAS ITS OWN DISTINCT BUT EQUALLY VALID MODE OF PERCEPTION, THOUGHT, AND CHOICE. CULTURAL RELATIVISM, THE OPPOSITE OF THE IDEA THAT MORAL TRUTH IS UNIVERSAL AND OBJECTIVE, CONTENDS THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ABSOLUTE RIGHT AND WRONG. THERE IS ONLY RIGHT AND WRONG AS SPECIFIED BY THE MORAL CODE OF EACH SOCIETY. WITHIN A PARTICULAR SOCIETY, A STANDARD OF RIGHT AND WRONG CAN BE INVIOLATE. CULTURAL RELATIVISM MAINTAINS THAT MAN’S OPINION WITHIN A GIVEN CULTURE DEFINES WHAT IS RIGHT AND WRONG. (YOUNKINS, IDEA THE ENGLISH TERM “RELATIVISM” CAME INTO USAGE ONLY IN THE 19TH CENTURY. JOHN GROTE WAS PROBABLY THE FIRST TO EMPLOY IT WHEN IN EXPLORATIO PHILOSOPHICA (1865) HE WROTE: THE NOTION OF THE MASK OVER THE FACE OF NATURE IS…. WHAT I HAVE CALLED “RELATIVISM”. IF “THE FACE OF NATURE” IS REALITY, THEN THE MASK OVER IT, WHICH IS WHAT THEORY GIVES US, IS SO MUCH DECEPTION, AND THAT IS WHAT RELATIVISM ITS GERMAN COUNTERPART, “RELATIVISMUS”, HAS A LONGER HISTORY. WILHELM TRAUGOTT KRUG, WHO SUCCEEDED KANT IN THE UNIVERSITY OF KÖNIGSBERG IN HIS PHILOSOPHICAL LEXICON, DEFINES IT AS: “THE ASSUMPTION THAT EVERYTHING WHICH WE EXPERIENCE AND THINK (THE SELF, THE IDEA OF REASON, TRUTH, MORALITY, RELIGION ETC.) IS ONLY SOMETHING RELATIVE, AND THEREFORE HAS NO ESSENTIAL ENDURANCE AND NO EXAMPLE OF CULTURAL RELATIVISM: 1. HERE IN THE PHILIPPINES, PREMARITAL SEX IS MORALLY UNACCEPTABLE. IF YOU GO TO ANOTHER COUNTRY, TEENAGERS WANT TO LOSE THEIR VIRGINITY AT A YOUNG AGE. 2. HERE IN THE PHILIPPINES, WE DO NOT CEASE TO DEBATE ON THE MORAL ACCEPTABILITY OF CONTRACEPTIVES. IN ANOTHER COUNTRY, ABORTION IS PERFECTLY NORMAL, MORE SO THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL CONTRACEPTIVES. 3. ONE SOCIETY MAKES ANY PROHIBITIONS ON WOMEN; WHILE ANOTHER SOCIETY ALLOWS WOMEN TO HAVE EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES AND OBLIGATIONS AS MEN. IMPORTANCE OF CULTURAL RELATIVISM • CULTURAL RELATIVISM DOES NOT MEAN ANYTHING A CULTURE OR GROUP OF PEOPLE BELIEVE IS TRUE. JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE BELIEVES THIS TO BE TRUE, DOESN’T MAKE IT SO. • CULTURAL RELATIVISM DOES NOT MEAN THAT ANYTHING A CULTURE DOES IS GOOD OR MORAL. SOME PEOPLE MIGHT CLAIM THAT WE CAN NEVER UNDERSTAND SOMETHING BECAUSE IT’S ‘CULTURAL’ NOT SO. SOME CERTAIN BELIEFS AND PRACTICES ARE OBJECTIVELY HARMFUL. • CULTURAL RELATIVISM DOESN’T MEAN THAT CULTURES CAN’T BE COMPARED. THERE IS SOMETIMES A STRANGE NOTION THAT THERE ARE NO COMMONALITIES BETWEEN CULTURES. IT IS TRUE THAT THERE ARE VERY FEW UNIVERSALS ACROSS ALL HUMAN EXPERIENCE, BUT THERE ARE DEFINITELY SOME CORE THINGS THAT HUMANS ALL DO, MOST OF WHICH RELATE TO SURVIVAL AND CONTINUITY. BUT EVEN IN PRACTICES THAT ARE ENTIRELY DIFFERENT, WE CAN FIND COMPARISON AS A USEFUL TOOL FOR UNDERSTANDING IDEAS AND WHAT’S SOMETHING MORE?
CULTURAL RELATIVISM IS A VITAL TOOL IN
ANTHROPOLOGY. AS SUCH, IT DOES NOT CLAIM TO DEFINE RIGHT OR WRONG BEHAVIOR. INSTEAD, IT IS A DEVICE USED TO INVESTIGATE DIFFERENT CULTURES WITHOUT MAKING JUDGMENTS ABOUT THOSE CULTURES. BASICALLY, IT IS A DECISION TO UNDERSTAND AN INDIVIDUAL’S BEHAVIOR WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THAT INDIVIDUAL’S CULTURE, INSTEAD OF COMPARING IT TO ANOTHER CULTURE.